Axelrod to US Chamber: What Are You Hiding That You Don’t Want the American People to See?
We caught up with White House senior adviser David Axelrod today to chat about the current controversy about the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and whether any of its ads are being funded with foreign money.
TAPPER: So the chamber says no foreign money is paying for any of their political activities.
AXELROD: And I guess my answer to the Chamber is just disclose where your money is coming from and that will end all the questions. The fact is they are spending $75 million in this campaign and they will not disclose where one dime is coming from. And that's the problem with all of these organizations. We have tens of millions of special interest money coming into these campaigns and no record of where its coming from and that should be a concern to every voter in this country.
TAPPER: Their answer would be why should they disclose. No one's disclosing.
AXELROD: Right and they have a point there. We tried to pass a law in the Congress — every Democrat in the Senate voted for it, every Republican in the Senate voted against it — that said everyone has to disclose. That all these organizations would have to disclose where their money is coming from whether they are supporting Democratic candidates or Republican candidates. The Republicans blocked that bill and the question to them and their allies is: what are they hiding that they don’t want the American people to see?
TAPPER: But you're asking the Chamber to prove a negative. “Prove that you’re not doing such and such accusation.”
AXELROD: It’s not proving a negative, Jake, because all you have to do to clear up the questions is reveal who your donors are from. The question back to them is why don’t they want to reveal where their money is coming from? I think the answer is, I think if the American people knew where their money was coming from they’d be a lot less apt to listen to the advertising, to read the mail, to respond to the kind of negative campaigns that the Chamber and some of these other organizations are underwriting.
TAPPER: But there's a difference between the Chamber and some of these other organizations, right? The Chamber we know what it stands for , we know basically the money is coming from big business and corporations. These other groups I understand, they have names like “Americans For Prosperity” we don’t know what they stand for or who’s behind it. But the Chamber is different, isn’t it?
AXELROD: Well we certainly do know about the Chamber, that they have foreign affiliates and they do raise money for the organization that way. What we don’t know is where the millions of dollars $75 million, is coming from that they are using to fund these campaigns. And the question back to them keeps coming back from us and others is why not simply say? What is it that is so nefarious about the sources of their money that they won’t reveal it? And that’s true with all these organizations.
TAPPER: Democratic organizations too?
AXELROD: I would be for disclosure for everyone. The American people ought to know where millions and millions of dollars in our campaigns are coming from. Whether they are supporting Democrats or Republicans. Transparency is what we need in the political system. What we don’t need are special interests spending millions of dollars in these campaigns, to influence these campaign, never owning up to it, but having more muscle in the congress than they already have.
TAPPER: But haven't third parties like these helped Democrats in the past?
AXELROD: Yes, I’m not suggesting that only groups that support Republicans should disclose. It think everyone in this process should disclose. It’s an unhealthy thing when the insurance industry, when Wall Street, when oil companies can pour millions and millions of dollars into campaigns and never own up to it . And it would be true on the Democratic side as well, it’s not healthy for democracy, it’s not good for everyday people.
TAPPER: But this isn't really about the Chamber itself, this is really about the president's vision of a worst case scenario.
AXELROD: Well what this is about, when this is done we’re going to see hundreds of millions of dollars spent by organizations who don’t disclose the source of that money. And that means any interest group can write a million dollar check, a ten million dollar check, to try to defeat a candidate, in order to push their agenda in the Congress and no one will ever know exactly what their involvement was. And that is not just a threat to Democrats, that is a threat to democracy.
TAPPER: And that's what you guys are worried about here? Some group going to a member of Congress –
AXELROD: It is a insidious, dangerous thing when people can contribute huge sums of money to run negative ads in campaigns and never confess or allow to their participation. It opens the door to all kinds of chicanery. And when the next Congress meets if there are people who are standing there who are beneficiaries of their campaigns, you’ll know in whose interest they are going to act.
TAPPER: But what do you say to people who argue you are demonizing an organization for a charge that nobody knows if it's true or not?
AXELROD: Well I’m not demonizing the Chamber of Commerce. I’m simply suggesting to them that they disclose the source of the $75 million that they are spending in campaigns and put to rest, put to rest the questions that have been, that have been raised.
TAPPER: Isn't that like the whackjobs that tell the president he needs to show them his full long-form birth certificate so he can put to rest the questions that have been raised?
AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.
TAPPER: The long form?
AXELROD: Someone once in the course of this debate about whether we should have a law to force these organizations to disclose where they’re money is coming from in the campaigns, someone said, and I think they’re right – “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.” If the Chamber doesn’t have anything to hide about these contributions, and I take them at their word that they don’t, then why not disclose? Why not let people see where their money is coming from?
-Jake Tapper

Email
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
Ron Paul Ad's Call Santorum a 'Fake'
The White House true colors are becoming evident more and more each day. Go ahead …dig the hole deeper!
Posted by: Shawn | October 11, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
It is so ironic this controversy was ginned up by websites that do not disclose their funding.
Are ads the only way to influence elections? I think not.
Posted by: MayBee | October 11, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
I can’t believe you even give that loser Axlerod face time…
Posted by: maggie | October 11, 2010, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Fine and dandy David. How about Obama disclose where all his 2008 campaign donations came from then? Where’s all the cash coming from that the unions use (like the SEIU) to back Democrat candidates? What about George Soros? The Democrats are just upset because the Republicans are finally figuring out how to play like them.
Posted by: Ron | October 11, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
“the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.”
=========
I don’t believe this administration thinks this for a minute.
Posted by: MayBee | October 11, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
He’s gone from Transnational President Of The Whole World to xenophobic demogogue in 20 months.
Posted by: mesquito | October 11, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
I love how he uses words like “nefarious” and “insidious,” then says he’s not accusing the Chamber of anything. Then he says both Republicans and Democrats should disclose only to demonize groups the president has associated with Republicans (oil, wall street, insurance). All the while not mentioning the millions given to Democrats by unions, when half the unions paying dues to the AFL-CIO are international.
Posted by: Chris | October 11, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Right and they have a point there. We tried to pass a law in the Congress — every Democrat in the Senate voted for it, every Republican in the Senate voted against it — that said everyone has to disclose.
==========
FWIW, the DISCLOSE act did not require everyone to disclose, but instead exempted large organizations that met certain requirements.
Even the ACLU urged a “no” vote on the DISCLOSE act, saying:
“Our Constitution embraces public discussion of matters that are important to our nation’s future, and it respects the right of individuals to support those conversations without being exposed to unnecessary risks of harassment or embarrassment. Only reforms that promote speech, rather than limit it, and apply evenhandedly, rather than selectively, will bring positive change to our elections.”
Posted by: MayBee | October 11, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Tapper…TAPPER: The long form?
Axelrod: avoids and pivots
Posted by: pauldia | October 11, 2010, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Axelrod is an idiot. This would be like the TSA subjecting all air travelers to strip searches “just in case they’re hiding something.” In other words, assuming everyone is guilty and making them prove they’re innocent–the opposite of our legal system.
Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.
Posted by: Mary | October 11, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Where’s all the cash coming from that the unions use (like the SEIU) to back Democrat candidates?
Posted by: Gen X | October 11, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Jake, that was a great interview! I laughed so hard when you called him out on the ‘long form’… thanks for being so different and better than all the others.
Posted by: lisa | October 11, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.
Posted by: Mary |
I take it you are a Baby Boomer still stuck in the same culture wars.
Cliche and so last century.
Posted by: Gen X | October 11, 2010, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
How about a deal. Obama releases hid college records and long form Birth Certificate, and the Republicans agree to a new law mandating transparency for ALL political contributions.
Posted by: pauldia | October 11, 2010, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Posted by: Gen X | Oct 11, 2010 6:42:10 PM
Part of your generation in fact. LOL!
Posted by: Mary | October 11, 2010, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Part of your generation in fact. LOL!
Posted by: Mary |
Okay, so you just have a last century attitude. Thanks for the information though. LOL!
Posted by: Gen X | October 11, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Ed Taylor to David Axelrod:
“the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.”
If Obama doesn’t have anything to hide then why not disclose? Why not let people see where he was born?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | October 11, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
I’m sure that Axelrod feels the same about his UNION cronies who were to be exempted from the DISCLOSE Act unlike the Chamber of Commerce and others that Axelrod refers to.
The Obama Administration is rotten to the core.
And that last part of the interview and brining up the long form BC is priceless…..thanks for that, Tapper!!!
Posted by: Sharp Right Turn | October 11, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Enjoy the next two years of IRS audits, Mr Tapper. (And you’re not even on a donors’ list.)
Posted by: Andrew in Toronto | October 11, 2010, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Oh….and just for the record….Axelrod is engaging in the very tactic that nondisclosure of these donors is trying to avoid…..attacks by politicians in an effort to pressure the donors into not being active in the political process.
Non-disclosure is there to protect the donor from corrupt politicians like Axelrod and Obama!
Posted by: Sharp Right Turn | October 11, 2010, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
How ’bout telling us from which countries the donors are who supported pB0′s presidential campaign in 2008?
Posted by: Jack | October 11, 2010, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
“It’s unclear how well he did as an undergraduate, although he was not a distinguished student. Obama refuses to release his transcript from his undergraduate years. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, Obama was not well-known among classmates after he transferred to Columbia University from Occidental College in the early 1980s. The article quotes a former roommate who states that Obama’s performance improved after he stopped taking drugs (which Obama has admitted to openly). Since Obama did not graduate with honors, that means his GPA was between a 2.0 and a 3.3 — although, since he was admitted to Harvard Law School, it’s hard to imagine his GPA was much lower than a 3.3.”
Posted by: Jim Tayberry | October 11, 2010, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
What do you bet the Bush family’s old buddies the Saudis have been sliding boatloads of cash in through the back door of the Chamber of Commerce? The Republicans would love to sell us out to those guys….cancel all green and alternate energy efforts to keep the Saudi yoke on our backs while they kickback profits for Republican campaigns.
Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2010, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Axelrod’s strength is his ability to read character:
In 2004, Axelrod worked for John Edwards’ presidential campaign. During the campaign, he lost responsibility for making ads, but continued as the campaign’s spokesman. Regarding Edwards’ failed 2004 presidential campaign, Axelrod has commented, “I have a whole lot of respect for John, but at some point the candidate has to close the deal and — I can’t tell you why — that never happened with John.”
Gee, David, maybe the fact that he was a complete phony is why it never happened. Maybe American voters are smarter than you give them credit.
Posted by: Jim Tayberry | October 11, 2010, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
What do you bet the Bush family’s old buddies the Saudis have been sliding boatloads of cash
============
What do you think the Saudis might want, Skip? A $60billion arms deal?
‘Cuz Obama is already trying to get them that.
Posted by: MayBee | October 11, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Axelrod is blowing smoke. The only way for Obama to avoid public scrutiny is to create a distraction.
It isn’t working.
It’s hard to distract American workers who are unemployed because of the business killing policies of this administration.
Posted by: Bert | October 11, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Jake rocks, the question of the long form had me LOL
Posted by: Downwithsocialism | October 11, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
BP would be another prime suspect. They probably remember how easy Bush Sr made it for Exxon after the Valdez accident.
Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.
TAPPER: The long form?
AXELROD: “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.”
W O W !
What a revealing answer Axey gave you there Jake.
As to the rest of this money thing with the chamber
- N O N I S S U E -
These people have nothing going into the November election.
They are desperate.
Posted by: Noz | October 11, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Skip is following the Obama lead: make an outrageous and false charge for which you have no evidence, then demand that the victim disprove it.
The fact is that the Chamber (like the Sierra Club) has foreign affiliates that pay annual dues. In the cas of the Chamber, those dues constitute one twentieth of one percent of its annual budget. That money, by law, segregated from money used for political advocacy.
This is McCarthyism.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2010, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
someone said, and I think they’re right – “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.”
=======
Who here is comfortable with the President’s senior adviser saying this?
Do you think he believes it?
Posted by: MayBee | October 11, 2010, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Nobody is REQUIRED to do anything just to shut David Axelrod up. Obama never reconciled all his anonymous donors.
