By Julie Percha

May 18, 2010 7:17am

Presidential Wave: Obama in Spotlight on Year’s Biggest Primary Day

By Rick Klein:

Now we see what the noise is all about. Kingmakers are set to lose some rank on Tuesday, in the single most intense and important day of voting we’re likely to see until November. Four races tell four different stories, all with their own implications. But what unites them is a reaction against the political establishment that will influence campaigns and candidates for the next six months and well beyond. And with the wave coming, President Obama stands on the shore, though well within the splash zone. (How loudly does it speak that the president will be just outside the Pennsylvania border — in Youngstown, Ohio, on Tuesday — while Vice President Joe Biden spent Monday night in Philadelphia, and neither found time to campaign for Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., in the closing days?) A president who isn’t on the ballot is everywhere on this voting day, even as he stays away from places that are actually voting. A candidate who came to office promising to up-end the establishment has established himself just fine, it turns out. In Specter’s primary race against Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., the president and the political movement he leads are being put to the test among core Democrats. In a rural corner of that same state, white, working-class Democrats render judgment on the Democratic agenda, by choosing a successor for the late Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who embodied and enriched his district for more than three decades. In Arkansas, big labor and the liberal Netroots united behind Lt. Gov. Bill Halter in his primary against Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark. — the candidate with the Obama/establishment backing. In Kentucky, the tea party movement that defines itself so much around what it doesn’t like about Obama seems poised to claim its biggest victory, with Rand Paul, R-Ky., favored over Trey Grayson — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s candidate. (And in Connecticut, some second-guessing — and maybe quite a bit more — Tuesday about Richard Blumenthal’s campaign for Senate. Where does this rank in the oppo hall of fame? What was wrong with Sen. Chris Dodd again? And is it that hard to make clear whether you did or didn’t serve in Vietnam?) In Kentucky, polls opened at 6 a.m. ET and close at 7 p.m. ET. In Pennsylvania, polls are open from 7 a.m. ET to 8 p.m. ET. In Arkansas, polls open at 8:30 a.m. ET and close at 8:30 p.m. ET. In Oregon, all ballots for the state’s mail-in voting must be received by 11 p.m. ET. Your big lessons: “One big question that could be answered is how strong outsiders' appeal is in a year in which dissatisfaction with Washington is broad and deep. Paul's campaign in Kentucky has been grounded in this message, and Sestak, too, has cast Specter as the ultimate insider. In the special election in Pennsylvania's 12th Congressional District, Burns has done the same to Democrat Critz, although he was only a congressional staffer,” Dan Balz writes in The Washington Post.  “Another answer that might emerge is how enthusiastic voters in the two parties are, measured in part by turnout. Special elections are not always reliable indicators of midterm outcomes, but if Democrats manage to hold onto the Murtha seat in Pennsylvania, strategists in both parties may be forced to recalibrate the GOP's prospects for taking control of the House in November.” That piece that’s on the ballot everywhere: “The Democratic Party also faces a brewing rebellion among the white, working-class voters within its ranks — people it needs to form a national governing majority,” The Wall Street Journal’s Peter Wallsten writes. “Democratic strategists said their party faces great peril if it is unable to find candidates this year who can shore up the connection with white, blue-collar voters who are trending toward the GOP. Mr. Obama won election in 2008 thanks largely to highly energized minority voters and liberal whites, but white voters like these in northeastern Pennsylvania were crucial to building a majority.”  Time’s Jay Newton-Small: “The real story of this week's primaries and special elections may be the Democrats' intraparty war, as groups impatient – or disillusioned – with the Obama Administration take aim at incumbents.” As for the marquee matchup — the one that will draw the biggest headlines on Wednesday: “I'm a lucky guy,” Specter said at a Monday night campaign stop, at a drizzly Phillies game. “I don't predict the weather. I predict the victories.” Said Sestak: “His time truly has come and gone.” Dick Polman, in the Philadelphia Inquirer: “The intangibles would seem to favor Sestak [Tuesday]; the two-term suburban Philadelphia congressman is a relatively fresh face, whereas, given the current environment, Specter may well have worn out his extended welcome. … Word has it that Specter, at age 80, still plays a fiercely competitive game of squash. In the macho environs of The Sporting Club in Philadelphia, facing off against foes decades younger, he grunts and plays the angles, as always. But one gets the sense that, politically at least, the walls may be closing in.”  