By Kate McCarthy

Aug 16, 2010 6:02am

George’s Must-Reads: Should Obama Have Stayed Out of the Ground Zero Mosque Controversy?

Should the president have stayed out of the Ground Zero mosque controversy? The Wall Street Journal says yes. Would there be more at stake if the president opposed the mosque? Michael Gerson says yes. Will this become an issue for the November elections? Republicans say yes.

Gen. Petraeus’ full-court press.

China passes Japan’s economy. The U.S. expected to be next.

A burglar has broken into more than 50 Lake Tahoe homes. This burglar is, Bubba, a 700-pound black bear.

I want to read this novel.

George Stephanopoulos

follow me c Georges Must Reads: Should Obama Have Stayed Out of the Ground Zero Mosque Controversy?

User Comments

I agree with them, glad the messiah/annoited one/god on earth (lol) & whatever u call him, persuaded himself to be involved! It means the ones who voted for him, if not by now, will really see his sociallist agenda become clearer & ur rights become less evident! In Nov those who were/are blind should do what’s right & correct the wrong done to the USA & our individual rights. Come on America….Just Do It !!!!!

Posted by: Keith Phlipot | August 16, 2010, 6:29 am 6:29 am

President’s job is to uphold the constitution. Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, hence, president cannot deny it.
As for people that are offended by a mosque on ground zero (which is by the way 2 blocks away from ground zero), then the lingering question is what is their next demand – all muslims out of NYC?

Posted by: constitution | August 16, 2010, 7:23 am 7:23 am

I have difficulty verbalizing how sick and tired I have become of this whole thing. So now we refer to the Constitution only when it benefits us? We have the right in this country to religious freedom. The mosque will not be on ground zero!!!! It will be two New York City blocks away!! You have got to be kidding me!. If the Muslims are not permitted to have the mosque there, my question then becomes where does it end!! Who is next…..Christians, Catholics, Jews, Prostestants…..??? Hasn’t this country had enough bigotry?? Contrary to popular belief, all Muslims are not terrorists, any more than all Catholic Priests are child molesters, all Southern Baptists are cut from the same mold as Jim Baker….STOP! JUST STOP THIS MADNESS!! President Obama could have weighed in on either side of this issue and there would still be an uproar. All the President has to do is simply open his mouth and the good ole boys are right there waiting to pounce. Have we conveniently forgotten the absolute mess that George W. Bush made of this country, while his fellow Republicans simply sat there. Have we forgotten that George W. is the cause of the mess we are in today? It took him 8 years to make this mess and President Obama is expected to straigten it all out in less time. My question is where were you all when the mess making was going down?? The total lack of respect for this President is appalling!!!!! I believe in my heart and soul that this blatant disrespect simply stems from the fact that he is black. This is 2010 and this covert racism saddens me.

Posted by: Gee A. Lee | August 16, 2010, 7:27 am 7:27 am

This is the plan, laugh now but watch and see:
1.Rewrite the Constitution and break down its firewalls through Judicial and Bureaucratic fiat.
2.Concentrate all meaningful power in the Federal Government.
3.Suppress and Repress the Individual by attacking his Unalienable Rights through laws and constant torment.
4.Eliminate Private Property through Confiscatory Taxation and Regulation and wage constant war against Business Enterprises and Entrepreneurs.
5.Control Institutions of Education at all levels and turn them into Indoctrination Centers for the State.
6.Change the Citizenry by opening National Borders to virtually all comers and changing the qualifications for Citizenship to include mostly poor, uneducated illegal aliens.
7.Destroy the Private Financial Institutions that have funded the Greatest Production and Accumulation of Wealth for the Most People the World has ever known.
8.Destroy Capitalism and replace it with Redistributive Policies by Destroying the currency and Replacing it with a new currency or Revaluing the old currency.
9.Eliminate American Sovereignty through arrangements and agreements with Foreign Countries and International Bureaucracies.
10.Use American Foreign Policy not to improve American Economic and National Security, but to advance the Notion of One Government Globalism.
Image used with permission by Getty Images