Posted by: Dave | October 11, 2010, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
I want to see the vid Jake. Do you have it?
Posted by: Menderman | October 11, 2010, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Obama took something like $400 million in donations from people and organizations that have not been identified to this day.
Even the New York Times is repulsed by this false smear.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Where is the money coming from? Why is that such a difficult question? Why is it such a suprise that people want to know where the money is coming from? Is the truth such an unreasonable thing to ask?
Posted by: ChuckWildman | October 11, 2010, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Way to go Jake, on the birth certificate question! I’ve been saying that for 18 hours… And I happen to believe Obama was born here. But fair, is definitely fair. Is there video?
Posted by: Liz | October 11, 2010, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Senator McCarthy would be proud.
Except he was going after actual communists, not bankers, investors, doctors, plumbers and all the rest of us bitter clingers.
Ya know what’s interesting? Obama has never dissed lawyers. I guess it is because we all know lawyers are not greedy.
Posted by: West | October 11, 2010, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
He’s like the young person with not much real experience who goes to work at a non-profit without realizing that it is profit that allows the non-profit to exist. He simply has no clue how things really work. Barry has never worked a day in his blessed life, what is so shocking about his attitudes…
Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz Miller | October 11, 2010, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
I would love to see Barry’s college transcripts…but like Billy Jeff’s medical history, the leftist media will keep on ignoring it long enough as possible for it to be forgotten.
Funny how that happens.
I bet Barry was a horrible student, on par with the wondrous Al Gore.
Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz Miller | October 11, 2010, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
McCarthyism is alive and well in the era of Hopenchange.
Great questioning by Jake, the following exchange was especially precious:
TAPPER: Isn’t that like the whackjobs that tell the president he needs to show them his full long-form birth certificate so he can put to rest the questions that have been raised?
AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.
TAPPER: The long form?
Excellent. No response from Axe…
Posted by: tjp612 | October 11, 2010, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
The problem with this? Axelrod hates liberals. He’s said so publicly. Given that, why would I listen to or care what he says? Answer: I don’t.
Posted by: jan | October 11, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Perhaps the Obama Apologists can explain the following:
Donations from Foreign-Connected Political Actions Committees for 2010 Election Cycle:
To Democrats: $6,517,903
To Republicans: $5,581,701
Source: Opensecrets.org
Where is this money coming from Democrats?
Those who live in glass houses…
Posted by: tjp612 | October 11, 2010, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Jake, you guys going to look into all those foreign debit card donations to Obama in the 08 elections that you refused to look into while you elected this fool. Perhaps you could look into them, now that you will have lots of time while this guy slowly melts like the wicked witch right before our eyes.
Posted by: mrbill | October 11, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
What about all the US taxpayer money that went to Kenya to try to influence the vote over a constitutional change? And what about Barry himself, US senator going to Kenya to help his favorite candidates’ campaign? So hypocritical.
Posted by: Elle | October 11, 2010, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
McCarthyism! I don’t see anybody being personally persecuted here. But it says alot about how egregious Republican supporters admit these charges are.
Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2010, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Obama and Axelrod are once again using Saul Alinsky’s Rule #13 (from Rules for Radicals): “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” They regularly use this rule to attack anyone who dares to express any dissent, including private citizens.
Posted by: Mary | October 11, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
“They regularly use this rule to attack anyone who dares to express any dissent, including private citizens”
As a citizen of THIS country you can express all the dissent you want. Just don’t finance it with foreign currency and tell us its a domestic effort.
Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2010, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:15:17 PM
First of all, no President in our lifetime has attacked private citizens and organizations more than Obama. That isn’t even debatable.
The US Chamber of Commerce story is a phony issue. You’ve been duped. Again.
Eric Lichtblau reported in the New York Times that “there is little evidence that what the chamber does in collecting overseas dues is improper or even unusual. They do get money from foreign Chambers of Commerce but it’s a very small amount and entirely separate from the campaign spend. But look at this. If you look at the issue of foreign money, actually, U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies are under campaign law allowed to operate political action committees and in the past year, in the past election cycle, they’ve given more than $12 million. So there is some, let’s call it foreign-connected money, if not actually foreign money that’s involved in this campaign cycle.”
And CNBC Washington correspondent Eamon Javers stated, “Well, we’ve got about 160 of these PACs. Interestingly here, President Obama might want to look up the statistics because they’re favoring Democrats. More than $6 million has gone to Democrats and more than $5 million has gone to Republicans from those subsidiaries – subsidiaries of foreign companies. So clearly that group favoring the Democrats by a pretty healthy margin.”
Oops! But there’s more.
During his campaign, Obama collected $233 million of campaign contributions whose origin was never traced, though at least one analyst at the FEC suspected a significant portion came from foreign sources.
Posted by: Mary | October 11, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
“First of all, no President in our lifetime has attacked private citizens and organizations more than Obama. That isn’t even debatable”
You must be suffering from self-induced Bush era Amnesia. The Republicans attacked anyone and everyone who criticized the Iraq war and their fiscal policies as being unpatriotic.
Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2010, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Axelrod makes sense in places. So, if Obama doesn’t have anything to hide, why not show us the long form birth certificate? 57% of Americans are no longer convinced Obama was born in the US> We are already in a crisis of confidence. Officers in the military are refusing to obey orders because Obama has not shown his birth certificate. People are being court martialed. War heroes are having their careers ruined because Obama has not shown his birth certificate.
It is time to stop ridiculing the birthers and start demanding to see the long form birth certificate!
Posted by: RoninIrvine | October 11, 2010, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:47:05 PM
President Bush verbally accosted and mocked private citizens? Really? Provide proof because I have plenty of Obama doing it.
Posted by: Mary | October 11, 2010, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
For Axelrod, President Obama, and the Democrats in charge, it’s “transparency for thee, but not for me”. Yes, transparency would be nice…in fact, it’s what these people ran on in 2008. But once elected, they didn’t give a flip. All of the meetings on Stimulus and Health Care were done in secret with their 3rd party groups like Apollo Alliance, Unions, etc. So, please DON”T talk about transparency. The C of C is pro-business, so of course this administration hates them!
Posted by: MLM411 | October 11, 2010, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
How about, I’ll show you mine, if you show me yours? The Chamber should make that deal with Obama. If he shows his long form, legal birth certificate, his school records and everything else that’s been sealed, then they will reveal the donors.
That will shut them up.
Posted by: J | October 11, 2010, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Posted by: Skip | Oct 11, 2010 10:47:05 PM
Skip, I don’t know why you bring up such a lame argument that even a 5th grader wouldn’t attempt. Mary said it wasn’t debatable and that means it isn’t debatable.
Obama has attacked more private citizens and organizations than any other President. File that under Truth.
Posted by: Noz | October 11, 2010, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Axelrod is a total bonehead who is being paid by Obama to shill for him. His paycheck is his loyalty. Utter nonsense on top of it, …..where is the disclosure of the campaign funds Obummer supposedly got off of the internet 1 or 2 dollars at a time,….yeah right. I seem to remember Obummer saying his credit card software “malfunctioned” so they couldn’t trace it back to the source.
Posted by: Joe | October 11, 2010, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
“Officers in the military are refusing to obey orders because Obama has not shown his birth certificate”
How many? 2 or 3 unfortunates out of hundreds of thousands? I would call that insignificant. And don’t try and make victims out of these fools, they were quite adequately warned that they don’t have a legal leg to stand on.
Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2010, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
This moron is just trying to rabble rouse and create something, anything to try and stir up anything as the Dems head toward Niagra Falls in a small boat. The crowd lines the shore watching them go faster and faster in current, …..but alas they are past the power plant and it’s too late to throw them a rope,….they’re going to go over the Falls, and there is no stopping them.
Posted by: Joe | October 11, 2010, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
This coming from a guy who is funded by NGO’s and multinational organizations all around the world! To quote John Stossel: “Give Me a Break!”
Posted by: B.S. | October 11, 2010, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Interesting how Jake asks about the “long form” birth certificate. You’ve got to know he really doesn’t believe Obama and neither does Newt. But neither of them wants to be labeled a “birther” so they dance around it by first calling people like me “whackjobs”, or saying they personally believe he was born in Hawaii, “but”,…….
The bottom line is the Democratic Party led by Pelosi and Reid scammed America by not researching Obama’s past. They didn’t research anything and everybody knows it.
Obama could easily have been born in Kenya as anybody can get a Hawaiian birth certificate.
Posted by: Joe | October 11, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Provide proof because I have plenty of Obama doing it.
Posted by: Mary | Oct 11, 2010 11:01:21 PM
Let’s see it. Sounds like a bald-faced lie to me. Quote in context, date, source.
Posted by: true blue | October 11, 2010, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Interesting how Jake asks about the “long form” birth certificate.
——-
Interesting is one word for it. Just another Halperin chasing Drudge.
Posted by: true blue | October 11, 2010, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
“Mary said it wasn’t debatable and that means it isn’t debatable”
Your confidence in Mary always being right is touching in a way Noz, however as for myself I’m not ready to delegate parental authority to her just yet.
See after Kerry got swiftboated Democratic strategists decided to respond strongly and directly to any future right-wing propaganda and this is I’m sure what the attacks are that Mary is referring to. Republicans in office are content to allow the right-wing smear machine do their dirty work for them. In fact guys like Rush Limbaugh make a living doing precisely that.
Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2010, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
So, a rape case haunts Buck, Miller won’t divulge any further any information to the press for the remainder of the campaign and wants to repeal the 17th amendment,one of Cantor’s young bucks is associated with some creepy group that glorifies Nazi’s, Christine O’Donnell is a science illiterate with fewer logic skills than a gnat and yet….
d most of the people on here are upset that an Obama aide and Obama think disclosure when it comes to campaign contributions is a good idea.
Unbelievable.
Something tells me we’re not going to be going in the right direction in this country for a very long time if dems, young bright people, progressives, liberals, thinking independents don’t get out there and vote.
If they win, everybody loses. They’re that crazy.
Posted by: true blue | October 11, 2010, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Wow, the stench of desperation coming from obama’s inner circle as the election draws near is overwhelming. If they will stoop to this sort of McCarthyism now, what on earth will they do to try to save their administration in the 2012 reelection bid? the mind boggles.
Posted by: moderate | October 11, 2010, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
true blew wrote:”d most of the people on here are upset that an Obama aide and Obama think disclosure when it comes to campaign contributions is a good idea. ”
.
oBama says… disclosure for thee, but not for me.
Posted by: gk | October 11, 2010, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Lots of right-wingers are saying the McCarthyism thing now…..so where did all the parrots hear it? Beck?
Posted by: Skip | October 12, 2010, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Not a single word from the media – including you Jake – on all the money spent by Moveon.org in 2004 and 2008. Of course, this is only interesting because Moveon operates under the EXACT SAME rules as the Chamber. It’s only become a “story” since Republicans started to win the money game – before that, no so much.
Posted by: Lincoln's Ghost | October 12, 2010, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Lots of right-wingers are saying the McCarthyism thing now…..so where did all the parrots hear it? Beck?
Posted by: Skip | Oct 12, 2010 12:00:33 AM
Kinda funny given they’re the ones that have been in Red Scare mode since the general election.
But speaking of McCarthy– sorta– Kevin McCarthy, another GOP “Young Gun” (not the one who dresses up as a Nazi) and one of the “geniuses” behind the vacant Republican “Pledge to America” was pressed to name one– just one– program he’d cut from the federal budget to reduce spending. He couldn’t. He dodged the question, and then came up with the embarrassing statement: “the line item would be across-the-board.”
Most Republicans have been unable to name any programs they would cut to reduce the deficit. They call themselves fiscal conservatives but they’re just reactionaries.
Posted by: true blue | October 12, 2010, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Of course, this is only interesting because Moveon operates under the EXACT SAME rules as the Chamber.
—
Except they don’t. Someone commented on this earlier, I think. See Posted by: Gen X | Oct 11, 2010 6:40:51 PM or go directly to Plum Line (‘Scarborough retracts false claim about lefty groups’ disclosure. Will Rove and other righties do same?’) or Raw Story (‘Scarborough retracts claim that MoveOn doesn’t disclose donors’) or open secrets (under PACS, moveon contributors)
Get informed. You owe it to yourself.