What else needs to be known about the president’s role? “President Barack Obama says he loves Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) — just not quite enough to hazard an 11th-hour political trip to Pennsylvania for an ally of convenience increasingly viewed as unlikely to win,” Politico’s Jonathan Martin and Glenn Thrush write. “Once thought to be an unalloyed asset for most any Democratic candidate, Obama’s personal involvement is no longer guaranteed – or guaranteed to succeed. … Tuesday’s crop of primaries and special elections vividly illustrate the challenge for Obama: the number of races where he can have a positive impact has been narrowed by 18 months of constant political warfare, Democratic electoral defeats and his own missteps.” “In a race this close the logistics of turnout operations could be pivotal,” Dennis B. Rody and James O'Toole write in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. “Mr. Specter, with the support of the state Democratic establishment and most of the state's unions, inherited a ready-made Election Day apparatus. Mr. Sestak had to build one from scratch. Mr. Specter is hoping for a disproportionately heavy turnout from Philadelphia, particularly in the African-American wards where, polls suggest, he had heavy support.”  Would a late Obama visit have mattered? “It might jack up turnout, so it might affect 1 percent of the overall vote, but probably not,” Gov. Ed Rendell, D-Pa., said on ABC/Washington Post’s “Top Line” Monday. “People know where the president stands. I mean guys, you have to be here and watch TV. I love Barack Obama, but I'm sick and tired of seeing him on TV.” In PA-12 — pressure on the other side: “If Republicans can’t win Murtha’s district, Democrats say, then how can they expect to capture the 40 Democratic-held seats they need to win the majority in what GOP officials anticipate will be a great year for the party?” Roll Call’s Greg Giroux reports.  Slate’s John Dickerson: “If Democrats pull out a win, it may signal that an all-out push can save marginal seats in a year that favors Republicans. If they can't, Republicans can feel a little bit better about those 49 districts John McCain won in 2008 that also elected incumbent Democrats.” In Arkansas: “Can a centrist senator survive in this pugilistic day of ‘pick a side’?” asks Suzi Parker, in the Christian Science Monitor. “[Lincoln's] best hope is that she'll live to fight another round. Her worst nightmare: She'll be out early, bested in the Democratic primary by Lt. Gov. Bill Halter, who is running decidedly to her left.” In Kentucky: “Should Paul pull off a coup in Kentucky, the win will speak volumes not only about the current anti-establishment fervor, but also about the growing disconnect between the Republican Party establishment and grass-roots conservatives,” McClatchy’s William Douglas and Halimah Abdullah report. “For many tea party members, Paul has come to symbolize the anti-incumbent, anti-Washington insurgency. He has the backing of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, a tea party favorite, and evangelical leader James Dobson, who's called his earlier support for Grayson ‘an embarrassing mistake.’ ” Walter Shapiro, at Politics Daily: “Rand Paul victory Tuesday night signifies six more months of Kentucky as one of the biggest national playing fields for Tea Party-style politics.” Grayson’s closing argument, argumentative: “I think he’d be more of a grandstander,” Grayson said Monday of Paul, per Politico’s Manu Raju. “I’m running to be a United States senator from Kentucky, I’m not running to be the candidate of the tea party … Listen to his speeches, watch him in our debates. … The guy never talks about our state.” Looking beyond Tuesday — a big blow to a top-tier recruit, in Connecticut. “We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,” state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said to a veterans group in March 2008. The New York Times’ Raymond Hernandez: “There was one problem: Mr. Blumenthal, a Democrat now running for the United States Senate, never served in Vietnam. He obtained at least five military deferments from 1965 to 1970 and took repeated steps that enabled him to avoid going to war, according to records.” “The deferments allowed Mr. Blumenthal to complete his studies at Harvard; pursue a graduate fellowship in England; serve as a special assistant to The Washington Post’s publisher, Katharine Graham; and ultimately take a job in the Nixon White House.” “In 1970, with his last deferment in jeopardy, he landed a coveted spot in the Marine Reserve, which virtually guaranteed that he would not be sent to Vietnam. He joined a unit in Washington that conducted drills and other exercises and focused on local projects, like fixing a campground and organizing a Toys for Tots drive.” Statement from Mindy Myers, Blumenthal’s campaign manager, in advance of a campaign event with veterans on Tuesday: “The New York Times story is an outrageous distortion of Dick Blumenthal's record of service. Unlike many of his peers, Dick Blumenthal voluntarily joined the Marine Corps Reserves in 1970 and served for six months in Parris Island, SC and six years in the reserves.  He received no special treatment from anyone.” From Kevin Rennie’s “Daily Ructions” blog — as circulated by the McMahon campaign (!): “The Blumenthal Bombshell comes at the end of more than 2 months of deep, persistent research by Republican Linda McMahon’s Senate campaign. It gave the explosive Norwalk video recording to The Times. This is what comes of $16 million, a crack opposition research operation and an opponent who, in the words of the president Blumenthal worked for on a draft deferment, who gave them the sword.” Also Tuesday — President Obama hits Youngstown, Ohio, talking jobs. ABC’s Sunlen Miller: “While there Mr. Obama will tour the V & M Star facility, a producer of ‘seamless Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG), Line & Standard Pipe, Coupling Stock and Mechanical Tube.’ White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said yesterday the business – through an investment by the Recovery Act – was recently able to hire several hundred new workers.” Stop us if you’ve heard this one before … “Democrats Shifting Focus Back to Jobs Creation,” reads The New York Times headline. “A year that Democrats decreed would be about ‘jobs, jobs, jobs’ has produced a far different check list as its sixth month nears: health care, financial regulation, energy, a nuclear arms treaty and a Supreme Court vacancy, as well as investigations into a mine accident, a calamitous oil spill, a failed terrorist attack in Times Square and alleged Wall Street fraud,” the Times’ Jackie Calmes writes. “That crowded calendar of priorities largely explains why the employment bills have languished, Democrats say. They hope to change that starting this week.” On the Hill — hot lights, in a new direction: “Last week, it was oil executives who faced the wrath of lawmakers eager to find blame for the massive oil spill spreading in the Gulf of Mexico. On Tuesday, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and other federal officials will come under questioning for what the government did — or did not do — to prevent the oil spill, and how they have responded since oil started streaming into the Gulf last month,” the AP’s Matthew Daly reports. Senate Homeland Security Chairman Joe Lieberman, I-Conn.: “Did our government, through MMS, require an oil spill response plan adequate to the widest range of possible dangers, including the failure of a blowout preventer? … It sure appears that they did not.” Getting in front: “President Obama will sign an executive order to establish a presidential commission to investigate the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico,” ABC’s Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report. “Few details were available about the commission, but its announcement comes as the Obama administration faces increased criticism for its handling of the BP oil spill in the Gulf — both for failures by the Department of the Interior's Minerals Management Service (MMS) in adequately regulating offshore drilling, and for questions about whether the administration relied too much on BP for information and response after the April 20 explosion.” “The move follows criticism of the government agency responsible for regulating offshore drilling safety, which Mr. Obama joined last Friday when he denounced the ‘cozy relationship’ between oil companies and federal regulators,” The Wall Street Journal’s Jared Favole and Stephen Power report. First casualty: “Chris Oynes, the Interior Department official in charge of overseeing offshore oil and gas drilling for the Minerals Management Service, will step down in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill,” ABC’s Sunlen Miller and Karen Travers report. Court-watching, for the big one to come: “The Supreme Court set a potential blueprint Monday for upholding the recently enacted healthcare law and its mandate that all Americans have insurance, saying Congress has a ‘broad authority’ to pass laws that are ‘rationally related’ to its constitutional aims,” David G. Savage reports in the Los Angeles Times. “The Constitution not only gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, the justices said, but the authority to enact all laws that are ‘necessary and proper’ to carrying out this authority.” Checking in on a branch of the family tree: “President Obama’s aunt, Zeituni Polly Onyango, an enigmatic figure who exploded onto the national scene in 2008 while living illegally in Boston, has been granted permission to stay in the United States, the immigration court said yesterday,” The Boston Globe’s Maria Sacchetti reports. “Judge Leonard I. Shapiro granted her asylum Friday in Boston, three months after Onyango’s lawyers said she feared violence and health risks if she were forced to return to her native Kenya. The ruling clears the way for her to apply for legal permanent residency in a year, and US citizenship after five years.” On the circuit: “Bristol Palin is hitting the speakers' circuit and will command between $15,000 and $30,000 for each appearance, Palin family attorney Thomas Van Flein said Monday,” the AP’s Becky Bohrer reports.
The Kicker: “Calbuzz regrets the error.” — Calbuzz.com correction, after California Democratic Party Chairman John Burton complained that he had been misquoted as saying “f— you”; he actually said “go f— yourself.” “I'm not doing a press conference today, but we'll be seeing you guys during the course of this week.” — President Obama, declining to answer questions from the press after signing the Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act into law.
For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s blog . . . all day every day:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/

