Obama: GOP ‘Betting On Amnesia’ in The November Elections
From Yunji de Nies and Sunlen Miller:
Speaking at a fundraiser hauling in $500,000 for the Democratic party today, President Obama said that the Republican party is “betting on amnesia” going into the November election, as they have not had a “single, solitary” new idea.
“It's not like they've engaged in some heavy reflection,” Obama said of the Republican party in Atlanta today. “They have not come up with a single, solitary new idea to address the challenges of the American people. They don't have a single idea that's different from George Bush's ideas, not one. Instead, they're betting on amnesia.”
In a refrain that President Obama will likely say many times between now and the election, Obama told the crowd that the choice in the election is between going forward or going backward to the hurtful policies of the past.
“I do want to point out, when you get in your car, when you go forward, what do you do? You put it in ‘D.’ When you want to go back, what do you do? You put it in ‘R.’ We don't want to go into reverse back in the ditch. “
The president said that Republicans are much more interested in the next election rather than the next generation – and blasted the blockage of a vote on the small business jobs bill in the Senate.
“Republicans say they're the pro-business party. Isn't that what they say? You would think this is a bill that they would want to pass. And yet, day after day, week after week, they keep on stalling this bill and stonewalling this bill and opposing this bill. Why? Pure politics.”
Tickets to today’s fundraiser for the DNC started at $1000 each, and about 200 people were in attendance. One notable person not in attendance: former governor and current gubernatorial candidate, Roy Barnes.
The Barnes campaign said that he had previously scheduled campaign events and was not able to attend the fundraiser with the president today. But it also might be a matter of just smart politics, as Barnes tries to win office as a Democrat in a Republican stronghold that McCain carried in 2008.
-Yunji de Nies and Sunlen Miller
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
“I do want to point out, when you get in your car, when you go forward, what do you do? You put it in ‘D.’ When you want to go back, what do you do? You put it in ‘R.’ We don’t want to go into reverse back in the ditch. “
****
Catchy. And so true :>)
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Both parties had better hope for – short and long term – voter memory loss.
Posted by: Dontget818 | August 2, 2010, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Jake, any comment on John McCain’s tweet “Anyone else miss @jaketapper yesterday?”
Seems Sen. McCain found you a more GOP friendly host/interview. Huh
Posted by: Jonze | August 2, 2010, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Then Jesus gave the following illustration: “Can one blind person lead another? Won’t they both fall into a ditch?
Posted by: Chiara | August 2, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“I do want to point out, when you get in your car, when you go forward, what do you do? You put it in ‘D.’ When you want to go back, what do you do? You put it in ‘R” – President NoBo
Yes Cara, that’s catchy.
When you are headed for a cliff it’s actually better to put the car in “R” than to put it in “D” and go over the edge.
So True!
Posted by: Noz | August 2, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
But Cara, doesn’t your car also have instructions in French?
Posted by: Nephron | August 2, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
That’s right PRESIDENT Obama. We got the car out of the ditch! Let’s not set everything into reverse or R for Republican.
I’ll always remember how Republicans screwed things up.
With the Obama administration, I see a clearly paved road that is far better for America.
Posted by: sunnyshineyday | August 2, 2010, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
sunny, then you better get some new glasses cause the ones you got are not working!
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | August 2, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
But Cara, doesn’t your car also have instructions in French?
Posted by: Nephron | Aug 2, 2010 4:15:53 PM
In French? No.
Weird question. I have no idea what your point is. I drive a Volvo.
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Noz, you are too funny! Funny but right!
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | August 2, 2010, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Once again the GOP just doesn’t get it.
Well, for many of, us we will never, NEVER forget what the last republican president did. We will never forget!
GOP = no new ideas
GOP = constantly rejects Obama’s
ideas, they have no new ideas.
GOP = Doesn’t care if you have
healthcare insurance. No new
ideas to get all health coverage.
GOP = Doesn’t care if your kid can read
and/or write. No new ideas for
our pathetics school system.
GOP = Gripes that not enough jobs have
been created. No new idea to
create jobs.
GOP VS America!
Posted by: jackson | August 2, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
When you are headed for a cliff it’s actually better to put the car in “R” than to put it in “D” and go over the edge.
****
Actually if being in R brought you to the edge of the cliff, not so much. But you try it, and I’ll watch. Put it back on R and gun it.
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Obama seems to forget — if congress was capable of passing ‘pro-business’ legislation at will, we wouldn’t have any problems with the economy, right?
When Obama was senator, when did he take the opportunity to sponsor and pass ‘pro-business’ legislation? It sounds like he has regrets and wants to become part of the legislative branch again — instead of concentating on his responsibilities in the executive branch.
ABC, with his obviously facetious comments, Obama has given you another opportunity to ask him real questions. Don’t miss your chance…
Posted by: Mike, CO | August 2, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Oh, and Noz, crank your Lady Gaga jam while you’re at it.
Posted by: from neocons to crazy cons! | August 2, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Funny but right!
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | Aug 2, 2010 4:33:36 PM
Whats going on is your stuck on R for repeat, repeat, repeat…
Posted by: from neocons to crazy cons! | August 2, 2010, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Cara,I think that Volvo is a good car for the snow up there-eh?
Posted by: Nephron | August 2, 2010, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
I’m not disappointed in Obubba one bit..I knew he’d suck all along
Posted by: jt | August 2, 2010, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Cara,I think that Volvo is a good car for the snow up there-eh?
Posted by: Nephron | Aug 2, 2010 4:47:44 PM
Ah. Some odd game to find out where I live. You could just ask. Wisconsin. And yeah, its good in winter.
Posted by: from neocons to crazy cons! | August 2, 2010, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
“Weird question. I have no idea what your point is. I drive a Volvo.”
Cara, I think I may have figured it out.
See Nephron is a tin foil hatter believing in all manner of conspiracies.
I think he thinks you are an old poster here under a new name. That old poster was also the source of a conspiracy where she was from Canada or something and therefore her opinion (which usually filleted the right wing) was inconsequential.
Kind of scary that I know how he thinks.
BTW, his next move will likely be to accuse me of being you.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Posted by: from neocons to crazy cons! | August 02, 2010 at 04:53 PM
Oh, that was me. I was playing with a screen name change, inspired by something on another thread, and of course, Klifhoffer’s piece. But anywho…
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
“What exactly is the Republican party FOR?”
For burning down Mosque playgrounds?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
I love it. Mr. President keep talking, we’re listening. “The Republicans care about the next election, not the next generation.” OBVIOUSLY.
Posted by: sunnyshineyday | August 2, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
I bet he does wish that many forget but alas we know who took the house and senate along with he,a then junior Senator. Until of course he ran off and started running for President.
And what some of us won’t forget is that while he is out playing politics, schmozing with very deep pocketed Democrats, we have actual American citizens – law enforcement offcials- being threatened by drug cartels south of the border and it is he who is actually suing a state that wants to protect their own citizens.
And about that “8″ percent unemployment that has remained near 10 percent for how long now?
Posted by: david | August 2, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Roy Barnes thank you for acting like an adult and taking the part of our country. You may be a democrat, but you stand up publicly for what you believe.It is getting easier every day to be ashamed at the crooked goings on in our country.
I thank you.
Posted by: Debbie | August 2, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
So Cara is also “from neocons to crazycons”-you got so excited that you forgot to change your name! Gee tierra,I didn’t think that this would be so easy.
Posted by: Nephron | August 2, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
kyle writes: Most voters know which party had the supermajority, shoved unpolpular bills down their throats, and spent money so recklessly that their kids/grandkids will have to pay.
————————————-
Hey Kyle, where the heck were you when Bushie started a bogus war that cost billions of dollars? I don’t like the idea of my grandkids paying for that monumental mistake!
Where were you when Bushie past the first stimulous package? I don’t want my grandkids paying for that either!
Just where were all you concerned people when Bushie destroyed the economy and spent all of Clinton’s surplus?
Just where were you all?
Posted by: jackson | August 2, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Ryan,I don’t think that you are a Canadian,although you may live in Canadensis!
Posted by: Nephron | August 2, 2010, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Republicans are blaming Obama for the economy?
THEY have amnesia or are delusional.
(R3)=Republicans, want Repeat of Remedial Bush Administration policies.
Posted by: sunnyshineyday | August 2, 2010, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
The dictator thinks that no one has noticed?????
Lots of us, have noticed.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 2, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
BTW, his next move will likely be to accuse me of being you.
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 2, 2010 4:54:01 PM
Ha! Another one for the blog (why crazy cons are crazy, need better title but I’ve been collecting quite a list for midterms, and its fun to visit comment threads and find common tactics and ways of thinking to add to the list, so keep going cons, you’re hilarious!)
Thanks for the heads up, Ryan. I figured he wanted to know if the America I lived in was real enough in one way or another. If I’m from unreal America (stage whisper: the city), then of course, I can be shot or dismissed or smeared or something like that.
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
“I do want to point out, when you get in your car, when you go forward, what do you do? You put it in ‘D.’ When you want to go back, what do you do? You put it in ‘R.’ We don’t want to go into reverse back in the ditch.“
Don’t know about the rest of America, but the view in the rear view mirror is much better than what I see out my windshield…
BTW – The One claims we are “out of the ditch”…based on what evidence???
Posted by: tjp612 | August 2, 2010, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
So Cara is also “from neocons to crazycons”-you got so excited that you forgot to change your name! Gee tierra,I didn’t think that this would be so easy.
Posted by: Nephron | Aug 2, 2010 5:02:40 PM
I changed it briefly to add additional comment on another thread. And on that post I signed it Cara so its pretty intriguing that you think that its some sort of coup to figure it all out, when,as it turns out, I pointed out the screen name change myself. What does it mean to you that you’d get so excited about it?
The interior workings of the crazy con mind are very fascinating to me.
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Yeah, that’s how much republicans love this country. They are willing to spend tax payer money on frivolous acusations against Dems so that they can distract from their own failures. When that doesn’t work, they spread lies to simply discredit, like they did with Sherrod. If that doesn’t work, they go after groups, African Americans, Latinos, Homosexuals, Teachers, Assembly Workers, etc.
They rip off money from services to the people (cuts in funds and taxes, bogus wars), then blame the people for not functioning well without the money.
