Senate Candidate Ken Buck: Liberal Movement is ‘Largest Threat’ to America, More Than al Qaeda or Iran
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Republican Senate candidate Ken Buck last week distanced himself from former Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., when Tancredo called President Obama “the greatest threat to our way of life.” On ABC/Washington Post’s “Top Line,” Buck, R-Colo., clarified his statement, saying that it’s the “progressive liberal movement” that he thinks is the “largest threat” to the country, not the president himself. That movement poses a bigger threat than al Qaeda or Iran, he said. “I said at the time that I did not agree with Tom Tancredo in the sense that — I think what is going on right now, with the deficit spending and the huge debt and unfunded liabilities, as you just mentioned, is a huge threat,” Buck, the district attorney of Weld County, Colo., told us. “And I think that the president is leading a progressive liberal movement that is causing, to a certain extent, the threat. Certainly, we had deficit spending under President Bush and in the Republican Congress — House and Senate. But I think the largest threat we really have is the progressive liberal movement. I think if Barack Obama stepped down tomorrow, we would still have that threat.”
Asked specifically if the threat from liberals is greater than that posed by al Qaeda or Iran, or terrorist groups broadly, Buck said: “I believe that, because if we continue to spend the way we’re spending, we will not have the ability to focus on those external threats that you just mentioned.” Buck – a favorite of the Tea Party movement – has taken heat for calling Social Security “horrible, bad policy.” But he said today that it’s important for Congress to protect Social Security from cuts in “any way.” “No, I don’t support getting rid of Social Security. I think the most important thing we can do is to make sure we keep the promise that we have made to seniors. What I was referring to there — I think earlier, there was a question about taking the funds out of the Social Security trust fund and putting IOUs in that trust fund so that members of Congress could vote for and fund pork-barrel projects in their districts. And I think that is a horrible policy,” he said. “I think we’ve made a promise in Social Security. I think we need to make sure that the promise is just as viable today as it was 20 years ago, and I think we need to make sure that we have a program that our younger generation of workers believes in and believes it will be in place when they get around to the point where they’re ready to retire,” Buck said. “I think that Social Security is a viable program and can be made viable with sitting down with some people that are very knowledgeable in the area and figuring out what to do. I don’t think Social Security needs — in any way — to be cut,” he added. As for budget items he would cut: “We need to look at the Constitution as a guide to what the federal government should be involved in, what they shouldn’t be involved in,” Buck said. “There are some programs — the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, things like that — that I don’t think the federal government needs to be doing when we’re in the situation that we’re in right now. Those are not big-ticket items. The big-ticket items, I think, are gonna require a lot of thought and a lot of discussion in the United States Senate, and I can’t sit here and go through the budget line-by-line with you and tell you, ‘These are the things that I would cut.’ ” Buck is locked in a tight primary with Jane Norton, a former Colorado lieutenant governor who is enjoys the backing of much of the GOP establishment. “My opponent has supported the largest tax increase in the history of the state of Colorado. I support term limits on senators and members of the House; she does not,” Buck said. “There are a number of policy differences, and really, when I started this campaign, I started running by going to all 64 counties and building a grass-roots base. She started with a top-down model. And when we go to DC, our allegiance would be to two different entities. And my allegiance will be to the citizens of Colorado who got me there.” Watch the full interview with Ken Buck HERE. For our “Post Politics” segment, we checked in with Ed O’Keefe of The Washington Post on the crowded legislative agenda, plus a new survey of federal workers that shows employees of the Office of Management and Budget to be particularly disaffected with their agency’s leadership. Watch the portion of the program with Ed O’Keefe HERE.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Liberal is not a bad word. However, liberals tend to spend too much on social programs, thinking they can save people from themselves.
Experience has shown us time and again, that you cannot save people from themselves.
Spending on social programs, to help people do nothing for themselves, simply makes those people entirely dependent, and not independent. That is bad for America, and bad for the individual as well.
If you are going to spend monies to help people, put it where it offers incentive, and not dependence.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | July 12, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Don’t forget the suicide financial bombers at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.
Posted by: Huh | July 12, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Me thinks Ron Paul is making inroads.
Posted by: Huh | July 12, 2010, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
How about we end some of the corporate welfare? Why does a super rich hedge fund manner pulling down a huge income still get to pay only a 15% tax rate and other poor slobs making less than half a billion pay 27%?
too many republicans still fighting tooth and nail for the super elite – who have pretty much drained opportunity dry.
Posted by: trueblue | July 12, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
To someone THAT far off the scale to the right I guess almost anything else seems “left.” Doesn’t he know the world is flat and he’s going to fall of the extreme right side?!~
Posted by: Michael Reynolds | July 12, 2010, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Rick McDaniel | Jul 12, 2010 3:46:25 PM posted: “Spending on social programs, to help people do nothing for themselves, simply makes those people entirely dependent, and not independent. That is bad for America, and bad for the individual as well.”
Rick, can you site where you found this information? Check out the 2008 US Dept of Health and Human Services report to Congress called “Indicators of Welfare Independence”. According to this report, the majority of people on welfare use it as a stop gap measure. It is a conservative myth that social programs are somehow “bad for America”.
The truth is that after 8 years of dismal job growth (only 3 Million new jobs during the Bush era), and while those same years generated more wealth than ever, America’s poverty rolls increased from 31.6 Million in 2001 to nearly 40 Million in 2008.
Conservatives like to talk about a choice between big government and small government. Well, now that our economy pushed Millions of people into poverty over the past decade – families, children, unemployed – what should we do? The real debate is over what kind of nation America should be, what are our priorities, and where should our federal money be directed.
Posted by: green.goddess | July 12, 2010, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Yes YEs YES be afraid of the democrats they are responsible for the war in Iraq for you spouses cheating for the economy crashing for all the ills of the world. That the republican stratagy lie scare fear blame more fear more lies rinse and repeat. Havent the american people after so many years of this same tactic caught on to it yet or are we really the stupid sheep the GOP hopes we are?
Posted by: mike | July 12, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Spending on social programs, to help people do nothing for themselves, simply makes those people entirely dependent, and not independent.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel *************************
Gee Rick, the so called tea bag and GOP savior
Scott Brown was a welfare recipient himself.
You lost all credibility on that theory. LOL!
Posted by: spacerook1 | July 12, 2010, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
These worthless bureacrats, have been looting social security since the 50′s or earlier and now that its time to pay the piper, they would like nothing more than to do away with it, in another robbery of the poor, i tell you something though, when you cut it off you will definately have your hands full of people who paid into the system for years and years, and them tell them tuff turkey, marshall law wouldn’t even help then.
Posted by: Sideeous | July 13, 2010, 12:38 am 12:38 am
It is upsetting to me to find that more and more divisive political tactics are used at a time when the U.S. needs a calming influence. This clown, added to Newt Gingrich announcing a possible Presidential run, certainly screwed up my morning.
No President is perfect, and I’m not happy with some of what Obama has done and is doing, but he still has to play with the house deck, and the cards that were dealt him.
We’ve reached a point as a country where the politicians believe that the public lacks even a grain of sense; the politicos and pundits then go on record as being idiots in the expectation it will get them elected.
Are we looking at a Palin/Gingrich slate in 2012?
Posted by: Charlie Self | July 13, 2010, 5:20 am 5:20 am
Oh goodie. Another GOP politician who revises his statements when confronted with them. Even the revisions are weak. Just more whining and no solutions. Just more devisivness and no desire for unity. The people are tired of the GOP hate.
Posted by: Wayne | July 13, 2010, 8:20 am 8:20 am