By Gregory

Jul 6, 2010 7:03pm

Former DOJ Attorney Alleges “Lawlessness” in Civil Rights Division

ABC News' Jason Ryan reports: A former trial attorney in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division today blasted top officials at the Justice Department for dismissing a lawsuit against members of the New Black Panthers Party in an voter intimidation case from election day 2008. The attorney J. Christian Adams described the Justice Department’s voting right section as “lawless” before a hearing of the US Commission on Civil Rights, which is investigating the 2008 incident where two Black Panther members stood outside of a Philadelphia polling location allegedly yelling racial slurs while one of the men brandished a nightstick.
The Justice Department initially filed a lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party for violating the Voting Rights Act, which protects voters from acts of intimidation and coercion. A federal judge was set to award judgement to the Justice Department in the matter since the Black Panther members failed to respond to the legal action and the complaint filed against them.  But in the final days of the case, the Justice Department headquarters ordered that the case be dismissed in May 2009.
Adams testified today before the Commission that “political appointees made the decision,” to drop the case.  Adams cited a hostile work environment in the division and said that officials there had openly stated they did not have an interest in pursing race-neutral civil rights prosecutions. Adams' claims and testimony comes after the Division was found to be undercut during the tenure of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales when officials had improperly used political affiliations in the hiring process. Attorney General Holder and other top officials have vowed to return the Civil Rights Division to its previous stature.
Adams testified that his superiors had stated that they had little interest in bringing cases against black defendants. “The section doesn’t want to protect white voters.” Adams said. Adams, who has been labeled as a “conservative” by some media outlets stated his only interest was in protecting people’s rights to vote and ensuring equal constitutional protections. Adams referenced the Civil War and said that so many had fought for the right to vote that any case of voter intimidation should be followed, “It doesn’t matter if it’s one person with a stick or 5 people…so many people died to get us to this point.” Adams said before the commission.
The US Civil Rights Commission, made up of 4 Republican members, 2 Democrats and 2 Independents has been investigating the incident and the Justice Department’s dismissal of the lawsuit since June 2009.  One of the Commission members, Michael Yaki, a Democrat, stated that the Commission’s investigation has been overly partisan and declined to attend today’s hearing. 
The investigation has focused on Minister King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, who were featured on several videos and news reports from election day. Shabazz is seen on the video holding a nightstick just a few feet away from the entrance to the polling location.
During a May 14, 2010 hearing before the Commission, the head of the Civil Rights Division, Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez said, “The Department concluded that the allegations in the complaint against Jerry Jackson, the other defendant present at the polling place, as well as the allegations against the national New Black Panther Party and its leader, Malik Zulu Shabazz, did not have sufficient evidentiary support. The Department reviewed the totality of the evidence in the applicable law in reaching these decisions.”
Despite the Justice Department offering numerous documents and some witnesses to the Commission, the Commission has said the Department has only been fulfilling requests in the investigation to appear transparent.
In a May 9, 2010 letter to the Attorney General, Commission Chairman Gerald A. Reynolds expressed his displeasure with delays from the Justice Department in the inquiry asserting, “The Department has repeatedly delayed the production of critical documents and information. When it has provided information, the Department appears to have done so only to maintain the appearance of cooperation and has timed its production of voluminous, but largely non-responsive documents to prevent adequate review by the Commission before critical junctures in the Commission’s scheduled proceedings. It has further refused outright to provide answers and documents to some of the Commission’s most critical questions and requests, and has refused to permit its employees with substantive knowledge of this case to cooperate with the Commission’s subpoenas.”
Adams resigned from the Department earlier this year and one of his superiors Christopher Coates, who was the Chief of the Voting Section, has also left his post and is now working for the Department in South Carolina at the US Attorney’s office.

User Comments

“The section doesn’t want to protect white voters.” Adams said. Adams, who has been labeled as a “conservative” by some media outlets stated his only interest was in protecting people’s rights to vote and ensuring equal constitutional protections”
I guess that’s why he’s talked to every right wing nut with a microphone.
I think he’s been on FoxNews enough in the last two weeks to get the title of commentator.
But hey FoxNews has to keep older whites angry. What better way to do that than to exaggerate the Black Panther Party, old racist tricks work best.
Its the only thing the GOP is selling these days.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Shooting the messenger doesn’t work for me here. Selective enforcement of voting rights laws in indefensible, no matter which way it swings.

Posted by: Fred | July 6, 2010, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Thank you ABC for being the first MSM outlet OTHER than Fox and the NY Post to cover this story.
This lawyer says he quit his DOJ position on principle, and he’s now speaking out as a whistleblower. Everybody saw the video of those Black Panthers. Why would Eric Holder be involved in making a decision about such a relatively minor case?
The perception is that it stinks and it’s good to see ABC at covering the story.

Posted by: Bob | July 6, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Maybe the reason he’s been on FOX is because it’s the only privately owned network and, therefore, doesn’t have to ignore the truth or lie like the other networks who are in the pocket of government. This man is giving up his life’s career for the truth. The video of the black panther’s blatant voter intimination is disgusting. I would feel the same way if it were republicans or democrats. Voter intimination is wrong and needs to be corrected through the law. The black panthers should be punished. Period!

Posted by: bunnie | July 6, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

I saw the video of the black panthers outside that voting station with their bats ..they were super scary! No disrespect to the hard working members of the US border patrol, but Holder ought to send these brothers from Philly to Arizona..(He seems to be ok. with their tactics, put ‘em on the govt payroll!)

Posted by: cindy | July 6, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Adams was one of the attorneys hired by Bradley Schlotzman, who was found to have “inappropriately considered political affiliation when hiring career attorneys”, and then purjured himself in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Adams’ tenure at civil rights was a product of discrimination and misconduct.
As to the allegations themselves, you would think an organization with the resources of ABC news would be able to report that Adams has serious credibility problems, not the least of which is he has admitted he has no knowledge of the meetings and conversations that he is attempting to point to as evidence in the matter.

Posted by: Flash Override | July 6, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

I’ve seen the video and the New Black Panthers should have been prosecuted to the full extent of the law and they were not.
Barack Obama ran promising that he would move America to a post racial state. Not so. He and his team are obviously and openly bigoted against white Americans. And that’s reprehensible.

Posted by: joinamerica | July 6, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

This is constitutionally important and needs far more independent vetting. I hope it goes to court to become more transparent.

Posted by: matthew burns | July 6, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Ryan C wrote:”I think he’s been on FoxNews enough in the last two weeks to get the title of commentator.”
.
So ABC “News” is two weeks late to the game. Anyone surprised? Better than having to report on oBama’s knowledge of his Illinois senate seat up for sale by Blago.

Posted by: gk | July 6, 2010, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

“But then the administration moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a “deadly weapon” near a polling place until 2012.”…HAHAHAHA! I get it! No more voter intimidation with black uniforms and nightsticks..until the next presidential election! WOW!!

Posted by: cindy | July 6, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Interesting head in the sand with a straw sucking up the koolaid take on it, Ryan. In the videos and most especially the National Geographic documentary (oh, didn’t know about that? “Inside The New Black Panthers”) the NBPP speak for themselves… the panthers calling black republican poll watchers “race traitors”, the panthers smacking their hands with their billy clubs, one panther saying “Cracker, you about to be ruled by a black man.” Hardly exaggeration by the GOP.
And then there’s always Bartle Bull, the famous civil rights attorney. He was New York campaign manager for Robert Kennedy in 1968 and for Jimmy Carter in 1978. He is a liberal and life long Democrat and former Director of both New York Magazine and The Village Voice. In the 1960s Bull worked for the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law seeking to enforce the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in Mississippi protecting both black voters and black political candidates from voter intimidation. Bartle Bull is an expert on voter rights. Bartle Bull is a liberal. And Bartle Bull is taking action against the Eric Holder Department of Justice and the Obama Administration for its dismissal of the case against the New Black Panthers. Bull Bartle was present at the polling station in Philadelphia on that day in November 2008 and he is a witness to what happened.
He is the uncomfortable reality, my friend. The inconvenient truth, as it were.

Posted by: b kaye | July 6, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

“So ABC “News” is two weeks late to the game”
He testified today which was actually newsworthy.
But hey FoxNews told you it was important 2 weeks ago so in your mind that;s the way it is.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

“Thank you ABC for being the first MSM outlet OTHER than Fox and the NY Post to cover this story.”
ROFLMAO!
Even as they are led by the nose by Murdoch, right wingers still seem unaware of it.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Anyone that is defending the INACTION/Dismissal of these charges by the administration should be subjected to racial slurs and threats of attack the next time THEY vote. Perhaps then, they too would understand what is really at stake here.

Posted by: Bill Dapille | July 6, 2010, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Shorter Right Wing news; ignore Wall Street trying avoiding scrutiny in collusion with the GOP and the GOP cutoff of your unemployment benefits, there’s black men about to be frightened of.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

My daughter is a blonde, 5’3″, 105 pound Temple grad student living in North Philadelphia. Do you think the sight of those two Black Panthers with their night sticks waiting at the door would have intimdated her and kept her from voting?….Mr. Holder?

Posted by: cindy | July 6, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Why wasn’t this on World News tonight Diane? Guess one’s ability to vote without intimidation, one of the most important freedoms we have, is nowhere near as important as touting the ability of the Obama Administration to sue Arizona to continue the Federal Government’s INABILITY to stop illegals from crossing the border.

Posted by: cbrad | July 6, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

“He is a liberal and life long Democrat”
Which is why he emphatically campaigned for John McCain in 2008.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

“Only conservatives care about the law. I want wrongdoers punished by the law w/o regard to their politics. That’s what law is for.”
Where are the conservatives then?
All I see are a bunch of reactionary right wingers.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

“in which case the law is a weapon to be used against those who don’t agree with you..”
You mean like ACORN?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

If the video shows that the Panthers were intimidating voters,or even appearing to interfere with the election process,it should be investigated. To give them a pass is as racist as giving a pass to white voter intimidation efforts in the south in the 1950s and 1960s.There is no place for Affirmative Action justice.

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

:If the video shows that the Panthers were intimidating voters,or even appearing to interfere with the election process,it should be investigated. To give them a pass is as racist as giving a pass to white voter intimidation efforts in the south in the 1950s and 1960s.There is no place for Affirmative Action justice.”
So 2 knuckleheads playing dressup outside a predominantly African American is the same as the murder and violence used against African Americans not just for voting but the same public drinking fountain?
I guess I should be amazed but we’ve done this dance too many times before.
Let me guess you are also angry that you can’t use the n word when rapppers use it all the time.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Sorry Ryan,the Black-on-Black rate of felony crimes in northern cities far exceeds the number of assaults,robberies and murders seen in the South during Jim Crow.You obviously haven’t been in an inner city,you obviously haven’t seen the consequences of armed “knucleheads” and the devastation to the families of the victims.

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Ryan C wrote:”So 2 knuckleheads playing dressup outside a predominantly African American is the same as the murder and violence used against African Americans not just for voting but the same public drinking fountain?”
.
Tough defending a party (DEMOCRAT) where a prerequisite to being elected is to have a “fleeting association” with the KKK according to Bill Clinton. He admits you HAD to be a RACIST to get elected as a DEMOCRAT. We already knew that DEMOCRATS would SAY ANYTHING, and DO ANYTHING to get elected and stay elected. Bill was just stating the obvious.

Posted by: gk | July 6, 2010, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

“Sorry Ryan,the Black-on-Black rate of felony crimes in northern cities far exceeds the number of assaults,robberies and murders seen in the South during Jim Crow”
And what that has to do with murdering people for registering folks to vote or beating, fire hosing and setting dogs lose on protesters, perhaps you can share with us.
Are you arguing that because black on black violence exists, the political violence of the 60′s is inconsequential or perhaps even justified?
That’s the thing about racists, they tend to respond to a hole by digging deeper.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

“Tough defending a party (DEMOCRAT) where a prerequisite to being elected is to have a “fleeting association” with the KKK according to Bill Clinton. He admits you HAD to be a RACIST to get elected as a DEMOCRAT”
And 60 years ago it would be true.
The Solid South as it was called, a near universal Democratic party governments in response to lingering anger over Reconstruction.
Of course, the Dixiecrats joined up with the GOP and it was the GOP which pursued the Southern Strategy which looked to capitalize on white anger and its the GOP which has been pursuing such a hostile governance against minorities, that African Americans vote 9 times out of 10 for the Democrat regardless of candidate or stance.
Hispanics are of course next on the GOP alienation check list.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

If a group of conservatives, carrying nightsticks, stood outside a polling station and intimidated black voters, do you think they should be arrested and charged with a violation of the law?

Posted by: Sigmonde | July 6, 2010, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Will this be on Good Morning America and the evening news? Why not?
Does the Obama Administration filter what is on the MSM?

Posted by: kyle | July 6, 2010, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Nice to see that Obama is fulfilling his oath to protect the citizens of the USA.
Looks like that depends on skin color or who you vote for.
When Holder said we are a nation of cowards about race he was talking about himself.

Posted by: ollie | July 6, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Bigots defending bigots. Since the bigots aren’t white it apparently ISN’T news….
And the media’s fall into irrelivance continues…

Posted by: CBA | July 6, 2010, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

this is not a color issue. it is a case of intimidation of voters. plain and simple. add this to the list of promoting of lawbreakers by the administration.

Posted by: dot | July 6, 2010, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Obama has done absolutely nothing to improve race relations in America.
With this Black Panther decision and the AZ lawsuit, Obama and Holder seems to willingly fan the flames of a potential race war.

Posted by: greg c | July 6, 2010, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

“Hispanics are of course next on the GOP alienation check list.” – Ryan C.
Only the ones wanting a Nanny State Free Hand Out are on that list Ryan buddy.
The majority of smart intelligent Hispanics who understand what it is to be an American vote conservative and wish to preserve our great Republic. Don’t sell them all short Ryan. Hispanics are capable of voting Anti-Democrat.

Posted by: Noz | July 6, 2010, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

“Adams testified that his superiors had stated that they had little interest in bringing cases against black defendants. “The section doesn’t want to protect white voters.” Adams said.” – ABC News
Huuummmmmmm . . . . .
This sounds like one of those race teachable moments Obama talked about early in his presidency. I’m sure he’ll get right on this one and have some sort of a beverage summit so that we can all learn what we are supposed to about race in America.
I can’t wait!
Maybe Holder can tell us something about being cowards.
Look how brave he was in dropping this case against the Black Panthers.

Posted by: Noz | July 6, 2010, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Equality Before the Law
Not
Equallity by the Law…
If two robed Klansmen had ben obstructing voters, if they had been within 100 feet of the entrance of a polling place they would STILL be in jail. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the NAACP and the ACLU would all be suing somebody.
To paraphrase Orwell, some are MORE equal than others based soley on the color of their skin.

Posted by: TravisPierce | July 6, 2010, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

“The majority of smart intelligent Hispanics who understand what it is to be an American vote conservative”
And since the majority of Hispanics vote Democrat it’s just another way of saying Hispanics aren’t very smart when in reality they’re alot smarter than the conservatives who think think they would be foolish enough to vote Republican.

Posted by: Skip | July 6, 2010, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

“And since the majority of Hispanics vote Democrat it’s just another way of saying Hispanics aren’t very smart ” – Skip
Smart is as smart does Skippy.
The reason a majority of Hispanics vote Democrat is that the Nanny State Free Hand Out is such an alluring thing it temporarily turns their brains into mush when they get in the voting booth and so they vote Democrat.
Now that you understand I hope you can be a bit more forgiving of them.

Posted by: Noz | July 7, 2010, 12:02 am 12:02 am

“If a group of conservatives, carrying nightsticks, stood outside a polling station and intimidated black voters”
It was called New Jersey in the 1980′s.
“Democrats claimed a Republican “ballot security” program in minority neighborhoods violated the federal Voting Rights Act. The program included using mailed sample ballots returned as undeliverable to compile lists of voters to be challenged at the polls and stationing off-duty police and sheriff’s officers near polling places.
The Republican National Committee chose to settle the 1981 suit by entering into the consent decree in November 1982.”
If no punishment and a promise not to do it anymore was good enough for the RNC, its good enough for the Black Panthers
BTW, the GOP was justed denied by a court as they sought to overturn the consent decree late last year.
Because its not like the right wing base is growing, so the alternative is voter suppression.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 12:03 am 12:03 am

“Only the ones wanting a Nanny State Free Hand Out are on that list Ryan buddy.”
Actually thanks to the racist right wing, the Dems may enjoy a Hispanic vote advantage 3 to 1 or even 4 to 1 advantage as opposed to 2 to 1.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 12:05 am 12:05 am

“The reason a majority of Hispanics vote Democrat is that the Nanny State Free Hand Out is such an alluring thing it temporarily turns their brains into mush when they get in the voting booth and so they vote Democrat.”
Wow I almost thought this was a namejack, its so blatantly racist.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 12:09 am 12:09 am

“Wow I almost thought this was a namejack, its so blatantly racist.” – Ryan C
Just following your lead Ryan and trying to make you feel comfortable here.
: o )

Posted by: Noz | July 7, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Everyone is getting worked up over one diehard liberal “RYAN”. The majority of people here agree it needs to be taken to court and the media and administration is trying to brush it under the rug. Ryan is just upset because this might not allow groups like Acorn, ACLU, Unions, and New Black Panthers alter the out come of election. That is one of the reasons they are for illegal immagrants and against photo ID’s at the poles.

Posted by: Steve | July 7, 2010, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Congradulation ABC for finnally coving this story. It has been one since 09 not just a couple weeks ago like others have suggested. Hope Obama dont get too mad at you, or you may be the next network to be treated as a non-news network. But hey at least you finnally reported it, I’m still waiting for CNN and others to follow suit. You wonder why fox is #1 in ratings….this is it. I hate having to watch one network most of the time, but I am looking for someone to report news, not feel good stories.

Posted by: Steve | July 7, 2010, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Where is Jimmy Carter when we need him…there is just no way to justify them not prosecuting these guys…there is video with them brandishing weapons. They are threatening people. What will happen in the next election? Whites wont be allowed to vote? Really if this was the other way around there would be such an uproar… there are 42 stories on this none of them with a main stream media except this blog… 1925 stories on Lindsey Lohan crying on the way to jail… why is the press ignoring this… can you imagine if this was Bush and Rove…. the fury would be all over the today show and cutie couric..sad state of affairs…. the DOJ drops this case but sues AZ…united we stand anyone remember those days….

Posted by: debra | July 7, 2010, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Bravo Debra

Posted by: Steve | July 7, 2010, 2:47 am 2:47 am

It has been reported that these thugs did threaten a republican who lived in the neighborhood…an elderly black man… they told him to stay home and not vote or he would be hurt…he was scared and stayed home… maybe the media might report on that… this is a real story and the media is ignoring it to protect Obama and Holder…WHY???? What does the media stand to gain by hiding the truth? I just do not understand this madness…Is it that they can not admit they were wrong about Obama?
thank you steve…

Posted by: debra | July 7, 2010, 3:02 am 3:02 am

I read that Lindsay said a F word and used the magic finger.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 7, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am

What was worse was when you told your friends that you were voting for the other side.. some of mine never got over it.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 7, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am

What is partisan about this?
I have seen the video. Why are private citizens standing outside a voting place wearing military uniforms and carry a night stick, claiming they are “security”.
Does anyone beleive for a moment that the DOJ would have dropped this case had it been white supremist or the KKK who were standing outside a voting site wearing their white hooded robes and holding night sticks?
If the black panthers can do this then the KKK has to also be allowed to do it.
I think the DOJ calls this “equal protection under the law”.
Or at least they used too! Under Holder the Black Panther’s doing it is now “freedom of speech” but the KKK doing it called a “hate crime”.

Posted by: Heather | July 7, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am

“You wonder why fox is #1 in ratings….this is it.”
FoxNews gets about half the audience that ABC news does.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Not right wingers, Ryan. Regular ole Americans of all stripes, colors and races do not want ANY domestic or international group (KKK or New Black Panthers) terrorizing us at the polls. Stop the nonsense and divisive politics of us and them. This is wrong. It’s wrong no matter if you are Conservative or Liberal, Democrat or Republican, Green or Progressive. “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” MLK

Posted by: Sensitive Sue | July 7, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am

ryanc…Your favorite color wouldn’t be black would it???? Soooo your justification for unlawful conduct/racist conduct is all about retribution done years ago, terrorizing people at the voting booth, by generations long gone??? So why try to move forward when people continue to refer to the past when giving excuses to commit uncivil and unlawful acts??? The more I read progressive agenda, the more I am persuaded of their goal of massive confusion …starting over if you will….

Posted by: Parallex View | July 7, 2010, 10:44 am 10:44 am

The case was dropped because there was no evidence of intimidation. One of the guys in the film was a poll watcher, the other one with a stick was moved along by the police. There was nobody who claimed they were intimidated, and there certainly isn’t any intimidation on the video.
Total non-issue. The biggest story in Philadelphia that day was that the poorer neighborhoods received few voting machines, and those broke down often. It was a difficult day to vote if you were poor.
The guy making these claims here is a GOP operative who was hired into civil rights by a guy who was using discriminatory hiring practices to recruit GOP operatives. He also has no evidence of any decision being made at civil rights on political grounds, he’s just being a tool.

Posted by: Flash Override | July 7, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am

I agree with Sue that voter intimidation should not be directed towards any groups. Black, Gray, or White Panthers have no business in obstructing the voting process.
Nor should the GOP have gotten away with their massive and blatant obstruction of predominantly African American voting districts in Florida during the 2000 elections. Not too surprisingly, the Voting Rights Division that Christian Adams worked in as a politicized appointee under Alberto Gonzales would only file two cases on behalf of AA voters, with one of them being a carryover from the Clinton administration. However, Mr. Adams is certainly adamant that the 2008 small scale incident with the Black Panthers is a serious and dangerous affront to the voting process.
I think it is, too. But I doubt if he and the GOP actually want the incident to be seriously pursued because that would be some serious tampering with a hornet’s nest of voting abuses. I’ll have to admit though that it does make god fodder against the administration and Democrats in the up and coming 2010 elections. It looks like the partisan influences in the media are running with it.

Posted by: jane | July 7, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Poll watcher!?!?!? LOL LOL LOL

Posted by: Parallex View | July 7, 2010, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Flash Overdrive, the case was won and going for sentencing. The lawyer, J. Christian Adams was not a GOP operative. Adams has a long and distinguished record with the DOJ and more DOJ officials are coming forward everyday to support and to corroborate Adams’ statements about the DOJ. Stop the goofy talking points. This was voter intimidation and it was wrong.

Posted by: Sensitive Sue | July 7, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

I wouldn’t say J. Christian Adams had either a long or distinguished career with the DOJ. He worked in a division of Voting Rights which largely ignored minority complaints, like the Minute Men brandishing handguns at Hispanics and the AA voting obstructions. He was hired in 2005 by Bradley Schlozman, who was found guilty in the Justice Department’s July 2008 internal investigation of hiring lawyers with conservative ideologies and political affiliations. Adams must have fit the bill for hiring being a longtime conservative activist. He stayed on until the middle of this year.
Standing in front of a voting area in uniform and carrying a club is an undeniable form of voting intimidation and there was some questionable caucusing going on with the Obama Democrats in 2008; neither should have happened. Nor should the GOP and their media allies seize upon one relatively small incident of intimidation as a major distraction, which only serves to polarize voters all the more. Not that the Democrats are taking a higher road.

Posted by: jane | July 7, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

“It was called New Jersey in the 1980′s.”
So, do you think it’s OK for conservatives to carry nightsticks to intimidate voters at polling stations, and not be arrested and charged with a criminal complaint? FYI, there is a difference between a civil complaint and a criminal complaint.

Posted by: Sigmonde | July 7, 2010, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Au contraire: the guy is a political operative, and you can read him on American Spectator.

Posted by: Flash Override | July 7, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

The case was not “won” – in fact, the case was never brought:
After reviewing the matter, the Civil Rights Division determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes. Nota bene: that is the Bush Justice Department, not under Obama.
Civil Rights Commissioner Arlan Melendez noted that “no citizen has even alleged that he or she was intimidated from voting,” which “was clear to the Justice Department last spring, which is why they took the course of action that they did.”
The complaints have come from white Republican poll watchers, who have given no evidence they were registered to vote in the majority black precinct.

Posted by: Flash Override | July 7, 2010, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

“The complaints have come from white Republican poll watchers, who have given no evidence they were registered to vote in the majority black precinct.”
Since when do citizens need to prove they are registered to vote in order to file a criminal complaint?

Posted by: Sigmonde | July 7, 2010, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

the civil case was won by default…the defendants did not show up. Lorraine King and her crew dismissed it after it was won.
To say there is no evidence is indeed blind justice. Look at the video..The guy has a BATON IN HIS HAND and is threatening people.
ANyway how would any one know what to believe since the media in general is ignoring the story and giving the DOJ a pass… Keep this up and one day this will knock on your door.
We have got to quit fighting amoung ourselves and get back to being the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…before it is too late…
the DOJ lets people who threaten vores go free and sues on of our own states for trying to protect our Borders…where does it end?
This makes no sense to let these people off the hook… what do you think they will do this year.. and why does the press ignore it?
There is VIDEO PROOF…if you cant see the truth with your own two eyes…then you just dont want to.

Posted by: debra | July 7, 2010, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

If the DOJ has a policy that says black defendants will not be prosecuted if the victims are white… are you really ok with that?
If this was Bush and Rove would you not be demanding and investigation? WOuld the Press not be all over it and talking about impeachment?
People need to wake up before it is too late….

Posted by: debra | July 7, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

“So, do you think it’s OK for conservatives to carry nightsticks to intimidate voters at polling stations, and not be arrested and charged with a criminal complaint”
That’s exactly what happened.
The RNC basically signed an agreement not to do ballot security without court permission.
So good enough for the RNC, good enough for the black panthers.
Of course the RNC was doing so on a very large scale affecting thousands of voters versus two knuckleheads playing dressup but hey its not like right wingers have any sense of scale or proportion.
You guys just know what FoxNews tells you to be angry about.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Good clarification, Flash Override. This occurred at an African American voting precinct. I’d forgotten the circumstances surrounding the incident.
They certainly weren’t positioned to intimidate African Americans as they came to vote. Hypothesis: Perhaps because of the past incidents of voting obstruction with minorities, they may have been there to guard for that.
It was pretty vigilante, though now I kind of wish that the DOJ would concede to Adam’s demands. I think he’s a two-bit player milking the incident for all he can get out of it, and the last thing he wants is the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ under his old bosses receiving attention for all their inaction and a rehash of past GOP obstruction with the voting process.

Posted by: jane | July 7, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

“Since when do citizens need to prove they are registered to vote in order to file a criminal complaint?”
I imagine in November there will be quite a bit of effort to depress Hispanic turnout, poll watchers challenging people’s legal status and registration.
Its the right wing way after all.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Honestly the Obama admistration makes Nixon look good… and the media today is beyond ridiculous… stonewalling takes on a whole new meaning in the year 2010
and just for the record I am not a republican… I am an American and I wish that we would all remmeber when that came first not all this bickering.

Posted by: debra | July 7, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Here’s what Abigail Thernstrom, conservative vice chairman of the Civil Rights Commission, wrote in “The New Black Panther Case: A Conservative Dissent,” published Tuesday in National Review:
“Forget about the New Black Panther Party case; it is very small potatoes. …In the 45 years since the act was passed, there have been a total of three successful prosecutions. The incident involved only two Panthers at a single majority-black precinct in Philadelphia. So far — after months of hearings, testimony and investigation — no one has produced actual evidence that any voters were too scared to cast their ballots. Too much overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges has been devoted to this case.”

Posted by: Tony A | July 7, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

The Democratic Party is supposed to be the party of getting the vote out and protecting voters’ rights.. it seems a bit stilted.. if you examine what they really want.
We have the audacity to criticize other countries’ election processes.. when ours has a history of being loose and inequitable.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 7, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Ya…flash is right, those white repubs need to stay on their own side…how dare they try to vote in a black precinct….

Posted by: Parallex View | July 7, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

ryancnoevil….”basically???” not REALLY the same thing as actual…I see you are wearing your black clothes and mask again….your comments reflect the common anarchist movement philosophy…..

Posted by: Parallex View | July 7, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Black flash mobs are targeting Asians in Philadelphia. The local police are refusing to call it these incidents hate crimes. The mayor has said that Asians being targeted by blacks is not hate, but economic crimes.
Whites and Asians in Philly are not protected. Mobs run wild.

Posted by: Karen | July 7, 2010, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

“ryancnoevil….”basically???” not REALLY the same thing as actual.”
So you saying the RNC did not sign a consent decree to settle a lawsuit against them for suppressing voters?
Or are you hopeful the RNC can once again suppress the votes of minorities?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Flash, the Washington Times reported that the Department of Justice had taken the “unprecedented” step of dropping a case which they had already won by default judgment.
Take it up with the Times…

Posted by: Sensitive Sue | July 7, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

This is a big deal–not because of the individual incident but because it signals a hyper-politicization of our legal system. If your politics, race, or social standing are not in line with those in power, watch out.

Posted by: Grandma | July 7, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

“Black flash mobs are targeting Asians in Philadelphia. The local police are refusing to call it these incidents hate crimes. The mayor has said that Asians being targeted by blacks is not hate, but economic crimes.”
What a shock that a right wingers has lied about a story.
Here is the ugly story of racial violence at a Philadelphia school and the probable source for the above exaggeration.
Philly Inquirer:”Having seen many of their classmates punched and beaten all day long, a group of Vietnamese students told teachers they feared walking home.
At the end of the school day Dec. 3, they left South Philadelphia High, backed by a group of adults including the principal, but still dreading what waited outside. Some ran ahead up Broad Street, separating the group of Vietnamese students from their escorts.
In moments, they crossed the street and were surrounded by assailants – mostly African American, but also Cambodian and white youths.
A crowd of more than 100 surrounded the Vietnamese students, who huddled together while dozens of attackers punched, pushed, and kicked them. A Cambodian female, repeatedly cited in the report, was the first to attack and described as the most violent.”

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

ryanc Simply cannot be compared to thugs brandishing night sticks spewing racially charged insults at American voters who want nothing more but the opportunity to vote without fear of getting their heads smashed in…If you cannot tell the difference well….wait for it….you truly do not understand nor appreciate our freedoms of diversity and opinions….Time to put it in drive and move forward rather than reverse….Unless of course, you want to see retribution carried out…

Posted by: Parallex View | July 7, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

“ryanc Simply cannot be compared to thugs brandishing night sticks spewing racially charged insults at American voters who want nothing more but the opportunity to vote without fear of getting their heads smashed in…If you cannot tell the difference well….wait for it….you truly do not understand nor appreciate our freedoms of diversity and opinion”
Its kind of sad that you walk around in fear of minorities thanks to the sensationalized and often false reporting of the right wing media.
“.Time to put it in drive and move forward rather than reverse….Unless of course, you want to see retribution carried out…”
Exactly.
So why are you so upset about a 2 year old incident that is only getting play because of the partisan manuveuring of the GOP?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

since this is a state run media blog – the correct answer is “it’s Bush’s fault!”

Posted by: Diogenes | July 7, 2010, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Liberal thy name is hypocrite. Clinton didn’t inhale or have sex, Kerry was in Cambodia, Gore invented the internet Edwards is a caring husband, Blogo didn’t try to sell the Senate seat, the media is not biased, East Anglia did nothing wrong, Hillary can’t recall what hapened to Vince Foster, New York Charlie’s taxes were an honest mistake, and the DOJ had good reason to dismiss this case. Wow! Really?

Posted by: preacherdan | July 8, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am

ryanc Why do you presume that I am NOT of minority class????

Posted by: Parallex View | July 8, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am

ABC News and all the other mainstream media have to stop this love affair with Obama and this administration.
Dismissal of this voter intimidation case is just one more example of our leadership leading us down the wrong road.
When are our news reporting agencies going to wake up and do what they they should be doing, reprot the news “ALL THE NEWS”
ABC, NBC, CBS and MSLSD should have been all over this story.
All I can say is when things turn around and this current regiem of soft tieranny falls the mainstream media won’t be far behind.

Posted by: Bob B. | July 8, 2010, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

“ryanc Why do you presume that I am NOT of minority class????”
Because women are the majority in this country?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 8, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

How is this NOT front page news? What Holder and the President have done to cover this story up is downright criminal. This administration is incompetent, criminal and corrupt to its very core.

Posted by: houstonative | July 8, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Perhaps wiser but certainly not the majority…

Posted by: Parallex View | July 8, 2010, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Do you think any media will start to report all the news or just keep reporting the filterd news… do they get their marching orders from the WH? Why is the News not the news anymore? What happend to journalism? It is really weird….

Posted by: debra | July 9, 2010, 1:06 am 1:06 am

okay one more thing… SO they let the russian spies go… they let the black panther guys go…. and they sue Arizona… does this make any sense?
And why does the media ignore it?

Posted by: debra | July 9, 2010, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Don’t Forget the New Healthcare CZAR!!Dr. Donald Berwick-He wants to ration care since Obamacare won’t be able to cover EVERYONE.
“This new healthcare czar will play a very important role in the implementation of the new ObamaCare law. Which explains why Obama chose to elevate Berwick to this new post without going through the usual Senate confirmation process, and also why he waited so long to make this move. This way there was no public hearing of Berwick’s nomination during the prolonged and contentious national debate over passage of the ObamaCare.”
DO WE HAVE ANY MEDIA? WHERE IS THE NEWS AND WHY AREN’T OUR REPORTERS AND JOURNALISTS DOING THEIR JOB? Robert Gibbs belittles any news agent that questions the government or he doesn’t answer their question.

Posted by: Lee | July 9, 2010, 4:00 am 4:00 am

Sense I’m hispanic, if for one reason or another I had to defend myself against the Panthers voting time, and get arrested, can I sue the Federal Government for Racial Profiling?
After all it’s a violation of civil rights, voting, or I can say they’re harrassing me for being Hispanic, in union with SB1070.

Posted by: Drop Charges | July 9, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Besides a knowledge of history; this is all you need to know:
“THEY CAME FIRST for the “domestic” terrorists” (right-wing conservatives; HR 1955),
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a “domestic” terrorist.
THEN THEY CONTROLLED the voting process (DOJ ignores NBPP intimidation)
And I didn’t speak up because I didn’t often vote.
THEN THEY CAME for the Christians and Jews (Obama: “we are not a Christian nation”;
Favors Hamas over Israel, HB 1388, and allows Iran to get nuclear weapons)
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Christian or a Jew.
THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up.”

Posted by: OneCitizen | July 9, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

this is news because of the leak, not the speculation that fox put out
this serious issue needs investigation not speculation by fox “news” freaks with the GOP agenda of pushing fear and hatred,, not unlike the new black panther party, hmmm?!!?! (like how i tied that in?)
i’m not a mega-fan of obama nor do i really think the media is just kissing his ass, and it’s really ridiculous and amazing to me for people to not be able to see that fox new, albeit private, is a propaganda machine for the right wing,
deuces!

Posted by: ml | July 11, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

The MSM needs to start REPORTING THE NEWS, instead of covering up for Obama and his APPOINTEES!! This will come back to bite the MSM… Do you wonder why people have ‘tuned out’? No news here!!

Posted by: Dee | July 11, 2010, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

ABC News has become a joke along with CBS and NBC. MSNBC is total propoganda and pathetic. CNN and FOX are the only two remaining agencies that do their best to report the REAL NEWS. Yes, Fox leans to the right in their opinion shows and CNN leans left in their opinion shows but both of these organizations do a pretty good job or reporting the news. It amazes me that the former majors along with MSNCB just flat out fail to report what is going on in our country, delete the news, or flat out lie in their reporting of incidents such as the Arizona Immigration law. Pathetic Jokes. I will continue to watch Fox, MSNBC and CNN because I like the variety but what is funny (ashame) is that you will see pretty much EVERYTHING on Fox, even the left leaning stories you see on MSNBC or CNN as they show most everything. The others thow simply fail to show what they don’t want to show and that is not journalism or news by any means.

Posted by: Ryan Otters | July 12, 2010, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

What really bothers me about this is—-if there wee white men standing with sticks dressed in militia-like outfits ranting slurs to black voters,,,you had better believe it would be all over the news and the DOJ would try the case with all the media fanfare. Classic reverse racism

Posted by: jan | July 13, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am

The office of civil rights is a joke. I believe the government needs to privitized these offices and have attorneys allegated with a certain amount of money, like they do doctors with health insurance, and a commission, like worker’s comp commission, to hear these cases. They way things are done is a waste of tax payer’s money. These agencies are control by individuals who tell them let this case past or through this one out. Evidence means nothing. Especially the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights. I know of a case when they had videos of a student being discriminated against and the school staff admitted yet they said not enough evidence. The schools don’t fear them. They laugh at them. While we pay.

Posted by: mike | July 26, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.