By Jaketapper

Jul 14, 2010 1:08pm

White House Report: Recovery Act Saved Millions of Jobs, Boosted Economic Growth

ABC News’ Karen Travers reports: The Obama Administration said today that its economic policies, especially the Recovery Act, have boosted growth and employment in the United States at a pace quicker than anticipated. As polls show that Americans are increasingly concerned about the state of the economy, Vice President Biden repeated a mantra that has been heard quite often from him, President Obama and other administration officials – the policies they put in place are working to turn things around. “We knew if we didn't act and we didn't act boldly, the best estimates were telling us that we would lose another 4 to 5 million jobs immediate — in that year,” the vice president said. “Well, we did act, and I stand before you today to say to you that not only the recovery act, which we're talking about here in this quarterly report to the Congress, but the economic initiatives we took, they are working.” Today Biden heaped credit on the Recovery Act as the driver behind economic growth. “We would be barely growing at all, were it not to have passed in the first place and been implemented,” he said in an event at the White House’s Eisenhower Executive Office Building.  A quarterly report from the White House’ Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) states that the Recovery Act has raised employment by between 2.5 million and 3.6 million jobs and raised the nation’s GDP last quarter by between 2.7 percent-3.2 percent. “By this estimate, the recovery act has met the president's goal of saving or creating 3-1/2 million jobs two quarters earlier than anticipated,” said chair of the CEA, Christina Romer. “Everyone now acknowledges there would be somewhere between 2.5 (million) and 3.6 million fewer jobs available today, fewer people working today, were it not for the Recovery Act,” Biden said. The CEA report says that after the stimulus act went into effect, “the trajectory of the economy changed dramatically. Real GDP began to grow steadily starting in the third quarter of 2009 and private payroll employment has increased by nearly 600,000 since its low point in December 2009. It also notes that the impact of the stimulus act “increased substantially” in the first quarter of 2010 and again in the second quarter and that government investments in infrastructure, clean energy projects and technology increased by roughly 50 percent between the first six months of this year. The full CEA report can be found here: Romer touted the success the Recovery Act has had with partnering public investment with private and other funds. “We find that roughly $100 billion of recovery act funds use leverage and that these provisions are encouraging co- investment in a wide range of areas,” she said, citing clean energy, economic development and building construction as the main areas where this is evident. “We estimate that the $100 billion in recovery act funds will partner with close to 300 billion (dollars) of other funds, the majority of which are from the private sector. That is, $1 of recovery act funds is matched by almost $3 of other funds.” Biden compared Obama’s actions on the Recovery Act to that of President Abraham Lincoln establishing the Union Pacific Railroad Company in the middle of the Civil War. “You say, Joe, what's that have to do with anything? Well, the idea was that the federal government provide initial funding for a company and for the start of a major transportation infrastructure project,” the vice president said. “I'm not saying it would have never happened, but it would not have happened in the 1860s, 1870s, or 1880s,” he added. “It all started with the federal government making the down payment. Private capital poured in, and the industries created, that literally changed our way of life and grew this nation.” -Karen Travers

User Comments

LOL!!

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

I guess riding the tax payer supported Amtrak system for all those years makes it seem like it was money well spent to crazy uncle Joe.
Does anyione have a calculator that can devide $900 billion by 3.5 million? Mine must not be working because it shows about $250k per job. Unless all of the new jobs are working for the fed, I must be making a mistake.

Posted by: TucsonWilly | July 14, 2010, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

If you tell a lie often enough, people will believe it. Too bad ABC is in the herd of sheep, being willing to be led around and fed this junk.

Posted by: clint | July 14, 2010, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Does the White House actually believe this, or are they trying their hand at comedy now? I figure w/ Biden’s latest appearance on Leno, maybe that’s the case?

Posted by: Obama, the Second Coming | July 14, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

DO NOT PLAY INTO THE FEAR!!!!
I know many people who have gone back to work. My employer alone has doubled the new job openings and friends in Wichita say many people are getting called back to the airline manufacturing industry.
DO NOT FORGET – the great depression lasted for years. Our economy is slowly getting better.
BE PATIENT – Noone, I say onone can fix this mess over night.
Put your political feelings back in the toilet and start thinking and doing the right things!
Just more people playing the politics game. What a waste of time for them.

