By Dschabner

Jul 6, 2010 8:35pm

President Obama to Make Recess Appointment of CMS Administrator Republicans Attacking as ‘Expert on Rationing’

With Congress officially on recess, President Obama will on Wednesday use his ability to make recess appointments to name one of his more controversial nominees: Donald Berwick, nominee to be Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

The April nomination of Berwick — president and chief executive officer of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement — was in trouble and might not have been able to meet Senate confirmation due to comments Berwick made in the past about rationing health care. Even if Berwick could have been confirmed by the Senate, Democrats have little appetite for another round of fighting about changes to the health care system, Democrats said.

In an interview last year with Biotechnology Healthcare, Berwick said society makes decisions about rationing all the time, and that the "decision is not whether or not we will ration care — the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open. And right now, we are doing it blindly."

He has also praised the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which he said had "developed very good and very disciplined, scientifically grounded, policy-connected models for the evaluation of medical treatments from which we ought to learn."

Said Berwick, "You can say, 'Well, we shouldn’t even look.' But that would be irrational. The social budget is limited — we have a limited resource pool. It makes terribly good sense to at least know the price of an added benefit, and at some point we might say nationally, regionally, or locally that we wish we could afford it, but we can’t. We have to be realistic about the knowledge base."

Berwick said the degree to which the knowledge base is "linked directly to policy and decision is a matter of choice. You could make it advisory, or you could make it mandatory, or you could make it a policy rule. But to remain ignorant of the cost implications of a drug that is marginally better than what is already out there is simply bad policy."

Because of these comments and others, Berwick was criticized by conservatives, with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, calling him an “expert on rationing.” The Republican Policy Committee sought to directly tie Berwick's praise of the UK's NICE with some of the more troubling testimonials against the UK system.

In response to these and similar criticisms, a number of physicians' groups and health care organizations wrote a letter on Berwick's behalf, saying "Unfortunately, some of Dr. Berwick’s speeches and writings have been quoted in ways that misrepresent his beliefs. Specifically, it has been suggested that Dr. Berwick is an advocate of health care rationing and that he in some way supports the government making health care decisions that should be made by patients and their doctors. This misrepresentation does a disservice to Dr. Berwick who has a long history as a leader in promoting patient-centered care."

Berwick, they said, "has consistently prioritized patients’ needs and preferences not only through his best practice initiatives, but also by teaching health professionals how to put patients at the center of health care decision- making through IHI’s health professions training work. In short, Dr. Berwick’s commitment to patient-centered care is about putting control of health care decisions in the hands of informed patients and their families, working in partnership with their physicians."

White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer posted on his blog this evening that many "Republicans in Congress have made it clear in recent weeks that they were going to stall the nomination as long as they could, solely to score political points. But with the agency facing new responsibilities to protect seniors’ care under the Affordable Care Act, there’s no time to waste with Washington game-playing."

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services oversees approximately one third of all health care spending in the United States, more than $800 billion. Becker's nomination had been endorsed by President George W. Bush's two CMS administrators, Mark McClellan and Tom Scully, the American Hospital Association, the AARP, and others.

Obama has used his Constitutional ability to make recess appointments for a few other controversial nominees, including labor attorney Craig Becker, now on the National Labor Relations Board, and Chai Feldblum, now on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

At this point in his presidency, President Bush had made 15 recess appointments. Obama's actions Wednesday will bring his total to 18. White House officials argued that Obama has a total of 189 nominees pending before the Senate, with almost half of them pending for more than three months. 

President Bush, a White House official said, "was not facing the same level of obstruction.  Twenty-eight of President Obama’s nominees have been held on the Senate floor for more than three months. At this point in the Bush administration, only six of his nominees had been waiting that long."

UPDATE: Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., called the recess appointment "an insult to the American people. Dr. Berwick is a self-professed supporter of rationing health care and he won't even have to explain his views to the American people in a Congressional hearing. Once again, President Obama has made a mockery of his pledge to be accountable and transparent."

User Comments

Rationing already exists and is prevalent.
If you’re healthy and can pay, you will get excellent care.
If you’re no longer healthy or you cannot pay, your care is rationed.
Right wingers are fine with this arrangement provided they are not the ones without insurance or with a pre-existing condition.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Amen Ryan!

Posted by: Gail | July 6, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

“If you are no longer healthy or you cannot pay,your care is rationed”-prove it. In reality the health care system is going broke precisely because unhealthy patients are getting intensive medical care,regardless of prognosis or ability to pay.If you present to an ER critically ill you will receive the best care in the world whether you can pay for it or not. The problem is that someone else(everybody else)pays for it.Failure to provide care would lead to a lawsuit,attempted dumping is against the law.

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Wow, poor Obama – he can’t seem to catch a break… Maybe the problem is the nominees, not the process?! I like how the White House Communications Director ‘just knows’ it is all about scoring political points – kinda like holding back border security to get comprehensive immigration reform? If GOP is only motivated by political motives, they are only following the model set by the administration…
How do recess appointments get rescinded?

Posted by: N2vip | July 6, 2010, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

This is just another example of this administration’s fear of democracy.They don’t want to let CNN cover the fiasco in the Gulf(“we are not the enemy”),they don’t care about what the public wants about health care,they are afraid that even the overwhelmingly Democrat congress MIGHT ASK SOME QUESTIONS of this supporter of socialized medicine.

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

“In reality the health care system is going broke precisely because unhealthy patients are getting intensive medical care,regardless of prognosis or ability to pay”
Yes for MediCare which does not exclude people based on a pre-existing condition, some 2 years end of life care eats up an absurd portion of the overall budget.
Private insurance drops people when they start actually collecting benefits they paid for.
Reauters: “Their health insurance carriers were subsidiaries of WellPoint, which has 33.7 million policyholders — more than any other health insurance company in the United States.
The women paid their premiums on time. Before they fell ill, neither had any problems with their insurance. Initially, they believed their policies had been canceled by mistake.
They had no idea that WellPoint was using a computer algorithm that automatically targeted them and every other policyholder recently diagnosed with breast cancer. The software triggered an immediate fraud investigation, as the company searched for some pretext to drop their policies, according to government regulators and investigators.
Once the women were singled out, they say, the insurer then canceled their policies based on either erroneous or flimsy information. WellPoint declined to comment on the women’s specific cases without a signed waiver from them, citing privacy laws.”
Maybe you can stop looking for Obama’s kindergarten records for a minute and do a little research.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

More on those private insurance companies who don’t dump patients according to Nephron,
“The disclosures come to light after a recent investigation by Reuters showed that another health insurance company, Assurant Health, similarly targeted HIV-positive policyholders for rescission. That company was ordered by courts to pay millions of dollars in settlements.”

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Ryan C, your post is so blatantly false it is laughable. You do realize that when you make comments like that you are accusing the doctors, nurses, surgeons, etc. of refusing to do the job they took an oath to do. Regardless of insurance or not, you WILL get care. If it were true, as your post would lead people to believe, lawyers across America would be getting even richer than they already are with lawsuits of malpractice and/or wrongful death, pain and suffering from lack of care, and so on. No one in this country is refused care because they do not have insurance. For goodness sake, even prison inmates get medical attention when needed.
How about you give us some back up to your claims. I’ve noticed the liberals who post here are always wanting “concrete proof”, so we’ll turn the tables this time.

Posted by: Shoe | July 6, 2010, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

“No one in this country is refused care because they do not have insurance.”
This is a convenient fiction believed by those who face the cognitive dissonance of a guilty conscience.
IN fact, there are people refused care every day because they can’t afford it. Hospitals in some cases are required to provide care in an emergency – something that can have a wide variety of definitions. No hospital has any obligation to treat non-emergency medical problems, no matter how severs, until they become emergencies – by which time it is usually too late.

Posted by: Flash Override | July 6, 2010, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Flash,give us one example of someone denied care after coming to an ER.You can be an illegal alien with no insurance and go to an ER with active TB and get admitted,treated,set up for rehab and outpatient therapy-and be hospitalized for months.Your claim is baloney.

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Donald Berwick, Rationer-in-Chief. Let’s see who was it that said Obamacare did not include rationing?

Posted by: Ed Taylor | July 6, 2010, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

“I’ve noticed the liberals who post here are always wanting “concrete proof”, so we’ll turn the tables this time.”
One of the frustrations liberals have with the healthcare bill compromise is that it did not come out strongly enough against the practice of dumping patients who get ill.
Google will find you plenty of examples
“A man needing urgent medical care was misdiagnosed by a doctor and denied treatment due to lack of health insurance, which led to his tragic and avoidable death. The lawsuit filed on behalf of 56-year-old Marcus Murray and his wife, versus the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, went to federal court March 2, 2010, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer”

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

If it were true, as your post would lead people to believe, lawyers across America would be getting even richer than they already are with lawsuits of malpractice and/or wrongful death, pain and suffering from lack of care, and so on.”
BTW, I have to compliment you on your effort to shift my attack from insurance companies (which everyone loathes) to doctors before placing blame on greedy lawyers.
The lengths the right wing goes to to defend their corporate masters…..

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

“no hospital has any obligation to treat non-emergency medical problems,no matter how severe” Where did you get your medical degree-the University of Dogpatch?

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

FlashOverride, you are just dead wrong. You can call an ambulance for a hangnail, and they are obligated by law to pick you up and take you to the emergency room, where the doctor is obligated to treat you, and you will not be held responsible for a dime. The law is called EMTALA.

Posted by: Chiara | July 6, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

FlashOverride, you are just dead wrong. You can call an ambulance for a hangnail, and they are obligated by law to pick you up and take you to the emergency room, where the doctor is obligated to treat you, and you will not be held responsible for a dime. The law is called EMTALA.

Posted by: Chiara | July 6, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

“You can call an ambulance for a hangnail, and they are obligated by law to pick you up and take you to the emergency room, where the doctor is obligated to treat you, and you will not be held responsible for a dime. The law is called EMTALA.”
Except that is not what the law says
EMTLA.com”EMTALA is Section 1867(a) of the Social Security Act, within the section of the U.S. Code which governs Medicare.
EMTALA applies only to “participating hospitals” — i.e., to hospitals which have entered into “provider agreements” under which they will accept payment from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Medicare program for services provided to beneficiaries of that program. In practical terms, this means that it applies to virtually all hospitals in the U.S., with the exception of the Shriners’ Hospital for Crippled Children and many military hospitals. Its provisions apply to all patients, and not just to Medicare patients. (See Section 15 below.)
The avowed purpose of the statute is to prevent hospitals from rejecting patients, refusing to treat them, or transferring them to “charity hospitals” or “county hospitals” because they are unable to pay or are covered under the Medicare or Medicaid programs. This purpose, however, does not limit the coverage of its provisions — see Sections 15 and 16 below.”
And that is for hospitals, not ambulance service.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE DEMOCRATS RUNNING AS FAR AWAY FROM HEALTH CARE REFORM AS POSSIBLE. FOR A PARTY SO PROUD OF AN ACHIEVEMENT, THEY TRY AT EVERY CHANCE TO HIDE FROM IT AND HOPE AMERICANS FORGET.

Posted by: Vince | July 6, 2010, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Not treating a patient who mcomes into an ER would violate several standard-of-care issues and Federal statutes. Jack Ohlander became a millionare several times over from cases nowhere near as egregious as dumping someone out of an ER.

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

RYAN, WHAT A CROCK, NO ONE IN THIS COUNTRY IS DENIED HEALTH CARE. WALK INTO ANY EMERGENCY ROOM AND BY LAW THEY TREAT YOU!

Posted by: Vince | July 6, 2010, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

“RYAN, WHAT A CROCK, NO ONE IN THIS COUNTRY IS DENIED HEALTH CARE. WALK INTO ANY EMERGENCY ROOM AND BY LAW THEY TREAT YOU!”
Its a waste of time to argue with someone who can’t figure out the caps lock button.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Why is everything an end run with this guy?

Posted by: LongT | July 6, 2010, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Gee Ryan you seem to know what level of care is appropriate in the ER.Have you ever been in one?Ever been in an ambulance? Ever see somebody send a kid out of the ER because ‘it wasn’t an emergency” and then have him come back 12 hours later in cardiac arrest? NOBODY GETS DENIED CARE IN AN ER IN THIS COUNTRY because they can’t pay.GIVE US EXAMPLES DR> RYAN.

Posted by: Nephron | July 6, 2010, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Ryan C, are you, by any chance, from PA?

Posted by: Tinamelina | July 6, 2010, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Ryan C wrote:”Google will find you plenty of examples”
.
You should ask Michelle oBama who was instrumental in creating the program at the University of Chicago Medical Center (while pulling a sweetheart $317K annual salary) which “redirected” low-income patients to community hospitals so it would have more beds for “non-low-income” patients needing the more profitable procedures. Patient-dumping those you didn’t want and cherry-picking those you wanted who could pay the big dollars.

Posted by: gk | July 6, 2010, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

“Berwick said society makes decisions about rationing all the time, and that the “decision is not whether or not we will ration care — the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open. And right now, we are doing it blindly.” – ABC News
Ha ha ha!
Makes sense to me.
If you ration blindly you affect both old democrats and republicans.
If you are watching, have your eyes open and check the person’s Data Mining Printout you could ration the republicans.
Who needs the illegal invader vote?
Just thin out the old Repubs!
Genius!

Posted by: Noz | July 6, 2010, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

You should ask Michelle oBama who was instrumental in creating the program at the University of Chicago Medical Center (while pulling a sweetheart $317K annual salary) which “redirected” low-income patients to community hospitals so it would have more beds for “non-low-income” patients needing the more profitable procedures”
So patient dumping does not exist except in this major program headed by Michele Obama.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Posted by: Tinamelina | Jul 6, 2010 10:28:02 PM
Yeah, Planet Adolescent.

Posted by: Noz | July 6, 2010, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Why is there no mention that Sen. Barrasso is a medical surgeon?

Posted by: bucbadger | July 6, 2010, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

“So patient dumping does not exist except in this major program headed by Michele Obama. ” – Ryan C.
Nah, I’m sure other major programs have followed her lead by now and do patient dumping as normal operating procedure.

Posted by: Noz | July 6, 2010, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

“NOBODY GETS DENIED CARE IN AN ER IN THIS COUNTRY because they can’t pay.GIVE US EXAMPLES”
I posted an examples of a man being denied care.
Even posted the cited law that has caveats when it comes to providing care.
I realize the hunt for Obama’s birth certificate occupies much of your brain but please try to keep up.
Of course now you’ve been trying to change denied medical care to denied car in an emergency room so even you realize I am right and you are quite wrong…again

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

“Nah, I’m sure other major programs have followed her lead by now and do patient dumping as normal operating procedure.”
From patient dumping does not exist to the patient dumping phenomenon was started by Michele Obama.
Ladies and gentleman, I present the incoherent right wing.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 6, 2010, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

The lengths the right wing goes to to defend their corporate masters…..
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 6, 2010 9:47:51 PM
Truly stunning.

Posted by: progressive mama | July 6, 2010, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Regardless of insurance or not, you WILL get care.
————
Good lord, Ryan C and Flash Override are correct and the usual suspects are making stuff up.
If Shoe’s statement (above the dotted line) is to be believed , then why have reputable studies shown that children and adults without insurance are more likely to die, when insurance– having it or not– is the only variable?
Get informed, people. Get informed.

Posted by: progressive mama | July 6, 2010, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

What he speaks is true. It’s not like insurance, or even a lack of, are not rationing now.
I had a brother in law die from a lack of insurance. In a hospital. I have no doubt his inability to pay greatly contributed to as little care as they were allowed to give.

Posted by: secondlook | July 7, 2010, 12:08 am 12:08 am

“Get informed, people. Get informed.”
And a caveat to this if you don’t mind progmama.
Getting informed is not listening to Rush or Beck or Hannity long enough to repeat what they said.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“From patient dumping does not exist to the patient dumping phenomenon was started by Michele Obama. ” – Ryan C.
Gee Ryan, I don’t know if I’d go so far as to say Michele Obama started patient dumping but she surely was a pioneer and got the most press about it. It makes sense that other Major Institutions would follow her lead.
: o )

Posted by: Noz | July 7, 2010, 12:23 am 12:23 am

An illegal alien with AIDS can come to a ER and get full care. It happens all of the time.If any ER actually turns away somebody they will get sued,they can also loose federal funding.Any hospital that looses medical billing will go out of business.You gave one anecdotal report-rare enough to be a news item.It just doesn’t happen.Go to a local ER-a large percentage there are underinsured-nobody is rounding them up and kicking them out.

Posted by: Nephron | July 7, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am

“.You gave one anecdotal report-rare enough to be a news item.It just doesn’t happen”
Except for that one time I posted. I can post many more times about people dying because their health insurance denied them treatment. But frankly its too depressing. Especially when people defend this practice by insurance companies.
Oh and it would be hard for us to know how many times or what a claim is denied for because insurance companies are not required to share that information.
The reason people found out about Wellpoint denying claims to women with breast cancer is CA requires disclosure of that info.
So even moving the goalposts…you failed.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 12:33 am 12:33 am

The right wing apparently thinks a health care system that uses the limited resources of the emergency room as a catch all for those without insurance is a good way to go.
Do I have that right?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 12:36 am 12:36 am

A very simple deduction can be made that since it’s been clearly shown that people who have insurance go for more check-ups and screenings, and early detection of cancer greatly improves your chances of recovery, then by these two statements alone it’s clear that people without insurance are more likely to die of cancer.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 12:44 am 12:44 am

They voted for it, the begged for it… If they truly want rationed health care, let them suffer for it.
True some people will pay a heavy price, but that is just the price of “progress…”
You’ll just have to elect new people to repeal it, two, four or six years from now depending on the election cycle. That’s the bottom line.
These people could have learned something if they ever had the chance to read “Make Room, Make Room!” or watch “Soylent Green” on tv or Google video.

Posted by: CBA | July 7, 2010, 4:48 am 4:48 am

Ryan C: “I can post many more times about people dying because their health insurance denied them treatment.”
Jack Murtha had great health insurance and the best medical care available on the planet. He died anyway.
Ted Kennedy had great health insurance and the best medical care available on the planet. He died anyway.
Robert Byrd had great health insurance and the best medical care available on the planet. He died anyway.
People WITH health insurance who are given the best available treatment die every single day.

Posted by: Mary | July 7, 2010, 7:04 am 7:04 am

If govt run health care is going to be so great, why did Obama and the dems protect themselves from ever having to be a part of it?
Will Michelle Obama sign her mother and children up for it?

Posted by: ginaNYC | July 7, 2010, 8:38 am 8:38 am

If govt run health care is going to be so great, why did Obama and the dems protect themselves from ever having to be a part of it?
Will Michelle Obama sign her mother and children up for it?

Posted by: ginaNYC | July 7, 2010, 8:38 am 8:38 am

No, Ryan, you have it wrong. Denying care to more people is what the end result of the healthcare overhaul. Trickle up welfare is what we are heading rapidly towards… Thanks for spreading the wealth, lol. That has never been a sustainable program. It always collapses and everyone (but the very elite – read that not YOU, Ryan, the Top Dem Politicians) will be miserable.

Posted by: Sensitive Sue | July 7, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Corrupt, incompetent, irresponsible, untruthful, ideologically blind…
Obama is the worst President ever.

Posted by: higgins1990 | July 7, 2010, 8:49 am 8:49 am

People should really look up the survival rates for breast and prostate cancer in the US vs. a place like the UK.

Posted by: Drew | July 7, 2010, 8:54 am 8:54 am

If I were to worry about Mediscare etc. I would probably worry more about a lot of unnecessary procedures and expense.. versus rationing.. it is a system that is out of control and easily manipulated and cheated. The burden of these transfer payments threatens all of us.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 7, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Don’t get sucked into the nitty gritty of the stupid liberal discussions, the gov’t has NO business getting involved in healthcare…NONE.
Nobody in government can run ANYTHING what the hell makes the left think they can run healthcare for 300 million people.
FAIL FAIL FAIL.

Posted by: ouldbollix | July 7, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am

“Republicans in Congress have made it clear in recent weeks that they were going to stall the nomination as long as they could, solely to score political points”. I love it when the White House makes such bold face lies. Republicans can’t stall anything. So if it was truly stalled it was because of democrats. Heck even the NYTimes is reporting that Senators were still waiting for Berwick to the questionnaire.
Does anyone else remember the times when recess appointments under Bush were just plain evil?

Posted by: Zaggs | July 7, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Have you had enough of “Hope N Change” Yet?

Posted by: savage24 | July 7, 2010, 9:34 am 9:34 am

” it is a system that is out of control and easily manipulated and cheated.”….and one that Obama and the Democrats just tied you to forever. You should be thanking them for putting the millstone around everyone’s neck. It’s more ‘fair’ to have you paying for your neighbor’s insurance and vice versa. Becuase you’re not individuals with differnet needs and wants. You’re sheep – to be herded and cattle-chuted through the “system” set up for you by your betters in a far off, crime-ridden city full of laywers and lobbyists.
Open wide. The changes start in January.
Aren’t you lucky!

Posted by: Good Lt. | July 7, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am

I am blaming LBJ.. we should have had the opportunity to have ‘Electocare’.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 7, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am

>Does anyone else remember the times when recess appointments under Bush were just plain evil?
Stop living in the past and move on dot org. That was in the dark time. The long, long ago.
This is the new era of hope and change, wingnuts. When Obama does something the liberals excoriated Bush for (like recess appointments), and he does it MORE than Bush, you see, it magically becomes OK. That’s the new math, kids.

Posted by: Good Lt. | July 7, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am

In some ways, I don’t like the shortcut to approval.. in other ways, these sessions with the appointees seem like a waste of time. I just wished that Obama would take a close and realistic look at his top level staffers.. and make some changes.. particularly in the economic ‘team’.. and if anyone (except Rahm) is a Clinton recycle.. get rid of them asap.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 7, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am

What did ya expect, a FREE RIDE with this guy…I am coming to the conclusion that if you voted for this Administration, you did the greatest dis-service to future generations than you possibly realize…EVERYBODY IS GOING TO PAY…

Posted by: Parallex View | July 7, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

The British system backed by the administration has calculated what it’s worth to extend your life by six months based on your age. For a sixty five year old patient, I think it’s about 18,000. In other words, if it’s going to cost more than X to keep you alive six months, you don’t get the treatment. It’s the primary reason their cancer survival rates are so much lower than ours. They routinely deny life saving treatment to the elderly. As for the guy complaining about insurance companies denying care, Medicaid actually denies claims at three to four times the rate of private insurers, I.e., you are much more likely to be denied care by your government that by a private insurer.for those whining about greedy insurers, the industry profit margin is three cents on the dollar.

Posted by: Dave C | July 7, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

what an evil thing to do. just another sneaky way to get the agenda shoved down the throoat of the AMERICAN people. Can’t wait til elections 2010 and 2012. Go Conservative not Progressive.

Posted by: mj | July 7, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

“I can post many more times about people dying because their health insurance denied them treatment.”
I can’t stand this meme. People die because they get awful illnesses that the body cannot beat. I know that there are abuses by some insurance companies, as well as some pretty disgusting reasons for denying claims, but they are not the norm.
You need to realize that insurance companies exist to make money, not to go bankrupt trying to save the lives of its customers. Its a harsh reality but there it is.

Posted by: J.R. | July 7, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

And….wait for it….The cost to your wallet and health are going to be increasing to the point of no stopping it….

Posted by: Parallex View | July 7, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

One more item, the health care effectiveness boards mandated by Obamacare have NO congressional oversight. To change their rules or fire a board member takes a two thirds majority vote, something the bill itself could never get.

Posted by: Dave C | July 7, 2010, 10:03 am 10:03 am

ryan c and pro mama, do you two not realize how hyproticial you are being? No, it isn’t okay for insurance companies to ration medical treatment and it isn’t okay for someone Obama appoints to ration it either! your posts seem to say as long as Obama does the rationing it’s okay. But than again, you guys blindly follow this guy. Hope there’s a net on the other side of that cliff!

Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | July 7, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am

There was no attempt to “stall the nomination” of this prospective appointee. Berwick never filed all the paperwork for the nomination to move forward. Obama is being disingenuous to say the least and deceptive to state the obvious.

Posted by: Sensitive Sue | July 7, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am

> Its a harsh reality but there it is.
Obamabots can’t deal with reality. It’s too “hard” and “not fair.”
They’ve appointed themselves as the new overlords of ‘fairness,’ naturally.
So open your wallet for “fairness” sake. Because you need to be penalized due to the wants and needs of your neighbor, who is YOUR responsibility.
Get it? Neither do they, but thinking isn’t important here. Only feeeeelings.

Posted by: Good Lt. | July 7, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Corrupt, incompetent, irresponsible, untruthful, ideologically blind…
Another day in the life of Obama.
ADSS

Posted by: Noz | July 7, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am

What people don’t know is that Berwick is a diehard redistributionist, socialist. He regards the British NHS as the model on which American health care should emmulate. If anyone knew how radical this Harvard elitist is, they would be shocked. Then again, didn’t the American people elect an out of touch, arrogant, Harvard elitist President?
Obam-bam is dismantling this country at a pace that is inconceivable.

Posted by: Mike Jefferson | July 7, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am

At this point in his presidency, Jake Tapper points out, George W. Bush had made 15 recess appointments. Democrats claimed that Bush was so abusive of the privilege that they started keeping the Senate in session continuously after taking control of the chamber in January 2007 to block any more recess appointments. How many recess appointments has Obama made? Eighteen.
(source: Ed Morrissey)

Posted by: TRAFF | July 7, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Death Panel, cough, cough, Death Panel?

Posted by: OxyCon | July 7, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am

“You need to realize that insurance companies exist to make money, not to go bankrupt trying to save the lives of its customers. Its a harsh reality but there it is”
Which is as good an argument as I’ve ever heard any liberal make as to why insurance companies cannot be trusted to protect the sick. It’s only profitable to cover the healthy. Only non-profits can cover everybody without a conflict of interest since trying to save the lives of their customers should be top priority, not turning a profit.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 11:46 am 11:46 am

At this point in his presidency, Jake Tapper points out, George W. Bush had made 15 recess appointments. Democrats claimed that Bush was so abusive of the privilege that they started keeping the Senate in session continuously after taking control of the chamber in January 2007 to block any more recess appointments. How many recess appointments has Obama made? Eighteen.
(source: Ed Morrissey)
Posted by: TRAFF | Jul 7, 2010 11:30:50 AM
as usual since Obama is doing it, it’s wonderful! Historical! No problem! move on folks nothing to see here!

Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | July 7, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Eighteen recess appointments so far. When Bush made his 15th the Dems called it “abusive.” they will be taught a very harsh lesson less than four months from now.
Failed stimulus…9.5% unemployment…epic fail.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | July 7, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Which is as good an argument as I’ve ever heard any liberal make as to why insurance companies cannot be trusted to protect the sick. It’s only profitable to cover the healthy. Only non-profits can cover everybody without a conflict of interest since trying to save the lives of their customers should be top priority, not turning a profit.
Or better yet, a MUTUAL insurance company. Their customers ARE their shareholders. There’s a useful tension there – harnessing the profit motive, and the good things that come with that, to the needs of the customers, minimizing the bad things like dropping the sick.
A non-profit does not have the incentive to stay fiscally healthy, and would fail out of sheer weight of claims, leaving everyone out in the cold, even the sick you are so worried about.

Posted by: weimerrj | July 7, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

What did Palin say about Death Panels???
Do you BO lovers get this….this guy wants to RATION health care, he will select who gets treatment and who dies. You guys should be screaming from the mountain tops

Posted by: barbfears | July 7, 2010, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

“A non-profit does not have the incentive to stay fiscally healthy, and would fail out of sheer weight of claims”
Which is why rationing becomes the hot-potato everybody throws around: one way or another everybody has to catch it. No system can afford to cover all the potential claims.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

What did Palin say about Death Panels???
Do you BO lovers get this….this guy wants to RATION health care, he will select who gets treatment and who dies. You guys should be screaming from the mountain tops
Posted by: barbfears | Jul 7, 2010 12:07:37 PM
They won’t even whisper cause they support this! Obama wants to let one guy make the decisions of who lives and who dies and it’s okay w/ them cause Bo says it’s okay so it’s okay! They are sheeple! def, dumb and blind sheeple!

Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | July 7, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

What are all of you conservatives complaining about?
If you cannot afford the best treatment, you die;let the market decide.
That’s your way of thinking so why complain when a policy wonk says basically the same thing?
This appointment will only be until the next Congress takes office in January, when, presumably, there will be a Republican majority to deny healthcare instead of Democrats.

Posted by: DanMingo | July 7, 2010, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Hide your grandma here comes the blue pill. Will it be voluntary or forced end of life by the government.

Posted by: Kala | July 7, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“this guy wants to RATION health care, he will select who gets treatment and who dies”
Greedy insurance companies are rationing healthcare right now.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

The American Board of Internal Medicine, which I am a member supports him. They never ask my opinion!

Posted by: MED | July 7, 2010, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

“The social budget is limited — we have a limited resource pool. It makes terribly good sense to at least know the price of an added benefit, and at some point we might say nationally, regionally, or locally that we wish we could afford it, but we can’t.”
Why can’t Obama and all the progressives make that statement about EVERY OTHER decision they have made?

Posted by: TheyComeInPeace | July 7, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Your nominee must really suck if you need a recess appointment while your party has 58 senate seats and an overwhelming majority in the House.
This transparency is just unprecedented, wouldn’t you say?

Posted by: Aaron | July 7, 2010, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

When your grandmother is denied healthcare that could save her life, and subsequently dies as a result, how will that hopey-changey thing be working for you then?

Posted by: Birdman | July 7, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Can we start the secession process yet?

Posted by: Bob | July 7, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Anyone actually surprised by this appointment of another socialist? This guy would not have been able to withstand a senate confirmation.
The winds of change are blowing hard now and November will prove it. Americans are all wide awake now. We’ll have to put up with some more damage to this great nation for a bit longer but we will take this country back!

Posted by: Illini Steve | July 7, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

The people do not have any idea what they did when they elected this pretender. He is taking apart this great nation piece by piece. How many peole would sing up to push for impeachment and then put this jerk in jail .

Posted by: bobkal | July 7, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“Any health care funding plan that is just equitable civilized and humane must, must redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is by definition redistributional.”
“I am romantic about the NHS*; I love it. All I need to do to rediscover the romance is to look at health care in my own country.”
*(National Health Service – UK’s govt. run healthcare agency)
- Excerpt from Donald Berwick speech (2008)
———————–
Jake – Any reason you left out these comments in your reporting? Comments such as these (which are a mere glimpse into Berwick’s heart) are why the leader of the “Most Transparent Administration Evah!” chose recess appointment.
Indeed, we’re all socialists now.
Thanks, Obama voters.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 7, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“since trying to save the lives of their customers should be top priority, not turning a profit.”
There is nothing stopping you or others from starting such a business.

Posted by: J.R. | July 7, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Of course everything he says is absolutely true. It’s true of every aspect of life, including every form of insurance.
The question is, will we preserve freedom of choice, economic freedom, and a healthy free market for healthcare so that when the rationing catches up to you, you will STILL have the choice to pay for your own treatment or additional coverage!

Posted by: daveg | July 7, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

The argument that this guy wants to ration is OK because insurance companies currently ration strikes me as odd.
People on the left have fought against that rationing. They said it was because of profits. One prominent Dem blog called it “Murder by Spreadsheet”. People who had services denied were used as examples of why we must get rid of private insurance companies.
Yet now, when the government seems to want to make laws codifying rationing schemes, it’s all good.

Posted by: MayBee | July 7, 2010, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Anyone making the “rationing” attack is either ignorant of the term’s meaning or being disingenuous. It’s sad to see that our elected officials are either incapable or unwilling to have an intelligent discussion about health care when people’s lives and the country’s economic future depend on it.

Posted by: @jporter | July 7, 2010, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

“Yet now, when the government seems to want to make laws codifying rationing schemes, it’s all good. ”
exactly, which was going to be my response to skip. apparently to him, all the matters is who is doing the rationing: insurance companies – bad; government – good.

Posted by: J.R. | July 7, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

“People on the left have fought against that rationing. They said it was because of profits”
If they’re being honest they’ll admit that everybody can’t have unlimited medical services, but as a health insurance provider if you have to turn a profit you’ll have less money to settle claims. For-profits have to ration more than non-profits.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Interestingly, using one of the reasons opponents hate insurance companies- rationing, to support MORE rationing is nothing less than idiocy. The Feds can say they are “putting decisions in the hands of the patient and MD” but what they ARE doing is diversionary. They are either pricing treatments so high they cannot be afforded.You can then talk to your MD to tell them you can’t afford treatment, instead of the Feds denying directly. In the insurance world, at least you have a reasonable chance of appeal, and the Feds can keep their hands clean, as they always do, just lie, divert, blame.

Posted by: Norine H | July 7, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

The new Nominee that Obama has sailed through as his man. is , of course , a hard line Socialist. Do his people love him? Of course they love him, they have as much as they need to operate. How about the patients? well, they only get what his welfare system gives them. They do not know if that is enough or not. I notice among the babies he serves in the varrious countries does not seem to have any pictures of children with any disability. That was always a big heart tugger to get contributions. They simply are not there with this guy. I WONDER WHY???

Posted by: John Smith | July 7, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

“For-profits have to ration more than non-profits”
This is terrible logic. The statement assumes that non-profits are just as efficient as for-profits in all expenses with the only difference being profit. That is simply not the case anywhere in the real world. Just look at how the government employs people with more pay, more benefits, and more protection from being fired for nonperformance than the private sector. Can anyone seriously make the argument that the government can manage a large enterprise as efficiently as a private company? If that were the case, socialism would have better than the 100% failure rate it enjoys today.

Posted by: Joe | July 7, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

If they’re being honest they’ll admit that everybody can’t have unlimited medical services, but as a health insurance provider if you have to turn a profit you’ll have less money to settle claims. For-profits have to ration more than non-profits.
======
The government has to please nobody. Private insurers have to attract customers, and incorrect rationing loses customers.
If you don’t like what the government does, where you gonna go?

Posted by: MayBee | July 7, 2010, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Of course there will be rationing!!! But the Government WANTS to be in control of it, rather than allowing Americans even to have a chance at possibly obtaining their own coverage. One can only ask WHY??? This is by far the most EVIL regime that has ever disgraced America. Americans must wake up before it is too late!!!!

Posted by: azsis | July 7, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

This is why we need this man impeached.. first get the demos out of control this fall and then start impeachment proceedings!!

Posted by: DJ | July 7, 2010, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Sounds like the death panels are making a come back… thats what rationing does….

Posted by: BC | July 7, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Pray for our incompetent president and his staff of curs.
Psalms 109:8
Let his days be few; and let another take his office.
AMEN.

Posted by: William | July 7, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

(“since trying to save the lives of their customers should be top priority, not turning a profit.”)
“There is nothing stopping you or others from starting such a business. ”
Boy, did you hit the nail on the head. Come on libs, start your own health insurance company.,…. with your own money!

Posted by: workforaliving | July 7, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

“The statement assumes that non-profits are just as efficient as for-profits in all expenses with the only difference being profit”
Yes, ceteris paribus is used all the time in economic models. If you want to try and prove other factors dominate knock yourself out but if it were obvious a lot less people would be nervous about privatizing Social Security

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Can you believe that 82% of Democrats STILL support Barack Obama. This is additional data which supports the contention that Democrats are not very intelligent. Would like to see their high-school transcript to see if they passed their U.S. Government class. Oh, and thank you “independents” for giving this disaster to the American people.

Posted by: William | July 7, 2010, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Skip: “Greedy insurance companies are rationing healthcare right now.”
Medicare, the single-payer system worshipped by liberals, rations healthcare right today. In fact, they deny a higher percentage of claims than most private insurers.
Medicare currently has nearly $76 TRILLION in unfunded mandates and an additional $19 TRILLION for just Part D (which started in 2006!). The operating losses are staggering and getting larger by the minute. Medicare will be doing a lot more rationing in the future. Sorry.

Posted by: Mary | July 7, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Euthanasia expert will be able to get rid of useless disabled who cost too much to keep alive under the cover of Obama’s secret plans to appoint a death panel expert without Congressional oversight.

Posted by: rowley | July 7, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

“If you don’t like what the government does, where you gonna go?”
If the choices are available go with a more expensive private plan. Despite claims to the contrary few Democrats advocate the elimination of private insurance.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

“Come on libs, start your own health insurance company.”
We just might do that someday. They’re called a public option or single-payer. Just because we fell short by one Joe Lieberman this time doesn’t mean they’re gone forever.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

We were assured this wasn’t going to happen, no death panels. Just another lie from the Democratic party. This was never about “healthcare”, it was about control over the population, power and money. Enjoy your socialist paradise while there’s still someone else’s money to pay for it. After that don’t get sick,

Posted by: who cares | July 7, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

To all the detractors: Please reread the article and consider the comparisons to President Bush and President Obama.
It is so easy to flip out, start gnashing one’s teeth and not bother finding out the details for yourself. Do that and make an *informed* decision, not one fed by the opinion makers on TV. If you are going to critize anyone, do so with as much *neutral* information as possible. I suggest factcheck.org…
I’m not a liberal or a conservative. I am simply an American.

Posted by: Ithaca | July 7, 2010, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

“Thanks, Obama voters.”
You’re welcome.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

“What did Palin say about Death Panels”
Palin parroted Betsy McCaughney…original thought is not her forte.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“Can anyone seriously make the argument that the government can manage a large enterprise as efficiently as a private company”
The Republicans sure seemed ready to make that very same argument when they expressed concerned that a public option would eliminate private insurance since private firms would not be able to compete with non-profits. Or were they not serious?

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

The concerns noted are about whose values will be used to “redistribute health care resources” The present administration has practiced duplicity in all of its politics to date and I am sure that “granny” will not want some material centrally located bureaucratic “moralist” defining what “patient centered care” means for her particular needs. These so-called experts like Berwick harbor a nanny state agenda, which needs to be subjected to the light of day, before he takes over a post affecting 1/6 of the nation’s economy. Maybe Prez O can put that on C-Span as well.

Posted by: Don Galamaga | July 7, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

“Come on libs, start your own health insurance company.”
We just might do that someday. They’re called a public option or single-payer.”
Yes, you are so brave with other people’s money. Remember, there is no “right” to healthcare.

Posted by: J.R. | July 7, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I am going to continue to eat bacon wrapped donuts washed down with beer… The govt will “fix” it and I’ll be fat and maybe jolly… word up…

Posted by: grover | July 7, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

@ Skip:
The argument that private companies won’t be able to compete with government ones has nothing whatsoever to do with any supposed “efficiency” on the part of the government, and everything to do with the government-funded programs having access to essentially a bottomless source of free capital in the form of tax increases on the citizenry at large.
This is a false analogy, and you – by your phrasing – clearly knew it.
Please don’t insult other readers by assuming they won’t see through your logical fallacies.

Posted by: Xeno | July 7, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

The Republicans sure seemed ready to make that very same argument when they expressed concerned that a public option would eliminate private insurance since private firms would not be able to compete with non-profits. Or were they not serious?
==========
You don’t mean non-profits, do you? Don’t you mean government?
There are private, not for profit insurance companies now.
The concern is about competing with a government-run program, because business can’t compete with an entity that can run an endless deficit and write the regulations to benefit itself.

Posted by: MayBee | July 7, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

We’re getting exactly what we deserve for putting this self-righteous demigod in the White House. Just wait, there’s more to come.

Posted by: Quetzalcoatl | July 7, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Well, the exaulted one is at it again. First he lied about rationing and death panels and now he hires an expert and supporter of both. You moron lemmings keep voting for these people. Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Schumer and Frank are going to control your access to everthing. Does the word domesticated cattle sound familier? Thats what these people have in store for you.

Posted by: mikeusnret | July 7, 2010, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

The lunatic-left healthcare RATIONING, ABORTION and DEATH PANEL czar is now in place.

Posted by: TeaPartyyPatriot | July 7, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

And Sarah Palin’s the one that’s crazy for talking about Death Panels. It’s even worse — he’s the Death Dispenser.

Posted by: DaveInMN | July 7, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

The entire establishment is a giant pile of vomit chunks!
NO FOX/CNN/MSNBC Backed Candidates 2012!
Vote out all establishment candidates and then we’ll end the Fed and then possibly we can get out of this mess- the IRS too.

Posted by: ronny | July 7, 2010, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

“government-funded programs having access to essentially a bottomless source of free capital in the form of tax increases on the citizenry at large”
What, are you trying to tell me it’s unfair? I don’t have any interest in protecting for profit insurance if it fails to cover people once the get sick and costs continue to skyrocket. That’s what a public option is intended to do where private insurance is failing: to protect the citizenry at large in sickness and in health.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“Berwick said the degree to which the knowledge base is “linked directly to policy and decision is a matter of choice. You could make it advisory, or you could make it mandatory, or you could make it a policy rule.”
And we know exactly which choice he will make – MANDATORY.
The weak must go to the wall. The strong must help them there.

Posted by: eristic | July 7, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Just remember to tell your doctors you are transgender and belong to a union. You won’t have to worry about death panels or rationing.

Posted by: DisturbedMary | July 7, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Berwick quotes: “invisible hand of the market…” “darkness of private enterprise…” “unfair daylight of the press…” “using your tax base to provide a single point of finance…” “must redistribute wealth…”
Gee, I wonder why Obama had to sneak this guy through as a recess appointment. Someone needs to send him a copy of our constitution…

Posted by: Gary Johnston | July 7, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Berwick quotes: “invisible hand of the market…” “darkness of private enterprise…” “unfair daylight of the press…” “using your tax base to provide a single point of finance…” “must redistribute wealth…”
Gee, I wonder why Obama had to sneak this guy through as a recess appointment. Someone needs to send him a copy of our constitution…

Posted by: Gary Johnston | July 7, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I love the fact that “Now” we are hearing and seeing that there will be “rationing” of health care. The libs and other radicals said that was all a lie by conservatives, and lo and behold , now they themselves are admitting it will be so. Liberals, they lie and will do whatever they can to achieve their goals. Just like communists.

Posted by: Charles | July 7, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Did we just get a drudge link, what’s with all the new idiots?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

This communist needs to be ousted. Let’s agree to start by kicking out his supporting politburo this November.

Posted by: walljasper | July 7, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

This communist needs to be ousted. Let’s agree to start by kicking out his supporting politburo this November.

Posted by: walljasper | July 7, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

“That’s what a public option is intended to do where private insurance is failing: to protect the citizenry at large in sickness and in health.”
I thought we, as free-born citizens, were responsible for our own personal well-being?
If I make bad decisions throughout my life (diet of Big Macs, pizza, sugary drinks, etc.; bottle o’ Jack and 3 packs o’ cigarettes a day, etc.) and become unhealthy (diabetes, cancer, lung disease, etc.) does the gubbermint (in reality, tax-paying citizens) “owe” me access to affordable healthcare coverage (even tho’ at that point I will have a “pre-existing condition” of my own making)?

Posted by: tjp612 | July 7, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

“If I make bad decisions throughout my life (diet of Big Macs, pizza, sugary drinks, etc.”
Don’t try and tell me Republicans will have anything to do with personal responsibility, they’ll call it infringing on freedom.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Question: How do you solve the $10T Social Security and Medicare deficit?
Answer: Don’t pay for treatment that is deemed “costly”. Medicare costs go down and those people no longer receive SS checks. 2 birds with one rationing stone.
But don’t you dare mention death panels….

Posted by: Mr. Johnson | July 7, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

For all the fools who criticized Conservative’s assertions that the Obama Healthcare plan would inevitably lead to rationing of healthcare – you can apologize and beg forgiveness from the population you injured now? Those who re really stupid can just wait until this shill gets the rationing going and volunteer to be in the first batch of Soylent Green.

Posted by: student1776 | July 7, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

ABC do a real report on this, Senator Baccus a Democrat just came out against Obama for this appointment. Mostly for the same reasons I have, he was not even put before a committee! Not one person in Congress asked a question of this man in charge of overseeing 1/6th of our economy! He wasn’t even scheduled for a committee, and the one’s doing the scheduling are Democrats and Obama Admin staff! Wake up America you are having the wool pulled over your eyes… This is unacceptable no matter who is President!
ABC tell me how many of the 15 under Bush didn’t even go before a committee? I would really like to know! And see Baccus’s comments on here as well! Democrats have no back bone to vote against Obama on this, and were afraid of the vote for being viewed in front of the American People!

Posted by: John | July 7, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

“Don’t try and tell me Republicans will have anything to do with personal responsibility, they’ll call it infringing on freedom.”
Posted by: Skip | Jul 7, 2010 2:57:25 PM
I’m not a Repbulican (it’s the far lesser of two evils at this point), but it is exactly what I’m advocating: personal responsibility. Try it sometime, it is very liberating.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 7, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Finally, someone who actually acknowledges the fact that formal rationing will take place. For too long, ObamaCare proponents were completely denying it.
LOVE the Orwellian “NICE” reference, too. Bravo.

Posted by: JR Cash | July 7, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

WAY TO GO OBAMA. More proof that the government is smarter than the electorate. Obama continues to push HIS agenda. 2012 can’t get her fast enough.

Posted by: Wilbur Post | July 7, 2010, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

It used to be that old people were afraid to go to the hospital because they might not come out……now they will KNOW that they won’t coming out. I guess Jack Kevorkian wasn’t available for this gig.

Posted by: Fred789 | July 7, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

This recess appointment makes my blood boil.

Posted by: Maria KP | July 7, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

“Try it sometime, it is very liberating”
I don’t smoke, I don’t drink, I don’t eat junk food, and despite being far from a spring chicken I’ll race you twice around the block any day. But don’t try and get Republicans to try it.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Palin was right when she said “death panels”. I hope I’m around to see Obama & Pelosi & Reid and all the other idiots get their health care rationed.

Posted by: meadowlands | July 7, 2010, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Based on the rationale of rationing, it would seem as a lottery system would be more fair.

Posted by: rbblum | July 7, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Actually the views of Dr, Berwick are immaterial.This “holiday appointment” is nothing but a cynical attempt to short-circuit the legislative process.A vote was never scheduled.A hearing was never scheduled.The whole process was never started for Dr, Berwick.The President is deathly afraid that someone might actually ask a question about his views-and those views may be opposed by most Americans.It is much easier if nobody asks questions,or if nobody votes.

Posted by: Nephron | July 7, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

@ skip, I’ll take you up on that anytime. my conservative friends are in FAR better shape than my liberal acquaintances, but like you, they’re interminably narcissistic. Kinda goes with bein’ liberal – (usually) baseless narcissism

Posted by: shemp | July 7, 2010, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

There are finite resources in healthcare: number of ICU beds, vaccines, liver transplants, doctors, etc. The key question is.. WHO will do the rationing? Unelected (and now unconfirmed) bureaucrats at the medicare Independent Payment Advisory Board, better known as the death panel, or YOU and YOUR FAMILY in the context of owning private insurance.
Comparative healthcare research is a good thing…but evidence based medicine must always take into account the clinical situation of the individual patient in your office.
The field of medicine is headed toward individualized care. Not only is federal rationing wrong politically and ethically, is is very BAD medicine. There is no way the bureaucrats can keep up with the pace of medical knowledge which doubles every 5 years.

Posted by: Maria KP | July 7, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

While I do have a problem with any president trying to sneak in an appointment, what Berwick is saying is true. Sorry folks, the government can’t be all things to all people; there just aren’t enough resources. How much more can they take from our paychecks before it becomes fruitless to even work? Silly me, when I budget at home, we cut expenses; we don’t have the option of taking money from someone else to pay for new expenditures.
The government can’t manage anything and we’re to trust it with healthcare of all things?! Be careful what you ask for because it may very well be some bureaucrat making a statistics-based decision as to who gets treatment with limited resources: the ten year-old with cancer, the 48 year-old dad who needs heart surgery, grandma who needs a new hip, the premature infant? I sure wouldn’t want to make those decisions.
And, tjp612, I agree! I take care of myself, eat right and exercise, but I get to pay more in taxes for lazy people not willing to take responsibility? No, thank you. If it’s something of one’s own doing, he/she should be footing the tab. That’s one reason (of dozens) that our insurance rates are so high: the lazy people are the “gimmes.” Wait, that’s the problem with just about everything.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | July 7, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Now hold on there shemp, just because I challenged you guys to a race around the block doesn’t make me a narcissist….I never said I was sure I was going to win. I just know I’m in good enough shape to run around the block twice.

Posted by: Skip | July 7, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

I’ve learned a lot about the system at my cancer support group.. it is way overpriced and inefficient.. but it’s the best in the world.. and I get that input from people from other continents.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 7, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Now which one of you naysayers will apologize to Sarah Palin first?

Posted by: Jane | July 7, 2010, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Obama is pulling the plug on grandma -
like only a Communist dictator can.
We will remember in November, comrade Obama.

Posted by: One_American | July 7, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

“…it is way overpriced and inefficient.. but it’s the best in the world.. and I get that input from people from other continents.”
So where will we go when the Leftists completely screw up our healthcare system?

Posted by: tjp612 | July 7, 2010, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

He’s not an expert on Rationing. He’s an expert on socialized medicine and on wealth redistribution. They guy is a total dyed in the wool socialist. Oh…and say hello to the death squads again. They will be determining who gets what care or any care at all.

Posted by: John Q. | July 7, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Regardless of whatever official sounding name they attach to them, Death Panels are coming to America unless all this government health care nonsense is repealed ASAP. Rationing takes place right now. There are always limited resources available and the medical community has to make very difficult decisions about where those resources go. Nobody likes the idea of rationing but I feel much better with doctors making those sorts of decision for their patients than government bureaucrats doing it.

Posted by: Whosiwhatzit | July 7, 2010, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

With this group of socialist in charge are we very far from Solyent Green?

Posted by: John Q. | July 7, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

“I’m not a Repbulican (it’s the far lesser of two evils at this point), but it is exactly what I’m advocating: personal responsibility”
TJP advocates personal responsibility yet he can’t admit he’s a Republican.
He just relentless defends republicans nad passes on their talking points.
ROFLMAO!

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“So where will we go when the Leftists completely screw up our healthcare system?”
To the top notch single payers system like the rest of the developed world?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

“With this group of socialist in charge are we very far from Solyent Green?”
Its good to see the right wing is grounded in reality….

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

I’ll bet that Berwick’s real name is Kevorkian and he changed it at Obama’s direction. He will probably get a cut of every hip replacement,cataract surgery and heart surgery he denies. Look out granny!

Posted by: Manrice | July 7, 2010, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Why is it that libs continually tout the great socialist medical systems around the world but when folks in those countries get sick, where do they want to go? The good old USA. Happens time and again. Deny it all you want but read the news.

Posted by: John Q. | July 7, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“I’ll race you twice around the block any day. But don’t try and get Republicans to try it.”
What does this even mean exactly? I don’t consider myself a republican, but I often vote for those candidates. And I’ll take you up on that offer as well and I’ll do it while eating a big mac and sucking down a beer.

Posted by: J.R. | July 7, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“With this group of socialist in charge are we very far from Solyent Green?”
“Its good to see the right wing is grounded in reality….”
Yeah…and death panels will never ever happen in this country. Left wingers are so myopic they cant see the facts for the farce.

Posted by: John Q. | July 7, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Rationing indicates that there is a limited (finite) supply of an item, good or service. It also indicates that some will receive, and others will be denied. Who will make this determination, and what criteria will they use?
/We’re from the government. We’re here to help you.

Posted by: Muhammed's Rotting Skull | July 7, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

ok, i get it. people do sometimes get sick because they don’t eat right and don’t exercise. but, people also get diseases that have absolutely nothing to do with health habits and sometimes have to do with aging or just plain catching diseases. are they going to quit fixing wornout knees and hips? yes, a wheelchair and a pain pill would be cheaper and it would be cheaper to just declare an age at which one just crawls off into the forest and dies quietly and without inconveniencing anyone as some primitive tribes used to do. i don’t really think it will come to that, but a lot of things have happened in the last two years that i never could have imagined would happen, such as the President of the United States bowing to an arabian king or our space program being used to make foreign countries and their religions “feel better” about themselves. I’m waiting to see what happens next and we can’t do a darn thing about it, can we?!

Posted by: smitty | July 7, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

“Why is it that libs continually tout the great socialist medical systems around the world but when folks in those countries get sick, where do they want to go? The good old USA”
Yes the wealthy can go anywhere they want paying top dollar.
That’s why Magic Johnson went to France for experimental HIV therapies.
But for the rest of us, Europeans go to doctors and hospitals just like we do.
Except that the Europeans don’t go bankrupt because they because ill or injured.
That’s an American phenomenon….USA! USA!USA!

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

It is almost time..

Posted by: Paul 1931 | July 7, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

“That’s why Magic Johnson went to France for experimental HIV therapies.”
You can thank FDA (i.e. government) regulations for that. And that sort of thing is not going to disappear with the government take-over of healthcare.

Posted by: J.R. | July 7, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

And so the socialist house of cards begins to fall apart as it always does…
The donks are doomed in November.

Posted by: Dredd | July 7, 2010, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Can you say Death panel? Well now you have one. And the taxes just keep pileing up.. one day socialism will spend all your grandkids money.. and will be ready to bump them off to get those great grandkids in the labor market.

Posted by: Richard | July 7, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

“The social budget is limited — we have a limited resource pool.”
He’s absolutely right, on all counts. We are headed for rationing no matter what anyone does. Except … what he’s talking about is government imposing its idea of rationing on us, rather than letting us work it out for ourselves. And we all know how that will work out – they will decide who lives and who dies, and we all know what their criteria will be.

Posted by: M Gillia | July 7, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Sarah Palin was right. The Death Panel is being assembled, and Dr. Death has just been appointed. Berwick will literally decide who lives and who dies, based on what medical treatment he allows them to receive. My guess is that he will try to wipe out all conservatives first and foremost.

Posted by: Justin | July 7, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

“My guess is that he will try to wipe out all conservatives first and foremost.” – Justin
B I N G O !

Posted by: Noz | July 7, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

“I don’t smoke, I don’t drink, I don’t eat junk food” – Skip
Remind me not to ask you out on a date.

Posted by: Noz | July 7, 2010, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

When are the remaining moderates and any last open minded democrats going to wake up and see that democratic leaders do not care about freedom in anyway shape or form? Yes, there are republican leaders who would sell us out for money, but these people just want total control over everyone’s lives… even to the point of ending a life whenever THEY feel like it. Evil does not always know it is evil, and these “leaders” epitomize it.

Posted by: jones | July 7, 2010, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

THE DEATH PANELS ARE COMING
THE DEATH PANELS ARE COMING

Posted by: constitution 101 | July 7, 2010, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

The first thing this guy can do is check Obama’s hearing. Only one post so far out of 48 comes anywhere close to supporting either Obama’s forced insurance program or the recess appointment. And as far as I can tell, there’s really no argument about the declining quality of health care nor the re-introduction of “death squad” to define Dr. Rationing’s approach to shrinking medical care to provide a lower level of coverage for everyone. Nearly 70% of Americans oppose the forced insurance program. I suppose it’s hard to catch up with with the American voter really wants when you are on the campaign trail all the time.

Posted by: wantingbalance | July 7, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

For all the Obamabots left, when will you see this man has done nothing but LIE to the American public since he took office. “There will be no health care rationing!!” Something he said over and over and even mocked Sarah Palin’s remark about death panels.
She called it right. And now he’s appointing a ration-supporter without the approval of Congress. This is unbelievable. I do not want the government telling me whether or not I will get treatment.
Vote these liars out of office and do not allow Obama to continue circumventing our Constitution.
There will be hell to pay on election day.

Posted by: Dee | July 7, 2010, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Does the rationing in lieu of those lacking personal responsibility for their actions count for those with HIV and AIDS, too, if it is acquired thru dirty needles and sexual habits?

Posted by: Dinosaur | July 7, 2010, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Being denied care in the US is the exception, rather than the reality. One of two of our hospitals in this small city provides over $200 million a year in donated care. The other hospital does even more since it’s affiliated with a medical school. Community Health Centers cover all the counties. They rake in millions in grants each year. Their CEOs make great salaries. They also are reimbursed for Medicare and Medicaid patients. They are governed by a board made up of at least 51% patients. They must represent the community served in terms of economic, ethnic and gender status. It was difficult to get a homeless rep to come to meetings. In most cases these patients have zero knowledge in finance, budgeting, grants, and the provision of healthcare. While it IS important to have their input, sadly….they go with whatever is recommended. They put their trust in the center’s executive and health professional staff and in some cases, are lead like sheep.

Posted by: Dinosaur | July 7, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

There WILL be rationing of health care, and there WILL be elderly Americans that a government appointee decides, “has had a good long life.”
It WILL be your mother, your father…and eventually, you.
That is, unless you’re a politician.
When opportunity arises, vote to defund this horrible Un-American healthcare bill!

Posted by: Rob S in Fl | July 7, 2010, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

“You Lie!” hussein is really the gift that keeps on giving to Repubs. All they need do is run and re-run and re-run videos of the outrageous, incendiary, insane comments of this lunatic healthcare RATIONING, ABORTION and DEATH PANEL czar during the campaign. That will ensure that the d-crat socialists have the biggest losses in American history in that election. And if that isn’t enough, run videos of hussein/holder slamming Arizona’s immigration reform efforts. Hopefully, the d-crat socialists will be put out of power for the next century, or more.

Posted by: TeaPartyyPatriot | July 7, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

This doesn’t look good. When I become up a “non-productive” senior citizen, I’ll be sent home to die. Oh well. But Hey! Maybe I’ll wind up being a tasty Green Wafer.

Posted by: adm454 | July 7, 2010, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

First, all patients will begin to share beds, then urinals, and then ventilators.
I would like to give Berwick a ration of my stool.
There is and can be no rationale or defense for choosing this man. He is far from the most qualified for the job, unless you consider health care rationing as your top criterion. You libs got us into it; we’ll use you to mop up from this hideous disatater of an Administration … and you Dem/lib-leaning “independents” won’t get off easily, either.

Posted by: Mhu Cao | July 7, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

It about makes me sick to join a forum on abc. I’ve completely stopped listening to their news (and I use to enjoy GMA and many of their commentators before they sold their souls to the devil. No job is worth the amount of lies they have told for this administration). Shame on you Jake tapper for white washing the real story here.
My reason for allowing abc the privilege of my time is to state that I’m a handicapped individual at no fault of my own. Thankfully, medicine has given me the opportunity to live in minimal pain so that I can enjoy raising my 12 year old and my husband and best friend. However I now fear what will happen to me since my medicine is quite expensive. I’m 49 years old and hopefully have many more years. Will this death guide think so too. And if he allows my meds, will I ultimately hit a limit and lose the meds thus no quality of life?
How can those on the left not see what is so blatantly obvious. Go to the Internet and hear it from his own mouth!!! Please wake up before it’s too late to turn back. This miserable life altering disease might hit you next. Disease has no party affliation!
Blessings

Posted by: Tnacgal | July 7, 2010, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Can you spell euthanasia for the elderly and very sick? But then again why not take it a step further. Are you not in alignment with the govt’s way of thinking? Don’t believe it just wait and see. Pulling the plug on conservatives will be easy for these progressives. Gives them less of a percentage to fight against them.

Posted by: MK | July 7, 2010, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

C’mon ABC …….. do some actual
reporting and stop being cheerleaders for this guy.
Dr. Death…….thats a great nickname for this guy and I hope that everyone starts to use it over and over.

Posted by: Grim Reeper | July 7, 2010, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

C’mon ABC …….. do some actual
reporting and stop being cheerleaders for this guy.
Dr. Death…….thats a great nickname for this guy and I hope that everyone starts to use it over and over.

Posted by: Grim Reeper | July 7, 2010, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

One wonders how the right wing media gets away with lying to its audience over and over again.
And then you encounter the right wing and you see how dominant paranoia and conspiracy minded thinking is.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2010, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Obama is KILLING this country.

Posted by: Jonny | July 7, 2010, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

President Bush, a White House official said, “was not facing the same level of obstruction. Twenty-eight of President Obama’s nominees have been held on the Senate floor for more than three months. At this point in the Bush administration, only six of his nominees had been waiting that long.”
Isn’t that a pretty good sign that GW wasn’t appointing such radicals?

Posted by: hoots | July 7, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

When will the idiots that fell and voted for Obama realize that he hates our country and is trying to ruin it?
He’s ruined the best health care system in the world, he’s fired the head of GM to show “he won” and has no business being president. This man has done nothing good for this country, it’s clear he hates the USA.
Do you all rememeber Mrs. O’s comments that this was the first time she was proud of her country? Let them both go to China, a communist country that he’d like.

Posted by: Carol | July 7, 2010, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Wow – just because most of you disagree with the way Obama is doing things you blame him for ruining our healthcare system!? What denial you must have been living with for the past three decades!
Hmmm… what was it that Conservatives always used to say when people disagreed with their point of view…? Oh yeah – “If you don’t like it then you can LEAVE THE COUNTRY!”
But you don’t hear the liberals saying that, do you? Because they are not nearly so mean-spirited and belligerent as Conservatives. Unbelievable. Truly embarrassed for Conservatives that they can’t seem to have an intelligent debate about important issues without getting so emotional that they undermine their own argument. We need rational ideas on all sides here. Please at least make an attempt to put forth something useful.

Posted by: Roy | July 7, 2010, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

What about the Liberals (eg.Alec Baldwin) who claimed that they would leave the country if Bush was elected?

Posted by: Nephron | July 7, 2010, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

This country is heading for a storm caused by the separation of politicians and the general public. Obama is proof positive of this very phenomenon. He was elected on the hope of change by the people. Today, he is an extension of the already rampant corruption in politics. Those who think they will EVER receive free health care are as blind and ignorant as the politicians themselves. Race,Party,Creed – all tools they use to collect votes. The general public has set back and contributed to this utter defamation of our country’s values. Listened to leaders who don’t care about them, but want their vote. They LIE to our faces and yet still support them because they say they are one of us. America.. research the following items…WAKE UP. Cap and Trade, Commerce Clause in Constitution, Codex Alimentarius, Executive Order 13489, Tim Osman, Gulf of Tonkin, Georgia Guidestones. We have been fooled…how long are we going to fight this antagonized battle that feeds these corrupt politicians? We must WAKE UP..the enemy is not your neighbor–> He is the one telling you to hate your neighbor… Do your research. America is great because of it’s people…not it’s politicians. Politicians are heading us into civil unrest, so they can enact more laws for control. If you can’t see that, then you have been duped and are what I call 6of10. 6 out of 10 people are not intelligent enough to see the big picture…I believe in my heart that at least 3 of the 6 have just not woken up. Will YOU wake up? The turn starts with you. -God Bless the USA!

Posted by: RTC | July 7, 2010, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

may
Berwick be the first to receive his own medicine when he falls ill!

Posted by: TC | July 7, 2010, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

@Roy– How DARE you! Tell us to leave the country because we believe in it’s fundamental values. I am an American and will not sacrifice this land or my children’s future for people who don’t know the first thing about liberty, freedom, and the rights our ancestors fought to uphold. No Roy.. I will die here… and will fight ANYONE who tries to take the rights away. If violence is needed for a true “Change”..then violence it will be! Myself, I will die with the flag raised and gun in hand…for My Country!
If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.
-Thomas Paine

Posted by: RTC | July 7, 2010, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

The death panels are here. My parents worked 50 years, always paid their taxes, never accepted a penny of public assistance. Since Obamacare they have been denied medical care. I read the government form letter. This is genocide and we are all accomplices standing idly by as people are allowed to perish. We are no better than the Germans who allowed so many to be erased from this world. It is that serious. When we awake it will be from the guilt and shame we all share.

Posted by: Dannyoso | July 8, 2010, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Oh there’s a big surprise. Obama lied about no more politics as usual, breaking yet another campaign promise. Add it to the growing list. Actually, has he told the truth on anything? I think just his intent on socializing medicine. What a complete, unmitigated disaster this guy is.

Posted by: William Ripskull | July 8, 2010, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Only communists think so little of the gift of life. From the point of conception, to the final ending days of a person’s awareness, the left demeans and denigrates everything beautiful in life. Abortion, partial birth abortion, doctor assisted suicide, state sponsored death panels all are tenets of Obamaland. The only deaths libs can’t abide are those of murderers.

Posted by: Betsp | July 8, 2010, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Simple if you are determined to be unqualified for treatment or meds and end of life counseling is advised. Do your country a great service and try to take at least ten of the criminals whom sponsored and supported this foul legislation with you.

Posted by: Veritas | July 8, 2010, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Death panel Czar!

Posted by: Quo Warranto? | July 8, 2010, 12:58 am 12:58 am

“Myself, I will die with the flag raised and gun in hand.”
Just make sure you only take yourself and no innocents like other right wing nutjobs

Posted by: Ryan C | July 8, 2010, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Sure sounds like we are going to experience a re run of Germany in the 1930s. Either we get rid of the Democrats in November, otherwise you might want to find a different country to live in!

Posted by: craig | July 8, 2010, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Once central planning takes over heath care, impeccable logic will be applied to all…
With a certain health care budget, statistics will be applied to ascertain the best use of the budget…
Each person will be assessed to determine the number of years of “quality” life remaining… (QLR index)…
This index will be determined taking into account all heath factors, bad personal habits, congenital illnesses, gene defects, accidents and illnesses, as determined by computer analysis of the national heath records database now being implemented…
The index will be stored in the national QLR database…
The heath care budget will be allocated to maximize the QRL index for the entire population… this will result in a Dollars per QLR figure…
All medical expenditures will be evaluated in light of the national goal as determined by the patients QLR index.
For example, if the Dollars per QRL figure is $25,000 and you need an operation with a cost of $75,000, and your computer QRL index is 2, you will be denied the operation and given a pain pill instead.
If you are involved in an accident, the responding ambulance will consult the national QRL database to determine if you should be transported to a hospital, or to a hospice…
It will be such a great thing… social justice for all… ” it can’t be called ungentle, but how thoroughly departmental!”
All men are treated equal(ly) before the QLR database…
If you think this is far-fetched, you have no experience with Government management… but you will…
But don’t worry, pain pills will be free and plentiful…
An even if you qualify for a treatment you will be given the opportunity to serve the common good by opting out, and thus you will be declared a “Hero of the State.”

Posted by: Quo Warranto? | July 8, 2010, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Remember that “study” or report from Leftwing Berkeley faculty or associated as to deriding “Conservatives” and “rightwingers” as somehow mentally defective?
It’s been roundly denounced as unreliable (no surprise there) but I think I see now why such a statement was ever declared.
Meanwhile, humanity by majority views the Leftwing as being the actual mental defectives in our midst. I don’t think I’d have to work too hard to get ublic majority agreement on that.
Please vote these Leftwing monsteres out of office this Fall and in 2012.

Posted by: Citizen | July 8, 2010, 4:29 am 4:29 am

Medical intake interview in the Obama near future:
Intake personnel asks visitor:
– “Hi, do you agree with Barack Obama that the Constitution is flawed?”
(A “No” answer will get you marked as “possibly violent, to be considered for psychotropics.”
– “Well, did you vote for the Democrat in the last Senate race or the Republican, uhh, person?”
(A “for the Republican…” answer will get you sent to the clerk for aspirion and a couple of brochures on the Glories of Marx and Obama…)

Posted by: Citizen | July 8, 2010, 4:33 am 4:33 am

President Bush, a White House official said, “was not facing the same level of obstruction. Twenty-eight of President Obama’s nominees have been held on the Senate floor for more than three months. At this point in the Bush administration, only six of his nominees had been waiting that long.”
This proves that Bush nominated centrist-based persons since the senate was almost balanced between the number of democrats versus the number of republicans. Obama had a FILLIBUSTER PROOF super majority (i.e. 60 demcrats and Independents/Socialists – who vote with democrats – in the senate) and still could not get his nominees confirmed. Common sense leads one to conclude that either (1) the senate was too busy working on other issues to bring Obama’s nominees to the floor or (2) Obama’s nominees were so far left that even the FILIBUSTER PROOF super maority of democrats could not support his choices. Given Dr. Death’s (Donald Berwick) credentials, my common sense leads me to conclude that the latter is likely the reason the 28 nominees have not been confirmed.
If people do not see Obama as who he is – a socialist, then they choose to be blind. Also, those who made fun of Palin and her death panels owe her an apology.
Finally, Dr. Death should scare every American to include progressives, socialists and comunists. Fact. No American knows what disease or injury they might contract tomorrow, next week or next year. Disease, cancer, auto accidents, etc do not discrimminate. They attack regardless of age, sex, race, sexualy orientation and political affiliation. Dr. Death’s statistical database will refuse expensive reconstructive surgery for the 25 year old progressive who was injured in a skateboard accident as quickly as it will deny the hip replacement for the 70 year old reitred UAW auto worker.

Posted by: bill | July 8, 2010, 6:53 am 6:53 am

Too bad ABC and the media in general still worship this man sitting in the oval office as some kind of God. His sneaky behind the back appointments without oversight show you he is devious, hateful, and a traitor to the nation and its constitution. There is nothing to worship, the emperor has no clothes. He is a statist who wants dictatorial powers and will use any devious trick to get it done. Does anyone know how far left and abusive Dr. Berwick is?

Posted by: Gnarly | July 8, 2010, 7:36 am 7:36 am

We retired people have been knocked down,spit-on and crucified with no interest income from our hard work savings,investments that could go down the drain at any time and now the socialist / communist (liberal) party wants to make our last few years as miserable as possible by finding ways to kill us off. It is a shame that we can no longer depend on our children and grandchildren to protect our nation and our FREEDOM.

Posted by: oldgoat22 | July 8, 2010, 8:18 am 8:18 am

Among the advanced nations of the world, no country has sunk so far and so fast when it comes to common decency as the US has under this and the previous administration. It just gets worse as wealth is transferred from the middle-class to the super-rich by collusion between our so-called representatives, Wall St., and major corporations. Many Americans will die from lack of health care. Many are currently suffering in silence now, and Obamacare will ensure that more suffer and die as the insurance companies and drug companies reap the benefits of their backroom deals with Obama. Remember that there are no caps on how high premiums can go. Most people simply won’t be able to afford the ever-increasing premiums and will be culled out, as the insurance companies get to cherry pick who they’ll cover (mainly the young and healthy). This President was quick to throw the public option out — a major betrayal of the middle class and a huge gift to the insurance and drug companies. Wendell Potter, a former PR guy with a major insurer, has blown the whistle on this time and time again. This President is a fraud who is in the pocket of the super-rich, just like George W. Bush was. The middle class is sinking into poverty status and that suits Puppet Obama and his minions just fine. Come November we all have a shovel-ready job waiting for us. Shovel each and every incumbent out of office. No Senator or member of the House of Representatives has expressed sufficient outrage at the horrific treatment of the middle class to have earned re-election. Dump them all to send a message. Then let’s dump Obama in a final effort to save our nation, which has become one of the most callous and corrupt thanks to our pandering, callous, greedy, arrogant and cowardly politicians.

Posted by: Bob W | July 8, 2010, 8:57 am 8:57 am

The silence of doctors on this whole issue is deafening. I am now convinced that a solid majority of doctors and nurses are laying low to avoid any controversy associated to them and only care that they get a nice fat paycheck. There was a time that people became MD’s as an altruistic venture. It is now a tough, but predictable above average income career choice, just like joining any of the burgeoning federal job rolls. We are going to have millions upon millions on the federal payroll who will be an elite class earning significantly more than a much larger population out in the hinterlands. It is a dangerous recipe that I fear will not end well. For any of you who are part of or plan to join this class thinking it will be a steady state of safe and cozy employment, I would be fearful. Not just because the likelyhood is that much of this will eventually be de-funded, but even if you remain in this employment, if the economy truly tanks, your relative wealth will make you a target of resentment and possibly ( and I hope not because I have children), retribution of some manner. On the current trajectory, I believe this is not certain, but very likely.

Posted by: nnizy | July 8, 2010, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Reading some of the rants from both sides makes you realize how unrational we have become in this country. The dems have long operated on the theory of divide and conquer, looks like they’ve made it. Now we are looking at having rationing, which those who voted for it, said would never happen. Do we expect anything from liars and thieves? Or maybe they aren’t as smart as they claim they are, after all, they matriculated through harvard by grade inflation. At least GW got his MBAQ before the grade inflation. :)

Posted by: JImconch | July 8, 2010, 9:41 am 9:41 am

An Everybody’s Interest Memo:
Dear Ones (all of the peoples) of OUR beautiful planet earth,
We have identified the problem and have found a “universal cure” for our worldwide political, economic and social ills, to as follows:
The Problem ( Disease and Diagnosis)
Oppressive Compulsive Greed Disorder (O.C.G.D.)
What the Deranged Greedy Elite (D.G.E.) and the world population as a direct result are suffering from.
Mode of Transmission ( Indications and Symptoms )
They perpetrate their deranged behaviors through hirelings (Useful Idiots). It is now time for all of this class of dupes, to cease being idiots for hire, and begin acting toward the universal good of humanity, toward the weal of “We The People”. Only those actions which uphold “The Life Supportive Rhythms Of Nature—For All” can be said to be universally good, good also for the Greedy Elite themselves; tormented souls long suffering under the heel of their mistaken delusions of self eloquence; ‘A small class of criminal minds their twisted intellects weave, from grand illusion’s ceaseless pain, an evil tapestry’, the feverish late stages of: Oppressive Compulsive Greed Disorder (O.C.G.D.) —word smithied into rhyme gives a sense of their opine.
The Cure (Treatment and Prognosis)
The cure is to remove the flagging degenerates from the object of their greed, obsessive amounts of greedily acquired monies which they use to leverage illicit power. This is the only sure and “universal cure”, which is also the remedy for every social malaise; including every historical form of political tyranny and WAR ; by which “We The People” are kept prey and prostrate, to receive their scourge of evil congeries, beyond our will to further endure!
Treatment Method
Jail—em all, in ‘Greedy Prison’ with only monopoly board game money and each other to deceive and corrupt at their evil play. Introduce group meditation instruction and daily puppy petting therapy, of course supervised by “We The People” to guide their progress toward, if possible, healthy social reintegration.
By: “We The People” for “We The People” thru collective awareness…

Posted by: 'We The People" | July 8, 2010, 9:50 am 9:50 am

How is playing back actual audio and video of Dr. Donald Berwick revealing his positions on rationing and the required redistributive nature of good healthcare, lying, paranoid, or conspiratorial thinking?

Posted by: Pattio | July 8, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Rationing—another way of saying “death panels.” Congrats Dems, here’s your hope and changes.

Posted by: astralweels | July 8, 2010, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Will Members of Congress still have access to Bethesda naval Hospital?

Posted by: Muhammed's Rotting Skull | July 8, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Why is everyone so upset that the government might deny you care? This whole country has been lying back and taking it from our insurance companies all this time. Dr. Berwick and Obama are making some comparisons with the UK’s model and trying to develop a model of healthcare that will work better than what we have now. Greedy companies controlling your health care whose sole aim is to prevent you from getting the care you’ve been promised. Oh yeah and to stop making all the people who do have insurance pay for those who don’t. Your emergency room visit would be a $1,000 less if everyone had insurance. Do you honestly believe our President “hates” our country? What a load of crap. No one in the UK is denied life saving care. Rationing is when someone says – this pill costs $5 and will cure what you have. This pill costs $100 and it will also cure what you have, so which one do you go with. Death panels, please can you see Russia from your house too?

Posted by: Lauren | July 8, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Berwick is aligned with the insurance (banking) industry. He is their poster boy. His Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) is a nonprofit arm of managed care. Just look at the grant-support roster. It is funded almost entirely by the insurance companies, banks and the Macy Foundation (yet another non-profit arm of the insurance industry).
Berwick’s son worked closely with Dodd on health care issues. Father and son Berwick seem to be extensions of Grassley/Frist/Dodd/HCA philosophy. What is the philosophy? Profiteering and control of all things healthcare by the insurance (banking) industry. This choreography has been going on since the inception of Kaiser Permamente, followed up by Regan’s 1980 deregulation of the insurance and medical institutions, made even stronger by the introduction of managed care, and now the Obama health plan. Who is profiting from these changes? The insurance/banking industry. Both are raking in the largest profits in their histories, at the expense of US citizens and the collapse of multiple viable businesses and one of the world’s best health care nations. Berwick appears to support patient-centered care, socialized medicine…but all these ‘innocent’ sounding concepts simply pad the pockets of managed care. As long as healthcare costs are contained, the insurance companies continue to realize even greater profit percentages.
The communications company that supports IHI happens to support communications for several of the largest banks in the world. Coincidence? I think not.
Obama prefers not to adhere to the democratic process. Unfortunately, he is a puppet for an organization that is the true leadership of our bankrupt (we don’t even have a GNP and owe trillions to China) and corrupt country. It is all quite tragic. We’ve stood by and watched as we’ve lost our country to foreign interests and greed. :(
Buckle your seat belts, it is going to be a bumpy ride.

Posted by: MedicalMind | July 8, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

I wonder if Dr. Berwick would have given the go ahead for a terminally ill 80 year old woman to get a hip replacement, even though her death would be within the next six months. This is what happened to President Obama’s grandmother.

Posted by: Minnie | July 8, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Obama doesn’t care about health care, it’s about money and power.
I think he killed his grandmother to keep her from telling the world he was born in Kenya, so he could continue to lie and hide his background, steal the presidency – money and power.

Posted by: richard | July 8, 2010, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

So when someone gets a death sentence by the Death Czar refusing, I mean, rationing their health care needs to someone else…that someone has nothing left to lose by taking out their rage on a government wonk somewhere. Very short-sighted. But then, its Washington doing what Washington does.

Posted by: Georgia Jeff | July 8, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Well, well, well…everything we said all along is finally dawning on those who’ve been asleep.
He said he’d redistribute wealth & said he wanted everyone on the government dole. Common sense tells you it would be rationed and be disastrous. In case we forgot, our national debt is so steep it will never be paid so there’s consequently no money to give everyone healthcare. Lets stop being emotional!
Why is it that conservatives knew all this before? And I don’t want to hear that Insurance Companies ration either. Have you checked out what their profit margin is? Nearly nill. It’s less than 3%, so that argument is a crock. If they were raking people over the coals for profit, they’d have a bigger margin than that.

Posted by: TheConservative | July 8, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Smell it? It’s there…again! The stench of racial hatred and the cauldron is bubbling anew. This time it will be cultural, economic and political. Blacks cannot accept they are now third-rate while whites have slipped to second-rate and Hispanics are rocketing to the top of the heap and with some 75 years of lawless government experience what makes you think they’ll abide by anything other than what they want.
BTW: Obama and his cronies must be removed from office soon, if not now, and certainly before 2012. But, the next bunch had darn-well have a nation-wide game plan for all or they too will be removed…maybe forcefully.

Posted by: tmbttd | July 8, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Where are the moderate Democrats? They sit back and watch this questionable activity and say nothing.
What’s happened to the Democratic Party?

Posted by: Bill | July 8, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

“Remember that “study” or report from Leftwing Berkeley faculty or associated as to deriding “Conservatives” and “rightwingers” as somehow mentally defective?”
Sharron Angle and Sarah Palin would seem to be exhibits A & B.
“It’s been roundly denounced as unreliable (no surprise there)”
By right wingers who were angry that the truth being told.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 8, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

“Myself, I will die with the flag raised and gun in hand.”
Just make sure you only take yourself and no innocents like other right wing nutjobs
Posted by: Ryan C
Ryan, I’m sure that you will meekly lie down and die on command like the pathetic little sheep that you are.

Posted by: Newbern W Johnson | July 8, 2010, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

This guy is a redistributionist of wealth. He will ration your health care. Death panels are coming. Thanks Comrades for destroying America…

Posted by: Scott T | July 8, 2010, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

@ Lauren:
“Do you honestly believe our President “hates” our country? What a load of crap.”
=====================================
YEEEESSSSS, Lauren.

Posted by: SurrealWorld | July 8, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I told you the Death Panels were coming, but you mocked and berated me.
See I told ya so!

Posted by: Sarah Palin | July 8, 2010, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Looks like Sara was right afterall.
I have lost my brother, sister and mom in the last 10 yrs i pitty the fool that rations the health of my father.

Posted by: sam | July 8, 2010, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

I’m still trying to figure out how 28 is almost half of 189. The people who figured that one up are probably the same ones who hird census workers, then laid them off, and then rehired them, thus creating “more” jobs in the process. Good grief.

Posted by: Rob | July 8, 2010, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

oops, should be “hired” not “hird”.

Posted by: Rob | July 8, 2010, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Bush didn’t appoint Marxists therefore his administration had less objection to their appointments.

Posted by: Karen | July 8, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

With “Our Eyes Open”…
Orwell himself could do no better.

Posted by: wpp | July 9, 2010, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Your question:
Where are the moderate Democrats? They sit back and watch this questionable activity and say nothing.
What’s happened to the Democratic Party?
Answer:
They are over there hugging a bunch of Muslims.

Posted by: ringmaster76120 | July 9, 2010, 3:49 am 3:49 am

President Lyndon Johnson moved social security funds, into a general fund…which they spent! $2.5 TRILLION they used up, never paid back!
Now they will ration health care to our senior citizens, disabled and tell these citizens, “too bad, you are on your own”, or like Obama said, “Maybe Grannie should take a pain pill, instead of a medical treatment.”!!!
These elite politicians will always have access to the best health care because they can pay for it. This is what is going on in other socialized countries…the rich get in first because they pay cash…their serfs have to wait months on end!

Posted by: dareisay | July 9, 2010, 8:07 am 8:07 am

To those that mocked Gov. Palin for stating what is coming true….shame on you!

Posted by: dareisay | July 9, 2010, 8:08 am 8:08 am

I notice that he says social funds are limited. We shouldn’t be paying for so many things with ‘social funds’. How about if we let people pay for health care with ‘private funds’? How about if we stop letting the government take so much money from those who work for their ‘social funds’? The founders are rolling over in their graves. If we keep this up, we will be bankrupt like Greece, Spain, etc.

Posted by: BernieG | July 9, 2010, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Thanks Mr. Tapper for your fair reporting on this news item. Mr. Tapper is a welcome voice in what I see as generally a leftist and corrupt mainstream media, including most reporters and editors. Would it be that there are more people with the courage and integrity like that of Mr. Tapper.

Posted by: Don in Campbell | July 9, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

That’s because everyone that Obama tries to appoint has socialist, communist or other radical leanings. He is not picking good people, just radicals to force his agenda down our throats.

Posted by: Ron | July 10, 2010, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Don’t feel sorry for Republicans, they welcome debate. The only problem is that liberals find it difficult to deal with the facts.

Posted by: Ron | July 10, 2010, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

On Sarah Palin’s first week in office, Congress should deem and pass legislation to repeal Obamacare.

Posted by: SarahWasRight | July 10, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

No time to ‘waste with Washington game playing’? There’s been nothing BUT game playing here. Berwick got a recess appt after stalling the Pub’s for two reasons: the Dems can’t defend their healthcare bill, and they sure as hell don’t want to publicize or talk about it this close to mid-terms. So they shut it down.
Abuse of power. Again. Transparency is one promise they can’t break no matter how hard they try.

Posted by: Recon | July 10, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Being denied care in the US is the exception. Other hospitals because it is no more associated with a medical school. Community Health Center includes all of the county. They rake in millions in funding every year. Their CEO makes big salary. They are also to be reimbursed for Medicare and Medicaid patients. They are governed by a board consisting of at least 51% of patients. They represent the community in service of economic, ethnic and gender status. It’s tough to get a homeless representative to the meeting. In most cases, patients have the knowledge with no financial, budget, finance, and the provision of health care. While it IS important to have their input, sad ….

Posted by: Recharddo | July 16, 2010, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.