Feb 11, 2011 11:07am

Treasury Sec. Tim Geithner’s Plan to Wind Down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

From Tahman Bradley:

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner spoke to Brookings Institution this morning about the set of options he presented to Congress about transitioning the U.S. mortgage market away from dependence on the government.

Specifically, he spoke about winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

"We need to wind down Fannie and Freddy and substantially reduce the government's footprint in the housing market," Geithner said.

Geithner said it's important that Congress overhauls the mortgage market gradually because the government is now the dominant source of housing finance. "(We need to) make sure doing this doesn't impede the recovery of the housing market," he said.

Going forward all parties involved in the mortgage market must understand a new set of rules, Geithner said.

There must be clarity on what capital banks have to hold against mortgage risk, stronger stands so that homeowners are required to hold more equity in their homes, better protection for consumers, better incentives for securitization and clarification on risk retention.

The set of reforms, Geithner said," "have to be put out to the market to give investors and banks time to adjust to understand what will be the new economics of making mortgages in this country."

He said the Federal Housing Administration role should be limited; it should be supplemented with an emergency backstop that would only be deployed in crisis and available for a broader class of homeowner.

Geithner called on all the stakeholders in the housing market to study the proposals he's put forth.

"Those all have very different implications for the nature of the government's support for the vulnerability of the market in future housing crisis, future recessions," he said. "We think it's helpful for the broad set of stakeholders in the country and on the Hill to spend some time trying to fully understand the implications, the relative merits, the disadvantages of those mix of options."

Once Congress gets through its hearings on the Treasury Department's proposals, Geithner said, the administration will share thoughts on which "mix of views" make the most sense.

Many Republicans on Capitol Hill have called for an even quicker unraveling of the mortgage giants. They wanted a proposal to unwind Fannie and Freddie in the Wall Street reform bill that passed Congress last year. Geithner cautioned that the process should be slow and deliberate.

"We need to proceed carefully and gradually, not just because this is very complicated but – as you know we're still living with the traumatic damage scars caused by this recession, you see those still in housing most powerful. "

Asked if the government played to big a part in making mortgage loans more available in the years before the recession, Geithner said the government did indeed do too much.

"I think it's absolutely the case that the U.S. government provided too much support for housing, too strong incentives for investment in housing. We just took that too far."

-Tahman Bradley

User Comments

Reduce government involvement in housing?
He is so fired for saying that.

Posted by: Joe White | February 11, 2011, 11:38 am 11:38 am

I’ll bet a lot of Obama’s friends and former community agitators are going to be upset over this plan!!
They should be abolished but at the same time both State and Federal agencies need to keep a tight leash and oversight over the bankster and mortage companies for fraud, redlining, usury, etc. Courts should also demand the bankster “produce the note” before initiating any foreclosures.

Posted by: Ed | February 11, 2011, 11:55 am 11:55 am

The result will be that there can be no more adjustable rate mortgages, no more 5% down payments, and young people will have to work longer, and save more, before buying a house.
That’s actually a good thing. The problem with young people today, is they have become accustomed to having everything, now. That has, obviously, NOT worked.
Putting reality back into American lives is one of the essential changes needed, in this country.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 11, 2011, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

no gov’t assistance? how are blacks going to ever be able to buy a home then?

Posted by: hmmm | February 11, 2011, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Rick McDaniel…I am a banker (a very responsible one). This does not mean the end of adjustble rate loans at all. It means that without the government backing you will see less and less 30 year fixed rate loans. private banks/instituions shy away from “paper held for that length of time”. And if they do exist…the costs of doing those loans (in the private sector) will go up dramatically. I no way am I staunchly defending “Freddie and Fannie”…but when those type of loans ae executed properly (down payment wise and underwritten properly)…they enabled people of “lesser” means to purchase a home. If you want to understand what group of people that were most responsible for the financial mess of 2008 read “House of Cards” by William Cohen. What a fascinating and insightful book. You will learn about the “arrogance, hubris and greed” of the huge wall street firms and Banks. They were the ones responsible for subprime, lax underwriting,0% down payments and LTV’s over 100%.

Posted by: CND FOX | February 11, 2011, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

CND Fox,
Since you apparently work in some capacity or other in the banking industry, are you supportive of Geithner’s plan to phase out Freddie and Fannie?

Posted by: Joe White | February 11, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

“Joe White”…as long as it done over time so that people can adjust to the change. I never was “comfortable” with a “government entity” that also had “individual stock holders”. In my mind I never could reconcile that. Their elimination; however, will mean that people will need to get used to ARM’s (adjustable rate mortgages) again. So do I see a decline in house buying in the next 10-15 years? Yes I do. And who knows how that will “impact” our economy going forward.

Posted by: CND FOX | February 11, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

CND Fox wrote:
“I never was “comfortable” with a “government entity” that also had “individual stock holders”. In my mind I never could reconcile that. ”
So do you have the same discomfort with the Fed?

Posted by: Joe White | February 11, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

“Joe White”…LOl…the “Fed”??? No, not at all. All societies have to have a “structure” that provides vision and leadership at that level. In NO way am I an “anti-gov’t zealot or conspiracy believer”. The thing I have always learned in my life is that the biggest messes (at least in this country) are due to human greed and lack of proper regulation.

Posted by: CND FOX | February 11, 2011, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

What do you think this means for shareholders of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac? I’m hanging onto a good size chunk of stock that I picked up a great price.. and now I’m thinking I should bail out soon… any insight?

Posted by: Kathy | February 13, 2011, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.