Posted by: jackson | July 14, 2010, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Funny stuff from one of the dimmest administrations ever!! So if their projection were that we would lose 20 million jobs, would they have create 17 million jobs? What a bunch of clowns. HEY OB!!! Just look at the private sector jobs added report by month, simple addition and most of it has nothing to do with the porkulus.

Posted by: Tony T | July 14, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Here is the basic formula: the more you GROW government, the more the private economy SHRINKS. You want jobs, you have to make big cuts to government and taxes, which is the opposite of what our illustrious leaders are doing. They continue to grow government and spend/waste all of the money that is needed for investment in the private sector to create jobs. So, unemployment will continue to rise.

Posted by: JMo | July 14, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

This is serious propaganda from the CEA. I’m sure they have the brawn to believe themselves despite the facts, but their claims do not pass the smell test. With unemployment at 9.5%, at best, Obama ‘reduced’ unemployment by 0.4% from the 9.9% peak.
This result is far worse than the 7% unemployment rate Obama predicted when he made the stimulus the law of the land.
How many times can they try to fool us? I suppose, as long as the press is willing to let their unsubstantiated and biased claims slide.

Posted by: Mike, CO | July 14, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

We have two saved city worker jobs listed as saved for my home town of 5,000 – except no one knows who they are!
The paving crew that spent about 6 weeks in the county last year added another half dozen. Gee, I wonder if they get counted each time they begin a new stretch of road?
Crazy Uncle Joe needs to polish the beads on his abacus.

Posted by: morgan | July 14, 2010, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Tony T writes: Funny stuff from one of the dimmest administrations ever!!
————————————–
You were talking about the Bush admin, right?
Hey lets not regulate anyone; they’re all christians in this precious christian country. Big banks and business would never act un-christian, OOPS guess not.
Hey lets start a bogus war to find WMDs. Thoudsands dead; no WMDs, OOPS again!
Hey lets create the FIRST stimulus package. Oh that’s right the right wingers keep forgetting that one! hmmm

Posted by: jackson | July 14, 2010, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

If it wasnt so pathetic, ths would make a great knock knock joke

Posted by: Scott | July 14, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

When will someone finally tell the emperor that he has no clothes?

Posted by: J.R. | July 14, 2010, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Obama Administration Approves First Direct Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Through New High-Risk Insurance Pools..His pledge was a sham
Obama VS america

Posted by: Yep I said that | July 14, 2010, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

CBS SHOCK POLL: 13% believe President’s policies have helped them…
‘White House waving white flag’…
Panic button…
Obama VS America

Posted by: Yep I said that | July 14, 2010, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

NASA Outreach Program ‘Confirmed’ Despite White House Denial, Rep Says
Gonna ask Gibbs about this one JAke????
Obama VS America

Posted by: Yep I said that | July 14, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

None of you repubs out there wanna talk about the first stimulus package put together by Georgie Bushie and highly supported by the Repub congress? HMMM anyone?
Once again, can’t blame Obama. Looks like Georgie Bushie screwed this one up too!

Posted by: jackson | July 14, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

So, remember, when you blame Obama about the stimulus packages you are actully blaming Bush!

Posted by: jackson | July 14, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Jackson – most conservatives laughed at Bush and Pelosi’s “booster shot” stimulus that sent checks out to everyone like that would prevent a recession. Nice try though buddy.
Lesson – government policies just distort markets. Cash for clunkers increased sales during that time period, but all it really did was accelerate sales from the future. What do we see now, slow car sales. Same for the stupid homebuyers credit. A lot of houses sold during that time, probably at inflated prices, and what’s happening now that it expired, a death spiral of home sales.
Nice try though. Next time, allow conservatives to speak for themselves and just try to make good coherent arguments for your own beliefs.

Posted by: Aaron | July 14, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Aaaron writes: most conservatives laughed at Bush and Pelosi’s “booster shot” stimulus that sent checks out to everyone like that would prevent a recession. Nice try though buddy.
————————————–
Really? Laughed? At King George Bush?
laughed? You’ve got to be kidding. I’ve never seen or heard a conservative repub ever laugh at King George. From what I gather, all you repubs would vote that “laughed” at joke back in office. Nice try to you Buddy!

Posted by: jackson | July 14, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahah AND ON AND ON AND ON………….

Posted by: jackson | July 14, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

“Once again, can’t blame Obama. Looks like Georgie Bushie screwed this one up too!”
The only thing this statement illustrates is your lack of coherent thought. So are you saying that the stimulus is working or not?
Let’s leave alone the fact that the Recovery Act, aka stimulus bill, had nothing to do with the TARP program that Bush initiated (wrongly in my opinion, but reasonable people disagree). You seem to be suggesting that Bush screwed up Obama’s recovery act while glorifying the result.
Your statements are contradictory. Of course it must be hard to keep all of these faux jobs and baseless statistics straight in a failed attempt to show some sort of economic recovery.

Posted by: J.R. | July 14, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

And without government spending? According to studies by economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, without government assistance during such a nasty economic downturn, global jobless rates historically have risen for FIVE YEARS.
That means US jobless numbers could have been climbing until 2012. Recovery Act spending helped our nation dodge another Great Depression.

Posted by: green.goddess | July 14, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” – Joseph Goebbels

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

When Obama took office the economy had been shrinking at an annual rate of 6.4% and employment had already stalled a decade of outsourcing and the worst job growth on record – a pathetic 3 Million jobs in 8 years. There was no job creation engine in place in 2007 when our nation fell into this Recession.
Obama’s first focus was to recapitalize banks and return the economy to growth. Without that action, the jobless rate would be even higher.
And, according to testimony today by the Economic Policy Institute, “the Recovery Act worked as advertised. It created almost 5 Million full-time equivalent jobs and kept the unemployment rate from sitting well over 11% today.” Unfortunately, the economic crisis Obama inherited will require much more than $787 Billion.
google today’s testimony “An Assessment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.”

Posted by: green.goddess | July 14, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

This is a claim that they really can’t substantiate. I would say that the job market would be a lot better if Obama would resign.

Posted by: Jeff | July 14, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

“When Obama took office the economy had been shrinking at an annual rate of 6.4% and employment had already stalled a decade of outsourcing and the worst job growth on record – a pathetic 3 Million jobs in 8 years. There was no job creation engine in place in 2007 when our nation fell into this Recession. ”
And who had control of the House, and Senate, and budgets in 2007? That’s right. Democrats.

Posted by: Jean | July 14, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Every morning team Obama meets to prepare its daily baloney sandwhich. Upon completion it is carefully inserted into the whirring blades of the white house PR fan for immediate dissemination. The eager press corps fight each other over the processed chunks, mold them into nuggets of news and babble about the blubber until the next batch is sprayed out…yup, another day, another spray.

Posted by: cindy | July 14, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

“You’ve got to be kidding. I’ve never seen or heard a conservative repub ever laugh at King George. ”
Obviously from your ramblings, you have never read a conservative publication. There were plenty of outspoken conservative critics of GWB. That’s not to say they disagreed with him all the time, mind you, but it still shows your statement to be pure folly.
“From what I gather, all you repubs would vote that “laughed” at joke back in office. ”
I am a conservative who disagreed with GWB on numerous issues, but I voted for him twice and I would vote for him again if the choice was him or Obama. OF course that can’t happen, but it would be an interesting poll question.

Posted by: J.R. | July 14, 2010, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Just a simple question: If MILLIONS of jobs have been saved and/or created, why did the Democrats throw such a fit when unemployment benefit extensions did not get passed? If THAT many jobs have become available, and the job market is now THAT good, why the benefits? Shouldn’t everyone be working by now? I think the Obama/Biden road show needs to get on a page where the dialogue doesn’t contradict itself.

Posted by: Shoe | July 14, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

green.goddess: “That means US jobless numbers could have been climbing until 2012.”
Um, they’re still climbing. From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
- In June, the employment level fell by 301,000 worksers, the third montly decline in a row
- Assuming the labor force to be a constant percentage of the population, unemployment rose in June to 11.5% from 11.2% in May
- The number of unemployed Amercians rose to over 18 million in June, the 2nd increase in a row
- U6a, the broader measure of unemployment, spiked above 20% again, rising to 20.4% from 19.9% in May
No Hopey-Changey here!
You see, if the economy truly is doing better, you don’t need to keep telling people. The common man on the street knows it.

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

How do you create that many jobs and still have 17% REAL unemployment?
In 2006 the Dems said, “Hey, let us run things for a while. We can screw things up better than you can.” And, so they took control of Congress in 2006 and the Presidency in 2008, and guess what? They were right, they have screwed things up better that the Reps could. The question will be, “Which party can reinvent themselves with the platform of watching out for the people?” I mean, REALLY watching out for the people, because we are starting to wake up and mobilize to take our country back from the Self-Serving. Are there any REAL statesmen/women in the land that are willing to jump on the “Watching out for ALL the people” bandwagon? Only time will tell.

Posted by: DL13 | July 14, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Mary | Jul 14, 2010 3:21:46 PM – “You see, if the economy truly is doing better, you don’t need to keep telling people. The common man on the street knows it.”
You mean like the post below from jackson | Jul 14, 2010 1:43:49 PM? “I know many people who have gone back to work. My employer alone has doubled the new job openings and friends in Wichita say many people are getting called back to the airline manufacturing industry.”
Yes, the Recession is not over and people are still unemployed. But it appears you missed the first part from the Bureau of Labor’s web site:
“Both the number of unemployed persons, at 14.6 million, and the unem-
ployment rate, at 9.5 percent, edged down in June.”

Posted by: green.goddess | July 14, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

green.goddess: “Unfortunately, the economic crisis Obama inherited will require much more than $787 Billion.”
Most of the so-called “stimulus” bill wasn’t stimulative. It mostly contained non-stimulative money like extended unemployment benefits and payoffs to Democratic donors and cronies (which did not cause organic growth of jobs in the private sector–the whole purpose of stimulus). It’s estimated 40% of the money still hasn’t been spent. But I’m sure a lot of that cash will be released just prior to the 2010 elections. There are votes to be bought.
Incidentally, Obama was a US Senator in 2007. He never made any public statements warning us that a financial crisis was imminent. The truth is, as a huge proponent of subprime lending, he participated in creating the crisis he claims he inherited. Day by day, it’s clear to everyone but the True Believers that the man is a pathological liar.

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Be prepared for more of this political rhetoric between now and November. As sure as the sun will rise.

Posted by: LongT | July 14, 2010, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Shoe, why do the Dems throw a fit when unemploment isn’t extended? Well, my friend who has been unemployed for a year with his wife earning over $100K is counting on those extensions, that’s why!!…how else are they going to pay for their $8,000 vacation condo rental in a few days? Heavens man!Like Ms. Pelosi said, unemployment is grreat stimulus..they will pay the maid with it, the bell man, the guy who brings them the drinks with little umbrellas..

Posted by: cindy | July 14, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

green.goddess: “Both the number of unemployed persons, at 14.6 million, and the unemployment rate, at 9.5 percent, edged down in June.”
That’s a distortion of what happened. We know the number of unemployed increased. The unemployment rate of 9.5% was made possible only by the government’s assumption that 652,000 workers exited the labor force in June, apparently no longer needing a source of income to feed themselves and their families.
The total number of unemployed/underemployed people is currently at a record high of 25.2 million.
In many places, it’s far beyond Great Depression levels. The official unemployment rate of Detroit is still around 30%. The unofficial rate, according to the city’s mayor and local leaders, is believed to be closer to 50%. Luckily for Detroit, progressives have the answers. Pelosi recently claimed that unemployment checks are the fastest way to create jobs, so Detroit should be a utopia anytime now.

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Posted by: Mary | Jul 14, 2010 3:38:53 PM “Incidentally, Obama was a US Senator in 2007. He never made any public statements warning us that a financial crisis was imminent…the man is a pathological liar.”
LOL Mary! Come on! Even Fed Chairman Greenspan didn’t “warn” the Bush Administration about an imminent financial crisis.
Back in 2006, one economist, Noriel Roubini, warned the IMF that: “The United States was likely to face a once-in-a-lifetime housing bust, an oil shock, sharply declining consumer confidence, and, ultimately, a deep recession”. He was practically laughed out of the meeting.
Few in the financial community embraced the idea that a “financial crisis was imminent”, much less our Congress creatures on either side.

Posted by: green.goddess | July 14, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Mary – sorry I actually have to bail on blogging today – have to get back to work – those pesky customers are buying more at my small business.
But here’s some interesting reading from today’s House Budget Committee meeting: google “An Assessment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.”

Posted by: green.goddess | July 14, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

green.goddess: “Few in the financial community embraced the idea that a “financial crisis was imminent”, much less our Congress creatures on either side.”
Not true. Lots of fiscal conservatives saw this coming as early as 2003. Peter Schiff even published a book warning about it in 2005. He attacked both political parties for creating the conditions of the crisis, so of course he was attacked. His predictions were pretty much dead on. Some listened and prepared by rapidly shedding debt and building cash. Most ignored him. Bet they wish they listened now.

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2010, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

You know, the WH needs to learn that when people stop believing what you are selling, you either need to change the product, or change the salesperson. They won’t do the first, but we can do the second

Posted by: DJ | July 14, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I like to talk about facts: President Bush did not manage the country well. However, President Obama has dramatically increased the debt and deficits. President Obama promised to be different, but he is more of the same and worse!

Posted by: Dave | July 14, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

The two questions which jump out are, what did the average job save cost in dollars and what will happen to the same job once the recovery act’s money is depleted?

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 14, 2010, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I think most agreed that a financial disaster was a high probability and that soon the ‘small people’ would have trouble redeeming their assets from the banks and funds.. I actually had money in a 401K frozen.. for several months.. it was personally .. disconcerting.

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 14, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

dan: “Obama wrote a letter to Bernake in March of 2007 warning of an impending housing and foreclosure crisis.”
Was Obama on all the major networks making these statements? Did he call for the regulation of Fannie and Freddie to reign in the rampant corruption there?
Like I said before, Peter Schiff was warning us back in 2005 in a thick, widely published BOOK. What was Obama doing back then? Why, he was actively working with ACORN to push banks to…gasp…engage in more SUBPRIME lending to minorities! Stanley Kurtz, a Harvard scholar, documented this extensively back in 2008. Obama participated in the activities that led to the financial crisis. It’s not even disputable.

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Obama should have used all of his book money to buy credit default swaps (since he had such a forward looking perspective)

Posted by: Dontget818 | July 14, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

It absolutley saved jobs. Since I work in public education it saved my job and many other in the education field like myself. What’s bad are those who fail to realize that so many teachers jobs were, and are still at risk because of budget shortfalls. Teachers, police and other vital personnel lose their jobs when states don’t recieve tax revenues people.

Posted by: TV | July 14, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

“Did he call for the regulation of Fannie and Freddie to reign in the rampant corruption there?
McClatchy: Between 2004 and 2006, when subprime lending was exploding, Fannie and Freddie went from holding a high of 48 percent of the subprime loans that were sold into the secondary market to holding about 24 percent, according to data from Inside Mortgage Finance, a specialty publication”

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

“Did he call for the regulation of Fannie and Freddie to reign in the rampant corruption there?
McClatchy: Between 2004 and 2006, when subprime lending was exploding, Fannie and Freddie went from holding a high of 48 percent of the subprime loans that were sold into the secondary market to holding about 24 percent, according to data from Inside Mortgage Finance, a specialty publication”

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

“Stanley Kurtz, a Harvard scholar”
ROFLMAO!

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2010, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

“Why, he was actively working with ACORN to push banks to…gasp…engage in more SUBPRIME lending to minorities!”
Why do right wingers think its ok to deny someone a loan based on their skin color or neighborhood versus their individual credit worthiness?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

dan | Jul 14, 2010 4:31:57 PM posted “Obama wrote a letter to Bernake in March of 2007 warning of an impending housing and foreclosure crisis.”
Along with Mary, I did not know this. Thanks dan. It is reassuring to see we have a prescient President.
And Mary, it is simplistic to state that Freddie & Fannie & Obama were the cause of this financial crisis. The U.S. economy is far more complicated. The housing bubble was caused by “layered irresponsibility … with hard-working homeowners and billionaire villains each playing a role,” according to the Economist Magazine – their list of primary causes included:
Federal Reserve cheap credit
Congressional mortgage tax deduction
Real Estate Agents
The Clinton Administration’s less stringent requirements for low income people
Mortgage Brokers and Greenspan who pushed ARMs
Wall Street’s bundling of risky loans into securities
The Bush Administration’s lax government oversight of the securities market
And, delusional home buyers who figured prices would always go up
Obama’s name was not on the list.

Posted by: green.goddess | July 14, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Any Republican president trying to take credit for “jobs saved” would be rightly roundly panned in the media… Why should Mr. Obama receive special license?

Posted by: Quo Warranto? | July 14, 2010, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

So if I decide not to spend $1,000,000 that I do not have, do I get credit for “saving” $1,000,000?
If I decide not to eat 2 Big Macs every day for 2 months, do I get credit for “saving” 10 pounds of fat I otherwise would have gained?
This administration is ridiculous. And dangerously (intentionally?) incompetent.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 15, 2010, 12:52 am 12:52 am

“Why do right wingers think its ok to deny someone a loan based on their skin color or neighborhood versus their individual credit worthiness?”
Why do left wingers think it is ok to distort the truth?

Posted by: tjp612 | July 15, 2010, 12:54 am 12:54 am

I have no idea why this administration is stuck on this 3 million jobs saved figure.
What’s wrong with 6, 7 or even 10 million jobs saved?
Why low ball the spin?
It makes no sense.

Posted by: Noz | July 15, 2010, 10:35 am 10:35 am

“President Obama’s spending very likely saved the country and possibly the world from a complete economic breakdown.Posted by: kramer | Jul 14, 2010 4:56:28 PM”
Bush initiated the TARP, to stabilize the banks, Pres. Obama stimulus was nothing but a payoff to his supporters and states that voted him into office. Pres. Obama quadruplet the debt of ALL Presidents in just 18 months, just wait and see what he can do in 4 years????? Bankruptcy or inflation here we come. Which do you think will be better????????

Posted by: Lizzie | July 15, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Noz | Jul 15, 2010 10:35:43 AM posted “I
have no idea…”
check out yesterday’s testimony to Congress, “An Assessment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.”

Posted by: green.goddess | July 15, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am

“check out yesterday’s testimony to Congress” – green.goddess
Oh, did someone from the administration use a higher jobs saved spin figure than the 3 million yesterday?
If so good for them.
10 million sounds a lot better than 3 million.

Posted by: Noz | July 15, 2010, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

From Reuters (July 15, 2010):
Banks repossessed a record number of U.S. homes in the second quarter, but slowed new foreclosure notices to manage distressed properties on the market, real estate data company RealtyTrac said on Thursday.
The root problems of job losses and wage cuts persist, making a sustained U.S. housing recovery elusive.
Banks took control of 269,962 properties in the second quarter, up 5 percent from the prior quarter and a 38 percent spike from the second quarter of last year, RealtyTrac said in its midyear 2010 foreclosure report.
Repossessions will likely top 1 million this year.
“The underlying conditions haven’t improved,” RealtyTrac senior vice president Rick Sharga said in an interview.
The housing market still grapples with “unemployment, economic displacement in general, and still sits on over 5 million seriously delinquent loans that in all likelihood will at some point go into foreclosure,” he said.
———-
So foreclosures are WAY up this year compared to last year, and it’s primarily due to job losses. The Obama administration didn’t mention this. Weird.

Posted by: Mary | July 15, 2010, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Some of you seem like fairly intelligent people. I just can’t believe what I’m reading. How’s that change working out for you now? At what point does one start taking accountability and making change that is actually good for Americans? When does the corruption stop? Will the politicians join hands and minds and start working for the good of this wonderful country? For freedom? For American values? For the future of our children? Let’s all commit to make change in our own hearts first, pray for change that will truly help save our country. Let’s all start making a personal impact. That’s the only way.Learn from mistakes of the past, correct and forge forward for a better tomorrow.

Posted by: CD | July 16, 2010, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.