Posted by: true blue | October 12, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am
In 2008, the Democrats refused to disclose!!! Obama received contributions totalling almost a billion dollars!
Maybe the “unidentifiable” donations explains all of Obama’s bowing to foreign leaders.
This is the most corrupt administration in American history.
We need to replace the lying liberals and take our country back.
Posted by: WE NEED TO REPLACE THE LYING LIBERALS IN CONGRESS! | October 12, 2010, 1:01 am 1:01 am
the Democrats refused to disclose!!!
—
Source?
Posted by: true blue | October 12, 2010, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Ok Barry you want to see were the money is coming from?
Here’s the deal.
You show me yours I’ll show you mine.
“YOURS” would be your long form birth certificate and ALL of you school records plus transcripts and grades from grade school to present.
What?
Oh I forgot, you got in through affirmative action.
Posted by: voted against carter | October 12, 2010, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Careful, Jake, you keep asking these sorts of probing real-journalist questions and making these Obama functionaries squirm and paint themselves in a corner, you’ll not be invited to the next White House Press Appreciation Celebration.
Posted by: serr8d | October 12, 2010, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Wow! Real Journalism by ABC….Congrats….unfortunately…rules do not apply to Dems
Posted by: Bruce | October 12, 2010, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Tapper should have pressed the birth certificate. He never answered the ?. This administration is nothing but sleez.
Posted by: illeram Nad | October 12, 2010, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Heck, no one remembers but obama during the election was pounding in over 600 million dollars in campaign contributions and setting records… there has been questions floating around for over 2 years now about where it all came from, and that a number of muslim nations funneled money into his campaign. I think if were going to question where campaign money is coming from, the most logical place to start scrutinizing is right at the TOP.
Posted by: Kess | October 12, 2010, 3:08 am 3:08 am
Why does Jake not press Axelrod to answer the question about the long form?? It should be pretty obvious that Axelrod dodged the question entirely.
Posted by: ksdb | October 12, 2010, 3:21 am 3:21 am
Democrats should not be throwing stones on this topic. The only thing they are accomplishing is to remind the public about the questions that were raised about Obama’s fundraising in 2008.
Posted by: mwl | October 12, 2010, 5:49 am 5:49 am
exactly what we’ve been asking for all along: full disclosure. Debit card donations in ’08? $150,000,000 from where? Who is that voting for obama…there! that guy..the one with the big ears, funny nose, and long tail, singing, “M-I-C……….K-E-Y….” College transcripts? Only conservatives need to show their stinkin’ transcripts…the elite are already known to be so intelligent that their gpa’s are taken for granted…..Yep, axelrod, full disclosure. So you and the administration’s goons can go after them? Maybe harrass them with IRS audits?
Posted by: ncpilot09 | October 12, 2010, 6:03 am 6:03 am
Could this be the return of REAL journalism??? If so, please do an article on NY State refusing to comply with the MOVE act and thereby denying our soldiers overseas the right to vote..
Posted by: ncpilot09 | October 12, 2010, 6:05 am 6:05 am
Source?
Posted by: true blue
—
blah, blah, blah … Fact is, there is a source and the majority is sick and tired of it. Watching this man embarrass himself this way is not a pretty sight.
Nov 3 2010 should be declared a national holiday. The End Of Barak Obama Day.
Posted by: smartlillena | October 12, 2010, 6:34 am 6:34 am
The posts on this story…on an ABC site, not Fox News…speaks volumes about where the American people are on this Administration. We are fed up with their lies, distortions and outright failure to do anything to help the economy or provide jobs. The Republicans will have a hard time doing better, but one thing they can do, which has worked in the past, is lower taxes on all individuals and businesses who, after all, are the ones who provide jobs.
Posted by: mardec | October 12, 2010, 7:43 am 7:43 am
“…someone said, and I think they’re right – ‘the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.’”
So that means Obama wants to keep something secret by hiding his long form birth certificate?
Sure you want to go with that answer, Axelrod?
Posted by: George | October 12, 2010, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I LOL’ed reading that exchange.
Posted by: ChooChoo | October 12, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am
this character Obama should be forced to provide an apostilled, official copy of his birth certificate; compliant with the Hague Convention. This is what any other person would need to get a passport, residency permit, or work permit in most countries- including socialist countries in Europe. This character Obama (sic) should also disclose what other legal name(s) he has used, when the names were changed, and what citizenship and/or passport(s) he has held over his lifetime of international living and name changing.
Posted by: Ed | October 12, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Hey Axelrod, since your boy said he was born at Kapiolani hospital the same time period as the Nordyke twins why doesn’t his birth certificate have a doctor’s signature and hospital of birth like theirs? Try to spin that FIB!
Posted by: jleinf | October 12, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am
The chamber of commerce takes in 200, million in dues a year of which 100 thousand is from foreign dues payers LOL Its miniscule. At the same time the clinton administration got millions from the red Chinese military, and Obama received millions in prepaid credit cards, which have been tracked to the middle east and Asian. Obama stop Lying!!!!
Posted by: rickdc | October 12, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Tapper couldn’t follow up on the long form question. He would have lost his job. In fact, I am pretty sure he had his knucles rapped by the ABC headmistress for bringing the topic up in the first place. Trust me, it won’t happen again.
Posted by: gt_from_TLH | October 12, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Absolutely none of this makes sense. Why did Axelrod mount a negative attack ad against his political opponents when he could have just as easily run a bright, positive ad about Pres. Obama sticking it to the real criminals of our times, the banking industry for vetoing H.R. 3808?
This bill, if allowed, would have changed the notary laws of this country to allow any notary from any state to be recognized as a legal notarization. In effect, this would have made it much easier for the banking industry to foreclose using incorrect or fraudulent mortgage instruments.
As it stands now, and thinks to Pres. Obama leadership, these mortgages will have to be renegotiated from scratch, including re-appraisements based on the property’s present value.
This is GREAT news. Why hasn’t the Axelrod and the DNC run on this issue?
ex animo
davidfarrar
Posted by: davidfarrar | October 12, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am
You show me yours I’ll show you mine.
“YOURS” would be your long form birth certificate and ALL of you school records plus transcripts and grades from grade school to present.
—
Well yours should be worth a guffaw.
To all the reasonable folks out there, read these comments and think about it. If these enthused and rabid crazy con voters win, everybody loses.
They don’t have a single good idea.
Posted by: true blue | October 12, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Jake – the American people are “whackjobs” for wanting the POTUS to show his long birth certificate? It’s this type of non-journalism that fuels the Tea Party. Do you mean to tell us that no mainstream news organization is interested in why Obama is spending HUNDREDS of THOUSANDs of dollars in legal representation to prevent the disclosure of a $10 birth certificate? In fact, when Obama tried to recoup legal fees from one plaintiff, he had to withdraw his claim because the damages could have mitigated by the defendant (BO) by simply releasing the birth certificate. WHY WON’T HE?!!! And we’re the whackjobs???
Posted by: ErikP | October 12, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Mr. Axelrod: Thank you for clearing up that birth certificate thingy. We knew he had something to hide and you just confirmed it. Now fess up – did Barry really graduate from anything? Well, prove it, stupid. For some reason a million dollars has been spent keeping that information from us.
Posted by: Judy Johnson | October 12, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am
100% Verifiable Facts
If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt (which had
taken more than two centuries to accumulate) in one year, would you
have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he
never even read would you think that he is just an ignorant hot
head?If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state
in the United States to force that state to continue to allow
illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder whose side he was on?
If George W. Bush had put 87000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?
If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87000 American workers unemployed would you support him?
If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM
stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you
have approved?
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special
Olympics, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and
incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a
thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have
approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing
videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the
nonexistent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a
minor slip?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with
people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United
States , would you have said that he is clueless.
If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a
five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking
out his front door in Texas , would you have thought he was a self
important, conceited, egotistical jerk?
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the
5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he
tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
If George W. Bush had misspelled the word “advice” would you have
hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?
If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a
single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?
If George W. Bush’s administration had Okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am
If you think the MSM looks bad now wait until Obama’s birth certificate issue goes to court and it will be acknowledged that they covered for him. Then the American people will be rid of the so called MSM, the Democrat Party and Obama and his minions!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Is that the pot calling the kettle black or what.
the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.
Release the Long Form and go to jail for treason
Posted by: CTB | October 12, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
And it sure looks like he does. Obama is the only president who has suppressed vital personal information; every other has made full disclosure. When the press raised a fuss about John McCain’s birth particulars – since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone – he immediately released all his actual documents, thousands of pages worth, including those showing that he was a natural-born American citizen, as per the United States Code [8 U.S.C. 1403 (a)]. Obama did not follow suit, and the media let him off the hook. The document released online is not an authentic birth certificate. It is the “short form” affidavit, a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) with standard information left out, such as the actual name of the birth hospital and the name of the attending physician. In “Dreams from My Father,” Obama mentions having found his birth certificate, which, as it turns out, was then conveniently lost in a small house fire. Nor would the two announcements in Honolulu newspapers confirming his birth constitute proof of American citizenship or be accepted as such in a court of law, for obvious reasons.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Some people consider the “birther” controversy an unfortunate distraction from more important matters, as, for example, Obama’s propensity for making inexplicable decisions or the mass of other significant documents kept under seal. Focusing on the affair, they say, is counter-productive. Many feel it is nothing but a slanderous and partisan campaign that does not merit the attention of mature observers. Still others are simply afraid of being mercilessly ridiculed and written off as wingnuts, or intuit it is demonstrably unsafe to meddle in such concerns. And many, too, simply cannot believe that a hoax of this enormity can have been successfully perpetrated in a free society and consequently cannot but regard the birther claims as the product of deranged minds – but then, the worldwide AGW scam might have educated us to such possibilities. The malign influence of a complicit media is extremely powerful, seeping into the consciousness of even the most hardened skeptics and leaving a residue of unwarranted belief in the untenable or problematic. Finally, some who suspect the birthers may be right feel it would do more harm to America to expose an imposture of this magnitude than to let it run its course until the next election when Obama might be voted out of office. “Might be,” regrettably, is not “will be.”
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Axel, I agree totally about transperencey-you and Obama go first, lets see where all that foreign money came for his election as well as his long form birth certificate!!!!!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am
For it is not merely Obama’s putative illegitimacy but the fact of Obama himself with all the harm he is doing both domestically and internationally that may conceivably lead to major dislocations, far worse than the disasters of Jimmy Carter’s administration or the blowback naiveté of Woodrow Wilson’s. Indeed, what we see developing is a cataclysm from which America may not be able to recover. That is why the legitimacy question needs to be pursued until it is settled one way or another. The stirring finale of Ezra Pound’s celebrated Pisan Canto LXXXI serves as a cautionary tale: “Here error is all in the not done,/all in the diffidence that faltered.” What is not helpful to the nation as a whole is precisely Obama’s continued occupancy of the White House. This is the reason so burning an issue should not be suffered to just gutter out. For in the electoral framework, it seems the only way to dismiss Obama from office before his destructive term is up is via impeachment, and the only way this can conceivably happen is for the courts to accede to disclosure requests, assuming that Obama does indeed have something to hide.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Even if we refrain from coming to unequivocal conclusions on this file, it seems almost certain that his records must contain damaging information that could bring his presidency into serious, if not terminal disrepute. How else would one explain the fact that his university transcripts and his records as an Illinois state legislator, like his “long-form” birth certificate, are inaccessible and that Obama has hired a team of lawyers to make sure they remain that way? This behavior is completely unprecedented in POTUS annals, and he should be duly challenged on it. Requiring Obama to open his dossier is not a sign of conspiratorial suspicions; it is quite simply a civil responsibility and the most reasonable of demands since this is precisely what all U.S. presidents should do and have done. Shirking this responsibility, however, is largely a symptom of either moral cowardice or false propriety, irrespective of how it may be embroidered for public consumption or self-protection. Of course, there are some who demur out of a sense of fundamental decency which, we might note, goes unreciprocated by the president and his team.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Mr.Axelrod,you never answered the question about the long form birth cirtificate and if we follow your logic in the Chamber of commerce thing and apply it to the wackjob birthers then you are left lacking…you need to answer this so dose the president and if you ignore the questions be sure the people will bring about the proper conclusion to this avoidance and deception.
Posted by: BRIAN | October 12, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am
What about Obama’s qualifications and experience led people to expect any better from him?
He was brought up by grandparents who were socialists, his mentor as a child, Frank Marshall Davis, was an extreme socialist, he was steeped in Marxist-oriented black liberation theology by Rev. Wright in Chicago, his political colleagues were extreme Palestinian radicals like Rashid Khalidi, unrepentant domestic terrorists like Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn and thugs like Tony Rezko. He was considered the most liberal member of the Senate. He had never authored a single bill as a Senator. He was very partisan and never reached across the aisle. He had a well know reputation of using people and then throwing them under the bus if they became inconvenient.
Obama as a viable candidate was a myth created by his own brazen lies and those of the mainstream media as well as the blogosphere exemplified by the collusion we have seen with the Journolist scandals.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:05 am 11:05 am
o Obama’s “Birth Certificate” has never been made public. What was released is a document titled “Certification of Live Birth” and was used at the time of Obama’s birth to document births that occurred outside a hospital or outside of the country. Until last year the state of Hawaii did not accept these documents to prove Hawaiian native birthright claims! The newspaper announcements at that time were issued automatically whenever a “Birth Certificate” or a “Certification of Live Birth” were registered. The announcements prove nothing other than a document recording Obama’s birth was issued, which document would not have been used if he were (as he and his supporters claim) born in a Hawaiian hospital! If Obama wants to put the matter to rest release his original, long-form Birth Certificate!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Obama, Sr. was a Kenyan citizen. Therefore, his son was not, is not, and never will be a “natural born” citizen. That FACT disqualifies him from ever becoming President of the United States. He is in there illegally and should be removed from “office”.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am
• While in the Senate, Obama voted “YES” on these budget deficits that he now blames Bush for!
Obama signed his name to them before they ever got to Bush’s desk.
They’re OBAMA’S deficits just as much as they are Bush’s.
And they’re certainly not the Republican’s Budget mess…
March 2007 – $2.9Trillion Budget passed 52-47:
47 Republican Senators voted against it, but Obama voted FOR it. That was a DEMOCRAT Budget.
March 2008 – $3.1Trillion Budget passed 51-44:
44 Republican Senators voted against it, but Obama voted FOR it. That was also a DEMOCRAT Budget.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am
• “The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States .”¬ George Soros
In 2008, Soros donated $5,000,000,000 to the Democratic National Committee, DNC, to insure Obama’s win and wins for many other Alinsky trained Radical Rules Anti-American Socialist. George has been contributing a $ billion plus to the DNC since Clinton came on the scene.
Soros has dirtied both sides of the aisle, trust me. And if that weren’t bad enough, he has long held connections with the CIA.
And I mustn’t forget to mention Soros’ involvement with the MSM (Main Stream Media), the entertainment industry (e.g. he owns 2.6 million shares of Time Warner), and the various political advertising organizations he funnels millions to. In short, George Soros controls or influence most of the MSM. Little wonder they ignore the TEA PARTY, Soro’s NEMESIS.
As Matthew Vadum writes, “The liberal billionaire-turned-philanthropist has been buying up media properties for years in order to drive home his message to the American public that they are too materialistic, too wasteful, too selfish, and too stupid to decide for themselves how to run their own lives.”
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:08 am 11:08 am
“well, yours should be worth a guffaw,”Perhaps, but the author is not running for anything,nor making any claims of being a brilliant scholar as the media has for Obama. If he is so smart why isn’t he a Phi Beta Kappa? And why are you using a Canadian expression,true blue?Or is it tierra?
Posted by: Nephron | October 12, 2010, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Did anyone miss it? The presidential election ended in November 2008. Get over it birthers, you lost. You whine more than the left that says Bush stole the election in 2000, yet, Democrats congratulated Bush and moved on and tackled the challenges facing the country. Being a sore loser is pathetic, being a sore loser in power is a danger to both parties.
Posted by: C | October 12, 2010, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Is there more to the interview than what is posted here. Tapper’s last question was not answered as usual. Did he just accept the answer and move on? What kind of reporting is this? What happened to the media, no one has any backbone anymore, just accept their spin. I sure hope the new breed of reporters does not follow this current crew in the way they ask questions.
Posted by: Daryl Solodar | October 12, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am
C,the problem is that Obama has not released the long-form,nor any significant education,travel or health records.Two years after the election and still this obfuscation is brought up by of all people a MSM journalist.It is not going to go away until Obama just does the simple thing-the fact that he doesn’t implies that something is wrong with the meme; to this day there has not been a single credible excuse as to why he hasn’t released the information.Why?
Posted by: Nephron | October 12, 2010, 11:26 am 11:26 am
C- If you think the dems have forgotten the election of 2000 then I have a bridge for sale for you in Brookly as I still see this issue on bliberal blogs all the time. Besides Bush won that fair and square according to a MY Times investigation after the election. The eligibility issue is a current legitimate issue!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
“They [The Chamber of Commerce] can put this to rest,” said Joshua Earnest, a White House spokesman. “They have the keys to the file cabinet.”
Isn’t this the essence of “Birtherism” ??
Posted by: John Q Public | October 12, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Richard Poe writes, “Soros’ private philanthropy, totaling nearly $5 billion, continues undermining America ‘s traditional Western values. His giving has provided funding of abortion rights, atheism, drug legalization, sex education, euthanasia, feminism, gun control, globalization, mass immigration, gay marriage and other radical experiments in social engineering.”
Some of the many NGOs (None Government Organizations) that Soros funds with his billions are: MoveOn.org, the Apollo Alliance , Media Matters for America , the Tides Foundation, the ACLU, ACORN, PDIA (Project on Death In America ), La Raza, and many more. For a more complete list, with brief descriptions of the NGOs, go to DiscoverTheNetworks.org.
Poe continues, “Through his global web of Open Society Institutes and Open Society Foundations, Soros has spent 25 years recruiting, training, indoctrinating and installing a network of loyal operatives in 50 countries, placing them in positions of influence and power in media, government, finance and academia.”
Without Soro’s money, would the Saul Alinsky’s Chicago machine still be rolling? Would SEIU, ACORN, and La Raza still be pursuing their nefarious activities? Would Big Money and lobbyists still be corrupting government? Would our college campuses still be retirement homes for 1960s radicals?
America stands at the brink of an abyss, and that fact is directly attributable to Soros. Soros has vigorously, cleverly, and insidiously planned the ruination of America and his puppet, Barak Obama is leading the way.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am
George Soros is a tremendously wealthy man who made alot more money in the 2008 crash. It was the Far Left and Fannie Mae who imposed lowering banking standards…and Soros has been reaping the profits from the crash.
Soros wants to run the world. Let him be the first to share his ill-gotten wealth with the poor, the hypocrite…He cares nothing for our poor who were duped into purchasing homes they could not afford…many of them minorities.
The minorities in our country are being duped again to gain Far Left votes.
George Soros — stop meddling with our country. Get out….and stay out. You intend only economic destruction on America…shame…what has the country of your origins done for the world???
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
to C:
The 2000 election controversy had its day in court and determined that the Secretary of State did exactly the right thing, since the criteria to delay certification was not met (which are comprised of 3 things: 1. An act of God preventing voting 2. Machines not working – tests before and after determined the machines worked fine 3. Evidence of fraud). None of these were present (people not understanding the ballot does not fit into the above 3).
BO’s long-form birth certificate has never been disclosed. All court cases have been dismissed due to plaintiff not having standing (yeah, right!) or some other non-germane point.
Let me ask you one question, C: Why would Obama spend $500k-$1,000K in legal fees to fight the disclosure every step of the way? Until someone answers that question in a cogent manner, the “birthers” will never go away.
Posted by: ErikP | October 12, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
• Even if he was born in the White House, his father was an alien, therefore Obama, Soetoto, or whatever his name is– is NOT a NATURAL BORN citizen(not the same as native born or naturalized).
There is also some serious doubt that he was even born in the USA.
Don’t forget that he has used 16 Social Security numbers, including 042-68-4425 (Google it!), the one he gets paid with in the White House, which was issued to a man born in Connecticut in 1890!
Add to that a phony Selective Service registration, possible hidden disbarment from the Illinois Bar, election fraud, and other things, adding up to enough felonies to keep in locked up for a long, long time.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines, a Former Federal Examiner with a long history of expert testimony in state and federal courts, has testified in an affidavit that states, in part:
Sandra Lines says, “I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Dr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.” Sandra Ramsey Lines summary is posted at U. S. Law Blog.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am
As a small businessman I think this is the worst economy we have seen since the Carter years of double digit interest rates and run-a-way inflation. I also believe it is going to get worse before it gets better. Am I angry? You are darn right I am. The is the richest Nation on earth and we are suffering only because of the huge amount of debt our government has laid upon us. There is no reason that we as taxpayers should have to pay for every damn welfare program known to man, including the financing of such Marxist organizations as the United Nations, Council of Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral Commission, and others; the giving of vast amounts of foreign aid to Muslim countries such as Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey; the propping up of despondent countries such as Mexico; all who secretly hate us. And finally, there is no reason we should subsidize billions of dollars in incentives for Unions, Special Interest Groups and Multi-National Companies just so they can rape our country of assets, money and wealth. We have a bunch of gutless elites in Washington that site on their fat asses and sip tea or cognac while the country goes down the drain. Their attitude is one of, “well, we don’t care, we are not suffering.” It is do disgusting I am surprised we don’t have a true rebellion and civil war by now. Maybe we just haven’t gotten that far yet?
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Axelrod demands a negative be proven.
He is a tool.
There are any number of Obama supporting groups (like CAP) which do not identify their donors. Heck, Obama did not identify the donors of $280 million to his Presidential campaign. That’s the best place to start investigating.
Obama said the Chanber of Commerce is a “threat to democracy.”
Joe McCarthy lives.
Posted by: drjohn | October 12, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am
I’m certain that with the shady things Axelrod has been saying, he’s been cheating on his wife. It’s up to him to come forward and disclose where he goes every night and every phone call he makes, so he can prove that he’s not a cheating scumbag.
This game is fun!
Posted by: Dave | October 12, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am
The great Obama/Pelosi team. They have quadrupled the budget deficit already, and by the end his fiscal year he will increase it by 600%. The national debt is $11.5 Trillion and he has already committed to programs that will increase it to over $20 trillion. This country is bankrupt and doesn’t realize it. The interest on $20 trillion at 6% is $1.2 trillion a year, at 8% is $1.6 trillion a year. Entitlements are $1.5 trillion a year. Add the interest on the national debt and the entitlements that the government pay and you exceed the revenue that this country brings in a year, which is approximately $2.5 trillion. Where are your going to get the money to run the government, provide for national defense, etc. You are bankrupt already. No one will loan you money, you are a bad risk, worse that a 3rd world country. The only thing that is left is to print it, and when that happens you will devalue money and experience run away inflation, just like Mexico, or worse. Your savings will become worthless, everything will come to a stop and you will enter into a depression like this country has never seen, people will be starving, people will be homeless. You think I am kidding, take a look at Germany after the war and you will see what is in store for you. You have elected an elitist socialist Marxist as your president and he is surrounding himself with his puppets. He is the most dangerous man in the world. Welcome to Obama’s hope and change.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:54 am 11:54 am
As a good faith starting point Axelrod and the President could release the source of the millions of dollars in contributions to their 2008 campaign that has long been questioned and unreported. Someone as slimy as Axelrod should not be allowed near the White House.
Posted by: Bobothree | October 12, 2010, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Let’s see, what could have gone wrong, total lack of transparency, numerous lies, apologizing to anyone who would listen, unaccountable Czars, government takeover of automobile industry, abject favoritism toward unions, security issues, terrorist trials in NYC, ACORN, Eric Holder’s incompetence, attempted takeover of healthcare system despite wishes of the citizens, and a total narcissitic attitude for one year. Failure to take responsibility for own actions, blaming Bush/Chaney at every turn.
Can’t imagine why the wheels are coming off.
Perhaps it boils down to the fact that deep down people do not trust or respect a liar.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Let’s see, what could have gone wrong, total lack of transparency, numerous lies, apologizing to anyone who would listen, unaccountable Czars, government takeover of automobile industry, abject favoritism toward unions, security issues, terrorist trials in NYC, ACORN, Eric Holder’s incompetence, attempted takeover of healthcare system despite wishes of the citizens, and a total narcissitic attitude for one year. Failure to take responsibility for own actions, blaming Bush/Chaney at every turn.
Can’t imagine why the wheels are coming off.
Perhaps it boils down to the fact that deep down people do not trust or respect a liar.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Since before the election there was a lawsuit to stop him from being inaugurated. Many lawsuits since. Our judcial officials we presume are all being threatened not to hear these cases.
AKA also has forged SS numbers and is currently using one now different from the one he used as senator. This is proof from several investigators who swore to it. His draft card has also been proven to be fraud.
A military LTC. Lakin has challenged AKA and is not being given a fair trial according to our constitution. He is being held and may go to prision because AKA won’t make any personal known. The American people have a right to know if POTUS is ir us not legitimate. 65% of us now know that he is imposter. Be aware of treaties and documents signed by him!!
His father’s foreign citizenship makes him ineligible, even if he had been born in the Lincoln Bedroom of the White House. He may have been born in Hawaii, it wouldn’t make any differencce.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
I’ll show you mine if you show me yours Axelrod……Sheeezzz…That all you got, EMPTY WORDS….You guys REALLY ARE DESPERATE…Thankfully the voters this time around are not falling for it…….
Posted by: Parallex View | October 12, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Wow, ABC asks where’s the birth certificate? Why the interest after two+ years?
Few people realize that even if he was born in Honolulu, he is still not elligible as a “natural born” citizen because his father was not a U.S. Citizen. Being born on U.S. soil is not enough for elligibility.
Too bad the news media didn’t give a crap about this back when it could have done some good.
Posted by: Vince Fostersghost | October 12, 2010, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
No way! ABC asks where’s the birth certificate? The wheels really are coming off the bus. That’s it Jake, no more interviews for you.
Posted by: Bill | October 12, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
The Chamber of Commerce, aka the White Citizens Council, brings in millions of dollars from foreign sources, in places like Bahrain and India, in dues payments alone. Alot of attention in the press gets focused on the ‘AmChams’ abroad, but that money, from places like Russia and Egypt, is only a small fraction of the foreign money the Chamber brings into American politics. Direct donations by foreign based multinationals like BP and Siemens are by far the largest source of the Chamber’s foreign money.
Posted by: Flash Override | October 12, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
There is no question of “proving a negative” here, and to say so is to purposely mislead your readers.
Despite the Chamber’s “non-denial denials”, he following facts have not been refuted:
1) The Chamber acknowledges that it receives foreign sources of funding.
2) The foreign funds go directly into the Chamber’s general 501(c)(6) entity.
3) At least $300,000 has been channeled from foreign companies in India and Bahrain to the account.
4) The foreign sources include foreign state-owned companies, including the State Bank of India and the Bahrain Petroleum Company.
5) The Chamber’s 501(c)(6) entity is used to launch an unprecedented $75 million partisan attack ad campaign against Democrats.
Posted by: Flash Override | October 12, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Axelrod just admitted that his illegal alien administration doesn’t want transparency, but requires it of everyone else! Doh.
Posted by: Schmoe | October 12, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Axelrod’s pathetic.. If he’s making these charges then he needs to provide the proof!~! He’s the one hiding. Please pny up the donor list from Obama Campaign and show the chamber your good faith. Ha Ha Ha
Posted by: Kala | October 12, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
No mention of the international unions who recieve large chunks of their dues from foreign countries and plan to spend 2-3 times what the Chamber of Commerce is spending to promote socialism in the US! Flash Overdrive…nice race baiting and make believe “facts”. The Chamber of Commerce does recieve foreign money which is kept in a seperate account and not used for political purposes but dont let facts get in the way of your delusions.
Posted by: Cujat13 | October 12, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
I can think of one reason why the Chamber may not want to disclose…partisan hacks take that information and pillory corporations or an organizations or individuals that may have contributed. We’ve see that here in Minnesota when Democrats and “whack-job” activists proposed boycotting Target stores because Target gave a donation to support Emmer for Gov of Minnesota.
Posted by: rick | October 12, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Huh and a ha ha ha. Axelrod is another fraud that needs to be kicked out of our great country along with Obammy boy. Did ya’all notice how he skirted the long form birth certificate issue? Same issue he is trying to raise, yet they, the liberal democrats, think they can do it and get away with it. I just love watching them run around like chickens with their heads cut off.
Posted by: patrick | October 12, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
There are many serious questions about Mr. Obama’s background. Some day the truth will emerge. I’m betting that it will cause a constitutional crisis.
Posted by: Wintoon | October 12, 2010, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
Tapper: Will you release the long for birth certificate?
Axlrod: (ignores the question) The Chamber should release their info.
….priceless! What’s Obama hiding?
Posted by: JustAGuy | October 12, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I don’t understand how the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wouldn’t want to be honest about its large contributors?
It is scary that since the recent Supreme Court decision on the subject, corporations, even foreign ones, will be able to influence our elections. The idea that a huge corporation, whether ours or international, should be free to determine who is elected to make our laws is criminal.
Posted by: Lydia | October 12, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Lydia, why are you accusing the US Chamber of Commerse of dishonesty? What have they done that is dishonest?
Posted by: JustAGuy | October 12, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
This entire fiasco is a Straw Man and a Red Herring to keep the focus OFF this administrations miserable performance during their almost 2 MISERABLE years in office. Millions of people are unemployed and over 40 MILLION ARE ON FOODSTAMPS while they have pushed ObamaCare and Cap and Tax and Card Check!! They have WASTED a couple TRILLION dollars on wealth redistribution instead of focusing on JOBS AND THE ECONOMY. They are going to pay, big time, in 3 weeks!! The Tsunami is coming!
Posted by: Sunnyr | October 12, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
The New York Times, Washington Post, CNBC, and FactCheck.org have now all DEBUNKED Think Progress’ claims. Liberals and Progressives, as usual, have made total fools of themselves. But hey, if they bought empty rhetoric like “Hope and Change”, they’ll buy anything.
Posted by: Mary | October 12, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
It would be nice if those mentioning McCarthyism had a clue that Sen Joe McCarthy was working with a list developed by the FBI, which was substantiated by our government on July 30, 1953, when it published a report entitled Interlocking Subversion In Government Departments.
However, media subversives like Arthur Miller and Richard Rovere ran a smear campaign which was much more successful than Sen Joe’s efforts to rid our government of subversives like those who populate the current administration.
Posted by: Spike | October 12, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
If you think the MSM looks bad now wait until Obama’s birth certificate issue goes to court and it will be acknowledged that they covered for him. Then the American people will be rid of the so called MSM, the Democrat Party and Obama and his minions
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Way to dodge the question about the long-form birth certificate, Axelnimrod.
Posted by: Dave | October 12, 2010, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
When he took a huge spending bill under the guise of stimulus and used it to pay off organizations, unions and individuals that got him elected,
People said it didn’t matter.
When he took over insurance companies, car companies, banks, etc.,
People said it didn’t matter.
When he took away student loans from the banks and put them through the government,
People said it didn’t matter.
When he designed plans to take over the health care system and put it under government control,
People said it didn’t matter.
When he set into motion a plan to take over the control of all energy in the United States through Cap and Trade,
People said it didn’t matter.
When he finally completed his transformation of America into a Socialist State , people finally woke up……… but it was too late
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Jake, you should have pressed him further about the birth certificate.
When Robert Gibbs was asked about it by the WND reporter in a WH Press Briefing, the video shows you leaving that briefing and I don’t recall you writing about it.
What is Obama hiding and why?
Posted by: Juan | October 12, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Obama and his minions are liars.There is no point listening to anything they say.
Posted by: tex02 | October 12, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
When you see WAPO, The Times, The Globe, The Inquirer(Phila), The Sun actually calling this Axel-Bama charge absurd and in fact, it is Dems who not only get more special interest donations but foreign ones too. What horrors these lying socialists are. Odd that they go back to the old smear,lie, vote cheating playbook when they have no policies or issues on which to campaign.Time to sweep these Dems out in local, state Leg., guv as well as Congressional races. They just cannot be trusted. BTW,did not the rats leave this Bama ship: Rahm, Axel, Jones, Orzag et al. Why is that???
Posted by: Glenn Koons | October 12, 2010, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
BTW, for 17 years, as a college teacher and pastor in my community, I was in the local chamber and found it not to be either party’s horse. But, I did find that business people, small ones in great numbers, wanted less taxes, spending, and regs to give products, customers better deals. Dems apparently do not believe in this. And as far as endorsements,I would rather see the US Chamber be behind candidates and values than George Soros, a leftist thug.
Posted by: Glenn Koons | October 12, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Read The Obama Timeline. It has all the evidence needed to deport the thug-in-chief to Indonesia.
Posted by: Colony 14 | October 12, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Maybe its 2 years out but the truth about this imposter is about to hit the fan. To read about it on ABC website just blows my mind. Is Mr. Tapper about to get fired? This should be headlined tonight and every night until the long form birth certificate is out. The november elections are now an afterthought with over 100 seats in the house ready to flip and the senate turning 52-48 republican if he doesnt come up with the long form. Even if he does it going to be a bloodbath. On an ABC website no less.
Posted by: Nicknack | October 12, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
If Obama is so worried about transparency, why not reveal the sources of all of his campaign contributions? It’s not REQUIRED, but he didn’t reveal as much information as the McCain campaign did.
Posted by: lightduty | October 12, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Hey flash overice, where did obama get the 40 million that he never accouned for in his election bid, was it Saudi money????? Sure looked like it after he bowed to the King right????
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Cujat13,
You are mistaken regarding the amount of union spending. The amount that the Chamber is spending is much more, and business spends ten times what unions do. Get your facts straight.
The Chamber admitted that it takes in foreign money, and admitted that it goes into the fund that pays for the political ads. Get your facts straight. They claim that they have unspecified “controls” that insure foreign money isn’t used, but refuse to state how.
The Chamber of Commerce represents the oil industry, the finance industry, and real estate interests. While many small businesses my join, they in fact represent the economic elite. They are a very radical right wing organization.
Posted by: Flash Override | October 12, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Flash Override-Answer my question or go somewhere else and do your spin- WHERE DID OBAMA GET THE 40 MILLION THAT HE DID NOT ACCOUNT FOR? and no lying or spin and how many muslim countries gave how much to him??????
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
I don’t care where the Chamber got the money. I care that numerous muslim and communist countries gave to obama in 2008, that is what matters to most American’s!!!!!!!!! Having this debate is backfiring on the dems as they are caught being hypocritical as usual!!!!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 12, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
The Obama campaign purposefully turned off the credit card verification features on their campaign contribution website. They also did not require proof of citizenship from foreign addresses. They took in $200M in undisclosed contributions. There is only one reason why they would do these things: to thwart the discovery of illegal contributions.
Axelrod is incredible–as in NOT credible. His boss is even less believable. The time will come when we learn all there is to know about this fraud.
Posted by: PD Quig | October 12, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Flash,
Now who’s the one lying? The chamber never said their foreign membership dues are used for campaign purposes. They said the exact opposite, actually, in their editorial in the NYTimes on 10/6/10.
Posted by: Beggin4Scraps | October 12, 2010, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
You are mistaken regarding the amount of union spending. The amount that the Chamber is spending is much more, and business spends ten times what unions do. Get your facts straight.
The Chamber admitted that it takes in foreign money, and admitted that it goes into the fund that pays for the political ads. Get your facts straight. They claim that they have unspecified “controls” that insure foreign money isn’t used, but refuse to state how.
The Chamber of Commerce represents the oil industry, the finance industry, and real estate interests. While many small businesses my join, they in fact represent the economic elite. They are a very radical right wing organization.
Posted by: Flash Override | Oct 12, 2010 4:19:45 PM
Exactly.
For the rest of the confused commenters here, see Greg Sargent, “How about some fact-checks of Karl Rove’s and right’s falsehoods?” : “Karl Rove, who co-founded two big spending groups, and others behind the huge conservative ad buys, have repeatedly claimed in recent days that their spending is comparable to anonymous spending from the left. These claims are serious distortions at best and demonstrable falsehoods at worst. But no one seems to care.”
Why don’t you care, Jake? ABC? Right wingers?
Posted by: progressive mama | October 12, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
These people wouldn’t believe the President was born in the USA even if the entire birth was on tape!! This is so crazy it is sad. He’s President, get over it and start helping the country move forward or get out way.
“The United States of Idiocracy”.
Posted by: PJ | October 12, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
“Don’t forget that he has used 16 Social Security numbers, including 042-68-4425 (Google it!), the one he gets paid with in the White House, which was issued to a man born in Connecticut in 1890!”
ROFLMAO!
Research done by two quacks (one of whom was drummed out Scotland yard) using public databases with GIANT DISCLAIMERS stating that the information contained may not be accurate!
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 12, 2010, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
“Joe McCarthy lives.”
He certainly does. Got a show on at 5 on FoxNews.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 12, 2010, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
“Dr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm”
The real polarik
Loren Collins: “His trade is in statistics and surveys. He has no degrees relating to computers or technology. He is not a computer expert; he has used computers. He is not a scanner expert; he has used scanners. At best, he is an amateur photography buff. He may have a doctorate, true, but it is in a field wholly unrelated to computer technology. Just see Florida State University’s program profile. Even had he signed his real name to his ‘XXXXXXXXX’ declaration, he still would not have qualified as an expert in the field in which he was attempting to provide expert testimony. Polland would never survive a Daubert challenge, and any lawyer would be foolish to attempt to pass him off as an expert on these matters.”
Or if its your bag, Polarik offers himself up as some sort of sex guru to teach you right wingers the secrets of seducing women (before his time as a document expert)
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 12, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
A military LTC. Lakin has challenged AKA and is not being given a fair trial according to our constitution.”
No he openly declared he would miss a movement after being ordered to Afghanistan. Then he missed the movement. Poor man must have had some birther chewing his ear pretty hard because only now that has he realized the idiocy of trying to call Obama illegitimate and that he would have “standing” and get “discovery” (the birther holy grail). So he has dumped his birth lawyers in favor or reputable military council.
I imagine they will attempt to spare the man jail time.
The birther lawyer gets his money though.
“He is being held and may go to prision because AKA won’t make any personal known.”
He currently has desk duty at Walter Reed though he certainly may go to prison if found guilty.
Obama could show up tomorrow in court with a video of his birth, birth certificate even his kindergarten records and it would not matter at all as he is not relevant to the proceedings as to whether Lakin missed a movement.
One can read Judge Lind’s ruling and get that.
Birthers not so much.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 12, 2010, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Good grief Tapper! You had this piece of dirt, Axelrod, pinned down on the Long Form Birth Certificate (which is under Presidential executive orders to hide it) and you let him squirm out of a direct answer right at the end! What gives?
Just when I was going to stop refering to ABC News as America-Bashing-Communist News.
Posted by: Scott | October 12, 2010, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
There is a rumor going around that 0bama is taking antidepressants.
Posted by: BlackSunshine84 | October 12, 2010, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
I would prefer that only individuals, not corporations be able to give political contributions, but no matter who gives to the Republicans, I support the Republicans because I support less government, decency and more free enterprise. And I want to see the long form!
Posted by: YM | October 12, 2010, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
There is an executive order blocking Obama’s birth certificate? good grief what a joke.
Are you people all going to PUBLICLY APOLOGIZE when it is finally revealed Obama WAS born in Kenya?
I hope you have the integrity to do it, but I doubt it, as marxist progressives generally dont. they’re anti-Americans who disdain the Constitution.
I am sick of you people’s lack of intellect.
Posted by: John H | October 12, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
TAPPER: Isn’t that like the whackjobs that tell the president he needs to show them his full long-form birth certificate so he can put to rest the questions that have been raised?
AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.
TAPPER: The long form?
—-
So, Tapper–does this make you a “whackjob”? Why the pejorative for people who ask the same question you just did?
Posted by: DC | October 12, 2010, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Hey Axelrod, answer the question! The long-form birth certificate – where is it? It’s nowhere. The COLB on factcheck is a Photoshop fabrication of your own making. It’s a fake! Way to go Jake Tapper, you asked the most important question that exists today. Why aren’t more of your colleagues asking this question? There is no other question that has more importance than this. If Obama can’t prove he is a “natural born Citizen” then we must all assume he is a fraud and not the President.
Posted by: Lord Goo Goo | October 12, 2010, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Somehow the U.S. Chamber of Commerce taking foreign money for anything doesn’t sound right. They are supposed to be advancing U.S. businesses but foreign corporations give them money to do this… why would they unless they are advancing their foreign interests?
Something doesn’t sound right… the U.S. Chamber of Commerce should tell who their big donors are immediately.
Isn’t it telling that Repubs blocked legislation to force the disclosure of where funds come from that pay for political ads?
Posted by: Lydia | October 12, 2010, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Lydia wrote:”Isn’t it telling that Repubs blocked legislation to force the disclosure of where funds come from that pay for political ads?”
.
Its even more telling that DEMOCRATS have nothing else to run on. Debt, deficit, out of control spending, corruption, oBama’s pathetic poor performance, double-digit unemployment, etc. Who wouldn’t want to change the subject when you can’t even begin to defend the indefensible.
Posted by: gk | October 12, 2010, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
What a degenerate. Hey Dave, show us the standard 1961 NVSD “Certificate of Live Birth” for Obama and we’ll tell you where all the money is coming from that is going to be used to throw you out of the White House. And, hey, Tapper, the next time you have another weasel from the Obama White House cornered, don’t just let him off the hook…wimp!
Posted by: penjo | October 12, 2010, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
gk, anyone who was conscious at the end of Bush’s last term remembers that is when the economy collapsed.
No sane person could expect the disaster Bush and Republican policies left to be fixed in less than two years. Of course, the economic mess plus two wars would leave us in a deficit situation.
Anyone reading world news see that the banking mess Repubs allowed has affected countries’ economies around the world?
If we learn anything from the economic collapse, it should be that the banking industry should be closely regulated forever, as their greed can take us all down.
Posted by: Lydia | October 13, 2010, 1:40 am 1:40 am
It is kind of funny and sad, that those comments mentioning that Obama’s campaign had ‘mystery’ money sources quote the total at $40 million, $100 million and $400 million. Something tells me these folks are not finding their info at credible sources!
Posted by: Lydia | October 13, 2010, 1:43 am 1:43 am
It is hilarious and puzzling that the birth certificate question keeps coming up. Folks, the officials from Hawaii have confirmed that his birth certificate is legit and on file there, so has factcheck.org (an unbiased organization)as well as other officials.
Get over it, we have a black President!
Posted by: Lydia | October 13, 2010, 2:08 am 2:08 am
If Axelrod is so eager for disclosure why doesn’t he start with his boss and disclose where the special interests groups that donated to his campaign got all their money from.
Posted by: Mark Allen | October 13, 2010, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Thank goodness that Obama & Congress passed a spending bill that kept another Great Depression at bay.
Thank goodness that they also passed a health care reform bill as 45,000 Americans die each year because they can’t afford it, premiums were rising faster each year with less benefits.
Thank goodness they kept the banks from going under, which would have further ruined the economy, by giving them loans they have almost totally paid back.
Thank goodness they helped bail out hte car companies, saving huge numbers of jobs directly and indirectly.
Thank goodness they stopped banks being middlemen for student loans from the government and price-gouging students.
Thank goodness that we have an administration that is looking out for middle-income and the poor and the small businessmen, as we are in sore need of help after 8 years of a presidency that was all about helping the rich and the big corporations.
Posted by: Lydia | October 13, 2010, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Hey Axelrod you putz…he asked you a question.
“The long form?”
Posted by: JudgeMental | October 13, 2010, 2:34 am 2:34 am
Oh Lydia, you sound like a parody – that’s what I actually thought you were at first! But you are serious! Holy gullibility, Batman, we have a moonbat on our hands!
Posted by: Anniee451 | October 13, 2010, 4:42 am 4:42 am
Answer the question, Dave! Where’s the standard, 1961 long form U.S. Certificate of Live Birth containing the signature of the attending physician and the name of the hospital? Its a simple question that virtually every other American can answer. Obama either has one, or he doesn’t, and propping Hawaii’s independently published fake cover document as a legitimate birth certificate is only insulting us now. Your lie doesn’t cut it. Sorry. Nothing complicated about it. What was the name of Obama’s birth doctor, and what was the name and location of the facility of his birth! Answer the question.
Answer the Question.
Answer the question.
Answer the question.
Answer the question.
Posted by: penjo | October 13, 2010, 4:51 am 4:51 am
Obama’s short form birth certificate does not fit the official story of birth in the Kapiolani Hospital. The Date Filed indicates August 8, 1961 and the registration number is 10641.
When it is compared with long form birth certificates for Nordyke twins (born in the Kapiolani on August 5, 1961, registration numbers 10637 and 10638) it is easy to spot the problem – Obama’s registration number is higher than Nordykes’ numbers even though his registration was processed three days earlier.
Registration numbers were assigned in the Department of Health office. Nordyke certificates were processed on August 11, 1961. Therefore Obama’s registration number could not have been assigned on August 8.
At that time hospitals reported birth registrations weekly – Kapiolani did it on Fridays. Had Obama been born in the Kapiolani hospital his birth certificate would have been processed on August 11.
Most likely his birth was registered as an unattended birth on August 8, 1961 (by grandmother) and there was not enough evidence to register birth at the time – this was probably done much later on. Registration number 10641 most likely belongs to somebody else.
Hawaii Department of Health refuses to publish birth index data in case when the registration number 10641 is included in the request.
Where is the Long Form birth certificate that would indicate Kapiolani as Obama’s birthplace?
Posted by: nc1 | October 13, 2010, 5:07 am 5:07 am
Lydia, just because someone says that Obama has a valid birth certificate you believe them. problem is that will NOT stand up in court! Besides obama admitted his father was a British Subject which makes obama native born NOT Natural born like the constitution says. So, you lost this one!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 7:52 am 7:52 am
Lydia, a agree totally that the banking industry needs to be regulated.
For years, Republicans raised red flags about Fannie and Freddie’s financial condition and proposed responsible reforms only to be thwarted by Democrats who have deep political ties to the worst offenders. These same powerful Democrats are now pushing for a financial reform bill that doesn’t even address the need to fix these government mortgage companies. As the Wall Street Journal wrote last week, “reforming the financial system without fixing Fannie and Freddie is like declaring a war on terror and ignoring al Qaeda.”
Because of the coverup by dems like Frank, Dodd and even obama himself, the economy collasped!
ps-factcheck.org is a biased liberal site run by the Annenberg company!
Must be nice to live in your liberal world where rationality means nada!!!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 7:57 am 7:57 am
The White House has maintained a computer-generated Certification of Live Birth, or COLB, is proof enough of Obama’s Hawaiian birth, even though it has no hospital or doctor’s name on it. Such documents differ from a Certificate of Live Birth which includes those details. In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of Obama’s short-form COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org.
No controlling legal authority has ever directly addressed the question of whether Obama met the U.S. Constitution’s requirements to be president. The Constitution requires that the president be 35 years of age, a resident for at least 14 years and a “natural born citizen.”
To date, President Obama has still not provided simple, incontrovertible proof of his exact birthplace. That information would be included on his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, which Obama has steadfastly refused to release amid a flurry of conflicting reports.
He has only proffered on the Internet a “Certification of Live Birth” to assert he was born in Hawaii, but that document was available to children not born in Hawaii at the time of Obama’s birth. Many people remain unaware a child could be born somewhere else and still receive a Hawaii certification. State law specifically allows “an adult or the legal parents of a minor child” to apply to the health department and, upon unspecified proof, be given the birth document.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 8:08 am 8:08 am
Most Presidents are proud of papers, essays, and themes they wrote before any books or attaining office. And yet this ‘so called’ constitutional scholar intentionally withholds all of his writings and much of his Illinois records. We have no proof of his constitutional scholarship. What did he write about as President of the Harvard Law School paper? Yes, hiding/withholding is his right; but, one can only wonder what it is he is hiding.
Posted by: deanbob | October 13, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am
The reason why Obama does not want to release the long form is the same reason why he won’t release his health records,his travel records and his education records.To do so would reveal the truth about Barack Obama,not some media created myth.The plain fact is that Obama has benefited from affirmative action his entire life with few if any real accomplishments due to his own efforts.The education records would show that he was a mediocre student at best; one just has to read between the lines of what little he has released.Unfortunately every day reveals how limited his intellect really is and how woefully unprepared he is for his job.Lydia, even Obama”s former economics guru Roemer admitted the stimulus failed.
Posted by: Nephron | October 13, 2010, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Mr. Tapper, finally a reporter with some cajones! Keep digging as this is a very volatile issue with a huge following as the public knows we are being lied to by the administration!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Why does a simple question asked of the president make one a “whackjob?” Many people would like to see our Commander in Chief’s full birth certificate. What is he hiding and why does someone supposedly born in Hawaii have a social security # originated in Connecticut?
Posted by: B_Madoff | October 13, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Lydia said we aren’t getting information on Obama’s mysterious compaign contributions from reputable sources. I always thought the AP was considered reputable. Oh, well. I guess Lydia only thinks Jon Stewart and Colbert are reputable.
Posted by: Skye | October 13, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
So anyone who questions Obama’s long form birth certificate which has yet to be produced is a “whack-job”? I find that offensive. We citizens have a right to know if this Manchurian candidate we know nothing about has a right to that Oval Office. He has spent millions keeping his BC private. Why? How did he go to Pakistan in 1981 when US citizens were not permitted to go there? Where is the lame-stream media on such obvious breaches of our laws and yet none seem to care about the facts .Where is any info on this man? No president in history has kept so much of his past secret. I submit he is illegal and therefore should be impeached and removed from office.
Posted by: richard terrell | October 13, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
.The plain fact is that Obama has benefited from affirmative action his entire life with few if any real accomplishments due to his own efforts”
And Nephie’s only evidence of this is Obama’s skin color.
He also ignores Obama graduating from Columbia and then Harvard, graduated magna cum laude from Harvard (roughly top 11% of class).
Birthers are much more worried about Obama’s skin color than his paperwork.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
“How did he go to Pakistan in 1981 when US citizens were not permitted to go there?”
Like many elements of the birther fable, this one is simply made up.
There has never been a travel ban to Pakistan.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
I remember when the MSM hounded Bush for his National Guard records, I would think a Birth Certificate would be much more important! We will remember in November who is doing their job in the MSM and Mr. Tapper you are the only one! But why stop now!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
.”Many people remain unaware a child could be born somewhere else and still receive a Hawaii certification.”
Not quite but its a common birther mistake/intentional misreading.
Starting in 1982 one could apply for a Hawaiian Birth Certificate except the certificate would indicate where one was born.
So if you applied for a Certificate and you were from Topeka, Kansas, your birth certificate would say Topeka Kansas as your birth place.
The birth supposition that anyone born anywhere could simply apply for a birth certificate saying they were born in Hawaii is pretty dumb…even for them.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
The birth certificate posted by the Obama campaign is the short form. If you were to use this form to try and get a driver’s license in Hawaii, you would be denied. It’s not good enough to get you a drivers license, but it’s good enough to qualify you to be president. Show it already! What are you hiding?
Posted by: Jeff | October 13, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
0bama’s admin. wants the list so they know who to harass. IRS, DOJ, etc.
Meanwhile, 0bama has been the least transparent pres. in history – hiding, unprecedentedly, his campaign donor lists, his med. records, his college transcripts, etc.
This blew up in your face, 0.
Posted by: Maria | October 13, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
“It’s not proving a negative, Jake, because all you have to do to clear up the questions is reveal the birth certificate. The question back to the White House is why don’t they want to reveal the original birth certificate that shows specically where Barack Obama was born and the name of the attending physician?”
Posted by: LDMartin1959 | October 13, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
“The White House has maintained a computer-generated Certification of Live Birth, or COLB, is proof enough of Obama’s Hawaiian birth, even though it has no hospital or doctor’s name on it.”
That has been Hawaii’s official birth certificate since it went to electronic records in 2001. It is considered prima facie evidence of birth.
Perhaps posting on the internet was too public for you and you would like for Obama to hand deliver a copy?
But here’s more from Hawaiian officials.
Ap:State officials say there’s no doubt Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said Friday she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate”
“Director of Hawaii Health Record:“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.””
Gov Lingle (R):”You know, during the campaign of 2008, I was actually in the mainland campaigning for Sen. McCain. This issue kept coming up so much in the campaign, and again I think it’s one of those issues that is simply a distraction from the more critical issues that are facing the country. And so I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that’s just a fact. And yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue. And I think it’s, again, a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this. … It’s been established. He was born here.”
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
“The birth certificate posted by the Obama campaign is the short form. If you were to use this form to try and get a driver’s license in Hawaii, you would be denied”
This is a common birther lie.
The COLB is hawaii’s official birth certificate and has been since 2001.
Its acceptable for driver’s license’s and passports.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
The birth certificate posted by the Obama campaign is the short form. If you were to use this form to try and get a driver’s license in Hawaii, you would be denied. It’s not good enough to get you a drivers license, but it’s good enough to qualify you to be president. Show it already! What are you hiding?
Posted by: Dr. Bruce | October 13, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
To date, President Obama has still not provided simple, incontrovertible proof of his exact birthplace. That information would be included on his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, which Obama has steadfastly refused to release amid a flurry of conflicting reports.
Posted by: Dr. Bruce | October 13, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Was Obama born in 1961? Or 2001?
Posted by: Dr. Bruce | October 13, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Let me get this straight Ryan C., since 1982 Hawaii doesn’t allow people born out of state to get the Hawaiian Short Form. Uh, what does this have to do with BHO who’s short form was prior to 1982. Looks like Ryan C., another apparently media addled BHO apologist, flames out and falls to earth.
What I am more interested in is the Occidental University records. Did BHO or did he not go to Occidental on a foreign student scholarship. If he is a naturally born citizen, that would be criminal fraud. The only situations where that would not be a crime is if he was: 1. not a natural born citizen, or 2. renounced his U.S. citizenship. To answer these questions we need to see those Occidental transcripts and enrollment records, right Ryan?
Posted by: Snitch-in-Time | October 13, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
…of course you have heard Axelrod on the tv political shows….he is the guy who “ums” and “ohs” his way through his sentences in reply to a tough question. The sure sign of a bull tosser is always one who “ummmmms” and “ohhhs” when he talks.
Posted by: justj joey | October 13, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
“Let me get this straight Ryan C., since 1982 Hawaii doesn’t allow people born out of state to get the Hawaiian Short Form.”
No.
Since 1982, if you were born out of state from Hawaii you could get a Hawaiian birth certificate.
However this would say where you were born and not magically make you born in Hawaii.
“Did BHO or did he not go to Occidental on a foreign student scholarship.”
ROFLMAO!
You do know that was an April Fool’s Joke right?
Look it up on Snopes.
Its amazing what birthers will dismiss (official records, statement by officials, contemporaneous newspapers accounts, pictures, roommate accounts etc) but will swallow whole hog ANYTHING then demand it be proven wrong and even when proven wrong will still merrily repeat the lie over and over again.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
To date, President Obama has still not provided simple, incontrovertible proof of his exact birthplace. That information would be included on his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, which Obama has steadfastly refused to release amid a flurry of conflicting reports.
Copied a few times because nobody will answer Why? I thought he was “transparent” and a “uniter”. Admit it, he’s hiding something.
Posted by: Dr. Bruce | October 13, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
A quick check of the Snopes article shows that a particular email was a hoax. Snopes has a somewhat sordid history of trafficking in credibility gained in other areas to prop up beleaguered left-wing pols. Good old Barbara “the Snope” M. is, after all, just another run of the mill left wing apologist. I know because I have locked horns with her in the past.
Posted by: Snitch-in-Time | October 13, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
“A quick check of the Snopes article shows that a particular email was a hoax.”
With basic research, you will find that nearly everything that makes up the birther cannon is misunderstodd, misread, distorted and sometimes just plain made up.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Been fun, so long Ryan, and thanks for all the laughs.
Posted by: Snitch-in-Time | October 13, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
“It is tragic and sad to watch guys like you stubbornly cling to their pretended superiority and their imagined brilliance.”
Birthers hate it when you shatter their hopes of finally outsmarting someone with secret knowledge.
But I hate to break it to you, the knowledge is neither secret not is it knowledge.
Its made up nonsense that you have bought hook line & sinker so you will lose everything single birther argument that you have with some remotely aware of the facts.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I am not the same person as Jeff. But, we’re both thinking the same thing, and it’s clear enough and well-worded:
To date, President Obama has still not provided simple, incontrovertible proof of his exact birthplace. That information would be included on his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, which Obama has steadfastly refused to release amid a flurry of conflicting reports.
Why? I thought he was “transparent” and a “uniter”. Admit it, he’s hiding something.
Posted by: Dr. Bruce | October 13, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
“I am not the same person as Jeff. But, we’re both thinking the same thing, and it’s clear enough and well-worded:”
ROFLMAO!
Like I said, right wing spam monkey.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
WHERE Obama was born is of no consequence. By his own admission, Barak is a dual citizen which is not a “natural born” citizen (of two American parents). This disqualifies Obama from legitimately holding office. The problem is that, because he is half-black, the Congress, nor the courts will enforce his removal from office.
Posted by: Jason | October 13, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
“WHERE Obama was born is of no consequence. By his own admission, Barak is a dual citizen which is not a “natural born” citizen (of two American parents).”
Natural born citizenship simply means citizenship when one is born. It is used interchangeably with native born citizen.
Obama is a citizen by virtue of his birth place whereas John McCain was a citizen by virtue of his parents.
Both are natural born citizens as was Mitt’s Romney’s father who was born in Mexico to parents from the United States, as was Bill Richardson who was born in the United States but his mother was not a citizen.
There are only two classes of citizen in the United States those born citizens and those who become naturalized citizens.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Obviously BHO is hiding something.
He has spent millions of dollars to prevent disclosure of his real birth certificate, instead, hiding behind his computer generated COLB available to anyone who was breathing, regardless of age and birth location.
Unfortunately that is not the only skeleton in BHO’s closet. Based upon translation accounts of his direct relatives in Kenya stating that they were present at his birth in Kenya.
He also attended muslim schools in Indonesia as a child after he changed his name and citizenship status to be an Indonesian, secondary to his mothers new marriage.
He continues this citizenship status, thus enabling his travels to Pakistan as a young adult. These travels Did Occur at a time when American citizens were forbidden to travel to Pakistan. Tell me how did a boy born in Hawaii get into Pakistan at that time?
Also, there seems to be some starnge reason that BHO was issued a Social Security number for someone who lived in Conneticut. When did he ever hold residence there at the time it was siisued?
I do not know the answers. What I do know is that there are MANY inconsistencies in the BHO timeline, combined with BHO’s obvious attempts to hide the truth. Umm, lack of transparency?
I was humored by Axlerods morose attempt at evading the last question above.
Classic BHO, change the subject and blame someone else.
Thanks BO you’ve had your ride. Now it’s time for the end of your ride.
Enough is enough. Remember, your BO is not synonymous with BS or is it?
Posted by: phillr | October 13, 2010, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Well The AXE said it all when he avoided directly answering about Yobama’s long form birth certificate.
That’s the real story – ABC GO DIG FOR IT!
Posted by: Cottereaux | October 13, 2010, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
“These travels Did Occur at a time when American citizens were forbidden to travel to Pakistan.”
There has never been travel ban to Pakistan.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
“Before the Constitution the closest reference we have to Natural Born Citizen is from the legal treatise “the Law of Nations,” written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19,”
Except for the fact that the English translation did not become available until after the Constitution had been adopted.
Blackstone was much more heavily relied upon than Vattel.
I would try Obama’s Conspiracy Theories, a website that debunks much of the birther nonsense.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
“He also attended muslim schools in Indonesia as a child after he changed his name and citizenship status to be an Indonesian, secondary to his mothers new marriage.”
Huh?
Obama went to a public school, that Insight Magazine nonsense was the first right wing lie debunked about Obama.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
In Case you folks don’t know it but Snopes is run by right wingers so I won’t believe anything they have to say.
Posted by: Rob | October 13, 2010, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
In Case you folks don’t know it but Snopes is run by left wingers so I won’t believe anything they have to say.
Oops I had said right wingers but meant the left.
Posted by: Rob | October 13, 2010, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
“In Case you folks don’t know it but Snopes is run by left wingers so I won’t believe anything they have to say.”
ROFLMAO!
So continue to believe a obvious April Fool’s hoax!
The right wing has gone from anti-intellectual to full on embrace the stupid.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 13, 2010, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Forget it Jake. You’ll never get a straight answer out of this guy who is a representation of what this destructive administration is all about. obama will go down in history as the most destructive and divisive person to have ever sat in the wh.
Posted by: Gina | October 13, 2010, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Ryan C, if all you say is true then why has obama spent close to two million dollars keeping his birth certificate hidden? Looks to me like he is hiding something. T
Also the site you mentioned below attempts to spin the facts but the American people are on to you and your lies!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Ryan C, you are wrong as always, batting 0 like your hero! Below is a refernce about Vattel and how the founding father’s refered to him.
Also Ryan my boy, if you are so sure of yourself then you should be begging obama to take this to court to prove you right! But he won’t and he now has our Justice Dept doing his dirty work for him at our expense.
Ryan, We know that AKA claims he was a dual citizen at birth, of both U.S. and British citizenship which became Kenyan citizenship when Kenyan became independent of Great Britain. Of course, dual citizenship precludes his eligibility to the office of president of the United States under Article II, Section I, Clause 5, United States constitution, requiring he be “natural born”. This clause was used by the Founding Fathers in reference to Vattel’s Law of Nations, Part I, Chapter 19, Section 212, which states:
“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
Ryan, time to stop hitting the bong!!!!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
ryan c, you are trying to use an alinsky tactic of making fun of people who you disagree with. Well sorry, but the obvious April Fool’s hoax is on you as you believe in an obvious hoax of a certificate of live birth that is on the web and some announcements that would NEVER hold up in court!!!!!!!
Truth is nobody really knows the truth about obama as he has covered up his past. While people like you chased bush for his air guard records you have given the messiah a pass on his past.
This is probably the best case of hypocrisy anyone could ever show!
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
All of this, of course, raises the specter of who registered his birth in Hawaii and where was he actually born. We know that no hospital in Hawaii has claimed title to his birth, not even the hospital where he now contends he was born, Kapi’olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital. Only inspection of the actual birth document, the one that AKA has but refuses to provide for inspection, will reveal the facts.
Then there are the social security numbers that AKA has used; one issued in Connecticut and one issued in Michigan, neither a state he has ever lived in. These two social security numbers are tied to addresses where AKA is known to have lived in Chicago. True to nature, his mother also used social security numbers that were not hers, one belonging to a western Washington woman who is still living. We know that illegal aliens use social security numbers that are not theirs but that law-abiding American citizens don’t need to.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
As an American, AKA would have been required to register with the Selective Service in 1980; as a non-resident student going to school in the United States, he would not have been required to register. Further, if an American in 1980, if he did not register for the Selective Service in 1980, such would preclude him from ever holding a public office.
The anomalies in his Selective Service registration indicate one of three things: 1) he was not a citizen in 1980; or 2) he was a citizen in 1980 but did not register; or 3) his Selective Service registration was forged in 2008 to make it appear he was an American in 1980.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Like his Occidental records, his Columbia University records have also been sealed. What we know is that no one, graduating the same year as AKA supposedly graduated from Columbia, can remember him, either in their class or in their classes; nor does he appear anywhere in the Columbia University year books. Reverend David Manning claims that the years AKA claims to have spent at Columbia were actually spent working for the CIA in Afghanistan. That Dr Manning has had his life threatened by “government types“, following his voicing of these claims, lends credence to his claims.
Equally so, AKA’s years at Harvard are sketchy with no information forthcoming and his records sealed. Even though he was supposedly the first “black” president of the Harvard Law Review, the articles required of him as president of that prestigious publication don’t seem to exist.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
The US Supreme Court knows what the constitutional condition of “natural born citizen” means. Even the most far left member of that court, Justice Ginsberg, is on record proclaiming that a “natural born citizen” is a birth child of TWO legal US citizens.
Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible for the office of president, which is why she refused to certify the following language when certifying Obama as the DNC candidate for president in 2008.
Obama is NOT a natural born citizen no matter where he might have been born. Obama’s birth father was at no time an American citizen and on this basis alone, Obama cannot be a constitutionally qualified resident of the White House.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
The US Constitution no longer stands as the governing law of this land. Obama’s many unconstitutional policies, Czars, executive orders and statements provide the proof, and the fact that nobody in DC cares whether or not Obama is constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States should send a shiver down the spine of every red blooded American citizen, no matter their partisan agendas.
The people willing to ask the tough questions are deemed crackpots and conspiracy theorists, racists or bigots. But those tough questions should be obvious questions to all Americans and every president should have to answer those questions, no matter race, creed, color or party affiliation.
I fear that those questions will only be answered at the tip of pitch forks and torches one day. Sooner or later, the people will run out of patience with a system built to exclude them. When that day comes, I fear what methods will be employed and whether or not there will be a country left to save by then.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Obama has hid his past well. There are no records available about any aspect of his family, his whereabouts, his financial backers, his college records and papers and yet he rose to the most powerful position in the world with the help of foreign money and a strange collection of anti-American bedfellows and unfortunately about 54% or so of Americans blinded by complicit socialists and Marxists in the media
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
The image posted by Daily KOS is a very high resolution image. It is portrayed as a scan of the original document. That has been challenged and it is well-documented that this image is almost certainly a fake. Also, when the document is analyzed by a freeware product that can detect manipulation, the “signature” detected indicates the document was definitely manipulated using Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya, and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth,” just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President.”
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Because of the way AKA OBAMA ran his campaign; donations from Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse, donations from illegal foreign sources, and ACORN’s crimes; More than half the voter registrations turned in by ACORN canvassers during the last election were not valid, according to testimony to be presented before a House Judiciary subcommittee, etc, AKA Obama is subject to criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code, federal campaign finance laws, and laws against voter registration fraud, according to a memo by Cleta Mitchell, co-chairman of the Republican National Lawyers Association. In spite of all this Congressional Democrats still want ACORN to be eligible for federal money.
This is the first president in history to flout election campaign laws and receive millions from foreign countries (including Gaza), blockbusting stories that broke at Atlas all during the campaign.
“Obama’s overseas (foreign) contributors are making multiple small donations, ostensibly in their own names, over a period of a few days, some under maximum donation allowances, but others are aggregating in excess of the maximums when all added up.”
The contributions had come from over 50 specifically named countries and major cities.
“Thousands of Obama’s foreign donations ended in cents.” U.S. contributors very rarely contribute in anything other than whole dollar amounts, so the reason why contributions would end with anything other than “.00″ would almost always involve foreign currency translation.
Posted by: Sarge31 | October 13, 2010, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
“Ryan C, if all you say is true then why has obama spent close to two million dollars keeping his birth certificate hidde”
He hasn’t.
Lying birthers conflate what he spent on lawyers during the election with what has been spent defending himself in lawsuits. WND is laughing all the way to the bank as they lie freely to the gullible birthers
Only one lawsuit happened prior to Obama being elected President and that was basically a motion to dismiss with 1 appearance.
In fact many of the lawsuits filed in relation to this Obama conspiracy theory have not even involved Obama.
Posted by: Rush Limbaugh | October 13, 2010, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Suddenly the dems are concerned about foreign sources of campaign donations ? I remember very well millions raised for the clintons from offshore sources. And how much of the AFLCIO membership is outside the US and do we have an accounting for where those monies have gone this campaign season.
Facts are the dems just want to silence opponents and feel entitled to do so, because they carry within them the hearts and souls of national socialism
Posted by: danf Farrand | October 13, 2010, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
I want to know when they are polling people about Obama’s citizenship, why don’t the numbers reflect the true number of people who have doubts? If you go by the number of people on EVERY site I go to that questions it, the comments are, by far, on the side that question his citizenship. I would say at least an 80/20 split, yet no one has said this in any poll.
Posted by: PJ | October 14, 2010, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Perhaps just as relevant, you should have asked about his plans to rule by executive order after the election and about the FCC planning on taking control of the internet on November 30th without congressional approval.
Why aren’t these issues being covered, Jake?
Posted by: PJ | October 14, 2010, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Quote: “There has never been travel ban to Pakistan.” By Ryan C.
On contrare dear Ryan. At least BO has written and stated that he traveled to Pakistan in his early adulthood.
Unless of course, you think BO is “lying.”
Is BO lying about his journey(s) to Pakistan? Or are you lyinng for BO?
Obviously, one or both is true.
Posted by: phillr | October 14, 2010, 7:11 am 7:11 am
“On contrare dear Ryan. At least BO has written and stated that he traveled to Pakistan in his early adulthood.”
Yes we know Obama traveled to Pakistan.
But there was no travel ban in place, there has never been one.
There was a travel advisory noting that Americans needed a 30 day visa and that staying longer required checking in with some Pakistani tourist center. Not exactly earth shattering and certainly not a travel ban.
Its just another made up lie by the birthers.
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 14, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
“Ryan C, if all you say is true then why has obama spent close to two million dollars keeping his birth certificate hidden?”
I can’t believe I am typing these words but “what Rush Limbaugh said”
Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | October 14, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
The question about “short form” versus “long form” is not relevent. Because under U.S. law, the form already posted and seen by everyone is considered legal and recognized proof of citizenship. It’s like if my car company claims I didn’t make a payment and requests proof of the canceled check. The bank doesn’t give you the original check anymore. You get a legal digital copy. The car company must, by law, accept that as proof of my canceled check. They can’t come back and say “no, we want to see the original canceled check.” And while you might say “Oh well, tell your bank to give you the original” by law there is no reason I should have to.
What Axelrod is saying is that ALL organizations should be required to disclose. He’s not asking to see the physical checks, just a disclosure of the contributors. A more accurate analogy to the short form versus long form birth certificate would be if Axelrod was requiring not just disclosure, but for the contributors to also explain where THEY got the money to donate in the first place.
Posted by: Julie Dawson | October 15, 2010, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
The White House wants the Chamber of Commerce to show who is donating so the union thugs and leftist groups can start harrassing and intimidating them.
Posted by: Ken Pittman | October 19, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Is there a video link for this story?
Posted by: Matt | October 19, 2010, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
For all those that don’t think Obama should have to show his birth certificate because he posted it on the net…
Seen the CarFax commercial?
How many of you would purchase a car from a dealer if you insisted he show you the CarFax and he kept blowing you off like in the commerical?
Then there is the one with the CarFox where he has al little hand puppet called CarFox.
More than likely not a single one. Now what do find more important a car purchase of the presidency of the USA.
It doesn’t matter how you try and spin it, all he has to do is show the real thing. Yet, he doesn’t. He won’t even go as far as saying the doctor’s name.
In fact, he will let a well decorated, bronze star earning, Army officer go to the brig, just not to show it. Now that’s the type of guy I want watching my countries back. Obama is a disgrace to this country.
Yes, Axelrod is right, if you won’t produce you ar hiding something.
Posted by: Matt | October 19, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
My bad, I didn’t catch the 1s line. It should be “shouldn’t” not “should”.
Posted by: Matt | October 19, 2010, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm