Obama Takes the Wheel
From Sunlen Miller
Presidents don’t usually drive themselves anywhere, but today – in a highly unusual move – President Obama got to drive.
Well, only 10 feet. But when you’re president that counts for something.
After touring a GM plant in Hamtramck, Michigan today – Mr. Obama stopped at the end of the assembly line and jokingly asked his secret service agent if he would allow him to get in and drive. After a few jokes – including one from his press secretary who quipped that he hoped the car has airbags since it had been so long since he’d driven – the consensus was that the president could drive.
The president got in a four door black Chevy Volt and drove for about 10 feet on the assembly line.
“I’m telling you guys, pretty smooth,” The president said with a big smile on his face getting out of the car.
Robert Gibbs told reporters afterward that this was a highly unusual event, but not unprecedented. The president has driven once before as president – when he visited a Secret Service training facility in April of this year, and drove a Dodge Charger at a closed-press event.
"We probably have to restart the heart of Vic who seemed less than thrilled,” Gibbs joked of Obama’s lead secret service agent today, "Its been awhile.”
A White House official says that other than that one time previously the president has not driven since he got Secret Service protection in the spring of 2007.
The president’s last car was a Ford Escape Hybrid – the lease was up so it was turned back in, a white House official says.
-Sunlen Miller
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Presidents don’t usually drive themselves anywhere, but today – in a highly unusual move – President Obama got to drive.
========
President Bush drove himself around his ranch all the time.
Posted by: MayBee | July 30, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
“President Obama got to drive.
Well, only 10 feet. But when you’re president that counts for something.” – ABC News
No it doesn’t.
Posted by: Noz | July 30, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
He wasn’t driving an Army tank with a helmet on.. hopefully..
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 30, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
“The president got in a four door black Chevy Volt and drove for about 10 feet on the assembly line.
“I’m telling you guys, pretty smooth,” The president said with a big smile on his face getting out of the car.”
It should be, it’s a ridiculous $41,000!! And I’m sure that is the basic no frills package. that’s more expensive than a BMW 3-series, Mercedes C-class, 10 grand more than a Nissan Maxima and 20 grand more than a Honda Accord.
Posted by: J.R. | July 30, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Here sure took the wheel all right. Read this from Minnesota and the Federal Reserves 9th District.”the Ninth Fed district puts the blame for the credit freeze flatly where it belongs: the president himself, and more specifically his destructive economic advisors. “The most-cited reasons—though only by a small margin—were organizational uncertainty about future financial system reforms and regulatory restrictions on bank lending. A Minnesota institution stated flatly, “The regulatory environment has impacted our willingness to make loans.”
Posted by: pauldia | July 30, 2010, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
It would seem a perfect vehicle for a carrot harvester with a subprime sixty month auto loan.
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 30, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
“Read this from Minnesota and the Federal Reserves 9th District.”
Except one should read the whole article (which reports on a survey)directly versus the the taint of the right wing lens which takes things out of context.
The article is called “Come and get it–please” by Ronald Wirtz
“The most-cited reasons—though only by a small margin—were organizational uncertainty about future financial system reforms and regulatory restrictions on bank lending”
Gee that sounds bad until you read it in context
“Those reporting a decline in credit to small business were also asked about the underlying source. The reasons cited for tight credit were all over the map, including a decline in demand and sagging creditworthiness among small businesses.
The most-cited reasons—though only by a small margin—were organizational uncertainty about future financial system reforms and regulatory restrictions on bank lending. A Minnesota institution stated flatly, “The regulatory environment has impacted our willingness to make loans.”
Not all respondents felt that way about the role of regulators, however. The percentage of respondents saying regulator influence was the most important factor for the decline in small business lending (27 percent) was slightly lower than those saying it had no role or influence (29 percent).”
Posted by: Ryan C | July 30, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
“President Bush drove himself around his ranch all the time.”
Excellent point.
Its nice that he was able to drive during the year and 3 months he spent there.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 30, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Sometimes referred to as a ‘Windshield Cowboy’ 43 checked out the north 40 acres.. 40-11 times.
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 30, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
The same businesses that demanded the U.S. gov’t. bail them out.. are the same that want protected gross margins and tax relief.. the ones who took the money and mismanaged risk.. should probably remain silent .. at least for the next year or two
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 30, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
I didn’t run for president to shill for an auto company but this baby is smooth, like me.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | July 30, 2010, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Big deal does he know how to drive,since he doesen:t know anything else.
Posted by: Raymond | July 30, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
The Car-Salesman-in-Chief is taking us all for a ride.
Posted by: Bob | July 30, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
“After a few jokes – including one from his press secretary who quipped that he hoped the car has AIRBAGS”
.
It did once oBama got in it.
Posted by: gk | July 30, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Jake really is scraping the bottom of the barrel with this crud.
Posted by: tanarg | July 30, 2010, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
And this car can be yours for only $488.09 a month for 7 years with no money down and no credit check. Come in! Stop by! Nobody beats our deals!. Obama Motors wants YOU!
Posted by: BigGuy | July 30, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
“And this car can be yours for only $488.09 a month for 7 years with no money down and no credit check.” – BigGuy
Wow! Does include replacing the battery twice which is what you’ll need to do in seven years. A battery pack will cost you $8,000.00. Also does Obama Motors come to your home so that you can get a quicky battery charger installed? You know the one which will charge the car in 4 hours instead of 10.
Posted by: Noz | July 30, 2010, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Kissin’ O’ the babies and Kickin’ O’ the tires.. all a Day O’ work in the Life O’ the consummate politician.
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 30, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
“Who will buy it?”
Almost all of my friends want to buy an all-electric car. We’re sick to death of pumping gas all the time and watching either our money go out of the country or oil pouring into our waters, we’re sick of the check[book]-engine light, and we’re literally sick of breathing smog.
Posted by: Skip | July 30, 2010, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
“Almost all of my friends want to buy an all-electric car.” – Skip
Wow Skip, you have rich well to do friends!
Good for you.
Posted by: Noz | July 30, 2010, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
$41,000 for a car that can go 40 miles before needing a recharge ,that ought to cut down on travel. CFL energy light bulbs when broken release mercury into the environment. Obama has really bought in to the UNs’ Agenda 21 and puppet master George Soros.
Posted by: Downwithsocialism | July 30, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
He slammed the republicans for voting against AMERICAN CARS AND THE PEOPLE WHO MAKES THEM!!!!!I just can’t imagine a country as “great” as America without manufacturing! The comments posted here, just reminds me of the “blind that led the blind” into thinking that America and IT’S PEOPLE ARE WORTHLESS. Just think for one moment~ what have you gained in over 3 decades…a Service based job market, no manufacturing of ANY thing, wages stagnated, No Healthcare or Dental, crumbling infrastructure, no high speed rails to accommodate commuters back and forth to work, and Americans sent off to fight in hostile countries FOR OIL, an Economy system built on LIES and FRAUD….Instead of bashing the President, pull together to make this country great for ALL Americans, not the top 2%. You’re even believing the “propaganda” that they deserve their huge TAX cuts, because they will create jobs. Well, did they? Obviously they didn’t! Stop being anger and being a sucker for the republicans lies! They care about Themselves. Not you, me or this country!
Posted by: sara | July 30, 2010, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
A friend of mine has a Morris Mini – all electric — no “backup motor” gets 120 miles per charge — has awesome acceleration…
But his house is powered by solar panels, and his car is charged by solar panels… so cheap energy, esp. since he doesn’t pay the usual road tax we pay at the pump…
Since he works locally, his car is sufficient for his needs…
Posted by: Quo Warranto? | July 30, 2010, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Maxine Waters.Charley Rangel.Ethics.
Posted by: bobmac | July 30, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Wonder if Jon Carry’s new $7 Mil yatch has the Chevy Volt drive train and battery system to spin the prop when the wind doesn’t blow?T
Posted by: gk | July 30, 2010, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
“Almost all of my friends want to buy an all-electric car.” – Skip
Wow Skip, you have rich well to do friends!
Good for you.
Posted by: Noz | Jul 30, 2010 8:04:11 PM
Yeah, me too Skip! I’ve been waiting since the Jetsons first came out. Too bad technology can’t move as fast as our wishes. If the auto makers and union workers/leaders that Obama bows to had concentrated on real change instead of lining their pockets we might be driving in them right now. But I’m happy to see that Obama bailed everyone out so the same union workers could get their benefits and retirement plans paid up!
Posted by: MM | July 30, 2010, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Posted by: sara | Jul 30, 2010 9:34:17 PM
I love it when liberals rant and then tell us not to be angry.
Posted by: MM | July 30, 2010, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Lots of boasting about Chrysler hiring 1100 workers to meet demands of the new Jeep Grand Cherokee. Arn’t we fighting against the big gas guzzler? 16 City / 23 Highway and no hybrid? But suddenly with Obama in office, this is not only acceptable but something to boast about. My how perspectives change.
Posted by: MM | July 30, 2010, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
I had no idea the moron could even pass a driver’s license exam…
Posted by: Namako | July 30, 2010, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
If I were to buy an American car, it would be for the only things that count… Big and Powerful… a gas guzzling behemoth.. thank you.
Posted by: Quo Warranto? | July 31, 2010, 12:06 am 12:06 am
I had no idea the moron could even pass a driver’s license exam…
Posted by: Namako | Jul 30, 2010 11:59:21 PM
Do you have to show your birth certificate to get a driver’s license? Just askin”.
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 12:48 am 12:48 am
I don’t know who else would buy that thing. Real men have to have a thundering exhaust note vice a hummmmm!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | July 31, 2010, 12:54 am 12:54 am
So glad to see O having a good time while illegal immigrants die in the desert afterr crossing his open border. I guess he’s playing the odds. Even if half make it and get registered, he’s still ahead of the game.
It would be nice to see all the protestors showing concern over human rights to show even a little bit of concern for those dying out there in the heat. Why aren’t these activists down at the border warning those who cross that they might die in the heat seeking a better way of life. Some human rights activists they are.
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 1:09 am 1:09 am
What a weanie bureaucrat. Have you ever seen Obama throw a pitch? Nowhere near the plate. Have you ever seen Obama on a bike with his mom pants and retrofitted OSHA approved, ANSI tested helmet? Oh, let me guess, all you liberals are going trip over yourselves in his defense to say “it’s the law!”. Typical, overlegislating liberals defending weanie leaders.
Posted by: EPU | July 31, 2010, 1:23 am 1:23 am
“If the auto makers and union workers/leaders that Obama bows to had concentrated on real change instead of lining their pockets we might be driving in them right now”
Trying to blame the suppression of the electric car on Obama is the same old weak transposition. If any political forces worked against the marketing of an all-electric car it was the Bush administration who had major ties to Big Oil. There is no such thing as a perfect market. This product has been withheld from consumers by powerful business forces who didn’t want us to be able to buy them because they wanted us to buy products that would generate them higher profits, namely big junkie gas guzzling SUVs. It had nothing to do with technology being inadequate either….the average American only drives something like 25 miles a day. Anybody genuinely interested may watch “Who Killed the Electric Car”…it does offer both sides of the tale. But there is going to be a sequel: “Revenge of the Electric Car”.
Posted by: Skip | July 31, 2010, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Good to see ABC Pravda at work. This is news? Oh, my.
Jour-O-List, signing off.
Posted by: jeff | July 31, 2010, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
The President drove 10 feet… Then he needed to charge it up again!
Ba-da-bing!
Not bad for 41 grand.
Posted by: kevin | July 31, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Posted by: Skip | Jul 31, 2010 8:53:44 AM
I’ve seen the movie Skip. So you’re saying big unions had no influence on forcing automakers to sell big SUVs with big profits to keep upwith the big union addiction? It was mainly Bush and big oil? Wow. bush sure had a lot of influence back in the 70s and 80s and 90s when he wasn’t even President! I do not deny the role oil has played in this drama, but you can’t deny the role out of control unions have played either. And Obama represents being beholden to unions as much as Bush does to big oil.
As far as the future of the electric car goes, I think we are already pushing the limits of the electric battery. Hence the fake electric car that is really a hybrid being sold as an electric car – subsidized by bailouts, buy backs, rebates, or whatever the latest scheme is to misuse our tax dollars.
I laugh when I see Chrysler adding jobs to produce their new Jeep Grand Cherokee with it’s non-hybrid 16/23mpg rating. Is that The Revenge of the SUV?
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
the average American only drives something like 25 miles a day.
A source would be nice, skip, and a date. And does the electric car use power while sitting in traffic? Generalizing statistics is not helpful. Btw, my commute is 90 miles round trip. What’s yours? I can’t remember the last time I had a commute under 50 miles RT.