User Comments

We are telling you to STOP the path you are on. Are you listening Obama? 2012 is coming.We remember “command and control” threats and the healthcare scam.

Posted by: scoty | May 18, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Scoty: We know that you are not among the 53% majority that voted for President Obama. So what’s new?

Posted by: New Wave | May 18, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am

It seems a little shameful that the President isn’t out campaigning for Specter and Lincoln. After all, they delivered his healthcare package. But the President doesn’t want to be seen campaigning for yet another losing candidate.
In the end, this might be regrettable for him because the Democrats in Congress are going to be a little less likely to stick their necks out for him to pass the next legislation now they know he won’t stick his neck out for them.

Posted by: memphispiano | May 18, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am

***Court-watching, for the big one to come: “The Supreme Court set a potential blueprint Monday for upholding the recently enacted healthcare law and its mandate that all Americans have insurance, saying Congress has a ‘broad authority’ to pass laws that are ‘rationally related’ to its constitutional aims,” David G. Savage reports in the Los Angeles Times. “The Constitution not only gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, the justices said, but the authority to enact all laws that are ‘necessary and proper’ to carrying out this authority.”***
I looked into the case, because I’ve following some of the health care court cases. The case mentioned here actually isn’t one of those cases, challanging the health care law. It is actually a case called United States v. Comstock dealing with child predators who are being kept in prison after they have served their terms.
From the Cato institute site “Six days before the scheduled release of Graydon Comstock—who had been sentenced to 37 months in jail for receiving child pornography—the Attorney General certified Comstock as sexually dangerous. Three years later, Comstock thus remains confined in a medium security prison, as do more than 60 other similarly situated men in the Eastern District of North Carolina alone. He and several others challenged their confinements as going beyond Congress’s constitutional authority and won in both the district and appellate courts.”
Of the 7-2 records Scalia and Thomas disented.
The assenting opinion written by Beyer “1) The Clause grants Congress broad authority to pass laws in furtherance of its constitutionally enumerated powers. It makes clear that grants of specific federal legislative authority are accompanied by broad power to enact laws that are “convenient, or useful” or “conducive” to the enumerated power’s “beneficial exercise,” e.g., McCulloch v. Maryland , 4 Wheat. 316, 413, 418, and that Congress can “legislate on that vast mass of incidental powers which must be involved in the constitution,” id., at 421. In determining whether the Clause authorizes a particular federal statute, there must be “means-ends rationality” between the enacted statute and the source of federal power.”

Posted by: bobtherepublican | May 18, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am

NewWave—Do you not feel that “command and control” or jail time if you do not buy our insurance is a threat against the American public. Does letting Kevin Jennings near your children give you a queasy feeling? For real ?

Posted by: scoty | May 18, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Scoty: Healthcare is the LAW of the LAND…..yawn….zzzzzzzzzzzzzz… next please !

Posted by: New Wave | May 18, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am

The disenting opinion on US vs Comstock from Jutice Thomas “JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE SCALIA joins inall but Part III–A–1–b, dissenting.
The Court holds today that Congress has power underthe Necessary and Proper Clause to enact a law authoriz-ing the Federal Government to civilly commit “sexually dangerous person[s]” beyond the date it lawfully could hold them on a charge or conviction for a federal crime. 18
U. S. C. §4248(a). I disagree. The Necessary and ProperClause empowers Congress to enact only those laws that“carr[y] into Execution” one or more of the federal powers enumerated in the Constitution. Art. I, §8, cl. 18. Because §4248 “Execut[es]” no enumerated power, I must respect-fully dissent.”
The full opinion of the court is a 58 page read on the supremecourt.gov site, if you have about half an hour to kill.

Posted by: bobtherepublican | May 18, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am

So many incumbents with careers at risk. So many having trouble governing with the angry loud voices of the people ringing in their ears. If the voices of the people are interfering with the way you’re governing you’re probably doing it wrong. The window of opportunity to push liberalism is rapidly closing. Obama saw it coming. That’s why every bill has a deadline for passage. It may be 50 years before this country sees another liberal president. It may take 50 years to fix the damage of his first year and a half of spending money we don’t have.

Posted by: gollywiggle | May 18, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

The primaries are of little importance. What has to happen, is to defeat the Dems, in November, and stop the dictatorial tyranny.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | May 18, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am

New wave—”next” would be actually answering my questions.

Posted by: scoty | May 18, 2010, 10:12 am 10:12 am

A president who isn’t on the ballot is everywhere on this voting day, even as he stays away from places that are actually voting. by Rick Klien
__________________
It would be to Obama’s advantage to stay far, far AWAY from anyhting having to do with the 2010 elections. The less the voters see him, the better chance his party has.

Posted by: ivan | May 18, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am

gollywiggle: The 50 years you mention will come after the 150 years it will take to pull us out of the ditch created by the Chenney.. oops Bush Administration.

Posted by: New Wave | May 18, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am

ivan: And what was the deficit (if you eliminate accounting gimmicks and actually include the cost of wars) and the national debt at the end of 2006?
Also which Party’s Presidents grew the deficit highest when they were in office? A clue – it’s not DEM Presidents. A knowledge of real facts may be the right prescription for you.

Posted by: New Wave | May 18, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Ivan — My Party is not in charge I am an Independent —- However, I call a spade a spade !!! The Present administration has made mistakes but averted The Second Great Depression — Our Financial sector has recovered — GM was on the verge of collapse 1 year ago– They just showed a Profit — The Stock Market just had its best year in its entire History !!! I call that Progress– There’s plenty more to be done!!!

Posted by: brian | May 18, 2010, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Tarballs — they are the topic du jour, it seems. Actually tarballs have been washing up on Gulf beaches for thousands of years. Native peoples used them for water-proofing material. There is a natural ooze of oil from the seafloor in the Gulf. Any tarball needs to be tested to ascertain if it came from the leak, or is naturally occurring.

Posted by: Quo Warranto? | May 18, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Interestingly, the TBag movement on the right and liberals on the left seem to have found common cause. If you’ve seen This Week (Sundays), you witnessed Greenwald (a liberal writer) and Greg Craig (an Obama wonk) go at it more fervently than George Will or Ed Gillespie went after either Greenwald or Craig – FASCINATING! I have always felt that the crowing I read and hear from TBaggers or Republicans (like Ed Gillespie) regarding the chances of Republicans and TBaggers in the midterms is WAAAAAY TOOOOO simplistic (disatisfaction over Obamacare and incumbency equals midterm Conservative victories in Congress). But an interesting trend, summed up nicely in this article, is the growing dissatisfaction BY THE LEFT with the Democrats (and Obama!) whom they helped to elect to office. WOW! You might actually see new faces this midterm in Congress come January 2011. But here’s my question – is that a good thing? The refrain that Congress has become hijacked by special interests, that they are not truly representative of their constituencies but rather more interested in perpetuating their own careers certainly has a grain of truth to it – but my questions are these: what’s to say that, say, a TBagger elected to Congress won’t fall into the same trap? and second, is it a good thing to trade experience and knowledge gained (say, from someone on the Intelligence committee, or the nuclear energy committee) over a long career, with a fresh, new, idealistic, but ignorant face?

Posted by: map2history | May 18, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Another GOP Hypocrite bites the dust: Family Values GOP Rep Mark Souder (R-IN) To Resign Over Affair

Posted by: New Wave | May 18, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am

map2history: Good post. I am for fresh faces in Congress (either Party)and even for a 3rd Party presence in Congress. So that our Congress can actually do real work for Americans.
I want real policy discussions to solve problems rather than granstanding by either side.

Posted by: New Wave | May 18, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Hey New Wave: I’m all about enlightened discourse, not what we’ve got now – name-calling, contests for who loves the Constitution more, and windbags on TV and the Radio. Have you noticed how often, even the reputable TV news stations advertise a debate between icons of both sides of the spectrum as a heavy-weight fight? I don’t agree with your point about third parties – historically, the American system doesn’t seem to support them. They’re like bees; they sting once and then they die. That said, I typically vote for third parties (Green Party mostly) but I seem them more as an elongated lever from which you can move your party in the correct direction. So I guess, I don’t think they’ll work, but I hope so!

Posted by: map2history | May 18, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am

New Wave; The all time record highest budget deficit as well as the greatest increase in national debt occurred last year under president Obama. You might want to avoid that subject.

Posted by: gollywiggle | May 18, 2010, 11:20 am 11:20 am

My hope is that the renegade government will take a noticeable hit today.
I performed an oversimplified calculation to see what would be required to pay down the current level of debt. Assuming the interest rate to remain constant at two per-cent for 50 years is a part of that oversimplification. If the budget were balanced yesterday (fat chance) and we began to pay a half trillion dollars per year (approx one quarter of total revenue) on the debt it would take 50 years to pay off the debt.
So far I have only heard Obama speak (no action) of reducing the deficit. A reduced deficit only means we are charging less, the debt would still be increasing just at a slightly reduced rate. Obamacare is touted as the Rx for the deficit, but it failed to address Medicare “doc-fix” so that was a gross misrepresentation (especially considering current CBO estimates). It was also a ruse as I find many on the street do not understand that deficit and debt are not the same thing. Since the Obama/Pelosi/Reid triad are marching on a track that will continue trillion dollar plus deficits as far as we can see there is little hope that the debt can be paid down in 50 years, or in 100 years, or ever, for that matter.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | May 18, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am

map2history: Whatever form it takes, we need something that will encourage people on Congress to work for Americans. You are right about the daily ‘contests’ setup by the media to boost their ratings.

Posted by: New Wave | May 18, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am

map2history; I subscribe to the thinking that power corrupts and absolute power absolutely corrupts. New faces in Washington could do no more damage than the entrenched party serving, self serving, special interest serving politicians we have there now who are committed to their careers rather than the public service they were elected to perform. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the congress showed up one day and there was nothing for them to do because austerity had become the way of the land rather than thinking up ways to spend our money?

Posted by: gollywiggle | May 18, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am

The American people will show Obama and his clowns what is in store for them. You don’t listen to the majority you don’t get voted back in. Lifers, rhinos and puppets along with Pelosi and Reid will suffer defeats. May not be total but it will impact the future. The dem party is dead as it was known during JFK and dare I say Clinton. The dem party against business has helped cause the unemployment. They helped put buisness out by calling them evil and attacking their very existance. The dems party or the union party has killed their own. The very foundation of this country (THE BUSINESS OWNER)

Posted by: Jim Rod | May 18, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Gollywiggle: comments like yours never cease to amaze me. Can you identify the major contributors to last year’s budget deficit? I’ll wait for your response, but I won’t wait long.

Posted by: map2history | May 18, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Hey gollywiggle: identify the main contributors to last year’s budget deficit.

Posted by: map2history | May 18, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Richard Blumenthal is just another lying Democrat that tries to be all things to all people. They really don’t offer solutions to problems. What’s more important to them is pitting one group of Americans against the other to seize more power and control for government.
When will people learn?
The Last Tradition

Posted by: samuel gonzalez | May 18, 2010, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Notice Obama is staying away from Penn and Spectre? Guess the White House does not want him to become known as the kiss of death. Even Biden is staying away. Hell of a way to support your fellow Democrat who you Praised just a few weeks ago.

Posted by: stormerF3 | May 18, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Is Obama ever going to quit running for office and quit running America in the ground?

Posted by: cavscout | May 18, 2010, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

map —– You must mean the faux “stimulus” bill… of which the Dems still retain 60% to spend just before the next election!!!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | May 18, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

I wish Obama would go campaign for everyone one of “his” guys. So far he is 0-4, doesn’t realize how polarizing he is, and disliked. He liked to get his job and everything he has done so far just proves it.

Posted by: Tony T | May 18, 2010, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Republicans are so predictable. In their weird little world, no matter what happens today, it’ll be a loss for Obama. Funny, no matter what happens today, polls show people want Dems in control. And not matter what happens today, if Rand wins we’ll have a new American Nazi party on the rise. You betcha!

Posted by: pamp205 | May 18, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Didn’t take long for the media to strike back did it? Congratulations Mr. Paul. You are offically targeted from the White House.
Question: Would they even care if Palin hadn’t co-opted the Tea Party movement in the first place. Likely not… But that’s another story.

Posted by: CBA | May 20, 2010, 3:33 am 3:33 am

I think the admin of this website is really working hard for his website, because here every stuff is quality based stuff.

Posted by: Octavio Bent | December 10, 2011, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.