By Dschabner

Aug 31, 2010 12:01am

Obama Health Secretary: ‘We’ve Got a Lot of Reeducation to Do’

ABC News' Steven Portnoy reports:

As a widely-watched survey shows support for the new health care reform law slipping, the leader in the reform effort says the administration has “a lot of reeducation to do” to reverse the trend.

The poll, from the Kaiser Family Foundation, shows more Americans now oppose the reform law than favor it, 45 percent to 43 percent, reflecting a seven-point drop in support from the organization’s last survey, released in late July. 

Since the law’s passage in late March, the monthly Kaiser survey has been highlighted by backers of health care reform as evidence of increasing support for the measures, as it suggested a slight upward tick in the number of Americans embracing the reforms -– rising as high as 50 percent in last month’s poll.  Now, much of the gains have been erased.

The current survey shows only 39 percent of Americans believe the country will be “better off” under the health care reforms, a new low in this poll.  Slightly more than half of those questioned say they’re disappointed in the new law.

In an ABC News/Washington Post poll taken in July, 50 percent of Americans disapproved of the president’s handling of health care, with 45 percent saying they approved.  Those who disapproved did so more strongly than those who favored the Obama administration’s actions.

In an interview before the latest Kaiser results were released, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told ABC News that the sustained opposition to the Democrats’ health care reform efforts has mainly been a function of “misinformation.”

“Unfortunately there still is a great deal of confusion about what is in [the reform law] and what isn’t,” Sebelius told ABC News Radio on Monday. 

With several vulnerable House Democrats now touting their votes against the bill, and Republicans running on repeal of the law, Sebelius said “misinformation given on a 24/7 basis” has led to the enduring opposition nearly six months after the lengthy debate ended in Congress. 

“We have a lot of reeducation to do,” Sebelius said.

The administration is particularly concerned about the views of senior citizens, who “have been a target of a lot of the misinformation,” according to the health secretary.

As of this week, 1 million seniors have received $250 rebate checks to help them fill the “donut hole” in Medicare’s prescription drug coverage.  Sebelius says by the end of the year, as many as 4 million Part D participants may get checks.

“Once people understand that [the rebate checks are] just one of the new features for Medicare beneficiaries, they become increasingly more enthusiastic,” Sebelius told ABC News.

Kaiser reported last month that among those 65 years and older, 43 percent said in July that Medicare would be “worse off” under the reforms, compared to 25 percent who said the program would be “better off.”

Sebelius says she understands the concerns of American seniors.

“They’re worried about what happens to their benefits in the future, worried about what happens to the overall stability of Medicare.”

The secretary says she “strongly” disagrees with what her immediate predecessor, former Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt, wrote in a Washington Post op-ed last week, suggesting the changes to Medicare in the health care law merely create the “illusion” of reform.

“It does not ease cost pressures but papers over them with unsustainable price controls,” Leavitt wrote.

Sebelius argues the reforms “strengthen” Medicare, extending its solvency by 12 years through 2029.

“My view is actually supported by independent actuaries, by economists and by the Congressional Budget Office,” Sebelius said.

User Comments

Ahh, I just can’t wait to be first in line for the FEMA camp! (NOT!) Obama=Bush 3rd term!!!
So America… Had enough?
Hell with Palin, Hell with Romney, Hell with Hilliary, WHO stands UP for the American people! (No, it aint Glenn Beck either)
He who chooses not to reason is a FOOL, he who dares not reason is a SLAVE!
What more do they have to do to you, before you get the message!?!

Posted by: CBA | August 31, 2010, 12:07 am 12:07 am

soooo what are you suggesting CBA, a third revolution? (civil war was the second)

Posted by: adam | August 31, 2010, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Reeducation… That sounds scarry doesnt it? You mean that after all this time, after all the realization and shock at the overall cost, after all the second thoughts of what have we done. Now there is concern over reeducation? I think they all just had their interns finnish reading it and relay the info. Now the second phase of spin will begin. Our government has done quite enough thank you.

Posted by: ROSAVOLA | August 31, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am

The re-education should start with the government.
The CBO does NOT support the claim that the health care legislation will save money from Medicare.
Moreover, the “doctor fix” which is essential to Medicare and Medicaid was deliberately left out of the legislation.
Why? To make it appear that the legislation would not add to the budget deficit.
But, the “doctor fix” will have to be approved soon, and it will add to the deficit when it’s passed.
The legislation, in principle, is good. In reality, it doesn’t make economic sense.

Posted by: vrytix | August 31, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Someone is going to have to do something with this bill. As a small business owner it is becoming more and more impossible to have or offer health insurance. Last year we raised deductibles so that ew could afford the 28% increase in premiums. Less than one year later we are getting another 28% increase and we have had very little in claims. This has to be controlled somehow, or we will not be able to offer employees healthcare or attract new employees because we can not afford to pay monthly premiums.

Posted by: Phillip Hamiltonp | August 31, 2010, 12:21 am 12:21 am

“As a widely-watched survey shows support for the new health care reform law slipping, the leader in the reform effort says the administration has “a lot of reeducation to do” to reverse the trend.”
Reeducation – the term governments love to use for brainwashing and indoctrination. If the bill hadn’t been 2000+ pages long “reeducation” wouldn’t be necessary…or was obfuscation and information overload that the whole point?

Posted by: Publius | August 31, 2010, 12:23 am 12:23 am

So another slip up again. We all need to get our minds right whether we like it or not. This starts with our children first. When they get old enough, they will round us up to send us to be reeducated. If that doesn’t work, termination. This happens in every communist country. One of Obamas staff had described this scenario to the letter.

Posted by: chino | August 31, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Wow Robert, It appears you’ve already been “re-educated”.

Posted by: I.M.Wright | August 31, 2010, 12:49 am 12:49 am

What I don’t need is a reeducation from some government hack. I am very well educated, thank you. What I do need is the federal government to get their nose out of my business and tend to the responsibilities that have been assigned to them through the constitution.

Posted by: gmark | August 31, 2010, 12:52 am 12:52 am

reeducation?
what kind of newspeak 1984 garbage is that?

Posted by: James | August 31, 2010, 12:55 am 12:55 am

raping medicare to fund free medical care for the uninsured is a total breech of promise for the older people.

Posted by: rotorhead1871 | August 31, 2010, 1:03 am 1:03 am

re-education????
Who said Orwell was wrong?

Posted by: James | August 31, 2010, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Why can’t we have a civil discussion & sharing of ideas, without all the sarcasism and destructive dialogue?

Posted by: Ed | August 31, 2010, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Wow, this site was once one of the most active and intellectually challenging. What happened?

Posted by: bobj72 | August 31, 2010, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Funny most the people against healthcare reform complain about costs but then support tax cuts for the rich. I didn’t know saving millions of lives was a bad thing. I didn’t know costs would be such a hot topic when it came to saving lives of the American people. We can fund a war but not healcare for our citizens? Amazing.

Posted by: Kayla71482 | August 31, 2010, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Re-education? Like in Communist Re-education camps and Obama’s hero Ayers that the FBI testitified that Ayers and friends “I asked, “well what is going to happen to those people we can’t reeducate, that are diehard capitalists?” and the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated.
And when I pursued this further, they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers.
And when I say “eliminate,” I mean “kill.”
Twenty-five million people.
I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people.
And they were dead serious.”

Posted by: IndependentVoice | August 31, 2010, 1:21 am 1:21 am

The republicans will let you die in the dirt. The people who work in health care are going to be short on customers and probably jobs if they depend on just the wealthy. Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Throw republicans out of office instead and lets go for the robust public option. Lets get rid of the phony baloney health care insurance markets and go single payer. No country that has it will give it up.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 31, 2010, 1:27 am 1:27 am

IndpendentVoice, if you believe that – if you really and truly believe that – why do you still live in this country?

Posted by: puppyfeet217 | August 31, 2010, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Can’t wait until November. In reality, there never was any “support” for this bill, and the liars at ABC “News” well know that. Just can’t wait until November.

Posted by: Johncleveland | August 31, 2010, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Show me one single poll where “support” for this bill ever topped fifty percent? You can’t, because there aren’t any. Ruling against the will of the people gets you kicked out of office. Ta! Can’t wait until November! Toodles! Buh bye! Sayonara! Later! Don’t let the doors hit you in the butt on the way out! Vaya con dios! Aloha! You Democrats are going to need a satellite image to get a look at Washington come November.

Posted by: Johncleveland | August 31, 2010, 1:48 am 1:48 am

You Republicans are sick and brainwashed—I HAVE looked into emigrating to another country and without wealth, health and ‘or youth and a great education it is impossible. They do take refugees from some camps in third world countries—but not that many. I would have had a MUCH better life if I had been born in ANY other western country. Go ahead , live in denial—I loathe most of you morons anyway!!!!!

Posted by: Janet Roush | August 31, 2010, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius states: As of this week, 1 million seniors have received $250 rebate checks to help them fill the “donut hole” in Medicare’s prescription drug coverage. Sebelius says by the end of the year, as many as 4 million Part D participants may get checks.
————-
They ‘may’? You mean you don’t know, Ms. Secretary?
Why should I be surprised though? Congress and the administration have said they don’t know what was in the bill when it was passed.

Posted by: malcat | August 31, 2010, 4:14 am 4:14 am

Support is decreasing, because more truth is coming out. All the crap they DIDN’T tell you. In January, your W-2 is going to list the insurance your employer provides for you, as INCOME. Yes, YOU get to pay taxes on that too! God only knows how much other crap they’ve hidden. Yeah, I agree with CBA, it’s past time for politics. The Second Amendment was put there, for exactly this reason. And it’s time to use it.

Posted by: VPutin | August 31, 2010, 5:07 am 5:07 am

We just don’t care anymore. We just don’t care. Do whatever you want, Washington. We’re getting off the grid. We’re crashing your economy. We’re done with your insane demands for 100% taxation on everything we earn (oh yes it’s 100% eventually… watch the numbers and add it up). We’re done. We’re the most productive people you have, but we’re done. You pushed us too hard, too far, for too long. You’re on your own. We’re shutting down the factories, we’re moving jobs overseas, we’re quitting your scheme. And no, we’re not leaving America. We ARE America.

Posted by: You know what | August 31, 2010, 5:16 am 5:16 am

Great choice of photos. “Tongue in Cheek” should have been the caption. And I think I’ll pass on the speechifying from the Oval Orifice in the Waffle House. How many days until Novemer 2…?

Posted by: Sharon | August 31, 2010, 5:17 am 5:17 am

well the wealthly cant stand anyone else getting something they need!

Posted by: me | August 31, 2010, 5:19 am 5:19 am

Isn’t reeducation what the Russians called it when they sent you to a golag ?

Posted by: hkdakota | August 31, 2010, 5:58 am 5:58 am

What bugs me is the assertion that the administration needs to ‘reeducate’ American citizens. Heck, I don’t even like the assertion they think they educated us the first time.
No, Ms. Secretary, you have a lot of explaining to do. You need to explain to American citizens what was in that monstrosity…with no justifications, no confusion, no self-serving statements of wonderful, wonderful ‘us’.
What will it do for us, what will it do against us? How much will it REALLY cost in tax dollars and out-of-pocket direct costs for the healthcare user?
What new taxes or ‘fees’ are going to be needed to pay for it?
This administration and Congress need to explain to their bosses just what the heck did you REALLY do about reforming health care vs forcing everyone to buy health insurance.

Posted by: malcat | August 31, 2010, 5:59 am 5:59 am

Re-Education, huh? They finally showed their true hand and came out and flatly used the term, “re-education”. Kinda like the “re-education” camps in North Viet Nam. For those “lost souls” who were foolish enough to fight for freedom, but who were then welcomed back into the fold after the war. Of course, they had to do their stint at the “re-education” camps. Their children were taken from them (of course for their own good, and they were pretty much relegated to menial careers afterwards) Following the intense brainwashing, they were reportedly converted to ‘good citizens’.

Posted by: ncpilot10 | August 31, 2010, 6:00 am 6:00 am

mal2cats….”ms secretary” CAN’T tell you what’s in the bill. She has no idea. Even the author of the bill stated, day before yesterday, “Of course I didn’t read it. We hire experts for that. It’s full of legalese, and I don’t have time to read that, nor would I understand it.” But they’ll ‘re-educate’ US

Posted by: ncpilot10 | August 31, 2010, 6:02 am 6:02 am

Dollar to a doughnut, by the end of this day, obama will come out to the microphone and announce that ms secretary was “misquoted”, that what she meant was that she supports the constitutional right for “re-educating” the American Citizens, but she did not and will not comment on the wisdom of doing it”.

Posted by: ncpilot10 | August 31, 2010, 6:05 am 6:05 am

I know that, ncpilot, unfortunately it’s hard to ‘type’ tone of voice.

Posted by: malcat | August 31, 2010, 6:05 am 6:05 am

Re-education? Maybe they have ‘camps’ for things like that. Seriously I don’t need a bunch of government bureaucrats telling me what’s good for me and where my interests lie.

Posted by: BDT | August 31, 2010, 6:20 am 6:20 am

Getting closer…now you may come to realize why it’s so important that Americans retain their right to own firearms. It is the only thing that the individual politician still fears from the citizenry.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2010, 6:35 am 6:35 am

@ Johncleveland: You say “ruling against the will of the people gets you kicked out of office…” but the problem is the alternative is the GOP, and the polls show they have an even lower poll rating than the Dems.

Posted by: The_Mick | August 31, 2010, 6:38 am 6:38 am

I support Health CARE Reform, which to me shouldn’t be just an attack on Health Insurance cos. as some kind of scapegoat. The government wants to tax the so-called Cadillac plans, so that people will settle for whittled down plans, where they can pay more out of pocket, for already over-priced care. The other answers is cutting down on what may be necessary tests, without questioning why an MRI costs as much as a new car. There are a lot of greedy hands in the health care industry, from the Medical suppliers, to the Pharmaceutical cos. the doctors, etc. along WITH the insurance cos. The other half of the problem is the consumers, with their self-will, in this I’ll do what I want society, running up the bill for everyone. I SUPPORT TOTAL HEALTH CARE REFORM–LOOKING AT EVERYONES PART.

Posted by: parma hts gary | August 31, 2010, 6:59 am 6:59 am

malcat……no problem. You always get your point across, even without being able to “type” tone of voice. And, typically, you do it with grace and politeness. (perhaps I could take a lesson from you…..but I sort of enjoy tweaking a few liberal noses every now and then). But I betcha that this story will either be taken off the board (or relegated to the back ‘pages’ of it) or, as I stated, Sebelius’ statement will be “clarified” once the white house staff realizes how offensive the term “re-education” is.

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 7:02 am 7:02 am

The_mick…….what polls are you talking about?? Honestly, I’d love for you to cite one single poll that shows the GOP has a lower rating than the Democratic party. No arguing, no fussing, no calling you any bad names. But you are so incorrect that it’s laughable because on the headlines of all of the news stations today is, “for the first time, the GOP rating exceeds 10% ABOVE the rating of the Democratic party. 51% to 41%” If you do not believe me, go to the Gallup Poll website. Of course, I expect that rather than admit you are wrong, you will take the typical liberal come-back of, “What do polls know anyway?” Or, “Poll takers (even Gallup) know nothing (especially when their data flies in the face of what I think)”…….please, go take a look. And look at “realclearpolitics” And Rasmussen. AP Polls. You will not find a single poll that shows that American voters hold the GOP in lower esteem than the Democratic party. You willing to take that challenge? If so, you big enough to come back and admit you are wrong?

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 7:10 am 7:10 am

honestly, their not even trying to hide it anymore. “reeducation”, who’s in charge now, the khmer rouge?

Posted by: davidfrat21 | August 31, 2010, 7:10 am 7:10 am

oops…”they’re” not “their”…need more coffee.

Posted by: davidfrat21 | August 31, 2010, 7:11 am 7:11 am

ncpilot, I quite agree that there will be some corrections to her comments.
Using the terms re-educate and misinformation together when talking about legislation was a big no-no.
She definitely ‘mis-spoke’ even if she really meant what she said. And that’s what upsets me….I have a nasty feeling that is exactly what she meant.

Posted by: malcat | August 31, 2010, 7:14 am 7:14 am

Good idea, davidfrat. I’ve been up since 2:30…I need more coffee.

Posted by: malcat | August 31, 2010, 7:18 am 7:18 am

I love this country. I love it for what it was and for what it could still be. People (myself included) need to stop venting their anger and frustration on websites that no one will see and start exercising their right to assembly. The only way that the “leadership” in Washington will start to listen is the old-fashioned way: take it to the streets. Going to the polls won’t help, since a professional politicians are all alike and NONE of them care about “the American people” that they speak about quite frequently. It’s time to take our country back.

Posted by: Chris | August 31, 2010, 7:28 am 7:28 am

malcat……i’m afraid that that is exactly what she meant also. I’m starting to feel that the term is just part of the vernacular of the obama camp. The word is probably bantered about so non-chalantly in their everyday speech that it sorta just slipped out when she was speaking in public.

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 7:34 am 7:34 am

The gullibility of the electorate is why the Founders included the Electoral College in Article Two of the Constitution. It’s also why Americans are so misinformed — manipulated by special interests. It’s a wonder that progressives can make any progress at all.

Posted by: Kent | August 31, 2010, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Secretary Sebelius should be educating Congress. In order for her savings to occur and the Medicare Trust Fund have its life extended 12 years; members of Congress must vote in December to cut physician reimbursement for Medicare patients by 23%. Then they must cut another 6% in January. Doctors are already at or below breakeven when providing care to Medicare patients, now they are going to have to absorb another 30% pay cut. If this doesn’t happen then Ms. Sebelius should come under fire for not being completely honest with the general public.

Posted by: Patrick | August 31, 2010, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Oh, come on….why would you want to throw out a term like “gullibility” when referring to the electorate that happens to disagree with your viewpoints? And then make a lame attempt to legitamize your term by linking some other fact to it, such as stating that THAT is the reason for the electorate college. That shows YOUR gullibility in believing whatever you read in your talking point websites that you visit. The electorate college had absolutely NOTHING to do with the “gullibility” of anyone. The Electorate College was created because of the difficulty of travel back in the late 1700′s and 1800′s. The Constitutional Convention deemed that instead of a group (them) meeting behind closed doors to elect a president, a group of people (later called the Electorate College) would be selected (proportionally to the number of representative that each state would have)…and those representatives would vote the wish of their states’ citizens. Not a thing to gullibility. Your attempt at an insult is insulting

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 7:48 am 7:48 am

There is a degree of voter distrust of the voters in the history of the electorate college……but not because of niaivity or gullibilty…more from ignorance. And I don’t mean ignorance in a derogatory sense. There was no TV, no mass media….so a lot of the problems of the day were not “public knowledge”……so the electorate college acts as a buffer between the voters and the president.

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Wow! Look at all this right-wing anarchy.
Right-wingers have been in control of this society almost unabated since January 20, 1969. But not one of them can figure out it is their own people, their pride, their joy, their role models who have trashed this country so badly.
Reagan – 2 recessions, 12% unemployment
Bush I – 1 recession
Gingrich’s Contract On America – 1 recession, 1 internet bubble, 1 housing bubble, 1 banking melt-down, birth of rabid-right unaccountable propaganda media
Bush II – 2 wars, 1 depression, 15 million unemployed

Posted by: NovaB | August 31, 2010, 7:57 am 7:57 am

WOW! Look at NovaB,the obama apologist, attempting to minimize and excuse obama’s failures by pointing out his perceived short-comings of past presidents or leaders. obama is the president now. 19 months of him and his clowns have caused the recession to get worse, have delayed the recovery, and has crippled small business, the backbone of our economy. But he has managed to pump money to his special interest supporters like his homies in Chicago and his Union Thugs supporters. He’s managed to meet with important people like Paul McCartney and the various NBA teams. He has rubbed elbows with the Hollywood elite, and he has managed to blame all of his failures on his “inherited” mess. I suppose in the future, as you desperately try to rationalize your position of today in the future, you will omit obama’s failures just as you omit Carter’s, Clinton’s, and Johnson………It’s old hat and very boring now…..obama is the president

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 8:09 am 8:09 am

The only reason why Americans oppose the healthcare reform is that they have to buy into it. ok – understandable in a lousy economy. Look – change the law to allow them to opt out or buy in at a very low cost. We don’t have to force this stuff down people’s throats. Give them their freedom and they’ll be ok with it. Then the GOP won’t have any leverage in their attempted repeal.

Posted by: Bob | August 31, 2010, 8:13 am 8:13 am

Bob, why do you think that having to buy into the HCR is the ONLY reason that Americans oppose it? That just is not a correct assumption. I, for one..along with 56% of the population, oppose it because it is too costly to the NATION, not to me. It was hammered together behind closed doors, and passed ONLY through intimidation, coercion, and bribery. A good bill would not have required illegal actions to get passed. The author of the bill, just the day before yesterday, admitted that he had not read the bill. The quality of care is bound to decrease….and for those who may think that this bill will give ‘equal access’ to healthcare, i’d suggest that they simply look at countries that do have socialized medicine. Do you think that the ‘elite’…the politicians, the hollywood stars, and athletes…do you honestly believe that if you get a disease exactly the same as, say, Brad Pitt gets….do you really think that you will receive the same degree of care and treatment, the same quality of hospital, and the same highly educated specialist that Mr. Pitt will get? Do ya really???

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 8:30 am 8:30 am

The people who want to repeal the health insurance reform tend to enhance the more scary parts of the bill with misinformation and inuendo and suggesting opinion as being fact. 90% of the insurance reform bill is being ignored.
Perhaps these anti-insurance reform people want to get the thing repealed before it the people have had a chance to see what it’s really all about.
A campaign of fear should always be taken with great skeptacism.

Posted by: Wayne | August 31, 2010, 8:32 am 8:32 am

I had a SCUBA diving accident in Grand Cayman several years ago. I was taken to the local hospital…..where I received pretty good care. The cost was minimal. But the hospital was pretty shabby (from lack of funding), not what I was used to. I’m not complaining…they did a great job. But it was the “common-man’s” hospital. The politicians had a newer facility.

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 8:34 am 8:34 am

How can you say ‘misinformation’…when the whole bill was passed without a single congressman reading it? What information are we misinformed about? I’d love for you to tell me what misinformation or scare tactic you are so skeptical about

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

it just flabbergasts me when liberals (or conservatives, for that matter) come in and make a statement like that: “The people who want to repeal the health insurance reform tend to enhance the more scary parts of the bill with misinformation and inuendo and suggesting opinion as being fact. 90% of the insurance reform bill is being ignored.” You really think that sounds intelligent in insightful? Of course it has some good things in it…..but why in the world would anyone cite the good things as a reason to want the bill overthrown? That would be like telling the judge all the good things about your spouse when you are asking for a divorce.

Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 31, 2010, 8:43 am 8:43 am

The American people keep demanding REPRESENTATION…from an administration obsessed with our REEDUCATION.

Posted by: cindy | August 31, 2010, 8:43 am 8:43 am

“We have a lot of reeducation to do,” Sebelius said.
And here comes the enema, flushing out what you really know with more Government BS.

Posted by: david | August 31, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am

This article also demonstrates the leftist media’s own blindness. Seven ABC employees including Steven Portnoy apparently contributed to this story. Beyond framing “reeducation” in quotation marks, that’s about the only indication we have of any questioning by these journalists of Sebelius’s underlying premise: it’s not that the bill is a budget busting, freedom infringing, care worsening monstrosity, it’s that too many Americans are just too poorly informed about the bill’s many glories after months and months and months of incessant pro-bill propaganda by the administration and the media.

Posted by: Erik | August 31, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Reeducation? Are you kidding? That smacks of Communisim and Socialism. This is a free country and my first and second ammendment rights are going to keep it that way. The Obama Administration is who needs reeducation; and that my friends will come in November. Even, whatever October suprise Obama drums up or real world action like Isreal taking out Iran’s Nuclear plant, will not stop the Conservitive uprising!

Posted by: Larry Nathanson | August 31, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

So who is going to pay to send us all to re-education camp? I suggest we outsource the task to North Korea.

Posted by: Robert | September 1, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

We need to get education (politics)
out of the fed. gov. and return to
county government and parents.
Bring back the America we knew.
NO more spending on or breeding of
‘special interest groups’.
Lessen power of fed gov.

Posted by: Jack Kinch(1uncle) | September 1, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

How long is it going to take for the cool-aid drinkers to see that the 60′s crowd that invaded this white house hated this country in the 60′s and they still hate it now. Most of these poor little rich kids were worthless then and bit the very hand that fed them. They are still worthless but dangerous. We need to clean them all out of this govt and ban them from any college campus so they can’t continue to brainwash our next generation.

Posted by: Bob | September 4, 2010, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Re-educate us on health care?
It is all right to cut seniors treatments, after all we are running out of social security because we are giving it to illegal aliens, and this may cause seniors not to live as long, which will help with social security payments.
If a person, any person no matter what age, has a 50-50 chance of survival, just give them pain medications. They more than likely will not make it anyway. Why waste money on treatments.

Posted by: Denny | September 4, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.