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“I laugh when I see Chrysler adding jobs to produce their new Jeep Grand Cherokee with it’s non-hybrid 16/23mpg rating”
Nobody’s ignoring the popularity of SUVs, the point is if you want to drive an SUV you can still get one, but if you want to drive an electric car you can’t, even though they were making them back in the ’90s.
Posted by: Skip | July 31, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
“Generalizing statistics is not helpful”
What…are you demanding an exact estimate?
Posted by: Skip | July 31, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Skip, I laugh about the Chrysler announcement because it is touted in the framework of government bringing jobs back to America in stark contrast to their vilfyingy the SUV as a gas guzzler. They are willing to sacrifice their high ground to latch onto a headline about jobs. It is laughable.
I’m not demanding an exact estimate. A source and a date for your number would be nice.
And btw, no reply on the affect unions have had on the auto industry and how Obama is beholden to them as much as Bush was to big oil? And if Obama is Mr. Electric, why is he bowing to the Saudi’s? Why doesn’t he increasae domestic oil production until electric cars have been mainstreamed? If he has such clout as to create or save millions of jobs and rescue the auto industry, can’t he satisfy our current demand for oil AND push forward on electric cars?
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
But there is going to be a sequel: “Revenge of the Electric Car”.
Posted by: Skip | Jul 31, 2010 8:53:44 AM
Big question: Have you ordered your Chevy Volt yet, Skip?
The truth now.
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
But there is going to be a sequel: “Revenge of the Electric Car”.
Posted by: Skip | Jul 31, 2010 8:53:44 AM
Big question: Have you ordered your Chevy Volt yet, Skip?
The truth now.
Posted by: MM | Jul 31, 2010 2:40:30 PM
Tick tock.
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I soldiered on through the idiotic SUV craze with an old Honda Civic that gets about 40mpg and still has a couple years left in it I hope. When it’s done I want to buy an electric car.
Posted by: Skip | July 31, 2010, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
I soldiered on through the idiotic SUV craze with an old Honda Civic that gets about 40mpg and still has a couple years left in it I hope. When it’s done I want to buy an electric car.
Posted by: Skip | Jul 31, 2010 4:02:04 PM
I see, so all this time, you’ve been supporting a foreign import and not buying any new domestic cars – big or small. Interesting that you pronounce the revenge of the electric car – yet you haven’t ordered one yourself.
I’ve been running a Hyundai Accent for the past 6 years that also gets 40mpg on the highway, and I also own a Santa Fe. I’d love to be George Jetson, but I’m not supporting auto unions. Unions had their purpose, but they have gone astray thanks to greedy workers and leaders. I’ll buy foreign first unless it’s domestic non-union.
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
I soldiered on through the idiotic SUV craze
Posted by: Skip | Jul 31, 2010 4:02:04 PM
BTW, skip, SUVs can be a viable way to transport large families. But I agree it got out of hand. Not my favorite image to see a single driver in a big SUV. We are not always reasonable and responsible. But it doesn’t mean the idea is necessarily idiotic.
And while yes the automakers used it to their advantage, it was partially to keep up with union demands. Making small cars at a loss had to be made up for somewhere.
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
There is a country song, “Jesus takes the wheel”. To my knowledge, Jesus was never a liar.
Posted by: young_voter | July 31, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Will [insert politician here] drive a Volt?
Posted by: MM | July 31, 2010, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
I don’t expect anybody to buy a piece of junk just because it has a Made in America sticker on it, I want international competition, but at the same time I’m not union-phobic either. If corporations had a historic standard policy of treating workers fairly there wouldn’t be unions. They did not and in many cases still do not.
Posted by: Skip | July 31, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
“Will [insert politician here] drive a Volt?”
I think this question is less relevant than “Will [insert name here] drive an all electric car by [date]?”
You’re implying the future of the electric car rides on the Volt while I think the future of the electric car is inevitable….they hold almost all the advantages in the long run.
Posted by: Skip | July 31, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
“while I think the future of the electric car is inevitable” – Skip
Skip, I bet the electric car will go the way of 8 track tapes.
Biofuels will most likely be what we all use in 10 to 15 years.
Bioengineering is really making strides.
Posted by: Noz | July 31, 2010, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Betamax was better than VHS, but most of us know what happened to THAT debate.
Posted by: Namako | August 1, 2010, 1:15 am 1:15 am
“I think the future of the electric car is inevitable….they hold almost all the advantages in the long run.”
The self charging hybrid such as Prius or Volt is certainly a good idea. All-electric vehicles that require charging stations and have limited range will fall by the wayside. There are too many disadvantages associated with all-electric vehicles over hybrids.
Posted by: Sigmonde | August 1, 2010, 6:06 am 6:06 am
There was a time when buying a trash compactor was the ‘green’ thing to do.. even before recycling was common place. Then, we wanted to have a compost pile.. which people never seemed to keep bad stuff out of. I had a 1200cc Toyota in 1973.. it was very fuel efficient..but I couldn’t fit in it now. We also had a time when people were encouraged to have one or two kids.. don’t hear that anymore. And then there was the return to cloth diapers.
Posted by: Dontget818 | August 1, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
but at the same time I’m not union-phobic either. If corporations had a historic standard policy of treating workers fairly there wouldn’t be unions. They did not and in many cases still do not.
Posted by: Skip | Jul 31, 2010 7:49:55 PM
I have already stated that unions had their place in restricting widespread failures of greed in the past. But they became greedy themselves and are now meddling in areas where they have no business.
Once again, skip, your statement “and in many cases, they still do” is without specifics. What cases are you speaking of?
Posted by: MM | August 1, 2010, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Republicans would prefer regular people be happy with whatever wage scraps the wealthy and the corporate throw their way.
The incomes of the wealthy have increased hundreds fold in recent decades. The rest of us very little increase.
This is what the Republican party fights for . .
Posted by: Danton | Aug 1, 2010 6:09:14 PM
Ah yes, the communist viewpoint. The Republican Party fights for more than what you say. But I know it fits nicely into your viewpoint. And greed is not a political party. Let’s look at the hundreds of trial lawyers who have passed through the halls of Congress with a (D) at the end of their name. Let’s look at John Kerry, for example.
Corporations for centuries have provided pathways for people to rise above their economic circumstances and improve their lives through hard work and promotions. This is impossible with the union/socialist/communist system.
My sister was a nurse for about 40 years and she finally gave up trying to improve her situation because it didn’t matter how hard or not hard you tried. The nurses union leveled the playing field and career motivation was eliminated.
With few exceptions, I have improved my situation over the past 40 years and now earn (in just salary) twice as much as I did just 8 years ago – and I have a regular office job with some technical expertise thrown in. My father is amazed at my hourly rate from when he worked. I’m sure I have far outpaced the cost of living.
If you are taking the scraps, that’s your problem. Try applying yourself. Education, trade, promotion, whatever it takes. Just don’t sit around a whine. You don’t have to be a millionaire to be happy. And you can’t life down to a couple of talking points. Use your brain, apply reasoning, and think for yourself. It’s the gift you’ve been given.
Posted by: MM | August 1, 2010, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
“If you are taking the scraps, that’s your problem”
Lots of people are taking the scraps right now. But why should we surprised by such arrogance from somebody offering the same old Wealth=Success argument along with heroic tales of nosing one’s way up the corporate ladder one seat-cushion at a time.
Posted by: Skip | August 2, 2010, 8:46 am 8:46 am
“If you are taking the scraps, that’s your problem”
Lots of people are taking the scraps right now. But why should we surprised by such arrogance from somebody offering the same old Wealth=Success argument along with heroic tales of nosing one’s way up the corporate ladder one seat-cushion at a time.
Posted by: Skip | Aug 2, 2010 8:46:32 AM
Let me guess, skip. We should all grow our own gardens and call our kids Moonbeam. I lived through the hippie phase. It got old.
It’s not arrogance skip. I contract my skills and have since 2001. I’m a small business owner. So that pretty much blows your assumptions about me out of the water. I was out of work for five months so i’ve just been there done that. Most of my contracts run three to twelve months so I have to keep on my toes, improving my skill set, and marketing myself. It takes a positive attitude and extra work as I am in my 50′s. But I do it and most of the time, I suceed.
We all choose our path in lfe, skip. To sit around worrying about what the fat cats are up to is self indulgent crap. Fat cats have been around in one fashion or another throughout history. Many times, they are part of the government you apparently think will make everything feel ok for you. What a waste of a perfectly good time spent here on mother earth. If you feel so strongly about beating back the forces of evil, run for office. Do something about it.
Posted by: MM | August 2, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am
” wealth = success”
Skip, what part of my statement, ” You don’t have to be a millionaire to be happy” describes wealth =success?
And any thoughts on my sister’s experience with the failure of the nurses union to instill self improvement amomgst its member? Didn’t think so.
Posted by: MM | August 2, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am
“To sit around worrying about what the fat cats are up to is self indulgent crap”
Baloney!….we have to worry about what the fat-cats are up to 24/7 because 24/7 they’re up to trying to make themselves fatter at the expense of everybody else. Greed seems to have no bounds. And one of the major ways fat-cats make themselves fatter is getting their Republican stooges elected to turn over control of the government to the fat-cats so they can undermine the government by dismantling regulations and cutting their own taxes hamstringing the government financially. There are no such things as perfect markets which is why fat-cats can manipulate them to rip everybody else off. Why are monopolies illegal? -because they’re UNFAIR. Who decides what’s fair? -we do via government, because an economy can’t exist if its transactions are perceived as unfair.
Posted by: Skip | August 2, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
The Republican Party fights for more than what you say.
——-//
What exactly do they fight for? And what is their record? And how do you respond to David Stockman’s op-ed in the NYT? Or Edward Luce’s piece on the middle class in the Financial Times? Or The Nation’s series on Inequality in America?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 2, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
“Baloney!….we have to worry about what the fat-cats are up to 24/7 because 24/7 they’re up to trying to make themselves fatter at the expense of everybody else. Greed seems to have no bounds.” – Skip
Gee Skip I didn’t know you were worrying about Pro Atheletes, Movie Stars, Rock Stars and Rappers, Talk Show Hosts, and News Anchors 24/7.
Posted by: Noz | August 2, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
It’s funny how much big businessmen just hate it when entertainers make as much money as they do.
Posted by: Skip | August 2, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
You misspoke Skip.
Allow me to fix your sentence for you.
It’s funny how much Liberals and Progressives just hate it when entertainers make as much money as big businessmen do.
Posted by: Noz | August 2, 2010, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
“The Republican Party fights for more than what you say”
Like Terri Schiavo and limited government interference in our lives.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Posted by: Skip | Aug 2, 2010 9:53:39 AM
So tell me Skip, what have you done lately to keep the fat cats in check? Other than vote, that is. Post comments on a blog? Get real.
I’ll be waiting for your response…
And Ryan, you have become an irrelevant one liner. Yawn.
Posted by: MM | August 2, 2010, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
What exactly do they fight for? And what is their record? And how do you respond to David Stockman’s op-ed in the NYT? Or Edward Luce’s piece on the middle class in the Financial Times? Or The Nation’s series on Inequality in America?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | Aug 2, 2010 9:53:45 AM
What are you all so worried about? Do your job, enjoy your family and your community. Life’s too short to be worrying about the top 1% that are going to find ways to be rich no matter what anyone does. You’re just spitting in the wind and getting it all over yourself.
Posted by: MM | August 2, 2010, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Incomes for the top 5% have gone up hugely. For the rest of us, we’re barely holding our own.
Posted by: sylviatravis | Aug 2, 2010 4:02:07 PM
I’m sure you’d be surprised at how far you could actually fall. Are you homeless? Are you scrounging around a garbage dump? Obviously not since you’re using a computer on the Internet. Count your blessings, thenmove forward and improve your life. Quit whining.
Posted by: MM | August 2, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Life’s too short to be worrying about the top 1% that are going to find ways to be rich no matter what anyone does. You’re just spitting in the wind and getting it all over yourself.
Posted by: MM | Aug 2, 2010 10:11:37 PM
I don’t see one answer to any of these questions: What exactly do they (Republicans) fight for? And what is their record? And how do you respond to David Stockman’s op-ed in the NYT? Or Edward Luce’s piece on the middle class in the Financial Times? Or The Nation’s series on Inequality in America?
But go to it with your own spitting in the wind. Its National Clown Week.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 2, 2010, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Amazing…..Obama sitting in the Volt electric car with a BIG GRIN on his face spouting “green” as a way to lift us out of the economic slump with green sector jobs..A car that costs $41,000.00 dollars, who not enough people can afford to buy on a massive scale with our present state of the economy, …has a maximum range of 40 miles, average commuting time of 26 minutes one way, with an 8 hour recharge time….And…wait for it…THEY WONDER WHY…..
Posted by: Parallex View | August 3, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am