It’s amazing that anyone who is not in the top 2% of income would ever vote Republican. It’s amazing that anyone with any conscience in the top 2% would ever vote Republican.
Posted by: sunnyshineyday | August 2, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
What exactly is the Republican party FOR? We saw their policies in the past – and the results – in fact their tax cuts are STILL in effect. Wonderful job they’ve done in keeping the economy strong and moving forward positively.
What else has the Republican party got for policies? Anything?
Posted by: Rene | Aug 2, 2010 5:19:59 PM
Today Eric Cantor conceded when pushed (after first offering a gallant attempt at to defend defending the GOP’s push to preserve Bush tax cuts, even as they fuel the huge deficits that Republicans love to rail against) that “um, if you have less revenues coming into the federal government, and more expenditures, what does that add up to? Certainly you’re gonna dig the hole deeper. ” (interview with savannah guthrie)
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
hahahahaha…Barry,,,you crack us up…
No, we will REMEMBER in November…We’ll remember how you and your minions shoved the “health care” bill down our throats, We’ll remember that your “stimulis” didn’t stimulate anything but your political buddies…We’ll remember that you didn’t close Gitmo, that you pardoned the NBPP, that you spent more time golfing than governing, that the skimmers were prevented from doing their job to protect your union thugs, that you have essentially divided this country in an UNPRECIDENTED way on class, race and political party.
You should hope and pray we get amnesia.
November 2 2010
November 2 2012
Take back America.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 2, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
What happens when you promise everything and deliver nothing!
Obama is about to find out…
America didn’t ask for a Bush 3rd term, and Obama and the Congress ignored the voice of the people to protect the miltary, financial, pharmaceutical and big government industrial complex.
Now you either work for the government, or you get welfare. That is not a sign of success, only ineptitude and pathetic failure.
America deserves better… Vote independent. How could a 3rd party do ANY worse!!!
Posted by: CBA | August 2, 2010, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
“The Democrats have been in control of Congress since 2006–but nice try Obama.”
The Democrats took over Congress in 2007.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Does anyone remember what happened during the Bush Admin. when health care was being discussed thanks to Michael Moore’s movie? There was an all out campaign against the American people. They used overweight Americans as their scape goats and the media when berserk on overweight people because the Republicans made that group the target of the day.
Compassion in the rest of us, made us see through it all.
Republicans are ruthless and they can afford to be because big business that does not want any civil or environmental restrictions always support the party that allows irresponsible profit.
I’m surprised they haven’t gone after welfare recipients this time. They don’t exactly go after the elderly for their social security, although they do try to bamboozle them into privatizing SS. Yeah, we know who the real con artists are.
Dems across the board again in 2010!
Posted by: sunnyshineyday | August 2, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
What are we pretending are the cutoff dates from the GOP being responsible to the Dems being responsible?
Isn’t the former Senator Obama, the guy who was in the majority party for 2 years before becoming President, the guy who participated in filibusters, they guy who voted *for* spending bills, the one counting on Americans having amnesia?
Posted by: MayBee | August 2, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
So Cara,you are from Wisc.-har-har.What beer comes in a blue can? Hint-it ain’t Labatt’s.
Posted by: Nephron | August 2, 2010, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“So Cara,you are from Wisc.-har-har.What beer comes in a blue can? Hint-it ain’t Labatt’s.”
What is up with the right wing posters here wanting to know where female posters live?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
I remember clearly the side Obama has taken as Senator and POTUS….The side of the people.
I remember clearly the side Bush and Republicans took as governor and potus; the side of the wealthy (that includes him) and big business. Bush always screwed the people in the middle and at the bottom. Oh but he gave everyone nick names….like that was so cool!
Posted by: sunnyshineyday | August 2, 2010, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
“Weren’t the Democrats encouraging the banks to give home loans to anybody and their brother, whether they could afford it or not?”
No, that would be banks encouraging such activities when they hid the risk from those asset in profitable derivatives. See no one had to force banks to manipulate money to make immense profits. And the brokerage houses went along for the ride.
What they did not count on was an accelerating default rate thanks to the Bush economy turning those “profitable” derivatives not just back into pumpkins but into toxic assets.
“And who encouraged ACORN to use their loud mouths to pressure the banks?”
Do you support banks denying credit based on your skin color or neighborhood versus your individual credit worthiness?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Barack baby,we won’t be forgetting a thing come November.
Posted by: bobmac | August 2, 2010, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Obama, has a little Amnesia of his own. He was part of the Democratic majority in Congress that took a $162 billion deficit in 2007 when Dems took over Congress and increased it to over 500 billion in 2008. Since he took over office and the Dems have had a super majority, they have added $2.6 trillion to the debt in 18 months an dstill have a 9.5% unemployment rate. Speaking of forgetting, Obama forgets that it was the Republican led Congress under Newt Gingrich in 1995 to 2000 that brought the deficit under control while working hand in hand with Clinton. Lastly, Fannie and Freddie fall sqaurely on the Dems such as Frank, Dodd and Schumer. John McCain and Bush propsed legislation to reign in subprime lending to at-risk borrowers, Frank and Dodd killed it in Committees. Their relaxing of lending standards to at-risk borrowers is the largest single contributor to the housing market collapse. Yea, I won’t forget but I’m sure your hoping others do.
Posted by: John in VA | August 2, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Please….B u s h spent most of his presidency vacationing or playing golf. Yeah. Remember when Jenna had emergency surgery? Bush went golfing instead of being at her bedside. Touching.
Posted by: sunnyshineyday | August 2, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Barry still wants to run against Bush… that’s pretty sad, actually.
Sorry, Barry, but you’ll be wearing a LAME DUCK sign for your LAST two years in office… if you don’t get impeached first.
Posted by: Namako | August 2, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Hey Jake Tapper! Are you disappointed in the not being the permanent choice for THIS WEEK? For what it’s worth, I thought you did a decent job. You were pretty fair.
Posted by: irma | August 2, 2010, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
“He was part of the Democratic majority in Congress that took a $162 billion deficit in 2007 when Dems took over Congress and increased it to over 500 billion in 2008″
You mean when the Democrats started including the Iraq & Afghanistan war efforts in the budget?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Speaking of budgets,where is this year’s?
Posted by: Nephron | August 2, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
“John McCain and Bush propsed legislation to reign in subprime lending to at-risk borrowers,”
I think you are mixing up subprime loans with fannie and freddie.
Bush did advocate the creation of a new oversight org for Fannie & Freddie and in terms of sub prime loans in late 2007 he sought a voluntary freeze on the “teaser” interest rates from sub prime lenders(the right wing reaction to that was to call for his head).
McCain co sponsored a bill on FreddieFannie, that had been introduced twice, after it was left to wither in committee.
“Frank and Dodd killed it in Committees”
Frank and Dodd couldn’t kill it in committee, they were in the minority.
The GOP never brought it to the floor for a vote, apparently in 2005, Terri Schiavo was more important.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
It’s very clear that the majority DOSEN’T
like obama ideas.. This election is not about new ideas, it’s about opposeing his idea of a new America. Republicans and independants want to keep the American concepts of our constitution, and right to self determination.
Posted by: kr | August 2, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
“Republicans and independants want to keep the American concepts of our constitution, and right to self determination.”
Which is why Republicans oppose the building of non Christian houses of worship, want your children led in prayer by their teacher and preventing gay people from marrying.
Its all about self determination.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Obama is hoping people will have amnesia when it comes to his mass epic failures and total disconnect from American citizens.
We are counting the days ’til Nov…tick, tick, tick
Posted by: Teddy | August 2, 2010, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Ryan C
Your reaching – So you are OK with scrapping the basic concept of the constitution, forced rethinking – Yes, to our school children, while they chant
obama slogans. There are as many conservative democrats who oppose gay marriage. Whats with the building of non christian buildings?
Religion as we knew it is a dead issure in this country. What will be the new religion and political direction with obamas new ideas?
Posted by: kr | August 2, 2010, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
“One notable person not in attendance: former governor and current gubernatorial candidate, Roy Barnes.”
Hey Barry, why are so many of your pol pals distancing themselves from you? You think Roy is betting on some amnesia too?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 2, 2010, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“Yes, to our school children, while they chant obama slogans.”
Oh you mean the elementary school pageant that 7 months AFTER it happened FoxNews aired an edited video screaming indoctrination? Which resulted in irate right wingers issuing death threats to school administrators (gee do we see a pattern) causing the school to go to lockdown.
Let’s repeat that, an elementary school with kids age 6 to 11 had to go to lockdown because right wingers acting on misinformation from FoxNews issued death threats.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
I think Obama and the Democratic’s are praying to their TAX god for Americans to have amnesia in Nov. They have all but ruined this country and 60% of the American people believe that. They know full well they have ignored the will of the people and that it was the Republicans who stood against the handouts,bailouts and health care that the American people did not want. I hope the American People do not get Amnesia or stupid again and thorough every last liberal democrats out of office. Since 2007 when they took control this country has been in a steady decline and most American agree with that as well. In spite of what the lying liberals and Democrats tell you you can use your brain and check out the facts for yourself. Check the Debt in 2006 and the budget and the unemployment. What changed in 2007 is the Democrats took power. Since then they say it was the Republicans but it was the Demos who created all of this mess just look up the facts for yourself. Do not believe me or anyone check it out for your self and then vote these lying bums out of office.
Posted by: Wade Johnson | August 2, 2010, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Ryan C
obama has publically announced his desire to have a private army, with the same power as the established military.
This army would not pledge to protect and defend the constitution. I thought
I heard him make that pledge when sworn
in. Did you hear that to, or am I dreaming?
This is a matter of up holding the law of the land, not fox news propaganda.
He has plans for the American people, and it not a big Mack and fries, or a BLT
Posted by: kr | August 2, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
an elementary school with kids age 6 to 11 had to go to lockdown because right wingers acting on misinformation from FoxNews issued death threats.
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 2, 2010 7:18:03 PM
Why is there always misinformation coming from right wing news outlets, blogs, crib notes on hands?
The attack on elementary school kids was particularly disgusting, and its not the first time right wingers have chosen to go that route.
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
BTW, if you want to talk about indoctrination, the right wing nuts on the Texas Board of Ed decided to rewrite history.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
“Why is there always misinformation coming from right wing news outlets, blogs, crib notes on hands?”
Its similar to the game put out by conspiracy theorists.
See the right wing media have secret information that the mainstream media doesn’t want you to have.
Those who question such information are non believers or even heretics (see Kathleen Parker on Palin or David Frum’s latest).
You can see the exact same mentality on birther sites, 9/11 truthers, FEMA camps, even back to Kennedy.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
“Which is why Republicans oppose the building of non Christian houses of worship”
I guess you’re referring to the mosque at the WTC. 54% of New Yorkers are against it. So when did New York become a Republican stronghold?
Posted by: Sigmonde | August 2, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
“obama has publically announced his desire to have a private army, with the same power as the established military.”
I realize the right wing treks in tin foil versus reality but Obama was speaking of an army of volunteers.
His speech that right wingers deliberately quote out of context.
” [As] president I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots [from 75,000] and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals, like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their effort connected to a common purpose.
People of all ages, stations and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem – they are the answer. So we are going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We’ll call on Americans to join an energy corps, to conduct renewable energy and environmental clean-up projects in their neighborhoods all across the country.
We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, and to be there for our military families. And we’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy. We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set.
We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. We need to use technology to connect people to service. We’ll expand USA Freedom Corps to create online networks where American can browse opportunities to volunteer. You’ll be able to search by category, time commitment and skill sets. You’ll be able to rate service opportunities, build service networks, and create your own service pages to track your hours and activities.
This will empower more Americans to craft their own service agenda and make their own change from the bottom up”
You are of course not alone in this mistaken belief.
Perhaps you will stopping reading sources that lie to you and make you look foolish in public.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“I guess you’re referring to the mosque at the WTC. 54% of New Yorkers are against it.”
Mostly do to right wing fear mongering and misrepresenting the mosques location.
Regardless, freedom is not up to an opinion poll.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“Speaking of forgetting, Obama forgets that it was the Republican led Congress under Newt Gingrich in 1995 to 2000 that brought the deficit under control while working hand in hand with Clinton”
Working hand in hand?
Next got his butt handed to him because he tried to shut down the government because he did not like his seat on Air Force 1.
Most bills were street fights even the ones that each side eventually compromised on.
Then the GOP went after Clinton for affairs.
Gingrich ended up resigning not because of his hypocrisy of cheating on his cancer stricken wife (a scumbag move later repeated by John Edwards) but because under his “leadership” the GOP suffered the first loss of seats for a President opposing majority.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Ryan C
Than why does this group need destructive weapons? and be part of the National guard?
We already have a Peace Corp. don’t we?
Why does he need a private force? I guess the current military force is double dumb.
Posted by: kr | August 2, 2010, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
“Than why does this group need destructive weapons? and be part of the National guard?”
What weapons? What part of the National Guard?
“We already have a Peace Corp. don’t we?”
Yes and Obama during that speech was proposing to double it.
I suppose offering a discussion on the merits of soft power would be way way over your head.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Well, Wade, while there’s no doubt your ramblings are fascinating, they don’t mean much, really, as its all opinion, and I can easily counter it. After all, I think Republicans believe in and pray to their TAX fairy– the one who somehow magically makes it so cuts in taxes with no cuts in spending while paying for two wars by borrowing from China have no effect on the deficit. They also believe in and pray to a deregulation fairy— and quickly find someone else to scapegoat when deregulation results in and economic meltdown, oil spill, whatever. Republicans have all but ruined this country and for Republican starts have said so. Don’t believe me? Read David Stockman’s latest op-ed in the NYT, or Bruce Bartlett’s latest book or blog posts from the past year. More than 60% of the American people realize that. Their mistake is that they think the Republicans won’t do the same thing they did when Bush was in charge if they take over Congress and/or the Senate and/or the executive branch again. The Republicans know full well they have ignored the will of the people when it comes to more stimulus for job creation, health care reform, financial regulation reform, extending unemployment benefits and so much more, and that it was the Democrats who have a track record of growing the middle class, being fiscally responsible, legislating when there’s a crisis that can’t be kicked down the road and creating jobs I, too, hope the American People do not get Amnesia, although many claim they were asleep and were awoken by a sleeping giant roaring so maybe I should say that now that their awake I hope they’ll look into the facts because regardless of what people like Boehner say, economics and GDP and stuff like that matters. Since 1980 the middle class has been in a steady decline — real wages tell the story. In spite of what the lying neocons, crazy cons, and Republicons tell you, you can use your brain and check out the facts for yourself. Check the public debt and deficits under Reagan, Bush and Bush. Check the CBO scores on the deficit Bush handed off to Obama. Do not believe me or anyone– but also don’t be fooled by those who don’t look at the long game. Go back to 1980 or 1973 and check it out for your self, year by year, up to now, and then vote the cons –crazy, neo, whatever– out of office.
Even Cantor has now conceded the Bush tax cuts dig a deeper hole.
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Ryan C
Your a beauty, and a fountian of unlimited knowledge. Your boy hits a brick wall in Nov.
Do you support the constitution, and are you ready to defend its principle
and what it stands for?
Posted by: kr | August 2, 2010, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
“Regardless, freedom is not up to an opinion poll.”
Why are so many New Yorkers against the mosque? BTW where is the movement by Republicans to oppose building non Christian houses of worship?
Posted by: Sigmonde | August 2, 2010, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Also, chew on this: From 1951 to 1980, when America’s top marginal tax rate was between 70 and 92 percent, the nation’s average annual growth was 3.7 percent. Between 1983 and 2008, when the top rate was far lower – ranging between 35 and 39 percent – the economy grew an average of just 3 percent per year. “Supply-siders are fond of claiming that Ronald Reagan’s 1981 cuts caused the 1980s economic boom. In fact, that boom followed Reagan’s 1982 tax increase. The 1990s boom likewise was not the result of a tax cut; it came in the wake of Bill Clinton’s 1993 tax increase.”(Robert Reich)
In addition, while Wall Street’s excesses were the proximate cause of the Great Recession, its fundamental cause lay in the nation’s widening inequality.
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
“Do you support the constitution, and are you ready to defend its principle
and what it stands for?”
Of course.
Thought I wish right wingers demanding we uphold the Constitution take the time to actually learn about it, including the history of the Supreme Court.
“Your boy hits a brick wall in Nov.”
He’s a grown man and the President of the United States.
He also does not face re-election until 2012.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
“BTW where is the movement by Republicans to oppose building non Christian houses of worship”
Sarah Palin is no longer a Republican?
Peter King is no longer a Republican?
Rick Lazio is no longer a Republican?
Rudy Gulliani is no longer a Republican?
Heck, Newt Gingrich is even using his opposition to the mosque to fund raise for his bazillionth Presidential exploratory committee.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Actually, Wade, they should go and look up
1. What was the national debt and deficit, both annual and total, but not just since 2007, from 1970 onward. Look at the long game, and include the real problem. Be sure to note who was in charge in the admin, senate and congress. Pay special note to what happened after 1980.
2. What were the unemployment number and job creation numbers from 1970 onward ?
3. What was the national budget?
4. What was the misery index and real average hourly earnings?
5. At the brink of the Great Depression and the recent Great Recession, what was the inequality gap, and what created it?
Posted by: Cara | August 2, 2010, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
” [As] president I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots [from 75,000] and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals…”
Posted by: Ryan C |
I notice Barry doesn’t give that speech anymore.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 2, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
“4. Who blocked presidents bushes attempt to regulate Freddie Mack and Fannie mea”
Republicans?
They controlled Congress.
They never even brought a vote on FannieFreddie to the floor.
“the ones that caused the whole financial meltdown?”
Fannie Freddie did not cause the economic crisis.
What caused the crisis was Wall Street hiding the risk of subprime loans and selling them as profitable derivatives.
It was a house of cards that when the housing bubble popped and the Bush economy showed its true colors fell dragging the economy with it.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
“I notice Barry doesn’t give that speech anymore.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Aug 2, 2010 8:10:21 PM”
Could that be because the Serve America Act was passed and signed into law?
Cmon foggy surely you remember parroting the right wing talking points on this last year.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
It was a house of cards that when the housing bubble popped…
Posted by: Ryan C |
The housing bubble popped? When?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 2, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
“That is why the people in America watch FOX news three to one over any other news.”
The audience of any of the network new casts is actually 2 to 3 times that of FoxNews peak audience.
FoxNews leads CNN and MSNBC in cable news.
And even then you’re talking about maybe 4 or 5 million people that rely on cable news and that is being quite generous.
Right wingers like FoxNews because they put on pretty women to read right wing talking points.
You’ll notice that Ann Coulter has not been on as much lately since her adam’s apple returned to prominence.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Generic Congressional Vote
Gallup 7/26 – 8/1 Rep: 48% Dem: 43%
Rasmussen 7/26 – 8/1 Rep: 46% Dem: 38%
FOX News 7/27 – 7/28 Rep: 47% Dem: 36%
Reuters/Ipsos 7/22 – 7/25 Rep: 46% Dem: 44%
CNN/Opinion Research 7/16 – 7/21 Rep: 49% Dem: 44%
Quinnipiac 7/13 – 7/19 Rep: 43% Dem: 38%
Source: RCP
Posted by: Mary | August 2, 2010, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
*****
Why does he need a private force?
*****
When all the wars end, the current military will become ex-military (a/k/a civilians). They will become the enfamous “civilian national security force”.
Posted by: CommonSense | August 2, 2010, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
We saw their policies in the past – and the results – in fact their tax cuts are STILL in effect
Posted by: Rene
And? Perhaps you should read what happens to an economy when those who have it, don’t spend it. But to your point. The President has characterized Republicans as reckless spenders and I really couldn’t agree more however to hide behind who was in charge when in fact he and his ilk were in charge from 2006 to 2008 is silliness on his part.
Further more take a read on any article containing grove parc in chicago the absolute waste of taxpayers dollars and who exactly was responsible for getting the money, who got rich from it and who exactly managed the projects which for the most part was a complete disaster.
I’ll give you a hint, his last name starts with B but it ain’t Booooosh.
Posted by: david | August 2, 2010, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Hey Maxine Waters obnoxious,dumb and corrupt is no way to go through life.
Posted by: bobmac | August 2, 2010, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
More good news.Al Gore’s molesting charges against his masseuse in Oregon have been dropped.The session that took place in his hotel room at midnite apparently was a benign event.When more details are available I’m sure the Journolistas will fill us in.
