EXCLUSIVE: Bill Gates: ‘We’ll have more crises like the oil spill’ if we don’t invest in clean energy innovation
In an exclusive interview on “This Week,” Bill Gates, the co-founder and chairman of Microsoft, called for a dramatic increase in federal funding for clean energy innovation and warned of significant consequences – more environmental crises, oil supply disruptions, increased energy costs and climate change – if the United States fails to embrace the challenge of finding cheaper, cleaner energy.
Gates said the United States should invest $16 billion a year in energy research and development – $11 billion more than it currently spends – to find “real solutions” to our energy problems.
“What we’re talking about is about one percent of what the United States spends on energy being devoted to R&D,” Gates said. If we spend that one percent, he said, the U.S. “can tap into the unique ability in this country, through its universities, national labs [and] entrepreneurs, to give us a form of energy that is both cheaper, not dependent on foreign supply and is environmentally designed so that we’re not emitting carbon and getting into the climate change problem.”
Gates warned of the consequences of not investing in energy research: “We’ll have more crises like the oil spill and we’ll have the supply disruption. We’ll start to see more and more effects of the climate problem,” Gates advised.
“The costs will go up because you’re looking for oil in harder and harder places. … So you’ll just be paying more and more. And so it’s an implicit tax. If you don’t innovate, it’s this gigantic cost that we’ll be paying,” he said.
“I’m just so clear that this is a great investment and…plays to America’s strength,” Gates explained. “This is what we do well.”
Gates spoke to host Jake Tapper after announcing his new report, “A Business Plan for America’s Energy Future”, with other top American business executives.
The report calls for a substantial increase in spending on energy innovation research and development by the government. It insists the status quo is unsustainable. “Most of the technologies that underlie the current energy system were invented decades ago,” the report said, “and are increasingly costly, brittle, and incompatible with a clean future.”
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Liberals are exploiting the oil spill to inject their personal pet environmentalist experiments onto America. This is nothing less than fear mongering to politically legislate even more sweeping political legislation onto Americans. In our current economy sweeping widespread liberal experiments is the last thing we need. America needs to get PRODUCING with those resources we ALREADY HAVE. The only politics that needs to be playing out right now with energy production in America is the loosening of strict regulations on commercial fishing, logging, land based ONSHORE drilling, etc.
The liberal mentality of preserve what we have while use OTHER nation’s resources is selfish and reminds me of a rich miser hoarding his own resources.
Posted by: EPU | June 12, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
There’s nothing wrong with land based on shore drilling. As soon as this oil spill occurred I knew immediately that liberals would exploit it as another fear mongering anti-oil drilling campaign.
Every time a disaster occurs, it knee-jerks liberals into doing a belly flop on our country – especially on restricting America’s production.
And you ask why many of us believe that liberals are ruining our country?
Posted by: EPU | June 12, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Oh bummer. I was going to comment on a very good post that has been deleted.
Christopher Carr, repost without long cut and pastes and links! Your post was very thoughtful and spot on.
Posted by: progressive mama | June 12, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Posted by: Christopher Carr
—
Quick thought, Mr Carr. I’ve never thought much about the incredible pressures under the sea but at 5000′ water pressure is 2200psi. That’s a whole lot of constant energy. Has no one ever considered devising a method of harnessing that energy to create electricity?
Posted by: smartlillena | June 12, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
now now everyone, Obama is “trying” to look like he cares. after all wasn’t that Obama that said offshore drilling is ok and accidents very rarely happen on oil rigs..if fact he gave them a safety award….maybe he should do what MSNBC said he should do.. go back down to LA and eat some shrimp with the people.. LMAO
Posted by: This IS Obamas Katrina | June 12, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
.. go back down to LA and eat some shrimp with the people.. LMAO
———–
Doesn’t seem very much funny to laugh at in this situation. Not sure why you bother to say it’s so hilarious. Perhaps its you that doesn’t really care.
Posted by: Task | June 12, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Why doesn’t Bill Gates use his own frickin’ money to create alternative energy research and companies if he thinks it’s so important and such a good deal?
But no, he wants the taxpayers to kick in the bucks…while he shields and hides income. Talk is cheap, Mr. Gates!
Posted by: Not Chicken Little | June 12, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Task (or is it tierra/sue/or alyson today?):
Do you mean like the email jokes and photocrops we saw for years about katrina?
The fact is, Obama just weeks before the off shore oil drilling disaster stated he was going to expand offshore oil drilling. He made no mention of changing the safety regs so his plans to drill offshore would have been under the same regs as those during the disaster. Now he has the nerve to blame Bush for this disaster blaming outdated regs that Obama wasn’t willing to improve?
Obama is just ducking and covering. He really doesn’t care about anything except deflecting blame to keep the media pumping out the phony image of himself as “Mr. cool hand luke”. Obama is in way over his head and he is scrambling to save face.
Posted by: EPU | June 12, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
I will be glad when the revolutionaries like Van Jones sieze his money and drive his women and children before them .
Posted by: nat turner | June 12, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Looks like Billy Gates is in on the Climate Exchange Inc scam too…
I guess being a billionaire is so passe` when you can scam the world and become a TRILLIONAIRE!!!
Posted by: katy | June 12, 2010, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
“I guess being a billionaire is so passe` when you can scam the world and become a TRILLIONAIRE!!!”
Yeah, like cap and trade supporters stand to make money while big polluters won’t make anything by continuing to pump megatons of carbon into the air unabated and dump the consequences on everybody else for free….
Posted by: Skip | June 12, 2010, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Seems Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins sent Allen and Salazar and hence little Obama a letter about all that boom dated May 21st!
Somebody’s lying and somebody is letting them get away with lies.
Posted by: CLN | June 12, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
O.K., let us have Bill Gates apply his personal genius as he “did” for the PC. Invent is the most stupid word in the world. Invent? Is that the entire point in the universe? The left refuses to see and certainly the progressives don’t care but will use whatever is at their disposal to destroy America. You cannot invent anything this moment that can help our energy needs for the next two decades, at least. And if something were to be, invented, the enviros would fight it tooth and nail. There will be some special interest group to fight whatever might be invented now or in the future.
Posted by: Sue | June 12, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Somebody’s lying and somebody is letting them get away with lies.
Posted by: CLN | Jun 12, 2010 7:37:24 PM
More like somebody is implying somebody else is lying to make political hay. Typical Republican smear tactic.
Posted by: Dan | June 12, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
You cannot invent anything this moment that can help our energy needs for the next two decades, at least.
Posted by: Sue | Jun 12, 2010 8:08:32 PM
The bigger danger is the neanderthals who think everything is ‘just fine’ as it is – big oil, banking and the military industrial power structure.
Fortunately we have cutting edge scientists working for a better future despite the Republican right.
Posted by: Dan | June 12, 2010, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
The best guide so far as to what went wrong is contained in a report produced by the Deepwater Horizon Study Group, led by Professor Robert Bea of the Center for Catastrophic Risk Management at the University of California, Berkeley. In his report, dated 20 May, he itemises seven steps which led to the blowout. They are worth quoting in full:
“Improper well design
* Improper cement design…
* No cement bond logs, ineffective oversight of operations
* Bad decision-making – removing the pressure barrier – displacing the drilling mud with sea water 8,000ft below the drill deck…
* Early warning signs not detected, analyzed or corrected
* Improper operating procedures
* Flawed design and maintenance of the final line of defense.”
All cement issues = Halliburton.
Posted by: Chuckie | June 12, 2010, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Looks like Billy Gates is in on the Climate Exchange Inc scam too…
Posted by: katy | Jun 12, 2010 7:21:51 PM
I recall Bill Gates was invited by Ted Kennedy, the strongest advocate of amnesty of Illegals, to the U.S. Senate to pitch about the need for increase in import of foreign scientists and engineers.
If Bill Gates was willing to spend a small amount of his wealth on solving the problem of deep sea oil spill prevention and stoppage, we may not have the gulf disaster today.
Posted by: austin | June 12, 2010, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
“If Bill Gates was willing to spend a small amount of his wealth on solving the problem of deep sea oil spill prevention and stoppage, we may not have the gulf disaster today”
What? Do you think the oil companies are too strapped for cash to do their own safety R&D or something? You have got to be kidding.
Posted by: Skip | June 12, 2010, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
The ultimate free market opportunist is calling for tax dollars to spur innovation? Something stinks to high heaven here.
Posted by: Woody | June 12, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
“Something stinks to high heaven here”
Only if you think good government policy and free market entrepreneurship is somehow mutually exclusive.
Posted by: Skip | June 12, 2010, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
What? Do you think the oil companies are too strapped for cash to do their own safety R&D or something? You have got to be kidding.
I do believe that U.S. , government and industries, should build up their own technologies regarding deep sea drilling, rather than depend on one foreign company to provide safety of spill on our land. Do you think we have no money to do that ? A lot of engineers and scientists are looking over work of this kind.
Posted by: austin | June 12, 2010, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Government investment in R&D has a proven track record of paying off. From the internet to sequencing the human genome to our world-leading universities (California alone is the equal or better of any country in the world for research universities), it is hard to argue the facts.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 12, 2010, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Jack Tapper, you surely know that a bunch of nonsense and politically biased people follow your report.You should not be surprised because you report sometimes something to get attention from them.I understand this is our journalism now a days.
Posted by: azby | June 13, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am
I agree with Bill Gates, but an improved national energy framework and investment in clean energy innovation requires some sacrifices and inconveniences and costs– and cowardly “conservative” policymakers (both Republican and ConservaDem, fully invested in conserving the status quo) would rather stick with the status quo, no matter how failed, never mind national security, oil independence versus dependence, America’s global competitiveness, job creation potential, global warming science, the environment, public health, Pascal’s gambit, the future and so on.
We need to do a better job of truly getting rid of the cowards in office.
Posted by: progressive mama | June 13, 2010, 1:21 am 1:21 am
requires some sacrifices and inconveniences and costs
—
We went down the “trust me” road with HC and the cost of that of that disaster is still growing. (doc fix?) Bill Gates and Barak Obama won’t be inconvenienced nor will they sacrifice a damn thing. Nor will their families.
Obama, himself, just last week, sent a quarter million people looking for jobs that aren’t there. He took those people’s livlihoods from them as if it were nothing. As if they and their families were spittle on his tie.
So, no more “trust me”. Tell us the complete truth. How much more does he think we’re supposed to “sacrifice”?
Posted by: smartlillena | June 13, 2010, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Posted by: smartlillena | Jun 13, 2010 2:09:34 AM
So you disagree with Gates, and you disagree with me when I say, “an improved national energy framework and investment in clean energy innovation requires some sacrifices and inconveniences and costs– and cowardly “conservative” policymakers (both Republican and ConservaDem, fully invested in conserving the status quo) would rather stick with the status quo, no matter how failed, never mind national security, oil independence versus dependence, America’s global competitiveness, job creation potential, global warming science, the environment, public health, Pascal’s gambit, the future and so on”?
Or are you just looking for an opportunity to wave a fist in the air and whine about Obama?
Posted by: progressive mama | June 13, 2010, 2:19 am 2:19 am
That is why the Silicon Valley entrepreneurs are usually Democrats. The Republicans have nothing to offer.
As for the cost some people are complaining about, it only takes one $3T war to drive your whole economy into the ground, as W. has proved. Clean energy would provide real jobs and a long-term low cost energy source, not that the Republicans would ever concern themselves with that until an oil spill occurs.
Posted by: Jim | June 13, 2010, 7:45 am 7:45 am
Gates is right, of course, to speak up for energy innovation/alternative energy applications. His proposed amount, however, seems low … very low.
But let’s kick in another billion to pay for independent counsels who will hold accountable, finally, corrupt government officials who have criminally mismanaged and misdirected energy, security, etc.
Posted by: mirth | June 13, 2010, 8:19 am 8:19 am
“That is why the Silicon Valley entrepreneurs are usually Democrats. The Republicans have nothing to offer.”
Really? What is your source of such a wild statement? How about Meg Whitman or Vinod Khosla to name just a couple of well known Republican entrepreneurs?
Posted by: Sigmonde | June 13, 2010, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Most of us already knew this. Others with similar wealth have already said this and some have even made attempts to work towards energy independence for oil.
If Gates is so smart why did it take him so long to get to this point? Why is the media acting like God has delivered the stone tablet to Gates? Especially since Gates is the person who pushed the job outsourcing in the computer field which has resulted in most of our economic insecurity and instability problems in the while collar fields of work.
Posted by: jan | June 13, 2010, 8:58 am 8:58 am
So called CLEAN ENERGY is a FAILURE – ask Spain and Germany, who’ve together wasted billions on this pipe dream pushed by academics, “green politicians” and the dreamy eyed mega rich like Gates while laughed at by professional engineers who know better. They know the energy in quantities and at PRICES we need can only be provided by Coal, Hydro Electric and Nuclear power plants. Everything else is a WASTE OF MONEY and a PROSPERITY TAX that makes EVERYTHING move expensive, provides no effect on the GLOBAL WARMING NONSENSE while KILLING JOBS and LOWERING OUR STANDARD OF LIVING. You think the academics and democrats know something special about “science”? Ask yourself who paid BILLIONS for the ABANDONED AND HALF BUILD E85 ETHONAL PLANTS sprinkled around the mid west before these nitwits figured out E85 has only 65% of the energy of gasoline and it’s a TOTAL FAILURE and can’t be transported by pipeline? YOU DID!! Unless neophyte obama convinces the UNITED STATES that if enough of our paychecks are used to pay for a MASSIVE INCREASE IN ENERY COSTS because what we buy will CHANGE THE EARTH’S CLIMATE, they we are being RIPPED OFF BY DEMOCRAT LIES. ….think prices are high now – democrat ignorance is about to cost us all dearly….
Posted by: shepard147 | June 13, 2010, 9:37 am 9:37 am
In these days of economic crisis and ridiculously high deficits it seems pure folly to be earmarking more taxpayer money for “green” technology. Spain has already shown us how futile “green” jobs and the infrastructure that surrounds them can be.
Can we get our finances in order first before we try and tackle the highly debatable question of climate change.
Posted by: J.R. | June 13, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Mr. Gates…what rock have you been sleeping under the past 20 years, the alternatives are ready to go but every time they get close the US Government never follows through, the say we need to get off of the oil addiction but where is the follow up….have you heard even a peep about conserving or worse yet the promises made by the bailed out auto makers who took money on condition of making high mileage new technology vehicles…none have and in fact all are back to selling their bigges profit gas guzzlers and the wind energy that was supposed to put Americans back to work is being made not in the US but in Brazil and China and that funding has dried up as well…bottom line, you want it you need to support it or do it yourself and quit relying on a failed Government and a lying INEPT President
to do it for you!
Posted by: CC | June 13, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am
So why doesn’t Bill Gates and his other billionaire friends invest their own money?
Posted by: rkm63 | June 13, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Or are you just looking for an opportunity to wave a fist in the air and whine about Obama?
Posted by: progressive mama
—-
No maam. At least, I hope I’m not. I gave you a good example of a program that became law through bald-faced lies. Call them accounting tricks, politics, whatever you want. They were lies from the very beginning and there is no debate about that. It’s already over $1 billion and not even implemented.
And he wants to spend another $billion$?
All I said was tell the complete truth from the outset and share the pain equally.
Posted by: smartlillena | June 13, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am
So you disagree with Gates, and you disagree with me when I say,
—
A standard response would be “show me something”. That’s always a bogus response, no matter who uses it. But this country can’t afford to borrow another $billion$ to spend on words and dreams. No more than Al Gore deserves a $billion$ for selling time shares in dead air while I pay $100 to fill my pickup. I can afford that. But these empty words lead me to believe I’ll see that same tank of fuel cost $300. Gates, Gore and Obama can afford that, I can’t.
It’s basically an well funded mandate to create something that doesn’t yet exist. I’ll be forced to pay for it dearly. My family will be forced to pay for it dearly. My neighbors will be forced to pay for it dearly. While Gates, Gore, Obama, et al, smoke the same cigars and drink the same liqour and their families take the same vacations and attend the same schools and universities.
It’s a worthy cause, certainly, but it should not be paid for on the backs of people like you and I. The only tangible I’m looking for is that these people walk in the boots of those they’re ######## all over and they accept the same sacrifices for themselves and their families.
Posted by: smartlillena | June 13, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am
“provides no effect on the GLOBAL WARMING NONSENSE while KILLING JOBS and LOWERING OUR STANDARD OF LIVING”
Yes we’re quite aware that right-wingers are perfectly willing destroy the environment in order to maintain their standard of living, and justify it by pandering to total scientific nonsense. It’s no wonder BP wasn’t concerned enough to avoid cutting corners on their ill-fated rig, they know all these beaches and marshes everybody is so concerned about will eventually be underwater anyways. I’m sure if the climate change deniers are dead wrong they won’t be volunteering to foot the bill for all the damage their policies inflict, including building levees around all the affected coastal cities and towns, and the entire state of Florida. They seek to dump these costs on others.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am
When did global warming become climate change?
I happen to believe in climate change but the hysterics and lies have turned it into a farce. The lies told by ‘so-called, experts’ are, IMO, criminal acts. At very least, they deserve to be dragged into civil court and sued for everything they own and will ever own. Those jokers cost a lot of people a lot of money. And made a handful of people a lot of money. Not to mention the tens of thousands of chicken-little syndromes those nuts triggered.
Posted by: smartlillena | June 13, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Watch out for that global warming warning in west Wyoming today.Make sure you put those climate change chains on your tires.
Posted by: Nephron | June 13, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
We heard this same song and dance back in the Carter administration. For 30 years the country has poured money down a rathole to subsidize pointy headed bureaucrats who can’t park their bicycles straight and bewildered grad students who are paid twice what they are worth and produce nothing of value. We have subsidized all sorts of junk which doesn’t work and has to be subsidized like tying a pork chop around the neck of your child so the dog will play with him. Government directed energy solutions don’t work and they cost money. If Gates wants to solve the energy problem let him use his own money. I wish the government would quit taking my mopney to use for this nonsense and to pay for mass transit and bike paths I will never use in urban areas.
Posted by: Bob Flanagan | June 13, 2010, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
“For 30 years the country has poured money…”
“poured”? You have got to be kidding. Absolutely nowhere near as much money has been “poured” into alternate energy R&D as has been spent on continuing our dependence on fossil fuels. The comparison is ridiculous. The reason you’ve been hearing about it since the Carter years is because nobody has done anything substantial about it since then.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Bill Gates is a sell out to the liberal agenda. Innovation does NOT come from government intervention but inspired inventors and entrepreneurs like Bill Gates USED to be! Where did he go wrong? Americans do well when government gets out of the way.
Posted by: bob | June 13, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Gates, you are awfully generous with investing OUR money! Let Americans decide what do with America’s money, not one liberal activist!
Posted by: EPU | June 13, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Bill Gates is a visionary/realist who has demonstrated his ability to get things done. He has more “practical” sense than anyone in the government!
Posted by: tillyerkt | June 13, 2010, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
“Americans do well when government gets out of the way”
How do you think BP’s management if it’s own affairs is working out for Americans living along the Gulf Coast bob?
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Too bad that no one will listen to Gates wise advice. Neocons won’t even admit that climate change is occurring. They heads are stuck in the sand.
Posted by: Gus | June 13, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
We should invest in alternative green energy, the rest of the world is moving fast forward, we’ll be begging for their technology and thereby become imitators rather than innovators.
Posted by: phallon | June 13, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
We should invest in alternative green energy, the rest of the world is moving fast forward, we’ll be begging for their technology and thereby become imitators rather than innovators.
Posted by: phallon | June 13, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
you have a capatilistic monster on the show that has all the wrong values on our society, telling us again what we should do: 1: INNOVATE: To date M$ has pushed or sued everyone with a better idea out of business, off-shored more Call Center and Programming jobs. He could care less what happens here.
2: TAX CRUDE: M$ spends or saves billions on CDS, DVDs and anything made out of plastic which in turn is made out of crude. What his company fight any initiative for a hike in pricing.
3: INVENT: M$ has no real interest in innovating its own products, in fear of hurting the bottom line. They sap this countries greastest resource so the dividend is a few more pennys on the dollar.
Bill Gates got 15 minutes of free advertising and said nothing, because he knows nothing significant is going to come out of this. BOA got a state court to release 997 houses to be sold on foreclosure in Utah rather modify the loans. BOA has had to pay $4.7 mill, so what, their Million dollar ads play on your same station. Big business is a gutless wonder with big pocket reserves and its in their best interest, as always, to keep the status quo.
3
Posted by: MrMikl | June 13, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
shepard147: lol you bought their line hook line and sinker. What happens when they bring in sea water and dispersant recovered oil to refineries? They claim they can reclaim 100% of it. I hope you get a tank full of this stuff.
Like always, BP and its allies rather would ship from the Gulf and Mideast because you miss the point, they already have the infrastructure in place and do not want to rebuild.
I lived in Minn where we had a plant. GMs first reaction (from a now bankrupt company?) is that alcohol in cars will damage the engines and you believe it.
If you are going to spew hate and ideas, please be educated on the subjects first. Exxon is still fighting to make fishermen whole, 25 years after the Valdez grounding. In the USA, its cheaper to fight in court.
Posted by: MrMikl | June 13, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
tillyerkt:
You forget the fact that our nation is a “Representative” government. Bill Gates doesn’t represent anybody except his own opinion. If he wants to get things done he should run for office. Otherwise Gates should invest in alternative energy on his own dime not America’s.
Posted by: EPU | June 13, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
If you people would get your heads out of the TV and actually think for yourselves you’d realize the official 911 story is a lie. Get out of the middle east and save trillions. Develope a new transportation system. Save money and lives. Creat jobs. Stop pollution.
Posted by: Frankinbun | June 13, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Why don’t I believe anything this guy says? At the turn of the last century they coined a phrase that is still appropriate for Mr. Gates and his cronies:
“Robber Barons”
He’s made all his money shutting down all competition, and using other people’s innovations to create a greedy monopoly that now is trying to make people think he is another Albert Schweizer. He reminds me of the Medieval Catholic Church who preached Love and redemption while it tortured and burned heretics at the stake, and would later create the third world as the fodder for its wealthy parasites to prey on (by the way, isn’t he doing the same thing now in India; like begets like, I guess).
When is America going to wise up and finally see that it’s real enemies and the enemies of all humanity are right here within its own borders?
Posted by: JAM | June 13, 2010, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Other countries are getting ahead of us with green energy – our government has long been too wrapped up with oil and coal companies. The government represents business interests instead of the individual voter so don’t expect them to worry about our air, soil and water – or our kids’ future – while they can line their pockets. They tell you the benefits of catering to corporations will trickle down, but it’s not prosperity that’s trickled down….
Posted by: Cassandra | June 13, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Try to say Gates, MSNBC and objectivity with a straight face.
Posted by: smartlillena | June 13, 2010, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
As far as the energy crisis is concerned:
We don’t have anything to replace oil or Natural gas and coal, except Nuclear Energy. Green energy has been around for the last forty years, and it is only a drop in the bucket.
Instead of using capitalist business practices to create “green” energy why not get the profiteers and parasites out of our energy industry, and make all energy companies non-profit companies and nationalize all our energy resources?
Energy is a National resource not a private one; stop the parasites and blackmailers from controlling our most vital resources. All the profits (from cutting out the profiteers) can be given back to our society and allow us to fund the search to make Nuclear energy and any other energies more reliable.
In this way we can create more American jobs and lower our expenditures. It will also make energy prices stable and stop taking the freedom to travel away from the American public.
Of course the rich won’t like it; they will finally have to pay for what they’ve stolen.
Too bad!
We have to start to get the monopolies off our backs!
Posted by: JAM | June 13, 2010, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
In 1978 Jimmy Carter, citing energey independce and a desire not to return to the Oil embargo crisis, set up the Synfuel Project to invewstigate and develop alternative energies. Some of the top minds in the field were lured to the project. As soon as Reagan came into office he killed the project, rather amazing for someone who had a ring side seat for the Santa Barbara oil spill from his ranch…..Republican domination over the next couple of decades prevented a return to this program. Had we continued with the research, we would probably be numver one in energey today – as producer not user!
Posted by: Chidem | June 13, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Cassandra | Jun 13, 2010 3:15:03 PM – Other countries are getting ahead of us with green energy – our government has long been too wrapped up with oil and coal companies.
We should do what the Japan and China have done. Let them “waste” their money developing the best “green solution” and then copy it!
Posted by: tillyerkt | June 13, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Similarly, in response to inane comments about “global warming warning in west Wyoming”, all it takes is a dictionary for someone as ignorant as you to learn the difference between climate and weather. Weather is local and temporary; climate is long-term and atmospheric. A cold winter or warmer-than-usual weekend says nothing about climate change; get your facts straight. By doing so, you’ll understand that climate change is a real and serious crisis. Until you have a better understanding, please defer from posting comments like this one.
Posted by: df12 | June 13, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
You forget the fact that our nation is a “Representative” government. EPU | Jun 13, 2010 1:49:23 PM -
It is supposed to be a “Constitutional Republic” governed in accordance with the Constitution. Someone should remind our current Administration.
Posted by: tillyerkt | June 13, 2010, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Until you have a better understanding,
Posted by: df12
—
There is no misunderstanding on my part. When did “global warming” become “climate change”? And why?
Posted by: smartlillena | June 13, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Bill needs to get out more, there are many fully developed alternatives but it is the US Government and their thirst for re-election OIL MONEY that keeps them in DO NOTHING MODE!
Posted by: CC | June 13, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
The US has 5% of the world’s population and consumes about 25% of the worlds oil. Its been like that for the last 50 years and shows no sign of changing. That’s why your government is authorizing companies to drill in deeper and deeper waters. Waters so deep that when something like this occurs it is very difficult to fix. So who is responsible for this disaster? ummm…
Bill Gates is right!
Posted by: jmacbean | June 13, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Gates is making a fool of himself. He’s a computer geek and, like our dull president, knows nothing about energy or energy policy. I would love to see how the United States goes about becoming oil independent from a global commodity supplied and traded by share holder owned corporations. How does that work exactly democrat party? LOL The entire notion is as stupid now as it was when our second worst president, Carter, thought he understood our economy and energy. ..and yes, by all means US citizens control the earth’s temperature based on how much we spend on energy!! LMAO
Posted by: shepard150 | June 13, 2010, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
jmac: Your “…US has 5% of the world’s population and consumes about 25% of the worlds oil…” Is is a common LIE told by INEPT COLLEGE PROFESSORS AND THE DEMOCRAT LEFT AND BELIEVED BY OUR MISGUIDED PRESIDENT. In 2006 the United States had 4.3% of the WORLDS POPULATION and with those people, PRODUCED 25% OF THE WOLDS GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT!! This compares to Russia at 2.1 % population and 2.2% GDP! In order to accomplish that, we use a lot of resources MORE EFFICIENTLY THEN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. I hope this generations survives it’s vast ignorance.
Posted by: shepard150 | June 13, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
@shapard150
Believe what you like. Its your coast line and its your country’s excessive use of oil that is responsible. This is going to happen again and again and again….
Posted by: jmacbean | June 13, 2010, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Facts are not “believes” sport. You “believe” that if Americans waste enough money on inefficient, uneconomical energy schemes, al gore will get richer and the earth’s temperature will change. NOW THOSE ARE “BELIEFS” in the vane of a the sun revolving around a flat earth. Learn the difference. There are hundreds of oil platforms and this incident is unique and had nothing to do with how much oil the WORLD uses. In fact, deep water drilling is only pursued after dimwitted democrats blocked drilling in safer areas. Obama and his party caused this spill and FAILED TO CLEAN IT UP. Ask Louisiana what they think of your hero and his “control”! Worst president ever.
Posted by: shepard150 | June 13, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Gates has recently partnered with Toshiba Corp. regarding new nuclear reactors that are small, don’t require refueling for it’s 40 year life cycle, and don’t require rod to control the reaction. One of his firms, terra corp is researching the possibility of 100 year reactors with similar capabilities. He is merely positioning himself financially for what we should be doing for economic and national security reasons. Environmentally safe energy would be an excellent byproduct.
Posted by: Sean B. in LV | June 13, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Both Republicans and Democrats have stopped all drilling and energy production. In 2007 Bush and Pelosi’s Congress stopped Chevron from drilling the largest natural gas field off Florida. Chevron had the drilling dright and the gas field would supply our country for 100 years. Now it is off the drilling areas even through it was out of coast view.
In other areas we have the ability to produce oil and natural gas from shale. Each time the government takes the area off drilling. This has happened multiple times under Obama.
Natural gas could be used in vehicles with little changes and would be environmentally friendly. Neither party cares. I think Obama cares even less with the destruction of the Gulf as he and his admin has done nothing to save it.
Posted by: Jeff G | June 13, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
jmacbean, oil corporations are being forced to drill in deeper waters because enviro-nazis lobby the government to ensure there is no drilling in shallow coastal waters, or in proven fields in the continental US and Alaska.
Posted by: Sean B. in LV | June 13, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Also Gates is just rhetoric. My sister-in-law was once up for a job at MICROSOFT and after going through multiple interviews MICROSOFT flooded the pool with H1B Visa people. She and the other Americans lost out on the jobs, but the foreigners didn’t. If Gates cared about the USA he would have been hiring skilled Americans, which she and others had the qualifications. Gates is a hypocrite and should stick to PC’s.
Posted by: Jeff G | June 13, 2010, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
I am all for drilling in safer areas. But these opportunities are getting less and less which is why all across the world oil companies are drilling in deeper waters. This inevitably increases the risk of something like this disaster happening. and it’s only going to get worse because our (the US being the worst culprit) consumption of oil is just getting greater and greater. Why? Because we are voting in politicians who do not have the balls to do anything about it…
Posted by: jmacbean | June 13, 2010, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
“There are hundreds of oil platforms and this incident is unique and had nothing to do with how much oil the WORLD uses”
No, there are thousands, but even so a failure rate of 1 in several thousand is nowhere near good enough when the consequences are this catastrophic. And no, the amount of oil the world uses has everything to do with whether it’s worth the risk to drill in difficult areas. There is nothing more funny that self proclaimed economically sensible right-wingers trying to totally ignore market forces, as if it’s inevitable that are forced to consume oil as fast as we can.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
@Sean B
I really don’t care about the politics of the situation but equating people who are concerned about the environment and the planet that we all inhabit, with the Nazis, is just ridiculous…
I am no fan of Al Gore but I do believe we are playing russian roulette with our planet (a risk we don’t need to take) and we need to change the way we do things.
Posted by: jmacbean | June 13, 2010, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
The kind of defeatism espoused by Shepherd is exactly the dribble that has been fed to us by the oil companies in the 37 years since the first “oil crisis”. Here we sit in the same or worst position 4 decades later
It’s really simple; take HALF of our massive military and aid investment we make in the Middle East to subsidize the price of oil and invest it in R&D and infrastructure.
We’re more than capable, we just need to get out from under the thumb of the oil lobby and do what’s in the best interest of the nation. The oil companies can truly become energy companies, or get out of the way and new businesses will form to take advantage of these opportunities.
Quit shilling for the oil companies and consider our national interests for a change. We need to convert to domestic produced renewable energy. This will improve our balance of trade, national defense, job creation, budget deficit, and environment.
We put a man on the moon in a decade, and Brazil eliminated foreign oil inputs in the same amount of time. It’s time for us to quit leaning on the Founding Fathers and the Great Generation and do our part to maintain and enhance America’s greatness. If you’re too weak to change, then you’re simply in the way.
Posted by: Tbone | June 13, 2010, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
There are other forms of sustainable fuel sources out there and governments around the world know this. They are 95 % cleaner and 95% cheaper to produce . But there is just not enough profit in it for them to make so the oil barons and the elite of society will keep this info suppressed at any cost because should this info get out they stand to lose everything including their grip of control over society and they will do anything within their power to prevent this including what ever it takes to silence any one who tries to bring this info out into the public eye. It’s all about the money and control
Posted by: whitewinged1 | June 13, 2010, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
“We put a man on the moon in a decade, and Brazil eliminated foreign oil inputs in the same amount of time.”
Brazils discovery of giant deep water oil fields just offshore has changed them from an importer to exporter of oil. Are you suggesting we should follow their example?
Posted by: Sigmonde | June 13, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
We need to change the way we do things. We need to drill in SHALLOW Gulf waters and in Alaska so that we can manage the platforms!!!!!!
Posted by: M. Smith | June 13, 2010, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
“Brazils discovery of giant deep water oil fields just offshore has changed them from an importer to exporter of oil. Are you suggesting we should follow their example?”
What changed Brazil from being an importer of oil was the massive change from imported oil to domestic bio fuel. Their deep sea oil discoveries came after they had already converted to ethanol based automotive fuel. Unless one desires continued servitude to imported oil, common sense suggests that we follow a course that allows us to use renewable domestic sourced fuel.
Posted by: Tbone | June 13, 2010, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
I would encourage Bill Gates to invest $16 billion in R&D.
Everyone who wants to quit drilling should give up going anywhere in a car, bus, train, airplane, ship, etc..
Posted by: grey0066 | June 13, 2010, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
There are the Zapata towers in Houston that is separated by nine feet. There could be a vertical wind generator installed in that space to capture the wind that blows though that area daily.
Parking lots should be shaded with solar cells.
Any wheel that needs brakes should have a motor/generator.
Even without the needed research for clean,and free energy, common sense gives us many ways to help remove the destructive energies we are currently locked into.
Posted by: crowbar | June 14, 2010, 12:03 am 12:03 am
“That’s why your government is authorizing companies to drill in deeper and deeper waters. Waters so deep that when something like this occurs it is very difficult to fix. So who is responsible for this disaster? ummm…
Bill Gates is right!” – jmacbean
Gates is wrong.
He just spewed spin to push his agenda on National TV.
To answer your question jmacbean, the Government is responsible for the fact that we are drilling in deep deep waters. It’s not that there isn’t oil in easy to get at places it’s just that they aren’t allowed to drill there. The government operates on some sort of stupidity principal where common sense is the enemy.
Posted by: Noz | June 14, 2010, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Amusing to read the same old eco drivel of pipe dreams and fairy dust. Yea, we went to the moon so we can replace the global oil economy with nonexistent discoveries? Eco nitwits wave away an entire global society built on the benefits of oil as though with enough MONEY, “someone else” will find some way to replace it….cause we went to the moon! While money can fund research, it cannot create discoveries on demand or change basic physics and chemistry. This is the kind of eco gibberish that lead democrats to waste billions of AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS on the huge E85 failure and the rusting abandoned plants AMERICAN VOTERS PAID FOR! Is that negative or just the kind of truth you can’t handle?
Posted by: shepard150 | June 14, 2010, 12:22 am 12:22 am
he is stating the obvious, more technologically appropriate advancement must be in place before drilling in such difficult areas are allowed, its that simple. the GOV is responsible to the people to make sure private companies are capable before a license is granted.
Posted by: rotorhead1871 | June 14, 2010, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Gates makes some good points but it is difficult to know if he is making those points for altruistic reasons or because he sees a way to personally benefit (either financially or by an improved public image) by his statements. Microsoft was not known as an innovator; a copier, a borrower, perhaps even taker of others ideas, but not an innovator. Except in one interesting area; the Microsoft business model was not based on competition in the sense of building a better product, but in establishing a larger user base (perhaps by unfair means) and then becoming the de facto standard so that consumers would have little choice but to by what Microsoft offered. Unfortunately, due to Microsoft’s behaviors and values (such as, IMO, “trust no one, take advantage of all”,”life is a competition and a zero sum game, so if anyone gets something from you, you have lost”), most of Mr. Gates’ comments have to be taken with a grain of salt and viewed with a distrustful eye. he is a smart man, but that does not mean he is necessarily a moral, ethical, or selfless man.
Posted by: dogdaysman | June 14, 2010, 12:39 am 12:39 am
It is unfortunate that it took such a large spill like that at Deepwater Horizon to generate interest in the push for more innovation and government investment in research & development. What most people aren’t aware of is that oil spills do occur every day and do decimate the natural environment. In Alaska, there is an average of at least one spill for every day of the calendar year. Elsewhere, we have seen spills near the Great Salt Lake and off of the coast of Australia in the Great Barrier Reef just in the past couple of months. The status quo is too feeble to support a rapidly growing nation and an increasingly fragile (but hugely important) global web of ecological connections.
Posted by: Eric | June 14, 2010, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Bill’s right. But the American people are far too greedy to do anything about it.
We won’t change until we’re absolutely forced to. Basically, until we’ve ruined our planet and our economy.
Posted by: JaylahPriest | June 14, 2010, 1:56 am 1:56 am
“What is a cynic? A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.” – Oscar Wilde.. How applicable that is to the current state of affairs.
Posted by: Ross | June 14, 2010, 2:05 am 2:05 am
The Oil Gusher in the Gulf was unfortunate?
I am voting against anyone who is a member of the party that screamed and shouted “HELL NO!” on Federal Government interfering with business, industries, or corporations.
If we had shouted “HELL YEAH!” instead, that Oil Gusher in the Gulf wouldn’t of happened in the first place!
Posted by: Angie | June 14, 2010, 2:19 am 2:19 am
“Unless one desires continued servitude to imported oil, common sense suggests that we follow a course that allows us to use renewable domestic sourced fuel.’
It helps that Brazil has an abundance of sugar cane (which the US lacks), which produces a higher quality fuel than corn. Ethanol from corn cannot be made as profitable as ethanol from sugar cane and is one of the reasons we do not see ethanol presently as a viable alternative to oil based product in the US. That said, oil is not going away soon. We need oil and we need to keep exploring for it while developing alternate energy sources and technology.
Posted by: Sigmonde | June 14, 2010, 8:06 am 8:06 am
“I am all for drilling in safer areas. But these opportunities are getting less and less which is why all across the world oil companies are drilling in deeper waters. This inevitably increases the risk of something like this disaster happening.” Oh… NO. There is plenty of oil in safer places… the companies are being forced to the deepwater locations by the regulations everyone seems to think we need more of. Go figure.
Posted by: FoolKiller | June 14, 2010, 9:15 am 9:15 am
“If we had shouted “HELL YEAH!” instead, that Oil Gusher in the Gulf wouldn’t of happened in the first place!” – Angie
W R O N G !
The government already had regulations and regulators in place.
They failed at their job.
Saying we need more regulations when we can’t administer to the ones we already have is fool hardy.
I know it’s hard to accept but we all need to realize that Government is more inept than the private sector by at least a factor of 3.67.
Posted by: Noz | June 14, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Funny, I thought Mr. Gates IS the status quo. His philanthropic goals ameliorate problems, but never prevent them. Same here with his very obvious suggestions to oil. Better he put his vast amount of money into supporting the alternative (and ignored) scientists and PR.
Posted by: pops | June 14, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Bill Gates is 100% correct in what he just said. He “hit the nail squarely” on the head! And the “problem” is that we have “known” this for 30 years or more. Big businesses have just “bought off” scientists and politicians who have lied and misinformed the public. And we haven’t been smart enough to “call them out” on their lies.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 14, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
In regard to Mr. Gate’s proposal for adding another $11 billion of government “investment” in alternative energy research: I think that would be great if the money would be spent on developing Zero-Point Energy, Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (aka cold fusion), Electrogravitics or some other truly advanced zero-polluting unlimited resource energy technologies–but we all know that’s not going to happen.
The multi-trillion dollar global energy industry is not about to relinquish its stranglehold, power and control over governments, industries, and the masses for such an antiquated and altruistic motive as doing what is right for civilization and the planet.
Governments, corporations and foundations allocate scarce R & D funding resources based on those projects that have the highest potential yield for return on investment. Consequently, truly revolutionary, non-polluting, and virtually unlimited resource advanced energy technologies like ZPE, LENR, Electrogravitics, etc. are not likely to ever be funded for the same reasons why JP Morgan shutdown Tesla’s projects when he discovered Tesla was more concerned with providing limitless free energy and advancing mankind than he was with how JP Morgan could “put a meter” on his discoveries.
This same mentality persists today. If huge profits can’t be made then it isn’t worth doing or, worse, we need to bury the technology—regardless if it is the right thing to do for society or the planet.
If government or industry was truly interested in finding new advanced energy technologies that could be sustained even moderately into the future then why has there been virtually no discussion or even mention of ZPE, for instance, by the government, the media, or our universities? And the answer isn’t because it would be a waste of research dollars when we have spent tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars over the last 40-50 years attempting to harness hot fusion in Tokamak reactors and we’re no closer to commercializing that technology than we were when we started—and that doesn’t even address the ridiculous millions and billions of dollars we’ve spent over the years on incredibly stupid and worthless projects, ostensibly, to keep some PhDs gainfully employed and/or not working on truly worthwhile projects –particularly if those projects might upset the status quo.
We’ve had the technologies to provide the planet with zero polluting, free, or nearly free, energy with virtually unlimited resources for decades, but as long as leaders put money, power, and control over improving life and the environment for all, you can rest assured we will continue our current spiral down into oblivion.
Posted by: CeeTee9 | June 14, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
I want to get my own private jet and energy saving family compound.. so that I can better understand eco and green philosophy. My poverty seems to be the best eco way to go.. can’t afford gas, a plane ticket or a big house — poor people save resources…
Posted by: Dontget818 | June 14, 2010, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Thanks, Mr. Gates, for stating the obvious. as long as this country is dependent on fossil fuels means the longer we will be dependent on foreign sources and the big oil companies who own our polititians. Fossil fuels foul our environment, no matter how “clean” the producers tell you it is. We should be racing toward fossil fuel energy independence and funding research to make alternative energy a reality. we’re Americans, we can do it!
Posted by: DaveM | June 15, 2010, 9:03 am 9:03 am
To all of those shouting “Drill, baby, drill”, what kind of world do you want to leave your children and grandchildren? A nasty, dirty one that’s barely habitable, where they curse us for not doing what we could when we could? Or a world not too different from today. You can’t have it both ways. “Drill, baby, drill” equals a country owned by the energy giants who can charge use whatever they want and still foul our environment and get away with it.
Posted by: DaveM | June 15, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am
There isn’t a technological fix for the fuel problem. Live more simply, that’s the fix. Massive energy consumption leads to massive waste and to extinction. It is the same for every living thing on earth. What makes us think we are special?
Posted by: Fossil Fool | June 16, 2010, 12:31 am 12:31 am
I strongly agree we need much more clean energy, but saying this spill proves that it’s so is like someone leaving the corral gate open, the horses escaping, and someone concluding that proves we should learn to ride cattle.
What it proves is we need the kind of regulation that’s commonplace almost anywhere else on earth where oil rigs are around developed nations. In 1999 regulators demanded such safety here. In 2003, BP cried to Bush who began chanting, “Industry will regulate itself!” and removed the regulations. That story was published by ABC last month.
Posted by: The_Mick | July 9, 2010, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Sure, it can be great, on the other hand two vital issues had been skipped.
Posted by: Tessie Hovden | September 23, 2011, 8:25 am 8:25 am