Posted by: Dave Lambert | August 16, 2010, 7:28 am 7:28 am

What is wrong with you people(Americans)? We all probably agree, that this is the best country in the world. Then act like it! What makes it the best, is our diversity, our right to different religions, our right to a trial, etc. If you think we should not permit a Mosque to be built, then you would agree with the following…Due to the Catholic church’s incident of the molestation of children, Catholic churches can no longer be built within 1 mile of schools. We didn’t even bring criminal charges against sexual child abuse. Obama is correct…Freedom to practice ANY religion is our right! Restricting that right is NOT ‘The American Way’

Posted by: Bob S. | August 16, 2010, 7:31 am 7:31 am

George, this is no more a “ground zero mosque” than the place you used to host This Week was a “White House Newseum”. The mosque is a nearly 3 minute walk from Ground Zero. To get there you pass strip joints, a yarn store and other businesses. It’s not even a mosque. It’s a community center with a prayer room. This is such a manufactured controversy, I wish you were more precise with your language.

Posted by: Chris | August 16, 2010, 7:32 am 7:32 am

Should the press stop making it a full time career to try to further GOP election year bogus talking points? Yes!

Posted by: secondlook | August 16, 2010, 7:54 am 7:54 am

I listened to the comments on your interview this morning and heard the debate on personal views about where this mosque should be built or if it should. This country was built on “In God We Trust”, yes people have the choice for religious rights but please quit using religious choices from the men who wrote the original basis for this country……..it is God they sought, it is God they trusted, it is God they turned too and it is God our “leaders” are leaving behind. I wish these men and women who make the decisions that effect our childrens future would realize it is God we need back in our country.

Posted by: Alan Johnston | August 16, 2010, 8:24 am 8:24 am

REPUBLICANS GOT NO OTHER ISSUES, SO THEY WILL HAVE TO GO WITH THIS ONE.

Posted by: Allen | August 16, 2010, 8:26 am 8:26 am

The Constitution guards against the “tyranny of the majority” and we should thank God or Allah for that.

Posted by: Allen | August 16, 2010, 8:27 am 8:27 am

After just reading some of the other comments I see why our country is the way it is today. Where are American morals??????? I’m sick to death of the race card being played!! Get over it!! The more I see and hear the more I believe that blacks are more raciest then the rest of the Americans. President Obama made it a national issue when he presented his opinion by the media – he wasn’t in private session and discussing it and the media got a hold of it – Obama did it before the media himself. Also, to continue to blame the state of our country on the previous presidents — give me a break – it’s been almost 2 years!!!! When is anyone going to take responsibility for their actions TODAY!! Back to the original subject – This country was founded on freedom of religion but we are also a country of compassion and unity. No one is saying they can’t build their building – they are just asking that it not be built 2 blocks from where thousands of our FELLOW AMERICANS were MURDERED by their fellow countrymen. Have some integrity people!! Think – why would Muslims want to build so close to that area anyways — to rub it in that they can? I believe that we are a joke to all other countries — we are so worried about stepping on peoples’ “constitutional rights”! what about the majorities’ rights???? Why does one out way the many?? Move the building!!!! Build out side the city! It’s a slap in the face to New Yorkers and to all AMERICANS!

Posted by: Danie | August 16, 2010, 8:28 am 8:28 am

This is America. Freedom of religion. If you are going ban the Muslim mosque, then you will have to ban all other religious groups. The Muslims did not destroy the twin towers, it was terrorists from Afganistan and of the taliban. We cannot be so ignorant as to hold a whole religious group responsible for what happened on 9/11. I think ground zero should be surrounded by places of prayer and peace, no matter what the religion it is. What a tribute that would be!!

Posted by: HappyHome28 | August 16, 2010, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Should Obama Have Stayed Out of the Ground Zero Mosque Controversy?
YES! …but now that he is in it, he must ride the wave or washout (however you view it.) This event should have just been a local matter. It was indeed being handled. Now, you have people just being backed into corners.
I doubt it will be a campaign issue though. Republicans have alienated Blacks (never really had them anyway), Latino, now Muslims…. Only people left are the Indians.. (Never mind)… Only people left are the Asians! No problem though… they still have time.

Posted by: mytakeonthis61 | August 16, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

It’s the idea of it. It is a slap in the face of Americans. There are very few Muslims in this area and they can build somewhere else. The President just showed again that he cares much more for the Muslims than he does for the American citizen.

Posted by: Jan Saunders | August 16, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am

The Republicans and right wingers amaze me. They would have us rewrite the Constitution to be self serving when they feel their sensibilities are being invaded. Here we have a President who reminds us just what the Constitution and the designers of that great document meant and intended for the wording of the first amendment to accomplish. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Now, they want the Government to step in and virtually trample all over the Constitution in order to satisfy their damaged sensibilities. I hail the courage of this President to step up to the plate beside James Madison and all other framers of the Constitution and the principles upon which it was written.

Posted by: Houstonblazerdad | August 16, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am

The location for this mosque WAS part of 9/11. The landing gear from one of the planes hit/fell into the building on this site. They were offered another location and turned it down. Why? Everyone KNOWS they have the right to put the mosque there. But the motive for it is in question. Is it a victory mosque? Emotions and feelings do matter and this is a very insensitive, disrespectful location for it. When will the regular American citizen ever be shown any respect?

Posted by: jane | August 16, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am

This is all nonsense. THe president takes an oath to uphold the Constitution and that’s what he’s doing. He made clear that there is no legitimate reason why a mosque should not be build a few blocks away from Ground Zero, regardless of the wisdomm of doing so. Muslims have been worshipping there for a long time; why is is such a big deal if they want to build a mosque there instead of continuing to worship in an existing building?
I also learned something last night I didn’t know: there is a mosue/place of Muslim worship in the Pentagon and no one has objected to that that I know of. What is the difference in these two situations?
Basically, this property in question is on private ladn and the government has no legal reason to keep it from being built; that IS the Constitution and there is no good or legal reason that I can see for not allwoing it to be built. The only legitimate concern here is that possibly one of the imams has made statements about 9/11 which angered a lot of people but that is not a good enough reason to deny the building. Only if there is eviodence that the place of worship is somehow involved in terrorist activity would there be any concerns which should eb addressed.

Posted by: EarlGrayHot | August 16, 2010, 9:17 am 9:17 am

I feel the President told it like it is “they have religion freedom its in our constution”. I think maybe if the survior’s family can look at what the plan is maybe that would help? Just because we do not understand their religion does not mean that it should not be built.Go after the nude clubs aka prosection halls before you go have the mosque. Where are our morals? I forgot we do not have any.
I think it is time to heal this wound instead of pouring fuel on the fire.

Posted by: jennifer | August 16, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am

this issue is not owned by republicans! you liberals are unreal–this is not a “republican” issue–over 60% of Americans do not approve of this mosque being built at this site!they are not all republicans…Obama should have stayed out of it–just like the “beer summit”…we need a leader , not an America -hater as President…

Posted by: sifto77 | August 16, 2010, 9:26 am 9:26 am

The President is required to defend the Constitution and laws of this land. The hate filled republicans and national media are once again blowing the Presidents comments way out of context. The media can no longer be trusted to tell truth or come close to the whole truth.

Posted by: john | August 16, 2010, 9:27 am 9:27 am

“….The President just showed again that he cares much more for the Muslims than he does for the American citizen.”
BINGO!!! Let’s call it what it is!!! O-kay to the poster above (who is only amplifying what many feel), Muslims cannot be American citizens????

Posted by: mytakeonthis61 | August 16, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am

No one denies the right to this mosque being built. Unfortunately, too often, people abuse the rights that have been given to them and ignore the “right” thing to do. Where is the millions of dollars to build this coming from? That question has yet to be answered. Why does it need to be two blocks from ground zero, the most horrific attack on American soil? People need to respect those rights that we so fortunately have been given and act responsibly in a way that doesn’t cause pain to people who have endured more than their share already? Why not build an activity center that is for all Americans, one that has no one religion attached to it, but instead welcomes all religions?

Posted by: Mary | August 16, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Using a bit of common sense reasoning I ask, if the mosque were truly a bridge for peace effort wouldn’t the plan be shifted when the location was perceived as “in our face”?
A bridge for peace effort would not be designed as a test of religious liberty.
“In your face” is not an attempt for reconciliation and would never achieve anything but conflict and controversy.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 16, 2010, 9:37 am 9:37 am

John, the President sure picks and chooses which laws to defend! How about the Federal law against illegal immigration?? Some of you need to research what the Muslims have done to England and other countries in Europe. Maybe it will open your eyes.

Posted by: jane | August 16, 2010, 9:41 am 9:41 am

This Minnesota citizen is not happy with Congressman Ellison’s comments with you this morning. It is obvious why most Americans are offended by the current issues regarding Ground Zero. Keith Ellison needs to tune in to the people he represents.

Posted by: Jean | August 16, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Constitutionally, this group has the right to build at this location. BUT, just because they have the right to build, doesn’t make it right to build. If they are really concerned with promoting understanding, they would also be concerned with the feelings of others and at least consider other options. I also think the President should stay out of this issue since for now it remains a local zoning issue.

Posted by: Pat | August 16, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am

When the “mainstream” Muslims in America start denouncing the terrorist acts of the “radical” Muslims, then, and only then, will any “bridges” be possible. For all you loony libs that are wrapping yourselves in this phoney “oh-so-tolerant-muslims-are-the-victims” blankets of BS, ask yourself this: Of whom are these muslims victims? The honest answer is that they are victims of the radical muslims, and they should try separating themselves from that group. Are you willing to accept Sharia as part of OUR laws? That’s what this cleric is asking for. Think it’s impossible? Just google “Muslim Man rapes wife, judge sees it as his right”. This happened where? New Jersey. Are you libs gonna defend spousal rape? And actually, this muslim couple was divorced, and she had a protection order against him. But the judge says under the muslim faith, she is still his wife, and she MUST SUBMIT TO HIM. Including allowing him to rape her as she cried. I don’t want that in anywhere, much less MY country. Maybe some of you whiney libs should look to the present to see what you may be putting into OUR future……Is you need to disagree with the right so strong that you will allow religous laws to supersede Constitutional laws and common sense??? You may disagree with me, but stories of muslim men OWNING their women abound………and you call yourselves ‘progressives’. Progressing right back to the days of slavery, only this time, it’s women who are the slaves……..and maybe that’s okay with you.

Posted by: ncpilot10 | August 16, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am

This mosque is being built for purely political purposes. The president should wise up.

Posted by: Jeff | August 16, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Obama has not yet learned to refrain from commenting on issues like this. It does no good whatsoever. Plus, I don’t think it’s appropriate. I put this controversy on the same footing as discussions over what should be located near concentration camps. Ground Zero is hallowed ground and should be honored as such.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 16, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am

This is a tough one. While I certainly understand the feelings of the families that lost loved ones on 9/11, I also understand what the President is trying to say. The people involved in this Islamic Center had nothing to do with the attacks on our country and we do have the right to religious freedom. HOWEVER, I think he made a HUGE mistake this close to an election by taking a stance – the majority of Americans do not agree with him and this is just the sort of thing that flares up the Racist Right. Big mistake that will cost the Dems.

Posted by: allie | August 16, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am

ncpilot10, you make a good point. And where is the liberal’s tolerance for a Christian’s manger scene at Christmas time?? Or even just a Christmas tree?

Posted by: jane | August 16, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am

What makes this country great is the one true God who blessed it; nothing of our hand has done this. Building a mosque to a false God does not help us or make us great – i would imagine it angers the one true God which will only hurt our country. You have seen the beginning of our fall because of our moral failures. How far do we have to fall before we repent?
Will those who claim that freedom of religion is paramount simply read the Koran before speaking? Freedom of speech is not universal – ever. For the same reason that you cannot yell fire in a crowded theatre without consequences, so you cannot tolerate calls for death and destruction.
How about a compromise? We will have people attend the mosque every day and if any leaders call for jihad, killing, or support for those who do, the mosque will be immediately razed without financial reparations. Any takers?

Posted by: G | August 16, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am

WELL, LEAVE “RELIGON” OUT OF “POLITICS” AND THE “GOVERMENT” AS WELL AS THE “WORK PLACE” AND THE “OFFICE”

Posted by: GARY WAYNE TILSON | August 16, 2010, 11:20 am 11:20 am

As I understand it this will not just be a mosque, but a very large and sigificant Islamic Center. We also know that unlike other religions, mosques have too often been used as places where hatred is preached and terrorists are recruited. Religious freedom is a fundamental right in America. But this is not a question of religious freedom -it’s a case of stupidity. This is a faux pas that will cost Obama and underscores his decision to try the 9/11 terrorists in NY civil courts. He is the president of the United States, not the head of the ACLU.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 16, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am

People who love or hate President Obama may or may not vote in the Congressional elections. Does anyone truly believe that–with all other major issues out there–voters are going to base their choice on a congressional race this November on what the President said back in August?

Posted by: john j. corbin | August 16, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I see the media is trying to make a big deal of absolutely nothing.
Day One:
As President of the U. S. Obama was unequivocally defending the Constiution. He took an oath to do that. He was not speaking as a private citizen. On Constitutional issues he must always defend the Constiution, regardless of his personal opinion.
Day Two:
He would not comment as to the “wisdom” of putting a mosque near gound zero because The Constiution is very explicit regarding the freedom of religion. For him to comment on the wisdom of it, would be inappropriate. He would then be giving his personal opinion.
How is doing your job correctly, backtracking?
But of course the Reichwing haven’t go a leg to stand on when it comes to the issues. First it is immigration and securing the borders, although nothing happens when the Reichwing is in office when it comes to border control.

Posted by: Rightwing is Clueless | August 16, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

@hughjanus…..you obviously do not understand Jane’s point. She was not talking about YOU or YOUR house, nor me nor MY house. She’s talking about the times (every Christmas season) that some liberal gets her feelings hurt by the fact that there is a Christmas Tree or other Symbol that has the dreaded “Christ-word” in it and complains to their local chapter of the ACLU. Then in the typical spirt of liberal tolerance (which means “do it our way, or no way”), the Christmas scene is removed. Liberal tolerance…now THERE’s an oxymoron for you. The liberals would totally ban Christmas if they could, and promote Halloween. Halloween is the perfect holiday for liberals….you get to go knock on the doors of people you don’t even know, and demand that they give you some kind of treat. Much like obama is doing with his agenda.

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 16, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

righwingisclueless, you don’t even have an idea of what’s really going on around you, do you? Much like the frog in the pot of slowly heating water. And then you have to audacity to post comments that SHOULD be hilarious…until we realize that, hey, you really believe what you are typing. Then you comments become sad. More proof that the liberals are mostly people who made bad decisions is high school…………

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 16, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Jane, The president is saying the consitution protects their right to build the mosque. He spoke staight forward and accurately. If you want the constitution to change to say only thiose religions blessed by the immoral majority can be built in NYC then start the amendment process and see how far you get.

Posted by: John | August 16, 2010, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

John, it’s like the politicians on BOTH sides of the aisle are saying: “No one disagrees on the Constitutionality of the building of the mosque. Obama’s statement on whether the issue is constitutional or not, by itself, appears at the very least to be silly. I.E., we, the citizens of the US did not need our president to tell us that it is Constitutional. We already know that. It’s like him standing up, looking down his nose at us little people and declaring that the sky is blue. The spin masters are doing an artful just in TRYING to divert the story into making it appear that the liberals and the conservatives have differing opionions on the Constitution. He screwed up. Period. It’s not just the conservatives that heard what obama stated the first time. HE ENDORSED THE BUILDING OF THE MOSQUE. That’s why the Democratic politicians are saying that “…Obama was wrong in this case…” and are distancing themselves from that first statement. His endorsement of the mosque backfired on him, and he and his minions are spinning like crazy to make it seem like we little people misunderstood him. But it’s lipstick on a pig, and it’s a bell that he cannot un-ring because the MSM is FINALLY starting to hesitate sweeping obamas’ gaffe’s under the rug. But the 24% of you “true believers” won’t see that obama can make errors no matter the evidence. You’ll just close your eyes and pretend all is well in Utopia.

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 16, 2010, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

…”In the meantime, some candidates aren’t waiting to express their hesitation with the president’s comments. DEMOCRAT Jeff Greene, for example, is vying for the Democratic nomination to run for the U.S. Senate seat from Florida. He has said that he disagrees with the president. (this guy is not conservative in the least). He said, “President Obama has this all wrong and I strongly oppose HIS SUPPORT (Emphasis on “his support”) for building a mosque near Ground Zero.” Greene continued, “Freedom of religion might provide the right to build the mosque in the shadow of Ground Zero, but common sense and respect for those who lost their lives and loved ones gives sensible reason to build the mosque someplace else. President Obama had the chance to show leadership by calling on the mosque’s supporters to find a more appropriate location.” These are the words from a DEMOCRATIC candidate. See? It’s not only the conservatives that have issues with obama’s statement……oh, of course you can’t see that. Why am I even trying?

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 16, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Just as well, we know how much support he gives the Islamists, NOW!

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 16, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Constitution
You are flat out wrong when you attribute the criticism of Oblamea to his skin color. He has proven to be inept and divisive because of his policies and his lack of leadership. It has nothing to do with race for most people.

Posted by: LB | August 16, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

This is a president who had no problem saying the Boston police acted stupidly and he can’t take a stand as a leader to support the citizen’s this is hurting? He has a celebration for Ramadan and nothing for the National Day of Prayer. He continues to show no leadership and no connection to the majority of the people in this country. It would be very easy for him to clearly state the obvious. They have the right to build the mosque, but it is not right to build it.

Posted by: LB | August 16, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

To Bob S: there is a mosque in the plans, not just a prayer room.
To Kieth: There are plenty of mosques in NYC and plenty of Muslims. There is even a mosque within a short distance of this that was there on 9/11. This one is a slap in the face with ties to an Iman that is clearly not moderate like this administration says. He is traveling on our money to raise funds for this project with the blessings of this administration. There will be plenty of Muslims, perhaps some of those that danced in the street on 9/11, who will see this as a symbol of their triumph.

Posted by: LB | August 16, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Not one time did Ellison make any kind of comment that implied responsibility on the Muslims. Everyone else needed to make concessions and have understanding. It amazes me that we have so many people like that in government. Why should they not have some consideration for others? Does he not realize that there will be Muslims somewhere who see this as a trophy?

Posted by: LB | August 16, 2010, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Of course he should have waded into the discussion and what he said was correct. They can build it if they want to. But he should have also said we know that the building of this Mosque is purely a slap in the face to not only to those who lost loved ones but to Americans in general.

Posted by: david | August 16, 2010, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Any mosque is a holy place. I’m an Episcopalian, but I respect that a church, synagogue or mosque is a place of worship, and it shouldn’t be a place of politics.
To blame all Muslims for the actions of less than 100, at least one of whom was once a business associate of former president Bush, is just playing the usual Republican “We Attack Everything that might unify people or bring forgiveness” politics.
There is also a strip joint and an off track betting the same distance from ground zero.
I hate to tell these people, but it’s 2010, and we don’t own the world anymore. It’s been bought by the Arabs and the Chinese with all the money we’ve shipped them buying gasoline and everything else.
Besides, forgiveness IS the “Christian” thing to do. These people claim that we’re a “Christian nation”, so they should start acting like it.

Posted by: Edward Garren | August 16, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Hmmmmmmmmm isn’t weird how Peter King, had to bring the Holocaust as an example…how convenient….It’s a shame, how the people against this mosque building, are taking it so far as to forget that the people they keep referring to are not only Muslims, but they are American Muslims, some from Arab decent and some from American roots. Whatever happened to the America that didn’t know what religion a person was, because everyone was treated and looked at equally, no matter what God they worshiped. Did you all forget that more than 5000 Muslims used to pray daily in the towers, and that many of them died in the attacks? Or were did they somehow survive in a miraculous way????!!!! Seriously people, live and let live. It seems that Islam became a nationality of some sort, and not a religion….So, if a CHURCH WAS TO BE BUILT IN OKLAHOMA IN THE SAME PLACE OR BLOCKS AWAY FROM WHERE TIMOTHY MCVEIGH BLEW UP THAT BUILDING, WOULD THIS CONTROVERSY BE TAKING PLACE???!!!! OR HOW ABOUT THAT PILOT THAT FLEW HIS PLANE INTO THE IRS BUILDING IN AUSTIN, TX BECAUSE HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH HIS TAXES???? WHEN A CHRISTIAN OR JEW PREFORM SUCH A HORRIFIC ACT, HE’S FOUND AS TEMPORARILY INSANE OR ANY OTHER EXCUSE IS MADE FOR HIM, BUT WHEN A MUSLIM WANTS TO BUILD A MOSQUE HE IS INSENSITIVE, RUDE AND UNCARING NOT TO MENTION A TERRORIST….I’M A MUSLIM AMERICAN AND I’M HURT BY THE PEOPLE OF THIS BEAUTIFUL COUNTRY WHOM ARE FIGHTING WITH ALL THEIR MIGHT TO DENY THE FREEDOM OF WORSHIP, THE FREEDOM OF EVERYTHING THAT WE ARE FIGHTING OTHER COUNTRIES AND PEOPLE FOR….HOW IRONIC…

Posted by: 75JamieTX | August 16, 2010, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

The President should feel free to comment on anything he or she chooses. It has been nine years and I would like to see people step-up, re-focus and get things done at Ground Zero. Perhaps we should ask, “Will the memorial work at Ground Zero be completed before the mosque is built?” I love NYC and all the people there….only been there once, and I hope to visit again…and I am certain there will always be controversy.

Posted by: midwestintexas | August 16, 2010, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Edward and Jamie,
Once again the idea is that only the victims, some of which are Christians, need to be forgiving and sensitive. Something should be expected from the Muslims. It matters way to much to them to build it right there and there are questions about the leaders and where the money is coming from. If built, it will turn out badly when things come to light.

Posted by: LB | August 16, 2010, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

LB, I agree with what you are saying to a degree, and yes, things might get ugly. However, going against it will make things that much worse. I just feel that some people are against it, simply because they are against Muslims. 20/20 Did a study and sent people into a bakery in one of the cities in the US and they were denied service because they were Muslims. Some were against the storekeeper and other clapped and cheered him on. Not all Muslims are terrorists, as well as not all Americans want war in Afghanistan and Iraq not to mention other countries whom are being threatened to be at war with the US. I love the US and I love the freedom to live as an individual with rights, but with this controversy I feel like this right is taken away from me somehow. If in a conservative neighbourhood, someoen were to come and open a strip joint, people will be against him / her but then someone is going to stand up and say, you have no case they have the right to excersise their freedom.

Posted by: 75JamieTx | August 17, 2010, 1:36 am 1:36 am

We the people know the Constitutitution
and President Obama put it well -we are
free to build on private property if app
roved by the local city ordinances if it
is OK with the Mayor why Republicans are
angry with pres.Obama? after all we have
in America Mosque’s and Muslims Temples
and they have not been closed by the Gov
erment,and our war Pres.Bush said was no
with Islam but with Alkeida & Terrorists
I Want Republicans to explain the Consti
tution to the SCJ.And for their lack of of knowledge the people should not vote
for them on this coming Nov.Elections

Posted by: fred conti | August 17, 2010, 4:28 am 4:28 am

Come on people we can’t be prejudice now! You can’t blame all Muslims for what a group of extremists did. That would be like blaming all the Germans for what Hitler did.

Posted by: Nikki George | August 17, 2010, 7:14 am 7:14 am

if we deny one relgion to build then sooner or later all relgions will be banned to build. what ever happened to our free right to worship as we please? the republicans always seem to find something to cause problems and unrest…maybe they are really the new nazi party undercover of the republican party. the constitution should always be at the top of the list when considing decisions such as this.

Posted by: MICHAEL SAGER | August 18, 2010, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.