Obama Calls for Vote on Medicare ‘Doc Fix’
ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports
President Obama called on Congress during his weekly address to allow a vote on the so called “doc fix legislation” that would prevent a pay cut for Medicare doctors.
“This year, a majority of Congress is willing to prevent a pay cut of 21 percent – a pay cut that would undoubtedly force some doctors to stop seeing Medicare patients altogether,” Obama said in the address, noting that since 2003 Congress has acted to prevent the pay cuts from going into effect.
“But this time,” he added, “some Senate Republicans may even block a vote on this issue. After years of voting to defer these cuts, the other party is now willing to walk away from the needs of our doctors and our seniors.”
President Obama warned that if Congress doesn’t act, doctors will see the 21 percent cut in their Medicare payments this coming week.
“This week, doctors will start receiving these lower reimbursements from the Medicare program,” he said. “That could lead them to stop participating in the Medicare program, and that could lead seniors to lose their doctors. We cannot allow this to happen.”
Noting that he realized that there needs to be a long-term solution to the problem, the president said that he is “committed to permanently reforming” the Medicare system.
“I’m absolutely willing to take the difficult steps necessary to lower the cost of Medicare and put our budget on a more fiscally sustainable path,” he said. “But I’m not willing to do that by punishing hard-working physicians or the millions of Americans who count on Medicare. That’s just wrong.”
The president urged Republicans to allow a vote to stop the pay cut.
“I urge them to stand with America’s seniors and America’s doctors,” Obama said.
Senate Republicans say there will be a vote when the Senate comes back in session.
The Senate’s top Republican, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said his party wants to avoid reducing physicians’ fees, but do it without adding to the deficit — meaning spending cuts elsewhere.
“Right now, among other challenges, we have a debt crisis, a jobs crisis, a housing crisis, a financial crisis, and an oil spill that the American people clearly don’t believe government is effectively responding to,” MConnell said. “So you can understand the American people’s skepticism when they’re told that simply adding more government is the solution to government’s previous failures.”
-Sunlen Miller
Email
Biden Reflects on Grief, Suicidal Thoughts
Is Congress Sounding Dumber?
Gee, one would think that would have been in the massive health care bill. OHHH, that’s right…Obama HID this cost and now he needs to shove it through!!!
WE WILL REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER. LIAR IN CHEIF IS OUT IN 2012.
Posted by: mjishernameo | June 12, 2010, 6:35 am 6:35 am
How about a “fix” of the whole poisonous Rube Goldberg political spirit of ipecac Health-care Reform Law? Hope and Change equals Fiction and Fraud.
Posted by: pauldia | June 12, 2010, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Mr. Smartest Clueless Prez. bo – you can use your “smartestness” one more time: resign.
It would be your Smartest decision for your country, and you will be remembered for generations for your Greatestness to realize your limitations in this job.
Posted by: Huh | June 12, 2010, 8:28 am 8:28 am
OK, We tried this prez…he sounded good, he looked good, we thought he might heal some American wounds…but instead we got this completely incompetent, petulant, America hating, souless, thin skinned, dumb,lying man-child…Can we please have a new one? Right away?
Posted by: mjishernameo | June 12, 2010, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Ha! Everything Obama says about this problem is going to be caused 100-fold by his health care system. Gee… cut doctor pay, remove competition, force them to see patients they don’t want to see, and you’ll lose services, doctors, and good care. What do you think is going to happen when his entire crackpot socialized medicine system kicks in around 2014???
I’ll tell you want’s going to happen. The Gov’t will wake up to the reality that you cannot “force” people to provide services for a price less than they are willing to work for. They will find themselves with a mess on their hands as doctors quit, or insurers scream that they cannot pay the bills, or the Federal Gov’t plan will have to skyrocket its rates and costs to keep the system actually functioning. Most likely a combination of all three.
Posted by: mrman | June 12, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Hey Sunlen — how about some context? How about Obama’s underhanded move to take the Doc Fix out of Obamacare so he could pretend it wouldn’t cost so much? How about THAT? Good God, you call yourself a reporter?
Posted by: Liz | June 12, 2010, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Why doesn’t the President insist that the 2011 budget be presented ASAP?
Posted by: tillyerkt | June 12, 2010, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Captain Kicka$$: “So I’ll know who’s a$$ to kick.”
Posted by: MM | June 12, 2010, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Once again, “YOU LIE !!!” rings true. Words more true were never spoken.
This refrain will become the only appropriate response to his every comment in the 2012 elections and has already become his only lasting legacy.
Obama made this mess of our heath care system and should pay the full political price of his unending duplicity, whether that results in cutting other areas of the budget to offset this additional cost or actually making the cuts to doctors he and his Social Democrat Party demanded be included in Obamacare.
Like all honest Americans, I look forward to spitting on his political grave after November.
Posted by: RUKidding0 | June 12, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Where are the lefties exclaiming how many people have died without health care insurance since the health care bill was passed? They still don’t have insurance, right? Of no concern to those screaming idiots any more? What has changed?
Posted by: MM | June 12, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am
It would have been better just to get it right the first time around. Don’t do it if you can’t get it right the first time. Old adage biting you in the butt again.
Posted by: jackie | June 12, 2010, 11:05 am 11:05 am
“said his party wants to avoid reducing physicians’ fees, but do it without adding to the deficit — meaning spending cuts elsewhere.”
Where exactly? As the ridicule heaped on Obama for his across the board freeze of discretionary spending and 5% cut pointed out – there is no where else to save that kind of money. Cut defense, social security, or medicare and/or raise taxes. Those are the options. All of them. Nothing else is big enough to actually matter.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 12, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Nothing else is big enough to actually matter.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 12, 2010 11:12:34 AM
How about increased tax revenue from putting America back to work?
Posted by: MM | June 12, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
LEAK: Health-care rules may force coverage change…
ANALYSIS: Keep Your Health Plan? Probably Not…
more snakeoil from the snakeoil salesman in chief
Posted by: This IS Obamas Katrina | June 12, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am
He just passed a giant healthcare bill a couple months ago and he’s already back for billions more. This guy is as annoying as the bums begging for change down on the street corner.
Posted by: peterg | June 12, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Everyone who voted for this fraud should have to put a scarlet letter “O” on their forehead forever so we all know who screwed us over and ultimately should pay for this rediculous mess of a presidency. You gullible idiots dreaming about free stuff at the expense of everyone else should pay, and your children should pay and your grandchildren should pay to get us out of this mess so no one in your idiot gullible family ever forgets the day in history when you voted an inexperienced corrupt chicago politician into the Whitehouse and screwed this whole country over.
Posted by: SS | June 12, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
How about increased tax revenue from putting America back to work?
MM | Jun 12, 2010 11:29:39 AM
Heh, I guess I asked for that. Perhaps I should have said “What OTHER THAN AN ENTIRELY MEANINGLESS BUMPERSTICKER SLOGAN should they do?”
Posted by: jhw539 | June 12, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
He just passed a giant healthcare bill a couple months ago and he’s already back for billions more.
peterg | Jun 12, 2010 12:32:09 PM
The healthcare insurance bill added taxes that made it basically revenue neutral. Indeed, one of the big attacks on it is that it is phased in slowly to allow for startup costs to be paid for as we go.
Maybe you’re thinking of the Republican prescription benefit, which cost hundreds of billions but didn’t raise a cent of revenue – it was all put on the debt.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 12, 2010, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Interesting analysis of the health care reform legislation per Rand, See Bloomberg, “Health Care Reform Bill Best Option: Analysis, The chosen plan will insure more Americans with least cost to government, think tank says”
Also see the June issue of Health Affairs, called “moving forward on health reform.”
Posted by: progresssive mama | June 12, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
The healthcare insurance bill added taxes that made it basically revenue neutral. Indeed, one of the big attacks on it is that it is phased in slowly to allow for startup costs to be paid for as we go.
Posted by: progresssive mama
Revenue neutral for who? It’s revenue negative for the portion of us that actually pay taxes. Like I said earlier, he’s already back for billions more.
Posted by: peterg | June 12, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Well…let me warn everyone right now what the Republicans hope to gain, if they choose to “block” this vote. Their main goal right now is to make sure the “misery index” stays very high on everday people like you and me. By doing that you will do what? You will get so “angry and emotional” you will; “backlash vote” them back into power because “you are ‘angry’ at the government” as it exists now. The Republicans are absolutely “bankrupt of leadership or positive ideas”, folks. If they do this – take it out on them this fall. As voters we need to wake up as to what is really going on…especially with health care. They are absolute masters at destroying the socioeconomic status of the middle class and then getting you/us to believe it is the “fault” of the opposition. WAKE UP!
Posted by: CND FOX | June 12, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
peterg | Jun 12, 2010 1:40:15 PM
If you look at the little boxes the comments are in, the screen name associated with the comment is below the comment, not above. But I do recommend the Bloomberg article I mentioned as well as the issue of Health Affairs, and I’m sure jhw will get back to you. (He’s more articulate and detail-oriented than moi) It does appear you need additional information as you’re just repeating sound bites… do you read the CBO blog or health economics related journals?
Posted by: progressive mama | June 12, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
As voters we need to wake up as to what is really going on…especially with health care. They are absolute masters at destroying the socioeconomic status of the middle class and then getting you/us to believe it is the “fault” of the opposition. WAKE UP!
Posted by: CND FOX | Jun 12, 2010 1:42:48 PM
Ain’t that the truth. Its said that it works so well.
Posted by: progressive mama | June 12, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
This HC deal reminds me of the prom..My daughter got me to agree to cover the “incidentals” if she paid for the dress ..which I thought was a great deal…until I realized I was on the hook for hair, nails, tanning, jewelry, a purse, part of the limo costs, professional pictures, make-up, high heels, the after-party, and on and on… yup fellow travelers, open up your check book ..we are on the hook for sooo much more than we bargained for with this bill and all the little “incidentals” like the medicare fix.
Posted by: cindy | June 12, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
all the little “incidentals” like the medicare fix.
Posted by: cindy | Jun 12, 2010 2:55:03 PM
You were always on the hook for doc fix and have been for many years. What other “all the little incidentals” are you referring to?
Posted by: Task | June 12, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
From Obamacare comes those false assumptions used to expand the scope of government AND claim a deficit reduction at the same time. Among the assumptions that the CBO director said even he doubted were: “The legislation assumes nearly $500 billion in 10-year savings from curbing waste, fraud and abuse and changing the way that health care providers such as doctors and hospitals are paid. It also assumes that the plan to cut physician payments by 21 percent this year remains in effect, although Congress has a long history of canceling scheduled pay cuts to doctors.” So used the 21% cut to justify the “savings” in his mandatory insurance program and now he wants congress to extend the “hold” on the reduction passed by the Republicans. Worse, he claims the Republicans want to stop the action to halt the reduction. Either you plan to cut Medicare doctor payments and reduce the deficit in your health care “reform” or you don’t. Now that’s what I call a hypocrite.
Posted by: wantingbalance | June 12, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Obama lied using the savings for Obamacare. Now he doesn’t need to pass Obamacare but seniors are being turned down as patients because it costs the MD more to treat them than not, so now he wants a few lttle hundreds of millions more. Obama is an incompetent politician totally devoid of morality.
Posted by: 2factoid | June 12, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Posted by: wantingbalance | Jun 12, 2010 3:12:36 PM
Your quote is not from the CBO director at all but are the opinions of a newspaper reporter for Mclatchy newspapers.
It’s important to get your facts straight if you are to be believed, never mind then hurling accusations of ‘hypocrisy’ at the same time.
Posted by: Dave | June 12, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Task, of course we were on the hook for the fix..so why wasn’t it right up there..up front..you know, all transparent like we are always being promised? As far as the other incidentals, my personal favorite is the mandatory room for nursing mothers to express milk, that ALL companies with over 50 employees must put aside..and it can’t be used for anything else, can’t be a closet, can’t be part of the bathroom…like I said, open up your wallet! (and yes, I nursed 4 kids.)
Posted by: cindy | June 12, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
“if you add people to healthcare that don’t pay a dime for it, it will increase the cost and everything else associated with it”
What critics seem to overlook is the plan forces healthy people to carry insurance to make up costs, and right now people with no insurance get treatment at emergency rooms at a much higher cost to everybody than if they were able to get regular care. The old illness for profit system we used to have only benefited the insurance industry by letting them get away with covering healthy people who chose to have coverage and dump and deny those who needed care.
Posted by: Skip | June 12, 2010, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Posted by: cindy | Jun 12, 2010 6:56:28 PM
The “Doctor fix” has been put in place by every Congress for well over a decade.
The large majority of those Congresses were Republican majorities. This is no ‘secret’ or ‘hidden’ element.
Posted by: Dan | June 12, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I have had a lot of medical problems of late and have been seen by a lot of doctors. EVERYONE OF THEM PREDIDICT “MAJOR SHORTAGES” OF DOCTORS WHEN THE NEW GOV HEALTH BILL GOES INTO EFFECT. GUESS WHAT THAT MEANS?? RATIONING – PALIN WAS RIGHT ON!!!!
Posted by: Manitu | June 12, 2010, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
I have had a lot of medical problems of late and have been seen by a lot of doctors. EVERYONE OF THEM PREDIDICT “MAJOR SHORTAGES” OF DOCTORS WHEN THE NEW GOV HEALTH BILL GOES INTO EFFECT.
Posted by: Manitu | Jun 12, 2010 7:59:40 PM
One of the reasons the bill is being phased in over a period of years. This bill will create jobs for doctors and focus attention on more medical graduates. That’s what happens when you increase the level of health care for a country.
Posted by: Dan | June 12, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Well Manitu, everybody is entitled to their opinion, but frankly I’m little inclined to believe Palin is right just because so-and-so says their doctors say this or that. The fact is before this bill was passed insurance companies were already rationing care.
Posted by: Skip | June 12, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Dan, remember the big deal Obama made about putting the cost of the wars..upfront..and in the budget? Why then this slight of hand on health care? We knew this needed to be in the bill..so did he. Why the double standard? I cut my political teeth during the Bush years when my father started lecturing me on the spending that was going on..I was horrified..and became a vocal citizen-for all the good that did- this dishonesty from Washington cannot fly without a politically polarized populace..we are it, and they are taking advantage of us..again. We are arguing in our back yards while the feds are hotwiring our cars and driving them away.
Posted by: cindy | June 12, 2010, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Why then this slight of hand on health care?
Posted by: cindy | Jun 12, 2010 8:27:13 PM
There was no ‘slight of hand’ whatsoever.
This ‘Doctor fix’ has had to be considered and passed by every congress since the changes to the medicare bill in 1997. The majority of those congresses were Republican.
It could have been voted down each time, it was passed.
Posted by: Chuckie | June 12, 2010, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
“We are arguing in our back yards while the feds are hotwiring our cars and driving them away”
How about dumping long paying customers on the flimsiest of pretenses when they finally get ill and start filing claims, like the insurance companies were doing regularly? Now that is real theft.
Posted by: Skip | June 12, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Well, well, well. What have we here? Oh, I remember. The Doc Fix. I remember when the Doc Fix was part of the health care plan but it put the total cost over the magical and very unattractive $1 Trillion mark. So it was carved out and tabled for later. Now it’s time to pay the piper. Again.
Posted by: Woody | June 12, 2010, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Dave, perhaps you may want to check your facts.
You state that “The “Doctor Fix” has been put in place by every Congress for well over a decade. The large majority of those Congresses were Republican majorities. This is no ‘secret’ or ‘hidden’ element.”
The problem is that when Obama, Pelosi and Reid “cooked” the books on Obamacare deficit savings they assumed that the reductions would take place as the enacted law required. The CBO counted the reduction in payments to doctors as part of the “deficit reduction” credited to Obamacare for the first ten years.
So, if the Democrats knew the “Doctor Fix” would have to be put in place (as you suggest), why did they count it as “savings” in calculating the deficit reduction for the first ten years of Obamacare?
The answer is, if the hadn’t counted it as “savings”, Obamacare would not be able to claim any deficit reduction over the first ten years.
There is a letter from the CBO director, Douglas Elmendorf, to Representative Paul Ryan (dated March 19, 2010), stating that if the “doctors’ fix” was implemented the deficit would increase by $59B during the period 2010 – 2019. This is instead of the $124B reduction claimed by Obama, Pelosi and Reid.
They knew they were “cooking” the books on this deal. Without it they had no deficit reduction in the first ten years.
The fact is the President is a proven liar. In his plea for the Congress to pass the “Doctor Fix”, you will notice he forgot to mention there would be no deficit reduction from Obamacare in the first ten years. In addition to being a liar, he is also an absolute coward.
Posted by: SomeLogic | June 12, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Medicare generally denies a higher percentage of claims compared to private health insurers.
Percentage of Claims Denied (2009):
Aetna: 1.81%
Anthem: 4.34%
CIGNA: 2.56%
Coventry: 3.99%
Humana: 2.03%
United Healthcare: 2.02%
Medicare: 4%
Source: American Medical Association
Posted by: Mary | June 12, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
THE CANADIAN HEALTH SYSTEM IS IN BIG TROUBLE AND THEY HAVE ONR TENTH THE POPULATION OF US. OBAMA’S HEATH BILL WILL FALL OF IT OWN WEIGHT EVEN BEFORE IT IS FULLY IMPLEMENTED!!
Posted by: Manitu | June 12, 2010, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Thank you Mary for your stats. The goal of the progressives (formerly Democrats) is a single payer system. The rationing that will cause will “dwarf” the rationing of current health ins companies. Single payer systems deni second opinions and other options. That’s why our current system is so much superior to that of Canada and other single payer systems. How many Americans do you see going to Canada for procedures. Nadda, nil.
Posted by: Manitu | June 12, 2010, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I am a senior and I have an excellent private supplementary plan. It is expensive, but I never see a bill. No deductibles, no co-pay. Everythng is covered. This will be done away with when Obama care is fully activated. Talk about progress!!
Posted by: Manitu | June 12, 2010, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Medicare generally denies a higher percentage of claims compared to private health insurers.
Mary | Jun 12, 2010 10:21:05 PM
Interestingly, Medicare does not require pre-approval while private insurance does, and a refusal to approve a procedure is not defined as denying a claim. People can only lie with statistics by assuming you’re too stupid to require they define their terms fully.
But if Republicans went full bore to eliminate Medicare (rather than leaping to defend it tooth and nail as they actually did last year) then I might consider that maybe they had some sort of actual principled position against government insurance. And a desire to see the poor die of easily treated conditions like in much of the third world (or are you in favor of expensive free loading off of emergency rooms?).
Posted by: jhw539 | June 12, 2010, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
This will be done away with when Obama care is fully activated. Talk about progress!!
Manitu | Jun 12, 2010 10:50:36 PM
Great, a satisfied customer of fully nationalized ‘socialist’ insurance (Medicare) complaining about everyone else getting the barest skeleton of what he now enjoys.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 12, 2010, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Working for the government has two naturally economic negatives. In business, if you screw up you get fired or demoted. Working for the gov it is rare that that ever happens, which causes inefficiency! And…. only the private sector can create economic wealth. When you overload the cart with public employees and the private sector is trying to pull it… what happens…the cart slows down or stops completely. Pretty basis 101 economic stuff. And…. the bigger the govermednt grows, the smaller the citizen becomes.
Posted by: temagami | June 12, 2010, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Discussion on this topic is pretty much academic. Current adm finnancial policies will cause a complete meltdown down the road, resulting in entitlement programs paying cents on the dollar – if that.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | June 12, 2010, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Medicare does NOT require pre approval? NEWS TO ME!!
Posted by: Tom Barnow | June 12, 2010, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
I agree with this entirely:
“But if Republicans went full bore to eliminate Medicare (rather than leaping to defend it tooth and nail as they actually did last year) then I might consider that maybe they had some sort of actual principled position against government insurance. And a desire to see the poor die of easily treated conditions like in much of the third world (or are you in favor of expensive free loading off of emergency rooms?). ”
BTW…The idea that there is going to be mass refusal to take Medicare patients just as the Boomers start to enter the program is misguided. Doc’s who claim this is going to happen are using a move from the Fox News playbook. Where are else are they going to get? Fine…go get your real estate licence, but I don’t think you’ll like the numbers there either. For most doc’s there isn’t a choice. Maybe if you’re a Pediatrician or Plastic Surgeon, but otherwise, it’s Medicare or bust. I particularly love the arguement that Medicare payments don’t cover overhead. HMMM…were you aware that there are two sides to the profit equation? Maybe that swanky suite in a brand new office complex wasn’t such a great idea…and it certainly wasn’t Medicare’s idea.
Posted by: mike b | June 12, 2010, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
I cannot see anyone spending eight- twelve years in medical stuidies, coming out with 100k or more in debts, to work in gov run health program – WOULD YOU???
Posted by: Jimbo | June 13, 2010, 12:06 am 12:06 am
jhw539: “Republicans were the ones defending Medicare from even a single dollar in cuts during the health insurance reform battle. I guess the Republican caucus are just a bunch of liberal minded progressives in your world?”
For the most part, yes. Did you not catch the level of deficit spending during the Bush years? In terms of spending, with few exceptions, the parties are indistinguishable. Except that liberal Democrats like to spend even more. Obama has spent more in 18 months than Bush did in eight years. The 2010 federal budget is 50% DEBT and it’s currently estimated we’ll have a $19.6 TRILLION national debt by 2015 (which I’m sure is low).
Doesn’t matter. Our economy won’t make it to 2015 given the current rate of spending. It’s going to get ugly well before then. European countries are now taking their lumps, and so will we. It’s unavoidable.
Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2010, 12:09 am 12:09 am
“The idea that there is going to be mass refusal to take Medicare patients just as the Boomers start to enter the program is misguided. Doc’s who claim this is going to happen are using a move from the Fox News playbook. Where are else are they going to get?”
The Fox News playbook? Try common sense.
A few months ago, I asked my doctor about the impact of Medicare and Medicaid on her practice. She told me that she has to limit Medicaid patients to no more than 10% of her patients or her office can’t meet payroll. Her own salary went down 10% over the past two years due to increased costs of running her practice. She also told me that she spent considerable time with a Medicaid patient who visited her on three occasions. Her reimbursement was $1, and it took six weeks to receive it. That’s probably an outlier, but that’s insane.
Doctors can move on to all sorts of things. They can go to Clinical Research Organizations and pharmaceuticals, they can consult in many industries, they can do research, all kinds of things. Many specialists are already millionaires and they can just retire.
I guarantee you, no aspiring family doctor is going to spend $200,000+ on medical school to face making $40,000 a year when they graduate. Why bother?
Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2010, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Dear Mr. President:
Is there anything for which you do not blame someone else?
If you didn’t want the job you shouldn’t have run.
Posted by: Miri | June 13, 2010, 12:24 am 12:24 am
“Her own salary went down 10% over the past two years due to increased costs of running her practice”
Most of us have taken a hit the last 2 years…why should doctors be necessarily exempt?
“I guarantee you, no aspiring family doctor is going to spend $200,000+ on medical school to face making $40,000 a year when they graduate. Why bother?”
I don’t know, I guess I was under the misunderstanding that many people become doctors because they like helping people.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Some mind-boggling facts. In terms of current unfunded obligations:
Medicare: $75.6 TRILLION
Medicare Part D: $19 TRILLION
Medicare Part D’s obligations exceed Social Security’s by about $4.6 TRILLION (!). We’re talking about the prescription drug program that went into effect in 2006!
Net federal tax revenues collected annually: About $2 TRILLION.
Do the math.
Another interesting tidbit. Estimated Medicare fraud ranges from $50 BILLION to $100 BILLION annually. If Medicare were a private insurer, it would have gone bankrupt many years ago.
And yet progressives view Medicare as THE model of an efficient single-payer system.
Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2010, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Medicare: $75.6 TRILLION
Medicare Part D: $19 TRILLION
You’re talking about the unfunded liabilities at a benchmark of something like 75 years. There is plenty of wealth in this country to eventually pay down our debts.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 12:44 am 12:44 am
“I don’t know, I guess I was under the misunderstanding that many people become doctors because they like helping people.”
Yes, doctors obviously like to help people. But this isn’t Cuba where doctors and plumbers each make $15 a month and live in abject poverty. In America, we expect to be compensated for going through the enormous expense and effort of becoming a doctor. It’s a high-value and sometimes very high-risk occupation that only a small fraction of our population can perform. Is there any question that we have the best doctors in the world here? If you remove incentives to allow doctors to earn what they’re worth, you’ll get a lot fewer doctors entering the field.
Aspiring doctors are smart people. And there are plenty of ways smart people can help others without going to school for many years and incurring $200,000 to $500,000 in debt that they’ll struggle to pay off with a low salary.
Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2010, 1:02 am 1:02 am
“If you remove incentives to allow doctors to earn what they’re worth”
Worth is always negotiable. Doctors might have to lower their standard of living just like the rest of us because as a society we consume more than we produce, running ourselves into debt, and we just got done shipping a big chunk of our manufacturing overseas. Other countries aren’t going to pay us just to be Americans, we have to produce something, and not consume so much.
“Aspiring doctors are smart people. And there are plenty of ways smart people can help others”
Which kind of doctor would you rather have?: A doctor that practices because it pays really really well, or a doctor willing to work for less that genuinely wanted to be a doctor regardless.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 1:24 am 1:24 am
“You’re talking about the unfunded liabilities at a benchmark of something like 75 years. There is plenty of wealth in this country to eventually pay down our debts.”
Based on what analysis?
The current debt per taxpayer is over $118,000. The unfunded liability per citizen is over $352,000. They’re both rising.
Our current debt is $13 TRILLION. It’s expected to be $19.6 TRILLION by 2015. Our current federal budget is 50% debt and rising. Our debt is expected to exceed our GDP before 2012. Our deficit-to-GDP ratio is 11% and rising (the European Union only allows a max of 3% for their member countries before austerity measures kick in).
It gets better. The Congressional Budget Office projects that annual interest payments on the federal debt, currently less than $200 BILLION, will rise to nearly $1 TRILLION by 2020 (that’s 50% of our current tax receipts and 25% of our current budget). Some economists warn that CBO’s numbers are too optimistic and that the problem could end up being much worse.
There’s no way to get out of this mess without huge tax increases and/or severe cuts in federal spending. As for the 47% who don’t currently pay federal tax? They’ll soon be paying the piper as well, either directly or indirectly.
Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2010, 1:30 am 1:30 am
“There’s no way to get out of this mess without huge tax increases and/or severe cuts in federal spending”
Amen to that.
-But the only places you’re going to be able to get severe cuts in federal spending are the military and the entitlements–Republicans will never cut those and they’ll demonize the Democrats if they try–and huge tax increases–Republicans will never enact those and they’ll demonize the Democrats if they try to—-so while conservatives apparently cry about the debt all the time they show absolutely no sign of really wanting to actually do anything about it.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2010, 1:40 am 1:40 am
so while conservatives apparently cry about the debt all the time they show absolutely no sign of really wanting to actually do anything about it.
Posted by: Skip | Jun 13, 2010 1:40:54 AM
———–
Amen to that.
Posted by: progressive mama | June 13, 2010, 1:47 am 1:47 am
“Doctors might have to lower their standard of living just like the rest of us because as a society we consume more than we produce…”
They might. Or they might not enter the field because it’s not worth the expense and effort. This is happening in other fields already. Because of the outsourcing of IT labor the past few years, we’ve experienced a huge drop in Computer Science graduates because many fear being outsourced. So what happened to them? They simply went into other fields that provided what they felt was more security and compensation. The unexpected drop in new graduates is causing a shortage in the low-end of that labor market. Ironically, companies who want U.S. talent and can’t find it are being forced to go outside the U.S. That could happen with doctors as well.
“Which kind of doctor would you rather have?”
The most qualified I could afford, particularly if it were a cancer specialist trying to keep me alive.
Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2010, 1:55 am 1:55 am
“I don’t know, I guess I was under the misunderstanding that many people become doctors because they like helping people.”
—
Amen to that, too.
Mayo Clinic pays medical doctors a fixed salary. From what I hear, they’re quality of care is excellent, and they tend to attract good doctors. Indeed, they are consistently ranked as one of Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For.
And it seems to me that there are always plenty of folks trying to work for the government, vying for seats in the House and Senate, hoping to be chosen for cabinet positions, on waiting lists to be a cop or fire fighter. Go figure.
Posted by: progressive mama | June 13, 2010, 2:02 am 2:02 am
“Mayo Clinic pays medical doctors a fixed salary. From what I hear, they’re quality of care is excellent, and they tend to attract good doctors. Indeed, they are consistently ranked as one of Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For.”
From the WSJ (January 8, 2010):
“Mayo said last week it will no longer accept Medicare patients at one of its primary care clinics in Arizona. Mayo said the decision is part of a two-year pilot program to determine if it should also drop Medicare patients at other facilities in Arizona, Florida and Minnesota, which serve more than 500,000 seniors.
Mayo says it lost $840 million last year treating Medicare patients, the result of the program’s low reimbursement rates. Its hospital and four clinics in Arizona—including the Glendale facility—lost $120 million. Providers like Mayo swallow some of these Medicare losses, while also shifting the cost by charging more to private patients and insurers.
Of course, only governments can lose that much money and pretend they don’t have to change. “Mayo Clinic loses a substantial amount of money every year due to the reimbursement schedule under Medicare,” the institution said. “Decades of underfunding and paying for volume rather than value in Medicare have led us to this decision.”
Mayo is probably a leading indicator of where other hospitals and doctors are headed. Physicians on average earn 20% to 30% less from Medicare than they do from private patients, and many are dropping out of the program. While about 92% of family physicians participate in Medicare, only about 73% of those are now accepting new patients. In some specialties—neurology, oncology, gynecology—in places like Manhattan and Washington, patients can struggle to find any doctor who’ll accept Medicare.
Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2010, 2:11 am 2:11 am
the health policy blog at Mayo Clinic (prior to WSJ’s article, but worth mentioning…)
“Some recent media reports have inaccurately stated that Mayo Clinic in Arizona is no longer seeing any Medicare patients. This is not true.
Rather, a five-physician Mayo Clinic Arizona family practice clinic in Glendale, Ariz., has opted out of Medicare as part of a Mayo Clinic time-limited trial that will be reviewed at its conclusion…. Current Medicare patients may continue receiving primary care at the Glendale clinic but will be required to pay out-of-pocket for office visits….
…In many ways, Medicare patients are Mayo Clinic’s ideal patients – they match the strengths of Mayo’s practice. Medicare patients are typically dealing with multiple complex health problems, which many people face as they age.
Nevertheless, decades of underfunding and paying for volume rather than value in Medicare have led us to this decision. Providers who do fewer unnecessary tests and services are paid the least, and they are the doctors and hospitals which will go out of business first if we don’t change the payment system.
That is why Mayo Clinic strongly supports health insurance reform and health care delivery reform. Health care delivery reform in the patients’ best interests means changing the payment system to reward value — defined as better outcomes, better safety, better service and lower cost. Better value results in fewer tests and decreased overall costs.”
In regards to the last paragraph, ARRA delivered health insurance reform, and trial programs to work toward health delivery reform. I mentioned a RAND analysis and June’s issue of health affairs journal in a prior post. In Health Affairs, there is an article about how unsavy we are, in general, in regards to evidence-based medicine (see the right wing freak out over the release of information pertaining to breast cancer and mammograms) and we’ve all seen how unwilling any politicians are to touch Medicare.
Sacrifices will have to be made. The status quo is unsustainable and ARRA is only a first meager step toward what needs to be done. And Republicans didn’t even want to take that step.
Posted by: progressive mama | June 13, 2010, 2:38 am 2:38 am
I would take RAND analyses with a grain of salt.RAND(or BLAND as per Kubrick) is great for Kennedyesque think tank policy projections that have led to horrible consequences.They blew the biggest political developement of the 20th Century, the collapse of Soviet Communism.And yes, most doctors are altruistic and go into the profession to help people.But it is hard to be sympatheic to reimbursement cuts when the doctor comes out of training at age 30 having been paid minimum wages for 4 or 5 years with 2 kids,a wife and a 500,000 dollar debt.Mayo is special-they also have a tremendous endowment with many well-off contributors.They are not as dependent on hospital-generated revenue as most health-care entities. The fact that they are even contemplating leaving Medicare is an ominous sign. Mayo doesn’t change much, but when it does it is like an earthquake-like moving into Arizona and Florida.
Posted by: Nephron | June 13, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
The Next 250 Billion,to be added to the Health care total,already. That should put us over the Trillion with some to spare,and the bill has not taken full effect yet…. Talk about being lied to,no increase in the deficit,no increase in Insurance Premiums,Lower health care costs, All Lies and More Lies….. Sheeple wake up.
Posted by: stormerF2 | June 13, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Limo Divers Protest Medicare Mediciad Reform Cuts, It’s rumored this issue could become part of the Tea Party movement. AmeriChoice Health also rumored to take a position on this issue. Recirculate those tax dollars? Help keep limo drivers working, benefits flowing and overpaid tax dollars remain in abuse.
Medicare.gov as well as other Federal agency’s encourage you to report any fraudulent activities, yet, the same government agency’s were notified the way this company does business yet did nothing. Three years ago they were reported to these Federal agency’s and as of todays date not only were they allowed to continue doing business but were never charged once. Protected vendor status sure, politics sure, limited government budgets sure, Federal and State officals looking the other way sure, and rather then stop these activities a strong desire not to rock the boat previals. Even with the vast changes in the laws, budgets,a hands off policy remains, you tell me what’s wrong with this picture?
The Government created this monster and now they don’t know what to do about it, like shooting yourself in your own foot etc. Tons of money to advance their national growth, it’s market positions, tons of money for political donations, tons of money to send 75 millIon back to its home office from New York state alone, tons of money to suppot National TV shows, tons of money to pay hugh State fines, tons of money to hire the very best law firms, tons of money to pay for bribes and kickbacks, tons of money for hugh salary’s and bonuses, all done on the back of the American tax payor, you see this company receives all it’s money from the Federal government. Should your tax dollars be held to a higher standard? Should our government agency’s responsible for there review and be held to that same standard? Should the IRS audit their corruption? Why has this company not been charged? How long can the buck be passed here in more ways then one?
Hey, it’s your tax dollars don’t complain now.. then don’t complain later on…
ps… I know times are tough for a lot us, but it would be great to have a free limo to go to the Doctors, Pharmacy, Movies, Grocery shopping, and given free tickets for the movies. Offered soda, pop corn and hotdogs, as well as have them receive free coupons for Grocery items…Kind of makes you wish qualified for Medicare and Mediciad right?
Posted by: Medicare Backlash | September 22, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Doctors Group Sues AmeriChoice TOM WILEMON | The Daily News
Mid-South Imaging & Therapeutics PA, a hospital-based group of more than 30 radiologists, has filed suit against AmeriChoice, accusing the insurance company of “unfair and deceptive trade practices.” The complaint, filed last week in Shelby County Chancery Court, according to The Daily News online, http://www.memphisdailynews.com, alleges the insurance company made a “phantom offer” to the state in regard to doing business with Mid-South Imaging.
“Because AmeriChoice has not had an opportunity to review Mid-South’s lawsuit and its allegations, we are not in a position to comment at this time,” said Roger Rollman, a spokesman for AmeriChoice. AmeriChoice is one of two companies the state is contracted with to provide TennCare coverage in West Tennessee. The doctors from Mid-South Imaging provide radiology services to patients of Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp.
The lawsuit comes after back-and-forth negotiations between the physicians group, the state and the insurance company, which is a division of United Healthcare of Tennessee. The insurance companies are owned by parent company United Health Group Inc. The complaint alleges that AmeriChoice is paying only 50 percent to 55 percent of the lowest rate paid by any other “equivalent network provider,” which in this case is Medicare. Daniel Van Horn, the lawyer representing Mid-South Imaging (MSIT), wrote about the negotiations in the complaint. “Beginning in January 2009, MSIT complained to the state about AmeriChoice’s failure to make any serious offer,” Van Horn stated. “The state responded to the MSIT complaint by talking with AmeriChoice. AmeriChoice falsely told the state that it had made an offer to MSIT in the range of 78 percent of Medicare – a phantom offer that was significantly higher than the 50 percent to 55 percent offer that it actually made.
“Upon learning of the alleged significantly higher offer as reported to the state by AmeriChoice, MSIT wrote AmeriChoice a letter dated June 11, 2009, offering to enter into a contract with MSIT at the originally offered shockingly low 50 percent to 55 percent reimbursement rate.” The physicians group cannot refuse to take AmeriChoice because it provides radiology services to a hospital, according to the complaint. MSIT is seeking compensatory damages, a declaratory judgment that AmeriChoice’s actions constitute “unfair or deceptive trade practice” and an injunction against the insurance company in relation to its reimbursement rates
Posted by: The Game Played | September 25, 2010, 7:02 am 7:02 am