Obama: ‘Tough Votes’ Cast in Congress Are ‘Courageous’ While Putting ‘Congressional Careers at Risk’
From Sunlen Miller:
Three weeks before his party could take a tough hit in the voting booths, President Obama said this evening that a “pleasant surprise” of his job is seeing members of Congress cast tough votes over the past 20 months even though it might lead to their congressional demise.
“There are a lot of folks who took some really tough votes over the last 20 months knowing that it was bad for them politically, who voted for health care reform even though the polls said this would cause them problems in the next election, who voted for financial regulatory reform even though they knew that by supporting it it would impact big money pouring in and directing negative ads towards them,” the president said during a webcast town hall from The George Washington University. "And they did it anyway. And that was risky for them.”
The president highlighted some of those members who cast votes that could put their congressional careers at risk.
‘There have been a surprising number of folks who have been willing to stand up,” Obama said mentioning specifically by name Rep. Tom Perriello, D-Ala., Rep. John Boccieri, D-Ohio, Betsy Markey, D-Colo. “There have just been some folks who really stood up knowing that the might be putting their congressional careers at risk. And that’s been a pleasant surprise.”
The president noted that while it is “fashionable” to get down on Congress, but many members of Congress have been “courageous” over the last 20 months.
The question came during Obama’s “Commit to Vote” town hall at The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., this evening, one of many events this week and lead up to Election Day the president will have in order to get out the youth h vote.
The president said in front of a crowd of 125 supporters in the audience at GW that the youth vote is imperative to the Democrats results this year.
“Hope defeats fear and that manifests itself in you guys committing to vote,” Obama said. “November 2nd matters. If you were excited in 2008, that was the begging of the journey, not the end of the journey. Or to use a sports metaphor, we just finished the first quarter; we’ve got a whole lot more work to do.”
The president said if young voters can “muster and sustain that same effort and energy” as they had in 2008 then he is “confident that we will do well in the election. We will win all across the country and the polls bear that out.”
The president noted that Democrats don’t have the same excitement and energy that Republicans do right now, making his plea an us-against-them argument.
“Frankly, and I’m just going to be blunt, some on our side have said to themselves, ‘Well, you know what, everything that we thought was going to happen hasn’t happened immediately in 20 months and so maybe we don’t have the same enthusiasm and excitement that we had the first time around,’” Obama said, adding that it’s up to young voters to come out and prove them wrong.
“If all of you vote, I promise you we’re going to do just great.”
The president fielded questions from email, Twitter, the audience and, for the first time, Skype. And he quipped that all these tech-savvy forms of communication are “things that Malia and Sasha understand” that he’s still “trying to sort out.”
The very first question, sent in via email, gave the president a chance to blast third party groups running political ads with funds from undisclosed source, when the questioner asked how best citizens can work to mitigate the effect of corporate money in elections.
“We don’t know if they are being run by banks, or frustrated by some of our financial positions, we don’t know if they are being funded by foreign corporations, because they are not disclosed,” Obama said, adding that this poses a “huge problem.”
Obama noted that these groups have “every right under the First Amendment” to let their voices be heard. But knowing the identity of who is running the ads would help voters interpret them.
“I think all of us would agree that it would make a difference if you were watching these ads, that you found out that, well, Americans for Prosperity are actually bankrolled by a bunch of very wealthy special interests that are opposed to legislation that you support," he said. "That might have an influence on how you might interpret that ad.”
The president said that most ads -– especially in competitive congressional districts — the negative ads turn into “background noise.”
“It just must be non-stop,” he quipped, “so at a certain point people must tune that out.”
The president said that people are the most “powerful messengers possible,” so people must get out and spread the truth.
All the questions tonight were friendly, sent in by supporters and volunteers. One questioner wanted to know how they can communicate that Obama’s campaign message was not “yes we can … in 21 months,” but that change takes longer.
“Well that’s sort of a softball,” the president even noted.
The questions taken from Facebook and Twitter were chosen by the DNC to be representative of all the questions submitted, the DNC says, selected in advance so they could be integrated into the technology of the event.
– Sunlen Miller
Email
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
Ron Paul Ad's Call Santorum a 'Fake'
I applaud those who voted for progress for our nation, for health care reform, for saving our auto industry and the many jobs it directly and indirectly supports, the necessary bank bailouts, (of which almost all the money has been repaid,so why isn’t there news stories about it?) as well as worker protection laws passed, etc.
Thank you for doing your job and not just voting no, taking the politically easy way out.
Posted by: Lydia | October 12, 2010, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
“The questions taken from Facebook and Twitter were chosen by the DNC to be representative of all the questions submitted, the DNC says, selected in advance so they could be integrated into the technology of the event.”
.
Technology of the event? That means… so the questions could be determined in advance and put on the idiot board.
Posted by: gk | October 12, 2010, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Remember these names. They will be joining the ranks of the unemployed, and that right SOON!
Posted by: B.S. | October 12, 2010, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Obama’s still naive enough to think he can win the religious right vote. It will never happen.
Posted by: jan | October 13, 2010, 6:26 am 6:26 am
What about representing your constituents and voting for what they want? Be “courageous” on the campaign trail and tell the voters: “I am going to vote how Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid tell me to vote, not for what you want.”
See if that works. Because that is essentially what the President is congratulating them for.
Posted by: Jim Tayberry | October 13, 2010, 6:35 am 6:35 am
Obama translations:
TOUGH VOTE=VOTE THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REJECT TO THEIR CORE
COURAGEOUS=ACTING AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. ARROGANCE.
Any questions?
Nov 2=buh bye Democrats
Posted by: mjishernameo | October 13, 2010, 6:49 am 6:49 am
Courageous!?
Nah, I’d describe them as foolish or irresponsible or devoid of thoughtful consideration or partisan pandering votes.
Especially when you take into account that many of these votes were cast without knowing what the legislation said or what it really would do.
C’mon President Obama, please start to develop some sort of leadership abilities. This constant partisan diatribes from you are old, boring and useless.
Posted by: Noz | October 13, 2010, 7:30 am 7:30 am
Posted by: Lydia | Oct 12, 2010 10:43:24 PM
Comedy gold. You should write for The Onion. Seriously. LOL!
Posted by: Mary | October 13, 2010, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Jake,
The Town Hall was anything but. Just a staged, contrived event with pre-determined, softball questions from some of his supporters.
Events like this should not see the light of day.
Posted by: Sandy Kay | October 13, 2010, 8:07 am 8:07 am
This just beats all I have ever seen. Obama begins his campaign OVERSEAS (remember Germany anyone?) He still to this day has not accounted for the foreign donations to his 08 campaign nor has he accounted for the hundreds of thousands in campaign donations from “one” person who swears they never donated a penny. And Obama has the “Audacity of Hope” to call out the Chamber of Commerce to open their books?
Pot…meet Kettle
I don’t think Obama is surprised his flunkies carried his water. He is surprised that so many can actually see The Emperor Has No Clothes!
Posted by: BS Flag | October 13, 2010, 8:19 am 8:19 am
I see Lydia is drinking Koolaid this morning already. Applaud them for destroying are country. Whats wrong with you people
Posted by: succabm | October 13, 2010, 8:21 am 8:21 am
This arrogant bunch of politicians rammed legislation down our throats and bribed, lied and stole whatever they had to do to get this piece of garbage passed and he is congratulating them? It shows how out of touch this president is. He is not a leader…he is a dictator and the November elections will tell him loud and clear WE are not in the mood to be dictated to. Goodbye Jimmy Carter II.
Posted by: MomofFour | October 13, 2010, 8:23 am 8:23 am
I see Lydia is drinking Koolaid this morning already. Applaud them for destroying are country. Whats wrong with you people
Posted by: succabm | Oct 13, 2010 8:21:35 AM
Just the way Progressives believe, which is the opposite of what the USA was founded on .
Posted by: deanbob | October 13, 2010, 8:23 am 8:23 am
The “politically easy way out” is just to cram through any bill that you can get the votes for. A politician “doing their job” would do the right reform the right way, and the reason these careers are in jeopardy is that they did not deliver that to the American people.
The cat is out of the bag for President Obama, and people are beginning to understand they were sold a bill of goods.
Posted by: Schaef | October 13, 2010, 8:29 am 8:29 am
“Just the way Progressives believe, which is the opposite of what the USA was founded on.”
And why Air America went bankrupt.
Twice.
Posted by: Mary | October 13, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Oh yeah! Such heroes!
Posted by: LongT | October 13, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Lydia, Too bad your tax money was the only.
Posted by: LongT | October 13, 2010, 8:40 am 8:40 am
The amazing thing about this article is that it was from ABC! I wonder how much longer the powers that be will continue to allow him to go against the company ‘line’. I don’t think poor Lydia realizes that each of the so-called ‘reforms’ meant US Government intervention/ownership!
Posted by: Thad | October 13, 2010, 8:51 am 8:51 am
The president said if young voters can “muster and sustain that same effort and energy” as they had in 2008 then he is “confident that we will do well in the election. We will win all across the country and the polls bear that out.”
***********************************
So bama is begging the young voters to vote for them because they are to young to remember how good it was before him taking office. I am not talking about Bush I am talking in general. He can pull the wool over their eyes but not us older people.
Posted by: succabm | October 13, 2010, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Brave? Intentially voting the opposite of the way the people they represent want them to vote is “Brave”?
That statement tells us all we need to know about this man, and should scare the crap out of us.
Posted by: hoopsmom | October 13, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am
“Hope defeates fear” he says, while all he and Biden do is fearmonger in their endless campaigning:
- they’re counting on black people to stay home from the polls.
- you can’t let them have the keys back or they’ll drive this country into the ground.
- they’ll take away your Social Security
So much for the hope, President Two-Face.
Posted by: Dave | October 13, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Lydia,
The politically “easy” thing to do is to just give people money. And that’s why we’re in the debt situation we’re in now.
Sometimes the hard thing to do is to say no, we’re not going to spend money endlessly. You’re going to have to save your own business.
One of this year’s Nobel prize winners in Economics is famous for proving that unemployment insurance makes unemployment rates higher. Yet we keep endlessly extending unemployment benefits and then wondering why the unemployment rate won’t come down.
Bailing people out with other people’s money is the easiest thing to do in the world. These weren’t courageous votes at all. The only difference is that now people are finally waking up to the realization that when everybody’s getting someone else’s money, the system doesn’t work any more.
Cheers to the “Party of No” for acting like grown-ups for once.
Posted by: Dave | October 13, 2010, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Perriello is from VA, not AL.
Posted by: Crush Liberalism | October 13, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Lydia is the only one who has posted anything with any historical accuracy. Stopping denial of coverage for preexisting conditions, when you change jobs and getting dropped for frivolous reasons….just parts of the many great victories over the greedy self-serving health insurance industry. Republicans never have and never will have the guts to stand up to their corporate masters on behalf of our citizens on any issue at such high political costs.
Posted by: Skip | October 13, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
“I applaud those who voted for progress for our nation”
If, by “progress”, you mean that finally the Marxists who run the House will be tossed out in favor of the good guys, then I agree. “Progress” is coming November 2!
Posted by: Crush Liberalism | October 13, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Why wouldn’t Republicans want to save our auto industry? They’d be happy to sell them out for Japanese and German manufactures apparently. It makes you wonder how many Yen are showing up in Republican campaign coffers down at the Chamber of Commerce.
Posted by: Skip | October 13, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Only Obama would be silly enough to say that those who voted with him are “courageous” – substitute “stupid” or “un-American” or “cowardly”!
The courageous Americans are overseas, fighting wars in Afghanistan and (hopefully, no more) in Iraq.
I might add, another courageous group is Mexican officials who’re fighting the drug lords – that’s more dangerous than anything.
Let’s hope we get an adult in the White House next time, not another adolescent.
Posted by: MissButterfly | October 13, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Obama: “. . . many members of Congress have been “courageous” over the last 20 months.”
Courageous? More like arrogant, incompetent and stupid.
Posted by: SpiderMike | October 13, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Obama will be joining those ‘courageous’ Congressmen in 2012 on the funemployment line.
Hope the beneficiaries of the “stimulus” enjoyed their taxpayer funded Democratic payback to their friends.
Posted by: GarandFan | October 13, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
The president said if young voters can “muster and sustain that same effort and energy” as they had in 2008 then he is “confident that we will do well in the election. We will win all across the country and the polls bear that out.”
So what Obama is saying is
“I have no hope of convincing older informed voters to go along with my socialist agenda. I have less hope of convincing conservatives as no amount of convoluted logic can fool those folks into believing that my agenda is American and constitutional. That’s why I need you Pie-in-the-Sky young voters to turn out so that we at least have a chance at winning. Forget about our record, which we can’t run on, or the issues at hand, vote Democrat because I, Barack Hussein Obama need your support.”
Posted by: Noz | October 13, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am
“Why wouldn’t Republicans want to save our auto industry?” – Skippy
The question should be
Why wouldn’t the government want to save our auto industry?
Because it’s not their job to do so.
Read the constitution Skip.
The Auto industry should have went through Bankruptcy and then they should have saved themselves.
The political problem with that is the Unions would have gotten a worse deal than they did.
Posted by: Noz | October 13, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am
“Only Obama would be silly enough to say that those who voted with him are “courageous” – substitute “stupid” or “un-American” or “cowardly”!”
The real idiotic cowards are the ones who claim Americans aren’t really Americans when exercising their legal right to vote for whom they choose.
Posted by: Skip | October 13, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Getting calls 99 to 1 against the taxpayer funded bailout, and voting for it so they could give each other lavish bonuses and NOT buy “toxic assets” that is polluting the market.
The D’s did this, and deserve to be held accountable… Period!
Posted by: B.S. | October 13, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Skip: “Why wouldn’t Republicans want to save our auto industry?”
Ford is doing just fine. And Toyota and Honda are thriving. Why is that?
Posted by: Mary | October 13, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am
“The Auto industry should have went through Bankruptcy and then they should have saved themselves”
Now tell us “saved themselves” doesn’t mean mean putting them up for sale on the international auction block. So what’s all the fuss about the Chamber of Commerce taking foreign money again?
Posted by: Skip | October 13, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Obama seems to think he knows what’s better for people than people do. Why? Because he’s smarter than the people? Because his ideology is morally and rationally sound while the people are mired in regressive, bigoted, populist falsehoods? In return for changing America in ways that most Americans don’t want it changed, the voters are going to take power away from the Democrats this November. Notably, the Democrats who will lose their power this November were promised that ObamaCare, the Stimulus, the Bailouts, Card Check, Cap and Trade, etc. would be popular once the people got used to them. Therefore, were their votes in support of these legislative monstrosities really courageous, or were they simply a fool’s hope?
Posted by: Lavaux | October 13, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Oh, is that right Barack? The finality to all this as those that supported your policies Barack will now be out of a job. Gee, thanks for taking that unnecessary brick to the head for me friends, who are you again? As a fairly large business owner in California no less, if any one of these folks came to our company for a job? You can start your new job in very familiar territory, in the men’s and women’s lavatories’ if at all. Now, here’s your own toothbrush. Start trottin…..
Posted by: Tina Ferrer | October 13, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I thing Obama has forgotten a certain document which states” A government of the people, by the people and for the people”.
The congressional actions were not for the people only a small identiifed few.
The people wanted jobs, controlled government spending and leadership. That is why he and the democrats were voted in. Instead, they focused on an agenda that the majority did not agree with, nor want.
This is not the democrat party of Truman or Kennedy”Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country”, this is a total new party.
The Democrat party of Obama no longer follows the Democrat principles of Truman and Kennedy it now has transformed itself into “Ask not what you can do for your country, Ask and Demand what your country can do for you”.
It is a sad day in American History
Posted by: Robert | October 13, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Skip: “It makes you wonder how many Yen are showing up in Republican campaign coffers down at the Chamber of Commerce.”
Only if you’re a Democrat facing a tough election season. There’s no evidence to back this latest smear against the private sector. Just because Democrats receive much of their money from foreign donors, doesn’t mean Republicans are doing the same. This is just another case of Democrats projecting their sins onto others.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 13, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Just because Democrats receive much of their money from foreign donors,
————-
There’s evidence for this smear?
NO????
What a shocker.
lol.
Posted by: progressive mama | October 13, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
“There have just been some folks who really stood up knowing that the might be putting their congressional careers at risk. And that’s been a pleasant surprise.”
Therein lies the problem. Since when is it considered a “career choice” to sit in a bloated congress? I guess I’m old enough to have missed the Congress brochures from the high school guidance counselor on career day.
Posted by: Me | October 13, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Now tell us “saved themselves” doesn’t mean mean putting them up for sale on the international auction block. So what’s all the fuss about the Chamber of Commerce taking foreign money again?
Posted by: Skip | Oct 13, 2010 10:09:29 AM
—
:>)
The Chamber of Commerce is spending a hundred million dollars this election, an unprecedented amount, on attack ads against Democrats. We have no idea how much of it is from foreign funding because they refuse to say– and they’re accounting is “interesting.” (See Washington Monthly, James Verini: “Show Him the Money:Tom Donohue scares millions of dollars out of corporations and Republicans. But is his U.S. Chamber of Commerce good for business?)
Posted by: progressive mama | October 13, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Obama says: ““There are a lot of folks who took some really tough votes over the last 20 months knowing that it was bad for them politically. . .”
Well, maybe they didn’t know it. After all, their president told them last March that “I am actually confident . . .that (voting for ObamaCare) will end up being the smart thing to do politically. . .”
His confidence, their political survival. There is no one this guy won’t throw under the bus to further his own agenda. Too bad the Flavor Aid drinkers didn’t figure it out earlier.
Posted by: Mike Bates | October 13, 2010, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
progressive mama: “See Washington Monthly, James Verini: “Show Him the Money:Tom Donohue scares millions of dollars out of corporations and Republicans.”
While I’m sure Tom Donohue would appreciate the credit, Obama and the Democrats in congress are responsible. The private sector, the engine of our economy, is scared indeed, and they’re not the only ones. You’ll see in November. Liberals never learn.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 13, 2010, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Anonymous: “Just because Democrats receive much of their money from foreign donors . . .”
progressive mama: “There’s evidence for this smear?”
I thought a liberal might chime in with their hypocrisy on this. So, it’s only a smear when accusations of foreign contributions are directed at Democrats, but accusations directed at Republicans are automatically considered fact?
There’s actual evidence of foreign donations to the Obama 2008 campaign. Just do a little research. Like I said, this is just another case of Democrats projecting their sins onto others.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 13, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“There’s actual evidence of foreign donations to the Obama 2008 campaign”
But they were returned were they not? So I assume the Chamber of Commerce is returning all foreign donations too, right?
Posted by: Skip | October 13, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Anonymous: “There’s actual evidence of foreign donations to the Obama 2008 campaign.”
Skip: “But they were returned were they not?”
They were not, according to the source of at least one of the donations.
Skip: “So I assume the Chamber of Commerce is returning all foreign donations too, right?”
If they had any to return. Like I said, there’s no evidence there is. Just a classic Democrat smear before an election. They are desperate indeed this year.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 13, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
PM,
I guess you’re ignoring the work done by other newspapers and magazines, like the NY Times, that say there’s absolutely no reason to think foreign money is being used for political purposes.
Their foreign dues are $100,000 per year, and their budget is $20,000,000. You really think they need foreign money?
But go ahead and go down that road. It’s obvious to everyone that Democrats can’t run on their accomplishments, so they just try to find another bogeyman to scare people with.
Posted by: Dave | October 13, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
“If they had any to return. Like I said, there’s no evidence there is”
But what’s pretty apparent is nobody, especially down at the Chamber, is saying there isn’t.
Posted by: Skip | October 13, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Skip: “But what’s pretty apparent is nobody, especially down at the Chamber, is saying there isn’t (foreign political contributions).”
They’ve absolutely said their isn’t. Please see the following quotes in response to the administrations absurd accusation. If you have evidence to the contrary, Skip, by all means, please forward it to the proper authorities.
Chamber of Commerce: “So we do not declare that we use any foreign money to fund any of our issue advocacy activities.”
Chamber of Commerce: “We are under legal obligations to account and have an accounting method that ensures that in our accounts that funds or any aspect of money that comes from a foreign source is not in any way utilized in any political sense. We ensure that we do that.”
Chamber of Commerce: “Look, if you’re in the business that we are in, you are audited annually by the IRS, your activities are reviewed consistently by the federal election commission and others, that’s fine with us, because we comply with all the laws.”
Posted by: Anonymous | October 13, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“They’ve absolutely said their isn’t. Please see the following quotes in response to the administrations absurd accusation. If you have evidence to the contrary, Skip, by all means, please forward it to the proper authorities”
They haven’t denied they’ve gotten funding from foreign sources, they deny it gets used for political purposes, but at the same time they can’t demonstrate there is any real financial compartmentalization inside their organization. And who is claiming it’s illegal? The Supreme Court ruling opened the door for this kind of nonsense. My bet is the information does not get disclosed, and not because of the bogus claim that it will prevent the trampling of donors front lawns.
Posted by: Skip | October 13, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
But what’s pretty apparent is nobody, especially down at the Chamber, is saying there isn’t.
Posted by: Skip | Oct 13, 2010 2:40:43 PM
————-
Skip channels Joe McCarthy. Just when you thought you’d seen it all …
Posted by: Woody | October 13, 2010, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
President Obama says that by casting tough votes for these bills, these Congressmen and Women are putting their “congressional careers at risk.” I read that as meaning that Obama is subtly and indirectly saying that the bills passed by the current Congress really are bad for the American people and he knows it, but they are part of his agenda, and these politicians voting for these bills are voting yes to make him happy and to trot the party line. One would think that if the bills passed truly were great for the American people, the people would vote for these “brave” politicians over and over again in the future, and thus securing their careers for years to come. “Congressional careers at risk” just screams “thanks for sacrificing your careers to say yes to garbage bills that we know won’t work but we want them anyways.”
Posted by: Dan | October 14, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
The choices were “tough” because the dems knew full well that the American people did not want the healthcare bill. They voted for the item most important to them, the party line, not the American people. Nov 2nd we the people will let them know how we feel about that.
Posted by: PickyBiker | October 14, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm