White House to Shirley Sherrod: Mea Culpa
“Just a few minutes ago I had the opportunity and the privilege to talk to Shirley Sherrod on the phone,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told reporters late this afternoon. “I wanted to offer my personal and profound apologies for the pain and discomfort that’s been caused to her and her family over the last several days.”
Vilsack said he caught Sherrod in the airport on her way up to New York City from Atlanta and “she was extraordinarily gracious.” He said he told her that he “regretted the circumstances” that led to her resignation and he “took full responsibility for them.”
“I did not think before I acted,” Vilsack said, explaining that he was on the road Monday and had only read a partial transcript of her remarks.
The former governor of Iowa said he asked Sherrod “if she would be interested in figuring out a way forward,” indicating he offered her a job having to do with various legal claims against the Agriculture Department by women and minority farmers who claim that they’ve been discriminated against through the USDA loan program. Noting that Sherrod has been a claimant against the Agriculture Department, Vilsack said she “has a unique set of skills trying to turn the page on our civil rights chapter which has been difficult.”
Sherrod told him that she needed to talk it over with her family, Vilsack said.
Earlier in the day, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said that “Ms. Sherrod is owed an apology. I would do so, certainly, on behalf of this administration.”
Gibbs said that “a lot of people involved in this situation, from the government’s perspective on through, acted without all the facts.”
President Obama, Gibbs said, had been briefed on the Sherrod matter Tuesday morning and earlier Wednesday. Asked about President Obama’s personal reaction to this story, Gibbs said, “he talked about the fact that a disservice had been done here and that an injustice had happened. And that because the facts had changed, a review of the decision based on those facts should be undertaken.”
Vilsack said the decision was his and his alone to seek her resignation, that there wasn’t any White House pressure regardless of what Sherrod says undersecretary of Agriculture Cheryl Cook told her.
Gibbs said he does not think there’s any truth to the criticism that the administration overreacted because they are afraid of conservative commentators; he pointed a finger at what he called the “frenzied culture” in media where everything happens so quickly, he said.
“When one person has a story, everybody has to story, and responses are given, mistakes, in this case, clearly were made… I think all of that is involved in a larger story that combines rapid advances in technology, a whole host of things that are involved in culture and race and media and politics that have — that create an environment that we’re living in today.”
-Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Why hasn’t Holder been fired?
Ms. Sherrod was admittedly prejudiced against white people and then she saw that all people are God’s people and told a story of reconciliation, well actually it sounds like she only likes poor white people but whatev’s.
Holder as the US AG will not prosecute certain cases depending on the color of people’s skin. Why was she fired and he still has a job?
Posted by: Sensitive Sue | July 21, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Wasn’t the President on board and actually prompting Sec, Vilsack to fire Ms Sherrod? So, Should have Mr Vilsack said to the President,”We need to get all the facts first, Sir.
Posted by: pauldia | July 21, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I just don’t get it..this administration reacts to racism where it doesn’t exist (sherrod) and ignores it when it’s dressed in a para-military looking uniform holding a billy club infront of a voting station.
Posted by: cindy | July 21, 2010, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
This is the least the administration could do.
And I am glad that Vilsack admitted his mistake and is seeking to rectify it.
Meanwhile professional liar Andrew Breitbart after posting a doctored video and smearing a decent woman was last seen insisting the white farmer and his wife defending the woman were plants.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Mrs. Sherrod didn’t stutter at all when she first reported the WH forced her to resign. Now, of course, the story is morphing.
I, for one, would have liked to have seen an investigation called on the remarks and to see if this was the only instance. I am betting it isn’t.
I’d also like to see this discrimination lawsuit investigated.
Since they investigated neither before they fired her, they should at least launch one before they rehire her.
Hello, can anyone say show me the money and sweep it under the rug?
Posted by: JMW | July 21, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“…he offered her a job having to do with various legal claims against the Agriculture Department by women and minority farmers who claim that they’ve been discriminated against through the USDA loan program.”
Yet another example of identity politics and the obsession with race favored by progressives/Democrats infused within our govt. programs (paid for by ALL taxpayers). Some others:
- “Healthcare reform” legislation dictates that teaching hospitals will need to meet quotas for admittance of students from “under-represented groups” to receive grants (it’s more important to have “equal representation” than the most qualified M.D. students…note “under-represented” is used so Asians are disqualified for consideration).
- “Financial Reform” legislation includes programs to review/ensure/defend participation of women and “under-represented minorities” within financial services industry (employment preferences, transactional preferences, etc.)
- Preferential recruiting for govt. positions will be done at women’s colleges/universities
When are we going to move past identity politics? I don’t think we ever will…The race-baiting industry is too powerful/influential/malevolent (NAACP, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, etc.).
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
“Yet another example of identity politics and the obsession with race favored by progressives/Democrats infused within our govt. programs (paid for by ALL taxpayers)”
Yeah why give the woman a job that matches her experience and qualifications.
Still staying out Arizona?
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
D’oh!
Posted by: Libs and the Lying Liars Who Elect Them | July 21, 2010, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
“And that because the facts had changed, a review of the decision based on those facts should be undertaken.”
The facts didn’t change, there were NO facts when a decision was made to fire her/demand her resignation NOW, as in pull over the car and text me immediately!
Odd how yesterday the WH pinned all responsibility on Vilsack, now today Vilsack is pointing to Cook as the source of all claims about WH involvement, fear of ‘Glenn Beck’ covering the comments, etc.
I still don’t understand why she resigned rather than forcing them to fire her, and now that you mentioned her settlement w/ Giv’t in a lawsuit, I really think you need to provide a bit more detail on that lawsuit/settlement…
So, the Admin created a new position to buy off the victim of their stupid over-reaction, costin taxpayers more money because of THEIR mistake… Wow, I hope Vilsack learned his lesson – I don’t know how many more ‘special positions’ we taxpayers can afford!
Posted by: N2vip | July 21, 2010, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Ryan, as far as apologizing being the least the administration could do…do you think it is the most they will have to?
Posted by: cindy | July 21, 2010, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
And of course the little ol’ media is not to blame Jake? Even have to protect Breitbart and Fox for their role in pushing this and then CBS, ABC, NBC and CNN for always pushing the Fox storyline and you wonder why the White House has to quickly react without any facts. Fox was already is full attack mode – but hey it’s the Obama Admin for acting so hastily. And if this turned out to be legit and not a complete lie, and if the Obama administration did take time to “look for the context and talk to Ms. Sherrod” you would have been all over the administration for taking too long.
Look in the mirror for a change.
Posted by: Jones | July 21, 2010, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 21, 2010 5:55:03 PM
“Yeah why give the woman a job that matches her experience and qualifications.”
You miss the point (perhaps conveniently so, as usual). I don’t question her qualifications, I question the obsession of the federal government for positions such as these.
“Still staying out Arizona?”
I grew up <100 miles from the AZ border – Why would I avoid it? In fact, I'm hoping to get in a long weekend there in Sept. or Oct.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Meanwhile professional liar Andrew Breitbart after posting a doctored video and smearing a decent woman was last seen insisting the white farmer and his wife defending the woman were plants.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 21, 2010 5:45:14 PM
No conscience, and unwavering support from the sleazefed right only emboldens him, and ought not be surprising at this point.
The problem with Breitbart and Fox news is that their fabrications work.
And they should not. That they do is inexcusable.
I’m glad Sherrod is stepping up where the government has not.
As Glenn Greenwald noted in his piece, The heroism of Shirley Sherrod, she did the right things– she refused to slink away; she conspicuously refused to apologize for things that didnt warrant an apology;she put the blame squarely where it belonged: on Brietbart, on the NAACP for condemning her without all the facts, on Fox News, and on the administration. She refused to reward the low-life smear artists and, voila, the true facts have emerged. Now the low-life smear artists are backing her and looking for another scapegoat, but everyone except her and the white couple who came forward to defend her are clearly exposed.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
If the responsibility lies with you Vilsack then…wait for it….you need to tender your resignation immediately because this is going to cost the taxpayer huge through upcoming law suit that is coming….Geezzz don’t you guys, Obama Administration, READ ANYTHING BEFORE ACTING…..This Administration has got to be the most incompetent group of individuals in recent history…..”Teaching moments” cop-outs are wearing a little thin……Guess that only proves leading the Country cannot be a on-the-job training position…
Posted by: Parallex View | July 21, 2010, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
“The problem with Breitbart and Fox news is that their fabrications work. And they should not. That they do is inexcusable.”
But yet somehow I bet that you feel the “journalists” exposed at “Journolist” are all credible and just peachy from your POV (even though one member has been exposed as suggesting that Karl Rove and/or Fred Barnes should be called out as “racists” without any evidence in an effort to cover for Obama when his long-standing relationship with Rev. Wright threatened to derail his campaign).
Or allegations made by liberal media regarding comments/positions made by Rush Limbaugh at the time he expressed an interest in taking an ownership position in the St. Louis Rams.
Care to defend? I don’t know how you can…both examples are (by your standards) inexcusable.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Fox News did not cover this story until after she’d been fired. Fox news is not responsible for the White House’s mistake.
Posted by: MayBee | July 21, 2010, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
“But yet somehow I bet that you feel the “journalists” exposed at “Journolist” are all credible and just peachy from your POV (even though one member has been exposed as suggesting that Karl Rove and/or Fred Barnes should be called out as “racists” without any evidence in an effort to cover for Obama when his long-standing relationship with Rev. Wright threatened to derail his campaign).”
And now we have the pivot from the smear of Shirley Sherrod to the Tucker Carlson high school hissy fit because he was not allowed to join in.
“Or allegations made by liberal media regarding comments/positions made by Rush Limbaugh at the time he expressed an interest in taking an ownership position in the St. Louis Rams.”
ROFLMAO!
You mean like this?
“”NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons”"
Geee I wonder why the commish told the buying group that Rush was not welcome or that NFL players publicly stated they would not play for him.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
“Fox News did not cover this story until after she’d been fired. Fox news is not responsible for the White House’s mistake.”
This must be the new lie the right wing is passing around so we forget about the original lie and smear.
FoxNews has yet to scrub their website though.
“The Agriculture Department announced Monday, shortly after FoxNews.com published its initial report on the video, that Sherrod had resigned.”
Maybee take the lesson Vilsack had to learn the hard way and don’t believe the right wing media at face value as most often they are lying.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Just when you thought Shirley Sherrod was a noble character in this drama, she falls into the mud… In an interview with Media Matters she mischaracterizes Fox News:
“they (Fox News) are after a bigger thing, they would love to take us back to…where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person.”
Based on what evidence, Shirley?
BTW, Shirley: Have you noticed the not-so-affirmative-action hiring practices of lily-white MSNBC (a liberal/progressive favorite and entrenched Obama apologist/cheerleader)?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 21, 2010 6:47:28 PM
Yet another deflect-and-divert tactic employed by Ryan_C…. (yawn)
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Spitz…A REAL SICKO…The liberal media must be soooo proud…
Posted by: Parallex View | July 21, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Who is it that acted stupidly this time,If it sounds like a racist thing the Obama group just goes beserk.
Posted by: earl | July 21, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“they (Fox News) are after a bigger thing, they would love to take us back to…where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person.”
And FoxNews’s ceaseless coverage of the New Black Panther Party and Jeremiah Wright to say nothing of their part in the smear of Sherrod seems to support that to say nothing of their racist opinion show hosts.
“BTW, Shirley: Have you noticed the not-so-affirmative-action hiring practices of lily-white MSNBC (a liberal/progressive favorite and entrenched Obama apologist/cheerleader)?”
ROFLMAO!
So let me get this straight, Breitbart smearing this woman was ok but she better not attack your favorite propaganda station without equal time?
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
“The Agriculture Department announced Monday, shortly after FoxNews.com published its initial report on the video, that Sherrod had resigned.”
====
Yes, it was on their website, not on air.
I’m sorry, there is simply no way the White House felt pressure from a video posted at a news website, not covered on air.
Posted by: MayBee | July 21, 2010, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
tpj612, while I have enjoyed some of Spencer Ackerman’s writing, especially on foreign policy, national security and war-related topics– oh, and movies– I was hugely disappointed to read what he posted on Journolist pertaining to what appears to be bad faith charges of racism, etc– the post you reference. I don’t defend it, and I don’t think its okay. I haven’t seen any evidence that the tactic was in fact employed. Do you have any specific references in that regard?
I also am not privvy to the list’s posts
to get full context, so I find the case you’re trying to make rather incomplete and based largely on information from sources I find lie often and much.
I’m not familiar with what you’re talking about pertaining to Rush Limbaugh. I’m not a fan, avoid news of him as I don’t have the tolerance to listen to his show and fact check. So, I don’t know. My assumption was that many football players couldn’t stand him or bear the thought of playing for him because he’s so overbearing and an addict. I was projecting there as I’d hate to work for him. Addicts and alcoholics are very difficult and their rants tend to be, well, rants; and he’s rather infamous for rants of a bizarre nature. I grew up in a dysfunctional environment and I just wouldn’t want to work for an organization run by an addict or alcholic so I’d voice that.
I mean would you want to be associated with Rush Limbaugh if you had a choice?
I’m taking it you have a reasonably credible source for your charges, outside of Breitbart or Fox News.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
So let me get this straight, Breitbart smearing this woman was ok but she better not attack your favorite propaganda station without equal time?
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 21, 2010 7:01:54 PM
Indeed.
She has every right to speak out after being smeared.
I agree with her and I think you pointed out some terrific examples.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Dithering on this one to fire sombody might have been the smart thing to do for once.
Posted by: earl | July 21, 2010, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
“Yes, it was on their website, not on air.
I’m sorry, there is simply no way the White House felt pressure from a video posted at a news website, not covered on air.”
So who told you it was not on FoxNews, because someone started that talking point.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
So who told you it was not on FoxNews, because someone started that talking point.
=======
I don’t consider something being on a news website being on the News.
Just as I wouldn’t say something posted as an item here was on ABC News.
The video was played on MSNBC, however.
The reason Fox has gotten singled out here is Mrs. Sherrod said the White House was afraid the video would be on Glenn Beck (on Fox News). Not that it had been seen there.
Posted by: MayBee | July 21, 2010, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Ryan C , pertaining to Journolist: And now we have the pivot from the smear of Shirley Sherrod to the Tucker Carlson high school hissy fit because he was not allowed to join in.
Ryan C , pertaining to Rush Limbaugh:
You mean like this?
“”NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons”"
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
“The reason Fox has gotten singled out here is Mrs. Sherrod said the White House was afraid the video would be on Glenn Beck (on Fox News”
Yeah because FoxNews would never run with doctored video tapes and blow up a story with racial connotations
See the problem I have with the Obama administration is that they actually took the right wing media at face value.
I expect that kind of stupidity from FoxNews’s intended audience not the White House.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
“found quite a list of “interesting” quotes to accompany it on NewsOne, but I didn’t fact check.”
I’m not sure the NewsOne is completely sourced.
Media Matters has audio clips.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
“And FoxNews’s ceaseless coverage of the New Black Panther Party and Jeremiah Wright to say nothing of their part in the smear of Sherrod seems to support that to say nothing of their racist opinion show hosts.”
Hmmm…could it be that maybe, just maybe, what seems to be “ceaseless” coverage the NBP Party and Rev. Wright may be precisely because all the other “news” outlets are ignoring to cover up for The One? (I feel pretty confident that if a couple of Klansmen or white supremacists were hanging out in front of voting booth the state-controlled media – and you – would be speaking non-stop about it…).
“So let me get this straight, Breitbart smearing this woman was ok but she better not attack your favorite propaganda station without equal time?”
Hmmm…I suppose the incessant attacks, smears, and demonization of private citizens such as “Joe the Plumber” and Rick Santelli by YOUR favorite propaganda station(s) were A-OK with you?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
See the problem I have with the Obama administration is that they actually took the right wing media at face value.
I expect that kind of stupidity from FoxNews’s intended audience not the White House.
=========
I think it is foolish for any one to take any media report at face value- and especially foolish to act upon it without further investigation.
Similarly, I find it foolish to take what any politician has to say at face value.
Posted by: MayBee | July 21, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
“I don’t consider something being on a news website being on the News.
Just as I wouldn’t say something posted as an item here was on ABC News.”
Well that’s foolish since a great deal of people now get their news via the internet.
When you hear a big story break, do you wait for the anchors to come back from commercial or do you hop on line?
Its not a mutually exclusive thing.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
When you hear a big story break, do you wait for the anchors to come back from commercial or do you hop on line?
====
If I saw a story only on the internet, I would describe it as being on the internet (or ABCNEWS.com or what have you).
Regardless, as I said, another cable channel actually did show the video, Fox did not, but it was fear of them showing it later in the day that supposedly got Mrs Sherrod fired.
Posted by: MayBee | July 21, 2010, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
“Hmmm…could it be that maybe, just maybe, what seems to be “ceaseless” coverage the NBP Party and Rev. Wright may be precisely because all the other “news” outlets are ignoring to cover up for The One?”
Is that why they cut away from the healthcare debate between Obama and the GOP when Obama was handing the GOP their hat?
“Hmmm…I suppose the incessant attacks, smears, and demonization of private citizens such as “Joe the Plumber”"
ROFLMAO!
Sam the Plumber’s helper, whose boss’s business didn’t make $250K, who doesn’t pay his taxes and hates socialism except when he’s on the dole.
But here I have to credit FoxNew’s Shep Smith who took down Sam for lying about Obama and Israel.
Of course poor Shep was attacked by right wingers for not promoting the lie but he still deserves credit.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
I think it is foolish for any one to take any media report at face value- and especially foolish to act upon it without further investigation.
Similarly, I find it foolish to take what any politician has to say at face value.
Posted by: MayBee | Jul 21, 2010 7:24:42 PM
I agree with that.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
“I don’t defend it, and I don’t think its okay.”
Kudos to you (sincerely). Perhaps there is some degree of credibility amongst Leftists.
“I haven’t seen any evidence that the tactic was in fact employed. Do you have any specific references in that regard?”
Which tactic? That those who disagreed with or opposed Obama were to be called out as “racists”? There are more than a few examples (in fact they persist today – see media references to the “Tea Party” as “racists”).
“I mean would you want to be associated with Rush Limbaugh if you had a choice?”
Why not? Anyone who can stir up (and frighten) The Left as well as he does is doing something right!
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Media Matters has audio clips.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 21, 2010 7:22:16 PM
Thanks, found them. So, was the commenter fabricating the whole thing about Rush being falsely maligned by scary libruls?
They never give up.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“(I feel pretty confident that if a couple of Klansmen or white supremacists were hanging out in front of voting booth the state-controlled media – and you – would be speaking non-stop about it…)”
ROFLMAO!
I love how right wingers dutifully call any non right wing media state run media.
This is exactly how most cults work.
Right wingers are furious at their fellow right winger who is on the civil rights commission and who recently exposed the investigation as trumped up politics aimed at hurting Obama.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“Anyone who can stir up (and frighten) The Left as well as he does is doing something right!”
I wouldn’t want that type of person to own a business I was affiliated with, specifically for that reason, particularly if much of the talent in that business was left-leaning. He’d chase away talent and fans and be a loudmouth rather than a professional, if the past is prelude. But some people like divisiveness, I guess. Sound like its your raison d’etre so we won’t find a meeting of the minds on Rush, I’m sure.
Anyway, nice distraction. I take it there is no non-radical source for your allegations pertaining to libruls lying to mess up Rush’s big chance?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
“”I am getting hate calls and e-mails at this point,” Sherrod said in an interview with the liberal blog Media Matters. “I got one call last night at my house at 12:30 a.m. that said, ‘you lost your job, good for you’ and ‘b——’ There are people out there who will believe that I am a racist person, even though the story is getting out there.”
“I got crank calls right away. Someone sent me an e-mail and link and said, ‘shame on you’ and other stuff. I was sitting in a meeting, and I was really upset,” she said. “I texted back that they were so wrong and that they need to know the message, and they got it wrong.”"
Gotta love the right wing….ignorant and threatening
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 21, 2010 6:47:28 PM
The context of the comment you referenced are as follows:
- During show 1/19/07, a caller asked Rush his opinion regarding comments LaDainian Tomlinson made about Bill Belichick after a Charger loss in New England (LT referred to Belichick as “classless”
- Rush pointed out that the Chargers had no one to blame but themselves given a personal foul penalty on the Chargers (a very dumb one – A Charger player head-butted a Patriot player) late in the 4th quarter; Patriots go on to score, Chargers lose play-off game (at home)
- Rush points out Marvin Harrison and LT (both black, in case you are unaware) are “the two most classy individuals playing in the National Football League today” and contrasts them with Terrell Owens and Joe Horn
- He then states “The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons” in reference to those NFL players who (a.) do dumb things that cost their teams wins (see Chargers-Patriots Jan. 2007), and (b.) do things on the field that distract from the game (such as TO pulling a Sharpie out of his sock to sign a football immediately upon scoring a TD and handing to a fan in the stands or Joe Horn pulling a cell phone out of goalpost padding after scoring a TD)
So, his comments – in context – were not racist at all (unless you consider “stupid” to be a race). But, since it is Rush Limbaugh, the Leftists are quick to run with it.
In light of all of the discussion regarding “context” and Shirley Sherrod, I believe this is what is referred to as a “teachable moment”, right?
(p.s., let me know if you don’t understand any of the football references and I’ll elaborate)
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
“- Rush points out Marvin Harrison and LT (both black, in case you are unaware) are “the two most classy individuals playing in the National Football League today” and contrasts them with Terrell Owens and Joe Horn”
So the guy who sulked on the bench while his team went onto win without him and the guy who shot someone are classier because they don’t do creative endzone celebration….ooookaaaaayy.
“- He then states “The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons” in reference to those NFL players who (a.) do dumb things that cost their teams wins (see Chargers-Patriots Jan. 2007), and (b.) do things on the field that distract from the game (such as TO pulling a Sharpie out of his sock to sign a football immediately upon scoring a TD and handing to a fan in the stands or Joe Horn pulling a cell phone out of goalpost padding after scoring a TD)”
So what do endzone celebrations have to do with street gangs?
That’s actually more racist with context.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
“Which tactic? That those who disagreed with or opposed Obama were to be called out as “racists”?”
Sorry, I took your assertions to mean you knew exactly what was posted and who was on the list could respond to the details by offering specific articles by those journalists. My understanding is that it remains unclear, even doubtful, that any of their collective kvetching ever drove an actual media narrative that didn’t exist prior to the posts. Doesn’t excuse the idea or the post– bad faith claims of racism are bad faith claims of racism and have nothing to do with pursuing the truth.
I long for better journalism.
But so far the Journolist story pales in comparison to Breitbart’s doctored tapes or Fox News false media narratives. Journolist has been ended, and I’m glad about that, but the right wing sleaze continues to be fully backed right wingers. Do you denounce Breitbart for his doctored tapes?Or are you one of those cheering him on?
Do you question most media, or only if you perceive the media as liberal?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
It’s the “frenzied culture” and “advancements in technology” that are to blame for the misunderstanding with the fine Shirley Sherrod?
Posted by: jane | July 21, 2010, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
@ Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | Jul 21, 2010 8:05:24 PM
“But some people like divisiveness, I guess.”
Same could be said of Obama supporters (can you name a politician – or anyone – who has been more divisive than our supposedly “post-racist”, “post-partisan” president? )
“Anyway, nice distraction. I take it there is no non-radical source for your allegations pertaining to libruls lying to mess up Rush’s big chance?”
#1) Remarks by MSNBC’s David Shuster on 10/16/09:
DAVID SHUSTER: And Tamron, speaking of influence, we do have an update involving talk show host Rush Limbaugh and the controversy over his effort to help buy an NFL football team. Limbaugh DENIES he said quote, ‘slavery has its merits,’ IT WAS A QUOTE THAT APPEARD ON MSNBC this past Monday and Tuesday. MSNBC attributed that quote to a football player who was opposed to Limbaugh’s NFL bid. However, WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO VERIFY THAT QUOTE independently. So, just to clarify.
#2.) Politico reports following from CNN’s Rick Sanchez on 10/16/09:
“Earlier this week we provided quotes attributed to Limbaugh to illustrate why some people and players felt that Rush Limbaugh was too divisive to be an NFL owner. One of these quotes, which was in a column in the St. Louis Post Dispatch and in a book largely about conservatives, was refuted by Limbaugh. We have been unable to independently confirm that quote. We should not have reported it and for that, I apologize. I feel it is important to hold folks accountable when they make mistakes, and that should include myself and my team.”
——————–
So, there you have a couple of examples of “libruls lying to mess up Rush’s big chance”. In fairness, I did use “radical sources” (MSNBC and CNN) as sources, I hope this does not detract from overall point (/sarc.).
Next…
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
“- He then states “The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons” in reference to those NFL players who (a.) do dumb things that cost their teams wins (see Chargers-Patriots Jan. 2007), and (b.) do things on the field that distract from the game (such as TO pulling a Sharpie out of his sock to sign a football immediately upon scoring a TD and handing to a fan in the stands or Joe Horn pulling a cell phone out of goalpost padding after scoring a TD)”
Why is he talking about 5 year old end zone celebrations that had already been banned?
“(p.s., let me know if you don’t understand any of the football references and I’ll elaborate)”
Sure you can explain why you’re conflating a personal foul committed by a Chargers player against the Jets during a missed FG which cost them the game when the play had to be done over versus the Patriots imitating Merriman’s Light Out dance in San Diego on the Chargers mid field logo?
Bellichick is such a classy guy he’s actually snubs other coaches for post game handshakes when his team loses, ya know now that he can’t cheat anymore.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 21, 2010, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
“the guy who shot someone are classier because they don’t do creative endzone celebration….ooookaaaaayy.”
(a.) Harrison was not charged with shooting anyone
(b.) Rush was referring to the “class” of Harrison and Tomlinson showed on the field throughout their careers (if you followed football you would know LT’s incident with Belichick was not the norm for him, which is why – to a large extent – it received so much attention)
“So what do endzone celebrations have to do with street gangs? That’s actually more racist with context.”
Only because it (racism) is what you want to see…
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
“Why is he talking about 5 year old end zone celebrations that had already been banned?”
Easy – He was referring to what he perceived to be the “classlessness” of the individuals involved. Do I need to explain everything?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Who would have thought that we would all be paying this much attention to the dept of AGRICULTURE??…say, what’s the status of Ms Kagan’s nomination? where’s all the oil in the Gulf, (did it evaporate?)What was in that big old purple box containing more rules for American business that Obama signed today? (Did they just borrow the big purple box used for the healthcare bill, or is there are factory churning out big purple boxes for congress now?) Did those smiling politicians read this bill? What is the unemployment rate again? How much money did we just give Pakistan? How many soldiers died in Afghanistan this month? How many jobs have been created with stimulus? Why am I seeing all these new bank charges and fees? Never mind..back to the one burning issue that trumps all others.. racism.
Posted by: cindy | July 21, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Fox news and their minions in the faux spin zone.
Ms. Sherrod sue fox news and breitbart for defamation of character.
Fox News is Not News but a Spin Zone….remember the fake pimp that wasn’t a pimp that lied on two employees and was arrested for breaking into a congressman office.
Faux News Lies……..
Posted by: wideawake | July 21, 2010, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
The witch hunt is on edited vidoes and lie…Fixed News who is next?
Okeefe the fake pimp is being sued by another ousted acorn employee for lying that he was going to sell young girls in the state When the truth is he called the police.
Thank you Fixed News and Breitbart for lying…..
Posted by: wideawake | July 21, 2010, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
“But so far the Journolist story pales in comparison to Breitbart’s doctored tapes or Fox News false media narratives.”
You can’t be serious…Here we have (in Journolist) a group of “journalists”, pundits, and media-types who are sympathetic (I’m being kind) to Democrats, and in particular to Obama. They illustrate in the limited number of entries that have been exposed (I have a feeling there will be more to come) a bias against Republicans/conservatives. Is this responsible journalism? Can any of the “journalists” exposed have any credibility as non-biased reporters of news?
“Journolist has been ended, and I’m glad about that, but the right wing sleaze continues to be fully backed right wingers. Do you denounce Breitbart for his doctored tapes?”
How do you know they were “doctored”? Breitbart claims the tape was “received as he reported” (i.e., “doctored”). I don’t know if true or not – These comments were made at an NAACP event, yet the NAACP were quick to denounce Sherrod. Can you explain?
“Or are you one of those cheering him on?”
Do you approve of the attendees at the NAACP event who were “cheering on” Sherrod when she said that decided not to help the “white farmer” instead referring him to “his own kind”?
“Do you question most media, or only if you perceive the media as liberal?”
I question ALL media. And ALL politicians.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 21, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
If she was a white male, she would have been excoriated and forgotten. But since she is one of the President’s bigots in “good standing”, she gets to keep her job and gets an apology and is excused. This country deserves to rot from within!
Posted by: CBA | July 21, 2010, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
What kind of patronizing is it to offer this wrongfully-dismissed employee a BETTER position as partial compensation?
Of course, she’ll be laughingly patronized on her way to the bank.
It turns out, for anybody who cares to watch the entire video or her comments to Media Matters today that she is a stereotyping bigot but that’s no surprise for this administration.
The big news is that they were hoist on their own petard. They’re not scared of you, Jake, but they’re sure as hell scared of Fox.
Posted by: Bob | July 21, 2010, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
This good woman has been wronged and if making it right is “patronizing” your morals and brains are out of “whack”, but watching the political Race Baiting Fox News on a daily basis will make you a “retard”. George Wallace politics all over again! To a Tea!
Posted by: sara | July 21, 2010, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Posted by: tjp612 | Jul 21, 2010 9:01:59 PM
Since you just ask questions and don’t answer any, I’ll do the same.
Do you or do you not have specifics in regards to whether those people on Journolist– some of whom are liberal bloggers, not reporters and advertise themselves as such– used their collective kvetching to drive a particular media narrative, and if so can you provide the references for googling purposes, specifically in regards to bad faith claims of racism? When you allegedly question all media, including those that pander to cons, do you keep it all generalized, or do you look for specifics? Do you know who exactly was on Journolist?
Do you understand that I already condemned bad faith charges of racism and what Spencer Ackerman posted? Do you claim you have access to more context and special knowledge regarding what is in the posts, or are you making predictions based on your prejudices against the left, which you made clear in a prior post?
Do you have any nonradical and credible back up on your claims regarding Rush Limbaugh’s alleged maligning by scary libruls?
Are you or are you not cheering on Breitbart and his witch hunts and doctored tapes (see ACORN and the doctored tapes; doctored by editing in a pimp outfit) or his fake hysteria (see two youngish looking “black panthers” standing outside a polling booth, looking rather bored and not at all intimidating who leave without any fuss when the police aske them to leave). Do you fact check Breitbart?
What do YOU want to say about the NCAAP? Do you have the guts to just say it, rather than ask questions that are framed in a specific manner or do you hide behind your questions?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Sherrod was a folk hero long before this imbroglio, which has only added to her stature.
Everyone should read Willie Nelson’s column about this wonderful woman, and the difference she has made in people’s lives.
Posted by: Flash Override | July 21, 2010, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
This incident should further establish FOX’s reputation as a tabloid news organization.
Posted by: Skip | July 21, 2010, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
So, there you have a couple of examples of “libruls lying to mess up Rush’s big chance”. In fairness, I did use “radical sources” (MSNBC and CNN) as sources, I hope this does not detract from overall point (/sarc.).
Next…
Posted by: tjp612 | Jul 21, 2010 8:36:12 PM
I didn’t see this before. I’ll check it out– though you’re right, you’re quoting cable news, which isn’t my cup of tea. I also thought you were trying to say there was some big brouhaha akin to Breitbart’s and Fox New’s fabrication antics, rather than a couple of quickly corrected misstatements. But the bottom line is that I do not think they should have reported the quotes before they fact-checked, and I do think that sort of thing needs to be made public and condemned so they don’t think that’s okay.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Sherrod was a folk hero long before this imbroglio, which has only added to her stature.
Everyone should read Willie Nelson’s column about this wonderful woman, and the difference she has made in people’s lives.
Posted by: Flash Override | Jul 21, 2010 10:00:55 PM
Great piece, and good information to know as now that she’s voiced her opinion on Fox News the right has its talons and fangs out again. Thanks for the recommendation.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
And the media freak show rolls on without any self-reflection. Do you wonder, Jake, why the White House (any White House) believes they have to act so hastily in a situation such as this? Have you never seen the media freak show in full swing? If that white farm couple had not come forward so quickly to exonerate Ms. Sherrod, and the White House had waited a day or so to get the facts as the media now insists they should have, the airwaves would have been full of this clip 24/7 and we would have had a typical media frenzy of the type we’d seen many times before. The question the media would be hurling at the White House then would be “Why did you wait so long to act??”
Why is it so hard to get members of the media to ever say “mea culpa” and look in the mirror?
Posted by: Ron | July 21, 2010, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
This incident should further establish FOX’s reputation as a tabloid news organization.
Posted by: Skip | Jul 21, 2010 10:11:58 PM
And Breitbart’s ridiculous web site and pieces. But should is the operative word here.
Some people prefer tabloid news and will defend it because it validates their bent world view.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
But the bottom line is that I do not think they should have reported the quotes before they fact-checked, and I do think that sort of thing needs to be made public and condemned so they don’t think that’s okay.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | Jul 21, 2010 10:13:57 PM
Do you remember the President saying, “I don’t know all the facts, but I think the police acted stupidly.” Did you condemn him when he stated this, or did you give him a free pass as MSM did?
Posted by: wheresmymoney | July 21, 2010, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Bummer…the race-baiters in the White House and the NAACP got hoisted on their own little race-card petard. We know now that they and the state-run media will try to divert attention from this little fiasco by finding some conservative (I don’t know… just pick a name out of a hat, Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, anyone will do) and accuse them of being racists. Once we have everyone back to squabbling amongst each other, then all will be back to normal once again.
Posted by: gk | July 21, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Posted by: wheresmymoney | Jul 21, 2010 11:10:19 PM
I recall that after the police arrested a well-respected black professor who was in his own house, and who the president knows, the president said, “”I don’t know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played,but I think it’s fair to say, No. 1, any of us would be pretty angry; No. 2, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home; and, No. 3 … that there’s a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately.”
Since I’m a firefighter married to a cop, we had some lively discussions about both sides of the issue, but agreed it was odd the cop arrested somebody in his own home. Shouldn’t have happened.
But I also understand Crowley was in an odd position, given Gates feelings and words of upset.
I didn’t condemn anyone in that scenario. It was complicated. All the humans involved were and are human. Did the President choose the perfect words? Nope. Did anyone do the exact right thing? Nope. Is that part of life as a human? Yep.
Tell me, ,what does your misquote out of full context in regards to the President, Gates and Crowley have to with right wing news media fabrications and the erosion of journalism’s obligation to the truth? Do you or do you not condemn Breitbart’s fabrications and the other fabrications of smear merchants– or do you actually actively support them and spread their smears if they’re on “your side”? How many scalps will be enough? Are you glad Sherrod stood her ground? Are you distracting from the smear merchants and searching for a liberal scapegoat instead so you won’t have to confront the truth? Do you look for reasons to condemn the president and liberals or are you fair-minded? Is it okay, in your world, if a Republican or “conservative” does it, but not a liberal, Democrat, progressive, environmentalist or socialist?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 21, 2010, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
I will throw a bone and give one person on Fox News credit.
Fox’s Shep Smith: We didn’t run Breitbart’s edited video on my show because “we did not and do not trust the source”
Too bad so many on here can’t be as enlightened and forthright.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | July 22, 2010, 12:02 am 12:02 am
“I did not think before I acted,” Vilsack said.
——————
Silly wabbit, don’t you know you can’t trust anything you see on Fox?
Posted by: Skip | July 22, 2010, 12:02 am 12:02 am
I note on Palin’s recent ‘refudiate’ tweet, ABC followed Fox’s lead and used the staffer corrected version on WNT. So I just hope someone realizes that because they could be working for Fox one day – if they’re not doing it now, don’t act like it.
Posted by: kravitz | July 22, 2010, 3:02 am 3:02 am
How anyone could react and not stop to check anything Breitbart said is at best a mystery, at worst, a paranoid reactionary panic.
Posted by: YO | July 22, 2010, 3:07 am 3:07 am
accuse them of being racists.
Posted by: gk
If one says inane and foolish things like Breitbart, Tancredo, Mark Williams, etc… people should not be surprised when they and others have doubts and questions about their statements.
Posted by: YO | July 22, 2010, 3:16 am 3:16 am
Via Sarah Palin’s Facebook:
Earlier today, Mayor Bloomberg responded to my comments about the planned mosque at Ground Zero by suggesting that a decision not to allow the building of a mosque at that sacred place would somehow violate American principles of tolerance and openness.No one is disputing that America stands for – and should stand for – religious tolerance. It is a foundation of our republic. This is not an issue of religious tolerance but of common moral sense. To build a mosque at Ground Zero is a stab in the heart of the families of the innocent victims of those horrific attacks. Just days after 9/11, the spiritual leader of the organization that wants to build the mosque, Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, suggested that blame be placed on the innocents when he stated that the “United States’ policies were an accessory to the crime that happened” and that “in the most direct sense, Osama bin Laden is made in the USA.” Rauf refuses to recognize that Hamas is a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of our ally, Israel, and refuses to provide information about the sources of funding for the $100 million mosque. Rauf also plays a key role in a group behind the flotilla designed to provoke Israel in its justifiable blockade of Gaza. These are just a few of the points Americans are realizing as New York considers the proposed mosque just a stone’s throw away from 9/11’s sacred ground.I agree with the sister of one of the 9/11 victims (and a New York resident) who said: “This is a place which is 600 feet from where almost 3,000 people were torn to pieces by Islamic extremists. I think that it is incredibly insensitive and audacious really for them to build a mosque, not only on that site, but to do it specifically so that they could be in proximity to where that atrocity happened.” Many Americans, myself included, feel it would be an intolerable and tragic mistake to allow such a project sponsored by such an individual to go forward on such hallowed ground. This is nothing close to “religious intolerance,” it’s just common decency.- Sarah Palin
Posted by: susan | July 22, 2010, 3:44 am 3:44 am
I watch FOX NEWS everyday now … I never miss it after 2008 election. Idon’t trust HIM.
I am A long time dem supporter and CNN, ABC viewer.
Posted by: susan | July 22, 2010, 3:50 am 3:50 am
Do the SO CALLED journalists care/love our NATION, or DO THEY LOVE Obama ONLY?
Posted by: talk from sf | July 22, 2010, 3:54 am 3:54 am
I’m telling you, Tom and Shirley are all set for a beer summit.. toast their joint loose tongues with the leader of the free beer world.
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 22, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Vilsack was never very impressive during his career in Ohio, this is one of my many complaints about the administration, they get washed up fools to do important jobs.
Mea Bad.
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 22, 2010, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Skip: “Silly wabbit, don’t you know you can’t trust anything you see on Fox?”
Fox News DIDN’T AIR THE FOOTAGE before Vilsack fired Sherrod. And Glenn Beck even took Sherrod’s side after it happened! That must have really bewildered the Beck-hating liberals.
This just seems to be yet another case of the Obama administration acting stupidly. We see evidence of it every day.
Posted by: Mary | July 22, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
“I did not think before I acted,” Vilsack said
Doesn’t pass the smell test Tom.
There’s no way a man travels through life as you have and gets to hold a position such as yours without thinking through situations especially one of the magnitude of the Sherrod incident.
So I don’t believe you Mr. Vilsack.
Now the top dogs in the White House have shown many times in a year and a half that they act without thinking. The directive to fire Sherrod came from the White House.
Posted by: Noz | July 22, 2010, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I saw an interesting statement recently that I’d like to share.
Some people prefer broadcast network news and will defend it because it validates their bent world view.
So True.
Posted by: Noz | July 22, 2010, 9:32 am 9:32 am
While the rush to judgment was improper…..the question of impartiality should still be investigated.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | July 22, 2010, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Obama IS THE “Racism Play!! Stimulus ? Health reform? Jobs?Environment?Hmm, what are the talking points for November? Well, if poll #’s were higher, you know our pals in Journolist would run with the magnanimity and historical fluff. Where are those Greek columns? But,But, But we need to change the subject and darn, race and class are so tried and true. Call the groups, NAACP, Congressional Black Caucus, & OUR team with” tingles up their legs”, it’s back to the bottom of the deck. Truth is so yesterday, especially when the lie detector is broken. The “watchdogs” are really our mascots, don’t ya know. Blame Fox and talk radio, after all everyone else is on vacation and only G-d knows everything.Isn’t that right, Bob Shieffer? The NAACP really ran with the ball. After all we can’t have racists resonating with African Americans and women? We take care of those folks, what’s wrong with a little dependency and group identity politics in exchange for votes and power retention? Inner city moms really don’t care about school choice, after all we’ll put them to work in government where no one gets fired.When do you suppose the Black Caucus will meet with Breitbart to collect the $100,000.00 reward that any of the hundreds of video cameras at the Health Care Bill signing must have captured anyone yelling racial epithets, the N word anything.Hey, CBC forget about all those video cameras that exposed no “N” word or epithets were yelled,find a Tawana Brawley already. Anyway, the suits at the networks have our backs. Let’s show the Tea folks how the race card is really played. Where’s my golf bag?
Posted by: pauldia | July 22, 2010, 10:36 am 10:36 am
This is one lady that knows how to PLAY THE SYSTEM…..It’s great that she has had an sudden change of heart (rriigghhtt); HOWEVER, she also used her position of POWER in a discriminatory fashion in the past and continues to inject “color” into the equation, recent example “I would love to talk to Obama about race.”..UH…..No, I do not trust her word nor do I trust any word coming out of the White House employees…..No it would NOT be my privilege to talk to her nor any racist of any ilk…..PAST OR PRESENT..
Posted by: Parallex View | July 22, 2010, 10:41 am 10:41 am
PS….THE ONLY “TEACHING MOMENT” VILSACK NEEDS TO LEARN IS HOW TO FILL OUT HIS UNEMPLOYMENT PAPERS AND STAND IN LINE WITH THE REST OF THE UNFORTUNATE UNEMPLOYED…HE NEEDS TO BE FIRED FOR NOT INVESTIGATING ALL THE CURRENT FACTS FIRST…
Posted by: Parallex View | July 22, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am
This is just great, first she sues the USDA for Millions then she gets a job with the agency, will she sue again?????Don’t we live in a great country. Now that Vilsack took the blame, what will be next.
Posted by: Lizzie | July 22, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am
The news media needs news badly without spending a lot of money to collect news abroad. Last week it was the Mel Gibson tape, this week it is the Shirley Sherrod tape. Both sounds awkward , but they appear to be ‘newsworthy’ and worthy discussion by news panels. I am looking forward to hear next tape of this kind soon.
Posted by: austin | July 22, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Might not see Obama having a big photo-op Rose Garden summit with Shirley.
Does he really want to keep her in the news after she shook down the USDA for billions then got a nice job with them?
Did the White House know who they were jerking around? Shirley knows how to play the government.
But if Shirley demands a photo-op with Obama she might get it.
Posted by: mick | July 22, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Where are the ones who caused most of this ruckus? Fox News bashed that woman from early morning. Each person from hour to hours kept saying Fox News Alert…we have just received a story about someone working in the white house who is a racist.” All day Tues. after Briehardt did a number on her. Where are their apologies. Wed. all they did was bash the white house for acting without checking….isn’t that exactly what they did? They did not check the story before they ruined her reputation and still no apologies from them. As usual..they will continue to blame Obama as that is all that station does. They live to do this. They are vicious and liars and this story proves it. The white house acted too quickly but they are the ones who put it out there in the beginning. Each one of their reporters and O’Reilly and Hannity should publically apologize. They are as guilty as that racist who accused her of being one.
Posted by: talmag | July 22, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Do the lapdog liberal media think they are helping their man-god by keeping Shirley Sherrod in the news?
How can it help to keep hearing that the WH told her to “pull over and resign”?
Just reinforces Obama’s Chicago style thuggery.
No due process.
Just take down whomever hurts his presidency–ask questions later.
Posted by: kyle | July 22, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Talk about thugs….the Fox Newsless station are the thugs here. They publically accused this woman all day long and now they don’t even feel they owe her an apology. And they wonder why ligitimate news stations don’t consider them one. They fit in between Inside Extra, Entertainment tonight.
Posted by: talmag | July 22, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Has Shirley heard that Jim Messina was giving high fives in the WH congratulating the staff for getting rid of a scandal before it took off?
Amateur hour continues in the WH.
God help our country.
Posted by: hank | July 22, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I love teaching moments. Here’s what our friends on the left are telling us.
If you used to be a racist but you have repented then you can not be held accountable for your past racism. Call it the Sherrod Test. Or the Byrd Rule. Or even the Trent Tenet.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | July 22, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
FOX news should be congratulated for being the only one in the media that is looking out for all Americans unlike the MSM who is only looking out for Obama.
Posted by: mick | July 22, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Why would Shirley accept a job with the government when she can sue them again and make millions?
Or she could just sit home and collect unemployment for the next four years.
Obama’s new entitlement program.
The WH fired Shirley based on a snippet of a video shown ON A BLOG!!!
Why oh why would she even WANT to work for a gov’t that incompetent?
Posted by: hank | July 22, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Obama and the NAACP have been so quiet about this. Total silence.
I think they’re scared.
Or maybe just totally embarrassed.
Tried to accuse the Tea Party of being racist and it blew up in their face.
I love it!
I feel sorry for Shirley but she got to tell her life story–which is an good one. And she’ll get a good job.
Plus I hope she found out that Obama isn’t so great afterall.
Posted by: ollie | July 22, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Ms.Sherrod has figured one thing out about Obama…
He doesn’t relate to the “small people”.
Obama’s spent most of his life in upper middle-class and now a multi-millionaire.
He and Michelle seem to fit in perfectly with the Ivy League elites on Capitol Hill.
For all of his attempts to act folksy most see it as just that–an act.
Posted by: molly | July 22, 2010, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
talmag, Fox didn’t even report on this until after Obama fired her.
Posted by: Nephron | July 22, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
“Talk about thugs….the Fox Newsless station are the thugs here.”
talmag, you need to improve upon your information gathering. Blaming fox news for this mess only shows your ignorance.
Posted by: J.R. | July 22, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
“talmag, Fox didn’t even report on this until after Obama fired her.”
Nephron…wrong again
FoxNews:”The Agriculture Department announced Monday, shortly after FoxNews.com published its initial report on the video, that Sherrod had resigned.”
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Shirley knows she has no case against FOX. They did not touch her story until after she was humiliated by the NAACP, harrassed and fired by the White House.
Even the initial release by Breitbart had the part about Shirley’s realization that it was not about black/white but the poor.
The NAACP and WH were only concerned about saving themselves and overreacted.
Posted by: phelps | July 22, 2010, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I’m sure the Obama Adminstration liked Shirley’s suggestion in the video that minorities should work for the government because no one gets fired.
With Obama’s massive expansion of gov’t is it any wonder that the job market in is booming?
Posted by: kyle | July 22, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Is anyone shocked that right wingers blame the WH and NAACP instead of the right wing media which smeared this woman?
Its the same mentality of people who think rape victims brought it upon themselves maybe even deserved it.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
The WH and NAACP have admitted that they screwed up. They joined the lynch mob and are guilty of the hanging. Recognizint that they have a problem is the first step to recovery. Now they must think before they talk and try to walk in the persons shoes!
Posted by: tillyerkt | July 22, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
What happened to No Drama Obama?
Almost everyday there’s a new drama that get’s POTUS off track. Most of it caused by him!
The cheerleaders in the media tried so hard to paint Obama as postracial, wise, cool, level-headed. But reality keeps getting in the way.
And everyday Obama’s mask slips alittle more.
Get the popcorn!
Posted by: millie | July 22, 2010, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
“Its the same mentality of people who think rape victims brought it upon themselves maybe even deserved it. ”
You’re all class Ryan. So you’re saying it was FoxNews all along because moments after they posted a story she was fired? And the White House is blameless in all this?
Posted by: J.R. | July 22, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
So Ryan, why did Obama fire her?
Posted by: Nephron | July 22, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Ryan,if this is all the fault of Fox News and right-wing bloggers,WHY DID OBAMA FIRE HER?If he doesn’t like Fox News,why did he base his decision on their reporting?(He certainly didn’t on the commentary-Hannity and O’Reilly aired after the firing.)
Posted by: Nephron | July 22, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Got to give FOX credit.
They were warned on Monday to be careful with the story and get all the facts. Beck didn’t touch it.
No one on Fox touched it until after she was fired.
The WH/NAACP were not that smart.
Posted by: ollie | July 22, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
“No one on Fox touched it until after she was fired.”
Is this the new lie?
“The Agriculture Department announced Monday, shortly after FoxNews.com published its initial report on the video, that Sherrod had resigned.”
Let’s see the right wing smears a decent woman then instead of apologizing (as some right wingers had the decency to do) quite a few right wingers pretend it did not happen.
The party of personal responsibility?
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
To Ollie: That is the biggest lie of all. I watched them all day say they had an exclusive and each and every hours someone new spoke about it up until Hannity who had a ball saying the Obama administration has someone working for them who practices racism. Those are the real facts…I know…I watched. Not one apology from this station or anyone on it. O”Reilly went on to say…we cannot have this stuff going on in our country.” She should be fired…
Posted by: talmag | July 22, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“Ryan,if this is all the fault of Fox News and right-wing bloggers,”
They started the smear so yes they bear the lion share of blame..
“,WHY DID OBAMA FIRE HER?If he doesn’t like Fox News,why did he base his decision on their reporting”
It looks like Vilsack did so but hey its not like you are a stickler for the facts.
But thanks for acknowledging that the reporting on Fox has little relation to the truth and should not be trusted.
I wish Obama had stuck to his previous strategy of ignoring the right wing media lies.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“You’re all class Ryan.”
Thanks
“So you’re saying it was FoxNews all along because moments after they posted a story she was fired?”
So when confronted with evidence of your lie, you make up a new one.
Its the right wing way, I guess.
“And the White House is blameless in all this?”
The White House has actually stepped up and sought to correct their mistake.
Andrew Breitbart accuses the white farmers that said Sherrod had saved their farm were plants.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
“Is this the new lie? ”
Howard Kurtz (washington post)seems to disagree:
“But for all the chatter — some of it from Sherrod herself — that she was done in by Fox News, the network didn’t touch the story until her forced resignation was made public Monday evening, with the exception of brief comments by O’Reilly”
Posted by: J.R. | July 22, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
CAlling people plants is what some of the tea party are now saying about the people in their group carrying negative signs with racism and hate. This was told to me personally by a tea party friend. He said…those people carrying signs like that are plants by the democrats and others trying to make us look bad. Did he think I was stupid enough to buy this line? It is so funny that when they or the republicans want to say things …they all use the same words. Michael Steele may not be perfect but he did say that there are pages of rhetoric distributed to those so they know what to say and for once I agree with him. They all use the same phrases…can’t even come up with their own words. I wonder how much they pay these PR people out of the donations to come up with these phrases?
Posted by: talmag | July 22, 2010, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
I do think the white house reacted too quickly but each one has personally apologized….how about Fox who called her a racist? Not one person has apologized and they are acting like they had nothing to do with it. As I said before..that is why they will never be taken seriously as a news station…they fit in between Entertainment tonight and Inside Edition. No class…all fluff.
Posted by: talmag | July 22, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
talmag: “I do think the white house reacted too quickly but each one has personally apologized….how about Fox who called her a racist?”
Produce the Fox quote where Sherrod was called a racist. BTW, Sherrod is a SELF-ADMITTED racist.
Posted by: Mary | July 22, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
“Howard Kurtz (washington post)seems to disagree:
“But for all the chatter — some of it from Sherrod herself — that she was done in by Fox News, the network didn’t touch the story until her forced resignation was made public Monday evening, with the exception of brief comments by O’Reilly”"
Howard Kurtz also believes that FoxNews keeps their news and opinion shows separate…..which is laugh out loud funny.
I guess FoxNews was lying about FoxNews when they claimed to have broken the story shortly before she was fired.
“The Agriculture Department announced Monday, shortly after FoxNews.com published its initial report on the video, that Sherrod had resigned.”
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
“Produce the Fox quote where Sherrod was called a racist”
Media Matters has a great run down with video, a couple of examples
“On the July 19 edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Steve Doocy said that Sherrod made “a speech to the NAACP that sure sounded racist.” Later, after guest-host Ailysn Camerota asserted that Sherrod’s remarks are “outrageous and perhaps everybody needs a refresher course on what racism looks like,” Doocy responded that Sherrod’s comments are “Exhibit A”
“On the July 19 edition of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity asserted that Sherrod’s comments were “[j]ust the latest in a series of racial incidents,”
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
The loyal followers have been told to avoid Fox .. why do the leaders react to it.
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 22, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
White House to Tom Vilsak Mea Scalpa.
Posted by: Dontget818 | July 22, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Fox News commented on information that was provided…Just as Valsack and Obama did, jump to conclusions. Fox News jumped to conclusions NO DOUBT; however, the difference is that Obama….wait for it…. IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ACCORDING TO LIBERALS WHO PRESENT OBAMA AS SOME KIND OF GENIUS, THIS ONLY DEMONSTRATES THAT OBAMA IS ON THE SAME LEVEL WITH HANNITY OR O’RIELLY….
Posted by: Parallex View | July 22, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
“Fox News commented on information that was provided”
Provided by whom? Foxnews? This whole implication that Foxnews.com isn’t Fox is absolutely ridiculous. We’re not buying this good Fox/bad Fox baloney. And it wasn’t just information….it was intentionally edited to mislead. It’s like those silly Palin interviews where O’Reilly lobs her softballs and then winces while she verbosely swats at them. The big loudmouths like O’Reilly can’t risk looking so far to the fringe so they turn the dogs loose.
Posted by: Skip | July 22, 2010, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
“Fox News commented on information that was provided”
Exactly.
Who actually thinks FoxNews is a new organization that practices journalism, they’re just a propaganda outfit for the right wing who broadcasts what they are told.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 22, 2010, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
The Shirley Sherrod issue is just more garbage to distract everyone from what is important. Why wasn’t she placed on leave until they had time to check the story? OOPS — it’s kinda like when they passed HCR without reading it! How many “backroom deals” did Obama make to quieten Shirley Sherrod? Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the other liberals in Congress will do or say anything to stay in power. This is the most corrupt administration in American history. Our Dictator-In-Chief has no problem governing against the will of the American people. Now, he’s planning ANOTHER vacation at our expense!
Posted by: AMERICAN CITIZEN | July 23, 2010, 12:28 am 12:28 am
“Who actually believes Obama practices professionalism?”
Exactly…..
Posted by: Parallex View | July 23, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am