Posted by: bobmac | August 2, 2010, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
More good news.Al Gore’s molesting charges against his masseuse in Oregon have been dropped.
Posted by: bobmac |
I just love happy endings.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 2, 2010, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 2, 2010 8:21:24 PM
From Mediaite (8/2/10):
“The White House Correspondents Association has reportedly reached a decision on who gets Helen Thomas’s much-coveted briefing room seat. From Mike Allen:
Congrats to White House Correspondents’ Board on its hard work: AP moves to Helen’s center seat, Fox to AP’s front-row seat, NPR to 2nd row.”
Ouch.
Posted by: Mary | August 2, 2010, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Ryan C wrote:”Which is why Republicans oppose the building of non Christian houses of worship”
.
So why can’t you just call it what it really is… a mosque? Did you get that from the Journolist talking points that recommend you hide certain words in less precise terminology?
Posted by: gk | August 2, 2010, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Republicans are the party of NO Socialism, NO Marxism, NO Obamacare, NO Failed Stimulus, NO Cap and Tax. In other words, NO more crap from liberal Dems.
Who is John Galt?
Posted by: Kevin from Wisconsin | August 2, 2010, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
If this mosque is approved tomorrow Bloomberg will be my new hobby.Mikey thinks of himself as presidential material.He spends millions on his mayoral campaign in the second most liberal city in the country and almost loses.His biggest contribution to NYC is trying to get the restaurants to stop serving salt.PC idiot.
Posted by: bobmac | August 2, 2010, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Sadly, But I remember! Yep, I remember when there were a “MIDDLE class”, loyal workers to their companies….Reagan changed all of that, beginning to create the Haves and Have Nots in this country. “How’s that “trickle-down thingy” working for you now. I WILL/Do remember.
Posted by: sara | August 2, 2010, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
“Congrats to White House Correspondents’ Board on its hard work: AP moves to Helen’s center seat, Fox to AP’s front-row seat, NPR to 2nd row.”
Ouch.”
What’s ouch about it?
All three moved up a spot.
Fox, failing in its hard lobbying for Helen’s old seat, might be a little miffed since they care far more about the appearance of credibility versus actually building and maintaining credibility but to call it an ouch is a little extreme.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
“Who is John Galt?”
The mythic flawless hero created by an author who died alone and bitter.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
“Looks like the Texas Board of Education are not the only ones trying to rewrite history.”
Agreed the right wing is attempting to rewrite history in many ways from text books to rewriting the bible to be more Conservative friendly.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
“If this mosque is approved tomorrow Bloomberg will be my new hobby”
Shocking that a right winger would become obsessive.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
“In other words, you didn’t read them, or you just don’t understand them”
I realize its hard for you to make connections without there being dots but my point stands that the GOP went after Clinton for his affairs.
If the articles of impeachment had nothing to do with them then the revelations about Henry Hyde, Bob Livingston, etc (the list goes for a little while so I will spare you the humiliation) would not have turned American opinion on its ear.
The American people saw it for what it was…a witch hunt by the desperate and hypocritical GOP and punished the GOP at the ballot box while rewarding Clinton with high approval numbers.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 2, 2010, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Agreed the right wing is attempting to rewrite history in many ways from text books to rewriting the bible to be more Conservative friendly.
Posted by: Ryan C |
Nobodies rewriting no bibles on Ryan’s watch.
Meanwhile, Barry is taking credit for keeping Bush’s schedule for withdrawal.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 2, 2010, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Fight the socialist is enough of an idea.
Posted by: nat turner | August 2, 2010, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
The American people saw it for what it was…a witch hunt by the desperate and hypocritical GOP and punished the GOP at the ballot box
Posted by: Ryan C |
There’s some rewriting of history. Are you a right-winger?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 2, 2010, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Ryan C wrote: “while rewarding Clinton with high approval numbers.”
.
Typical Democrats… rewarding perjury and obstruction of justice.
Posted by: gk | August 2, 2010, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
What has he Oduma really done but slowly destroy us with his Marxist Ideals and ideas.Sorry Mr Presendante you need to go,Rome burns while you play get the idea?
Posted by: Raymond | August 2, 2010, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Ryan C wrote:”I realize its hard for you to make connections without there being dots but my point stands that the GOP went after Clinton for his affairs.”
.
Guess thats why ol’ horndog Bill settled with Paula Jones for $850K because the GOP forced him into it.
Posted by: gk | August 3, 2010, 12:00 am 12:00 am
“Meanwhile, Barry is taking credit for keeping Bush’s schedule for withdrawal.”
ROFLMAO!
More like the Iraqis schedule as it should be, its their country.
Duck Mr. President!
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Did Henry hyde,Bob Livingston,etc. commit perjury before a grand jury?Remember Scooter Libby?Talk about amnesia.
Posted by: Nephron | August 3, 2010, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Rome burns while you play get the idea?
Posted by: Raymond | Aug 2, 2010 11:59:37 PM
No. Can you actually flesh that out into a few paragraphs without using the buzzwords Marxist and socialist? How exactly is Rome burning, when did the fire start and who is playing and how? More importantly, what will Republicans, if that is who you intend to vote for, do differently, specifically, that will put out the fire and rebuild, and how do you know that is what they will do?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 12:04 am 12:04 am
“Guess thats why ol’ horndog Bill settled with Paula Jones for $850K because the GOP forced him into it”
ROFLMAO!
Again, they chased him over affairs.
Perhaps he should have illegally funneled hush money to her thru his in laws like Sen Ensign because apparently that is ok with the right wing.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 12:05 am 12:05 am
More like the Iraqis schedule as it should be, its their country.
Posted by: Ryan C |
What’s a GOP talking point doing coming out of your brain?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Perhaps he should have illegally funneled hush money to her thru his in laws like Sen Ensign because apparently that is ok with the right wing.
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 3, 2010 12:05:41 AM
And, apparently, much of the corporate-owned media.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 12:09 am 12:09 am
“There’s some rewriting of history”
The GOP was the first to lose seats in the 2nd term when there was an opposing President in office.
Clinton’s approval ratings jumped to nearly 70% and remained around 60% (give or take a few pts) for the rest of his presidency.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Clinton admitted in his book that he perjured himself before a Grand Jury.He further admitted it by not contesting temporary disbarment.He got off lucky-you seemed mighty happy with the legal consequences of perjury with Scooter Libby,but seem unable to recognize a similar episode with Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Nephron | August 3, 2010, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Clinton pardoned FALN murderers with the help of Eric Holder.Holder has just gotten the leader of the FALN murderers this past month.Holder and his law firm represented terrorists at GITMO prior to President Liesalot making him AG.The left wing loons have no problem with this.
Posted by: bobmac | August 3, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am
In the target rich environment that is the US house, why did the Swamp Lady pick two black representatives to bring charges against?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am
“you seemed mighty happy with the legal consequences of perjury with Scooter Libby,”
When was I happy that Bush commuted his prison sentence?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am
“Guess thats why ol’ horndog Bill settled with Paula Jones for $850K because the GOP forced him into it”
Perhaps he should have illegally funneled hush money to her thru his in laws like Sen Ensign because apparently that is ok with the right wing.
Posted by: Ryan C |
You don’t think anyone was ever paid to keep quiet about Clinton?
Oh and perhaps he should have pardoned marc rich to help raise money to pay Ms. Jones.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 12:27 am 12:27 am
November 2nd will be here soon enough.Step one.
Posted by: bobmac | August 3, 2010, 12:31 am 12:31 am
All the bickering does not matter…
The President is busy rearranging the deck chairs on the Titantic… and directing the band as it plays “Nearer My God, to Thee”…
The truth is that there is gusher of public debt, city, state, federal washing over the nation… No one will escape the consequences, not one, not me, not you…
The cities and states will go first… it is already happening… then the Federal government will be forced to operate the printing presses at warp speed…
The dollar will collapse absolutely, accompanied by the economy…
There will be general unrest, followed by Martial Law…
Mr. Obama will be the supreme leader… backed up by military power…
Some will resist…
Posted by: Quo Warranto? | August 3, 2010, 12:33 am 12:33 am
The Washington Post sold Newsweek today for one dollar. Jon Meacham, soon to be a talking head on msnbc, must be mighty proud.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 12:48 am 12:48 am
“You don’t think anyone was ever paid to keep quiet about Clinton?”
Was he ever investigated by the FBI for it like Ensign?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 12:56 am 12:56 am
I think the President should be Proud that it has taken him only 2 years to make the Bush years seem like the “Good Old Days”
Democrats as an Independent I Beg YOU find a reasonable candidate for the 2012 Presidential Election or we will all watching as President Gingrich adresses a Republican Congress
Posted by: Rick | August 3, 2010, 5:50 am 5:50 am
Why Amnesia??? All you have to do is to have watched the GOP over the last 19 months…
They have been against the middle class in
favor of standing with Big Banks against regulations,with the Big Insurers against health care, with Big Oil against the people of the gulf calling money given up for the people of that area, a shakedown. which is pitiful…
They claim to care so much about the deficit yet they support the extension of Bush tax cuts that have and will continue to add to the DEFICIT…
You don’t have to have Amnesia all you have to do is pay attention to the idiocy they come up as they continually and consistently do NOTHING but political posturing….
Come on November!!!
Posted by: theafalcon200 | August 3, 2010, 6:36 am 6:36 am
It was a good speech. The Republicans are screaming the LOUDEST, because they aren’t getting their way. You have Boehner, who wants to take the country into reverse, taking away health care reform, not to mention wealth care reform. These people have good ideas when it comes to national security, but the problem is they are too busy looking to control the nation, with the dollars of the wealthy lining their pockets, with people like Boehner, and Demint leading the charge. They lose sight of what the right thing is. They could have made Health Insurance Reform, into Health CARE Reform, but their no. 1 goal was beating the President, with protecting the wealthy a close second. Their answer to health care was stop the malpractice suits, while at the same time doctors have people sign a waiver almost saying they can come in drunk, remove the wrong kidney, and kill, or disable someone, and they are not responsible. They support big business who were sending our jobs overseas which started much of this economic downturn, and downsizing, running ponzi schemes while unregulated, and many other things, and now are blackmailing the country with doing the same things if we tax them more. WHAT A CROCK!
Posted by: parma hts gary | August 3, 2010, 7:05 am 7:05 am
Tapper the Republicans are betting the American public and mainstream media have a 15 second attention span for the 2010 elections.
Now the Republicans will be spending 300,000,000 Corporation dollars this election year to remind everyone that they want a fresh start and for us to forget what they did under George W. Bush’s 8 years in the White House, they ran the economy into the ditch and made Main Street bail out Wall Street who act like nothing happened today by celebrating their current profits, by deregulating the Oil Industry the Republican’s contributed to the BP Oil Spill in the Gulf, the war in Afghanistan rages on because Bush and Republicans invaded Iraq and valuable resources were pulled out of Afghanistan.
The Republicans may want a fresh start to run in the 2010 and 2012 elections, but Main Street doesn’t get a fresh start until the economy is fixed, Gulf Oil Spill is cleaned up and our Troops with the help of our allies start to pull out of Afghanistan.
There are no instant solutions after Bush and the Republicans ran this country into the ground after 8 years. Democrats will hold their ground this Nov then the race for 2012 starts.
Posted by: Cooday | August 3, 2010, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Posted by: Cooday | Aug 3, 2010 8:35:08 AM
Both chambers of Congress have been run by DEMOCRATS for over 3-1/2 years.
Obama had supermajorities most of his term. He still has majorities. He got everything he wanted.
You have ObamaCare, you have Financial Reform, you have endless unemployment benefits and welfare, and you have more war in Afghanistan. Just as Obama promised.
Democrats have brought us unicorns, rainbows, and rivers of chocolate. Everything is peachy. Just ask Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi. There’s no need to get hysterical. Stop whining and enjoy the Recovery Summer.
Posted by: Mary | August 3, 2010, 8:44 am 8:44 am
““I do want to point out, when you get in your car, when you go forward, what do you do? You put it in ‘D.’ When you want to go back, what do you do? You put it in ‘R.’ We don’t want to go into reverse back in the ditch. “”
did our Commander in chief really say this??? This is a juvenile quip that sounds like it came from high school election campaign.
Please continue with this cheap rhetoric. It will lead to historic changes at the polls this November.
Posted by: J.R. | August 3, 2010, 8:54 am 8:54 am
“They claim to care so much about the deficit yet they support the extension of Bush tax cuts that have and will continue to add to the DEFICIT…”
Please…tax cuts do not add to deficits. That is our money. The only thing that adds to the deficit is the over spending by Congress that will cripple our country. We need a majority of fiscal conservatives elected this November and I don’t care if they are Independents, Tea Partiers, Libertarians, Repubs or Democrats. We need to start reducing the over-whelming size of our Federal Government, our founding fathers are no doubt looking down on us with shame.
Posted by: J.R. | August 3, 2010, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Matt Damon channeled George Washington yesterday and the first President and the founding fathers are supporting Democrats, President Obama and his team this year right through 2012. Reason? …
Republican Party: You have two cows. You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows. You are surprised when the cow drops dead.
Democratic Party has a heart: Vote Democrat 2010 & 2012!
Posted by: Cooday | August 3, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Matt Damon channeled George Washington yesterday and the first President and the founding fathers are supporting Democrats, President Obama and his team this year right through 2012. Reason? …
Republican Party: You have two cows. You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows. You are surprised when the cow drops dead.
Democratic Party has a heart: Vote Democrat 2010 & 2012!
Posted by: Cooday | August 3, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
“Well, for many of, us we will never, NEVER forget what the last republican president did. We will never forget!” – jackson
Yes Jackson don’t forget, no one should.
Bush abandoned his conservative principals. True conservatives are very upset about that. So much so that they didn’t come out in numbers to vote in 2008. Democrats are upset at the results of the Demo type decisions Bush made especially the overspending. Yet they keep defending their boy Obama who does 4x worse saying he’s not as bad as Bush was. But that is just a political talking point, lefty propaganda.
Yes voters don’t forget.
Vote for true conservatives this November.
Send a message, no more Republican Lites.
Posted by: Noz | August 3, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Cooday—–
Democratic Party: You have 2 cows and the government milks all your profits until you close the farm.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 3, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
“Please…tax cuts do not add to deficits”
You’re offering right-wing philosophical baloney in place of the most elementary understanding of a balance sheet.
Posted by: Skip | August 3, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Cooday,
You suggested “Vote Democrat 2010 & 2012″
Yeah, right!
Sorry, but that Kool-aid well has run dry. The INCUMBENTS are OUT in 90 days, 21 hours, and 46 minutes. Since there are more DEMOCRATS in office today than Republicans, guess who’s going to suffer the GREATEST LOSES?!!! Yeah, the Democrats.
But you keep drinking… ya hear?
Posted by: Namako | August 3, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Actually, that would be the Dems.
They are betting that the public will forget the Dems forced legislation upon them, they did not want.
They are betting that no one noticed the dictatorship.
They are betting that the lack of jobs will be overlooked.
Yes, it is the Dems, who are hoping for amnesia, among the voters.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 3, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
“You’re offering right-wing philosophical baloney in place of the most elementary understanding of a balance sheet.”
Skip, this is basic economics. The private sector is MUCH more efficient with its money than the public sector. Actual tax cuts that let people keep and invest their own money (as opposed to “refundable tax credits” that are welfare to those who don’t pay taxes), do not cause deficits. In fact, they spur more capital investment, which creates more jobs, and consequently more taxpayers. The more heavily you tax businesses, the higher the unemployment. Period.
Excessive deficit spending (along with massive unfunded mandates) causes deficits. The government needs to learn to live within its means like the rest of us. HALF of the current federal budget is DEBT. HALF!! That’s insanity.
Can you run your household when half of your annual spending is borrowed? No, you’d go bankrupt in a hurry. That’s exactly what the federal government is in the process of doing right now, except that they’re bankrupting multiple generations.
It doesn’t matter what liberals want. The spending WILL stop because there isn’t enough money to fund their utopia. Europe is dealing with it now via austerity measures and we will be there soon ourselves.
Posted by: Mary | August 3, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am
“Democratic Party has a heart: Vote Democrat 2010 & 2012! ”
The new and improved Democrat party. klansman-free in the US Senate for 30 days now!
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am
“Actual tax cuts that let people keep and invest their own money……do not cause deficits. In fact, they spur more capital investment, which creates more jobs, and consequently more taxpayers. The more heavily you tax businesses, the higher the unemployment. Period”
Nobody can say all these things are always false except for the “Period” part….these relationships are non-linear, the inputs are variable. Cutting taxes CAN spur investment, but you can’t guarantee it will under every circumstance. It’s like saying cutting taxes on capital gains increases revenue….except if you cut the tax rate to zero you don’t generate any revenue at all. The only way you can be fairly certain a tax cut won’t create a deficit is to cut spending to match it.
Posted by: Skip | August 3, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am
It doesn’t matter what liberals want. The spending WILL stop because there isn’t enough money to fund their utopia. Europe is dealing with it now via austerity measures and we will be there soon ourselves.
Posted by: Mary |
Austerity measures to the progressives is like water to the wicked witch of the west (the one from Oz not San Francisco).
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
“Austerity measures to the progressives is like water to the wicked witch of the west”
Then what was the general backlash against Carter for asking us to wear sweaters and turn our thermostats down? The Republicans have now become ardent conservationists eh? I doubt it. I think it’s more financial austerity for the middle-class while protecting the wealth and power of corporate America.
Posted by: Skip | August 3, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Then what was the general backlash against Carter for asking us to wear sweaters and turn our thermostats down?
Posted by: Skip |
Skip, Carter melted.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am
“The only way you can be fairly certain a tax cut won’t create a deficit is to cut spending to match it.”
Again, tax cuts do not create deficits. Over spending does. This is rudimentary budgeting. These deficits were created by Congress (both Republican and Democrat controlled) spending too much money than they were allotted.
Posted by: J.R. | August 3, 2010, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Again, tax cuts do not create deficits. Over spending does.
——-//
One way to avoid overspending is not cut taxes when you have no intention of cutting spending, and/or to not continue all of the tax breaks that were intended to expire, continuing to dig a bigger hole than you can afford.
Or are you so far in denial that you can’t see that either?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Austerity measures to the progressives is like water to the wicked witch of the west
——-/
Talking about austerity measures for cons is like crack, but when you look at a broad range of opinions from economists and experts you realize the honest answer to the question of whether fiscal retrenchments will boost or hurt growth is that as a whole they have no idea– and either do the non-experts. In most cases of successful austerity measures an important role was played by both depreciation of the exchange rate and strong external demand.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
“We don’t want to go into reverse back in the ditch.”
Says Mr. 41% Approval Rating.
Posted by: Libs and the Lying Liars Who Elect Them | August 3, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
obama is hoping the American people get amnesia and forget what he is doing. The stimulus feedback reports are coming out and it is ridiculous. he spent $1/2 million for windows at a place near Mt. St. Helens, THAT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR 3 YEARS!!!!
Posted by: DJ | August 3, 2010, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
“One way to avoid overspending is not cut taxes when you have no intention of cutting spending, and/or to not continue all of the tax breaks that were intended to expire, continuing to dig a bigger hole than you can afford. ”
Or just cut spending.
Posted by: J.R. | August 3, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Talking about austerity measures for cons is like crack, but when you look at a broad range of opinions from economists and experts you realize the honest answer to the question of whether fiscal retrenchments will boost or hurt growth is that as a whole they have no idea…
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? |
Did you have a point?
And if you want a consensus, ask your broad range of economists what failure to stop the insane spending by our national, state and local governments will do to growth.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
It is now clear, Obama made it verifiable: Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a TOTAL idiot! Can’t wait to “drain the swamp” of Democrats in November, then kick Obama out in 2012. Obama is a DISGRACE to America!
Posted by: David | August 3, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
“Please…tax cuts do not add to deficits.”
Sure they do if not accompanied by cuts in spending.
If you cut revenue while keeping spending the same, you end up with a deficit.
Also known as Bushnomics, a cousin of Reaganomics.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
“It doesn’t matter what liberals want. The spending WILL stop because there isn’t enough money to fund their utopia.”
That was the right wing plan with Busnomics,
Take a surplus run up spending while cutting taxes, watching deficits and debt explode.
Then claim the mantle of financial prudence.
Right wing ideology is entirely based on lies appealing to the worst instincts of human beings (selfishness, tribalism, authroitarian)
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Did you have a point?
——//
Do you? Most of the time you seem to creep around looking for opportunities to leech enough to produce a besides the point and who cares one-liner.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
“Did you have a point?”
A couple. Both were straightforward. Talking about austerity measures for cons is like crack. Doesn’t mean they’ll enact any in America as cons in America tend to run up deficits by voting in Republicans. It also doesn’t mean that if enacted, they’ll work (they could make matters much worse)– the buzz from talking about them for cons is enough.
Example:Remember when Cheney said deficits don’t matter?
He was expressing what Republicans believe. The only time deficits matter to Republicans is when deficits can be used to bash Democrats and liberals. Once in office at the federal level, they begin growing the federal deficit and public debt again.
For instance, now the right wing deficit peacocks are claiming the deficit matters, maybe, but not so much when it comes to extending the Bush tax breaks they chose to set an expiration date for (never mind that extending them across the board as the Republicans would like to do would dig a deeper hole, to use Cantor’s words.)
According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center: “The Bush tax cuts of 2001 to 2003 provided much less stimulus to the economy than other policies of equal cost would have. The underlying reason is that although the tax cuts were well-timed to provide a short-run economic stimulus, they were poorly designed for this task.”
The second point was that in most instances of successful austerity an important role was played by both depreciation of the exchange rate and strong external demand. Many economists are backing off calls for austerity measures. Others never thought they were the right call in the short term in the first place.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Right wing ideology is entirely based on lies appealing to the worst instincts of human beings (selfishness, tribalism, authroitarian)
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 3, 2010 1:50:08 PM
Straight to the point.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Funny, it seems like just last week he was saying, “There’s a time to campaign and there’s a time to lead.” I guess we all know he’s a horrible leader, so it’s back to campaign mode. He’s a disgrace to the office of the President.
Posted by: DaveInMN | August 3, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
To Ryan C:
Tax receipts increased in the years following the Bush tax cuts by 484B dollars. It’s also notable the tax receipts increased by $81B when Bill Clinton reduced the tax rates on capital gains.
In both cases, the Joint Committee on Taxation predicted that tax revenues would decrease dramatically. In the case of the Bush tax cuts, the JCT predicted a loss of revenues on order of $186B. In the case of the estate tax rate reduction under Clinton, they predicted a drop in revenues by $28B.
In both cases, they were dramatically wrong because the JCT failed to account for consumer/business behavior resulting from the reduction in tax rates.
To see that tax receipts increased in 2004,2005, 2006, and 2007 — the years after the Bush tax cuts were in effect. The recession that took hold in 2008 is the primary cause for the fall in tax revenues…less people working and paying taxes…less profits for businesses to pay taxes on.
Posted by: RMB | August 3, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
So right wingers, is Sharron Angle the worst candidate for major office since Bill Simon?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
DaveInMN writes: He’s a disgrace to the office of the President.
————————————-
Boy ole’ boy how soon we forget that last disgrace of a president. You know him, he cut taxes on the rich, started a bogus war, un-deregulated Wall St and oil companies and the list goes on and on. But something tells me you’d vote for him all over again!
Posted by: jackson | August 3, 2010, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
“Did you have a point?”
A couple.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? |
You are making points but not the ones you think as your post is incoherent. Perhaps you should copy/paste more of it.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
So right wingers, is Sharron Angle the worst candidate for major office since Bill Simon?
Posted by: Ryan C |
Clearly you have never heard of Alvin Greene.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
“But something tells me you’d vote for him (Bush) all over again!” – jackson
No Way Jackson!
We need to vote for True Conservatives.
If we would have done that we wouldn’t be in the mess we are in right now.
Posted by: Noz | August 3, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
You are making points but not the ones you think as your post is incoherent. Perhaps you should copy/paste more of it.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Aug 3, 2010 2:36:37 PM
Now, *that’s* a substantive point, and so very clever. What austerity measures will Republicans put in place? What will they do to create jobs? What is their agenda? Will they reduce the deficit? If so, how? Will it improve stagnation and the decline in real wages? What are they for?
Any idea?
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Ryan C: “Right wing ideology is entirely based on lies appealing to the worst instincts of human beings (selfishness, tribalism, authroitarian)”
Projection. Left wing lies, hysterics, and ad hominem attacks won’t save the Democratic Party from massive losses in November.
If Americans truly thought left wing ideology was all that compelling, Air America wouldn’t have gone bankrupt. TWICE.
Posted by: Mary | August 3, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
“If Americans truly thought left wing ideology was all that compelling, Air America wouldn’t have gone bankrupt. TWICE.”
Pro wrestling is a regularly a ratings bonanza.
I guess that makes it the height of our culture just as ratings make right wing the ideal for politics, right?
Meanwhile two of the most popular pieces of legislation are MediCare and Social Security.
So popular are these entitlement programs that Republicans tried to position themselves as defenders of any cuts to those programs even after decades of howling and trying to dismantle them.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“We need to vote for True Conservatives.
If we would have done that we wouldn’t be in the mess we are in right now.”
That’s the thing about right wingers and purity tests, the field grows ever narrower.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
A little new item for right wingers since every online right wing media outfit is seems to be avoiding it like the plague.
“We needed to have the press be our friend,” Angle said to a stunned Carl Cameron, who responded: “Wait a minute. Hold on a second. To be your friend?”
“That sounds naïve,” said Cameron, Fox’s lead campaign reporter.
“Well, no,” Angle responded. “We wanted them to ask the questions we want to answer so that they report the news the way we want it to be reported.”
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
TO conservatives or con artists?
You wrote: “What austerity measures will Republicans put in place? What will they do to create jobs? What is their agenda? Will they reduce the deficit? If so, how? Will it improve stagnation and the decline in real wages? What are they for?”
Austerity/Cost Savings/Reduce Deficit
1. Repeal Obamacare – save $1T over 10 years
2. Repeal remaining stimulus – save $400B this year.
Create Jobs
1. Keep tax rates low
2. Eliminate the new regulations and taxes on businesses brought on by financial reform bill and Obamacare.
//The threat of increased taxes and the uncertainty brought about by all of the new regulations is killing business investment.//
Agenda
1. Less government
2. Strong national defense/security leading to improved foreign policy
3. Obey the Constitution
Posted by: RMB | August 3, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
“Austerity/Cost Savings/Reduce Deficit
1. Repeal Obamacare – save $1T over 10 years”
CBO says Obamacare REDUCES the budget deficit $124B over 10 years.
“2. Repeal remaining stimulus – save $400B this year”
A large chunk of the remaining stimulus are payroll tax cuts that are set to expire in 2012.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
“Betting on amnesia?”-no, I’m betting on magnesia..as in “milk of”. Just thinking of the political posturing and pandering that we will suffer through in the next months..heaven help us…I sware I’m still hung over from the last election.
Posted by: cindy | August 3, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Posted by: RMB | Aug 3, 2010 3:12:05 PM
So go back to the Bush policies by repealing anything that has changed, basically?
You agree with the president, then, when he says, ” “They have not come up with a single, solitary new idea to address the challenges of the American people. They don’t have a single idea that’s different from George Bush’s ideas, not one. Instead, they’re betting on amnesia.”
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
1. Repeal Obamacare – save $1T over 10 years”
CBO says Obamacare REDUCES the budget deficit $124B over 10 years.
—//
And never mind what to do about medicare, the uninsured, or escalating costs. Just go back to how it was under Bush, and it’ll all be magically different somehow, some way *this* time.
Posted by: conservatives or con artists? | August 3, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
I’m so glad the left wing is out in full force, spewing the same rethoric, because they have nothing new, same old story, we’re good the others are bad, unemployment is improving, soon everyone will have a job, the stimulus is working, Pres.Obama smiles and walks on water, there are no wars and everyone is happy and money grows on trees.
Posted by: Lizzie | August 3, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
…you would almost think that the upcoming contests are actually a referendum on the POTUS.. it’s like almost a ‘for or against’ vote for the administration..
Posted by: Dontget818 | August 3, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“Pres.Obama smiles and walks on water, there are no wars and everyone is happy and money grows on trees.”
And here boys and girls, we have an example of a straw man.
So when are the Republicans going to offer any specific policies?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Ryan.. the voters are going to the polls, not the talking heads.. there is no need for substance or hard facts.. they choose candidates as if they were picking through the value menu..
Posted by: Dontget818 | August 3, 2010, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“CBO says Obamacare REDUCES the budget deficit $124B over 10 years.”
Someone care to refresh the memories of our amnesia-plagued friends on how the CBO process was gamed?
Just this week, Ichabod Sebelius was STILL double-counting the alleged medicare savings.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I’m so glad the left wing is out in full force, spewing the same rethoric, because they have nothing new, same old story, we’re good the others are bad, unemployment is improving, soon everyone will have a job, the stimulus is working, Pres.Obama smiles and walks on water, there are no wars and everyone is happy and money grows on trees.
Posted by: Lizzie |
Barry thinks if his car is in D then he is going in the right direction. He is apparently not familiar with the purpose of the steering wheel.
Barry is John Candy in Planes, Trains and Automobiles.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“Ryan.. the voters are going to the polls, not the talking heads.. there is no need for substance or hard facts.. they choose candidates as if they were picking through the value menu..”
Posted by: Dontget818 | Aug 3, 2010 4:08:41 PM
Finally, a decent explanation of the Palin enthusiasts.
Posted by: Paige | August 3, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“Someone care to refresh the memories of our amnesia-plagued friends on how the CBO process was gamed”
Awwww someone’s mad that the right wing spin of the CBO report did not catch on.
After all, the right wing has been comfortable offering numbers without context if not outright misleading.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Ryan C wrote:”“Well, no,” Angle responded. “We wanted them to ask the questions we want to answer so that they report the news the way we want it to be reported.”
.
Who is her communication strategist… Anita Dunn? What are oBama & Axlefraud doing letting her work for someone else?
Posted by: gk | August 3, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
“Who is her communication strategist”
Apparently she just hired one today.
Hopefully he does not schedule a press conference only to have his candidate run away (literally) from any questions.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 3, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Like Obama?
Posted by: Nephron | August 3, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Obama’s strategy… legalize weed! People will be too apathetic or not even remember to vote!
Posted by: CBA | August 3, 2010, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Ryan C: “CBO says Obamacare REDUCES the budget deficit $124B over 10 years.”
On May 11th the CBO released a revised estimate of costs for the health care reform law. CBO’s projection is now $115 billion higher than its previous estimates, bringing the estimated cost of the overhaul to over $1 trillion.
Posted by: Mary | August 3, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Ryan C: “Meanwhile two of the most popular pieces of legislation are MediCare and Social Security.”
All forms of welfare are also popular. Illegal aliens find free healthcare popular. Refundable tax credits (transfer payments) are also popular with people who don’t pay taxes. Everybody loves freebies!
But, you see, someone has to fund these popular programs.
Medicare and Social Security are essentially broke, with a combined $110 TRILLION in unfunded mandates. Medicare Part D (prescription drug program) has unfunded mandates of over $19 TRILLION and it’s only FOUR YEARS OLD. These programs continue to exist only because the government is running a gigantic Ponzi scheme. If Medicare or Social Security were managed by a private company, it would have gone out of business many years ago (and its executives would have been imprisoned Bernie Madoff style). There is no possible way these programs can be sustained without significant tax increases and benefit cuts. Congress is actively discussing this right now.
I did a Social Security analysis for a client a few months ago. When I took her and her company’s SS contributions over her working life, I could have invested that money in conservative investments and produced $60,000 per year indefinitely starting at age 65 until her death. At that point, she would still have $1.3 million to leave to her heirs. SS has promised her $24,000 per year starting at age 67 until her death with nothing after that. Popular or not, SS has dramatically degraded her retirement lifestyle and her wealth options.
Posted by: Mary | August 3, 2010, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
“I could have invested that money in conservative investments and produced $60,000 per year indefinitely starting at age 65 until her death”
But once again, you can’t guarantee that…because when you say “conservative” you’re implying lower risk I think, but there is still risk involved. Despite the problems with SS, the whole idea of a social safety net is not to maximize everybody’s investments, but to guarantee a certain return. Guarantees are expensive. If somebody where to invest as you advise but lost significantly what happens to them then? Any financial backup system in this case would be redundant.
Posted by: Skip | August 3, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Skip wrote:”But once again, you can’t guarantee that…because when you say “conservative” you’re implying lower risk I think, but there is still risk involved.”
.
There is no greater risk than being at the tail end of a Ponzi scheme. Thats where we find ourselves today. What is YOUR guaranteed return from here on out? Conservative or higher and higher risk? Who is going to pay YOUR return… cause the CAPITAL is all gone.
Posted by: gk | August 3, 2010, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Where is the humanity? Immigrants here who are undocumented are working for slave wage. I won’t explain how, but I witnessed employers ripping them off in pay, knowing they were at the employers mercy. I have even witnessed it with Legal immigrants who still feel the pressure of the anti immigrant sentiment in this country. I, being American, was a lowly young employee at the time so I couldn’t exactly “speak my mind” to the boss. I learned a lot! Mainly I learned immigrants, with or without papers work hard! Yet they are constantly abused by business. We, as a society benefit from the jobs they are willing to do. The least we could do is patch them up when they come into the emergency room because it is IN FACT, the only health care they receive!
All these people claiming they are getting welfare and stuff don’t know what they are talking about. An American child may receive welfare, which is not enough to sustain a family.
Posted by: irma | August 3, 2010, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
wait wait gk….you answer my question first. What happens if somebody invests sensibly all their life like a good little Republican but still loses their retirement funds? The way right-wingers like to blame the poor for being poor in all cases I don’t think unless you can answer that question you’re ever going to get anywhere near dismantling Social Security, so you might as well start helping everybody in trying to figure out a way to make it work. Especially if you only have the stock exchange to offer as an alternative.
Posted by: Skip | August 3, 2010, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
What happens if somebody invests sensibly all their life like a good little Republican but still loses their retirement funds?
Posted by: Skip |
Are you suggesting that we can’t privatize SS because somebody might make bad investments?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 3, 2010, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Yes, to me that’s one of the reasons. Without arguing about whether SS successfully fills that role or not, a good social safety net should be really safe. Private companies are going to be willing to take risks with those funds. -but you know me foggy…I’m always going to pick the government over big business when it comes to choosing who I think will operate in the public’s best interests. Besides private firms are going to exact a fee for their profits so why will it save us any money?
Posted by: Skip | August 4, 2010, 12:01 am 12:01 am
I’m always going to pick the government over big business when it comes to choosing who I think will operate in the public’s best interests.
Posted by: Skip |
Yes I know and it baffles me for a myriad of reasons.
Any privatization plan would include some incredibly safe and virtually fee-free investments. Treasury Bills for instance. The only entity that profits from your purchase of a T-bill is the gov’t. Your favorite. So why not?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 4, 2010, 12:45 am 12:45 am
While it can be said that the Social Security system is in need of another overhaul and that that the recession has hurt it, the fund is hardly going broke or essentially broke. This is a false alarm that has been debunked countless times, and those who ring it are typically the ones who would like to privatize social security completely or believe alarmist right wing talking points without further analysis or fact checking. Fixing social security is a political problem rather than a financial one. As it stands, the current program can pay out all scheduled benefits for the next 25 or 26 years with no changes whatsoever, and after 2037, it’ll still be able to pay out 75% of scheduled benefits without any tweaks.
Posted by: Cara | August 4, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Cara,
The SS system is not at all solvent because it gets its funds from our Treasury in the form of IOUs. The Treasury is borrowing money from investors to pay out the IOUs and simply adding more money to our national debt. If a corporation tried to say theib business was solvent based on a ruse like this, the CEO and CFO would go to jail.
Posted by: RMB | August 4, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
While it can be said that the Social Security system is in need of another overhaul and that that the recession has hurt it, the fund is hardly going broke or essentially broke…
Posted by: Cara |
There is no fund.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 4, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
The reason so many people believe Social Security is broke is because George W. Bush and Republicans told them so repeatedly during the war over his proposal to privatize it. Its more solvent than most Americans think, particularly those who advocate voting to put Republicans with Bush’s exact same agenda back into office. I urge everyone to check it out for themselves– look into the actual problems, rather than magnifying and distorting what they are.
Posted by: Cara | August 4, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Aug 4, 2010 10:55:46 AM
Btw, its National Clown Week.
Posted by: Cara | August 4, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Btw, its National Clown Week.
Posted by: Cara |
lock box
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 4, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Cara,
When Social Security runs in the red in a few years, and has to cash in all of those Treasury bills and notes so that it can have enough money to pay out what it owes, where do you think that money comes from? It comes from the federal government who will have to try to borrow it from somewhere else, raise taxes, or cut other spending.
Social Security is just another part of the government. Sure, it looks fine on paper, but it lent money to the federal government and when those IOUs come due, the rest of the government has to pay the piper.
Posted by: DaveInMN | August 4, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
in a few years
—
In how many years? A few? Define a “few” for you. I’m not sure where you’re getting your inaccurate information but the fact remains that the current program can pay out all scheduled benefits for the next 25 or 26 years with no changes whatsoever, and after 2037, it’ll still be able to pay out 75% of scheduled benefits — and that is without any tweaks. Polls suggest that most Americans support the small increase necessary in taxes to fixi that. If you’re talking insolvency, you’re talking about the 2040′s at the earliest if you’re remotely honest. There’s no question tweaks are needed but you’re lying as are all those who claim Social Security is “broke.”
Read EPI’s Fact Check: Has Social Security begun tapping its trust funds? (EPI has taken exception to the popular notion that Social Security is going broke and point out that CBO has reported the trust fund for Social Security is actually still growing. It projects the fund to increase from $2.5 trillion this year to $3.8 trillion by 2020.)
Posted by: Cara | August 4, 2010, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Actually, a report a while ago said it would be in the red in a few years. You can look it up, Cara. You’re so smart, I’m sure you’ll find it before I can.
Yes, Social Security is just fine. It’s the federal government that has to pay its IOUs that’s in trouble.
Posted by: DaveMN | August 4, 2010, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Posted by: DaveMN | Aug 4, 2010 7:12:12 PM
Again, define a few, or provide a source. And when you mention a report, are you claiming you have actually read the annual social security report due 4/1 2010 that was postponed, probably until the end of the fiscal year? If so, please tell me where you found it. Tell us all. That would be a pretty great scoop.
The program’s cash flow being temporarily in the red (due to the fact that payroll tax revenues have declined because of the recession) is much different than the program going broke or being in the red overall.
I suggest everyone read the information at EPI, and like I said, you can start with “Has Social Security begun tapping its trust funds?” Then you can follow that up with “Social Security is sustainable”
As I mentioned earlier, CBO has reported the trust fund for Social Security is actually still growing. It projects the fund to increase from $2.5 trillion this year to $3.8 trillion by 2020.”
Posted by: Cara | August 4, 2010, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Cara wrote:”Again, define a few, or provide a source. And when you mention a report, are you claiming you have actually read the annual social security report due 4/1 2010 that was postponed, probably until the end of the fiscal year? If so, please tell me where you found it. Tell us all. That would be a pretty great scoop.”
.
How about taking a BASIC ECONOMICS course and you would be able to figure this out for yourself instead of pestering everyone else to “explain” it or “source” it. There is no Social Security trust fund…. the money is gone! spent! ADIOS! and what is left is an IOU payable by ME, the dwindling productive taxpayer.
What Congress has done would be no different than you writing a check to yourself for a million dollars, but not cashing it. You walk around with a million bucks in your pocket bragging to everyone, but what happens when you decide to cash it in. WHERE DOES THAT MONEY COME FROM? SOMEONE has to pay for that IOU. Bernie Madoff is in jail as we speak because he ran his own little scam based on the Social Security model. It did not work out too well for him… did it.
Posted by: gk | August 4, 2010, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
gk, So Reagan’s efforts in 1983 were all just part of a Ponzi scheme? He’s just another Madoff? And the budget is unified, more or less; social security isn’t separate? We’re completely broke and can’t fund anything, including war? There’s just no money at all? We’re done? Treasury doesn’t honor its bonds anymore?
Or, are you pulling my leg and repeating zombie lies about social security which have been in vogue (despite being debunked) among right wingers for years now?
Posted by: Cara | August 5, 2010, 3:29 am 3:29 am
Cara: you are obviously so blinded by ignorant left-wing spin that you can’t see the forest for the trees.
.
“So Reagan’s efforts in 1983 were all just part of a Ponzi scheme? He’s just another Madoff?”
.
What did Reagan do that was different than any other president? And what specifically are you referring to anyways other than all the lefties absolutely hated Reagan. I guess you are all mad at the way he took on Communism… your brethren.
.
” And the budget is unified, more or less; social security isn’t separate? ”
.
Are there any tangible assets in the social security fund? Gold? Land? Dutch Tulips? Anything other than a paper IOU redeemable by ME the taxpayer?
.
“We’re completely broke and can’t fund anything, including war? There’s just no money at all? We’re done? ”
.
If your personal household had an income of $100K a year but you’ve got $2 Million in debt because you lived high on the hog over the year, and your interest payments on that debt are fast approaching your $100K yearly income, what would you call it.
.
“Treasury doesn’t honor its bonds anymore?”
.
As long as they can continue to rob more and more tax money from the fewer and fewer remaining productive taxpayers they can honor those bonds. But, those of us carrying all the load are getting mighty damn tired of the increasing freeloaders. Something is going to change soon.
Posted by: gk | August 5, 2010, 8:30 am 8:30 am
What did Reagan do that was different than any other president?
—-
What did he do? Obviously, what he did do in regards to social security was worthless, right? According to you? In 1983, he signed into law the reforms endorsed by the Greenspan Commission that created the large and growing trust funds. He said, “This Bill demonstrates for all time our nation’s ironclad commitment to Social Security.…It assures those who are still working that they, too, have a pact with the future. From this day forward, they have our pledge that they will get their fair share of benefits when they retire.”
And that wasn’t a trust fund in your mind because of the assets, right? It was a Ponzi scheme. Was Reagan being willfully deceptive, like Madoff?
(Btw, talking about my brethren in a nonsensical fashion is besides the point, and has nothing to do with the discussion. It just highlights that you’re not familiar with the issue you’re attempting to discuss)
Perhaps, as an afterthought, you’re the one who needs a few courses? History, logic,economics, etc. Or maybe you could list out a few sources for your distortions and we could give you more credible sources?
For the record, U.S. Treasury obligations are viewed worldwide to be an extremely safe investment, still. The federal government throughout its long history, including deep recessions and times of war, has always paid interest and principal on its debt.
Certainly, there are issues related to social security to discuss, but zombie lies are zombie lies and you’re repeating them.
Posted by: Cara | August 5, 2010, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Personally – R is looking good right now. I remember the “are you better off now than you were 4 years ago”? I’ll take the 4 years ago.
Posted by: Cathy B | August 5, 2010, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Cara,
The Washington Times has an article JUST TODAY that disproves what you so emphatically wrote yesterday about SS being totally rock solid.
You just keep relying on the government for your retirement. The rest of us will save our money. That way, when the feds decide to cut benefits (which the Supreme Court says they can do, since you have no legal right to the money you put into the system), we’ll be just fine.
Posted by: DaveMN | August 5, 2010, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
The Washington Times has an article JUST TODAY that disproves what you so emphatically wrote yesterday about SS being totally rock solid.
—-
Better to go straight to the reports released JUST TODAY and draw your own conclusions, or read a wide range of the stories out JUST TODAY (because of that release) so you actually have some clue what you’re talking about.
Read primary sources, think for yourself, don’t limit yourself to a right wing bubble, and babble.
Sample headlines: “Social Security and Medicare still face serious financial challenges, annual review says, But the new healthcare law may provide added stability to the two massive programs, which could stay in the black until 2029 and 2037;”"Medicare Gets New Lease On Life; Social Security Remains Healthy”
The report backs me up, actually, as do most credible news reports on the subject.
Posted by: Cara | August 5, 2010, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
So you read that “Social Security still faces serious financial challenges” as “there’s no problem with Social Security and Republicans are overblowing it.” You’re a genius.
Posted by: DaveMN | August 5, 2010, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Dave, how funny how you try turn this around. I urge people to read the threads and the annual report. Fact check both Dave and I.
Please.
The zombies and the zombie lies are truly outrageous.
For example, I never said that there were no problems whatsover with social security. Quote me, if you can. Oh, you can’t ? How shocking (not.) What I actually said is “While it can be said that the Social Security system is in need of another overhaul and that that the recession has hurt it, the fund is hardly going broke or essentially broke. This is a false alarm that has been debunked countless times, and those who ring it are typically the ones who would like to privatize social security completely or believe alarmist right wing talking points without further analysis or fact checking. … As it stands, the current program can pay out all scheduled benefits for the next 25 or 26 years with no changes whatsoever, and after 2037, it’ll still be able to pay out 75% of scheduled benefits without any tweaks. ”
Where you actually get something right is I do think Republicans lie. Just look at your lie about my posts.
“Just genius”, Dave. Really super genius.
Not.
Lies, and more lies.
Posted by: Cara | August 6, 2010, 1:16 am 1:16 am
And once again, you fail to even acknowledge my main point which is this: what SS has on paper is meaningless. The treasurey has to pay those IOUs once SS starts running in the red, which it just did this year. That means that instead of having money to lend to the federal government this year, now the SS is calling in some of those IOUs. Where does the federal government get that money? They get it by raising taxes or borrowing even more. THAT is what I was talking about, but you keep ignoring it and just focusing on social security.
SS is not some separate pool. There is no lockbox. Congress made it so that the only thing the SS fund could invest its money in was U.S. treasuries. Great. This just means that when SS is in the red, as it is this year, money can’t be spent until the federal government repays the loan.
If you can’t understand that, I don’t know what else I can say to get it through your head.
Posted by: DaveMN | August 6, 2010, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Dave, When I post something you don’t like or disagree with, you come back with cliches like “You just keep relying on the government for your retirement. The rest of us will save our money” (as if you know what my investments are… and as if pointing out zombie lies on social security means I have no savings or a wide range of investments ). You also distort and misstate what I’ve posted, refuse to define a few, cite sources or get very specific.
Now all of that is expected and cliche from a certain type, but the expected and cliches are tiresome, aren’t they?
Perhaps, you feel testy because I haven’t validated you. Instead I’ve pointed that versions of right wing assertions– social security zombie lies– have been debunked a bazillion times (social security will be broke in a “few years” – e.g. see Fact Check: Has Social Security begun tapping its trust funds?) and I’ve urged people to read the annual report themselves and to try to understand social security outside the right wing and social security opposition’s bubble, babble and blather because the public likes social security and supports it and while there are financial challenges, they are manageable outside the political bubble. Imho, social security is a worthwhile program offering basic income guarantees in the event of retirement, disability, or death of the primary breadwinner.
In addition, I have urged people to read a wide range of stories rather than clinging to what they read from one single source, such as the Washington Times. As we’ve seen countless times, our media isn’t all that it could be. Putting your trust in one source and one source only, and not reading widely and deeply is a mistake. I stand by that. You disagree?
While it is true that since payroll tax receipts are down compared to pre-recession estimates, Social Security is projected to run a primary deficit, it is a *primary deficit*, a measure that excludes interest on trust fund assets. Social Security cash flow will head back into the black for a few years after that, and then starting in 2015 it is projected to stay in the red for the long haul IF no tweaks are made. However, that doesn’t make it worthless, essentially broke or bankrupt as right wingers like to claim. Do you disagree?
From another perspective, social security has been rather resilient in the face of the recession.
And what I said about payouts is true. Per the annual report, “the projected point at which the combined Trust Funds will be exhausted comes in 2037 – the same as the estimate in last year’s report. At that time, there will be sufficient tax revenue coming in to pay about 78 percent of benefits.”
Now, to address your point, when you say, “SS is not some separate pool,” do you argue that in all cases that we have a unified budget, or only when its convenient? You’re basically claiming that assigning a particular tax to a particular program is a pretense, a fiction,make-believe (although it does have both legal and political force)in which case, fine, but be consistent with that and admit then social security as a separate entity can’t be broke, it can only be broke or in the red as part of a broke government with a broke military and no funds for endless war.
Anywho…
Given your view, I’d imagine you’d really have to wonder what Reagan was doing when in 1983 he signed into law the reforms endorsed by the Greenspan Commission that created the large and growing trust funds. He said, “This Bill demonstrates for all time our nation’s ironclad commitment to Social Security.…It assures those who are still working that they, too, have a pact with the future. From this day forward, they have our pledge that they will get their fair share of benefits when they retire.”
Was he just a scam artist, in your opinion?
Posted by: Cara | August 6, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Yeah, read both me and Cara. I said Social Security is just fine. But that’s like saying that the California pensioners are just fine. It’s just the rest of the state that’s going to go to he11 when they have to pay those pensions.
Posted by: DaveMN | August 6, 2010, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
‘Betting on amnesia’, I love that line! Truly after all their no’s, their lies about the health care bill, many of them trying to block financial reform, not to mention the mess 8 years of Bush left our economy, our world-standing and our national debt, the Repubs really do need us all to have amnesia.
Posted by: Lydia | August 6, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
The trust fund is all govt bonds. How do they get paid back? Yet again you ignore this. I’m done trying to get through to you.
Posted by: Dave | August 7, 2010, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Dave,
You asked “The trust fund is all govt bonds. How do they get paid back?”
Jeez!!! That’s EASY!!! Barry is fully confident in his #1 strategy for solving ALL issues that confront him… the same strategy he sold his lemmings from the first day of his campaign… he will HOPE them away!!
But I’ll tell you what!! Not being one to sit on his laurels, I’ve heard he’s MORE than prepared to move to Plan B… he’ll even cross his fingers too!!
So, how’s THAT for an answer, smarty pants?!! Beat THAT!
Posted by: Namako | August 8, 2010, 12:51 am 12:51 am
In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. — Voltaire (1764)
And on that note all I can say (since 1764) seemingly – not a lot has changed.
“Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it,” — George Santayana
Posted by: Just ME in T | August 9, 2010, 4:47 am 4:47 am
I am a Democrate that will be voting Republican next election. At least I will get a COLA raise being that I am a Disabled Veteran trying to get Social Secuity Disablilty.
Posted by: Angela Pinkney | August 19, 2010, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm