Afghanistan Progress ‘Slower’ Than Anticipated
In an EXCLUSIVE interview on “This Week,” CIA Director Leon Panetta said that making progress in Afghanistan is both “harder” and going more slowly than anticipated.
“There are some serious problems” in Afghanistan, Panetta said. “We’re dealing with tribal societies. We’re dealing with a country that has problems with governance, problems with corruption, problems with narcotics trafficking, problems with a Taliban insurgency,” he said.
But, the CIA director said, the U.S. is making progress in Afghanistan. “It’s harder, it’s slower than I think anyone anticipated. But at the same time, we are seeing increasing violence,” he told host Jake Tapper.
“Is the strategy the right strategy? We think so,” he said. “I think…the key to success or failure is whether the Afghans accept responsibility, are able to deploy an effective army and police force to maintain stability. If they can do that, then I think we’re going to be able achieve the kind of progress and the kind of stability that the President is after,” Panetta said.
“This is going to be tough. This is not going to be easy,” he said.
WATCH VIDEO HERE:
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
“Is the strategy the right strategy? We think so,” he said.
We “THINK” so? Billions of dollars and years after this war began, Panetta “THINKS” the strategy is right?
“There are some serious problems” in Afghanistan, Panetta said. “We’re dealing with tribal societies. We’re dealing with a country that has problems with governance, problems with corruption, problems with narcotics trafficking, problems with a Taliban insurgency,” he said.
Here’s what I THINK, Mr. Panetta. I THINK it’s NOT the right strategy. But, hey, what do I know? After all, Panetta seems to have the ability to sum up the huge battle we’re facing with this eloquent statement:
“This is going to be tough. This is not going to be easy,” he said.
Wow, now that’s deep.
Posted by: Shoe | June 27, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I thought YOUR president was supposed to bring them all home!
Posted by: blanco | June 27, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am
We were winning in Afghanistan when Bush was president. The military’s the same, the only difference is Obama is now calling the shots. Logically, therein lies the problem. Obama is now calling the shots!
Posted by: JustAGuy | June 27, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Unfortunately, I think the Intelligence Agencies in that arena are compromised. Remember, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”.
Posted by: Dawgnabox | June 27, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
If you actually closed with and destroyed the enemy using shock, firepower and maneuver, you might actually achieve some measure of success.
Rules of Engagement are for police, not military.
Look to Generals Sherman and Patton for your inspiration and you cannot lose.
Posted by: Denver | June 27, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Everywhere the CIA operates, those local drugs quickly appear on American streets. The CIA did not foresee the collapse of the Soviet Union, even though it was a dead, rotten, shell, that any MORON should have seen was collapsing. The CIA helped LIE us into Iraq.
I would like to know just who the CIA is really working for, and why it is not defunded and put to sleep.
The CIA has a LONG history ….. of being a disaster.
Posted by: Avery | June 27, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
When Obama followed his announcement about troop increase, in next sentence, with a exit date he sentenced thousands of American soldiers to death with no chance to win.
Take out the exit date and tell the enemy we are in it to win.
I hope this helps.
Posted by: shivas irons | June 27, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Why don’t the reporters bring the gruesome of war home on TV, like they did Vietnam.
Posted by: young_voter | June 27, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Unfortunately, those leading us were educated in institutions more interested in changing America and in stupid “political correctness” than teaching the facts of the world.
To win this or any other war in that general region, we need a leader who is versed in the methods and operations of the Ottoman Empire.
All else is folly.
Posted by: Wagnon | June 27, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Those people are ‘tribal’. I thought the US was crazy to even try to go into this country. Especially since Americans have no ‘stomach’ for war casualties. Ignorant as I am, even I knew from history that Afghanistan is impossible to ‘rule’. The British and Soviets at their heights couldn’t win in Afghanistan and Afghanistanis know this. They have no rules of engagement like us and they have no loyalties except to their tribes. Their goal is to win without any rules and they are ruthless fighters. It’s on their home territory which also gives them another huge advantage. Only Alexander the Great was able to subdue them briefly I believe by decimation. The US will most likely not be willing to do what works militarily (and break them) because they consider themselves to be too civilized.
Posted by: yathink | June 27, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
We vote for Obama to end the wars, create transparency and prosecute war criminals. He got the ring but only time will tell if like Frodo he can actually give up federal executive power.
Posted by: Donald Elliott | June 27, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
The sad thing is that we’re going to drop all of these lives and money only to inevitably get out in 3-5 years time… yep, believe me the politicians will stay in there because they’re pockets are full of defense contract $$$. And the poor Afghans that did get behind us are going to get hung by their throats when we leave.
Posted by: Chris | June 27, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Oh, like we needed those waste of spaces over at the CIA to tell us this??
Posted by: ChrisW | June 27, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am
So, remind me again why the USA started the war against the entire “tribal societies” of the country instead of just providing proof that Bin Laden was behind 911… which is what the Taliban asked for before turning him over to the USA back in 1991?
Posted by: Jay in Atlanta | June 27, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Yeah. Wars usually DO take longer, when you’re not allowed to kill anyone.
Posted by: Timothy L. Pennell | June 27, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Of course Tier One plan A it was the right strategy it was developed by them, the ROE, COIN/WHAM, 5 year plan, 400,000 ANSF, 25 year (2035) Taliban denial policy. We would have won. But counters are always in Tier Two Plan B OP Sandbag. Tier Three Plan C OP Meat Grinder.
Posted by: TCMSOLS | June 27, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Thanks obama,oh by the way,,,how’s your golf game,how’s that icey cup you’re licking,I’ll bet that hamburger you and the russian ate was good,yea,you work sooo hard guess you’ll be takin’ another vacation soon,boy am I glad you’re in the WH,it would be so boring if we had a president that worked at his job for his perks.
Posted by: bewolff | June 27, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am
im an ordinary afghan which grow up in that country.and for the last 10 years i read every single news about afghanistan.i im not agree with panetta about their stratagy.i dont think so that it is workable.they should to work more in pakistan than afghanistan which is the root cause and master mind of all problems which US is facing in afghanistan.some time there is one cause for many causes.i think curruption is the biggest factors for all the bloodshed. i remember i during king time one police with a stick far away in the rugged mountain of kunar was bringing the same trible people for any crime to the city ,so why not the whole world forces (NATO)cannot bring one warlord to justice.
Posted by: sayed | June 27, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Wasted Lives, wasted money and wasted good will.
Foreign wars are a disgrace! They do nothing to protect our way of life.
More blood, more hatred and more Military Ind Complex. Barf!
Posted by: johnl | June 27, 2010, 10:41 am 10:41 am
General McChrystal asks for 60,000 troops to win the Afghan war. Obama the GREAT military strategist waits MONTHS on end to sends ONE-HALF of that.
McChrystal and his aids blast the interloper President for his incompetence as soldiers die over a failed politically motivated war policy.
And McChrystal gets fired? It’s obvious that with all the blood on Obama’s hands after the criminally negligent policy he created… HE SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP.
Posted by: CFlyJuice | June 27, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
panetta is a slippery lying lawyer who knows nothing about intelligence
Posted by: farr | June 27, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Wow! Where has Leon Panetta been all this time? It does not take a brain surgeon to know that we are going backwards in Afghanistan. Yes… I hate to say it but we are back in Vietnam again. Generals with their hands tied and reporting to an incompetent Commander in Chief. If they wont let our military fight the way they are suppossed to, bring them home now.
Posted by: aveduck | June 27, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I am Afghani ex-patriot living in New York City.
.
I wish America hurry up and make it safe for me and brothers to come home and make lots of money. Why it take so many years for America to do this for me?
Posted by: Omar | June 27, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am
My son in law is deploying to Afghanistan in a few months. He is also becoming a father after he deploys. Now the change in command occurs. Do you think I am concerned? Of course I am. Any time the Political Command takes over War Planning we start on a slippery slope which can turn real bad. Remember a little conflict called Vietnam ? Same thing occurred, and Democrats for some reason are the ones who think they can call the shots for wars! Let the military commanders ask and GET what they need to do the job the 1st time. Then our boys will have a chance to FINISH THE JOB. Don’t we ever learn from the past mistakes ?? Semper-Fi
Posted by: Keith | June 27, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
The ‘problem’ Dognavox is the whole war is not doing anything for American Security. The Corporatists focuses the middle class on fake wars so they can make money. Mean while Investment Banks like Goldman Sachs, Jp Morgan, etc Banksters get free money from the Federal Reserve (0% interest)to bet on derivatives. Do you comprehend you are being distracted with this and the Iraq war? A rag tag army is kicking the Trillion dollar military industrial complex in the butt.
Posted by: Sean Hannity | June 27, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
USA has never been winning Dognavox. Go read a history book and turn off Fox News.
Posted by: Sean Hannity | June 27, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Low body count, big payday for MIC, endless warfare forever and ever, Amen….It’s the Federal bipartisan, special interests fluffing way.
Posted by: x32792 | June 27, 2010, 11:05 am 11:05 am
OH, THANK YOU, ABC — we all needed that wonderful picture and story about how CRAPPY everything is going, and now even “Afghanistan” is falling apart too!
The Gulf oil spill is horrendous, the jobs situation sucks, and our economy is still in the toilet, but ABC finds the time to make everyone feel even worse by reminding us that our “waffler-in-briefs” is an incapable boob in the military arena too!!
NICE!!
Posted by: Chisco | June 27, 2010, 11:09 am 11:09 am
The problem with this war is that there is nothing to win.Its like killing cockroaches,unless you burn down the house you just can,t kill them all.And I don,t feel we are trying to burn down the house.
Posted by: Tom | June 27, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am
How many more body bags will it take?
Posted by: William | June 27, 2010, 11:14 am 11:14 am
DID YOU ALL CATCH PANETTA’S COMMENT ABOUT CYBER SECURITY AT END OF INTERVIEW….FEAR, FEAR, FEAR WHEN OBAMA IS A FINGER AWAY FROM SHUTTING INTERNET DOWN…WHO ARE THESE FOOLS????????? DOES PANETTA (CIA BUSHIE) NOT KNOW WE AS AMERICANS ARE AWAKE TO THEIR NONSENSE AND FEAR!!! CYBER THREAT ON WAY PANETTA?? REALLY – JUST LIKE GOLDMAN AND BP CEO SELLS OFF STOCK 1 MONTH BEFORE SPILL…..INTERESTING….
Posted by: More lies | June 27, 2010, 11:14 am 11:14 am
All I can say is I thank God I convinced my sons to avoid the military like the plague…Our kids are nothing but cannon fodder for this government which has nothing on it’s mind other than it’s own self preservation. How does this government think it can control the Afgans, when it can’t/won’t control it’s own borders??? Laffable
Posted by: Mike S | June 27, 2010, 11:25 am 11:25 am
“There are some serious problems” in Afghanistan, Panetta said.
Yes and the symptom he omitted was that Afghanistan is 100% Islamic…Muslims get their marching orders from the Quran and the examples of Mohammad…Non believing invaders (crusaders) are not to be tolerated but driven off Muslim lands…
It is not possible for the crusaders to win the hearts and minds of Muslims…
That is a misdirection and a waste of lives, money and time…But we are not supposed to talk about ‘THAT’ are we?
Posted by: duh_swami | June 27, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
You cannot assure a win when the key is in the hands of someone else. Hope is not a course of action.
Wrong policy, Mr. Paneta.
Posted by: KCK | June 27, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Obama said he was going to “end the war” so, that’s that. I mean, the Taliban will hear he’s going to end it and they’ll just give up, right? I know the news says last month was the bloodiest in the war, and we’ve lost more soldiers since Obama took office than in all the years of prosecuting the war under Bush, but, hey, the cameras aren’t covering it. That means the war is over.
Posted by: Chico | June 27, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
“Afghanistan Progress ‘Slower’ Than Anticipated” sounds like the headlines regarding the economy, “Jobless claims ‘Higher’ than Anticipated”. This Obama administration is beyond incompetent and destroys everything it touches.
Posted by: Mat In New Orleans | June 27, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am
“Have you plugged the hole yet Daddy”…
Posted by: Mat In New Orleans | June 27, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
New American foreign policy “Talk to our enemies and sell them our friends” is not really new. American government has exercised this policy for many decades toward Israel. America has betrayed Israel on regular basis, even Bush did it twice, not mention Democrats, including Carter. In 1948, when Arab countries attacked Israel, it was not America who sent Israel military support, but the USSR. In 1973, when Israel was loosing the war and Golda Meir asked President Nixon for help with military equipment, Henry Kissinger, secretary of state, said “Let’s Israel to bleed”. Fortunately, Nixon made a right decision and sent weaponry. America, Democrats specifically, uses Israel as a bargain chip in ME policy and will sell it to global isalmofascism at any convenient moment. However, we must remember the recent history to understand the consequences. In 1938, Britain and France made Munich so called “peace” agreement with Hitler and sold to him Czechoslovakia in hope to get peace. In 1939, WWII was started. Stupidity of Britain and France is responsible for deaths of 55+ mln. people around the world, however, these countries have never learned their lesson and have not yet been put on trial in international court. By the way, palestinian muslims fought on Nazi side. In nuclear age, American policy toward Israel duplicating very recent bloody mistake can lead to deaths of hundreds of millions people, including Americans.
Posted by: Mark Bernadiner | June 27, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Panetta has less Intel experience than Austin Powers. Whats this Dem crony doing in charge of CIA? He is still looking for the Phone Booth entrance to Langley.
Posted by: Dennis D | June 27, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am
No kidding! Obama gives his generals half of the resources requested and politicians define the rules of engagement (RoE). What the heck do you expect?
Posted by: Dutra | June 27, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am
More insipid lies from O’Bumbler’s feckless flunky — there IS no ‘progress,’ only deepening defeat.
Posted by: Jim H. | June 27, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Define WIN. It can not be done in Afghanistan. There is no definition for WIN. We can not WIN in Afghanistan because WIN has no meaning. It is simple. There is no positive result for the effort – the lives and money we are spending. We are just “there” and we are the terrorists.
Posted by: Fedup | June 27, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Sean Hannity. THANK GOD there are at least a few people that have finally seen the light. Our military is an “economic” machine and if there are no wars the money stops flowing. Even hard core conservatives have a problem with this one. They want to be pro freedom “feel good” “if god won’t save you, we will”. And the one that hurts their pride to the core is that we’ve fought all these wars and lost all these men and women for no better reason than money. It’s like trying to get people on board with 911 truth…They flat don’t want to hear even the slightest possibility that there are some very dark forces “greed” at work here. I’m hoping that electing a few honest people can change this course, but, you have politicians like Roy Blunt in Missouri that is 100% conservative and curled up KNEE DEEP in the “Our National Security” scam. We can be anywhere in the world in a few hours, we have spy satelites and yet we need hundreds of Paradise Island military bases???? Ground troops don’t do anything but pick up bodies anymore. Bottom Line.. if the military is about “National Security” why aren’t they here protecting our borders from invasion ? Because it’s NOT real ! 1984 really is here and has been. We are all being led by the nose. Trust KNOWONE ! Vett the Vets, they could very well be plants grown and raised for this very moment.
Posted by: JoseRodreegeeese | June 27, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Panetta: ‘We’re dealing with a tribal society.’ Yeah, Leon, we’ll probably never get inside the heads of AIPAC. *sigh*
Posted by: Fawn Shannity | June 27, 2010, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Obama entered into this fight with a coalition of support from the right and left partly assembled with a promise to the left that the US forces had a hard timeline for withdrawal. In 2011 when that timeline is fast approaching, it will be difficult for the Obama administration to hold onto support from the left if he delays the date of withdrawal. Strategically, it makes sense for the Taliban to fight as hard as possible so as to make it even more difficult for Obama to hold onto his support from the left. Setting a deadline was perhaps the stupidest battle strategy in the last 500 years. Why should the Afghanis provide the American forces with any support in intelligence if the American forces are out in a year? The American forces will leave but informants will have to deal with those they conspired against by aiding the American forces. When body bags of American soldiers climb, and when Taliban reports of ‘innocent civilians’ slaughtered by American forces are provided to the international press, Obama will revert to cut and run in humilation or lose support from the left. One way or another, Obama will fold.
Posted by: Duude | June 27, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
I have supported this war all along but I have to acknowledge that It is a new VIETNAM war once again. We will lose this war.
Posted by: Henry Vu | June 27, 2010, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
First off, if you’ve never been to Afghanistan, you really don’t know what we’re dealing with. Imagine the American West circa 1800′s. You have some large population centers that are relatively peaceful and prosperous, and in between is “Indian Country”. If America really wants to “win” in Afghanistan, assuming the goal is to leave behind a peaceful and stable society, it is going to take a LONG time. Think, 20, 30, maybe even 50 years. Our experiences in the Philippines and South America don’t really equate because those are much smaller countries. Afghanistan is huge, has a widely dispersed population of varying ethnic groups, and of course there is always the major issue of religion. You will never completely eradicate the Taliban, the key is to marginalize them. If you can educate a generation of Children to not be susceptible to Taliban propaganda, on both sides of the border, then you win. If you can’t do that, then as soon as we leave, we lose. The problem with fundamentalists groups like the Taliban and Al Qaeda is that they have a huge pool of disaffected young males in Muslim societies, and even in the West, to recruit from. For anyone who thinks that leaving Afghanistan will fix anything, you are sadly mistaken. These guys want to take over the world. As ridiculous as that sounds, never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
Posted by: Mike | June 27, 2010, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Vietnam all over again.
Apparently they do either teach history in the US or learn from it.
Meanwhile Muslim extremists are emigrating to every country in the world.
All poor, a refusal to assimilate and revolution is now in the cards.
Machiavelli would be proud
Posted by: Jack | June 27, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Long before the world had to deal with muzzies Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan had slower progress than anticipated in those mountains and valleys. Our CIA and Special Forces did a great job of chasing the Taliban out-we should have left it up to the locals to do the rest. If they want a western style country they will have one-if they wish to be tribes they will do so. All we can do is lose young men. Come home.
Posted by: RobertG | June 27, 2010, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
This is just a diversion. a “Look Over Here” tactic. Every business and bank depend on the internet. “THEY” will not let him do it. Is he trying to draw attention away from the gulf? Or the fact that there’s proof HE is an illegal alien? Or his Big Bank deals? Or his failure in Afanistan? He’s has us tied up on new socialist ideas every day. Diversions, keep us from vetting our canidates maybe. I’m not sure, but rest assured, the tail is wagging it’s dog as a furious pace.
Posted by: JoseRodreegeeese | June 27, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Didn’t we learn anything from the Russians. The Russians lost! So will we.
Posted by: LFleming | June 27, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
What a fool! We knew about all these situations in Afghanistan. We helped them defeat the Russians!! We know more about their inner workings than anyone.
Posted by: Kevin | June 27, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
This WAR IS ABOUT THE MONEY ! 70% of the world’s natural gas reserves need to be pumped through Afganistan. And SOMEONE IS NOT COOPERATING. Come On People… there is BIG BIG MONEY IN WAR. Right now it’s all that’s holding our economy together. This is not even a war, it’s “an action”. I hope McCrystal blows the lid off this whole bad joke!
Posted by: JoseRodreegeeese | June 27, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
NOV’10 (D)-OUT!
Posted by: Partick Henry | June 27, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
We don’t belong there. Should have never gone there. Time to get out now.
US Government should stop CAUSING terrorism by invading & occupying countries, murdering innocents, torture, secret prisons, destruction, and plunder.
Posted by: LIB203 | June 27, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Panetta is a Democrat political hack. Who cares what he thinks/says?
A real CIA counter-terrorism expert said, in ParcBench last week: The Good War Counter-Insurgency–Colonize or Come Home.
Kent Clizbe reviews 20th century counter-insurgency operations (COIN), and points out that the only successful COINs were in colonies.
Total control of politics, economy and security are required for COIN. Successful COIN cannot happen in Afghanistan, where we trust (and fund) the locals to govern, run their economy, and provide security.
Either we do it with overwhelming, colonial-style, benevolent imperial power, or we Come Home.
That’s the choice that faces Obama and his geniuses. They asked for the job. Let them make the decision.
Posted by: Colonize or Come Home! | June 27, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
As we can vote them in, we should be able to vote them out “immediately” without going through the impeachment process. This is why they don’t want us to simply be able to vote via our computers. It would open the possiblity that we could have an easy way to vote them out “at any time” once we’ve figured out we’ve been lied to. Zero would have been gone in the first “100 days”. I believe this is what is needed to keep our politicians on task as far as what WE want and not what Big Business wants. Can I get an AMEN !
Posted by: JoseRodreegeeese | June 27, 2010, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
According to Mr Panetta, young Americans are dying in Afghanistan for “stability” which makes pefect sense given our commander in chief’s distaste for the “War on Terror.”
Posted by: Cowboy Diplomat | June 27, 2010, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
WE Can’t afford it ! Let the rest of the world take care of itself for a change. Why even try to “protect” the freedoms of people who hate us? I say get out and protect our own borders. Let the Military Idustrial Complex sell their hardware somewhere else.
Posted by: JoseRodreegeeese | June 27, 2010, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
I am very conservative, and I have said from the beginning that the war in Afghanistan is a mistake! The country’s terrain is nothing like the flat table top desert of Iraq, which is perfect for armored vehicles and tank fighting. The people are not as fractious as Afghanistan, and are willing to work with us to help then secure a more moderate government.
Afghanistan is mountainous and the people hostile to everyone-especially outsiders! They might hate each other, but will band together to destroy invaders. They are like stone-age people, very backward and hostile. This place eats armies even highly technologically advanced ones; and as you can see it always, always comes down to boots on the ground taking and securing territory. that bit of truth hasn’t changed for 4,000 years! Unless we are committed to hunt down the terrorists in Pakistan with massive bombing and accept thousands of civilian casualties, I am afraid it is virtually impossible to destroy the Taliban. They are like an aggressive form of cancer, that even when you think you have cut away enough of the disease, or irradiated it to death,there are always a few cells alive that will grow to eventually takeover the body and kill it.
Afghanistan is a mistake; as it is needlessly killing our people, draining our treasury, and destroying our National will to fight.
Afghanistan is the mistake, and not Iraq. If we are going to fight terrorism, let’s either fight with the gloves off-No stupid Rules of Engagement-just kill them all, or leave them be.
Posted by: RHF | June 27, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Guys, we won in Iraq where we took a nation totally anti-American with an evil dictator, and destroyed him and turned a Muslim country into a democracy, the only democracy in that area of the world (a huge victory for Bush but the media will never admit it). Afghanistan provides us no benefit, I say we give their leaders the weapons and air support they need to fight the Taliban along with some Special Services personnel, and get out!
Posted by: Vince Hugh | June 27, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
This so-called war is a “DISASTER”…Almost like another Vietnam…We will NOT defeat these “Guerilla Fighters” as they are masters at what they do and they do NOT fight by conventional means….We will just keep losing more young men at a very high cost, in terms of blood and $$$…Time to come home!!
Posted by: Make my day | June 27, 2010, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
No one has ever held Afghanistan, ever, This goes back to Alexander the Great. The country is a backward, stone age, splintered mess and is not going to change. That said, the Taliban has to go. You can’t have a sudo government allowing the training and funding of terrorists attacking the western world and do nothing about it. No easy answers here. Someone need to make a hard decision here and hopefully a good. I don’t see that coming from this administration.
Posted by: who cares | June 27, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
This “exclusive” interview is all PR and no substance. The former president said repeatedly from the start that the war would take “generations” and the average person with their mind on the pulse of history knew it too. How, then, is this war “harder and slower than anyone anticipated”? “Generations” is pretty slow already, what’s slower than that? This is merely designed to assuage our concerns. We take what we read and see at face value every time and debate substance where there is none.
Posted by: joe | June 27, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Our leaders and pundits all agree that leaving the Middle East will result in the “unthinkable,” ie, nuclear war.
Well, it’s time to think the unthinkable. We need to get out of the region and let the games begin. In short order, the Taliban and their surrogates will attack Pakistan first, then head for Saudi Arabia. Iran (in cahoots with Hamas and others) will attack Israel and, should it be mortally wounded, Israel will launch most if not all of her nuclear arsenal, turning the region into a charcoal briquette.
Power abhors a vacuum, as they say. So there would be no restrain against the U.S. and a consortium of allies going into the Middle East rubble (wearing Haz-met suits) and pumping out the oil until the cows come home – with a certain percentage set aside for repopulating and resettling the region (note: there are more than enough Jews, Arabs and Persians living outside the region to return and do things right, or at least without theocratic rule).
Yes, nuclear war would be catastrophic. But it is not unthinkable (Japan, anyone?) And it is the only real solution to the religious-based conflict (determing who leads the Muslim religious parade) that has raged there over 2000 years.
Posted by: Daniel Williams | June 27, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Sad to say, the harsh and hard to hear reality is…
Obama is a very poor commander in chief.
I know some will argue against that, but it is beyond obvious now.
He seldom even speaks about the war, won’t call it a war, and even the word “victory” is never used.
Sad times.
Posted by: Jack Burton | June 27, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I dont care if it’s Vermont, you dont defeat anybody by telegraphing your “go home” date. Obama is dumb as a post and his stupidity is killing our soldiers needlessly.
Posted by: Dennis Math | June 27, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Maybe if Bush & Co. had a clue, they could have left Obama & Co. with an exit strategy. You would think that after 7 years looking for Waldo bin Laden that the Bush administration would have the responsibility to have a plan.
Nope, no plan. Just a hot potato tossed to Obama. Blame Obama for everything Bush did – or refused to dob.
Posted by: Dubya | June 27, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
As for all the comments about “nobody has ever held Afghanistan, all the way back to Alexander the Great”. It’s probably because nobody wanted to “hold” the place. It is one of the most unliveable places on the planet and since we will allow them to keep their religeous practices, I sure don’t see us ever making it a tourist “Mecca”.
We could have defeated the power structure even at the tribal level if our ignorant President wasn’t so stupid as to telegraph our departure date. Now the only reason we are there is for the purpose of needlessly killing our own troops while the tribal heads await our departure.
I have a dog that could beat Obama in Chess. That “Kenyan Boob” is as dumb as a box of rocks and the deaths of a lot of troops for needless purposes are on his head. Carter is a “Lincoln” compared to “Obama the Clueless Moron”.
Posted by: Dennis Math | June 27, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
When are we going to DEMAND that OUR TROOPS COME HOME ALIVE???? This is pathetic that we Americans just go on living our lives while OUR SOLDIERS ARE DYING NEEDLESSLY! WAKE UP AMERICA!
Posted by: Sally J | June 27, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Afghanistan = Viet Nam
Pitiful that the USA is incapable of learning from its own experience.
Posted by: Truth | June 27, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Change we can believe in?
Posted by: Truthsayer | June 27, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The Taliban and Bin Laden followers are in the country and its where all the arms and bombs should have been put to get them. Iraq was never involved in the 9-11 attacks and kept Iran busy. We wasted too much of our resources there making select private industries prosper while dragging down the economy for everyone else.
Posted by: WTC | June 27, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Does anyone really believe anything this stuffed shirt says? They really must be that delusional thinking people believe this propoganda. We are there to make certain companies rich, to grow the opium so the C.I.A. has lots of budget money, This is all about GREED and nothing else and we all suffer for it.
Posted by: Sideeous | June 27, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Does anyone really believe anything this stuffed shirt says? They really must be that delusional thinking people believe this propoganda. We are there to make certain companies rich, to grow the opium so the C.I.A. has lots of budget money, This is all about GREED and nothing else and we all suffer for it.
Posted by: Sideeous | June 27, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
We were winning in Afghanistan when Bush was president. The military’s the same, the only difference is Obama is now calling the shots. Logically, therein lies the problem. Obama is now calling the shots!
Posted by: JustAGuy | June 27, 2010, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
If we had followed Charlie Wilson’s advice for a plan similar to the Marshall plan for Afghanistan after they expelled the Russians from their country we might not have as much of a problem today.
No doubt, some of the weapons we helped the Afghans get for use against the Russians are now being used by the Taliban against us.
Posted by: Bill Snyder | June 27, 2010, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Obama’s Vietnam.
Posted by: Archy Cary | June 27, 2010, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Hmmph. Maybe had we listened to the general and gave him MORE resources than the minimum he said he needed for success in Afghanistan, we might be seeing different result today.
Instead, someone relied on politics in his role as commander-in-chief, gave the military less resources than was asked, under-cut the effort by putting a termination date; now we’re forced to concede that “things are tougher than anticipated….”
Go figure.
Posted by: chris | June 27, 2010, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Slower than expected?
Could it be that Obama’s CIA has 2 informants and both work for Sheik bin Laden as Obama blows up civilians.
Could it be because Obama imported all those Pakistani terrorists last year with McChrystal.
Could it be that US Soldiers are not allowed to have their weapons loaded under Obama and terrorists get to shoot first.
This Obama regime has done nothing but undermine Karzai’s Government, get Americans murdered, trusted terrorists and has made Afnminstan War Lord central in the guns and bribes handed out.
Faisal Shahzad was a created Obama terrorist due to Obama’s Predator policy in the region. There are millions more now like him coming to America due to Obama Muslim tribal warfare.
Bush 43 won Afghanistan, the British mismanaged it and Obama has turned it into another catastrophe.
McChrystal dithered it for Obama and got out as he didn’t want to be a scapegoat for the regime.
Problem is American Soldiers can’t get out, Patraeus is stuck in it, and Americans can’t get out because the Obama terrorists are coming inside America where they live.
Posted by: Lame Cherry | June 27, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Call Obama – Forest Gump, stupid is stupid does. Obama can’t even say we are in a war, its shows and the bad guys are taking advantage of it. Obama’s ‘wave the white flag’ rules of engagement politics, it’s a wonder we have lost more men and women in Afgjhamnistan. Our soldiers can’t even return fire unless command ok’s it. What are we doing there?
Posted by: Wendle | June 27, 2010, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
So the CIA chief says that the going is harder than he thought? Does anyone realize that this man has no intelligence experience? NONE. And he was chosen to run the CIA. Any reader of Afghan history probably knows more about the difficulties faced there than he does. How in the world did we end up with so many people in positions they have no business being in?
Posted by: cysusa | June 27, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
War? Who cares?
If anyone is stupid enough to enlist they’re too stupid to be missed anyway.
Posted by: Robert Natale | June 27, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
In response to Robert Natale’s comment “War? Who cares? If anyone is stupid enough to enlist they’re too stupid to be missed anyway.”
I give you this “War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.”
John Stuart Mill
English economist & philosopher (1806 – 1873)
-From an Enlisted Marine that is too stupid for anyone to care about…
Posted by: Semper Fi | June 27, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Whatever happened to the “pull out now” Obama slappys?
Posted by: John Q Public | June 27, 2010, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
i love how panetta looks to his right and covers his face when he mentions the ‘narcotics’ problem. his body language makes clear he is hiding something.
Posted by: zeev | June 27, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
When Obama says were fighting a war against Muslim extremists, then maybe just maybe we have a chance over there. I still believe he’s a Muslim mole that is destroying our nation, Bring them all back and put them on the borders.
Posted by: Mudbug | June 27, 2010, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
This is the leakiest administration ever. For several months we’ve been loudly announcing that the Kandahar offensive will begin in June. I can only assume that this was done to show what a take-charge president for the cheapest of political reasons to prop up an inept and inexperienced CIC and show the American people what a take charge president we have. With months to recruit, arm and prepare, clearly, they were ready for our troops.
Posted by: sherryww | June 27, 2010, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
We need George Bush back in office.
At least when people were pointing their fingers at him, he deserved all the blame.
Somebody else has to clean up his mess, and it’s all their fault.
Posted by: Robert | June 27, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Robert,what mess? Have you noticed the Afghan casualty numbers since Obama took office?Are the results any better than when Bush ran the show? What was the unemployment rate when Obama was inaugurated?What is it now almost 18 months later?The man is no leader, no manager and not particularly intelligent,despite the propaganda.If he is so smart,why wasn’t he a Phi Beta Kappa? And quiet flows the oil…
Posted by: Nephron | June 27, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
What the hell are we doing in Afghanistan, a 100% muslim country? These countries can’t be defeated and sure as hell won’t ever be a friend of a western country. Makes you wonder if our muslim CIC is intentionally sending our good troops over there just to get slaughtered?
Posted by: Lord Wallace | June 27, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Rise up fellow hippies and stop Obama’s illegal wars..Power to the people..
Posted by: TJ Jackson | June 27, 2010, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Do we need to lose 500K casualties as in Vietnam before we get out?.
Hey we are now buddy buddy with the vietnamese commies cuz they are giving us coroprations thousands of educated workers for a few hundred dollars per month.
Get out and the afghans will hire us companies to rebuild.
Posted by: anti war allways | June 27, 2010, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Maybe it was a typo? or maybe you don’t have your facts correct but it was 56,000 soldiers, sailors, airman and marines who gave the ultimate sacrifice not 500,000.
Posted by: liberty | June 27, 2010, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Follow the money…We,the people, taxpayer, are being used up…we have failed the litmus test of history…some were just too stupid to learn from the failures of Stalin or Hitler or perhaps they think THEY can do it better.
Posted by: IraqVet | June 28, 2010, 12:06 am 12:06 am
You people have to have patience. These Wars take time. And when you’re not allowed to fire your weapon at the enemy, it takes longer still.
Posted by: Timothy L. Pennell | June 28, 2010, 6:55 am 6:55 am
Fight this war or bring them home.
We are not going to win hearts and minds. Unleash the military, kill the enemy and come home. We loose more men waiting to get the ok to return fire from some bozzo in a suit behind a desk. Turn them loose, do the job and bring them home. Do not bother rebuilding. Let them do it.
Posted by: Fight or come home | June 28, 2010, 8:38 am 8:38 am
lol,
Our glorious mercenaries fighting against neanderthal cavemen and going nowhere with all the so called progressive and high technology we have…gawd save us if those jokers ever have to fight against a real army not sand fleas and Bedouin in Iraq and neanderthals in Afghanistan
Posted by: John | June 28, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
So… what they are saying is that all that crap obamalamadingdong was spewing during the campaign about how he could fix all this was really just that…crap?
Posted by: David | June 28, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
It’s not “harder and slower” than **anyone** anticipated – it’s harder and slower than the current administration had a clue about when they show-boating about getting out by 2011. (At least it sounded good on the campaign trail!!)
Posted by: Jeremy | June 28, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Obama’s Vietnam. Now maybe he gets why Bush didn’t rush in there. (Probably not.)
Posted by: LDC | June 28, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
The US has been prosecuting numerous imperialistic wars behind the guise of “fighting insurgent-terrorists”. You could venture to guess 60 TRILLION has been spent these last 9 years. Because ?14%…?12 million Americans are long term unemployed for 1 and 2 years? Because how many businesses and companies are bankrupt or out of business? These financial political decisions are insane…psychotic…non-sustainable. So what happens if the American people do not stop these decisions by Washington? Does Middle America collapse? Does homelessness expand exponentially? Does violence explode? Do Mexican illegals take over the SW United States? Will there be a large die off of population due to malnutrition; starvation and disease? There are almost no jobs. Many of the middle class (blue-pink-white collar) have not worked for 1 and 2 years. Many businesses and companies are barely keeping their doors open or their lights on for business. A toxic oil spill is killing the Gulf waters in columns and zones for decades-generations and A toxic oil spill is killing the Atlantic waters for decades-generations. NOW is the time to create an economy around Global-sustainable-environmental ENERGY management. NOW is the time to create jobs in ELECTRIC: pantograph-trains, Nuclear, Wind, Solar, Hydro, and alternate fuels. The US is more than 30 years behind the oil peak schedule for a survivable transition away from crude. The US has to take care of itself.
The internal economic meltdown and no jobs….
This is the perfect time to move jobs to a new energy grid,
to garner momentum from the deepwater oil tragedy
that is killing the Gulf and the Atlantic oceans.
Anyone that still wants deepwater drilling is in psychotic denial
of the dead zone that used to be the Gulf and the Atlantic oceans.
Posted by: Barb Gantt | June 28, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
John, I hate to be the bearer of bad news. While I agree with you that these are a backward ppl, these “neanderthal cavemen” that our brave soldiers are up against are a far more more ominous opponent than any army we have ever faced.
Posted by: Tunnel-vision | June 28, 2010, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
We must accept that what we are up against is only in part Taliban, which is corrupted reactionary movement that has only recently been adopted by the Afghan ppl. What we are truly up against is a rugged, war-hardened, and stubbornly independent Pusthun people that have throughout history violently rebuked foreign invaders, even if the cost is their own lives. We arent fighting a load of bedouins or dumb camel herders, were fighting a people who’ve been at war constantly for millenia. They are experienced fighters with a long history of waging guerrilla warfare against invaders.
They are one of the few remaining people on this earth that follow a highly principled code of life (look up “Paktunwali”). These are the same Mujahideen, freedom fighters, than Rambo fought alongside in Rambo III against the Russians. Included in the many civilizations they have fought are Alexander the Great, who in a letter to his mother, described the inhabitants of what is now Afghanistan as lion-like brave people: ” I am involved in the land of a ‘Leonine’ (lion-like) and brave people, where every foot of the ground is like a well of steel, confronting my soldier. You have brought only one son into the world, but Everyone in this land can be called an Alexander.
More recently, they defated the British Empire (twice), and then the Russians. Now they are fighting Us.
If we want to follow the plight of the USSR, we can embrace the Kill ‘em All attitude that the more ignorant members of our citizenry espouse. Like USSR, our civilization, namely the economy, is already showing unhealthy signs of strain. If we want to actually win the war, we must essentially “convert” them. This can only be done by showing them humanity….ie humanitarian aid, schools for boys AND girls, hospitals, and infrastructure….without an imperialist agenda. The only greater vulnerability than its inability to provide these basic needs, is the Taliban’s dependency to villainize the west to survive.
Posted by: Tunnel-vision | June 28, 2010, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm