By Jenny Schlesinger

Nov 4, 2010 5:17pm

Pentagon Dismisses Reports of 34 Warships for Obama Trip Security

ABC News' Luis Martinez reports: The Pentagon did not mince words in dismissing as “absolutely absurd” and “comical” media reports from Indian news outlets that the US Navy was sending 34 warships off the coast of Mumbai as part of the security preparations for President Obama’s upcoming trip to India.   Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell did not shy away from dismissing reports that appeared in Indian media outlets, such as the Press Trust of India and the television network NDTV. The Press Trust of India is that country’s largest news agency.  Morrell  told reporters he was making an exception to the practice of not discussing Presidential security details to shoot down the reports.  “I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd this notion that somehow we were deploying 10 percent of the Navy — some 34 ships and an aircraft carrier — in support of the president's trip to Asia,” said Morrell at today’s Pentagon briefing. “That's just comical. Nothing close to that is being done."  He acknowledged that a Presidential trip requiring security needs “should not come as a surprise to anyone” and that the Defense Department “does play a role in support of Presidential missions.” He said it was customary to not discuss such security requests, but “I made an exception in batting down this absurd notion of there being 34 ships, or more than 10 percent of the Navy, deployed in support of this trip. That is most certainly not the case.”  The Indian media reports also say security for the Presidential trip will cost $200 million a day.  Morrell “there's been a lot of creative writing that's been done on this trip over the last few days. I've seen other reports with some astronomical figures in terms of what it costs to take these trips. I don't know the cost. We don't speak to the cost.” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was blunt in his characterization of the cost reports, “this trip doesn't cost $200 million a day.”  Referring to the reports about the 34 warships GIbbs said, “The Department of Defense has said, as we have, that that's simply not true.” Gibbs would only say the costs were comparable to the costs incurred by Presidents George W. Bush and Clinton to the region.  A Navy spokesman said “we do not comment on Presidential security,” but provided some statistics about the Navy’s deployment schedule that help put the Indian media reports into some context.   There are 288 ships in the Navy’s fleet, currently 147 of them are away from their home port and at sea.  110 of the 147 are deployed on missions, the other 37 are involved in training. Those numbers translate to 51 percent of the total fleet being at sea right now  and 38 percent of the fleet being deployed.  Using the number of 34 warships being reported by Indian media outlets, 34 ships out of 288 would mean 11.8 percent of the fleet would  supposedly be working Obama security.  ABC News Jon Garcia contributed to this report. -Luis Martinez

User Comments

Drudge….increasing the stupid since 98.

Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | November 4, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

34 is absurd, but we won’t say how many. (It’s 33.)
$200 million is inflated, but we won’t say how much it is.
A good laugh from the most transparent administration ever.

Posted by: Dave | November 4, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Unbelievable how fast unsubstantiated hate spreads – as if this is some frivolous wasteful junket.
HELLO? During the first 5 months of 2010, American exporters grew their sales to India by 23.4% to $7.5 BILLION dollars. Good news and strengthening ties and trade between the world’s 2 largest democracies is even better.
Exports are an important part of our ECONOMIC RECOVERY.
Asia is a growing consumer economy that can contribute to more JOBS here at home: aircraft, jewelry, chemicals, telecommunications equipment, steel and petroleum, + industrial hardware all MADE IN THE USA.

Posted by: green.goddess | November 4, 2010, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

What struck me about this article–after my surprise that the DoD took so long to quash the rumors about 34 ships–was that, not that many years ago, we had 600 ships. Where did they go? Did we cut them up and sell the steel to fund our burgeoning welfare state?
Are threats from foreign enemies gone? Does Vladimir Putin love us? How about the rapidly growing Chicom military (including its navy)?
Ask a Brit, who’s not totally stupid, what happens when a nation gives up her sea power.

Posted by: p0rkch0p | November 4, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Gibbs is always a hoot; his handling of facts when speaking with the press has earned him the title of “Baghdad Bob” as a result of his, uh, creativity.
When all is said and done, we will probably find out that the trip cost only 198 million dollars per day, and Gibbs will tell us with a straight face that he didn’t lie.

Posted by: Ed Watts | November 4, 2010, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“Ask a Brit, who’s not totally stupid, what happens when a nation gives up her sea power.”
She loses her colonies?
As one of the former, Americans tend to think that is a good thing.
But I guess your point was that we are somehow no longer a dominant Naval force because we have less ships.
We have 11 aircraft carriers organized into strike groups.
No other nation has more than 2 carriers with most being light carriers with limited air wings.
No other nation has anything like our Aegis or Burke ships.

Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | November 4, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

No other nation has anything like our Aegis or Burke ships.”
This was badly phrased.
Should have read no other nation has anything like our Burke ships with Aegis (aegis is a combo radar and weapons control system)

Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | November 4, 2010, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“What struck me about this article–after my surprise that the DoD took so long to quash the rumors about 34 ships–was that, not that many years ago, we had 600 ships. Where did they go? Did we cut them up and sell the steel to fund our burgeoning welfare state?”
The 600 ships thing was a myth from the Reagan era.
Since then the Cold War ended.

Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | November 4, 2010, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

“Why would the Indian press release false information?”
You would have to ask them.
“Did they cite sources?”
Nope.
But that does not stop the right wing media from running with it the story.
Why is the right wing so pathologically dishonest?

Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | November 4, 2010, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Yes, how dishonest of the “right-wing” media to report something based on what our allies in India reported. The nerve of them.
You’re ridiculous, Ryan C. The fact is, you’re taking the word of stumbling, bumbling Bob Gibbs over the Indian media, and calling anyone who doesn’t believe Bob Gibbs dishonest, when anyone with half a brain knows that he’s anything BUT honest.

Posted by: Dave | November 4, 2010, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

“You’re ridiculous, Ryan C. The fact is, you’re taking the word of”
No, I am using logic that says 34 ships is 2 to 3 times the size of a carrier strike group and as pointed out would amount to 10% of our Navy.
But if the word of someone is important to you look at the article you are commenting on:
“Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell did not shy away from dismissing reports that appeared in Indian media outlets, such as the Press Trust of India and the television network NDTV. The Press Trust of India is that country’s largest news agency.
Morrell told reporters he was making an exception to the practice of not discussing Presidential security details to shoot down the reports.
“I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd this notion that somehow we were deploying 10 percent of the Navy — some 34 ships and an aircraft carrier — in support of the president’s trip to Asia,” said Morrell at today’s Pentagon briefing. “That’s just comical. Nothing close to that is being done.”
Need word from someone on your team perhaps?
FoxNews”In a statement also disregarding the PTI projections, Gordon Johndroe, former deputy White House spokesperson under President George W. Bush said, “I am positive there will not be ’34 warships’ involved in this trip.”
You’re a perfect illustration of the right wing’s pathological dishonesty.
You insist something must be true because it works with the right wing narrative on Obama.

Posted by: Ryan C (resident curmudgeon) | November 4, 2010, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

The Indian press can be a bit…whimsical.
I do wonder how much this trip is costing. Two luxury hotels completely shut down.
I think, in these fiscally difficult times, taxpayers should be told how much we are paying.

Posted by: MayBee | November 4, 2010, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Posted by: Ed Watts | Nov 4, 2010 6:20:57 PM posted: “we will probably find out that the trip cost only 198 million dollars per day.”
OK Ed. Let’s go with your fantasy football projection and say that this trip does cost $198 million per day. Ding-dong Michele Bachmann fantasizes it is $200 million per day, so better yet, let’s say $200 million.
The President is visiting 4 major trade partners: India, South Korea, Indonesia and Japan. This trip is designed to help increase US exports with each of these nations – for example, during the first 5 months of 2010, American exporters grew their sales to India by 23.4% to $7.5 BILLION dollars.
We want them to buy more from our country, not other countries, right?
So in your view, would it be worth spending millions on this trip to influence $BILLIONs of new US exports? (You may recall we are still in a Recession, and strengthening export relationships can also build long term JOBS here at home.)

Posted by: green.goddess | November 4, 2010, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

So in your view, would it be worth spending millions on this trip to influence $BILLIONs of new US exports? (You may recall we are still in a Recession, and strengthening export relationships can also build long term JOBS here at home.)
==========
Yes, it would be worth it.
I know S Korea wants and has wanted a free trade agreement. Is the groundwork laid for that?
Has the groundwork been done? Is it at a Presidential involvement stage? Is it important now?
All valid questions, because it does appear to be a very expensive trip.

Posted by: MayBee | November 4, 2010, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Pretty much everything that comes out of Mr. Obama has some lies tied to it. For example, he said several months, ago that he rather be a good one-term President, than a bad two-termer, because he will fight for what he believes in. But it looks like he got scared and not carried through with his conviction after last night loss.

Posted by: young_voter | November 4, 2010, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Because of security he could not tell us there will only be around 35 ships. Did the White House propaganda ministry also deny taking the entire Mubai Taj Mahal hotel?

Posted by: nat turner | November 4, 2010, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

MayBee | Nov 4, 2010 7:17:34 PM posted “Has the groundwork been done? Is it at a Presidential involvement stage? Is it important now?”
According to Bloomberg Businessweek, the answer is YES.
South Korean Trade Minister Kim Jong-hoon and U.S Trade Representative Ron Kirk met last week in the U.S.
President Lee Myung-bak announced confidence on Wednesday that South Korea and the U.S. can finalize a long-stalled free trade deal.
And, in a telephone conversation this week Lee and Obama agreed to make efforts to finalize the deal.
The White House also said that if Seoul and Washington “can reach a satisfactory agreement on the key issues for American workers, we will have a deal.”
Conservatives may HATE this kind of spending on a trip to Asia, but Obama is pointing our economy in the right direction. To pull out of this nasty Recession, we need to change from a nation of debt-ridden consumers to a nation of producers again.

Posted by: green.goddess | November 4, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Not for nothing but has anyone thought that part,and by that I mean most of the reported “34″ could be Indian Navy?

Posted by: Alfie | November 4, 2010, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

The White House also said that if Seoul and Washington “can reach a satisfactory agreement on the key issues for American workers, we will have a deal.”
Conservatives may HATE this kind of spending on a trip to Asia,
=========
The Free Trade agreement was signed in 2007. Congress (which has been Democratically controlled since then) will not ratify it.
Hopefully, Obama has been doing the groundwork at home, too. But perhaps he waited until he thought Congress would have more Republicans who would vote for it before he decided to readdress this issue with the Koreans.
I don’t hate the spending if the trip is worth it, but I think we all have the right to know how much it is costing us.

Posted by: MayBee | November 4, 2010, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

I think we all have the right to know how much it is costing us.
Posted by: MayBee | Nov 4, 2010 8:13:17 PM
I support full disclosure but for security reasons I think its wiser to tell us after the fact. I vote for full disclosure after he is back home safe and sound. I see no issue with allowing terrorists to believe there are 34 warships and millions of security people filling up luxury hotels in the run up to the trip. I’m finding the Republican drumbeat to undermine security really sickening.

Posted by: Knock knock: who's there?: Orange.. | November 4, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

I support full disclosure but for security reasons I think its wiser to tell us after the fact. I vote for full disclosure after he is back home safe and sound.
========
I don’t believe cost gives away any security secrets.
But ok, how about after every Presidential trip we get an accounting of how much it cost the US taxpayer.

Posted by: MayBee | November 4, 2010, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

We are faced with a choice of believing the Indian press or believing the Obama administration. Coming on the heels of their repeated, knowingly false charges of criminal conduct by the Chamber of Commerce, the American people are understandably unsure whom to believe.
It’s a pity they brought this state of affairs upon themselves.
But no, there aren’t 34 warships involved. Even though the Obama administration says it, it’s true.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 4, 2010, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

“No other nation has anything like our Aegis or Burke ships.”
All of the Arleigh Burke class DDG’s are Aegis ships. The phrase “or Burke” is superfluous.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 4, 2010, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Whatever Obama’s safe transport costs, it needs to be taken care of.
We’ll find out eventually whether there was excess.

Posted by: bluecollarbytes | November 4, 2010, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

You know when the GOP-Tea Party right wing media starts propogating this type of false information they are just making the GOP-Tea Pary and their type of “news” look silly, petty and insignificant. Keep up this type of nonsense and you will become your own worst enemy with these types of bizarre statements.
This is a trip to try and open that market so that our American businesses can get their goods into a market that has millions of consumers. The President will get the same type of security he and every other President receives whenever they travel abroad.

Posted by: I've had it | November 4, 2010, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

“This is a trip to try and open that market so that our American businesses can get their goods into a market that has millions of consumers.”
If he lowered their taxes their business would grow. But he is an economic ignoramus.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | November 4, 2010, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

This is a trip to try and open that market so that our American businesses can get their goods into a market that has millions of consumers.
Posted by: I’ve had it |
This is also a trip to the outsourcing capital of the world. Maybe they will have a clever Earn American Buy American campaign.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | November 4, 2010, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

This trip is designed to help increase US exports with each of these nations – for example, during the first 5 months of 2010, American exporters grew their sales to India by 23.4% to $7.5 BILLION dollars.
We want them to buy more from our country, not other countries, right?
…..And, in a telephone conversation this week Lee and Obama agreed to make efforts to finalize the deal.
Posted by: green.goddess
So telephone calls have really sealed the deal, and the trip is for pomp?

Posted by: wheresmymoney | November 4, 2010, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

I’m no insisting the report isn’t true. I’m just not assuming this administration is telling us the truth. Remember when we were supposed to be skeptical of whatever the White House said. Why, heck, that was only a few years ago. Now that Mr. Hope-n-change is in office, we’re supposed to believe everything they say. And you accuse ME of believing things just because they fit a narrative?
Keep swallowing the Obama administration’s bs hook, line and sinker. Keep believing that they really do want don’t-ask-don’t-tell. Keep believing that they’ll close Guantanamo. Keep believing that they’ll be open and transparent. Keep believing everything they say, despite all visible proof to the contrary. Keep being the sheep you are.

Posted by: Dave | November 4, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

This is still NOTHING compared to the 4.5 billion dollars of private property damage that Glenn Beck’s tea party inflicted during its march on Washington.
See how much fun it is to make up numbers?

Posted by: TruthHurts | November 4, 2010, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

I don’t believe cost gives away any security secrets.
Posted by: MayBee | Nov 4, 2010 8:37:34 PM
Then I don’t think you pay much attention to right wing guerilla tactics. Just as now, they would keep lying till an itemized list was on the table. Its what Republicans do, and, imho, on security they need to be cut off, with details disclosed following the trip. However, even then, the security measures would still not be itemized for obvious reasons. Just a lump sum would have to be made available and a general explanation as to what security was covering.
It’s peculiar what Republicans do and do not see the need for disclosure and transparency on. I see double standards and blatant hypocrisy.

Posted by: Knock knock: who's there?: Orange.. | November 5, 2010, 12:27 am 12:27 am

It seems Gibbs was trying to equate The Press Trust of India with the likes of a supermarket tabloid. I’m sure THAT will go over well.

Posted by: TobyTucker | November 5, 2010, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Knock, knock:
Yet it’s perfectly fine for the administration to insinuate that the Chamber of Commerce was using foreign money for campaign purposes without any evidence to the contrary.
The White House started this game of unfounded allegations, and now they don’t like it when people do it to them. Boo frickin’ hoo.

Posted by: Dave | November 5, 2010, 7:48 am 7:48 am

King Barry and Queen Michelle Antwanette flee the scene of the crime, stepping over the Democrat carcasses who will not be returing to DC in January 2011…

Posted by: tjp612 | November 5, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am

This is a trip to try and open that market so that our American businesses can get their goods into a market that has millions of consumers.
Posted by: I’ve had it |
If Barry is soooo pro-business and interested in opening up markets, why haven’t he and his Democratic accomplices on Capitol Hill passed the free trade agreements negotiated with South Korea, Colombia, and Panama? It would be a lot cheaper…and could have been done last year.
No, this is an opportunity for Barry to stoke his massive ego (by going somewhere where he is more popular than back home) and to deflect attention to the drubbing the Democrats took on 11/2.
“What’s different this time around is ‘you got me’” is what King Barry told skittish moderate Congressional Democrats earlier this year. The One (Termer) was right…and many Republicans rode the Obama Agenda to victory.

Posted by: tjp612 | November 5, 2010, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Why is everyone taking the media’s word for it? Call the Pentagon, DOD, Whitehouse, Congress yourself and ask them. See how far you get with answers. Helps to have friends over in India – ask them as well. But y’all believe what you see here, with everyone in the Whitehouse scrambling to cover this trips expenses – call Geoff Morrell yourselves. See how ya do

Posted by: DeanJamison | November 5, 2010, 11:18 am 11:18 am

This trip was set up a long time ago by Hillary Clinton. They’re also holding a military yard sale – all the ASATS you can get for $1.00. India’s not all that happy that Obama has promised Pakistan a half a trillion for their weapons as well, next year. India and Pakistan do not play well. I wouldn’t sweat it – Bernake just printed another $600 million yesterday – that ought to cover the hotel rooms.

Posted by: DeanJamison | November 5, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Dean Jamison is another example of the GOP wacko mentality that actually has destroyed this country. When they say “they” want their country back…you have to wonder 1> Why did they loose it in the first place — kind of obvious 2> Isn’t this country America–or is it Germany 1939?

Posted by: David | November 5, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am

And FWIW, Geoff Morrell was a former ABC reporter, was heavily involved in the Clinton campaign as well as being a reporter for WBBM in Chicago. So this time he made an “exception” to comment on National Security. How nice.

Posted by: DeanJamison | November 5, 2010, 11:43 am 11:43 am

You idiot wingnuts are the dumbest people in the country. How do you tie your shoes in the morning?
This is the Fox Cult effect in action. Don’t believe anything you hear or read, unless it’s on Fox Cult Network, or perhaps the word of an impotent ugly drug addicted talk radio host is also considered credible.
Keep up the comedy wingnuts. I’m glad to know the cost of presidential trips abroad cause so much concern to your ten watt brains. Now, where were all you wingnuts when Bush started two wars and money was being sucked down the hole like a vacuum cleaner?
Oh, that’s right, you didn’t care back then because Bush was white.

Posted by: Justin | November 5, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Posted by: wheresmymoney | Nov 4, 2010 10:30:00 PM posted: “So telephone calls have really sealed the deal, and the trip is for pomp?”
Have you ever “sold” anything? Or even closed a Million dollar deal? Or how about closed the prospect of BILLIONS in potential exports?
If not, then it’s armchair quarterbacking by the clueless.

Posted by: green.goddess | November 5, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

I tie my shoes whatever way Megyn Kelly tells me to, Justin.
I’m sure your parents are very proud that you think you’re superior to anyone who disagrees with you. Just keep telling yourself: it’s not me, it’s everyone else; it’s not me, it’s everyone else. Life is so much easier when you live it in denial.

Posted by: Dave | November 5, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Yeah how did we get fooled? I mean Obama has been so good with a buck after all. After blowing through 3 trillion in 2 years, billion does seem like chump change after all. Roll the presses DUH WON and print mo money.

Posted by: Red Ruffansore | November 5, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

200,000,000 Indian Rupees= 4.5 Million USD. Apparently the article forgot about the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Rupee.

Posted by: Predictor92 | November 5, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

I’m just floored at how many of you are so desperately entrenched in right wing ideology. What a brilliant scheme to trick this many people into infusing a political ideology so deeply into their very identity that they keep a vice grip hold on everything from lies to innuendo just to protect it. As though their very lives depend on it. What gives? So far gone, these people would rather die than question what is clearly exterior programming determining their opinions. It’s utterly sickening. And that fact that it’s America only makes me sicker.

Posted by: mlynn1231 | November 9, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.