Sources: Justice Department to File Lawsuit Against Arizona Immigration Law, Likely Next Week
Obama administration sources tell ABC News that Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to file a lawsuit against the state of Arizona for its immigration law, likely next week.
The suit has been expected for some time now. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a South American television interviewer that the president had told the Justice Department to file the suit on the basis that it's the constitutional responsibility of the federal government — not states — to set immigration policy.
"President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy," Clinton told the interviewer on station NTN 24. "And the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”
Holder is expected to also claim in his suit that the Arizona law will be enforced in a way that could cause discrimination based on race and nationality.
- Jake Tapper
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
What is the basis for their lawsuit? Which talking point are they pursuing?
Posted by: N2vip | June 22, 2010, 7:16 am 7:16 am
ok, this article points out some good things, but this is not the issue we should be concerned with. I am against illegal immigration no matter for where the people come. Trust me I don’t like it at all and I think our federal and state governments need to crack down on that plus the employers, but I have never seen such a great oral argument for the arizona law being unstitutional until I came across this
Posted by: republicanblack | June 22, 2010, 7:22 am 7:22 am
I was for civil rights for everyone until terrorists took advantage of American hospitality. Now I say I am for HOMELAND SECURITY above all else. If you are stopped to see if you belong in this country, live with it. I am an American and proud of it. Any action that cuts down on illegal immigration gets my thumbs up. The federal government should learn from Arizona and take a stand. America, LOVE it or LEAVE it.
Posted by: toolmaker47 | June 22, 2010, 7:52 am 7:52 am
First, every law on the books “could be enforced in such a way that could cause discrimination on the basis of race and nationality.” A law is not unconstitutional based on mere speculation of how it “could” be enforced. Second, where in the Constitution does it say that states cannot protect their own citizens against murder, robbery, drug cartels, etc.? Finallly and more to the point, the Federal Government has set immigration policy through laws on the books THAT IT IS NOT ENFORCING to the detriment of American citizens (and even those who aren’t citizens). This has utterly been the most divisive administration in this Nation’s history. I’m wondering if before this is all over we will even be a “United” states!
Posted by: DanaDee | June 22, 2010, 7:53 am 7:53 am
What is the basis for their lawsuit? Which talking point are they pursuing?
posted by N2vip
Posted by: malcat | June 22, 2010, 8:01 am 8:01 am
What a joke! A US President suing one of his States!
The Gov. of Az. is protecting her fellow citizens, not illegal aliens!
Something Obama reverses..protects illegals and not citizens!
Obama goes around the country shutting down coal mining, now oil rigs, while using the excuse of safety on the job….but we have had thousands upon thousand of citizens killed by illegals!
He says nothing about this, nor does he care!
Posted by: dareisay | June 22, 2010, 8:02 am 8:02 am
He’s still a big joke….on us!!!
Posted by: M. Smith | June 22, 2010, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Disgusting.
Add this to Sen. Kyl’s remarks about Obama not enrfocing the border because the GOP won’t go along with Amnesty for illegals.
This admnistration is the absolute worst ever. Hoax & Change.
Posted by: FEDUP | June 22, 2010, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Time to impeach OBAMA and throw out the rest of the gang of politicians who are throwing our country to the illegals.
When illegals have more rights than legal citizens, we have a problem. They are getting all sorts of handouts, free legal service, interpretor services — and are getting citizenship for their illegal children dropped on our soil due to Misinterpretation of our 14th amendment. Time To work on all these issues — including making sure they are NOT coming illegally into our country through our unprotected borders.
These people are CRIMINALS … and when our government is FIGHTING STATES because they are enforcing immigration laws, it is time to get rid of those people in power. And when our government is ignoring revising the 14th amendment AND wanting to allow these criminals ( illegals ) amenesty and citizenship to their illegal children, etc, we need to all be writing our government officials – and our president, and making sure these things do not happen!
IF he continues, IMPEACH!!
Bad enough we have an outrageous stimulus package, a healthcare bill no one read AND passed due to bribing of the Congress ( which should be illegal – and those making and taking bribes held accountable ) – along with sheep mentality in our Congress, no protection at our borders, nothing being done about the illegals already in this country, and now this … wanting to bring charges against a LEGAL STATE enforcing things already on the books!
IMPEACH OBAMA
Posted by: cafe | June 22, 2010, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Glad to see I’m not the only one who has noticed this, but I really have a couple questions.
Aren’t these “illegal” aliens?
Why are the Federal Govt and ACLU suing to allow illegal activity to continue?
What civil or human right is being affected that the ACLU is getting involved?
Posted by: Lineworker56 | June 22, 2010, 8:24 am 8:24 am
We must face facts; Obama hates America.
His entire administration has worked against the majority of Americans. First it was healthcare, then it is energy policy, and now it is immigration.
Come November, it will be time to get real Americans back into government. Obama has to go.
Posted by: Bill Sanford | June 22, 2010, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Obama vs. the People.
Maybe Obama will argue that illegal immigrant drug lords, gang members, human traffickers, rapists, cop killers, terrorists, and drunk drivers are all doing the work that Americans won’t do.
Posted by: Mary | June 22, 2010, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Is this the same Department of Justice that allowed Port Chester New York citizens to place six votes for one candidate rather than one vote per six candidates.I always thought you were allowed to place one vote for one candidate. So if they had six candidates running for six postitions then you would vote for the best person in each position. Not in Port Chester you can cast all six votes for one person!!!!
Posted by: whathappened08 | June 22, 2010, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Pander, pander, pander… At least, this makes the choice clear in November. Another scheme to be relegated to the dustbin of history: using the Justice Department to harass law enforcement agencies enforcing the laws passed by the US Congress. I can’t wait until the Obama administration officials start wearing “kick me” signs to all their meetings. Maybe their self-destructive behavior will win them sympathy from their base… if they have any base left. :)
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | June 22, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am
More from The Obama Buffoon.
The staggering arrogance.
The dangerous narcissism.
The astounding incompetence.
The poisonous radicalism.
November can’t come soon enough… then on to 2012 to rid ourselves of this hack.
Posted by: Derrick | June 22, 2010, 8:55 am 8:55 am
So the federal government is going to sue a state for passing a law that says that a federal law must be enforced? Wow. Sublime.
Posted by: t22 | June 22, 2010, 8:55 am 8:55 am
So the US Government is suing a State for enacting a law that is almost word for word the Federal law concerning the same matter? So the US Government never intends to enforce its own law against these criminal aliens? (And YES, I did use the politically incorrect term CRIMINAL ALIENS- because that is what they are.)
Posted by: ellsbells930 | June 22, 2010, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Whatever happened to the KSM trial?
Whatever happened to closing GITMO?
Beer Summits anyone?
All of this from the crew who called us a nation of “Cowards”!
IMPEACH & DEPORT!
Posted by: FEDUP | June 22, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am
This suit’s been in the works, that’s never been in question. The biggest consideration isn’t the outcome so much as it is timing it with the November elections.
Posted by: smartlillena | June 22, 2010, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Did Holder even read the law yet? I hope it goes to the Supremes.
Posted by: bbach | June 22, 2010, 9:05 am 9:05 am
“The Gov. of Az. is protecting her fellow citizens, not illegal aliens!”
Whether intentionally ignorant or not, right-wingers don’t seem to be able to comprehend that the Feds are concerned the Arizona law is not protecting ALL citizens equally by encouraging racial profiling against CITIZENS of the US. But of course it wouldn’t be anywhere near the first time that biased full-time critics play dumb to get a cheap shot at the President.
Posted by: Skip | June 22, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am
We will not enforce the law of the land and we will sue you if you enforces the law of the land. Stupid is as Stupid does!!
Posted by: wallynm | June 22, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
” the Feds are concerned the Arizona law is not protecting ALL citizens equally by encouraging racial profiling against CITIZENS of the US.” – Skip
This is an unfounded concern and most likely just a Liberal/Progressive talking point. The White House is trying to use the border security as a bargaining chip to get Amnesty for illegal invaders. They want that so that they can increase the Democratic Voting Base since they lose voters each year the Baby Boomers mature and get more Conservative with acquired wisdom.
The White House is scared that other states will follow Arizona’s lead, then they lose their leverage and bye bye Amnesty. This is all political maneuvering with the Citizen’s of Arizona as the pawns who pay the price.
I’m guessing you just may understand all of this Skip but chose to ignore it.
Posted by: Noz | June 22, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am
More waste of your tax payer dollars. Obama has become a big joke, but the sad part the joke is on us the American People (legal) American People.
Posted by: Shebabam | June 22, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Obama 100,000,000 dollars to Haiti. O. K. it was a disaster a good thing to do, but who authorized it? 200,000,000 dollars to Palestinians once again who authorized it? Helping dead beat dads pay their child support? Suing the state of Arizona for doing what the Feds refuse to do? Forcing the head of a major corporation to step down? There was a recent article about a known terrorist coming across the Mexican border. Where is our protection?????
Posted by: Shebabam | June 22, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Obligatory Ayn Rand Quote:
This is where have came to…By electing so many Corrupt American hating Politicians that ignore our Constitution against Invasion, the Rule of Law and refuse to abide by their Oath of Office!
When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion — when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing — when you see money flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors — when you see that men get richer by graft and pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you — when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice — you may know that your society is doomed.
Posted by: Black Saint | June 22, 2010, 9:27 am 9:27 am
I’m unclear exactly what “policy” the administration thinks is being set in AZ other than that federal immigration laws should be enforced.
Apparently that’s a different policy than the Administration has.
One doesn’t need to be a fan of the AZ law (I’m not exactly) to see this for what it is – a taxpayer funded stunt to prop up sagging Democratic prospects in November.
Posted by: DCLawyer | June 22, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Now we can understand why Holder won’t move forward with KSM: he too is an illegal alien.
This incompetent president, who has no sense of right or wrong, no understanding of American values or accomplishments; no appreciation of the Constitution or his Constitutional responsibilities; no understanding or appreaciation of the free market has no business being president. How can anyone be so educated and yet so stupid when it comes to things that matter?
Obama’s administration didn’t do their job and we have a disaster in the Gulf that he makes worse daily by his inexperience; ineffective actions and total commitment to political cronyism rather than serving the Citizens.
His administration isn’t doing their job to protect the border. He took an oath to “take care that the laws of the US are faithfully executed” and clearly he is not doing that: that’s what an impeachable offense looks like.
As Alvin Greene clearly demonstrates we cannot rely on the ballot box so we need to impeach Obama now!
Posted by: fbanta | June 22, 2010, 9:29 am 9:29 am
This is no suprise coming from the Joker who let a guy from Mexico stand in front of Congress and tell them how we should run our country. Maybe he should control his side of the border and stop the flow of his citizens out of his country. This administration should go in the histroy books as the worst in history.
Posted by: David Steinbrink | June 22, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
So Obama is willing to waste money on an ignorant lawsuit?? Nice! The AZ law mimics the federal law, just AZ plans to actually uphold the law and not ignore it. I am annoyed that Obama is willing to waste my tax money on suing a state whose law I support!! I am annoyed that Obama is standing w/ the ILLegals instead w/ the REAL citizens of the country. The majority support the law, but I guess thats beyond him….UGH!
Posted by: LIFETL | June 22, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Our President and his administration are a complete and total joke. Worst President in HISTORY including the buffoon Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: dandydon | June 22, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
A few years ago Phoenix/Maricopa County, AZ was the #1 homebuilding county in this entire country. Whether they were welcomed or not, doesn’t matter, and the “fine the employer” line (that makes no sense) doesn’t matter. Now there are no jobs, and whosever at fault does not matter, the US citizens there (or anywhere else) shouldn’t be competing with Mexico for a job in the US.
To argue that illegals in the building industry are underpaid/taken advantage of is ignorance.
Posted by: smartlillena | June 22, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am
As usual the Obama administration has a tin ear. They just refuse to listen to the American people. They are so busy trying to ram an agenda down our throats they don’t seem to realize this is a democracy and in a few months we are going to have something to say about all of this tyranny! I am in my 7th decade of life and this is the first time I have seen a President just outright ignore the feelings of the American people on EVERY issue.
Posted by: SAH | June 22, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am
so the WH doesn’t want to enforce ILLEGAL immigration laws and they don’t want anyone else to either!
Posted by: morphy | June 22, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
“The White House is trying to use the border security as a bargaining chip to get Amnesty for illegal invaders”
The GOP, which never made any real effort before, is using this issue as diversion to stall on other issues like cap and trade. It’s going to backfire. Treating Hispanics as second class citizens might impress their right-wing friends but their insensitivity will cost them even more Hispanic votes…something they cannot afford long-term.
Posted by: Skip | June 22, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
If successful, will the Federal suit also affect the laws of other states? For example, California’s penal code includes language almost identical to that of the AZ law. The only difference is that CA does NOT enforce the law – which violates the law.
Here’s the citation from Calif. Penal Code Sec. 834b…
834b. (a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws.
(b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the following:
(1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding documentation to indicate his or her legal status.
(2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal justice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or leave the United States.
(3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal status and provide any additional information that may be requested by any other public entity.
(c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency, to prevent or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a) is expressly prohibited.
Posted by: MediaTechMadman | June 22, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am
This would be a frivolous lawsuit. It is only a reiteration of the Federal law except for the addition of a statement that law enforcement personnel can not arbitrarily stop someone in a discriminatory manner.
Posted by: Dale | June 22, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am
He uses our money to sue us for a law we want and they refuse to enforce. Fire them in 2012.
Posted by: sparko | June 22, 2010, 9:50 am 9:50 am
This just goes to show that the Government has no intentions of enforcing even the limited immigration policies we have. States have the right to protect and serve their citizens, protect their borders, and engage in policies and laws that the Federal Government is remiss on.
Posted by: uselessfederalgovt | June 22, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Yes, the federal government SHOULD be determining the immigration policy.
But if they refuse to do so, then why shouldn’t the states take matters into their own hands, especially when the problem affects them DIRECTLY?
The federal government wants to do nothing while getting paid for it, and aparently expects the state governments to do the same.
Posted by: Hosfac | June 22, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
i dont know what the beef is, ths spring we took a trip to arizonas southern border and were stopped several times to check if we were legal or smuggling illegals.this has been going on for a long time and the feds dont need a reason to stop you.
Posted by: loren sims | June 22, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
This must mean they will be co-defendants in the suit they have filed. Arizona law is a federal law, that the feds do not enforce as such when the feds reject a point it is the states right to step up. So are they going to annual all sovereign rights granted to state government and usurp enemas all of the freedoms that entails in one fell swoop? Time will tell how far the change will go……
Posted by: James Brown Lord | June 22, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Well if the Federal Government won’t protect the states, then they’ll have to protect themselves! It would be a different story if say, “Afghani’s” were illegally crossing our borders. Maybe it’s just OK for Mexicans.
Posted by: dmm | June 22, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I’m having a problem understanding something. Republicans support big business and big business wants illegal aliens. That means that the Republicans are at fault for our illegal alien problem. Got that part. …. The last amnesty vote to hit the Senate was split almost purely along party lines with Democrats voting for amnesty and Republicans against. Democrats are now pushing another amnesty bill. …. I’m confused. ;- ( ….. I guess Republicans promote crime by keeping them illegal and Democrats deal with criminal activity by making it legal? …. I’m still confused. LOL
Posted by: achillies | June 22, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Maybe the Federal Government should save the money for something more important, like $1.25 million to save the red squirrels in Arizona. Look, stop spending more of my hard earned money on things I’ve already paid for. Since this administration does not want to deal with issues, let’s applaud Arizona for doing what the Washington bureaucraps should have done in the first place.
Posted by: Joe | June 22, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
This administration is a disgrace. Siding with criminals.
Posted by: Kathy | June 22, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
I wonder if Holder has read the either law yet or perhaps he is waiting for Spanish versions.
Posted by: montucky | June 22, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
“This must mean they will be co-defendants in the suit they have filed. Arizona law is a federal law”
Any State Law that mirrors Federal Law is unconstitutional and therefore it must be eliminated immediately.
That is what the constitution says anyway…
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
I feel it should be up to the state to decide since the government allows to many people into the United States from other countries that should not be here.
Look at the crime rate in one state alone most that commit the crimes look where they are from.
How dare the president of Mexico come here & on American soil & make statements like he did,let him keep his people in his country & provide for them.The U.S.A.has a lot of problems with the economy being bad & the people that were born & raised here can’t survive the way things are.Enough is Enough.
Posted by: Teddy | June 22, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
The state of Arizona is not setting immigration policy. They are only asking their law enforcement officials to protect the citizens from murder, theft, rape, burglaries, drug smuggling, and human traffickers, by giving them the legal power to detain illegal aliens, instead of just dropping them off back at the US/Mexico border, which has become nothing more than a turnstile.
Posted by: Dale | June 22, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am
The POTUS doesn’t mind playing politics with citizens lives and well being. Doesn’t really like most of us anyway. He is failing on the oil leak, failing in Afganistan, failing to secure our on borders, failing to listent to the will og the PEOPLE but doing a great job of golfing (39 times in 500 days), attending concerts and date nights + meeting all those sports teams. Fiddling while we all burn.
Posted by: Phil B | June 22, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am
What is it about ILLEGAL is not understood by this administration. It is absurd that our law enforcement needs permission to request proof of legal citizenship & residency. We visited Mexico in February and were told to carry our papers with us AT ALL TIMES. I am in complete support of Arizona’s law. For our Federal Government to sue a state for trying to make it easier for officers to catch persons who have broken the law and usurped the legal process available to all to become a tax-paying citizen of the United States is OBSCENE!! Save our tax dollars and allow the officers to do their jobs. ILLEGAL – the White House needs a dictionary!
Posted by: CJohnson | June 22, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Good. Now the truth will come out about this white house and why it does not want to enforce the laws of this land. Maybe we can be done with Obama after this and see him get kicked out of office so someone can save the nation.
Posted by: Jim Rod | June 22, 2010, 10:22 am 10:22 am
this is not out of disrespect but a truth – - actually it is a truth that deserves disrespect.
where is the smart element in going against a law approved by 71% of the citizens of that State? why is this happening? is there no one who can point out to obama and holder that they have bliners on?
first yu immediately make enemies because you aleready KNOW that across the board America agrees with Arizona averaged out to 80% and AZ itself is polling at 71%, so where is your logic that fighting against this is a wise thing to do?
anyone else as perplexed about this as I?
Posted by: be guided by facts | June 22, 2010, 10:22 am 10:22 am
When the lawsuit is filed, will it be in english and spanish?
Posted by: rednek1947 | June 22, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am
The federal government doesn’t enforce the immigration laws, then Arizona takes matters into its own hands, then the government tries to punish them for doing so, I guess we know where the white house stands on immigration, the illegal aliens make a big voting block for the establishments tyranny. Surely don’t want to get rid of them do they?
Posted by: Sideeous | June 22, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am
What part of “illegal” don’t I understand?
The part where it says it has to be forever.
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am
1. when you dishonor your oath to protect America you have created an impeachable act.
2. by telling americans to stay clear of a specific portion of Arizona because its “too dangerous” you are admitting a dangerous situation exists as a result of illegal immigration.
3. by telling americans as stated above to stay clear, you are giving a message to terrorists and illegals that they are safe to cross at a specific portion where they will not be interrupted. WAS THIS INTENTIONAL?
4. ANY CRIME REMAINS A CRIME. a tired phrase but the truth: ILLEGAL is not legal.
5.if criminals breaked out of a jail and began pouring into another State by hundreds and you had them on video(or not) would you tell the State to which they are coming into to “leave them alone or you will sue them” ????
6. you arrest American Criminals but let foreign crminals go free?
7. when you say you will sit on the side of the courtroom with the lllegal drug smugglers, rapists, border-jumpers, human traffickers AGAINST an elected Governor of a u.s. State and the people of that State what should we make of you?
would it be safe for us to treat you with disrespect and call you a traitor?
Posted by: be guided by facts | June 22, 2010, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Very simply: ILLEGAL IS ILLEGAL! Please Arizona, for the good of the entire U.S.A. don’t ever back down on this!
Posted by: SOXFAN73 | June 22, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am
There was a post that said how could the obama admin be against a law approved by 70% of people. The answer is simple. You don’t let the public opinion decide legislation that promotes discrimination. If we did that, we would still be allowing the south to discriminate against blacks and segregation. Its too bad that in today’s “enlightened” America we still find racism alive and thriving in the south, but finding it in Arizona is more shocking.
Posted by: Lenovo67 | June 22, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am
“If successful, will the Federal suit also affect the laws of other states? ”
No, the idea of a _centralized_ administration is that every state has its own, inconsistent approach to immigration policy.
I am being sarcastic, in case you didn’t notice.
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am
“This must mean they will be co-defendants in the suit they have filed.”
Any State Law that mirrors Federal Law is unconstitutional and therefore it must be eliminated immediately.
That is what the constitution says anyway…
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 10:35 am 10:35 am
The White House is not doing their job. I can see why Arizona has taken responsibility to protect it’s citizens. As far as I am concerned everyone should be profiled. Just maybe we would not the problems we do if this was actively done. There is no discrimination when a person is pulled over by the police and asked for identification.
Posted by: Lara | June 22, 2010, 10:35 am 10:35 am
The boycott runs both ways indeedy.
How many ways do I boycott thee?
Let me count the ways…
Arizona Los Angeles
Arizona San Francisco
Arizona Oakland
Arizona Sacramento
Arizona West Hollywood
Arizona Seattle
Arizona Chicago
Arizona Austin
Arizona St. Paul, MN
Arizona Milwaukee
Arizona Boulder
Arizona Boston
Arizona Springfield, MA
Arizona Worcester, MA
Arizona Brookline, MA (JFK’s birthplace)
Arizona New York City
Arizona Washington, DC
on the international side:
Arizona Mexico (and the rest of Latin America)
Arizona The UN
…and last, but not least:
Arizona Phoenix
Arizona Tucson
Arizona Flagstaff
Additionally, you may want to question the White House and the US
Chamber of Commerce:
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Illegal people are coming in with arms with the intent to kill anyone who looks to be a threat to them.
I am convinced that Obama is a muslim and a silent radical muslim. Terrorists from pakistan are crossing the border and this is why obama is doing what he’s doing.
America is in trouble . . .
Posted by: David | June 22, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
“How dare the president of Mexico come here”
Care to show us the constitution (chapter and verse) where it says that Presidente Calderon cannot do what he did? All democrats and 1/2 the republicans stood up and applauded him.
Tha basis for your comment is that you seem to confuse Congress with your own home. Look carefully and you will notice they are not the same thing.
You may want to read the First Amendment, since you claim to be such patriot.
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am
What absolute and utter hypocrisy–and a disgrace to this nation and its people.
Posted by: Jarhead | June 22, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Can’t you just see the arguments now:
Holder: Federal law covers this situation.
Arizona: That’s true, but you’re not enforcing the law.
Holder:
Posted by: Roxanna | June 22, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Screw Holder and screw Obama. AZ ought to countersue these two Socialist stooges for ABDICATING their Constitutional duties. I don’t blame the illegal immigrants that want to flee Mexico and come here to make some money fior their families. Mexico is a freaking disgrace of a country replete with corrupt elites and pathetic wimpering sheep for a population. If Mexicans had any cojones, instead of sneaking across the border to the US, they would organize and march on Mexico City to DEMAND reform. Instead, these hardworking but cowardly people have chosen to flee the intrinsic corruption and rampant drug violence to become a burden on the United States taxpayers, driving down labor rates and swamping hospital emergency rooms without any insurance or way to pay. I challenge anyone on this forum to explain to me how it is fair or equitable for the United States to be the welfare state for Mexico? If you oppose securing the border or allowing illegals to stay in the country, please sign up to personally pay for the medical and educational costs for at least one family. Otherwise, you are nothing but loudmouthed hypocrites who are very generous with OTHER PEOPLE’s money.
Posted by: Veritas Supreme | June 22, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
The Obama administration is standing against the will of the American people. That should tell voters of things to come. They evidently don’t give a hoot what we think.
Posted by: oonogil | June 22, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Since SB1070 has been approved, the violence toward immigrants in AZ has become severely and ineasingly fierce.
As reported on the local news a few days ago there is a neo-nazi affiliated military group with a truck load of automatic weapons, they are in full camouflage including dressing like bush, they admit to being in the desert so they can pick off illegals crossing the boarder through the desert. They are cold blooded killers with the the local government full knowing of their purpose or mission and the only comment made about their activity is “They are not bringing the SB1070 any favorable attention”, a comment by the local sherrif. Since when had this country allowed any citizen to be judge and jury without a trial, and since when has tresspassing become a death sentence offence. I think about reporters and students, and just innocent persons who wandered into enemy territory in foreign countries who are imprisoned right now what if that country just executed them for wandering into their territory? I thought the US was more civilized, but after seeing this behavior and the government openly acknowledging it but doing nothing to prevent the murder of people who only want to work to support their families I think we are not different than the other countries who have less severe penalties than death for tresspassing. There were two men murdered on the I-8 two weeks ago, it was ‘assumed’ they were involved they were either involved in drug smuggling or human smuggling and the investigation was dropped or swept under the carpet. It was because they were Hispanic these assumption was made. The fact is violence toward immigrants is not a priority in AZ never has been. AZ has one of the highest crime rates in the country and immigrants are the biased focus. They are more often the victim of crime than the perpetrators. And the crimes against them are horrific. This issue is a cover up for AZ law enforcement who have such a poor record for solving crime. It’s has to be blamed on something beyond their control or they look like they can’t do their job. The media has been used to feed hysteria to the public, to spread the myths about immigrants, crime and violence, not that there isn’t a problem with human trafficking or drug smuggling but the average immigrant is not involved, they are here to work to support their families. Yes, we need immigration reform laws but not the kind that breed violence, and racism. This is a political ploy a game, pure politics in AZ.
Posted by: CJV | June 22, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
It would be appropriate for Mexico to join the boycott! All illegals should be recalled to Mexico to show their outrage at Arizona!!!!!
Posted by: MarkD | June 22, 2010, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Does the President and his Administration have disdain for police? It appears so. First, he said the Cambridge police acted “stupidly”, even though he admitted he didn’t know all the circumstances. Once this law passed, Obama and Holder came out and declared that it would create racial profiling, even though Holder said he didn’t read the law. The police will be responsible for upholding the law, not citizens. So, why such disdain?
Posted by: djaymick | June 22, 2010, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Also, I challenge ANYONE on this forum to explain why the United States should not simply implement and enforce the very same laws on immigration that Mexico has in place. You bleeding hearts might want to take a trip down to Mexico’s southern border and see how Mexico and its moronic and corrupt El Presedente treat people trying to cross Mexico’s southern border.
Posted by: Veritas Supreme | June 22, 2010, 10:59 am 10:59 am
I am an independent voter who voted for Obama because I thought we needed change from the previous eight years. I am extremely disappointed. I will not be voting for Obama again.
Posted by: Christimarie | June 22, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Waste more of our money filing this lawsuit! Where are the brains of this country? The racist’s that voted for Obama will be very sorry. He was brought up on “God dam America”! He has not proven his birth in the USA. Not eligible for presidency. Arizona’s governor is the smartest of all! She is protecting her state from all who breaks the law while the Federal government has failed.
Posted by: Virginia Nordin | June 22, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Missouri has a law very similar to Arizona, and so does Oklahoma.
Some 30 cities are unanimously boycotting Arizona (not OK or MO). Why?
Why is Arizona the only target?
Here is the fundamental fact that explains why Arizona has such unique status:
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
“I challenge ANYONE on this forum to explain why the United States should not simply implement and enforce the very same laws on immigration that Mexico has in place.”
Because we are a sovereign nation?
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Calderon is a joke and a blatant hypocrite. He criticizes AZ’s law while saying NOTHING about Mexico’s laws on immigration which are exponentialy more restrictive. The fact is that Calderon is a corrupt weakling and like most Mexicans is simply too scared to take the steps necessary to reform his country, which with its rich natural resources and beautiful coastlines should EASILY be able to provide for ots own population. Let’s stop the PC crap with Calderon and tell the truth. Calderon is a puppet for the corrupt elites and drug dealers and the Mexican people are largely a bunch of cowards, too frightened to stand up to their corrupt government. The time for revolution in Mexico is long overdue. Don’t Mexicans have any pride or are they truly the dishonest, corrupt, and cowardly sheep that they appear to be in tolerating the current situation? I would be ASHAMED if my country had to depend on another country to provide welfare for 12-20 million of my citizens. Apparently, Mexicans are okay with that sad state of affairs.
Posted by: Veritas Supreme | June 22, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am
“Please Arizona, don’t ever back down on this!”
If they don’t back down, we Yankees will have no resource but sending another Sherman down there.
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Wake up America….immagration is killing our tax base..these stupid politicians pander and cater to any voting base. Get these illegals out of here our country economics have changed for good. We cant afford illegals!!!
Fight for your country!
Posted by: bob | June 22, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am
“The suit has been expected for some time now. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a South American television interviewer that the president had told the Justice Department to file the suit on the basis that it’s the constitutional responsibility of the federal government — not states — to set immigration policy.”
Yes, and that policy has been set for some time now. The problem is that it is also the responsibility of the federal government to enforce the law of the land and, because they have failed in their duty to America, the states and cities have to do the job that the feds won’t do.
Posted by: John Locke | June 22, 2010, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Virginia Nordin wrote: “Waste more of our money filing this lawsuit! Where are the brains of this country? The racist’s that voted for Obama will be very sorry. He was brought up on “God dam America”! He has not proven his birth in the USA. Not eligible for presidency. Arizona’s governor is the smartest of all! She is protecting her state from all who breaks the law while the Federal government has failed.”
AMEN!!!!!!! The feds haven’t done their job dealing with the illegals and have no business going after the states/cities who are trying to do it instead. Shut up, BO, and get busy — make the feds enforce the law or get out of the way and let the state/local governments do it!
Posted by: JustMe | June 22, 2010, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Remember this: Amnesty is the cause of illegal immigration, not its cure.
Posted by: John Locke | June 22, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Our country is under attack by another country, (Mexico) our boarders are not safe, and Arizona has had the backbone to enforce a federal law already on the books.The federal goverment should be deploying troops anong the border instead of suing a US state for protecting it`s self. The federal government gladly sends thousands of US troops around the globe to protect foriegn boarders and many young men and women have lost their lives for no apparent reason other than to please the policy of a government who doesn`t care about them, When will our country be a safe place to live? The Obama administration, like the others before it, turn a blind eye to illegals crossing our boarders freely, using our schools, healthcare, driving our streets, committing crimes, and filling up our prisions. Who should be suing who?
Posted by: Chris | June 22, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am
it has become an invasion, we the citizens of the USA should sue the justice dep. for failure to impose a lawful law, one that is much more stricture than AZ law, it was listed on the HOMELAND SECURITY web site, you can find it in the “PATRIOT ACT”
Posted by: bkododge | June 22, 2010, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Ramon F Herrera – First off, I doubt that you are a “Yankee”. Second, what does being a sovereign nation have to do with implementing immigration laws that mirror Mexico’s? Being a sovereign nation allows us to do just that. Your posts indicate you are a hack. I wonder if that is your real name or if you are just baiting people to start arguments and prevent any real discussion of the issue?
Posted by: War919 | June 22, 2010, 11:18 am 11:18 am
bob – “If they don’t back down, we Yankees will have no resource but sending another Sherman down there.”
******************
Come “get us” racist, hood-wearing Arizonans. The majority of the state DARES you to…
I’m sure you’ll be leading the charge, right?
Posted by: B | June 22, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am
“Ramon F Herrera – First off, I doubt that you are a “Yankee”.
Genuine, from Cambridge. You may inquire at MIT about me.
Unless you claim that Yankees cannot have Hispanic names, which is racist.
Posted by: Ramon F Herrera | June 22, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
I question the fact that this is your name. I also like how you only answer questions with inane comments that do not, in fact, answer the question. Clearly a shill.
Posted by: War919 | June 22, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
“The White House is scared that other states will follow Arizona’s lead, then they lose their leverage and bye bye Amnesty. This is all political maneuvering with the Citizen’s of Arizona as the pawns who pay the price.” – Noz
I disagree, we all are the pawns who’ll pay the price when the Radical Islamic Extremist Cell that entered the USA from Mexico sets off a bomb in a US City.
President NoBo has a responsibility to secure the border regardless of losing the influx of future democrat voters.
Posted by: Noz | June 22, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
And you ignore the real questions and focus on nonsense.
Posted by: War919 | June 22, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
How about the Obanana’s Oath of Office “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Posted by: poetopoet | June 22, 2010, 11:24 am 11:24 am
“Justice Department to File Lawsuit Against Arizona Immigration Law”
Your federal tax dollars at work.
Posted by: oonogil | June 22, 2010, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Our leaders in government have turned a blind eye to illegal immigrants long enough.
Now a state with a governor who had enough backbone to turn the table is being scorned by the Obama administration, boycotted by other states, and illegals are allowed to protest for their rights. This would be somewhat amusing if not totally ridiculous and despicable.
If you want to know your rights as an illegal, go to another country without legal papers, passport, etc,. and your rights will be looking through cell bars. If you are illegal you have no rights. Before anyone blows a fuse about my views, I believe in pursuing a better way of life, following and fulfilling the American dream, but do it legally.
I myself am an immigrant of Hungary and migrated legally, earned my citizenship papers by learning the Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the U.S., pledge to flag, history of presidents, and most of all learned to speak the language of the soil my feet stepped on. And I never cost taxpayers a cent.
Unfortunately we have an administration that is building a purchased voting bloc with immigration reform allowing more illegals to pour in costing taxpayers billions of dollars and depleting more jobs needed by American citizens. We need to close the borders. We cannot sustain all the illegals pouring into the country.
Posted by: Spicolas Wetterback | June 22, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
I will just like to point out Democrats do not need to pass comprehensive immigration reform to get the bulk of Latino votes. Really, Republicans have done the work for them. Republicans have been pushing anti-illegal immigration laws for a long time. In California, Pete Wilson rode anti-illegal immigration fever and Proposition 187 to win re-election as governor in 1994. Proposition 187 was later ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge, because it infringed the federal government’s exclusive jurisdiction over matters relating to immigration. The aftermath of Proposition 187: Republicans have not been able to win a significant statewide election since, with one exception. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is the only Republican to win a California gubernatorial, senatorial, or presidential election since 1994. He does not support Proposition 187.
Posted by: FYI | June 22, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Apparently the “Justice” dept is unaware that illegal immigrants are criminals.
Posted by: Bob | June 22, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Our leaders in government have turned a blind eye to illegal immigrants long enough.
Now a state with a governor who had enough backbone to turn the table is being scorned by the Obama administration, boycotted by other states, and illegals are allowed to protest for their rights. This would be somewhat amusing if not totally ridiculous and despicable.
If you want to know your rights as an illegal, go to another country without legal papers, passport, etc,. and your rights will be looking through cell bars. If you are illegal you have no rights. Before anyone blows a fuse about my views, I believe in pursuing a better way of life, following and fulfilling the American dream, but do it legally.
I myself am an immigrant of Hungary and migrated legally, earned my citizenship papers by learning the Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the U.S., pledge to flag, history of presidents, and most of all learned to speak the language of the soil my feet stepped on. And I never cost taxpayers a cent.
Unfortunately we have an administration that is building a purchased voting bloc with immigration reform allowing more illegals to pour in costing taxpayers billions of dollars and depleting more jobs needed by American citizens. We need to close the borders. We cannot sustain all the illegals pouring into the country.
Posted by: Spicolas Wetterback | June 22, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am
I think that it good that their doing this because really it is discrimination cause there going to stop you if you look illegal. Really people if you don’t agree I think thats dumb like put yourself in our place you would be do the same thing. You would be fighting it too!!
Posted by: NIKKI MOROYOQUI | June 22, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am
and now, the direct attack on our sovereignty.
Posted by: smokepipe12345 | June 22, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Arizona does plan to country sue the feds for not doing the job that they are supposed to do not the ones the select to do. CVJ wrote about 2 men shot to death south of the I-8 corridor. It is the main track that the drug haulers use, they attack each other all of the time stealing each others drugs. That is why they had armed guards with the drug ” mules” and they usually kill each other. I have lived in theis state from birth but have traveled the planetyy. i have had to produce my papers in every country I visit, have to show them on a regular baisi. Why is it that mexicans believe that they are special and do not need papers?
I do request something of poster, i know it is easy to hate people that you have never met or had to experience the problems that start situations like this, but please do not distort or manufacture supposed truths. The armed truck full of autoimatis weapons line from CVJ id total bunk. If he would figure out that American citizens are not allowed to have automatic weapons and then parade them around where others can see and report them. Get it right of don’t blow lies around.
For all of you that do not believe that has become a problem, why not pack your families up and come on down to the border for a little camping trip. Don’t forget your sunscreen and bullet proof vest.
Posted by: The curmudgeon speaks | June 22, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I think the WH can set their immigration policy, but who is disputing it????? The AZ law is providing enforcement assistance to the federal law, not policy. Obama plans to hold border security hostage until he can get amnesty through for all illegal immigrants. Then all the drug dealers and murders in AZ will be US citizens and can vote for Obama in the next election.
Posted by: James L. | June 22, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“We Yankees will have no resource but sending another Sherman down there.” —
I think the word you were looking for is ‘recourse’.
High capacity semi-auto rifles are either illegal or restricted in most northern states and I’ve seen a lot of yankees shoot. Long range, you’re not too impressive so what are you going to come after us with?
My AR is sighted in at 300 yards. My .270 is zeroed at 400.
Do you think your airsoft will get that far?
Posted by: oonogil | June 22, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am
What needs to happen, I think is that the Federal Government and Arizona need to work together and come up with a reasonable law that protects these borders. I dont think this lawsuit is necessary but I’m not a legal expert.Im also guessing that this area is high crime like high crime in other areas of our country. Places where police practices are a little more intense. I hear the wording has changed on the Arizona law, but it should no longer include ” if you are suspected of being an illegal alien” because that will lead to racial profiling. Maybe there should just be frequent i.d. checks where everyone is subjected to this i.d check so not only ” foreign looking” residents are subject to this police presense
Posted by: TV | June 22, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am
oonogil, how about the 50cals out now,single shot and good for distance. I am a fair long shot and 400 is for beginners.
Posted by: The curmudgeon speaks | June 22, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am
It is time for the State of Arizona to sue the Obama Administration for failure to enforce America’s immigration laws and for failure to secure our borders.
Arizona is literally fighting for its survival while Obama is playing politics in an attempt to grant citizenship to millions of undocumented Democrats.
Posted by: MikeMca | June 22, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Too bad the citizens can’t file a lawsuit against the federal government for NOT having an AZ-type law.
Posted by: The_Mick | June 22, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I think this will be the final straw for this administration. I have tried to be supportive and optimistic, but despite public opinion in favor of cracking down on illegal immigration, this administration, rather than working with states to solve the problem fights them in court. Taxpayer money would be better spent working with states to stop the flow of illegal immigrants into this country.
To top it off, this administration didn’t even have the decency to make this announcement to the American taxpayers first, the news was first broken when an administration official announced on Equadoran television that the law suit would be brought against Arizona. That was a significant slap in the face to the American people, and not one that this independent voter will get over anytime soon — at least not before the 2012 election.
Posted by: Simply me | June 22, 2010, 11:57 am 11:57 am
What part of *illegal* do people not understand?? Get all of them the hell out of this country!! And KEEP them out! I would vote for the governor of Arizona for President tomorrow!! At least she had some balls!! OBAMA ADMINISTRATION LISTEN UP: The MAJORITY of voting legal American citizens AGREE with the Arizona law!!!
Posted by: Lorna | June 22, 2010, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Holder can go sue himself.
Posted by: Holder is a Joke | June 22, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
People, oonogil said it perfectly. AZ is not setting policy. Just mandating that all state and local officials enforce the federal policies to the best of their abilities. The Obama administration is posturing to get latino votes.
Posted by: Joe | June 22, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
TV,
The federal government and Arizona is working together, despite what the Arizona governor claimed. The U.S. immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reported that 387,790 illegal immigrants were removed in 2009, and it projected the number to rise to a record 400,000 in 2010. In other words, the federal government is deporting illegal immigrants at a faster rate under Obama than Bush (or for that matter, any previous administrations). ICE credited cooperation between ICE and local law enforcement for the record number of deportations.
Posted by: FYI | June 22, 2010, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
As a naturalized citizen, I am shocked that the American Justice Department should sue the State of AZ for a law adopted by American citizens to protect themselves from illegal immigration. It is embarrassing for the U.S. to join forces with other countries to condemn the AZ law passed by Americans! The U.S. is now the greatest debtor nation in the world and our labor markets are overflowing. Why not enact some sort of immigration moratorium and enforce our immigration laws as strictly as Mexico does?
Yeh Ling-Ling
Alliance for a Sustainable USA
Posted by: Yeh Ling-Ling | June 22, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Upholding the concept of freedom of the world and liberty to all has absolutely nothing to do with illegal aliens. Nor does it come down to Federal or State enforcement.
Illegal aliens has always been about big business not wanting to hire US citizens because it costs them more.
This is about cheap labor. Period.
Indian fill every datacenter in the US. They are neither poor, nor escaping war or anything else. But they work cheap. AND, none pay taxes. They are all contractors who keep the dollars stolen from US citizens and send it back to India just like the latins do.
Our federal govt. is controlled by Big Business. They are puppets who vote as directed.
In short, this is no longer a government of the people.
Posted by: SlappyChuckles | June 22, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Obama keeps putting immigration off because his granmother was denied citizenship.
Posted by: cds | June 22, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Great! Now we once again have a soverign American state being forced to enter a conflict with the over reaching federal government of the United States. Does the Civil War ring a bell?
Bring it I say.
Posted by: Ronald H | June 22, 2010, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Slappychuckles”…your 12:24 post is EXACTLY RIGHT…but how do we convince the “dumbed down right” of this??? They are the ones that keep “backlash voting” the conservatives back in who are joined to the hip with greedy big businesses. And they are not even smart enough to understand they are voting against themselves and their own socioeconomic status, which is badly in decline.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
FYI- the drug cartels have now set up hideouts within the United States of America! They are armed and they are within the boarders of the USA. Anyone out there care about that?
Posted by: Linda Gray | June 22, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Where is the story about Obama holding the border hostage until he gets all of what he wants?? This president is a what in for me person and cares less about America.
Posted by: Jim Rod | June 22, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Why is the Obama Administration worried about the Az law since it mirrors the Federal Law? Maybe Obama is afraid to keep illegals out so there will not be a push for immigration reform? Is that why he will not send troops to stop the flood of illegals? Is securing our borders not in Obama’s plan?
Posted by: stormerF2 | June 22, 2010, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Most everyone posting here doesn’t live in Arizona like I do,and they don’t see all of the ”Hate Groups”that are behind this FARCE. As we speak organizations associated with the KKK have assembled at the border with high powered rifles ready to hunt ”Brown People”. Is this what this country has come too?? In fact Police orginizations all along the Arizona/Mexico border claim that violent crime along the border has decreased over the past three years. I wonder then, why this is such a ”hot button” issue now? Could it be that the local Republicans are batteling for their political lives because of all the corruption? Of course highlighting Illegal Immigration is a great way of taking the spotlight off of their failures and corruption.It’s a smokescreen put up by the racist government of Arizona and each and everyone of you have had way too much of the Kool Aid…
Posted by: Jessie Garcia | June 22, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
The Obama administration needs to focus on the problems already hurting our country and not dabble in the affairs at the state level. Leave that to the state. Their state budget is collapsing because of the lack of federal immigration reform, so they had to act.
Posted by: Mr. David | June 22, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Yes! Finally! I’m all for them fighting this law! It hasn’t even gone into effect yet and I’m already finding a bunch of stories coming out of Arizona about racial profiling since the day after Brewer signed it. I live in Nebraska which isn’t even a border state and they want to do that here. Our immigration problem in NE is minimal compared to Arizona. I hope they bring a lawsuit against my state if they decide to do the same.
Posted by: Kayla71482 | June 22, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
God bless Mexico.
Posted by: douglac | June 22, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Linda Gray, we all care about crime. To say people don’t care about crime or drug cartells of for the well being of this nation because people don’t agree with they way it is to be handled is very closed minded. This your either with me or against me attitude is killing this country. The fact is these folks are not forcing drugs on us we as a nation are demanding them. I would suggest everyone focus on the cause of the problem. Demand for cheap labor and drugs. That’s all us, not them. How many business owners do you know that have been arrested for hiring illegal immagrants? That is another issue we have in this country. We let the rich white man get away with everything and blame everyone else.
Posted by: tejasoutlaw | June 22, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Jessie Garcia, In fact, it is you who are using fear mongering and scare tactics. No one on the border is “hunting Brown people.” Those who are in favor of Arizona’s legislation want one thing – equal enforcement of immigration laws, with no preference for race or nation of origin – That means everyone is expected to follow the same rules, regardless of what they look like or where they come from. NO one is above the law.
Those fighting against the law feel that in fact, one group of people should be above the law.
by the way, I am in Arizona and can attest that many of the people (myself included) who are for the law are in fact legal immigrants and long time residents who are tired of the sense of entitlement illegal immigrants seem to flaunt throughout the country. Illegal immigrants, because they start their life in America by diregarding immigration law, simply give legal immigrants a bad name.
Posted by: livin' on the border | June 22, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
@ Jessie Garcia….please site your credible sources about the KKK groups and which police organizations are citing a drop in border violence. The good people of Texas sure don’t see that stat!
Posted by: Lorna | June 22, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
As you know…..If Arizona wins, the entire country wins.—And, if Arizona loses, the entire country loses.—Gov Brewer and Arizona cannot count on the Attorney General to defend Arizona and its laws, as he is a loony left liberal who has publicly spoken out against Arizona’s laws.—Therefore, please make a donation—no matter how small–to Arizona’s legal defense fund at
Posted by: Sue | June 22, 2010, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
TO HELL WITH HOLDER AND OBAMA!
You can help the people of Arizona by contributing to Governor Brewer’s Border Security & Immigration Legal Defense Fund. Put your money where your mouth is and SEND THEM A DONATION!
To paraphrase that classic liberal exhortation:
Do it for YOUR children!
Posted by: Diogenes Truthseeker | June 22, 2010, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Reply to Linda Gray’s 12:31 post…and the Mafia has been entrenched in our society for how long? So how does your point of the cartels (which I doubt you have the proof of – no “Faux News” doesn’t count) justify a bigoted law like this. It is a bigoted, racial profiling law…that is all it is. And it was done just to “emotionally fire up the right wing base”.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
The DEMOCRAT Attorney General, ( who will not be defending the State of Arizona for possible conflict of intrest), even says the Obama lawsuit is ridiculous and cannot prevail.
Termed a huge taxpayer waste, is there anything left to see, but sedition from Holder by siding with the Aztlan builders declaring war on the USA?
The majority of the USA wants to back Arizona.
Buy Arizona …it is good for the Country.
Their Governor has a defense fund growing by leaps and bounds.
At least sending money there is an investment here, not an outsource to India super-hiways committed to by Geithner or some other outlandish poppycock.
Posted by: Nero Observer | June 22, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I agree that it is the federal government’s responsibility to secure the borders. The problem is that they are deliberately refusing to to do so. Unless the administration has a plan – preferably one that eliminates the unmerited entitlements that motivates people to enter illegally – the schism between the state/citizens and federal government will only continue to widen.
Posted by: Publius | June 22, 2010, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
NOW WASHINGTON WANTS A SHOWDOWN AND GO AFTER A WOMAN. OBAMA BETTER KNOW A WOMAN WITH A MADE UP MIND IS NOT GOING TO ROLL OVER AND PLAY DEAD. OBAMA IS WRONG ON THIS- BE A PRESIDENT AND UPHOLD OUR LAWS OR YOU WILL DEFINITLY BE OUT AT THE END OF YOUR TERM. THE USA DESERVES BETTER THAN YOU.
Posted by: lowes4321 | June 22, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Even the local pinal county sherrifs office has jumped on the Immigartion bandwagon. A few weeks ago when the law was slated to be passed or vetoed a Pinal County Sherrifs Deputy made a frantic call to dispatch claiming he had come under fire by suspected illegal drug smugglers…He claimed that two individuals had emerged from the the brush with AK-47′s and opened fire on him. As it turns out in his report he claims he was off the main highway approximatly 8 miles south of Highway 8 by himself in a corridor that is supposidly a heavy drug trafficking area. A few details of his story don’t make sense…Why would a lone Sherrifs Deputy be out in that area by himself? And if the suspects opened fire with automatic weapons why was it there were no bullet holes in his car and all he sustained was a flesh wound? No suspects were ever caught and the Sherrifs department claims it’s still investigating while trying to defend the Deputy’s story. Also that rancher killed close to the Mexican border, the police are now looking north of he border for suspects not south of the border as first reported…You begining to see the big picture now???
Posted by: dontprofilemebro | June 22, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
CND FOX – The US Drug enforcement agency web site is a good place to start for the “proof” you seek regarding Mexican drug cartel activities in the US. The US Border Patrol, for the past ten years has had a dual mission: 1) stop illegal border crossings and 2) intercept and stop illegal drug trafficking. No one in their right mind argues that the drug cartels are just a myth or that they are not firmly entrenched in the US. Of course they are. Call any Sheriff department in any border state, call any congressional representative of any border state — both democrats and republicans both recognize drug trafficking and human smuggling as a huge national security issue. As for the Arizona law being bigoted — what specifically about the law is bigoted? It calls for national immigration law to be equally enforced across all ethnic groups.
Posted by: ABC watcher | June 22, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
My…oh …my…all the “emotions” being expressed on this “topic” with NO realization who was directly responsible for such a high percentage of illegal aliens. I will try one more time. It was the “wealthy corporatocracy” people…who simply wanted and got – cheap labor. So where is your disdain and criticism of them? And where is your “sense of humanity” for those who are legitimate productive citizens of our country who will be subjected to racial profiling by this bigoted, racist law? The lack of “depth” of understanding” on this issue is truly remarkable. Hey, it is simply “white minority politics” led by the “right” at its best.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
dontprofilemebro – the Pinal County Sheriff’s Department has answered all those questions. Your post is slanderous. And investigators have repeatedly said that the rancher in Arizona was shot by a drug smuggler from Mexico. You can live in denial if you’d like, but the rest of us live in the real world, where real dangers centered around drug smuggling and human trafficking exist.
Posted by: ABC watcher | June 22, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
It is amazing how out of touch these people, Owebama, AG, Eric Holder, Clinton are…the Federal Government should be filing suit against themselves for not enforcing immigration statutes. As a American average citizen, I don’t really really understand why the president of USA, Owebama apologized officially to Mexican President over the AMERICAN LOCAL LAWS, ARIZONA BILLS and why Secretary of States in USA, Clinton had to unveil our domestic law suit in foreign Country?
PLEASE THE PRESIDENT, THE AG, AND SS IN USA SHOULD STOP APOLOGIZING AND RIPPING AMERICAN’S PRIDE RIGHT NOW.
Posted by: STOP RIPPING AMERICAN'S PRIDE NOW | June 22, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
No, I don’t see the “big picture” dontprofilemebro.
Outside of you are trying to blame the victim for the crime.
“Five men suspected of smuggling drugs across the border ambushed a Pinal County sheriff’s deputy Friday in a remote area south of Phoenix, …
More than one helicopter came under fire during the evening as officers rescued Deputy Louie Puroll, who had been shot with an AK-47-type weapon around 4 p.m., according to the Sheriff’s Office.”
“The night of the killing, officers followed a single set of footprints to the U.S.-Mexico border, Dever said.”
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I am African-American and I don’t know what is wrong with Obama. I cannot support his position on immigration because it is wrong? WHen the heck is he going to fight for the American People which is what I am an American. The illegals in this country think they have rights. I say the only rights they have is to turn their tails around and leave. If we have no laws and don’t enforce them , we are worst than a third world country. Obama if you can’t get immigration right you need to go!!
Posted by: lowes4321 | June 22, 2010, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Listen I’m tired of listening to the news and hearing about obama wanting to sue the state of arizona when he has his own problem to worry about I live in Florida and I agree that Florida needs this law as well especially for the cubans and hatians
Posted by: pbear | June 22, 2010, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
“Why don’t we tear down the boarders.. let them all in.”
I have a much better idea. Arrest the illegal immigrant gang members, kidnappers, human traffickers, rapists, terrorists, and cop killers and BUS THEM to the city halls of San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Diego, Chicago, and every other city that is boycotting Arizona. Just drop them off right there in the streets in full view of the local populations. Heck, even drop them off at Pelosi’s residence. And even Holder’s. Being such caring progressives, I’m sure they’ll gladly take them in and provide them with the food and shelter they need.
Posted by: Mary | June 22, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Civil War ?
Posted by: James H | June 22, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
It’s not about what “the majority” wants as our laws are based on the constitution, not unbridled democracy. Plus, what role “majority will” plays is measured only once every two years during federal elections, the last of which gave Democrats a sweeping mandate that will correctly carry out its agenda until any future elections change the composition of government.
If the AZ law differs from federal law, than there is a constitutionally solid reason to get involved. Subsection G of AZ 1070 places misdemeanor status to illegally being in the US, above and beyond the Title 8 civil nature of illegal presence found in federal statute. Where a conflict exists between state in federal law on areas such as immigration that are explicitly federal in nature, the constitution’s Article IV Supremacy Clause holds that federal law trumps state law.
So if you’re a conservative who loves “strict constructionist” interpretation and your main concern is “the rule of law,” you’ll have no problems when the judicial branch rules against AZ’s overreaching attempt to enact Jim Crow West.
Posted by: George Jetson | June 22, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
CND FOX, I can’t speak for other states, but Arizona, voters passed the Workers Sanctions Law several years ago, aimed at hitting businesses that knowingly hire illegals with hefty penalties. That’s how we showed our disdain for the employers. How do you show your disdain for those employers who hire illegals? Of course, with identity theft rampant, it’s easy for an illegal immigrant to buy someone else’s social security number, which enables any company that hires them to avoid penalties. Whenever there is a law, there is a way around it.
Posted by: Ask not .... | June 22, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Another nail in the ole one term coffin…
Posted by: Boxcar | June 22, 2010, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
we are Americans and it seems our government is lost on what to do . it looks like we are going to have to do it ourselves. get my drift
Posted by: les | June 22, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Obama’s DOJ also wants the law that would target employers of illegal aliens in Arizona overturned, he has already asked the Supreme Court to overturn that one.
The law has been upheld all the way to through federal appeals court already.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
This site censored the link for Arizona’s legal defense fund.—Therefore, just do a Google search like this Governor Brewer + Arizona and you will find the Governor’s contact info including the mailing address.—However, you can also call Gov Brewer and ask for the link/site for making an online donation.—-Please do your part, make a donation today!!—-Gov
Brewer and Arizona are not just fighting for Arizona and its citizens—they are fighting for every state in our country and every US citizen/worker/tax payer in our country as well.
Posted by: Sue | June 22, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
This is not a border security bill… this is about being in the country illegally. Do you understand the difference? it’s is not the undocumented alien who will have their rights violated… it is the literally thousands of lawful Latinos in the state who must now carry documentation to prove citizenship every time they step outside, or face being arrested. I don’t have to do that… and neither do the blacks or the Asians… only those who may look Hispanic. Obviously, this is racial profiling, and obviously, it is a violation of their right. Show a modicum of common sense and think before you back bad legislation.
Posted by: Brad | June 22, 2010, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
I think it is funny how a lot of these people think that most of these illigals are using false ssn’s. The fact is most of them are paid cash under the table because it is less then minimum wage. They one that have fake ssn’s are paying into the system then are not able to file, so the tax money is kept by the gov.
Posted by: tejasoutlaw | June 22, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
SlappyChuckles said “Indian fill every datacenter in the US. ” Those data centers are actually IN India.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | June 22, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
“Ask not”…to your knowledge has that law ever been enforced or did the conservatives and prior administration “defund” the enforcement agency so much…that they cannot realistically enforce it? You should be able to give me a few examples. I have never seen any in the press. In any event, what you have just said is no justification for this “mean spirited” law. It was “enacted” for right wing politics purposes only.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
If anyone has read the law… or studied constitutional law at all . . . you can see that this law clearly is not discriminatory from a US Constitutional perspective. In fact, the states can do much more than what Arizona as restrictions on undocumented / illegal aliens are subject merely to Rational Basis. Which means, any “rational” purpose that a state can some up with to justify this law will suffice.
That is why Clinton said “federal government should be determining immigration policy.” The best leg the Obama administration has on finding this law unconstitutional is that it infringes on the federal governments power. But, this is basically a losing argument. Take, for example, environmental law in CA. The federal government regulates air pollution in the entire US. California regulates via much stricter laws. This is fine where the states regulate to at least the same level as the federal government. But the states, under their police power, are free to regulate further than the federal government. The same is going to happen here. That is why Clinton is not calling this law discriminatory. Obama, as a graduate of Harvard law school, and a once adjunct constitutional law professor, MUST know this fact. Any 1st year law student could figure it out with minimal effort.
The question is, why is this former law professor and lawyer wasting our time and money on this case? What do you say? Politics. He can get Hispanics to support him. Mark my words, the lawsuit will ramp up in October, right before the elections.
Posted by: Jhaplin | June 22, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
@Nero Observer, My observation is most Americans could care less if we let Mexico take over most of the South West. As long as you don’t interupt American Idol, Lost, or Survior, they would never even know it happened.
Posted by: ajax659 | June 22, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
OPEN BORDERS – North American Community, Congress, Council of Foreign Affairs, legal travel throughout the entire continent…in the next few years. Sound crazy? Look it up. Get informed.
Posted by: carina_nebi | June 22, 2010, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
The “Jimmy Carter” president speaks!!
Posted by: Bill Carson | June 22, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
@ Mary, You sound like someone I know.. Are you in Afghanistan right now?
Posted by: ajax659 | June 22, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
It is interesting to see those who support illegal immigration trying to do so by blaming it on the “wealthy corporatocracy.” This does not address the fact that most of us who oppose illegal immigration also believe the government should vigorously enforce our laws, including those against hiring illegals. That would no doubt be easier to do if we didn’t let them steal identities, and get around the I-9 form so easily.
Posted by: INTJ | June 22, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
dontprofilemebro,
Your link goes to page for local news with a bunch of headlines, none I could find mentioned hate groups.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Cnd fox, the way the workers sanctions law was written makes it difficult to enforce. It falls under the jurisdiction of each county attorney to enforce, not local law enforcement. Also, the way the law was written, a business has to “knowingly” hire an illegal immigrant. The “knowingly” is easily gotten around when an illegal uses a stolen or fraudulent social security number, so prosecution has been difficult, espcially since crime rings centered around stealing and selling social security numbers has sprung up in recent years. The law is about three years old and no one has been successfully prosecuted yet.
I might add that politics has nothing to do with this. We are a nation of laws. Everyone, without exception, is expected to follow those laws. I am a registered democrat and a legal immigrant (naturalized citizen) — but that doesn’t mean I feel anyone is above the law. Laws are in place for a reason.
But the workers sanctions law was intended to send a clear message to employers: knowingly hire illegals and risk losing your business license. It’s not the fault of the voters that crime rings and businesses found away around it.
Posted by: Ask not .... | June 22, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to file a lawsuit against the state of Arizona for its immigration law, likely next week.
————-
Good. Every now and then it becomes very clear what the difference between the parties really is. The differences are actually quite small given the full spectrum of possibilities, but those small differences do matter.
Posted by: progressive mama | June 22, 2010, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
This is one subject that I do not agree with the White House on. If there is a federal law making illegal immigration a crime, then why the heck can’t a state try to enforce it?
For the last 30 years or more every President, Repub and Dem, has ignored the real and growing problem of illegal immigration. Sure, it helps the illegals, it helps the corporations and businesses that are taking advantage of lower wages due to the influx of illegals, but it is harming lower class Americans by lowering wages (as an example a chicken processing worker made $19 hr twenty years ago, now they pay under $10 hr.) and taking jobs away from them.
And don’t anyone say that b.s. that those jobs are ones Americans don’t want to do. Who was doing them before the huge influx of illegals? How many of these jobs are less safe because employers know illegals won’t sue, thus little or no safety measures are taken?
We need to control illegal immigration. Huge fines and perhaps jail time for repeat offenders who hire illegals would be a good place to start a.s.a.p.
Posted by: Lydia | June 22, 2010, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
CND FOX asks: “where is your ‘sense of humanity’ for those who are legitimate productive citizens of our country who will be subjected to racial profiling by this bigoted, racist law?” They are being asked to carry IDENTIFICATION. I suspect all of us at some point have had to show a SS card, a driver’s license, an ID!!!! Racially profiled? Yes. I guess they won’t be bothering tall blond people who speak English. There is not a country in this world that does not feel obligated to protect its citizenry from illegal encroachment. We owe it to ourselves to do the same.
Posted by: janis | June 22, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
dontprofilemebro,
Your Aztlan support is showing with a huge glare.
Why?
#1DOUGLAS, AZ – In a heavily-redacted Cochise County Sheriff’s Office report, ABC15 has learned that people in the area told investigators they heard Rob Krentz talking to his brother over a two-way radio.
One person said Krentz asked his brother to call Border Patrol because he had come “across an illegal alien who was injured and Rob was giving assistance.”
Another woman told detectives, “Rob sounded normal on the radio and she didn’t feel he was in any distress when he was talking.”
That was the last anyone would hear from Rob Krentz.
When investigators found Krentz’s body his dog “Blue” was nearby.
The protective dog was still alive but suffering from a gunshot wound.
The report stated that family members asked authorities to euthanize him.
Both Krentz and his dog were found near an ATV that was still running.
One detective thinks the murder happened more than 1,000 feet away from where they found his body.
The detective speculated that Krentz was on the moving ATV with Blue in the back until he lost consciousness and then slumped over beside it.
Nearly entire paragraphs, detective narratives, and lists cataloging evidence collection have been blackened out by CCSO.
read full story here:
and
#2
AZTLAN? NO THANK YOU.
Posted by: Nero Observer | June 22, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Obama, Napolitano and Holder should all be sued by Arizona for dereliction of the duty to keep the border secure. I am sure the Nogales police and the family of Robert Krentz would support that.
Posted by: extremegop | June 22, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Apparently Obama and the progressives seriously want to instigate the next US civil war.
So be it.
Posted by: Todd | June 22, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
I have a much better idea. Arrest the illegal immigrant gang members, kidnappers, human traffickers, rapists, terrorists, and cop killers and BUS THEM to the city halls of San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Diego, Chicago, and every other city that is boycotting Arizona. “Mary”
=======================================
To Mary-I agree with your awesome idea 100%.
Posted by: STOP RIPPING AMERICAN'S PRIDE NOW | June 22, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Besides harshly punishing employers who hire illegals, how about giving an amnesty of a different sort. If an illegal will come forward, register as such, we will give them 2 months to get themselves organized and then grant them free travel for themselves and a small amount of personal goods, back home.
With widespread news coverage of strict laws and enforcement on those hiring illegals, the jobs will dry up for them. The illegals would need time to sell belongings and a free ride home would be the decent thing to do since the feds enabled the illegal situation for decades, both Repub and Dems.
Posted by: Lydia | June 22, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
For all of you that think AZ law is racist, you’re just out of touch or illegal, so I won’t bother commenting on that.
The Second Amendment ensures the State’s Sovereignty but the Feds just do whatever they want exempting themselves from ALL of the laws they pass on to it’s citizens.
Enough is Enough! It’s time to take America back. IDFC if your left, right, black, white… If you’re a US citizen that pays taxes, you are being taken for a ride.
THEY WORK FOR US!!!!!! NOT AGAINST US!!!!
@lowes4321, God Bless you for looking beyond race. I’m tired of being called a racist because I don’t agree with the POTUS. Who in their right mind would? Unless of course you want to see the end of the US too…..
Posted by: BruceI | June 22, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
dontprofilemebro, I was able to find the video you might have been referring to by myself.
The news said militia groups, ADL, an non-government, consider that one of the individuals involved is linked to groups the ADL considers hate groups.
ADL on the other hand doesn’t provide any evidence to justify their position.
ADL is known for calling those groups they disagree with politically as “hate groups”. They are against free speech for those who do not support their political position.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Reply to Janis…and how would you feel (no… how would you “really” feel) if the “shoe was on the other foot”? This country reminds me more and more of “South Africa” and the attempted defense of “apartheid” every day. This always occurs in “nations in decline” and people lose their sense of perspective and ability to think in big picture and educated terms.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Lydia, the free ride home as long as they are fingerprinted and other wise kept that would be needed if they ever came into the country illegally again. Along with an automatic deportation if they come in, and not being allowed back into the country for ten years.
There are other things that need to be considered, but in general, I have nothing against the free ride home.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Sandra Day O’Connor (by no means a left-winger) predicts that the Supreme Court will unanimously overturn the Arizona legislation. I believe she is correct.
Posted by: Make Some Sense Please | June 22, 2010, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
“Ask not”…I respect your answer (1:20 post) but I do believe you are being very naive when you say this has “nothing to do with politics”. It has EVERYTHING to do with politics. Its INTENT is to emotionally fire up the “base” because the Party doing it …has no solutions for the problems facing our nation. It is simple “backlash, emotional” politics.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Well said, Brad…
This is not a border security bill… this is about being in the country illegally. Do you understand the difference? it’s is not the undocumented alien who will have their rights violated… it is the literally thousands of lawful Latinos in the state who must now carry documentation to prove citizenship every time they step outside, or face being arrested. I don’t have to do that… and neither do the blacks or the Asians… only those who may look Hispanic. Obviously, this is racial profiling, and obviously, it is a violation of their right. Show a modicum of common sense and think before you back bad legislation.
Posted by: Make Some Sense Please | June 22, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Well said, George Jetson…
It’s not about what “the majority” wants as our laws are based on the constitution, not unbridled democracy. Plus, what role “majority will” plays is measured only once every two years during federal elections, the last of which gave Democrats a sweeping mandate that will correctly carry out its agenda until any future elections change the composition of government.
If the AZ law differs from federal law, than there is a constitutionally solid reason to get involved. Subsection G of AZ 1070 places misdemeanor status to illegally being in the US, above and beyond the Title 8 civil nature of illegal presence found in federal statute. Where a conflict exists between state in federal law on areas such as immigration that are explicitly federal in nature, the constitution’s Article IV Supremacy Clause holds that federal law trumps state law.
So if you’re a conservative who loves “strict constructionist” interpretation and your main concern is “the rule of law,” you’ll have no problems when the judicial branch rules against AZ’s overreaching attempt to enact Jim Crow West.
Posted by: Make Some Sense Please | June 22, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Jhaplin,
Since you studied law, have you heard of the words “exclusive jurisdiction”? The federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over foreign policy, which includes immigration. This means states cannot make immigration laws. When states and federal government have “concurrent jurisdiction,” then both states and federal government can make laws. Immigration is not one of these areas in which states and the federal government have concurrent jurisdiction. A federal judge ruled California’s Proposition 187 unconstitutional in 1997 on the basis that it infringed the federal government’s exclusive jurisdiction over matters relating to immigration, similar to the Supreme Court ruling in Plyler v. Doe (1982).
Posted by: FYI | June 22, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Now we will see a great embarrassment to this administration when the Supreme Court(if it even gets that far)kicks this back farther than a Super Bowl punter. If this law is brought down than the federal law it was copied from would then be in danger of repeal. Do not think so!
Posted by: Marc | June 22, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
I think the Sheriff could do something to keep the hate groups from going on a brown person hunting trip. He’s probably going for a kill himself…
Sheriff Paul Babeu made it clear Friday he wants an armed group of neo-Nazis to stay out of Pinal County, but acknowledged there is nothing he can do to stop them.
The sheriff was concerned with reports that the group, led by J.T. Ready of the National Socialist Movement, was planning to set up camp this weekend in the vast desert south of Phoenix to hunt for drug and human smugglers.
“Not only did we not ask for, we do not want any activity by a neo-Nazi, racist group,” Babeu said in a phone interview Friday afternoon. “This group that’s here — it really is not helpful.”
These are just a few of the lovely human beings we have to deal with in Arizona…Thank’s Jan Brewer for making Arizona the most RACIST state in the country!
Posted by: dontprofilemebro | June 22, 2010, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I think Arizona should bus all of their illegals to San Fransisco and other cities that have so called sancturary laws that forbid enforcement of illegal immigration laws. I’m sure they’d be thrilled to have them. I mean since San Francisco voted to boycott Arizona, didn’t they offer to take in all of Arizona’s illegals? Didn’t they?
Posted by: RobT | June 22, 2010, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
so the fed wants to sue? lets sue them : for the failure to act upon title 8 USC chapter 12 part 8 1321 through 1330; we the people of the United States of America do here by sue you the us gov for the… you get the point, want to read the law do a US code search, just type in the above title 8 USC, and you will see.
Posted by: bkododge | June 22, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Holder claims to be concerned about states usurping federal jurisdiction. What about the federal authorities abdicating their role in maintaining the border security? I hope the AZ lobby has a savvy lawyer. I am going to love seeing the film picked up from Buenos Aires Wildlife Area that shows paramilitary personnel armed with automatic weapons escorting a field convoy of what appears to be illegals working off their payment to coyotes by smuggling in contraband. Once that’s part of the public record, how’s the Obama administration going to come back and say they have followed through with good faith?
Posted by: Ellen K | June 22, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
What is a yellow dog Democrat to do? I understand the supremacy clause but hasn’t the US abdicated that power by not enforcing immigration law? I want to like Obama but he is making it hard, I guess he knows his supporters have nobody else to vote for. I could just sit out the next Presidential election and let the illegals vote him back in.
Posted by: cregis | June 22, 2010, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Make Some Sense Please,
You need to learn the law before you start spouting off.
Every single legal alien in the United States is required, REQUIRED to carry their immigration papers, it is FEDERAL LAW for them to do so. If you are a citizen or legal resident and are stopped by police all you have to do is show them a valid ID which 99% of Americans or legal residents have. I don’t know about you but every time I was stopped for anything by the police I was asked to show ID and in case you’re wondering I’m white. You live in LA LA land if you think the police will never ask for ID weather you are a citizen or not.
It is also mandated in the constitution that it is the Federal Governments job to secure our nation and borders and if you think letting millions of illegal aliens into our country every year is securing out nation you are seriously mistaken.
I love how liberals spout off about how we should give amnesty to all illegal aliens and let them move to our neighborhoods while they live behind gated communities where they never have to deal with all the problems that come with illegal immigration.
I don’t play over $600 a month in property taxes to pay for an illegal alien to go to the high school in MY neighborhood. I pay taxes to further the education of American Citizens period.
CMH
Posted by: CMH | June 22, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Good! I am sick and tired of all this hatred and bigotry against people who have NEVER done anything to you except come here for a better life. To Todd: No, Gov. Brewer, the voters, the Lou Dobbs’s, and the conservative pundits of America have instigated this senseless hatred. The progressives are fighting back–and may they win!
Posted by: V. A. | June 22, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I think Holder has more important things to do like enforce the Federal statues.
The majority of people that are being victimized by the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT are Hispanic American Citizens. The majority support the law.
The Feds are incompetent no matter whether Legislative or Executive branch. So tell them thanks for their input to State security but to stay in DC where they are safe from violent..oh wait DC has one of the highest violent crime rates in America…it is also ran by the same incompetent Legislature…oh my do you think there is a connection?
Posted by: Jack | June 22, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Obama has no choice than to challenge this allegedly unAmerican Arizona law.
Silly media healines read “6 in 10 majority approves of Arizona law”….Let me refresh your history memory. During WWII the vast majority of Americans approved of the forced internment of thousands of Japanese Americans. At some point in our history the “majority of Americans” approved of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow, Prohibition, Ban on Women’s Vote,
Communist Witch Hunts by McCarthy, Vietnam War,etc.etc….so what does the “6 in 10 majority” statement prove?…absolutlely nothing.
Posted by: A.Lincoln | June 22, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Yeah, why bother with the their most important functions as outlined in the US Constitution, protecting the country and setting a budget when they have much more important things to do like amassing power and control over the peons.
Posted by: Ferrari5555 | June 22, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Thank’s Jan Brewer for making Arizona the most RACIST state in the country!
Posted by: dontprofilemebro
Racist groups like the one in Arizona have always been a part of this country. Most states have a few. They are a horrible blight on the country, but they have the right to assemble and the right to free speech. Most of us see them for what they are: hateful, unnecessary and dangerous.
But pretending that these racist groups are tied to the anti-illegal immigration law, or pretending that Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration law is racist, or worse, calling the governor racist, are just ways to avoid talking about the nuts and bolts of the bill. It’s for the lazy folks who play on the emotion of the issue and believe one group of people should not be required to follow those pesky immigration laws that have been in place for decades.
Posted by: serenity now | June 22, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
ABC cutting quotes from Arizona’s ABC affiliate to keep the lid on the war in Arizona…..priceless.
Posted by: Nero Observer | June 22, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
cregis,
Obama is enforcing immigration laws. You just have not heard about it. According to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), 387,790 illegal immigrants were deported in 2009, which set a record, and ICE projected more than 400,000 will be deported in 2010.
Posted by: FYI | June 22, 2010, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Ever wonder WHY Obama has never gone to AZ?? Suppose he would be asked for LEGAL papers?? Every country you go into you MUST carry a Visa or Passport.
Being asked for your Papers of identification are not unusual. As an AZ resident, I am glad that we finally have the guts to do what is necessary, that the feds will not do for fear of losing the votes.
Posted by: AZ Resident | June 22, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
I am so sick of hollywood and all these other liberal freaks. There is only one word that matters here is called ILLEGAl. what part of that is so very hard to understand . when they say we are infriging on there rights. I’m sorry they have no rights here. NONE. and I have a solution How about we let them all stay. Here is what they need to do. ask them how long have you been here. how much have you made in the 10 years you have been here. if you can pass a back ground check and pay all back taxes for the employment you have had here. You can stay . and all back taxes will be expected immediately. no payment schedule. just like my taxes that must be paid by april 15th or the irs comes after me. why dont they go after them. its all about the money folks these people are bleeding us dry and if holly weird wants to pay for them fine by me. this contry is a disgrace and being laughed at by every other country. This president has made us so weak and PAthetic.
Posted by: KAthy | June 22, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
What about California Penal code 834b? Looks like the Arizona law to me.
Posted by: buzzardhead | June 22, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
CMH…
You mean liberals like Ronald Reagan, who granted amnesty to all illegals?
Oh and thank you for admitting in your post that immigration is exclusively the jurisdiction of the federal governmnet, as per the Constitution.
You can’t tout the Constitution when it suits you and ignore it when it doesn’t. There is no question the AZ law is unconstitutional, and pretending otherwise is just blind xenophobic hatred. One need only read some of the comments here by those who support this law to see the hated in full bloom. Sad, that.
Posted by: prettywitty | June 22, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Everybody is SO convinced this is about race. The politicians are using it as a soapbox to gather popularity while not looking under the layers to the real problem. The real problem is people coming here to take advantage of what this great country has to offer and not being willing to become LEGAL CITIZENS to reap those benefits. Those of us who are,(legal citizens) end up giving these people a free ride at our expense and then we wonder why our economy has such problems.
This is NOT ABOUT ANY PARTICULAR RACE OR ETHINIC GROUP. IT’S ABOUT ILLEGAL ALIENS OF ALL BACKGROUNDS AND NOTHING MORE.
Posted by: Tippenring1955 | June 22, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
What if officers conducted this fairly and pulled everyone over and ask for their documents? I suppose Caucasions would probably change their stance then…LOL
Posted by: dontprofilemebro | June 22, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
and btw FYI if your so for it just start paying for them all the money they take from my children. for school, daycare free lunches, free childcare, social security that they don’t pay into. the list goes on and on and on. No one is saying these are mean people they may be very nice. but they are sucking the life out of hard working people paying for them and I for one am sick and tired of it. I will purposely buy things from Arizona to support them. I;m even going to plan a trip. to spend my money there!!!!!!
Posted by: KAthy | June 22, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
To FYI:
Read the case?
Besides the in depth discussion of how states would be in their right to stop the harsh effects of illegal immigration (Id. ~ pg. 228), the court is very clear that the only reason the state lost this was becasue it had to do with “innocent” children. Otherwise the states would be well within their rights to punish illegal immigrants. In fact, the court notes specifically, that illegal immigrants are subject to the harsh penalties.
Here is a passage taken directly from the case: “[Illegal Immigrants have become a shadow underclass of citizens due to the lax application of federal immigration law. . . ] The children who are plaintiffs in these cases are special members of this underclass. Persuasive arguments support the view that a State may withhold its beneficence from those whose very presence within the United States is the product of their own unlawful conduct. These arguments do not apply 220*220 with the same force to classifications imposing disabilities on the minor children of such illegal entrants. At the least, those who elect to enter our territory by stealth and in violation of our law should be prepared to bear the consequences, including, but not limited to, deportation. But the children of those illegal entrants are not comparably situated. Their “parents have the ability to conform their conduct to societal norms,” and presumably the ability to remove themselves from the State’s jurisdiction; but the children who are plaintiffs in these cases “can affect neither their parents’ conduct nor their own status.” Plyler v. Doe, 457 US 202, 219, quoting Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U. S. 762, 770 (1977).
Note that that passage is from 1982 and is quoting part of a passage from 1972. This is well-settled law and has been for over 35 years.
Again, the Obama administration is pushing this lawsuit for one reason: politics. It has a snowballs chance in hell of even getting a preliminary injunction prohibiting its implementation. That is why it is still scheduled to come into being on the 28th of July (I think?) despite all the clamor.
Posted by: Jhaplin | June 22, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
In Texas we remember the Alamo, Goliad, Gonzales, & Battle of San Jacinto! Texan blood was the price of our freedom from the Mexican federales. Our heroes were named Houston, Travis, Crockett, & Bowie as well as Seguin & Zapata!
If you are in the US illegally, you are a criminal! GO BACK TO YOUR OWN COUNTRY NOW! SUPPORT ARIZONA!
Look, Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Presidents Obama & Calderon, AG Holder, Hillary Clinton, La Raza, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, et al. Even you have to admit we are a nation of laws, but it appears you want us to ignore the people who break these laws. In 1986, Congress passed the Immigration Reform and Control Act, or IRCA, which granted approximately 2.8 million undocumented immigrants legal status in the United States.
This act encouraged more illegal immigration. When AZ attempts to address the lawlessness, you equate it to a racist act when you know this is false. You are encouraging these criminals to stand on our streets waving their Mexican flags like they’re still in Mexico. It’s an insult to American citizens & legal immigrates. ENFORCE OUR CURRENT LAWS OR THE STATES WILL!
Support AZ! All states should pass similar laws until the federal government begins to enforce current law! It’s all about political will, not political correctness!
Posted by: TxRancher | June 22, 2010, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
America has perfectly good immigration laws and everybody knows it. The problem is they are not being enforced by the federal government. There are around 20,000,000 illegal aliens roaming America today. If the laws were being enforced, there would be no illegals here. Arizona should be applauded and supported by all patriotic Americans for trying to protect itself from the invading hordes from south of the border.
Barack Obama is, by far, the most anti-American president in our history. He is destined to be a one-term wonder.
Posted by: BattleGround51 | June 22, 2010, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
What if officers conducted this fairly and pulled everyone over and ask for their documents? I suppose Caucasions would probably change their stance then…LOL
Posted by: dontprofilemebro
I believe in most states, when a car is pulled over, the driver is always asked for their documents (drivers license, registration and insurance), regardless of race. Stop pretending that this law allows cops to pull over a car or stop someone for nothing. It has to be a legal stop (speeding, running a red, etc.). Only when the driver is unable to produce a drivers license, registration or proof of insurance only then can a cop ask “are you in the country legally?”
Only the idiots and the truly misinformed still believe that the Arizona law allows cops to pull someone over or stop them simply to ask them if they are in the country legally. It has to be a legal stop AND during the stop, there has to be reasonable suspicion, based on the person not being able to produce for example a drivers license, to inquire about their immigration status.
Posted by: Silly one | June 22, 2010, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Obama’s wrecking crew has figured out a way to use taxpayer dollars (which we don’t have, by the way) to fund yet another political campaign. Knowing full well that the AZ law is not only legal but a duplicate of the U.S. law, Obama’s “legal team” is headed to court, not to right any wrong, but to win votes among a rather large group of Hispanics who seem to support illegal immigration. Obama, et al will lose this suit just like they lost the oil drilling ban, blame the loss on a conservative court, chalk up the new votes and head off in yet another direction.
Posted by: wantingbalance | June 22, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
I’m white, and I would gladly carry any documentation the police wants. I’m all in favor of the Arizona Law.
Posted by: Zog | June 22, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
I am hispanic, live in AZ LEGALLY and totally support Jan Brewer. The Constitution gives any law enforcement offical the right to question people and ask for identification as warranted. Illegals cost AZ way more than we can afford in education, medical, and putting them in jail. AZ has also lost part of their state to drug cartels. Obama is more worried about the hispanic vote than he is about the criminals who have already taken over part of our state. Supporting illegals over US Citizens will be remembered at the next election.
Posted by: Juanita | June 22, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
BYE, BYE AMERICAN PIE!
Here is the Attorney General of the United States, Mr. Holder, attacking the people of Arizona for daring to replicate a federal law (passed in 1952) requiring non-Americans to present immigration cards for identification.
Since the U.S. Government has NOT imposed the law that IT is required BY LAW to impose, and is now demanding that the people of Arizona also NOT impose, there is only ONE solution to all of this.
OPEN ALL THE BORDERS.
Let’s let everyone INTO this nation while the rest of us just sit back; don’t go to work; don’t pay taxes; etc. and see what Mr. Holder and Mr. Obama do then.
Just HOW many Illegal Aliens have put a man on the moon from their countries? Will they have the educations and skills to then make ANY major contributions to this nation IF we simply stand back?
Just HOW will THEY raise the standard of living here by being here illegally? They are LOWERING the standard of living for every lawful American citizen while Obama/Holder have sided with the Illegal Aliens!
THAT is the outcome of what this Administration is requiring. The U.S. Government has stolen American jobs from Americans and sent them to China; and is now demanding that American citizens are SECOND CLASS citizens and have NO right to protections FROM illegal aliens.
Does the government in Washington, D.C. NOT read the polls? Americans HATE the federal government now.
Does the government think that IF someone should BOMB Washington, D.C., 9-11-style, that the American people would have any sadness for the passing of those in D.C. given what those same people are doing to this nation’s people? No.
It IS that bad across America now.
Every night in this western community, there are stabbings, and fatal shootings BY illegal aliens against Americans AND against fellow illegal aliens. Who pays for all of that? We do.
And, Holder and Obama think that THIS is what America is supposed to be?
They need to go back to where they originated and leave the rest of honest citizens alone.
Obama in 2008 is now “NObama” for 2012.
Posted by: gglenc | June 22, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
We need to stop wasting money in the Middle East and shore up the borders. Think of it, 10 billion a month during the Bush years, we could have built a moat around this country. I personally feel anyone crossing the border illegally should be shot with a tranquilizer gun, then they should be taken and released to some far and remote place in Mexico. People smuggling illegals in, be it for farming or the sex trade should face the death penalty. It’s time to stop this nonsense. Other countries will never improve because their people come here, and they send money that should be circulated in the US economy to places like Mexico!
Posted by: Hege1321 | June 22, 2010, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
You xenophobes are either missing the point or ignoring it…immigration enforcement is exclusively the jurisdiction of the federal government, period.
And to all of you who claim Obama is “un-American” for his stance on this issue, you must all also agree that Ronald Reagan was by far the most “un-American” President of all time for granting amnesty to all illegals.
Funny, you never hear them disavow Reagan for that…gee, I wonder why. *rme*
Posted by: prettywitty | June 22, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Given that 60% favor the Arizona action, maybe this blunder will neutralize the damage from the Tea Party scaring away moderate Republicans (me) and independents.
Posted by: Jay Ramsey | June 22, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
The AZ law dose nothing to set or change US immigration law all it dose is enforce current law but with more restraints on the police then the federal law has . In the AZ law you must already have a done an action that broke a law to have contact with the police but under federal law they can stop you just for how you look or act and nothing more. Also under federal law a state has the right to enforce laws that the federal government has grossly refused to enforce for there own safety such as this one were the feds have refused to enforce federal immigration laws and in doing so have left the states saddled with extreme debit, crime, cost and other problems from the lack of federal enforcement. I know that any time I have been stop by the cops be it driving or walking I have been ask for my papers or ID so why should that be okay for me but not for an Illegal immigrant? And what part of breaking a law is a crime do you not understand? You came here illegally that is breaking our law and so you’re a criminal period! If you came here just to have your child born here you have no real connection to this country and your child then should not have any citizenship rights because of that. I believe that unless one or both parents are a citizen then and only then should a child born here become a citizen just like it is with the majority of all countries in the world! if you do not like that then may be we should just use Mexico’s immigration laws as our own and fallow them to the letter of the law and show people what real hard core anti immigration laws really are!
Posted by: MG | June 22, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
I’m a White American and I am proud of what the Obama Administration had done. We are a country of immigrants, and should set an example to the world that discrimination had no place in America.
Posted by: George | June 22, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
To CND FOX: Talk to other first generation immigrant friends — people from Greece, Albania, India — people who waited years and years to come here legally. People whose relatives paid thousands and thousands of dollars to guarantee they would be able to pay for themselves when they got here. What are they — stupid??!
Posted by: janis | June 22, 2010, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Prettywitty:
See my last post and the specific language from 2 different Supreme Court’s where the composition was more liberal than it is today. BOTH prior courts said the STATES can in fact implement HARSH penalties including, but not limited to deportation. The AZ law does not even amount to automatic deportation.
Moreover, the court is way more conservative today. Likely it would not have found for Plyer v. Doe as it is, let alone overturn the AZ law. You are barking up the wrong tree.
Posted by: Jhaplin | June 22, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
It’s time for Big Brother to register and provide verifiable documentation to all current U.S. citizens.. welcome to the new normal.
Posted by: Dontget818 | June 22, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
George
immigrants and illegal immigrants are two totally different groups, i suggest you learn the difference and stop bluring the lines between the two
Posted by: plopsdad | June 22, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
good job DOJ(Department of Jacka$$es), you are goiong against 76% of Americans feelings….you can be replaced as well
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | June 22, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I will repeat…this has NOTHING to do with “being in the country illegally”. Otherwise we would have “countless examples” of employers being prosecuted or all ready in jail or out of business for illegally employing these people. This is NOTHING MORE than “race baiting white minority politics” at its worst – to fire up the “base” of the Party that is constantly losing the enlightened, educated moderate vote. And please…all you like minded moderates pay attention. We cannot and must not let our nation slip “backwards” in 2010 or 2012. Conservatives and extremists have created this mess and the DESERVE to become a shrill minority.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Just another example of the failed Obama administration. The Federal government no longer serves in the interests of its citizens. The current regime is a disgrace. Who is going to sue them for failing to enforce the law? Obviously the un-Justice department is incapable of doing anything worthwhile.
Posted by: DadR | June 22, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
the bleeding hearts only represent 17% of Americans….gooood luck convincing the remaining 76% of us….you nad the ILEGALS LOSE TOO BAD SO SAD
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | June 22, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
For those interested in the truth…
Violent crime is lower in AZ now than it has been since the early 70′s, and property crime rates are at the lowest they’ve been since the 60′s.
The claim that this law is necessary because of the out of control violence that illegal immigration brings with it is just unsubstantiated fear mongering.
And if any of you obvious Obama haters are at all interested in the truth, you can use “the Google” to see how much MORE money and resources the Obama Administration has devoted to border control than did the Bush Administration.
So again…why the sudden outcry now, under an Administration that is doing more for border security than its predecessor? What is dofferent about Obama, aside from his doing more to protect the border?
Gee, what ever could it be? *rme*
Posted by: prettywitty | June 22, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
I will present my status to any officer…….no big deal unless you are illegal WAAAAAAAAAH!
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | June 22, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
prettywitty | – Amnesty and the Arizona illegal immigration law are two separate issues. And Reagan did not grant amnesty to ALL illegals. Under both Reagan and Clinton, those seeking amnesty were required to come forward, file an application (which needed approval). They also had to submit to fingerprinting and a background check. Immigrants with a criminal background either in the US or Mexico were NOT granted amnesty. These are the rules that are applied to anyone who applies for legal residency in the US.
The criticism under Clinton was that the process was rushed and too many ineligible immigrants were granted amnesty. Under Reagan, there was no rush, so ineligible immigrants were later deported.
Border Patrol routinely captures known criminals, drug traffickers and human smugglers who maintain a residence in the US. These folks, just like under Clinton and Reagan, are not expected to come forward because if they do, they will be automatically deported.
Pretending that all illegals will come out of hiding if they are offered amnesty is foolish. The criminal elements have no reason to come out of hiding.
Posted by: Enterprise | June 22, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
1 and out and then returns America’s clout
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | June 22, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Dad R…
Why weren’t you screaming about this when Bush was POTUS and did way less to protect the border than this administration has done?
You don’t have to answer…I know why.
Posted by: prettywitty | June 22, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
“And to all of you who claim Obama is “un-American” for his stance on this issue, you must all also agree that Ronald Reagan was by far the most “un-American” President of all time for granting amnesty to all illegals.
Funny, you never hear them disavow Reagan for that…gee, I wonder why. *rme*
Posted by: prettywitty | Jun 22, 2010 2:52:29 PM”______Reagan was the worst president EVER! I am Liberal but I don’t tow the party line when they are wrong! Conservatives love the cheap labor and liberals love the underdog, but it’s wrong! It’s not just wrong for this country it’s wrong for the illegals!
Posted by: Hege1321 | June 22, 2010, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Prettywitty:
When you cant win on the law, you should always attack the other side. Motto #1 when losing a case.
Motto #2: When you can’t win on the law and can’t get people to come to your side picking on the other side, plead public policy.
I wonder what will come next…
Posted by: Jhaplin | June 22, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Affirmative action is enforced in a way that causes discrimination based on race so tough luck for Mr. Holder.
Posted by: HoustonRocks | June 22, 2010, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
For all the open border advocates, those of you who aren’t currently living in a state invaded by illegal aliens to the extent the taxes to support them are breaking your back, you’ll be happy about this.
The Attorney General of Mexico is also filing lawsuit against Az. Take a good long look. The Attorneys General from Mexico and the U.S. joining forces.
Have any doubt this country belongs to the citizens of the U.S. any longer ? It doesn’t.
There’s also a rumor being floated around in Washington, maybe from the administration to test the waters, that Obama just might issue an executive order and grant amnesty regardless of the damage it will do, ignoring the majority of this country and leaving it up to taxpayers in the most impacted area with the debts.
Welcome to Mexico, folks.
Posted by: TGood | June 22, 2010, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
: prettywitty |
By the way, crime is not the only reason for wanting to keep illegal immigrants out of the US. We have laws regarding who can come into the US, and we have Border patrol, customs etc., so we know who is coming in. Every country in the world, including Mexico, does this. Every country in the world sets up requirements for entry and expects that people visiting or moving to their country adhere to those rules.
As an American, for example, you can’t move to Mexico, buy land and take a job from a Mexican citizen. Our rules here are similar and are designed to ensure that American jobs go to American workers first. If American employers can’t fill these jobs with American workers, there are legal worker visas they can apply for to hire foreign workers.
No other country in the world has one set of laws for people immigrating from Africa or Haiti, for example, and another set of rules for people immigrating from Mexico, for example. In most parts of the world, it would be seen as racist to tell the immigrant from Haiti to come to the country legally, but allow the Mexican immigrant to come in free and clear, without so much as a stop at Customs. But here in America, this is exactly what folks like you are fighting for – inequality and racially-applied immigration law.
Posted by: Enterprise | June 22, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Mexico has asked Arizona’s court to strike down Arizona’s law.
Arizona has an interest in protecting its citizens too, Mexico does not seem to recognize that right though.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Unemployment 10 percent. Underemployment 17% to 20 percent. Jails full, hospitals with a stack of unpaid bills, food stamp usage surging, schools failing. Why wouldn’t we want more law breaking, poorly educated people in the country…driving down wages? Makes sense to me…just like subsidizing people to buy SUVs or prop up the housing market.
Posted by: Get Real | June 22, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
So, I heard on the radio that the Obama is going to give illegals amnesty by signing an executive order. Will that be signed just in time for elections? No wonder the President doesn’t want to protect our borders. The drug lords must love this guy. I guess it’s about time someone takes a stand.
Posted by: grams09 | June 22, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
TGood
I heard it, but dont beleive it.Think mass roit if he did, he would be out of office before the ink was dry, and thats the last thing he wants.
Posted by: plopsdad | June 22, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Jhaplin…
The law is on my side, for the aforementioned reason and for the fact that racial profiling and discriminatory laws are unconstitutional. Though I do agree…this uber-Conservative Court is worrisome; but I’d like to think the travesty that is this law is a bridge too far for even them.
FYI…I am no lefty lib. I am center-left at most, and would probably agree with moderate Republicans on some things (like the 2nd Amendment)if there were any moderate Republicans left with whom to agree.
And I disagree that calling a spade a spade is an unjust attack used as a distraction. That’s just sticking your head in the sand, something I won’t do.
Posted by: prettywitty | June 22, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
prettywitty – What does VIOLENT crime have to do with it? Anyone who is here illegally is a CRIMINAL period.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | June 22, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
The first thing AZ should do is VERIFY that the head of the Justice Department is legally appointed to prosecute AZ. DEMAND to see the BIRTH CERTIFICATE!!!!
Posted by: Wheresthebirthcert | June 22, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
America has a right to decide who can and cannot enter the country. Liberals are so consumed with equity that they think every person that they view as a victim has a right to come to America.
Posted by: Hank Gonzalez | June 22, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
I am retired US Navy and have served this country hoorably for 22 years. I am sickened and saddened to see what is happening to our once great nation. Our government is turning a blind eye to the disastrous effects of illegal immigration. Not only do they (Democrat and Republican) refuse to enforce the illegal immigration laws that have been on the books for years. It seems that they want “open” borders so that anyone can come here illegaly. We cannot just selectively enforce the laws we like and ignore the one’s we don’t. That is a huge disservice to the American people and should stop NOW. We should send a message to those politicians, both Democrat and Republican that this is not acceptable and send THEM to the unemployment line in November.
Posted by: Go Arizona | June 22, 2010, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Reply to Janis’ 2:58…and are we comparing an “apple with an apple” with that comparison. It seems to me that 1) the population and numbers were far smaller and more easily manageable and 2) the wealthy corporatocracy” that exists today was not quite sio powerful back then. Janis the past is the PAST. We need to deal with today’s problems with positive solutions, not ngative, racist, biased laws like this one. Where were you (us) when all the greedy employers lured them here for cheap labor? Your “stance” might be alot more plausible if we would have stood up to those greedy monsters back then. Instead we take it out on the weak and the powerless. The law is a “race baiting” emotional ploy that Republicans constantly use.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Just another example of the failed Obama administration. The Federal government no longer serves in the interests of its citizens. The current regime is a disgrace. Who is going to sue them for failing to enforce the law? Obviously the un-Justice department is incapable of doing anything worthwhile. posted by DADR I guess the same could be said of the bush administration since our borders where protected during his regime. I don’t suffer from selective memory as people on the right do as I remember it no President in the past ever stopped the flow of illegals comming into this country. Now that Obama is in office you want other to believe that he is the only one who is not trying to stop it. Its sad so many people are so blind that they really believe another party is going to do different. When election time comes they all will change their tune for votes.
Posted by: achillies | June 22, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Next Obama will be sending stimulus money to the cartels…..Or has he already?
Posted by: Mary Elen Burke | June 22, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
IMPEACH the TRAITOR
Posted by: Mary Elen Burke | June 22, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Arizona should sue the Federal Government for lack of enforcement of federal law on immigration policy.
Posted by: johnraccoon | June 22, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
CND FOX: Can you cite a clause or two from the Arizona law that highlights it as “racist” or “race baiting”? I thought the same thing until I read the law … maybe you caught something I didn’t. The bill clearly states how and when officers can ask about immigration status, and clearly says that the suspect’s actions, not race or national origin, are to be used to determine “reasonable suspicion.” Even if there is reasonable suspicion, local law enforcement can’t do anything but call in federal immigration authorities who will make the final determination and take whatever action is necessary. I’m not sure what part of that is the racist part.
Posted by: c'est moi | June 22, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Here’s the problem with the law from the perspective of a Hispanic living in Arizona.
First of all, it’s true that the law states that the officer must have ”reasonable suspition”in order to request documentation.
Basically this is what amounts too the ”Honor System”for police officers. It never works out well for the target…
Does everyone think that these officers are perfect, that none of them have racial bias? That they will all practice restraint and follow the letter of the law? I really doubt it… It’s going to happen. Innocent people are going to be harrassed,their civil rights trampled on. They’ll be imprisoned, seperated from their children, and their property searched. And after all that you’ll be released with a good ol pat on the back…Thank you brown citizen!
Another piece of the legislation that is rarely mentioned allows Police to enter your property to ask for documentation for minor calls such as a loud party, overgrow weeds, cluttered yards etc…I’m sure they will take the oppertunity to look for other violations while they’re there-You know-wink,wink…
Last but not least it is now illegal to give an undocumented person a ride in your vehicle…Will Ambulances, Taxis, Buses or any other form of public transportation refuse to serve Hispanics for fear of violating the law??Probably…Will you be discriminated against in the workplace?? Most likely…How can they tell us from them? Is there some sort of PROFILE?
I realize these issues probably don’t cross the minds of caucasions because Well, it’s highly unlikely they will be harrassing blond haired blue eyed PEOPLE!
Posted by: dontprofilemebro | June 22, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Obama’s ultimate goal is to push the U.S. into third-world status. This is just another step in that direction.
Posted by: Ed | June 22, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
CND FOX: “This is NOTHING MORE than “race baiting white minority politics” at its worst – to fire up the “base” of the Party that is constantly losing the enlightened, educated moderate vote.”
Hey genius, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda terrorists are also coming across the border with the help of Mexican mules. Wake up.
Posted by: Mary | June 22, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
“(10) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require an agreement under this subsection in order for any officer or employee of a State or political subdivision of a State—
(A) to communicate with the Attorney General regarding the immigration status of any individual, including reporting knowledge that a particular alien is not lawfully present in the United States; or
(B) otherwise to cooperate with the Attorney General in the identification, apprehension, detention, or removal of aliens not lawfully present in the United States.”
This is from Federal immigration law, and as it states, Arizona and other officers have every right to verify immigration status.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
MaryEllen…
Of course I can read…just like I can read the crime stats that PROVE that violent crime and property rates are lower now in AZ than they’ve been for decades, in almost half a century.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your hatred…it is clearly what sustains you.
Posted by: prettywitty | June 22, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
“Mary Ellen Burke”…let me “help” you out by suggesting something positive. Why don’t you try another “News source” than “Faux News” for your “facts”. Your lack of “worldly awareness” is clearly lacking. Republicans are USING people like you…but the majority of us in this nation just do not think “your way” anymore. I hope the censors lets this post. I tried very hard to be kind.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
As an Obama volunteer, I am deeply dismayed to read about this. If Obama really does this without addressing the federal government’s poor record in supporting border security, then unfortunately I will have no choice but to vote him out of office.
I urge the administration to reconsider, as I know many Obama voters who agree with me on this and who are watching this decision carefully.
Posted by: jh | June 22, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
If you are still not convinced that the Arizona law is correct, then go to LA and visit some schools there. It’s total chaos, no one is realy learning anything and gangs have just about taken over the city. Arizona is just trying to prevent their state from becoming like LA and other cities in California. Voters need to wake up and go to the polls enmasse in November to vote out all these fools wh refuse to enforce our immigration laws.
Posted by: Go Arizona | June 22, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Maybe the Federal Government should do it’s job and put Arizona in it’s place!!
Posted by: dontprofilemebro | June 22, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
dontprofilemebro – considering that the Arizona law warns officers that they are on their own financially if the department is sued due to their racial profiling, yes, I think they will be extremely careful. The officer will have to pay his own legal defense fi he profiles. That’s good incentive not to profile. Are officers Perfect? No. But the worst that will happen under this law is that an officer might will pull over an unlicensed, uninsured, driver with no registration and no identification and ask that person (because he has no identification), “are you in the country legally?” The person will probably respond, “yes, I have a student visa in my wallet which I left in my dorm room.” Officer will run the name through a data base, much the way a drivers license is checked for felonies and warrants, the if the driver is telling the truth, he/she will be sent on their way.
Whether the officer has reasonable suspicion to run the driver’s name is gained through the driver’s actions, not his race.
Posted by: c'est moi | June 22, 2010, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
“Obama’s ultimate goal is to push the U.S. into third-world status. This is just another step in that direction.”
Are you people kidding me with this absurdity? No wonder there can never be rational conversation anymore, sheesh.
Posted by: prettywitty | June 22, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Hey Mary, why don’t you show us some evidence that Hezbollah and Al Qaeda terrorists are coming through Mexico?
Or is this something else you were force fed through FAUX NEWS…
Posted by: dontprofilemebro | June 22, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Maybe we should invade Mexico and move the border 100 miles to the south. Then we could develop it properly and Mexicans could live in what was Mexico and have jobs. I know that’s a bit of a wild idea, but Mexico is doing much for its people.
Posted by: Frank | June 22, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
@jh Stop bashing Fox news! Not sure what planet you are on,but Obama is nothing but bad news. The majority of people,if you read the polls disagree with Obama. obama is pushing the usa into nothing. I am going to be happy to push him out of the white house doors!!
Posted by: jenny | June 22, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“Hey Mary, why don’t you show us some evidence that Hezbollah and Al Qaeda terrorists are coming through Mexico?”
From the Washington Times, March 27, 2009:
“Hezbollah is using the same southern narcotics routes that Mexican drug kingpins do to smuggle drugs and people into the United States, reaping money to finance its operations and threatening U.S. national security, current and former U.S. law enforcement, defense and counterterrorism officials say.
The Iran-backed Lebanese group has long been involved in narcotics and human trafficking in South America’s tri-border region of Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil. Increasingly, however, it is relying on Mexican narcotics syndicates that control access to transit routes into the U.S.
Hezbollah relies on “the same criminal weapons smugglers, document traffickers and transportation experts as the drug cartels,” said Michael Braun, who just retired as assistant administrator and chief of operations at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).
“They work together,” said Mr. Braun. “They rely on the same shadow facilitators. One way or another, they are all connected.
“They’ll leverage those relationships to their benefit, to smuggle contraband and humans into the U.S.; in fact, they already are [smuggling].”
His comments were confirmed by six U.S. officials, including law enforcement, defense and counterterrorism specialists. They spoke on the condition that they not be named because of the sensitivity of the topic.”
Like I said…wake up.
Posted by: Mary | June 22, 2010, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Mary, you are fighting a losing battle. If people wanted to know the truth, there are a number of good credible resources, like the US Drug Enforcement Agency, Customs and Border Enforcement, etc. Not to mention that these folks can pick up a phone and call their congressional representative and ask these questions. They chose not to do this because they don’t want to know the truth. It’s easier for them to call people racist and stupid.
Posted by: Irony | June 22, 2010, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
IMPEACH the TRAITOR Posted By MARY Elen Burke Then they should’ve impeached every President before that that didn’t secure the borders. Sorry but we can’t be selective if we do it to one, we should’ve done it to them all. We didn’t just wake up one day and this was all out of control, its been happening a lot longer than Obama has been around. I am against illegal immigration but if you are under the delusion that voting in a different President will fix this mess I would love to live in your dream world.
Posted by: achillies | June 22, 2010, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
“JENNY” (your 3:50 post) WE ARE NOT “bashing” “Faux News”…we don’t have to. They do such a “great job” of making themselves look “non-credible”. It is “right wing punditry” Jenny…nothing more…nothing less. And its only intent is to “fire up” the Republican right wing. But the neat thing is, that it is also causing that Party to “implode”. So I hope they keep up their “good work”.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
The law is not on your side, at all. Take Constitutional Law 101. There is no protection for illegal immigrants in the constitution. See, e.g., Grutter v. Bollinger, Plyer v. Doe, all the way back to Caroline Products in 1935 etc. etc. Absolutly no protection for illegal immigrants. Laws regulating illegal immigrants get, at best, rational basis scrutiny. In the last 30 years, the court has only struck down 1 case involving ration basis scrutiny.
That means, even if you get from the fact that the law is not facially discriminatory, and you prove that the law is in effect discriminatory, there is no protection afforded by the constitution for illegal immigrants.
No protection = no ILLEGAL discrimination under the law.
In fact, read the ONLY case giving any rights to any illegal immigrant is Plyer v. Doe. And read the passage I took directly from the courts statement in that case. There is no protection for those who choose to enter the US illegally. Even in Dicta, the court clearly stated the States can go as far as to automatically deport.
On to your supremacy clause case…
Moreover, there is the whole concept of concurrent enforcement discussed supra whereby the court clearly, and unambiguously explains that the states can in fact go above and beyond the federal regulations under their police power. But the AZ law does not do this… instead it does less. The AZ law merely enforces the current Fed laws.
Where did you go to law school? Anywhere? Or are you just spouting off what people tell you on blogs?
Again, I bet you will see the case in front and center around October. And the loss from the Supreme Court, as even all the law professor blogs are predicting, will come right after the elections in November. Why? Get all the Hispanic voters to rally behind the Democrats.
It is great politics. Politics 101. Do what you can to get people to vote for you and then worry about the consequences later. SOund familiar? Ohhh wait… isn’t that what the democrats did with the Health Care Debate?
Posted by: Jhaplin | June 22, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Jhaplin,
I never said that states cannot help the federal government enforce federal immigration laws. In fact, that is what the federal government is doing already, without the Arizona law. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, reported that it deported 387,790 illegal immigrants in 2009, which set the all-time record. It is projecting that it will deport 400,000 in 2010. My point is that states cannot make their own immigration laws.
Make Some Sense Please, you said that Sandra Day O’Connor, former Supreme Court justice, predicts that the Supreme Court will unanimously overturn the Arizona legislation. Can you give me the link please? All I can find is that Justice O’Connor said that the law may have gone a little too far, that immigration is the province of the federal rather than state government. She was also worried about racial profiling.
Posted by: FYI | June 22, 2010, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I just love it when you CND FOX accuse the republicans what the democrats have been doing for years.
Posted by: Lizzie | June 22, 2010, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Mr. Obama, this is a simple question. Did you not promise Ms. Brewer you would contact her within two weeks of her meeting with you? Did you contact her as you said you would? No? Well then you Sir are a liar. This is the same arrogance we are experiencing as citizens. You cannot be counted on and your integrity is shot to h*ll. I can’t believe you felt you could get away without this communication? Only children act like this.
You may have forgotten or you may have wanted to make a statement that you take direction from no one. Either way, YOU’RE OUT!
I never thought I’d see an American President Attack one of our own States after that State had requested Federal assistance pursuant to Federal Law.
Posted by: Kathleen | June 22, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
So if the Federal Government is derelict in it’s duties, the States must endure it?
There’s no reasonable measure by which the federal government can assert that it is enforcing immigration laws.
In the absence of enforcement, States and municipalities will fill in the void. It’s the president’s job to enforce the law, if refuses to do so, impeachment is the only answer. It’s treasonous to allow another nation’s citizens despoil and pillage our nation’s generosity and graciousness. Thousands of our citizens are killed by foreign citizens each year. Millions have their tax dollars stolen. When will we decide to put and end to this madness???
Posted by: don | June 22, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
I always carry my identification around with me (Drivers license, insurance etc) In fact, you are required by law to do so. If I was told that I needed to carry other forms of ID to stop illegal immigration, I would gladly do so. Incidentally, illegal immigration comes not just from South of the border but from all over the world. I applaud those immigrants who waited in line, filled out forms and came to our country LEGALLY and earned their citizenship. Those who come here illegally, should be sent back home and be told to do it the right way next time. If the federal government refuses to enforce our immigration laws, then there should be a constitutional amendment that allows each State to do so.
Posted by: Go Arizona | June 22, 2010, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“oh Lizzie” … this far different than what you are “referring” to. You see I am a “moderate” who left the “Party” in ’08 because of its “composition” and where it was headed (right down the toilet). You see I am one of the many moderates who “opened their eyes” to what the republican Party did by “pandering” to the “religiopus right” and the “far right conservatives”. And you know what? Sometimes the only way to get their attention …is to leave. The problem is that their philosophy is too old school traditionalist.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 22, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
FYI,
The Federal immigration law specifically allows states and local governments to make their own immigration laws.
States cannot regulate immigration, that only means that a state cannot decide who can enter the country or who can stay. Arizona law does neither.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Arizona’s law is RACIST pure and simple. You can slice it and dice it anyway you want, the way it is written and also supported by others, it’s pretty obvious that is is RACISTS.
If it was truly an issue of jobs going to others that other Americans, we would be putting in jail all those businesses that are hiring illegals. THESE BUSINESSES ARE BREAKING THE LAW!
These business owners should go to jail as well if they want to follow the law. But they don’t because the so-called law is RACIST and aimed at people of color.
I doubt very highly that you will see WHITE immigrants arrested for being here illegally.
And you won’t see those businesses who break the law in jail, either.
Even more proof that this law is RACIST.
Posted by: FunMe | June 22, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
I guarantee you that if the federal government was required to reimburse each state and municipality for the cost of illegal immigration, all of this nonsense would cease immediatly and there would be no need for debate. The state of California is bankrupt, the schools are failing and state employees are being laid of or their hours are being cut back. As California goes, so does the rest of the USA. Is Obama blind or does he just not care? I firmly believe that we will have a new administration in 2012 with a brand new DOJ. Hopefully the new one will do better or at least attempt to do better than this one. If not, it’s 410 AD all over again and the Visgoths are at the gates!
Posted by: Go Arizona | June 22, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
It’s ironic that those who call the Arizona anti immigration law “racist” are actually advocating for an immigration policy that gives preference to one race of people.
Those people who are calling the law “racist” can’t point to one clause in the bill that is racist. In fact, the law is specifically written to do as much as possible to avoid racial profiling — but that’s not enough for those who are opposed to the law. They want Mexican immigrants have preferential treatment and believe that this one group of people should be above all laws.
Posted by: Solutions | June 22, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
“Holder is expected to also claim in his suit that the Arizona law will be enforced in a way that could cause discrimination based on race and nationality.”
As I recall, that suggestion was brought up in the 9th circuit federal appeals case of the Arizona law against employers of illegal aliens and the court said that the law could only be challenged on the as written basis. The law withstood the challenge and Holder has now asked the Supreme Court to strike down the law.
The Supreme Court decision should be this month on that case.
Posted by: win | June 22, 2010, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
President Obama: Do you hear the citizens speaking? YOU are a servant of the people and are to represent the will of the people. You trampled on our freedoms once when you pushed health care through without our vote, now is it surprising that citizens in states like Arizona and Nebraska are taking matters into their own hands to insure their will is heard on the issue of illegal immigration? Speaking of illegal immigration, why should immigrants from Mexico be allowed to circumvent the system, entering our country illegally and then reaping the benefits our country has to offer (money out of our pockets, by the way) when immigrants from other countries are by and large required to go through legal channels? Do I hear the cry of racial discrimination raised in this instance? I didn’t think so. I have compassion for the plight of many illegal immigrants, but help can be offered on their side of the border through aid organizations, charities, reform in their gov’t/society, not through turning a blind eye when they commit the crime of illegally entering our country. And lets not forget that many illegal immigrants are hardened criminals who commit crimes in our country against our citizens. We have immigration laws for a reason, correct? The title of citizen still offers special privileges, doesn’t it…I’m not sure how to answer that anymore. And to those who worry that enforcing our immigration laws will lead to racial disrimination…stop making excuses and look at the big picture! Just because a law can be abused should we therefore ignore or obliterate the law…no! That makes no rational sense. Can we establish safeguards to try to prevent such abuse…absolutely (and a more reasonable choice). So, here’s my plea to my President: Represent YOUR country’s best interests and the welfare of ITS citizens.
Posted by: UrbanFarmer10 | June 22, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Well, the drug cartels have now setup observation posts in the hills in the US so they can track the movement of US law enforcement. Obama is an idiot…a political hack and digusting incompetent content to let people die as he plays politics.
Posted by: buffetking | June 22, 2010, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
“Those people who are calling the law “racist” can’t point to one clause in the bill that is racist. In fact, the law is specifically written to do as much as possible to avoid racial profiling — but that’s not enough for those who are opposed to the law. They want Mexican immigrants have preferential treatment and believe that this one group of people should be above all laws.”
If an illegal alien was driving drunk and ended up killing one of their family members, maybe they’d finally figure things out.
Posted by: Mary | June 22, 2010, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Since when did we start allowing another country to start dictating to the US what our immigration policy should be? This is crazy. It is time for some REAL change in Washington DC. Let’s throw all the bums out!
Posted by: Go Arizona | June 22, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Until one of you left-leaning hippies actually provide those of us who are for enforcement of laws with parts of the law that are vehemently “racist,” please just be quiet. Most of you sound uneducated and silly. This bill was crafted and re-crafted just so it wouldn’t have constitutional consequences. Furthermore, it’s really quite dense to refer to Fox News as ‘Faux News’ especially since most of you probably would never be able to name a single time they literally gave out wrong news without correcting it soon after. It’s not the most watched news channel of all cable channels because they’re unreliable and incorrect. C’mon, get real people. Perhaps you should stop watching MSLSD ;]
Posted by: Ksanc | June 22, 2010, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Those who continue to insist that it’s only the republicans who see a need for strong border security, or those who believe that the republicans are lying about violence on the border, please call Representive Ann Kirkpatrick of Arizona – a democrat who is on the House Committee on Homeland Security – at her Washington office. You’ll hear from a trusted democrat what is really going on on the border. She’ll tell you why she is one of the many members of Congress (in both parties) who has been demanding that Washington do more to protect the border.
Enough of this blaming the republicans. Protecting the border and stopping the evils of human trafficking and drug smuggling is not about politics – it’s about doing what’s right.
Posted by: in box | June 22, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, a democrat, said this today: “The federal government needs to make a much larger commitment of manpower and technology to effectively crack down on the cartels and keep us safe. If Washington is truly serious about permanently strengthening our security, it must go beyond this request. I have introduced legislation calling for 3,500 new USBP agents to be hired, trained and deployed at the U.S.-Mexican border by the end of next year. Including that measure in the upcoming supplemental would make a real difference in stopping the threats we face. I strongly encourage the President and Congressional leadership to end the decades of neglect and put my plan into action.”
You see, it is not just the republicans who recognize the very real threat on the Mexican border.
Posted by: in box | June 22, 2010, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
If some of you ever saw what happened to some of the young girls brought across the border and forced to work in prostituion to pay their way across, You would stop your whining about someone asking for your ID when you are pulled over or stopped for a violation.
Posted by: ajax659 | June 22, 2010, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
I am wondering how insistent the Obama administration will be on the two recent issues, i.e. stop the offshore drilling and sue the AZ government on its immigration law, both of which are unpopular in public opinion poll. Previously, we saw AG Holder first ordered the civil trial of 9/11 related terrorists in N.Y. and then retrieved because of serious objection by the New Yorkers. On the energy policies, although the Dem. environments wanted to devote wholly on renewable energies and stay away from nuclear power and deep sea drilling, Obama had to include both as items of nation’s need in his state of union address under the pressure of public opinion. Last November, when the Ft. Hood shooting incident occurred, Obama government first refused to recognize it as a terrorist act, but two months later, the WH made formal statement that the Ft Hood incident is a terrorist act.
Posted by: austin | June 22, 2010, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
I have all ways wondered.. Why is it only the Federal Gvt Const. Responsibility to regulate Immigration WHEN for an Immigrant to come into the USA, they Have to Come into a STATE. Well, unless it is D.C. That is it.. Let’s DUMP ALL THE illegals into D.C.
Posted by: ajax659 | June 22, 2010, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
FunMe – Arizona’s law is not racist. It is simply against criminals who are here illegally and those that transport them. Have you READ the law? I have. Over 3/4 of it deals with people who transport criminal aliens. Only a few paragraphs actually deals with the criminal aliens themselves. And it explicitly prohibits profiling.
Posted by: honestly | June 22, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Maby we should file a law suite for all the goverment people who let the 12 million people or more come into the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA knowing that it was not legal and there are federal laws which are very much like the Arizona law. So much for Obamas said he would do for us, VOTE THEM OUT IN NOVEMBER AND THAT MABY OBAMA OUT!!!!
Posted by: bob | June 22, 2010, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
What we need to is build a double fence and arrest those that hire illegal immigrants. However no is talking about arresting the illegal employers, only the illegal immigrants. That’s one reason we here accusations of racism.
The racism surfaced again when Arizona banned African American and Latino history classes. Then after artists were told to lighten the skin color of the picture of a student depicted on a mural.
Posted by: MrUniteUs | June 22, 2010, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Put other people down just so you can feel better about yourself and soon no one will care how you feel or what happens to you.
Be completely preoccupied with yourself and your own problems and those around you will quickly alienate themselves from you. Listen to others conversations only long enough to find an opening so you can talk more about yourself. This will offend people and turn them off.
Exaggerate everything and become highly emotional about it. Drama becomes tiresome very quickly and soon people will avoid caring about what you have to say.
Ask for advice and then tell the person how stupid it is. Rudeness is a surefire way to alienate people.
Its better to humble yourself rather than be humbled!
Key verse: James 4:10 Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up 5:6Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time. Commentary on James 4:10.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
No one is arguing that traveling to the United States while undocumented is not legal. What the supporters of your STATE LAW, do not want to understand is that police officers DO NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE from a Hispanic American to an undocumented. If they say that they do then, IT’S RACIAL PROFILING: Why is this wrong? Racial profiling doesn’t work, Racial profiling distracts law enforcement agencies from more useful approaches, Racial profiling prevents police from serving the entire community, (When a law enforcement agency practices racial profiling, it sends the message that whites are assumed to be law-abiding citizens while blacks and Latinos are assumed to be criminals) We all know what race the majority of serial killers and sadistic rapists are (whites) look it up. Racial profiling prevents communities from working with law enforcement, Racial profiling is a blatant violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Fourteenth Amendment states, very clearly, that no state may “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Racial profiling is, by definition, based on a standard of unequal protection. Racial profiling is a blatant violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Fourteenth Amendment states, very clearly, that no state may “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Racial profiling is, by definition, based on a standard of unequal protection.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Only citizens that have an inch of character are angry over this law. Artist, musicians, cities and States are boycotting Arizona. Is it because they have ILLEGAL RELATIVES? My entire family (from grandparents to children) were and /or are AMERICAN BORN. I do however cherish my Puerto Rican culture, history and folklore. I was taught my ancestry as a little girl. At 52 I would fight for my country (The USA) but I will also rather die fighting bigotry and ignorance than to stand by the sideline ignoring it. Hell no. Jesus was not afraid to die in the cross for righteousness. Neither am I. I know there’s a few lunatics out there. Thankfully, you are THE MINORTIY in this great country of ours.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Racial profiling can easily escalate into racially-motivated violence, Racial profiling is morally wrong.
When we allow or encourage law enforcement agencies to practice racial profiling, we are ourselves practicing vicarious racial discrimination. That is unacceptable.
THERE’S MILLIONS AMERICAN BORN LATINOS IN THE U.S.A. THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATIONS. WE WILL NEVER ACCEPT GETTING PULLED OVER SOLELY BASED ON THE COLOR OF OUR SKIN.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Rebellion is a grievous sin, since it is disobedience to God, and since it necessarily works such permanent physical ruin and social demoralization among our fellow-men.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
THERE’S MILLIONS AMERICAN BORN LATINOS IN THE U.S.A. THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATIONS. WE WILL NEVER ACCEPT GETTING PULLED OVER SOLELY BASED ON THE COLOR OF OUR SKIN.
Posted by: Cayeyana
I don’t know why people keep repeating this same tired old lie. I don’t know if it’s because they truly do not understand the law or like to lie to feel all high and mighty. The fact is this: the new Arizona law does not allow law enforcement to discrimate or racially profile. Many officers themselves are Hispanic. An officer still needs a valid reason to pull someone over or stop them – speeding, running a red light etc.. Once the person is pulled over, an officer can not use race, nation of origin, accent or even attire to gain reasonable suspicion of illegal status — reasonable suspicion is gained solely through the person’s actions, for example, not producing a valid drivers license. IF there is reasonable suspcion, based on a persn’s actions, not their race, the officer can then ASK “are you in the country legally?” That will be answered with either a “Yes, but I left my tourist visa at the hotel,” or “no.” Either answer can be verified quickly and easily through a database – it’s no more invasive or time consuming than running a check for felonies or warrants during a routine traffic stop. If the suspcion is confirmed, federal agents are called and they make the final determination.
That is the way the law is written. Now tell me, how does that discriminate against anyone?
Posted by: Miss Me | June 22, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Arizona and the country as a whole have dealt with undocumented immigrants forever. Why the big deal now? Governor Brewer shifted the focus of her deficiency as a Governor (very brightly I may add). Constituents were furious with her performance and rightly so. Now, President Obama all of a sudden is responsible for Arizona’s illegal immigration. Funny though that he just got into office. Let’s blame everything on the black man. That’s the real issue isn’t it? It kills you a black man is YOUR CHIEF IN COMMAND!!! Deal with it and grow up.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Miss me. You are obviously not current with the news. A Mexican descendat American trucker got pulled over. NO INFRACTIONS. He was asked for his drivers license and registration. HE PROVIDED THAT. He was asked for his Social Security Card. HE PROVIDED THAT. He was asked for his Birth Certificate. IT WAS HOME. HE WAS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES. Why would he carry it with him? HE WAS ARRESTED UNTIL HIS WIFE BROUGHT IN THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. HOW IS THAT OK? Why will a law abiding citizen have to suffer through an arrest for no other reason THAN THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN? RACIAL PROFILING! A Puerto Rican (by the way you are an AMERICAN when born in Puerto Rico, WE DO NOT HAVE PUERTO RICAN CITIZENSHIP. He got arrested simply because HE LOOKED MEXICAN! WHAT IF HE HAD BEING A LEGAL MEXICAN? How in any one with a sliver of common sense thinks that to be a police state is ok….HOW IN THE WORLD?
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
When is the corrupt Mexican government, stop interfering with “THE PEOPLE” of this nation? How can a foreign government get involved in the state of Arizona’s laws. Perhaps they are getting worried that if we halt the illegal immigration invasion, the billions of dollars they transfer out the country will not get to the upper echelon of President Calderon’s administration who siphons much of the money off. Perhaps they are getting worried across the border, that they will not be able to push all their desperately poor populations across the border, so taxpayers financially subsidize them. One thing for sure Obama and his Liberal-Communist Czars are heading towards an all out war, on American soil. taxpayers have been supporting foreign nationals and “Anchor Babies” for years. Enough is Enough! Learn more at NumbersUSA. WE ARE GOING TO LOSE OUR COUNTRY IF WE DON’T THROW OUT ALL PRO-AMNESTY INCUMBENTS, STARTING WITH SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV) IN NOVEMBER?
Posted by: Brittanicus | June 22, 2010, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Cayeyana, you do realize don’t you that that the Arizona law does not go into effect until the end of July? Here in Arizona, I work closely with law enforcment and border patrol, your story about the truck driver sounds very fishy to me. Who arrested this man? I cross through internal border check points quite often and routinely answer questions about my citizenship, it’s par for the course here in the southwest.
As for why this bill was passed now, rather than last year, that has more to do with Janet Napolitano than Obama. That’s just simply a fact. Arizona legislators tried to pass it four times before, Napolitano vetoed it every time. With a republican governor, now was simply the right time. has nothing to do with Obama or his race.Where in the world would you get a silly idea like that?
Posted by: Miss Me | June 22, 2010, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
The Drug cartels just this last week threatened Nogales, Arizona police officers. Do we have to lose one of our own cops to increase the body count before something gets done. Is it okay if its across the border? Do you really think it won’t spill over? You don’t want the citizens to take matters into their own hands do you? If you won’t protect us, we have a right to protect ourselves.
Last week, a police chief in Cancun was shot and survived.
A deputy police chief in Nogales, Mexico, and his bodyguard were fatally shot in March when gunmen in a pickup truck opened fire on them with assault rifles.
In November 2008, the police chief for the Mexican state that includes Nogales was fatally shot as he entered a hotel with his bodyguard and other officers. The gunmen used grenades as diversions in the fatal ambush a few miles south of the Arizona border.
Posted by: Debbie | June 22, 2010, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Miss me. Where would I get an idea like that? Funny, simply read the comments on this blog alone. That’s your answer. As far as the trucker. If you do the work you do, you should have heard about it. They even read about it in Venezuela!!! Imagine, as you said AND THE LAW IS NOT EVEN IN EFFECT YET. This country is build by intelligent citizens. Bigots and racists are the minority. THE LAW WILL NOT STAND.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Cayeyana – why now? Its because it is getting more violent. These people aren’t coming across to jobs, they are coming to commit crimes. They cost us more money in law enforcement, hospitals, free services that your tax dollars pay for. We are losing money and they are stealing from us left and right. Do you really condone this?
Posted by: Debbie | June 22, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Latino’s are leaving Arizona. BUT WE ARE LEAVING THE GOP IN DROVES!!!
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Cayeyana,
You make an outrageous statement of something occuring even prior to the implementation of the Arizona law. Please cite the source of this story. If this happened, this truck driver has a serious lawsuit that could be pressed. But you really need to note, that first the Arizona law includes provisions for providing penalties against police officers who would operate in such manner (it’s written into the law itself). And two (most importantly) the situation you describe is perfectly legal if the questioning and detention were done by FEDERAL Immigration Agents (ICE). Exactly when are liberals like you going to start filing the lawsuits against the federal government? The Arizona law does nothing more than allow local police to enforce federal law, nothing more. Many cities, including Los Angeles, have volunteered and been provided funding for training and operations to do exactly what AZ wants to do. Where’s your outrage with those people? Is your claim that racial profiling will be accomplished only limited to the police officers in AZ? Be serious, you can’t claim that a citizen of this country is incapable of implementing these policies solely because they work for local authorities and not federal.
Posted by: Keith | June 22, 2010, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
I don’t see anything wrong with the Arizona law, I think it should be practiced in all states. I always carry my license and insurance card, just in case of accident, as does everyone I know.
I would like to see very harsh penalties for those who hire illegals, with huge fines for first offenses and perhaps mandatory jail time for seconds. Those who hire illegals lower wages for the unskilled to increase their profits unfairly compared to their competitor doing the right thing and hiring legal employees.
By the way, this is only one of two things I disagree with the Obama administration about. That’s not bad considering there wasn’t anything I liked about the last administration’s actions!
Posted by: Lydia | June 22, 2010, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Why don’t you do a search? It was on az central and az family and every news channel. Here’s one:
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5683868-heads-up-arizona-this-is-fascism
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Cayeyana – I just figured it out. You live on the East coast since your posts are between 8-9pm and it isn’t even 7pm here in Arizona.
Posted by: Debbie | June 22, 2010, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Lydia. That’s the problem with people that DON’T PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT THEY read. IF YOU “LOOK LIKE A MEXICAN” A DDRIVER’S LICENSE, REGISTRATION AND INSURANCE IS NOT ENOUGH. If you are tanned with dark hair, ALSO BRING YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND SOCIAl SECURITY CARD AT ALL TIMES. COME ON NOW. PAY ATTENTION.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Cayeyana, I just read the opinion piece you posted. Not one credible source is listed. Phoenix is a sanctuary city, by the way, the mayor there is opposed to the law, which has not even been implemented yet. Sorry but I have a hard time believing that Phoenix police are going against their mayor and demanding documents before the law even goes into effect. And once it goes into effect, there’s no need for papers anywhere. Immigration files are all computerized anyway. Where do you guys come up with this “papers please” stuff anyway??
Posted by: Miss Me | June 22, 2010, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I just saw the article and I don’t know if its true. He was stopped at the weigh station and detained by federal Customs and Immigration. Not local police. What I noticed was that Abdon didn’t speak very good English. His mother lives in Mexico and he was born in Fresno, CA. If you were born in the U.S. wouldn’t you be able to speak better English? My guess is he was born here and raised in Mexico (anchor baby). His wife spoke English as good as me. I’m not saying there is anything he did wrong. His answers just didn’t all add up to the officials. Its unfortunate that he was stopped and held, mistakes happen even now before the law is official.
Posted by: Debbie | June 22, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
And once again, the Obama administration shows its true colors – and bows to the real President of the United States, George Soros. Nice to know the Federal Government protects our borders.
Posted by: Bill | June 22, 2010, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Ha, ha, ha. I just read your comment about the trucker. IF HE SPOKE BETTER ENGLISH, then maybe he wouldn’t have being arrested? I would love to see you go to outside of the United states and get arrested because of your accent. Ha, ha, ha, you just proved what we’ve been saying. RACIAL PROFILING. ETHNIC CLEANSING. THANK YOU. I SAVED YOUR POST. I AM USING IT AS AN EXAMPLE WITH OUR PETITION. You are going to be read in every possible blog. That’s hilarious. Ha, ha, ha. Now I really got to go. Ciao. Ha,ha,ha.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to file a lawsuit against the state of Arizona for its immigration law? It’s time for the citizens to file a suit against the federal government for refusing to enforce the immigration laws!
Do I have to assume now that anybody can break into my home and I have no recourse? What is the Justice Department good for? To advance lawlessness? It’s about time to take the law into our own hand if we want it enforced and respected. I am ready because I have a hard time assigning different shades of brownness to race. But than unlike the devout racist Holder, I have a hard time assigning different shades of brownness to race.
Posted by: west129 | June 22, 2010, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Cayeyena, I read the Arizona law pretty thoroughly and I didn’t find anything about needing a birth certificate or social security card if you had a valid driver’s license. To get a license you have to show your birth certificate so that would be redundant. I think you are confusing what happens if you don’t have a license at all, in which case you would have to come up with some other form of i.d.
I’m glad your comment made me read the law, I like it better now. The part about employers who hire illegals a second time losing whatever licenses they need for their business is a terrific idea. I bet there are a lot of ‘cheaters’ hoping this law goes away. For the sake of our fellow Americans without jobs and justice for those employers who don’t cheat by hiring lower paid illegals, I hope this law goes into effect in every state.
By the way, the legal immigrants and those with work visas that I know, don’t like illegals here because it lowers their wages and makes finding a job more difficult.
Posted by: Lydia | June 22, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
I think the President’s suit will not prevail and I for one think it shouldn’t. Moreover, I find the argument that immigration policy being a federal responsibility to be hollow. The federal government has failed in that responsibility repeatedly for more than 3 decades now.I voted for Obama, I’m a registered Democrat, but the immigration problem has not been dealt with at the federal level, the states have the right to pass laws and enforce them. There is nothing patently unconstitutional with what Arizona has done and the pre-emption argument on immigration policy won’t win.
Posted by: St.PeteBill | June 22, 2010, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
You should not need it Lydia. THAT’S the point!! THE POLICE WILL AND ARE ALREADY ASKING FOR THEM, IF YOU LOOK LATINO (TANNED W/DARK HAIR) YOU WILL BE ASKED TO SHOW YOUR BIRTH CERTICATE. SOMETIMES, THAT WILL NOT BE ENOUGH. It is harrassment. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. Let’s say white people come to a Latino country. You are only visiting. But, we are going to trash you and arrest you because, we do not like whites and you’re stupid for not learning Spanish before you came to our Latin Country.
Posted by: Cayeyana | June 22, 2010, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Cayeyena, I don’t go by hearsay. Where are people with valid driver’s licenses being asked for birth certificates? If that is just rumor, that doesn’t count. If that is a few isolated cases, that doesn’t count either, as the news frequently has stories of cops overstepping the bounds, as in every other profession.
As for me visiting a Latin country, I would of course be carrying my passport, etc. on me wherever I went, just as I would when traveling legally to Europe or Asia. It is what people do who are following the rules. I don’t know anyone who travels and doesn’t carry i.d.
And if I was going to work in a Latin country legally, you can bet on me learning a lot of the language before arriving. It would be common sense.
Posted by: Lydia | June 22, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Obama is fight OUR General
Sueing One of our states, Arizona
Sueing to keep thousands out of work with his moratorium on drilling
Nominating Dr. Mengele to head up Medicare
Alienating our allies
Limply responding to direct provocations from North Korea, Iran and Russia
Put us in insurrmountable debt
Anyone feel comfortable with him as President for another two years.
Posted by: Kala | June 22, 2010, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
THE LAW WILL STAND AS WRITTEN-PERIOD.
Posted by: Tman | June 22, 2010, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Read the law before you form an opinion.
As best I remember it spells out at least 4 times that race cannot be used as a determinate to question legal residence.
It also says that a valid driver’s licence or any government issued ID can be used as proof of legal residency.
On occasion I tend to drive a little too fast. As a result I have been stopped by police in several states over the years. City cops, county, and State Troopers. Every single one of them asked to see my driver’s licence. Every single one. These days I go ahead and get out the driver’s licence along with my insurance card and Concealed Handgun Licence. I know he’s going to ask so why wait?
I don’t feel discriminated against because they ask everyone they stop. I don’t feel like I’m being harassed or victimized.
I feel like the cop is just doing his job, some people are too sensitive and our(?) Federal government cares more for illegal aliens than they do citizens. If a cop can ask me for my licence, why can’t he ask someone he suspects of committing a crime?
Posted by: oonogil | June 22, 2010, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
I hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents. This Nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened. All of us ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children to be treated, but this is not the case.
I know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of this law, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO!
Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.
Posted by: Benito | June 22, 2010, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
hmmm has anyone checked those other countries inmigration laws?? You will not stand a chance to live and stay period.The law is the law period. Im welcoming the debate in court.Its about time to take this country back.
Posted by: Frank | June 22, 2010, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
I can see no way that AZ’s law, which merely enforeces the federal law can be unconstituiiinal. The states have to be able to act in the absense of the US Government acting to enforce it’s own laws.
Furthermore, as both a US and an Illinois citizen, I deeply resent the President putting the desires of illegal immigrants over the protection of US citizens.
Posted by: mythoughtis | June 22, 2010, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
regarding the trucker incident… big rigs are covered by the ICC, they have to have CDL’s, insurance papers with them AT ALL TIMES, regardless of nationality.
I will gladly carry my passport with me, along with my DL and proof insurance. If all state required legal residence to get a DL, that would be enough… but they don’t. And, whenever I am in a foreign country, I carry my passport any time I step off the hotel grounds. Enough said.
Posted by: mythoughtis | June 22, 2010, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
WARNING TO ALL AMERICANS AND LEGAL RESIDENTS: Yesterday, several Senators led by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) learned of a possible plan by the White House to provide an Amnesty to the nation’s estimated 11-18 million illegal aliens through an executive order. The move would take immigration enforcement out of the hands of Congress and place it in the hands of the Executive Branch.call your Members of Congress at (202) 224-3121 to express your outrage at Pres. Obama’s plan to provide Amnesty through Executive Order.
Posted by: Brittanicus | June 22, 2010, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Benito, I wouldn’t expect to be able to move to any country I want to without following their rules for immigration. If you are talking about fairness, why only let poor from Mexico and S.A. in illegally, how about India or China or from the poor countries in Africa? We can’t because that is impossible. What we should do is support those governments that are truly trying to help their poor, support international charities that help the poor earn a better living. But allowing our border to remain open with drug wars over the border, drug smuggling and human trafficking, doesn’t address the problem of poverty, it just makes our poor that much poorer, as unskilled jobs are taken by illegals and the wages drop because illegals will work for less.
Posted by: Lydia | June 22, 2010, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Benito;
since when is FOLLOWING THE LAW “discrimination” ???
or do you think we should have NO BORDERS AT ALL AND OPEN ENTRY TO THE ENTIRE WORLD ???
You don’t make sense and are carried away by sentiment and fine words to ignore the commonsense of the situation.
The Fed is NOT ENFORCING EXISTING LAW. THE AZ law is identical to Fed.Law.
Laws exist for a reason Benito, not to discriminate but to maintain order instead of chaos.
but common sense and safety do not concern you since you are full of emotion, anger, etc. and want to suggest that our laws are no good since they are not 100% foolproof…….
So I guess we should not have ANYLAWS at all or we should MONITOR everybreath our enforcers take….youare completely unrealistic and ignore the facts on the ground……..
Are we going to be ruled by CHILDREN or by adults, I want to know…
Posted by: freebird | June 22, 2010, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Keep your grubby actions against Arizonia out of their personal buisness. Most of the Country agrees with Arizona. Why can’t the Federal Government just accept the fact that most Americans are mad as hell about the way that the fed has ignored the illegal immigrant situation!
Posted by: magnum1 | June 23, 2010, 12:15 am 12:15 am
TRUELY UNBELIEVABLE…The Federal Government filing a “lawsuit” against a State for attempting to enforce US law as it is written in the books?
Posted by: Chris Petty | June 23, 2010, 12:28 am 12:28 am
So when it comes down to it, Mr. Obama and Mr. Holder don’t believe we are a “rule of law” country and they’re taking their orders from the clown that came to our country and slammed Americans for getting tired of his illegals coming to our country and leeching off from the backs of hardworking Americans. I would never have guessed in a million years someone from another country would tell our Attorney General….and, our president what to do. Especially a country like Mexico. Thank God we have people like the governer of Arizona, it’s legislature, and the people of Arizona. At least they are trying to be a “rule of law” state like our federal government should be a “rule of law” government and protect Americans from this horrible invasion of illegals who are taking our jobs, money for education, health care, and hundreds of other services.
Posted by: Carl Peterson | June 23, 2010, 12:56 am 12:56 am
As far as racial profiling….what happens when a bank is robbed…the police get a description and start looking for suspects. The illegals have broken into our country and robbed Americans of their hardworking tax dollars. They have committed a crime so we have to look for the robbers. It’s not rocket science…it is only an excuse to be here illegally. Quit robbing from Americans and go back to your own country and then you won’t have to complain about our “rule of law” country. You don’t belong here!
Posted by: Carl Peterson | June 23, 2010, 1:02 am 1:02 am
I’m a Mexican by birth and was brought here by my parents (legally) when I was only 2 years old. I’ve become a U.S. citizen and so has my wife. I feel that the others who want to come here should do it the same way my parents did it. The problem is that the U.S. makes it almost impossible to get those documents nowadays. They charge exorbitant fees and then turn the applicant down after a 2 minute interview without really explaining why. It has become a business for the U.S. to accept applications (that can cost up to $300) knowing full well that they will turn them down. Changes need to be made to make it easier to get visas and legal residency while they are in their countries. As for the AZ law, I’m not against it as a law. What concerns me is the timing. As you can see from the posts here, they are all aimed at Latinos, in particular, against Mexicans. This is what concerns me. Not that the law is wrong but that it will be abused. People should not be surprised to find Mexicans in the southwest and western states. These territories were, afterall, at one time part of Mexico and finding Mexicans there should not come as a surprise to anyone, including law enforcement. What would be out of the ordinary would be finding Asians, Middle Eastern and European whites there. But they will not be the ones to be asked to provide citizenship papers. It will be interesting to see who gets stopped once the law goes into effect. As for the comments that imply that only Mexican cartels deal in drugs and it is a Mexican problem, these persons forget about the Triads, Chinese and Russian mobs and American gangs. Drugs are a worldwide problem not soley Mexican. These problems have existed for many years but for some reason some persons seem to think that this started with the Obama administration. We all know that is not true. Wasn’t it the Repbulicans who recently told Obama to back off any intent to tackle the immigration issue this year? Now they are the ones voicing their frustration with the administration’s inaction. The problem needs to be addressed and solved. But it will require cool heads and the cooperation of all parties to come to a just and humane resolution.
Posted by: Fernando | June 23, 2010, 1:10 am 1:10 am
PS: freebird. Are you living in the same country as me? Last time I CHECKED the Japanese Triads, the Russian & Chinese mobs, the Crips & Bloods were pretty well involved in the drug business and none of these are Mexican. And where do the majority (by a lot) of the drugs end up?? In your own backyard. If the demand for drugs in the U.S. wasn’t so big the problem wouldn’t be so bad. The war on drugs needs to start here.
Posted by: Fernando | June 23, 2010, 1:18 am 1:18 am
I immigrated, from Canada,in 1969 to America. I had to carry my Green Card with me at all times. In 1970, our ski club went to a small fishing village in Mexico in order to raise funds for their local orphanage. We barely had unpacked when we were arrested by local police and brought into their station for questioning. My boyfriend was an American detective and he told me not to tell the police what he did as he would be jailed. Is this reverse racism? We were caucasian. If an illegal from south of the border looks like a Latino, then the police must question them. How else can Arizona control their border?
Posted by: Johanna | June 23, 2010, 2:44 am 2:44 am
New Arizona Immigration Law continues to Test Definitions of Freedom in the US.
Posted by: Lexo | June 23, 2010, 6:00 am 6:00 am
I don’t care what country one came from, if they are here illegally, they need to be deported…PERIOD!
The reason Mexicans become the main theme in this mess, is because they came here by the millions and expect us to change our laws for them! It’s their fault, they did this to themselves…
Just as it is the Mexican’s government for refusing to help their own people!
It’s disgusting that we have had so many Presidents that have allowed so many of our own citizens to be killed and raped, due to their pandering for votes!
It is also disgusting that the Mexican gov. continues to use US citizens as their personal bank!
Close the BORDER NOW…BACK OFF HOLDER!
Posted by: dareisay | June 23, 2010, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Why can’t Arizona sue the government for not securing the borders.
Posted by: mad | June 23, 2010, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Fernando, if the U.S. “demand” for drugs is responsible for illegal activity by Mexicans, then how is it that CANADA, our northern neighbor isn’t sending us lots and lots of drugs and experiencing drug violence like Mexico’s?
As for getting a visa to come here, that’s largely affected by a country’s track record in respecting our immigration laws. When a country has lots of people who overstay their visas to this country, then the State Dept. is tougher on issuing visas. And just why should it be easy to immigrate here? Our immigration policy should be for the good of AMERICANS, not every other country in the world, and having millions of unskilled, uneducated people immigrate here is NOT good for us.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Benito wrote:”This Nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened.”
———-
“Equal” doesn’t mean “the same”, nor does it mean that someone who is not a citizen of this country gets a free pass on coming here illegally. There is NO RIGHT to be here if one is not a citizen.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:24 am 8:24 am
By the way, Fernando, while the American SW may have at one time belonged to Mexico, MEXICO STOLE THEM FROM THE NATIVE AMERICANS. No moral high ground there.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Fernando, Mexico is the ONE country sending the most LEGAL immigrants to this country, 15-20% of our total immigration which now amounts to 1.1 million green cards last year. As an Arab-American, I see no reason why Mexico or any other country should have such a lock on our legal immigration.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Ha, ha, ha. I just read your comment about the trucker. IF HE SPOKE BETTER ENGLISH, then maybe he wouldn’t have being arrested? I would love to see you go to outside of the United states and get arrested because of your accent. Ha, ha, ha, you just proved what we’ve been saying. RACIAL PROFILING. ETHNIC CLEANSING. THANK YOU. I SAVED YOUR POST. I AM USING IT AS AN EXAMPLE WITH OUR PETITION. You are going to be read in every possible blog. That’s hilarious. Ha, ha, ha. Now I really got to go. Ciao. Ha,ha,ha.
———
While your at it, how about including a mention of the illegal alien trucker who got a driver’s license illegally and caused a major accident in Illinois because he couldn’t understand enough English to understand that other drivers were warning him that the load on his truck had come loose. I believe he’s in prison now. Very funny.
Not speaking English is ONE part of a profile that may create reasonable suspicion that someone is here illegally IF someone has been stopped for non immigration violations of the law.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Cayeyena wrote:”Latino’s are leaving Arizona. BUT WE ARE LEAVING THE GOP IN DROVES!!!”
———-
There weren’t that many Latinos in the GOP to begin with, and there aren’t likely to be in the future for the simple reason that Latinos, especially the ones we’re getting now, are heavily dependent on welfare and social services. No way Republicans can compete with Democrats on offering that.
Of course, Latinos are none too happy with Obama these days, either. Not that it really matters, because Latinos are still a very small part of the voters, only 10 million out of 131 million who cast votes for President in 2008.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Arizona’s driver’s license or state ID are proof on the face of it of legal presence because the state verifies immigration status before issuing them. The REAL ID Act requires this of ALL states and those states that don’t comply will eventually find that their licenses are not accepted for entry to federal buildings or boarding airplanes. Arizona will also accept licenses from other states that follow the Real ID Act as proof of legal presence. No need to carry your birth certificate or passport unless you come from a state that DOESN’T have secure licenses. By the way, it’s already federal law, and has been for more than 50 years, that aliens to this country carry proof of their status, i.e. their green card. In the 1950s, they were even required to register with the federal government annually.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am
I checked your link, Cayeyana. The article said the trucker was detained because he was unable to produce identification. Anyone would be if they committed some infraction. A few months ago, I made an illegal turn and was stopped. Had to produce driver’s license and registration. Had I not done so, I no doubt would have been detained.
By the way, I visited Israel a number of years ago–you know, the JEWISH state where many of its citizens were victims of the Nazis. And guess what? THEY DEMAND “PAPERS” very, very frequently. As has every other country I’ve lived in or visited, including Canada.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Miss me. Where would I get an idea like that? Funny, simply read the comments on this blog alone. That’s your answer. As far as the trucker. If you do the work you do, you should have heard about it. They even read about it in Venezuela!!! Imagine, as you said AND THE LAW IS NOT EVEN IN EFFECT YET. This country is build by intelligent citizens. Bigots and racists are the minority. THE LAW WILL NOT STAND.
———-
Bigots and racists ARE the minority and upwards of 60% of Americans SUPPORT this law. We’re tired of illegal aliens claiming “racism” in the enforcement of our laws. As someone recently said, should the police not have gone after the Mafia because most of its members were ITALIAN? The same thing applies to illegal aliens. Should we not identify and remove illegal aliens because many of them are HISPANIC? Frankly, Cayeyena, were it MY ethnic group that was breaking our immigration laws with such impunity (and a number of other laws along with them) then I’d be ashamed. That you’re not says worlds about why Americans shouldn’t legalize illegal aliens–they have no respect for the law and neither do many of their ethnic group. (And let’s get real, Cayayena–you’re not concerned with protecting Americans’ civil rights. You’re concerned with protecting illegal aliens from removal by using the pretense of protecting Americans, EVEN THOUGH THE CONTINUED PRESENCE OF ILLEGAL ALIENS VIOLATES OUR CIVIL RIGHTS. Illegal aliens bolster the population in states such as California which gives that state more representation in Congress while taking it from citizens in non illegal alien heavy states.)
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 8:58 am 8:58 am
MrUniteUS wrote:”What we need to is build a double fence and arrest those that hire illegal immigrants. However no is talking about arresting the illegal employers, only the illegal immigrants. That’s one reason we here accusations of racism.
The racism surfaced again when Arizona banned African American and Latino history classes. Then after artists were told to lighten the skin color of the picture of a student depicted on a mural.
————-
Maybe you should tell the WHOLE story. The AZ law doesn’t ban “ethnic studies” classes per se, only those that are limited to a certain ethnic group or that teach hatred of America. Isn’t it “racist” to limit a class to only Latinos or only African-Americans?
As for the mural, I wonder how quickly a minority would be demanding that one of the figures (or more) on the mural be DARKENED if his race/ethnic group wasn’t represented at all. Why shouldn’t the same hold true when a White figure isn’t shown at all?
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
“President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy,”
Federal immigration restrictions are LAW not policy. The president is charged with enforcing laws, even the one’s he doesn’t like. Obama doesn’t seem to understand that any more than Bush was.
Set policy all you want but enforce the LAW. If you don’t, someone else has to.
Posted by: oonogil | June 23, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Cayeyana wrote:”No one is arguing that traveling to the United States while undocumented is not legal. What the supporters of your STATE LAW, do not want to understand is that police officers DO NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE from a Hispanic American to an undocumented. If they say that they do then, IT’S RACIAL PROFILING: Why is this wrong?”
———–
The difference between an Hispanic American and an illegal alien is, well, DOCUMENTS. Which is why police, DURING LAWFUL CONTACT for non immigration violations, have every right to ask to see documents proving status if you can’t produce an AZ driver’s license or other secure document. The AZ law also requires “reasonable suspicion” and PART of reasonable suspicion is race/ethnicity. It just can’t be the reason for stopping someone or the only reason for suspecting someone. Along with other factors, such as the failure to produce documents, inability to speak English, and certain behaviors, such as piling a dozen people into a small vehicle, it creates “reasonable suspicion” that someone is here illegally. And reasonable suspicion just says that there is a high probability that someone is breaking a law and allows the police to check further. Reasonable suspicion is already part of law and the Arizona police are being trained on what constitutes reasonable suspicion in regard to illegal immigration.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Only citizens that have an inch of character are angry over this law. Artist, musicians, cities and States are boycotting Arizona. Is it because they have ILLEGAL RELATIVES? My entire family (from grandparents to children) were and /or are AMERICAN BORN. I do however cherish my Puerto Rican culture, history and folklore. I was taught my ancestry as a little girl. At 52 I would fight for my country (The USA) but I will also rather die fighting bigotry and ignorance than to stand by the sideline ignoring it. Hell no. Jesus was not afraid to die in the cross for righteousness. Neither am I. I know there’s a few lunatics out there. Thankfully, you are THE MINORTIY in this great country of ours.
————–
Let’s see. As I recall, a number of those musicians have had run ins of their own with the law, such as Willie Nelson. And the cities and states boycotting this law are known sanctuaries for illegal aliens, and therefore breaking FEDERAL law which prohibits sanctuary cities.
Now, tell us what YOU’D do to enforce immigration law. You know, something that’s not “bigoted” or “racist”? For example, many of us (and the AZ law) want use of eVerify and SS no match letters to be mandatory for employers to use. After all, Social Security numbers have no race.
Of course, groups such as LaRaza, the SEIU, and the ACLU have sued to stop the use of these. After all, if one dries up jobs then illegal aliens have to leave, don’t they?
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Miss me. You are obviously not current with the news. A Mexican descendat American trucker got pulled over. NO INFRACTIONS. He was asked for his drivers license and registration. HE PROVIDED THAT. He was asked for his Social Security Card. HE PROVIDED THAT. He was asked for his Birth Certificate. IT WAS HOME. HE WAS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES. Why would he carry it with him? HE WAS ARRESTED UNTIL HIS WIFE BROUGHT IN THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. HOW IS THAT OK? Why will a law abiding citizen have to suffer through an arrest for no other reason THAN THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN? RACIAL PROFILING! A Puerto Rican (by the way you are an AMERICAN when born in Puerto Rico, WE DO NOT HAVE PUERTO RICAN CITIZENSHIP. He got arrested simply because HE LOOKED MEXICAN! WHAT IF HE HAD BEING A LEGAL MEXICAN? How in any one with a sliver of common sense thinks that to be a police state is ok….HOW IN THE WORLD?
—————
If this really happened, then it happened WITHOUT the AZ law and just shows that it can happen anywhere, any time, with any law–or without a law.
Pulling over someone because of the way they look is pure and simple, WRONG. And is prohibited by the new AZ law.
But you know, I’m more than a little tired with your self-absorption. I’m of Arab ancestry, and as “brown” as my Mexican-American sister-in-law. My ancestors have experienced discrimination, just have those of other ethnic groups–Italians, Greeks, Irish, etc. But you’d never know it from Hispanics. Furthermore, Cayayena, I work with several Hispanic professionals, TWO of whom are blonde, blue-eyed, and WHITE. I find it silly and self-serving for “Hispanics” to claim special perks (affirmative action, the right to come here illegally) because they’re “brown” when many are no such thing.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Arizona’s law is very similar to the Oklahoma law that has been in effect for a couple of years. Oklahoma has the largest concentration of Native Americans in the US. In case no one has noticed, a lot of us have dark skin.
I haven’t heard any of the tribes complain that their people are being harassed because of that particular law. No more than normal anyway. So the idea that cops are stopping everyone with dark skin is ludicrous at best.
Both states require that the police officer make contact for another reason before asking for identification. That’s all they’re doing, asking for identification. If the person can’t provide identification or produces fake identification the officer takes them into custody. Can’t they do that to everyone?
If I drive 95mph down I-40 today chances are that some cop will stop me, eventually. If I don’t produce and ID and I refuse to speak English I have a 99% chance of going to jail. I wouldn’t call it discrimination, I’d call it abusing my old pickup.
Posted by: oonogil | June 23, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Arizona and the country as a whole have dealt with undocumented immigrants forever. Why the big deal now? Governor Brewer shifted the focus of her deficiency as a Governor (very brightly I may add). Constituents were furious with her performance and rightly so. Now, President Obama all of a sudden is responsible for Arizona’s illegal immigration. Funny though that he just got into office. Let’s blame everything on the black man. That’s the real issue isn’t it? It kills you a black man is YOUR CHIEF IN COMMAND!!! Deal with it and grow up
———
Cayayena, if more than 43% of WHITE Americans hadn’t voted for Obama, he wouldn’t be in office. The votes of ALL Latinos (he only got 70%) and ALL Blacks wouldn’t have been enough to put him in office.
The “big deal” now is the death of an AZ rancher whose last known action was to deal with an illegal alien border crosser. Of course, having 460,000 illegal aliens in a state and the crime associated with being a throughway for illegal alien and drug smugglers has a lot to do with it, too.
As for Obama, well, he’s been in office for 18 months, so the problem now is HIS. And he hasn’t dealt with it. Most certainly he hasn’t increased enforcement of the law. In fact, he’s doing everything he can to keep as many illegal aliens in the country as possible, refusing to deport those that ICE identifies and refusing to make use of eVerify mandatory. He’s made it clear he wants amnesty, but he and his party can’t afford to push it before the midterm elections–and quite possibly won’t have the votes after them. So, instead he engages in non feasance, non enforcement of the law JUST AS PRESIDENTS BEFORE HIM HAVE DONE. In short, he’s not the “change” he promised us.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Cayayena wrote:”Rebellion is a grievous sin, since it is disobedience to God, and since it necessarily works such permanent physical ruin and social demoralization among our fellow-men.”
———
No wonder so many Latin countries are such messes.
Posted by: Ali | June 23, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Fernando: We have a limited amount of applications for a reason, it is a long process because a few billion would love the opportunity to immigrate to the U.S. We have a finite amount of space. Just can’t absorb too many people at once, we need SKILLED HIGHLY EDUCATED immigrants, not low skilled, we have more than enough people in the states who are identified as low skilled and cannot continue to higher education due to intelligence and learning disabilities, if the line is too long, doesn’t make it right to jump the fence. It puts those who are here legally at jeopardy with their jobs and livelihood because an extra person has stripped that person’s opportunity away by being able to secure a position at a desired cheaper wage and entering the system to secure housing and food stamps with an anchor child, AMERICAN FAMILIES are homeless, they are documented, 25% of the homeless population are AMERICAN CHILDREN, their parents would love the opportunity to secure housing and jobs that the illegal immigrant is working at, such as meatpacking, culinary, construction, hospitality, etc.
Posted by: phantomiter | June 23, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am
I am not in agreement with AZ because I do believe it is a potential magnet for profiling, however, I believe Gov. Brewer who took over and as been in office since Napolatano has left, she was determined to rid the drug cartels taking over park lands within the state, kidnappings, killings, jobs etc. She wants the national guard to clean that up, she doesn’t want the state to turn into a ghetto.
Posted by: phantomiter | June 23, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
oonogil: Interesting to note Oklahoma has the 4th lowest unemployment rate in the nation. They figured out the job that no American is willing to do is a fallacy.
Posted by: phantomiter | June 23, 2010, 10:11 am 10:11 am
>>. He got arrested simply because HE LOOKED MEXICAN!
Posted by: Ali | Jun 23, 2010 9:28:15 AM<<
Ali,
I live about 1 mile from where the truck driver was stopped. ICE (federal officers – not AZ!) had set up a random check point. The driver you wrote about was detained – NOT arrested. He was a commercial truck driver, driving a commercial vehicle and the only ID he carried was a driver's license. He was required by Federal law to carry two forms of ID. He had one! His social security card was in his wife's purse and she was at work. She drove home and got his birth certificate.
There was no racial profiling involved in this case. ICE performs these random road blocks frequently. The truck driver was not charged although he could have been for failure to carry proper identification while driving a commercial vehicle.
ABC removes links to websites so I can't post the link to the story here. If you google for the Phoenix ABC website you can find the story there. It happened back in April. The driver was on the Gilbert 202. Be sure to look for the updated article with the comments from ICE explaining why he was detained.
Again, this was not racial profiling, it was not the color of skin. It was about a man who lacked the ID required by FEDERAL LAW!
Posted by: AZ Granny | June 23, 2010, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Ali, my apologies. My post at 11:07am was directed to Cayeyana.
Posted by: AZ Granny | June 23, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am
The illegal immigrant population of the United States in 2008 was estimated by the Center for Immigration Studies to be about 11 million people, down from 12.5 million people in 2007.[2] According to a Pew Hispanic Center report, in 2005, 57% of illegal immigrants were from Mexico; 24% were from other Latin American countries, primarily from Central America;[3] 9% were from Asia; 6% were from Europe; and 4% were from the rest of the world.[3]——-SO how do you not go after the ILEGAL ALIEN MEXICAN/HISPANIC’S
Posted by: Don | June 23, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Holder and Obama should resign. They are making a mockery of our country using the same old BS skin color.
When you fly on a plane you have to show ID. I don’t see anything wrong with having to show ID outside the airport at least temporarily till we catch the illegals that crossed our borders. And the Mexican government should keep their filthy noses out of our business.
Posted by: RodentKing | June 23, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I thought the President was supposed to protect the people of the United State of America, Not the People of Mexico, especially criminals.
Posted by: Bil | June 23, 2010, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“Why now? Its because it is getting more violent. These people aren’t coming across to jobs, they are coming to commit crimes.”
Ummmm, hate to interrupt you with some actual truth, but violent crime rates are lower now in AZ than they have been since the 70′s, and property crime rates are lower than they’ve been since the 60′s. It’s easily found information…look it up. This law has nothing to do with violent crime and everything to do with xenophobia and bigotry. And it’s obvious.
Posted by: prettywitty | June 23, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Send the Department of Justice to
the Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge
in southern Arizona. The Prosecutors
shall have no guns and be forced to spend
one week their. If still alive after said week
I am sure they will be sounding just like
a certain general. For all those unaware
of the Buenos Aires wildlife refuge,
let it be known that the wildlife is
not the problem.
Posted by: deadwrestler | June 23, 2010, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
It must be tough for people like CND Fox and prettywitty to keep trying to convince people that the Arizona law is bigoted when more and more people are taking it upon themselves to actually read the law and compare it to the decades-old federal immigration enforcement law. I can point to at least four places in the Arizona law (which is far more lenient than the federal law) where it specifically says (written into the law) that racial profiling is prohibited. The law spells out what is acceptable for deeming reasonable suspicion (nope, a cop can’t use race, accent or skin color to determine reasonable suspicion). Truth is, writers of the AZ SB 1070 took painstaking steps to ensure that racial profiling won’t occur.
Cayeanna wrote that a drivers license won’t be enough to prevent racial profiling, yet it is written into the law that a drivers license IS to be considered acceptable to officers, so if a driver has one, there is no reasonable suspicion to think the driver might be an illegal immigrant.
For those of you who continue to say that this law will result in racial profiling or that it is bigoted, please cite at least one clause in the bill that leads you to believe that. Otherwise, you are simply spouting off uninformed opinions, not educated facts.
Posted by: Livin' in AZ | June 23, 2010, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
More Americans killed by illegal aliens than Iraq war, study says The liberal LA Times is now reporting that Mexico’s drug wars are now north of the borders–but soto voce. Think about it. A man or woman killed in Iraq or Iran in the line of duty is a hero. But what is an American killed at home by an illegal alien because the government has failed in its sworn duty to guard the borders. This is a pact between the sovereign and the person has paid taxes and loyalty.
Posted by: Don | June 23, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
If the Federal govt interferes with the
Arizona law the governor should grant
pardons to all illegal alien prisioners in
Arizona prisons and jails and transport them to Washington D.C. and Los Angelas
for a better life.
Posted by: Phil | June 23, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
If the Federal govt interferes with the
Arizona law the governor should grant
pardons to all illegal alien prisioners in
Arizona prisons and jails and transport them to Washington D.C. and Los Angelas
for a better life.
Posted by: Phil | June 23, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Arizona can end this so fast by just placing members of the Black Panthers on the border with billy-clubs. Holder wouldn’t touch that with a ten foot pole.
Posted by: Eddie | June 23, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Prettywitty, your crime stats are wrong. Phoenix is the kidnapping capital of the US, 2nd in the world!
If you don’t live in Arizona then you probably don’t know that the BLM (a federal agency) has installed caution signs at six national parks in AZ. I highly doubt these signs would be necessary if the crime rates were lower than the 1970′s.
The signs read:
DANGER – PUBLIC WARNING
TRAVEL NOT RECOMMENDED
Active Drug and Human Smuggling Areas
Visitors May Encounter Armed Criminals and Smuggling Vehicles Traveling At High Rates Of Speed
Stay Away From Trash, Clothing and Backpacks and Abandoned Vehicles
If You See Suspicious Activity, Do Not Confront! Move Away and Call 911
BLM Encourages Visitors To Use Public Lands North of Interstate 8
The Six National Parks / Monuments:
Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (3500 acres closed)
Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument (60% of 330,689 acres closed)
Ironwood Forest National Monument
Sonoran Desert National Monument
Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge
Coronado National Forest
Gov Brewer stated that 1,000 illegals cross into AZ each day. Of those, 70-80% already have a criminal history.
The US Border Patrol Weekly Blotter, a newsletter informing of illegals detained and arrested, showed last week that 4 illegals were previously convicted of child rape or sex offense and deported. Yet here they were once again in AZ. Other illegals detained were gang members and drug runners.
And these were just the ones that were caught. Many more go unapprehended.
Posted by: AZ Granny | June 23, 2010, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
It is odd that there has been this big spike in right wing idiocy coming out of Arizona though. Texas has a higher background level of crazy and right now Arizona is like a supernova taking the attention. I wonder how long it will last.
Actually it isn’t that strange. Arizona has been moving gradually towards the middle over the last twenty years. The population has doubled in that time and a big part of that spike wasn’t old retirees who tended to be conservative, but a lot of younger families moving from blue states, etc. In 2008 McCain only received 53.4% of the vote here in Arizona, his sixth lowest vote total among the states he won. Now think about that, his home state was one of his least supportive states. Had McCain been from Texas, Florida, etc., he likely would have lost Arizona.
This state has a long history of very conservative, often racist politics and the supporters of those policies aren’t happy that they are consistently losing ground to moderates and liberals (simply termed as liberals in their tirades). Because of how the state legislature is set up conservatives still have a major majority in both houses but, when Napolitano was governor, she vetoed a lot of their stupidity. In fact she set the record for vetoes in the history of the state. You take her away, bring in Brewer who is a wing-nut’s wing-nut, and you see incredibly stupid legislation that was shut down by a reasonable governor make it out of the state house. At the same time you see an increase in non-conservative population as well as an increase in non-white population and the far white err, right is freaking out.
Posted by: Dogmeat | June 23, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
dogmeat, Stopping the evils of human trafficking and drug smuggling is not about politics and anyone with any sense of humanity understands that. Look 50 years down the road, and think about how you would answer these questions to your grandchildren, then you will understand why the Arizona law (and others like it) was needed:
1) Why did you not pressure your government leaders to do more to stop the Mexican drug cartels? How could you allow the violence and non-stop flow of drugs to get so out of control?
2) Why did you, and others, encourage impoverished Mexican citizens to pay their life savings to criminal human trafficking rings, who kidnapped, assaulted and raped them, and in some cases left them to die alone in the desert, in their journey to the US? How could you not care about those poor souls?
3) Why did you not do more to close the border so that these atrocities would not happen on American soil? Did Americans not learn from its history of slavery that human trafficking is wrong?
4) What did you do when the federal government was forced to close several historic parks on the border due to violence among drug smugglers and human traffickers?
5) What did you do about the environmental degradation caused to the cacti, trees and wildlife as human traffickers and drug smugglers trekked through and camped out on US park lands?
6) When you were confronted with statistics like these: Border Patrol apprehends about 200,000 illegal Mexican immigrants on the US border every year and 4 and 10 turned out to have convictions like child molestation, drug smuggling, etc., did you not care for the safety of your children or your community?
7) How many people should be allowed into the country every year without proper authority, fingerprinting, background checks? What should the cut off be? Does 200,000 illegal entries every year not seem significant enough?
8) Why do you think it is OK to turn around a boatload of Haitians and tell them they must come to the country legally even after an earthquake, but to say to the Mexican immigrants that they are above those laws … they are welcome. Is that not racist?
Examine your conscience, forget the stupid politics and think about how you will answer these questions when future generations ask why we allowed this to happen.
Posted by: Livin' in AZ | June 23, 2010, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
I am glad that Obama will challege SB 1070. It’s wrong to force American citizens to carry passports in their own country. Ilegal immigration and crime along the border has actually been declining in Arizona. The root of Arizona’s economic problem is the housing crisis and all of the foreclosures, not migrant workers. Brewer is a failure as Governor and that’s why she needs gimmicks like SB 1070.
Posted by: freedom | June 23, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Re: “she [Brewer} was determined to rid the drug cartels taking over park lands within the state, kidnappings, killings, jobs etc. ”
Oh please. That’s not true. She needs to make AZ seem like it’s under seige to justify this racist bill. The reality is that Hispanics vote Democratic so she wants to drive them out of the state before they can vote her out of office.
Posted by: freedom | June 23, 2010, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
“Fernando: We have a limited amount of applications for a reason, it is a long process because a few billion would love the opportunity to immigrate to the U.S. We have a finite amount of space. Just can’t absorb too many people at once, we need SKILLED HIGHLY EDUCATED immigrants, not low skilled, we have more than enough people in the states who are identified as low skilled and cannot continue to higher education due to intelligence and learning disabilities, if the line is too long, doesn’t make it right to jump the fence. It puts those who are here legally at jeopardy with their jobs and livelihood because an extra person has stripped that person’s opportunity away by being able to secure a position at a desired cheaper wage and entering the system to secure housing and food stamps with an anchor child, AMERICAN FAMILIES are homeless, they are documented, 25% of the homeless population are AMERICAN CHILDREN, their parents would love the opportunity to secure housing and jobs that the illegal immigrant is working at, such as meatpacking, culinary, construction, hospitality, etc.
Posted by: phantomiter | Jun 23, 2010 9:44:19 AM”
Again EXCELLENT comment and right on!
Why is it that someone that snuck into the country can get a job but legal people can’t get one?
Try that crap in another country you’ll be arrested pronto!
And then OH its racist if you tell illegal invaders that they have no right to be in america! LOL
These people can do whatever they want just because THEY said so and when law officials confront them, they get called racist!
LOL biggest joke i have ever heard!
Can’t let everybody in the country there wouldn’t be enough room and if they wanted to be here they should have LEGALLY immigrated.
They have no right to sneak into the country and then make demands as if they own the country and somebody owes them something!
Posted by: JaniceThornton | June 23, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
“The reality is that Hispanics vote Democratic so she wants to drive them out of the state before they can vote her out of office. ” – freedom
? ? ? ?
Since when were illegal invaders allowed to vote?
Posted by: Noz | June 24, 2010, 10:57 am 10:57 am
With more and more cities & states getting immigration laws of there own,it will put a strain on economics for all tax payers if US government get involved. The best interest is to work with all states to devise a plan. I would like to know what part of illegal does this nation don’t understand. Will the protesters of the laws willing to put up half there family income to support there people untill they become legal to rid the cost for us legals. I don’t think it’s fair for us to provide free food, education and healthcare to those breaking the law along with taking jobs that we could get. I feel tha companies hiring illegals is not only contributing to there pocketbooks, but for illegals it is stealing from america. Companies that want to hire immigrants from other countries should move there business to that country and pay 4x the import & export tax. I am sure there is a solution that will be beneficial for everyone and lawsuits is not one of them.
Posted by: nanners1961 | June 24, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Mexico is suing Arizona? What? However, Mexico considers the USA one of their states, they have been stealing from the USA for decades, drugs and cheap labor who funnel Billions back to Mexico and taking jobs, lowering the wages of US Citizens.
Now the Feds are suing Arizona. What the hell is going on here? Arizona has 500,000 Illegals not including the “anchor babies” in their state. We have 200,000 Illegals not including the “anchor babies” in our state. Since the Federal Government, for 30 years, looked the other way, allowing this mess to bulge to 20 million, the Feds better look the other way, when it comes to states addressing the failure of the Federal Government to do anything about this nightmare for 30 years.
The Arizona law was introduced, debated, passed and voted on by the citizens of Arizona to address a serious problem in their state that was caused by those responsible, for 30 years, who DID NOTHING about it. What the hell do you expect?
Suing them over a law to fix the parasites invading their state borders is dumb and should tick everyone in the other 49 states off.
Posted by: Mike | June 24, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Google Buenos Aires national wildlife
refuge. This is southern Arizona
national park and is off limits to U.S,
citizens because the true animals
there are illegals that will kill you if
you cross their path. Also they kill and eat
the protected animals. Where is peta
or better yet the Obama family vacation.
after all he wants all these people to be
given amnesty. His new voter base .
Posted by: deadwrestler | June 24, 2010, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
You will rail on AZ for there Law and how harsh it is you like it when the Mexican puppet criticized AZ. but you know if you think Mexico is better lets just revise our policy to mimic Mexico’s Law. would that make you happy. would that salve the issue?
I can agree with that if you can. other wise shut your trap. you don’t want to know my plan to stop this invasion.
that is what it is and in some cases it is a violent armed invasion on unarmed US citizens.
if you don’t like it no-one is making you stay here.
Posted by: gunthar | June 24, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
i believe that some people in here needs to educate and see how the state is going to heel just for a stupid and raisist law
Posted by: arturo | June 28, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
This just blows me away……Obama has the nerve to sue Arizona? The US is under attack from mexico and Obama takes Mexico’s side? Time for impeachment procedings!!!!!
I voted for Obama and I am ashamed helping this traitor get into office.
Posted by: Bob Sanders | July 7, 2010, 6:37 am 6:37 am
When Obama sided with Mexico, and congress gave President of Mexico a standing ovation. It open the door for all these other countries.
You Obama are doing a good job in breaking up our country. We are the United States FYI not US minus Arizona.
Posted by: firedup49 | July 20, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Since the government is suing the state of Arizona, I believe Governor Brewer has the right to demand to see Obama’s qualifications to be President. I believe she has the right to demand he produce a birth certificate to prove his US citizenship.
Wonder if she will do it.
Posted by: DRufino | July 25, 2010, 2:39 am 2:39 am