Obama On Wisconsin Budget Protests: “An Assault On Unions”
ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports: As the third straight day of protests continue at the Wisconsin State Capitol to protest the governor’s proposal to strip public-sector employees of collective-bargaining rights, President Obama has sided with the workers.
“Some of what I've heard coming out of Wisconsin, where you're just making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain generally seems like more of an assault on unions,” President Obama said Wednesday to WTMJ TV “And I think it's very important for us to understand that public employees, they're our neighbors, they're our friends.”
Republican Governor Scott Walker has proposed a $3.6 billion budget deficit, demanding that public employees pay more for their pensions and health care – the equivalent of a 7% pay cut. But the thousands of workers protesting since Tuesday are mostly upset that the budget strips away nearly all of their union bargaining rights.
In responding to the controversy the president said it is important “not to vilify” these employees, “or to suggest somehow all these budget problems are due to public employees.”
White House press secretary Jay Carney said today that while President Obama understands the needs and the challenges that governors face to deal with their own fiscal issues and the need to make tough budget decisions, “what he sees happening in Wisconsin, making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain, seems more like an assault on unions. “
“He doesn't see that as a good thing,” Carney said, adding that it is sometimes easy to paint public employees as “faceless bureaucrats,” but emphasized these people are teachers, nurses, policemen and firemen.
“The best way to deal with this is for people to address these problems by sitting down at the table to collaborate and work out a solution.”
Speaker of the House John Boehner today credited Wisconsin’s Republican Governor Scott Walker for taking “courageous action” and “daring to speak the truth” about his state’s financial difficulties and ripped President Obama for criticizing Walker’s proposed reforms and failing to show leadership on the economy.
“Republicans in Congress – and reform-minded GOP governors like Scott Walker…are daring to speak the truth about the dire fiscal challenges Americans face at all levels of government, and daring to commit themselves to solutions that will liberate our economy and help put our citizens on a path to prosperity,” Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a statement Thursday. “I’m disappointed that instead of providing similar leadership from the White House, the president has chosen to attack leaders such as Gov. Walker, who are listening to the people and confronting problems that have been neglected for years at the expense of jobs and economic growth.”
-Sunlen Miller
Email
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
Ron Paul Ad's Call Santorum a 'Fake'
ASSAULT, Assault, assault…?
Whoa, watch the tone, Mr. President.
Posted by: Bo, PWD | February 17, 2011, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Obama does not see public employee unions as “faceless bureaucrats”. He sees them as big huge political donors.
Posted by: MayBee | February 17, 2011, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Why on earth should the middle class pay for the $140 million that Walker has given to his corporate buddies? There was a surplus until he got into office.
Posted by: Wisconsinite | February 17, 2011, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
It always amuses me to see these unionites claim that they are “entitled” to better working conditions than the average American in the private sector. Heck, the conditions they will be going to are far better than most of those in the private sector. They complain that they would have to contribute to their pension. So what – don’t they realize how lucky they are to even have a pension in the first place? Most people don’t have one to contribute to at all!
And then they complain about having to (for the first time it appears) pay into their health insurance plan. Again, welcome to the past 20-plus years in the private sector. Why should you be any different.
And even this new law will pretty much guarantee raises based on inflation. Funny, my wife’s private sector company didn’t give out raises for two straight years. An inflation raise would have been nice.
But no – if you are part of a union, you just expect to be treated differently for some unknown reason. Especially those who make their livings off of tax dollars … you expect to just keep milking and milking and milking us, taking more tax dollars each year as if money grows on trees. Look, I sort of get unions for private-sector work, but when it comes to the public sector, it makes no logical sense.
Now, I’m not putting all of the blame on public sector employees. It’s not all your fault that your state and federal governments have spent far more than they take in to get us in this situation. And we still need to fund our many fine teachers, police and fire staff, etc. as they do great work. But you have to realize you – like the rest of us in the private sector – have to do your part to help reduce these insane deficits. And you can start by realizing your right to quality employment is no different than your private-sector neighbor … and you shouldn’t expect special treatment!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Obama sides with greedy unions who are bankrupting the states. No surprise there.
Posted by: patrick | February 17, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Isn’t it weird that teachers are becoming the “boogy man”?
Here are a few things that I keep thinking about:
1. All we’ve been hearing about since “Waiting for Superman” and other exposes on our education system (which is mediocre internationally) is we have a hard time getting rid of bad teachers and they are the ones holding down our educational system.
2. In a free market, people will be moved by incentives, not by altruism.
3. Now the same people griping about the burden of bad teachers and tout the principles of a free market want to take incentives away from teachers.
So my question is… how will this bring better teaching candidates into the profession? I want my daughters to be taught by quality teachers, not teachers who tried but couldn’t get a better paying job as a desk jockey at Dunder Mifflin.
Posted by: Charlie S | February 17, 2011, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
One thing unionized public employees love to forget is that the money they demand is from their “neighbors and friends”, that in effect when they unionized it is not against the government they protest, but against everyone that pays for it and against their own country men. So it really does not matter what the value of the service is that they provide. A unionized public employee has chosen loyalty to a workers union and their own paycheck over loyalty to their own country men and the ultimate union to which they give lip service in the pledge of allegiance the UNITED States to which their state is a member. It inevitably is a “screw you I want mine” mentality and there is no escaping that.
Posted by: Cheesehead | February 17, 2011, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
How come teachers, Janitors, firefighters and police became the root of our problems? was it them who gambled with granys money? Since when the workers became the enemy? This is an assault on the American worker. We will be left with a Patronage system akin to the Roman empire which only has like a 1% Patron and 99% poor peasants and clients who look up to the beneficence of the elites. No middle class! Wow.
Posted by: Zazu | February 17, 2011, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
How come teachers, Janitors, firefighters and police became the root of our problems? was it them who gambled with granys money? Since when the workers became the enemy? This is an assault on the American worker.
Posted by: Zazu
They aren’t the root, but by expecting your neighbor to keep emptying his/her pockets to pay benefits (and in many cases, salaries) that far exceed that of the private sector, they become part of the problem. This legislation goes a long way in at least eliminating this part of the problem. You don’t stop here, but it is a big part of it.
Remember – these employees are not being paid by the state, they are being paid by their neighbor’s taxes …. and their neighbors have voted people into office to make legislation like this!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
there is a BIG difference between unions of employees “against” private companies and unions “against” the State (i.e., the tax-payers.) The State workers already enjoy so many before benefits and protections than the normal person in the private sector. And the normal person pays their salary, pensions, days-off, benefits, etc! If anything State workers should have LESS bargaining power than private employees.
Posted by: Ed | February 17, 2011, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Oh and the best part, for having to deal with this legislation, teachers for one are guaranteed that there will be no layoffs. Oh, I feel SOOOOOO bad for you.
Try finding THAT in the private sector. Grow up, realize how good you have it and stop complaining.
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
There is NO MONEY LEFT…Those few with jobs can no longer shoulder the burden, tax, alone….Everyone is hurting and everyone has to sacrifice equally and share the burden including union and state workers, federal workers, private sector workers..wasn’t that the ideology of the Left…everyone equal…equal sacrifice??? Protest all you want..Money Tree for raises and bonuses is Gone for everyone….Just the VERY THANKFUL you have a job….Stop Crying..
Posted by: Parallex View | February 17, 2011, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Although everyone regrets making tough decisions President Obama puts his finger up to determine the direction of the wind and takes the easy position! Maybe the President should take notes on what real leadership is!
Posted by: Voice_Reason | February 17, 2011, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
I have a few comments.
1. Public employees are NOT paid more than their private counterparts. In fact, recent 3rd party studies have shown they are actaully compensated an average of 8.2% less on total than their equal private sector counterparts.
2. There were $100 million in concessions the public employee unions were willing to make, which included paying more into retirement and more into health benefits, but Walker wouldn’t even consider it.
3. Most people are most concerned about the fact that they will no longer have a say in their working conditions, something WI has fought for for over 50 years.
Posted by: Grow Up | February 17, 2011, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Luckily, this is not happening in DC with the teachers calling in sick and all and not teaching class. The president’s kids wouldn’t be able to go to school and learn anything.
Posted by: Icare | February 17, 2011, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Is there any truth to the rumor that union members were bussed from Chicago to protest in Madison? If so it sounds like Chicago politics!
Posted by: Voice_Reason | February 17, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Auh….12.6 percent contribution to health care…5.6 percent contribution to pension plan….Breakin my heart…Recent 3rd party study…..by whom…….
Posted by: Parallex View | February 17, 2011, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Another beer summit is in order as the President opens his mouth without all of the facts!!!
Posted by: Voice_Reason | February 17, 2011, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Until teachers start contributing to the cost of their healthcare and their pensions, their protests are juvenile. Teachers get more time off than anyone in the private sector and can attain the protection of tenure. And if their job depended upon performance like it does in the private sector, many of them would not currently have a job. Let alone having the protection of not getting laid off at a moment’s notice. So many teachers say they are teachers for the sake of the children. How does protesting instead of doing your job affect the ‘sake of the children’? Bluntly put, grow up and join the reality of today the rest of us are contending with.
Posted by: Lass | February 17, 2011, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
how will this bring better teaching candidates into the profession?
Posted by: Charlie S |
It won’t. The unions have no interest in that.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 17, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
What has happened to majority rule in this country. I was the voters that elected their representatives and it is those representatives that created and are ready to pass this bill. The unions need to get out of democracy’s way.
Posted by: Mike | February 17, 2011, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
So Wisconsin gets it AND they have the power to do something about it. And the dems make like Georgy Porgy trailing their national socialism behind them like tp stuck on their shoe as they flee the state.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 17, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
ABC is obviously an arm of the Obama administration and the Democrats. The actual headline of this should be “Obama sides with the Public Employees Union!” Why is it that an organization like ABC can be so disingenuous? Rhetorical question!
Posted by: FanDaElis | February 17, 2011, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Of course he sides with the unions, they bought and paid for his Presidence.
Posted by: Freedom | February 17, 2011, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Democrats in Wisconsin are paying the price for their low turnout in the last election. They may learn the error of their ways in time for 2012 however.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Jake is one of the few in the media who actually gets this story right – as he says above, “Republican Governor Scott Walker has proposed a $3.6 billion budget deficit”
Most people don’t hear from the media that the “financial difficulties” that Boehner speaks of are ENTIRELY created by Walker.
Last month, Wisconsin state’s fiscal bureau — the Wisconsin equivalent of the Congressional Budget Office — concluded that Wisconsin isn’t even in need of austerity measures, and could conclude the fiscal year with a surplus.
The current budget shortfall is 100% caused by Walker – and thank you Jake for telling the truth!
Posted by: Flash Override | February 17, 2011, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Wisunion acts like a socialist state. That is why Obama loves Wisconsin.
Posted by: Sharon Zirn | February 17, 2011, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
I paid for my own retirement. I paid for my own healthcare. ALL of it. Why should people like me be expected to fund the unions employee benefits? Are they all willing to chip in each month and pay mine??? I do a lousy job I get fired. I have very little sympathy for the unions problems. Cry me a river.
Posted by: Edward80 | February 17, 2011, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Of course Obama sides with the unions-they are the ones that put him in office! They gave his campaign millions.When Obama began the Healthcare rant and the Unions thought they would HAVE to take his insurance, I seen on TV the head of the AFL-CIO went to the WH and had a talk with him, and he said he told Obama if they had to take the insurance they would let him know what they thought at the polls and LO and Behold! They were EXEMPT from taking the Healthcare. Got to keep their Cadillac plans! Now, isn’t that special? It’s over 700 different union groups and some large corporations and congress that are exempt now! The tax payers pay the pensions for the Unions and they pay a small amount for their insurance. Talk about a “nanny” state of affairs-that is it! Glad Como, Christie, Jerry Brown and now the Gov. of Wisconsin is letting them know they need to pay their fair share like the rest of us!!!
Posted by: TXAR.55 | February 17, 2011, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“They may learn the error of their ways in time for 2012 however.”
The public employee unions are learning the error of their ways, and it’s high time they did. Pass the popcorn.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Putting aside the fact that state governments are going broke… maybe there would be more sympathy for teachers if American students were getting an even mediocre education.
Posted by: cindy | February 17, 2011, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
For those who are misinformed, listen carefully.
1. Just so you know, teachers do NOT get paid time off. Teachers are paid for 180 days. Period. We are not paid during the summer. If we elect to spread our paychecks out we are simply getting paid over time for work already done.
2. We DO pay for our healthcare and pension. Teachers are on the bottom in terms of salary compared to all other 4-year degree careers. We pay for our healthcare and pension through our low salaries.
3. This is NOT about the money. It is about our rights as citizens of this formerly democratic country. Governor Walker wants to take away our right to negotiate.
4. Please, when did we become the enemy? We dedicate our lives to the children of this county. We love our students. We became teachers to make a difference in the lives of your children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and neighbors. My heart aches at all the negative comments. Why do so many have such anger and resentment towards the very people who have dedicated their lives to the young children of this country?
Posted by: ProudTeacher | February 17, 2011, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
The claim that the $3.6 Billion deficit is 100% Walker’s fault is patent falsehood.
September 10, 2010:
“Madison — The state faces a looming $2.7 billion budget shortfall, but that hasn’t kept candidates for governor from piling on with what are likely to be hundreds of millions of dollars in new commitments to cut taxes or increase spending.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, signer of the Wagner Act, 1937:
“… Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the government. All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations … The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for … officials … to bind the employer … The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives …
“Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of government employees. Upon employees in the federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people … This obligation is paramount … A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent … to prevent or obstruct … Government … Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government … is unthinkable and intolerable.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Posted by: Mike | Feb 17, 2011 6:58:37 PM “The unions need to get out of democracy’s way.” Mike, the unions are part of a democracy. Unions already fought on YOUR behalf for a 40-hour work week, workplace safety regulations, child labor laws, and sick leave. Teachers are not “thugs” or unwilling to sit down for a discussion about what’s right for the state.
However, since Gov. Walker entered office, the state slashed tax revenue in favor of his campaign contributors, Big Business. He has simply refused to negotiate with state employees.
The extreme Right is at WAR with education and labor – this is the tea soaked mindset of those who want to eliminate the Department of Education – the mindset of those who forced removal of Thomas Jefferson from Texas textbooks.
The ultimate goal is destruction of ALL unions, re-distribution of public funds for religious school options, and compliant cheap labor for the free market.
So who AGAIN is expected to pay? Teachers, students, and middle class workers. This is Gov. Walker’s clear attempt to break a union’s right to collectively bargain for benefits and working conditions – one more step in the war against education and labor.
Posted by: green.goddess | February 17, 2011, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
At least one protester has a sign with a picture of Gov. Walker with a crosshair over his face, with “RELOAD” stenciled in large latters. I am sure Paul Krugman will express his outrage tomorrow.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Teachers, please stop crying about your “low” salaries. In many communities across this nation (including my hometown), teachers are among the most well-to-do. You get paid very well overall compared to your neighbors AND you only work 180 days. I’m not saying you don’t earn your paycheck, or that you don’t do a great service for the communities you live in – what I am saying is, you have to share the bad times of your community as well. Governments are in the red, you can’t expect automatic raises and fully paid pensions (like in Wisconsin) when this is the case.
The Wisconsin teacher union head today was talking about a teacher earning $52,000 having to take a hit by paying into a pension if this law goes through. It took me 17 years in the private sector to make that much – and that’s above what most people make in this country.
Stop complaining! Look around you, realize your lot in life is pretty cool compared to many around you, and be happy for your situation! I mean, in Wisconsin, the governor is forgoing layoffs by doing this. Sounds like a good deal to me!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Alyson- the NFL player’s union is set for a labor show down this year.
Of course they are going to be pro-union on this.
Posted by: MayBee | February 17, 2011, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
The DNC is paying these protestors.
Paying to bus them in.
That’s pretty embarrassing.
Posted by: MayBee | February 17, 2011, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
“The state faces a looming $2.7 billion budget shortfall”
Why? “Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) portrays his union-busting plan as an austerity measure in the midst of a severe state budget crisis. But if you step back for a moment and think about it, taking away state employees’ collective bargaining rights is unlikely to pay immediate short-term dividends for the state budget. If you take another step back and look at what — or more to the point who — created this budget crisis in the first place, it starts to show what a naked union-busting move Walker is making. “
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
“These public workers are Wisconsin’s champions every single day and we urge the Governor and the State Legislature to not take away their rights.”
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 8:07:27 PM
Seems the voters in your state have urged the Governor and the State Legislature to make your state more fiscally responsible!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
“These public workers are Wisconsin’s champions every single day and we urge the Governor and the State Legislature to not take away their rights.”
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 8:07:27 PM
Seems the voters in your state have urged the Governor and the State Legislature to make your state more fiscally responsible!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Posted by: MayBee | Feb 17, 2011 8:09:32 PM
Of course. Because unions,collective bargaining and basic workers’ rights are as American as baseball and American football. It’s about workers rights. Of course.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Seems the voters in your state have urged the Governor and the State Legislature to make your state more fiscally responsible!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | Feb 17, 2011 8:11:35 PM
It’s not my state, french fries. And if they wanted fiscal responsibility they wouldn’t have voted in this yahoo. He’s a mess and he is the one responsible for ginning up the budget shortfall.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Feb 17, 2011 8:01:40 PM
Funny that you’re seeing all these tea party-esque signs. Who knew tea partiers would actually have the chutzpah to protest taking away workers’ rights. I thought they were a bit more confused and hypocritical than consistent. I don’t really believe you without a source, though, as all the signs I’ve seen have been along the lines of “Walk like an Egyptian,” “If you can read this sign, thank a teacher”, “Kill the bill”, “Hail Emperor Walker,” “Workers rights are human rights”… etc.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
It’s not my state, french fries. And if they wanted fiscal responsibility they wouldn’t have voted in this yahoo. He’s a mess and he is the one responsible for ginning up the budget shortfall.
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 8:16:05 PM
Well milk shake, you seem to know an awful lot about Wisconsin for someone who doesn’t live there. Stop complaining union workers – you have it better than most, even when you’re asked to give something back.
And for the last time, public workers should not have the right to get a CBA! You are living off tax dollars, not private company profits. You’re expecting your neighbor to foot your bill, while your neighbor is in dire straits. It’s kinda like welfare in a way.
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
It’s not my state, french fries. And if they wanted fiscal responsibility they wouldn’t have voted in this yahoo. He’s a mess and he is the one responsible for ginning up the budget shortfall.
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 8:16:05 PM
Well milk shake, you seem to know an awful lot about Wisconsin for someone who doesn’t live there. Stop complaining union workers – you have it better than most, even when you’re asked to give something back.
And for the last time, public workers should not have the right to get a CBA! You are living off tax dollars, not private company profits. You’re expecting your neighbor to foot your bill, while your neighbor is in dire straits. It’s kinda like welfare in a way.
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Here’s a thought…How about, TAX PAYERS RIGHTS…..
Posted by: Parallex View | February 17, 2011, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
“Putting aside the fact that state governments are going broke… maybe there would be more sympathy for teachers if American students were getting an even mediocre education.”
You hit the nail on the head, Cindy. Since the Department of Education was created, test scores have been flat. We keep falling behind and they keep saying we need to spend more money on education. Maybe if we get rid of tenure, have more quality controls, and allow teachers to actually discipline children again, we would start seeing some improvement. Until then, don’t whine to me about how you want my taxes to pay for your free health care and pensions.
Posted by: Jose | February 17, 2011, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
“you seem to know an awful lot about Wisconsin for someone who doesn’t live there.”
And you seem to know very little but you’re weighing in anyway. I’ll stick with my way.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
“Mike, the unions are part of a democracy. Unions already fought on YOUR behalf for a 40-hour work week, workplace safety regulations, child labor laws, and sick leave.” – GG
Okay, great. Job well done. Now we have laws for most of that. Unions are no longer needed.
Posted by: Jose | February 17, 2011, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Well, luckily for us Alyson, most of us are going against your way … you know, socialism!
Let the free market determine salaries and benefits! That way – for teachers at least – maybe we’ll actually get some consistent quality for our money. Unions preserve BAD teachers, it’s a fact. What other industry does this happen in? Bad employees of private companies become unemployed, as they should. Why so different w/ teachers, or other unionites? We’re not getting value for our tax dollars … yet you want more and more and more and more ….
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Obama sides with the unions? Big surprise. We’ll deal with you in Nov 2012, bud. We need a renaissance in this country, and the WI guv is going to set an earth-shaking precedent, I hope. Up with personal accountability, down with anachronistic, socialist constructs such as unions!!
Posted by: Brad | February 17, 2011, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
We watched Egypt citizens take back their country, now the World gets to see US citizens get back their State. Obama is President of the United States and has only an opinion but the elected Republican Law Makers have voiced their support of the Wiscosin Govenor. Now some might think differently as this protest is moving to other States. Boehner is looking to shut down the Government an allow millions to lost work and let’s see how it feels when the Banks, post office, SSI and all federal agency are closed. It happen before when Republicans pulled the same thing on then President Clinton. Yes all those in favor started yelling at the GOP. Well if you don’t learn you often repeat the same mistakes and now with the GOP in the majority it could happen.
Posted by: Jackie | February 17, 2011, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
We watched Egypt citizens take back their country, now the World gets to see US citizens get back their State. Obama is President of the United States and has only an opinion but the elected Republican Law Makers have voiced their support of the Wiscosin Govenor. Now some might think differently as this protest is moving to other States. Boehner is looking to shut down the Government an allow millions to lost work and let’s see how it feels when the Banks, post office, SSI and all federal agency are closed. It happen before when Republicans pulled the same thing on then President Clinton. Yes all those in favor started yelling at the GOP. Well if you don’t learn you often repeat the same mistakes and now with the GOP in the majority it could happen.
Posted by: Jackie | February 17, 2011, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
“Well, luckily for us Alyson, most of us are going against your way .”
Actually, your suggestion (and I agreed) was that my way was being informed, and I agree that I am, and many are not. And those who aren’t call all disagreement with their ideology or talking points socialism or communism because it is easier than actually being informed.
I suggest you revisit history or countries with no workers rights. Workers rights and basic human rights are about freedom from tyranny.
FYI, the private sector has unions as well. The NFL players and Green Bay packers who support the protestors and workers who are being screwed over in Wisconsin are privately employed, and also union.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Union thug resorts to violence:
“MADISON, Wis. (AP) – Police have hand-cuffed a protester at the state Capitol after he apparently tried to charge into the state Assembly.”
Anyone who isn’t afraid to confront the actual facts can go to HotAir right now and see the charming signs.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
These workers, under Walker’s plan, would have the right to bargain collectively for their wages. They simply wouldn’t be able to loot the taxpayers for the health and pension benefits.
Of course, before 1959 they had no right to collectively bargain at all–quite a tyrrany that was, Wisconsin in 1958.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Alyson, I beg to differ that you are informed. At least, not enough.
I called you a socialist, because that’s what you are. You are advocating for bigger government, at the expense of the private taxpayer. I’m sorry if that offends you, but it’s the truth.
What you and your unionite friends don’t want to face is that you have to sacrifice just like the rest of us now, and you don’t want to. You just want us to raise taxes on everyone just so people like you don’t have to pay into a pension, that is nonexistent for most private-sector workers anyways.
We already have laws in this country protecting basic labor rights (40-hour work week, etc.). Sure, unions brought a lot of that on, at a time when they were necessary. They no longer are! This isn’t “The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair anymore!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Funny how unions and democrats want to slow down and negotiate now. I didn’t see the same enthusiasm for our constitution when Obama and his constituents rammed that massive health care bill down our throats. And that was 1/6th of our whole economy changed overnight. Perhaps some more thought should have gone into that before we just flooded our healthcare system with millions of uninsured. Now it’s time to pay up. Too bad, so sad.
Posted by: Brian | February 17, 2011, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
When I asked the other day if the left could do anything to make public education worse in this country I didn’t expect an answer.
When President Barack Obama spotlighted a successful school in his State of the Union speech, he picked Bruce Randolph School in Denver.
“Take a school like Bruce Randolph in Denver,” the president said. “Three years ago, it was rated one of the worst schools in Colorado. Last May, 97 percent of seniors received their diploma.”
Well someone actually did journalism and reports…
“Bruce Randolph was a middle school when it opened in 2002. In 2007, Denver Public Schools gave Bruce Randolph School permission to operate autonomously. It was the first school in the state to be granted autonomy from district and union rules.
Each teacher then had to reapply for his or her job. A published report said only six teachers remained.”
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 17, 2011, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Obama needs to be more like FDR:
FDR: Public-sector unions must not be allowed to strike
Professor Daniel DaSalvo notes President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s opposition to public-sector unions with the right to strike.
Even President Franklin Roosevelt, a friend of private-sector unionism, drew a line when it came to government workers: “Meticulous attention,” the president insisted in 1937, “should be paid to the special relations and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the Government….The process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service.”
The reason? FDR believed that “[a] strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to obstruct the operations of government until their demands are satisfied. Such action looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it is unthinkable and intolerable.”
Blocked reforms. Workers in a free market economy should have the right to bargain collectively, but as FDR observed, extending that right to the public sector presents big problems, especially with the right to strike. I believe that much of the trouble with government unions could be solved with free competition and spending caps, but the truth is, unions have blocked most such reforms to protect their bargaining power.
We don’t want soldiers and sailors going on strike when our elected representatives order them lawfully into action. Most elected officials agree on this point, but then they ignore the problem of union power over other public-sector jobs.
We don’t want teachers using certification hurdles and the mandatory 180-day school year as leverage to demand unfairly high wages and benefits. We don’t want public-sector union contracts that make it impossible to measure whether each worker works, and impossible to fire employees who aren’t needed.
Raises without end. We don’t want elected officials lulled into codependent contracts that give unionized government workers irrationally generous compensation with the understanding that the unions will repay the officeholders with pay-back votes, campaign contributions or Election Day get-out-the-vote activities.
We really don’t want to hear unionized public-sector workers talking pompously about their “public service” when their paychecks, medical care and pensions amount to double the compensation of the private-sector workers who have to pay most of the public-sector bills. (That only stirs sentiment for a private parity tax.)
In short, we want public-sector employment realigned with the real world. We want a more limited public sector with workers genuinely dedicated to public service, not to serving themselves.
End of illusion. With unions to encourage them, many public-sector employees have lived far too long under the illusion their pay will rise and their jobs will stay no matter what happens to the rest of the economy. That never made sense, not under FDR, not now.
Frank Warner
Posted by: Giovanni Forotondo | February 17, 2011, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
SENATE DEMOCRATS FOUND — AT A RESORT IN ILLINOIS!
Typical of the lowlife radical democrats..keep spending the states money and not showing up for work because they are cowards
Obama Policy: insert spoon. stir.. wait till it boils, and watch for the meltdown of America
Posted by: Yep I said that | February 17, 2011, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
“I’m sorry if that offends you, but it’s the truth.”
It doesn’t offend me at all though you don’t have enough information to make an informed decision and as it turns out you are inaccurate. I’m a civil libertarian and believe in human rights including worker’s rights. There’s no way for you to determine one way or another from what I’ve said here whether or not I’m for big government. I’d suggest I’m for smaller government than most Republicans as I’m against the surveillance state and many subsidies Republicans support.
I believe both public and private sector employees should be able to negotiate and collectively bargain. That doesn’t mean that they will always get what they want, but the demonizing of teachers and other public workers that comes from the right does make me vomit a little in my mouth, particularly when it tends to come from those not fit to wipe the boots of my garbage collector.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Posted by: Yep I said that | Feb 17, 2011 9:11:56 PM
Since I grew up in Rockford, it amuses me immensely that the Clock Tower Inn Best Western there is being called a resort. You’ve been lied to by very shoddy reporters.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Obama’s group Organizing for America is front and center in Wisconsin stirring up protesting. Government employees should not be unionized because of the capability of shutting down government. These employees need to answer to their boss the taxpayer and not follow the communist union leaders in lockstep. With a 3.6 bil dollar shortfall these employees need to step up to the plate and make concessions. The private sector makes on average 1/2 of what public unions make per year in wages and benefits and should be greatful not greedy during these difficult times. The teachers dragging students into the protests in my estimation constitutes child abuse. The Dems who left the state to avoid the vote should be fired for job abandonment and failure to follow the oath of office.
Posted by: Downwithsocialism | February 17, 2011, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
I called you a socialist, because that’s what you are. You are advocating for bigger government, at the expense of the private taxpayer. I’m sorry if that offends you, but it’s the truth
————————–
You people don’t even know what socialism is. We’re arguing about marginal changes in the balance between social programs and free enterprise in a mixed economy like ours…not abolishing free markets. So what do you claim to be, a capitalist? Do you propose we privatize our completely government owned and operated armed forces?
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Police Hunt Wisconsin Lawmakers Who Skip Union Vote
Throw these radical left wing democrats in jail
Obama VS America
Posted by: Yep I said that | February 17, 2011, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
SEIU will have to do a better job of community organizing to get more Democrats in Wisconsin elected in 2012. This is embarrassing for Pres Barry and the United States.
The Wisconsin Democrats that left the state hopefully are spending their own money hiding from the Wisconsin police at that resort in Illinois.
Posted by: bl | February 17, 2011, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Posted by: Giovanni Forotondo | Feb 17, 2011 9:02:59 PM
According to those who call themselves “conservatives” in this country, then and now, whatever that means, FDR was a socialist commie dictator-tyrant who nearly destroyed the country. Am I to believe you quote him extensively on a regular basis?
Yeah, sure.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Since I grew up in Rockford, it amuses me immensely that the Clock Tower Inn Best Western there is being called a resort. You’ve been lied to by very shoddy reporters.
Posted by: Alyson
—————————————–
the fact that they are even there, shows their radical left wing extremism and, there resolve to destroy their state. they should be removed from office for deriliction of duty
But what can we say, it just shows the credibility and anti americanism of left wing extremist…
Posted by: Yep I said that | February 17, 2011, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
This is an excellent opportunity for the public to learn something about unions and collective bargaining.
First, there is no constitutional right to such bargaining–it is granted by legislative act, initially the federal Wagner Act in 1935. It did not grant that right to public employees, for reasons addressed by FDR.
Second, it is useful to distinguish between workers in the private sector and public employees. In the former, the workers and management bargain with each other over how to share the company’s profits. In the latter, there are no profits, only taxpayer dollars, and the taxpayers are only indirectly represented at the table. The people with whom the union is negotiation are not bargaining with their own money.
Federal workers were not permitted collective bargaining until JFK granted them that right by Executive Order.
The way this all plays out is that the union members give a portion of their salaries–which are 100% taxpayer dollars–to the union, which in turn rewards with campaign contributions legislators who grant lavish union benefits.
It’s a corrupt bargain. And it’s going to come to an end in Wisconsin.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
I know this post will get a lot of personal attacks but the facts are that MY state voted on “right to work” 7 years ago. You no longer have to be a union member to work anywhere. No the sky didn’t fall. In fact we were voted by Forbes as the “most recession proof” state in the 50. Seems Oklahoma knew the way all along. You gotta laugh at the bankrupt east and west coast , not to mention dem controlled Illinois that raised tax 60% LOL. SUCKERS !!
Posted by: scoty | February 17, 2011, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
The teacher benefits will be paid for (partially) by the teachers, or the public-employee layoffs will begin. It’s that simple.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Proud Teacher……no one is saying YOU are the enemy. My understanding is that this country as a whole is BROKE. Where do you suppose we should come up with the money to pay for all the benefits most private sector employees DON’T have? An average $55K salary PLUS benefits is not a bad deal. Maybe you don’t start out that high but when your raises are automatic (not performance based) it adds up. When teachers are BAD teachers, they don’t get fired, they get tenure. They also get a pension for life. Why shouldn’t you pay more into your own retirement since most all private sector employees pay for ALL of their own. Either way, we are all in this together and we have to find a way to pay for it. No one is trying to take away your rights, but maybe expecting union employees to live by the same rules the rest of America has to live by is not asking too much.
There are two sides to this story. No one really cares about the unions anymore, they are out dated power mongers. We have laws in place now to protect workers, we have lawyers and courts to protect your rights. Unions just want to be able to influence polititians and exempt themselves from rules everyone else has to follow. That is the real argument.
Posted by: Edward80 | February 17, 2011, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Its only natural this MJARXIST PRESIDENT fake as he is would side that way .
Posted by: Raymoind | February 17, 2011, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Obama-founded OFA spearheading effort to defeat bill…
OBAMA———VS——–AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | February 17, 2011, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
SENATE DEMOCRATS FOUND — AT A RESORT IN ILLINOIS!
Posted by: Yep I said that | Feb 17, 2011 9:11:56 PM
Since I grew up in Rockford, it amuses me immensely that the Clock Tower Inn Best Western there is being called a resort. You’ve been lied to by very shoddy reporters.
Posted by: Alyson |
They told us they could see Russia from the sky lounge.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 17, 2011, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Posted by: Yep I said that | Feb 17, 2011 9:31:53 PM
The resolve to destroy the state lies with Walker. He ginned up and exploited a budget crisis for ideological reasons, and Americans are standing up for their rights. The response which he has received was self-inflicted. He’s reaped what he’s sown. the blame lies solely with him. I’m glad the Dems have shown some chutzpah.
It is an assault on unions and spin aside, let’s be clear, unions represent hard working middle class Americans who make this country great. btw, those benefits for Wisconsin’s state workers weren’t stolen. Far from it. They were negotiated by elected officials and can be re-negotiated.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
What it is known is “vilification and demonization” of human beings that most people know nothing about. And it is the type of “strategy” that the GOP and conservatives have practiced (especially at local levels) for more than two decades. It is so “common place” that the “robots” think of it as ‘reality, which it clearly is not. There is a “proper way” and “improper way” to do this …and once again the GOP (Scott Walker) has chosen to chose the latter. What everyone in the GOP mobfanatic mentality forgets is that these are middle class people who pump money back into the economy. Does the situation in Wisconsin have to change? Yes. Is this the way to do it…absolutely not. It is divisive, It is very negative. And yes the President is right. It is a direct “assault” on fellow human beings.
Posted by: CND FOX | February 17, 2011, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
the union members give a portion of their salaries–which are 100% taxpayer dollars–to the union, which in turn rewards with campaign contributions legislators who grant lavish union benefits.
It’s a corrupt bargain
—————-
But lobbyists are not?
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
What else would blowhard Obama say?? — He is SO tight with the unions he better not stop suddenly or four or five of the brown-nosers will be running into his backside!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | February 17, 2011, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
They told us they could see Russia from the sky lounge.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Feb 17, 2011 9:40:14 PM
Tina Fey as Sarah Palin on SNL is doing the reporting (?)
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Lobbyists are not paid with taxpayer dollars, nor are their pensins and benefits funded by taxpayers.
Why is the Wisconsin mob so white?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Taxpayer dollars are the same as customer dollars when paying for government services.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
““Walker was not forced into a budget repair bill by circumstances beyond he control,” says Jack Norman, research director at the Institute for Wisconsin Future — a public interest think tank. “He wanted a budget repair bill and forced it by pushing through tax cuts… so he could rush through these other changes.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
“To the extent that there is an imbalance — Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit — it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January.
…the fiscal bureaus report … holds that “more than half” of the new shortfall comes from three of Walker’s initiatives”
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
“Apparently this fellow [Walker]drank enough tea in the last few months to get the impression that he would be immune from any political blowback if he paid off his political cronies with money extorted from public workers. I suspect he won’t be the last GOP blowhard to get some reality therapy in the coming months.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Alyson—Unions represent UNIONS. We are nothing but pawns in their game. They care about individuals as much as dems did when they forced healthscam thtough.
Posted by: scoty | February 17, 2011, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Alyson, your posts here today remind me of that famous Reagan quote, “Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.”
You are absolutely advocating for socialism, and you don’t even realize it. You’re advocating for more taxes on the private sector to fund more public jobs. Spreading the wealth if you will.
What Walker is doing is making sure the cuts he makes now in the public sector (by having them pay a little for their pensions and health insurance) aren’t “bargained” back in at a later date. What’s the point in making the cuts if they will just be made up for elsewhere later. The cuts have to be made.
And, he’s forgoing layoffs as a result, and tying raises with inflation. In a sense, guaranteeing raises for these public employees. Sounds like a pretty good gig when compared to the private sector, where you have to work hard for your promotions and pay.
In the public sector, outstanding employees are not celebrated, and bad ones are defended tooth and nail. What kind of backwards system is that?? Why – WHY – on earth would an outstanding teacher not want to be recognized for it, rather than seeing the poor teacher down the hall make the same salary, w/ no recourse for removing that teacher??
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
loyalopposition—the “blowback” is coming from a blowhard in the white house. Ordinary citizens support this , or will you need another lesson in 2012.
Posted by: scoty | February 17, 2011, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Alyson —— Walker “paid off his political cronies with money extorted from public workers.” —– Wow, probably the weirdest stretch of reality… tinged in absurdity… with a slight dusting of abstract sinility!!! —— Walker won 52% to 46% of the WI vote for him to do just this!!! — He is “cleaning up the mess” of the last Democrat Governor!!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | February 17, 2011, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | Feb 17, 2011 10:13:35 PM
Yeah, it looks all cleaned up, doesn’t it? Not messy at all.
“To the extent that there is an imbalance — Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit — it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January.”
It is an assault on unions and spin aside, let’s be clear, unions represent hard working middle class Americans who make this country great. btw, those benefits for Wisconsin’s state workers weren’t stolen. Far from it. They were negotiated by elected officials and can be re-negotiated.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
President Obama needs to call off his union thugs from visiting the homes of Republican politicians in Wisconsin and DC. This attempt at intimidation needs to stop.
His recent call for civility are just empty words unless he speaks to this disturbing tactic by his union goons.
Posted by: Bo, PWD | February 17, 2011, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Five and a half million Wisconsin people people are supporting these parasites. Teachers need to get in the “REAL WORLD.” Taxpayers are fed-up with supporting these losers. A 25 year retired elementary teacher from Cleveland.
Posted by: Manitu | February 17, 2011, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
“Working Man???? Small business people are not working people? ARE ONLY UNION MEMBERS WORKING MEN AND WOMEN? WHAT A BUNCH OF BULL!!! Teachers need to go back to work. Period!!
Posted by: Manitu | February 17, 2011, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
“In the public sector, outstanding employees are not celebrated, and bad ones are defended tooth and nail. What kind of backwards system is that??”
The mythical system as described in Righty World.
“WHY – on earth would an outstanding teacher not want to be recognized for it, rather than seeing the poor teacher down the hall make the same salary”
-And the right-wing solution: cut all their salaries to match the production of the poorest teachers….that’ll give all the outstanding teachers plenty of incentive to stick around.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
when public union bargain with tax payers money, it’s not the same thing as that in private sector. the bargain would only result tax payers money to be redistributed to some public employees while others are paying more for it but no control over it. it might be the time we restrict such bargain because it’s tax payers money and we have to have a say to it.
Posted by: sabniz | February 17, 2011, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
“It is an assault on unions and spin aside, let’s be clear, unions represent hard working middle class Americans who make this country great. ”
Not so much. There are 14.7 million unionized workers in the US. Over half of them (7.6 million) are in public employee unions. There are over 100 million taxpayers.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
scoty — Huh? —- The GOP governor has been voted into office to do just this work!! —- Obama’s most frequent visitor to the white house his first tow years wa a UNION boss!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | February 17, 2011, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Alyson, your posts here today remind me of that famous Reagan quote… etc.
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | Feb 17, 2011 10:11:44 PM
I’m not sure why as I wasn’t Reagan’s liberal friend and I’m not yours either so that makes the quote entirely irrelevant.
What I’m advocating for is rights. Workers rights. The rights of hardworking middle class Americans.
Walker ginned up and exploited a budget crisis for ideological reasons, and Americans are standing up for their rights. The response which he has received was self-inflicted. He’s reaped what he’s sown. the blame lies solely with him. I’m glad the Dems have shown some chutzpah.
Those benefits for Wisconsin’s state workers weren’t stolen, btw. Far from it. They were negotiated by elected officials and can be re-negotiated.
You are right that Walker wants to take away the right to negotiate and renegotiate. That is why he is being referred to as an imperialist and king in the signage of the protestors. What’s next after you pay off your cronies with money extorted from public workers after exploiting a self-made crisis?
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
“There are 14.7 million unionized workers in the US”
And you’re claiming they aren’t hard working Americans? Tell your neighborhood cop and firefighters that. I’m sure they’ll really appreciate it.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Here’s a real-world example of how unions can promote poor output. My daughter is in kindergarten this year at a school w/ five kindergarten teachers. After talking w/ friends and other parents over the last two years, we got a good feel for which of them were good, and which were not. The general consensus was, one was great, three were average to good, and one was awful. And we had a personal experience w/ the awful one as her daughter was in a dance class w/ my daughter. Just a regular grouch of a person.
Anyhow, my daughter was lucky to get the great one. Our friend’s daughter had had her three years earlier and loved her. My daughter is thriving! Partly (mostly?) because my wife and I give a darn, and have been working w/ her since birth, but – clearly – also because she has a teacher that cares, and is willing to do what it takes to ensure her kids succeed. Just plain awesome.
Conversely, we have two friends who’s daughter is in the class w/ the poor teacher. I’ve asked them several times about her, and they are so upset. As one father told me, “she’s clearly just there for the paycheck.”
My point here is, both are treated the same in the eyes of New York State United Teachers. Why is that? In the real world, that poor teacher would be put on an improvement plan, then fired if she didn’t shape up. And the great teacher would be rewarded. But not in a unionized workforce, and that is a shame! But who really suffers? Us, the people paying the salaries! Luckily, my kid got the great teacher this year. We may not be so lucky in later years, and God forbid my younger daughter gets the poor kindergarten teacher in a couple years …
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
“I wasn’t Reagan’s liberal friend and I’m not yours either”
Believe me, I take that as a compliment!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
“In the public sector, outstanding employees are not celebrated, and bad ones are defended tooth and nail. What kind of backwards system is that??
The mythical system as described in Righty World.”
-Sorry Skip, that’s the way it works at my company. The best move up, the average stay put, and the poor move on or get booted. Try it sometime!
“WHY – on earth would an outstanding teacher not want to be recognized for it, rather than seeing the poor teacher down the hall make the same salary”
And the right-wing solution: cut all their salaries to match the production of the poorest teachers….that’ll give all the outstanding teachers plenty of incentive to stick around.”
-No Skip, that’s not what we’re saying but go ahead and stick words in our mouth. I have no problem paying a great teacher a better salary …. as long as, in return, it is easier to fire a poor teacher. What exactly about that do you find troubling?
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
This is the exact thing happening in Ohio this week. The same bill trying to be passed by another Republican governor. Here in Ohio, we have spent BILLIONS, giving it to the Somalians in welfare and free health care. Now the big surprise, the state is short on money!! So to fix it, they will attack the American worker, the ones who actually get up and go to work to pay the taxes for the state to give out to the immigrants in welfare. And an even bigger surprise? A lot of you out there think it’s perfectly ok!! Wait till they come after YOUR pay and Your benefits.
Posted by: Shiloh | February 17, 2011, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
And Skip, if you don’t think it’s hard to fire a bad teacher in New York State, look up the history of New York State United Teachers to see just how wrong you are!
You have to darn near assault a student to even get a sniff of being fired.
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 17, 2011, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
The unions (public sector) got BO elected. No surprise that BO says that the Gov is assulting the unions. Obama WAS and IS a POLITICAL HACK. THIS COUNTRY NEEDS “STATESMEN” – NOT HACKS!!!!
Posted by: temagami | February 17, 2011, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
“when public union bargain with tax payers money, it’s not the same thing as that in private sector. ”
No, it isn’t precisely the same but taxpayers elect officials who negotiate on their behalf, just as shareholders have people in the private sector negotiating on their behalf. Of course, in the public sector, some of the taxpayers who are being represented at the negotiating table include those in the unions. They have every right to assemble, protest, boycott, have their voices heard and fight for fair pay and benefits. They are Americans, they work hard and in this instance, Walker ginned up a budget shortfall after having paid off his cronies.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
that’s the way it works at my company. The best move up, the average stay put, and the poor move on or get booted. Try it sometime!
———————
You spare me you snide judgments. I’m one of the best in the country at what I do.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | Feb 17, 2011 10:39:26 PM
I see it simply as a fact. Therein lies the big difference in our comments and logic.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
as long as, in return, it is easier to fire a poor teacher. What exactly about that do you find troubling?
——————–
Who is going to be the judge of what a poor teacher is. Teachers provide a valuable service which is hard to measure and allocate efficiently in free markets. I know plenty of hard working teachers who have had to weather petty criticism from shallow judgmental parents. The only real measure of ‘output’ is how much their students learn, it’s not a popularity contest.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
A few have wrecked it for the state.
Some teachers in Milwaukee school district make $98,871 salary and $29,436 fringe pay. Add it together and we get $128,307.
Yet, Milwaukee kicks out some of the dumbest kids in the nation.
Didn’t that Milwaukee union think that a day of reckoning would come after negotiating a wage like that with the low cost of living Milwaukee has? It’s just too bad the rest of the teacher’s in the state are targeted.
Posted by: Kris | February 17, 2011, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
You have to darn near assault a student to even get a sniff of being fired
——————–
Evidence of that can be easier to produce than you might think. You know what kids do now? They try to anger and enrage their teachers or otherwise get them into compromising situations and get pictures and movies of them on their cellphones to put online. It’s just great.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
“My point here is, both are treated the same in the eyes of New York State United Teachers. ”
If that’s even true, it sounds like you think every school district has the same lousy set up. We have charter schools with merit pay. Be more proactive in your own school district rather than assuming you know the status of every school district in the country and using one lousy teacher (who isn’t even your daughter’s teacher) as an excuse for demonizing all teachers and other hard working Americans in public unions simply as a means of giving testimony to your ideology.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
It’s the PRIVATE SECTOR that has been under assault by unions! Liberals are so clueless they don’t even understand that the “hard-working middle class” they supposedly champion in the private sector–those who have been pummeled during Obama’s Depression with job losses, pay cuts, foreclosures, loss of retirement benefits, and skyrocketing healthcare costs–are SUBSIDIZING their public sector brethren in public sector unions who enjoy better pay and benefits.
The private sector is broke. The states are broke and must balance their budgets by law. States are drowning in debt due to unfunded public sector pension and Medicaid obligations. Enough is enough. The gravy train stops now, regardless of how many tantrums the left has. It’s finally time for public sector employees to pay the piper for robbing so much wealth from private sector taxpayers. This is long overdue.
Posted by: Mary | February 17, 2011, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
I can not believe the Wisconsin Democrats abdicated their responsibility as an elected official and ran out of town with their tail between their legs rather than place their vote. Now aren’t these the type of leaders you want “leading” Wisconsin?? I think they need to sit in the time out chair and think about what they have done. LOL
Posted by: whathappened08 | February 17, 2011, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
“The private sector is broke.”
No…it isn’t.
And the situation in Wisconsin is about taking away worker rights. Worker rights are human rights.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
“I can not believe the Wisconsin Democrats abdicated their responsibility as an elected official and ran out of town with their tail between their legs rather than place their vote.”
I can believe it. They’re gutless cowards who only know how to deficit spend to buy votes. They’re only interested in power, not in making difficult choices to fix Wisconsin’s budget issues. They need to be thrown out of office for not doing the work that Wisconsin taxpayers are paying them to do.
Posted by: Mary | February 17, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
those who have been pummeled during Obama’s Depression
———————–
No thank you, we’re giving credit for this economic downturn to George Bush.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
“Worker rights are human rights.”
Really? When did public sector rights become human rights, and who said so?
Is there a human right to have taxpayers fund 100% of your retirement fund? Is there a human right to have taxpayers fund 100% of your health care benefits?
Do taxpayers have human rights? Do their elected representatives have the right to establish the conditions under which their money will be disbursed?
If any of these greedy workers feel a single one of their human rights has been violated, he can take his case to court. I do not like his chances.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 11:09:49 PM
Wrong, Alyson. On both counts. The public sector does not have the right to rob the private sector. Those days are coming to a close. Sorry to ruin your day.
Posted by: Mary | February 17, 2011, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
This is the new reality: the American income taxpayer will not be taxed any further. Man up and deal with it.
The sight of thses pigs wailing at the public trough is grotesque. It will be a pleasure to watch them being taught their badly needed lesson.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 17, 2011, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Wisconsin is broke, taxes are too high. I’m tired of contributing to someone elses 401K when I can’t contribute to my own.
Posted by: joey | February 17, 2011, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Who is going to be the judge of what a poor teacher is. Teachers provide a valuable service which is hard to measure and allocate efficiently in free markets. I know plenty of hard working teachers who have had to weather petty criticism from shallow judgmental parents. The only real measure of ‘output’ is how much their students learn, it’s not a popularity contest.
Posted by: Skip |
Ask em why there aren’t better ways to measure teacher performance? I bet none of them say the union.
Los Angeles spends 3.5 million over a decade trying to fire 7 teachers and lost two of those cases.
And why do politicians always seem to opt out of the system they created?
Or gaming that system like they did under Arne Duncan in the tribal regions of Illinois. Whatever became of that genius after he threw the DC schoolchildren under the bus?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 17, 2011, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Posted by: Skip | Feb 17, 2011 11:15:36 PM
But Nancy Pelosi fixed the economy with a record $5.4 trillion in deficit spending in four years. Oh wait, no she didn’t. We’re now experiencing INCREASING poverty, increasing unemployment, increasing foreclosures, and increasing bankruptcies. Democrats turned a recession into a depression. A record number of the middle class have joined the ranks of the poor in just this past year, but thankfully Obama’s friends in the top 1% have done quite well. That wasn’t the promised “Hope and Change” as I remember it.
Posted by: Mary | February 17, 2011, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Mary, you didn’t ruin my day. I’m not a Republican (or self-proclaimed “independent conservative” who only votes Republican), and hence, not thin-skinned nor given to believing lies and untruths. I certainly don’t take the word of a someone who is unclear on how the private sector is doing but makes definitive statements anyway and then says, but, but, but you’re wrong cuz I just know it in my little heart and feel it in my gut.
The private sector isn’t “broke” nor is the United States. Some states are but Wisconsin wasn’t doing as badly as it is now prior to Walker taking over either. He ginned up the budget shortfall.
The heart of the story in Wisconsin is loony idealogues voted in as Republicans want to strip away 50 years of worker rights in under a week. The proposal removes the ability of public workers to negotiate in any meaningful way bargaining rights going forward in perpetuity.
And many taxpayers and voters and workers in Wisconsin aren’t happy about it.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
I would love to see some public support for unions from the American public. Now is the time to show that there is a new progressive movement that is not satisfied with the center right to far right policies that have been coming out of Washington since the 80′s.
Posted by: Pinko Roosevelt | February 17, 2011, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
“The private sector isn’t “broke” nor is the United States.”
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 11:26:56 PM
Google “debt clock real time” and support your argument.
Posted by: Mary | February 17, 2011, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Feb 17, 2011 11:17:58 PM
You don’t see teachers as human? Worker rights are human rights, and your demonizing them because they choose to work in the public sector when you yourself were paid by the government, then hiding behind the likelihood of winning a court case because you can’t handle the philosophical proof you’d need to make to truly make a good point is cowardly. That’s right, cowardly. Why? Because you know what it’s about. You’re not as stupid as the rest of them. Don’t start now.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
I sit here and read some of these posts and I just can’t help but hope some go on to lose their own retirement or jobs.
Posted by: secondlook | February 17, 2011, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
I sit here and read some of these posts and I just can’t help but hope some go on to lose their own retirement or jobs.
Posted by: secondlook | Feb 17, 2011 11:35:23 PM
Oh please. You know it would somehow turn out to be the fault of leftie commie union thugs, elitists and President Obama. Never mind that if the Republicans did half the crap they say they’d do the economy would be totally in the tank and they’d all perish in the pure free market they idolize. Galt, they aren’t.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Democrats turned a recession into a depression
—————
I’d love to see how Politifact would rate this claim. I’m betting either flat out false or even “pants on fire”. For one thing the economic indicators typically used to make these judgments don’t even place us in recession now…have you noticed the DOW for instance? Next if anyone is prolonging unemployment it’s been the Republicans by inhibiting government spending any way they possibly can so employment is going to have to crawl back under free market forces alone, which history has demonstrated repeatedly can be a protracted affair.
Posted by: Skip | February 17, 2011, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 11:38:00 PM
I thought I had seen it all when they talked a bunch of low paid people into thinking it was patriotic to give multi-millionaires wads more. Then they began this. These people honestly can’t grasp they themselves will eventually suffer if this is allowed to play out.
Posted by: secondlook | February 17, 2011, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Posted by: Mary | Feb 17, 2011 11:32:17 PM
Google our assets, calculate our potential for revenue, look up our GDP and where we stand in terms of national economies and standard of living and defend yours.
Posted by: Alyson | February 17, 2011, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
These people honestly can’t grasp they themselves will eventually suffer if this is allowed to play out.
Posted by: secondlook | Feb 17, 2011 11:44:06 PM
Right. I read a good article at Fiscal Times in which Bruce Bartlett points out that up until now, Republicans have been able to pander to the Tea Party crowd with big promises of big cuts to spending and government without anyone in that crowd believing that it will affect them in any way. They think all the cuts will affect other people. Sarah Palin likes to talk about spending other people’s money. Well, republicans like to talk about cutting other people’s benefits as if none of them are taxpayers or even human, apparently.
Bartlett cites research by Cornell political scientist Suzanne Mettler which shows that a lot of recipients of government benefits don’t believe that they have received any benefits. Once their gone though, they’ll sing another tune. We saw what happened regarding Medicare during the health care debates and town halls. I read a good quote that went something like, “The average Tea Partier is sincerely against government spending with the exception of the money spent on them. They have no problem collecting government largesse for themselves.” (Get the government of health care, but don’t touch my Medicare!)
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 12:01 am 12:01 am
This has been going on all week, and suddenly ABC discovers this story? And still seems to be struggling to get all the facts.
Apparently, there really ISN’T a big budget issue – this is nothing more than a GOP union-busting scheme. Of course, the budget would have been helped if Walker and the Republican legislature hadn’t just doled out big tax breaks for – you guessed it – the corporations. Obviously, the GOP has no problem negotiating for zero taxes for corporations, but has an enormous problem negotiating contracts for the services of working Americans.
And why do conservatives hate unions so much? Shouldn’t working Americans be permitted to negotiate the worth of their goods and services just like the big corporate “citizens?”
Now I understand that conservatives welcomed working for private employers who can dictate and change the terms of their compensation and employment AT-WILL – but now they are whining because there are still some workers who managed to keep some benefits.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Not one post in defense of the wonderful job being done by our public education system. Is there a more progressive institution of this magnitude in our country?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Obama, the second coming sez: “My point here is, both are treated the same in the eyes of New York State United Teachers. Why is that? In the real world, that poor teacher would be put on an improvement plan, then fired if she didn’t shape up. And the great teacher would be rewarded.”
————————-
Apparently you are pretty disconnected from the real world. Almost anyone who has worked in the private sector knows that often the most incompetent buttkissers are the ones promoted and rewarded. After all, it was the conservatives who, during the 1990′s, invented the concept of “networking” as a means to often avoid equal opportunity provisions.
In the private sector, it isn’t unusual at all for an incompetent person to be rewarded and promoted. People get opportunities because they play a round of golf with the boss or because they attend the same church.
And conservatives gladly pay more at the grocery store, happily pay higher insurance premiums, gleefully accept dictated utility rates without a single protest. Yet go on and on about the government “picking their pocket” as if the corporations wouldn’t be sticking their hands in it with every convenience fee invented to boost “profits?
The core issue here is this: Are American individual working citizens allowed the right to negotiate their working contracts or not? Obviously, conservatives believe in corporate dictation – which is why you’ll never see the Tea Party standing in front of Blue Cross after a 20%+ “premium” increase protesting THAT pickpocketing.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:26 am 12:26 am
SCOTY sez: “Unions represent UNIONS. We are nothing but pawns in their game. They care about individuals as much as dems did when they forced healthscam thtough.”
—————————
And we all know that Republicans care nothing about any working American – nor do they believe that working Americans have a right to seek a profit or negotiate their contracts for services. That, apparently, is a “right” reserved exclusively for corporations, especially the ones who are lured into an area with tax exemptions.
These are, quite naturally, the same companies that you’ll never see a conservative protest when they raise their prices – only the meek “they are entitled to make a profit” response.
Apparently the American worker is NOT entitled to make a profit, nor be compensated for the value of his serviced.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Ask em why there aren’t better ways to measure teacher performance?
————————
How do you propose to do it?
Test scores?
Curriculum workload?
Ratings by their peers?
Ratings by their community?
There are obvious flaws in all of these.
Posted by: Skip | February 18, 2011, 12:29 am 12:29 am
ALYSON sez: “It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January.”
—————————–
And you can bet those special-interest groups include big business. Let’s see the governor levy a tax on tax-exempt corporations for a change. After all, since the conservatives conned the U.S. Supreme Court into making them citizens, one would think these companies shouldn’t be on public welfare.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Walker can face a recall election in 11 months. And I have a feeling that is exactly what is going to happen to this Tea Party clown.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Skip sez: “But Nancy Pelosi fixed the economy with a record $5.4 trillion in deficit spending in four years. Oh wait, no she didn’t. We’re now experiencing INCREASING poverty, increasing unemployment, increasing foreclosures, and increasing bankruptcies”
———————-
Much of that stimulus was earmarked – per Republican demands – for TAX BREAKS, which the GOP insisted would “create jobs.” Wanna tell us how many JOBS that created?
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:34 am 12:34 am
BO, PWD sez: “President Obama needs to call off his union thugs from visiting the homes of Republican politicians in Wisconsin and DC. This attempt at intimidation needs to stop.”
————————-
Sounds to me like they were borrowing a page from the Tea Party playbook. Except they didn’t throw bricks thru windows, cut gas lines, or carry their firearms around as an act of intimidation.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:37 am 12:37 am
ALYSON:
You can always tell a Tea Partier’s sign by the misspelled words.
I’ve always wondered how they could claim to be so patriotic when they were obviously too lazy to learn use of their own language when they went to school.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Obama, the second coming sez: “Stop complaining union workers – you have it better than most, even when you’re asked to give something back.”
——————
Now why is it that they seem to have it better than most? Could it be that conservatives, led by their patron saint Ronald Reagan, managed to sell off their own bargaining power, watch their wages and benefits erode, and surrender themselves to corporate master dictators without putting up as much as a whimper?
And now, rather than (per usual) asking the corporations and the wealthy to contribute to the state, they jealously demand to force other workers to give up their rights so that everyone will be on the waterslide to Third World economic status. Well, everyone except the wealthy, of course. They will continue to be the sole benefactors of government handouts with the blessings of their servants, the Republican Party.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Parallax View sez: “Here’s a thought…How about, TAX PAYERS RIGHTS…..”
————————–
Well, that would eliminate quite a few companies who don’t pay any taxes, thanks to conservative policies.
So how about CONSUMERS rights? You know, the right to question a 20 percent “premium” hike from a health insurance company, or the right to question the price fixing of a food manufacturer who makes a smaller package and raises the price? Oh – that’s right – conservatives don’t believe in protesting corporations. . .our pockets are theirs for the picking.
And just what would you do with more money in your pocket from tax cuts? You’ll turn it all over to the companies, who will invent new convenience fees, slap on higher utility bills, and raise your insurance premiums. And you won’t say a word about having them pick your pocket without getting much of anything in return.
Nope.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Skip sez: “But Nancy Pelosi fixed the economy with a record $5.4 trillion in deficit spending in four years
—————–
That wasn’t me…I just didn’t want Mary to fail to get the well deserved credit for her diatribe, but do continue Kevin, I’m enjoying your comments.
Posted by: Skip | February 18, 2011, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Jose sez: “Until then, don’t whine to me about how you want my taxes to pay for your free health care and pensions.
”
—————————–
Well gosh, Jose. . .many private companies once paid for health care and pensions – what happened? And what did conservatives do to stand up to them while they gradually, continually, took those benefits away?
So you don’t want your tax dollars paying for benefits for others that private companies have taken away from you. Bet you sure didn’t open your mouth when the private companies were charging the rest of us more for goods and services in order to pay for those benefits for YOU.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Obama, the Second Coming sez: “Well, luckily for us Alyson, most of us are going against your way … you know, socialism!”
—————-
Really? Let’s see here – it looks pretty socialistic to me to demand that other workers give up their contract-negotiated rights because YOU did in the private sector years ago – and now are paying the price. I mean, why should they have these rights when you so willingly gave them up at the behest of your own employers over the years?
So of course you resent paying for these benefits – and you resent that others still can collectively bargain to secure a contract to sell their services to the people of the state. After all, bargaining to secure a working contract is a socialist thing, right?
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Obama, the Second Coming sez: “Let the free market determine salaries and benefits”
————————-
How is that free market thing working out for middle class America? Oh – that’s right – the “free” market dictates that it is a perpetual buyer’s market for companies, so employees have no bargaining power and are completely beholden to the dictates of the corporation. And as their salary and benefits are eroded with each passing year, it’s just a by-product of the “free” market – the one in which only one party negotiates the contract the other party is told to be “grateful.”
We’ve turned our entire private sector employment market into a credit card scheme – just so conservatives can force most of the American people back into poverty.
And isn’t there some GOP lawmaker in Missouri trying hard to do away with child labor laws?
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Obama the Second coming sez: “What you and your unionite friends don’t want to face is that you have to sacrifice just like the rest of us now, and you don’t want to”
————————-
You mean, except Republican special interest groups and the wealthy – they are exempt from sacrifice.
And they didn’t even need a Union to negotiate their own special favors.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Cheesehead sez: “One thing unionized public employees love to forget is that the money they demand is from their “neighbors and friends”, that in effect when they unionized it is not against the government they protest, but against everyone that pays for it and against their own country men.”
———————–
One thing Cheesehead forgets is that private employees, when they receive benefits and wage packages and bonuses, earn that money through higher prices levied against the buyers of the goods and services of their company. This means their friends, neighbors, and relatives all pay higher prices so Cheesehead’s private employer can give him his higher wage and benefits package.
So when Cheesehead applies for a job with a private company, he’s waging war against his neighbors and friends and relatives, knowing that the more money he earns, the more it has to come out of the pockets of others. Certainly there should be laws preventing all private employees from negotiating anything in their contracts beyond wages – and those wages should be directly tied to the consumer price index so he cannot EVER earn more than that dictates. After all, he shouldn’t wish to pick the pockets of the consumers who must purchase the goods and services his employer produces in order to pay his salary/benefits.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Patrick sez: “Obama sides with greedy unions who are bankrupting the states. No surprise there.
—————————-
And no surprise that a conservative would forget that perhaps all the corporations who were allowed TAX-EXEMPT status and given tax breaks might be bankrupting the states.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:13 am 1:13 am
I think there must be some way that Obama can sue the State of Wisconsin.
Maybe this would lead to racial profiling of Teachers.
Get right on that Holder!
Posted by: Noz | February 18, 2011, 1:15 am 1:15 am
MAYBEE sez: “Obama does not see public employee unions as “faceless bureaucrats”. He sees them as big huge political donors.”
——————–
You mean, like the Republicans view tax-breaks and tax-exempt corporations as huge political donors?
Now what is Governor Walker doing to encourage them to increase their share of the burden of saving the state?
Nothing? Oh. . .well, what a surprise.
Corporations – the GOP’s welfare queens.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:15 am 1:15 am
KevinBgoode…said…”"Well gosh, Jose. . .many private companies once paid for health care and pensions – what happened? And what did conservatives do to stand up to them while they gradually, continually, took those benefits away? “”
And you think the labor unions had nothing to do with sending so many jobs overseas for cheap labor?? Yes that’s what the unions do, they hold companies hostage to ridiculous demands that can’t be competetive in a global economy. So by all means, bankrupt all the states and schools, then you will blame who?????
Posted by: Edward80 | February 18, 2011, 1:15 am 1:15 am
kevinbgoode sez: My guys are bad but your guys are worser.
Nanny nanny boo boo.
Posted by: Noz | February 18, 2011, 1:19 am 1:19 am
FINALLY! It’s about damn time Obama stepped up for the American’s that got him elected.
Posted by: dan | February 18, 2011, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Ed sez: “The State workers already enjoy so many before benefits and protections than the normal person in the private sector”
—————————–
Now how did that happen, Ed? Could it be that conservatives, led by their patron saint Ronnie Reagan, actively sought to dissolve the bargaining power of employees in private companies? And, 30 years later, what we have is lots of private employees who no longer get fully paid health and pension benefits?
Maybe someone should have stood up 30 years ago and said something instead of waiting until they lose it all and then demand that everyone else lose theirs, too.
Now why is it that conservatives aren’t willing to extend Walker’s plan into the private sector? Why shouldn’t consumers be allowed to vote on whether to accept higher prices on goods and services produced by a private employer when that employer is providing wage increases that surpass the consumer price index? I mean, that’s money out of MY pocket, isn’t it? Especially if it is a utility and I have no alternatives?
If I have to pay the higher prices at the market, I should be able to veto the wage increases for employeesin the private sector. After all, they are picking the pockets of their friends and neighbors for personal profit.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Yes that’s what the unions do, they hold companies hostage to ridiculous demands that can’t be competetive in a global economy
—————
Let’s be clear again that it’s obviously not the Democrats who want to lower the American worker’s standard of living.
Posted by: Skip | February 18, 2011, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Parallax View sez: “Auh….12.6 percent contribution to health care…5.6 percent contribution to pension plan….Breakin my heart…”
———————
Yeah. . it would break your heart if you hadn’t bargained that stuff away in your own employment years ago. But I’m real sure it would break your heart if your boss told you that ya can’t get another raise above 1% unless the public passes a referendum approving the price increases in the products to pay for it. . .
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Obama, the Second Coming sez: “Oh and the best part, for having to deal with this legislation, teachers for one are guaranteed that there will be no layoffs”
—————————
Try reading the whole bill.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Now what is Governor Walker doing to encourage them to increase their share of the burden of saving the state?
Nothing? Oh. . .well, what a surprise.
—————-
Don’t you know Kevin? Encouraging corporations to increase their share of the burden would be a job killer…at least that’s the formulaic line.
Posted by: Skip | February 18, 2011, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Parallax View sez: “There is NO MONEY LEFT…Those few with jobs can no longer shoulder the burden, tax, alone…”
————————-
Did ya tell that to your insurance company the last time they raised their “premiums” on you for no stated reason?
Yeah – I thought not.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Wisconsinite – Apparently, conservatives believe that the middle class should pay for those perks for special interests because government is supposed to provide welfare for the rich.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | February 18, 2011, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Ask em why there aren’t better ways to measure teacher performance?
————————
How do you propose to do it?
There are obvious flaws in all of these.
Posted by: Skip |
The fact that we don’t even know how to measure it is a tell. Why is it in all of academia no one can figure out a way to measure teacher performance? These are our best and brightest liberal minds.
There are obvious flaws in the status quo. Maybe you will mention one sometime.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Ed sez: “The State workers already enjoy so many before benefits and protections than the normal person in the private sector”
MAYBEE sez: “Obama does not see public employee unions as “faceless bureaucrats”. He sees them as big huge political donors.”
Patrick sez: “Obama sides with greedy unions who are bankrupting the states. No surprise there.
Cheesehead sez: “One thing unionized public employees love to forget is that the money they demand is from their “neighbors and friends”, that in effect when they unionized it is not against the government they protest, but against everyone that pays for it and against their own country men.”
Obama the Second coming sez: “What you and your unionite friends don’t want to face is that you have to sacrifice just like the rest of us now, and you don’t want to”
YEP I SAID THAT sez: “Typical of the lowlife radical democrats..keep spending the states money and not showing up for work because they are cowards”
Obama, the Second Coming sez: “Let the free market determine salaries and benefits”
Obama, the Second Coming sez: “Well, luckily for us Alyson, most of us are going against your way … you know, socialism!”
Jose sez: “Until then, don’t whine to me about how you want my taxes to pay for your free health care and pensions.”
Parallax View sez: “Here’s a thought…How about, TAX PAYERS RIGHTS…..”
Obama, the second coming sez: “Stop complaining union workers – you have it better than most, even when you’re asked to give something back.”
BO, PWD sez: “President Obama needs to call off his union thugs from visiting the homes of Republican politicians in Wisconsin and DC. This attempt at intimidation needs to stop.”
Skip sez: “But Nancy Pelosi fixed the economy with a record $5.4 trillion in deficit spending in four years. Oh wait, no she didn’t. We’re now experiencing INCREASING poverty, increasing unemployment, increasing foreclosures, and increasing bankruptcies”
Isn’t it nice to see just how many Americans get it!
Thank You KevinBGoode for pointing that out.
Posted by: Noz | February 18, 2011, 1:29 am 1:29 am
And we have have all borne witness to the good the unions did for detroit now didn’t we?? Oh but but but……yeah we know, you union guys love to blame everybody but yourselves. Take, take, take and then take some more. THAT is why the rest of the country has no use for unions. Find someone else to blame, I think your time is over. Get used to it. Bye Bye!
Posted by: Edward80 | February 18, 2011, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Why is it in all of academia no one can figure out a way to measure teacher performance?
———————
If it was easy free markets could efficiently allocate these services, but like policemen and firefighters their services are difficult to quantify, though few would dispute their importance and value.
Posted by: Skip | February 18, 2011, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Why is it in all of academia no one can figure out a way to measure teacher performance?
———————
if it was easy free markets could efficiently allocate these services, but like policemen and firefighters their services are difficult to quantify, though few would dispute their importance and value.
Posted by: Skip |
I wonder what criteria Barry used when he chose a school for his children. Maybe we could use that.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 2:19 am 2:19 am
you union people are right, by god. let the state keep paying the incompentent their free pensions and above average pay at the tax payers expense. amen. then the state can get along with those layoffs. who do they think they are? asking the incompentent to contribute to their own pensions and medical care like the rest of the public!
Posted by: rdw | February 18, 2011, 4:40 am 4:40 am
Can someone tell me who will pay to keep the roads safe, teach my children, or put out those house fires if we don’t pay them. AMericans want everything, but they dont’ want to pay for anything. The harsh truth is our taxes are less now than they were when President Bush left office. Unfortunately, too many people believe the GOP/Tea Party BS. Remember, Reagan first cut taxes, then realized he couldn’t run the government and raised them higher than they were when he entered office. But the GOP/Tea Party only remembers the first part of his administration. Americans will learn that they’ve been bamboozled when all the major bridges and highways are privatized, and they end up paying more to travel to work than they did before the big push to break the government.
Posted by: AL | February 18, 2011, 6:58 am 6:58 am
Backing Unions is not backing the workers, as the title of this article read on the main page. There are plenty of workers out there who do a great job and help build this country, but are not any part of a union. Not only that, we don’t want to work for unions. Forcing dues on people who are already taxed enough, and then taking those dues and using them to pay off rich politicians, is not backing workers. Unions were an idea that ran their course, and now exist only to further their own existence.
Posted by: Dean | February 18, 2011, 6:59 am 6:59 am
As a union member, there are things that need to be handled better, BUT, as the gap widens between the diminishing 2% at the top, (I say diminishing because as they step on the middle class, they are biting off the hand that feeds them.) and the rest of the world, the unions which those on top hate are the people who narrow that gap asking for a days pay, for a days work, along with stupid things like decent health care, and job security, in a country where jobs are disappearing. I work for a CEO at one of the 10 most profitable companies in the country, who says WE meaning the lowly union members need to sacrifice, while he makes in one day what I make in a year, at a top union job. WE need to sacrifice so that THEY can widen the gap. You have low income people who listen to these people denouncing the unions, and sometimes taking sides with the Republicans on other issues like abortion, which the Republicans use as a way to attract puppets to there cause. It is a political tactic known as “Seeking a nobler purpose” which means they don’t come out and say “Help us save the wealthy”. They say help us fight abortion, while fighting to take away the entitlements that will feed the extra kids, or protect them from the alcoholic parent, who really didn’t want another kid. The Republicans get their backbone from some of the same people they step on daily.
Posted by: parma hts gary | February 18, 2011, 7:04 am 7:04 am
It seems that many commenting here have not read the news articles on what is going on in Wisconsin.
The teachers, firemen, etc. are not protesting the wage freeze, paying more towards their pension and insurance. They are willing to help balance the budget. What they are protesting is ending collective bargaining.
There are many comments here that federal employees are overpaid, but the facts, as stated in another abc news article, show that isn’t true. The right is very into making up their own ‘facts’ to justify their position. We need the media to be alert and not let them repeat lies without challenging them with the truth. Good job, abc.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 7:04 am 7:04 am
Edwardo 80, companies sent jobs overseas to increase their profits aided in part by a Republican bill that actually gave them a tax break to do it.(which just last year Republcans blocked from repealing.)
As for Americans getting paid more than 3rd world laborers, duh, there is a bit of a contrast in living expenses isn’t there?
The real difference is tariffs, remember those? Years ago, we had protective tariffs on some products so that companies couldn’t ship jobs overseas and profit or import and destroy American companies using American workers. With tariffs gone, thanks to corporate influencing making a global economy sound like a terrific idea, some corporations took advantage of the very low wages overseas. Their competitors were forced to follow or be priced out of the market. Thus our economy has steadily weakened, jobs left and as trade deficits with China and others grew.
The problem is corporations making the rules for their benefit, while harming our economy by harming the American worker and decreasing jobs here.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 7:30 am 7:30 am
Does anyone understand the reason so many states are suddenly broke is not because of wages paid out but because the state’s income is much lower, due to high unemployment?
People out of work are not paying in as much tax to the state as income tax or buying as much and thus contributing sales tax. Plus the states are paying out millions in unemployment.
The solution doesn’t lie in cutting jobs but by increasing jobs.
We can all help by buying American-made products whenever posssible. Check your labels, even at the supermarket. There are now Chinese frozen veggies and cookies, besides many other items. (How crazy is it that veggies we grow here in abundance, are now being shipped from China?)
Buying American = Jobs = Higher Revenue = Balanced Budgets
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 7:38 am 7:38 am
Wisconsin Law…946.12 Misconduct in public office. Any public officer or public employee who does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony: 946.12(1) (1) Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, non discretionary, ministerial duty of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law..Throw The Dems in Jail for committing a Felony…
Posted by: Reality2014 | February 18, 2011, 7:44 am 7:44 am
Dean, workers that don’t belong to a union have benefits because of unions. Read your history. Working 5 days a week, being paid overtime, sick days, vacation days, workers compensation, safety at work, all are facts because of unions. To think companies would still provide those workers rights if unions no longer exist is to deny history.
For example, every time the Republicans have a majority they try to weaken the Clean Air Act. Did we stop needing clean air to breathe? No, but that won’t stop the greediest from taking away what we all need for a decent life, if it can make them more money. It would be the same way with worker’s rights if unions didn’t exist. Greed will stop at nothing. All American workers should support those protesting in Wisconsin.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 7:57 am 7:57 am
Yes it is Barry, and a long overdue “assault” on unions too !!! the union/government gravy train needs to be derailed. You wanted the job of “leader of the free world” when are you going to step up and Lead? so far the only leadership you’ve shown us is how to be the “finger pointer -in-chief”
Hmmmm ? “assault” I guess civiiity only applies to what other s say?
Posted by: formerdem | February 18, 2011, 8:11 am 8:11 am
I lost a good job 2 years ago. I make $8000 less now but I have a job, I didnt go on unemployment. I cant afford health insurance for my family now. I am concidered low income. So I am supposed to feel sorry for these poor middle class State Employees? These are desperate times we are in and some just dont get it! They want the rich to pay for their generous pension plan Everyone has to pay their share.
Posted by: hdrake | February 18, 2011, 8:14 am 8:14 am
PLEASE SHUT UP AND STOP COMPLAINING, YOU ALL WANTED THE TEA PARTY TO GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK, AND NOW THEY ARE DOING JUST THAT. THEY WILL DESTROY EVERYTHING TO STOP THAT BLACK PRESIDENT FROM BEING SUCCESSFUL.
Posted by: vern | February 18, 2011, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Clearly the Wisconsin governor slipped this little provision in as a nod to his corporate supporters. It really has nothing to do with balancing the state budget.
Fortunatly, the people are calling him on it and doing their best to get him to back down. I think I see a black eye growing on his face.
Posted by: Wayne | February 18, 2011, 8:26 am 8:26 am
These teachers complain how about teaching high school grads and some college grads cannot read the diploma they get.
Posted by: Daniel | February 18, 2011, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Barry, Barry, Barry, your union colors are comming out. Why is this no suprise and he says he wants to help businesses. Too funny barry.
Posted by: billy bob | February 18, 2011, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Too bad Obama does not know what his job is; it certainly is not to ‘take sides’ in local disputes. Yet, he has a history of doing so. Instead of campaigning 24 hours a day; Obama should try this concept – WORK.
Posted by: Banderman | February 18, 2011, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Whats funny is that the unions say they will accept the modest reductions in their pensions and health care but not the bargining agreement. That is like putting a bandaid on a cut off arm. All the unions would do is wait until their contract expires and then use their strong arm tatics to get it all back and then some. Smart move governor.
Posted by: billy bob | February 18, 2011, 8:40 am 8:40 am
This is wonderful.Democrat stupidity is pushing Wisconsin into Red State territory.The next session the Republicans will have no problem getting a quorum-aside from the People’s Republic of Madison and the dependent parasite areas of Milwaukee the Democrat actions of yesterday have assured the continuing growth of the Republican Party in Wisconsin.Kohl will not win his next election-if he runs.
Posted by: Nephron | February 18, 2011, 8:46 am 8:46 am
The largest cost for most businesses is payroll. Everyone needs to tighten their belt, including the governor. I think we need to have unions to keep big business honest. However, there needs to be a happy medium. Most union employees are extremely over paid and under worked. MHO.
Posted by: jrh512 | February 18, 2011, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I do understand that those Wisconsin workers need to take a bit of a pay hit to help balance their budget, as do most of the workers. But this is something that should be negotiated, as it has in the past and in other states. The real travesty is the governor and Republicans trying to take away collective bargaining. And this is what most of the protestors are against. They know our history and know without collective bargaining, the American worker is powerless and gets ripped off.
Collective bargaining has nothing to do with balancing their budget, this is just a union-busting move.
Wisconsin has a 3.6 billion dollar deficit, all that the workers are losing only amount to 300 million over 2 years, so how is this genius governor going to make up the difference? I’ll bet that it won’t be raising taxes on the wealthy! He’ll just hit the little people again and again.
The people of Wisconsin are right to protest, even go on strike to stop this. Do they have governor recall in Wisconsin, I wonder?
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 9:03 am 9:03 am
hdrake, the issue isn’t the give-backs, the issue is ending collective bargaining. That is what most of the protestors are against.
I’m sorry that the economy left you with a lower paying job. I hope in 2014 when the health care reform bill becomes more active that you will get affordable insurance. Being without insurance cost lives, as 40,000 Americans die each year because they couldn’t afford insurance.
The people of Wisconsin are right to protest and even strike to get the governor to hear them and not abolish the workers right to collective bargaining.
Do you honestly think the governor and those Republican legislators would have been elected if they had advertised ending collective bargaining?
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 9:12 am 9:12 am
.. the issue isn’t the give-backs, the issue is ending collective bargaining….The people of Wisconsin are right to protest and even strike to get the governor to hear them and not abolish the workers right to collective bargaining.
Posted by: Lydia | Feb 18, 2011 9:12:20 AM
That’s exactly right. Here’s a different approach that isn’t about stripping workers’ rights:
“Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, the former chief operating officer of computer manufacturer Gateway Inc., won election last November on a similar pro-business agenda and also wants savings from public employee costs. But he’s not seeking to abolish collective bargaining rights and has publicly denounced legislative efforts to strike at union membership and fees.
Snyder wants all government employees to pay 20 percent of their health care premiums. But he’s not ramming the change at unions, and went out of his way Thursday to highlight his desire to work with them.
“As a practical matter, we’re asking for $180 million in concessions, and we know we need to go bargain for that,” Snyder told reporters Thursday after delivering his 2011-12 budget proposal. “We want to do that thoughtfully in partnership with our employees. We’re not here to create threats.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 9:41 am 9:41 am
“Google our assets, calculate our potential for revenue, look up our GDP and where we stand in terms of national economies and standard of living and defend yours.”
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 17, 2011 11:45:32 PM
You want my assets, Alyson? Come get them!
Posted by: Mary | February 18, 2011, 9:43 am 9:43 am
How I hear Mary:
but, but, but I feel it in my wittle heart. My gut tells me sooooo… wah, wah, wah, wah, wah. Why don’t you understand my delusions?
We can cut to the chase. I don’t share your delusions, but I do see them for what they are.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 9:51 am 9:51 am
“I think what Gov. Walker is trying to do amounts to political thuggery,” Mr. Obey told Talking Points Memo. “It is one thing to say that these are tough times — everybody’s got to cut back and public employees are going to have to take cuts like the rest of us … but he’s using it as an excuse to gut the ability of workers to organize and bargain collectively. In my view that’s outrageous.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 9:59 am 9:59 am
This is ridiculous. The uproar is not about merely contributions to health care and retirement benefits. It is about doing away with 50 years of history in a week by crushing the right of collective bargaining. We must reform the pensions, but this policy of Governor Walker is just over the top idiocy. Is it true he didn’t even attend college? Jesus. God help you, Wisconsinites!
To the Teahadists: Are you a Packers fan? Socialist!
Posted by: Metilda | February 18, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am
P.S. You want to cut a couple hundred million from the budget, Walker? Follow the lead of the newly minted GOP Gov in Pennsylvania and pull the plug on a jail.
Posted by: Metilda | February 18, 2011, 10:07 am 10:07 am
“It’s important that people understand this: This is a fight Gov. Walker picked for the specific purpose of breaking the unions. Wisconsin had a surplus, and as soon as he was sworn in, Walker gave it away to special interests in order to put the state into deficit.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 10:22 am 10:22 am
What about the children? Wisconsin teachers are putting their union above what is best for the common good.
Posted by: Bo, PWD | February 18, 2011, 10:30 am 10:30 am
“When conservatopia arrives and kids all go to for-profit schools where they’re taught by non-unionized teachers, the school operators’ trade association will have all the same sometimes problematic incentives that the National Education Association has today. Heck, it’ll probably even be called the National Education Association. But instead of being a “union” that promotes high levels of education spending in sometimes inefficient ways plus egalitarian social policies, it’ll be a “business association” that promotes high levels of education spending in sometimes inefficient ways plus regressive social policies.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Federal employee unions such as SEIU are running this country broke.
Federal salaries and benefit packages are far above comparable private sector positions.
The only way to get a handle on the federal budget is to initiate a series of cuts in the number of federal personnell and to reduce their outlandish compensation.
The unions won’t like this, but they are putting their interests above that of the nation.
USA Today has published several expose stories about federal salaries. Is it any wonder that 7 of the top 10 richest counties in the nation are surrounding Washington DC?
Posted by: Joe White | February 18, 2011, 10:38 am 10:38 am
“So, prior to the Reagan Revolution, people in the private sector could tell that teachers, social workers, firefighters, police, and civil servants were getting screwed because they couldn’t collectively negotiate their contracts. But now it looks like they are getting a sweet deal at the taxpayer’s expense. To the degree that that is true, it isn’t because government workers are better off. It’s because everyone else is getting screwed. And why is that? The fact that the power of unions has waned under sustained Republican assault is one of the most important reasons. Obviously, increased global competition is another.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Joe White, it isn’t true that federal employees make more than those with the same job in the private sector, the study cited by usa today and fox news is skewed as it lumps together all workers of all occupations. Federal employees have more white collar than blue collar jobs, unlike the public, so of course, the average salary is higher, just as it is for Microsoft over Wal-mart.
When you compare the wages by similar jobs and locales the salaries are the same. The feds actually set the salaries by averaging what the private sector is paying in that city for a comparable job.
And about complaining about the federal jobs Obama has added, know that 4 out of 5 are in the Defense, Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Seems like we needed to beef up all three of them.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Snyder wants all government employees to pay 20 percent of their health care premiums. But he’s not ramming the change at unions, and went out of his way Thursday to highlight his desire to work with them.
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 18, 2011 9:41:15 AM
Yet the protests have begun in Michigan. Encouraged by the DNC.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | February 18, 2011, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Obama said in his comments about the protests in Wisconsin that Scott Walker’s supposed budget argument that he wanted to close a budget shortage by shutting down union bargaining, was an “apparent” attack on unions in general.
What planet has Obama been on for the past 2 years??? What does he think UNION BUSTING looks like????
Maybe he put on a brand new pair of BLOOD-RED REPUBLICAN boxer shorts that John Boehmer and Mitch McConnell gave him before he made that comment!!!!
Posted by: walt1944 | February 18, 2011, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Posted by: wheresmymoney | Feb 18, 2011 11:04:46 AM
Source? When I google it nothing comes up to verify.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Posted by: wheresmymoney | Feb 18, 2011 11:04:46 AM
No source? That’s because it’s Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio where the governors are taking away rights and the DNC and OFA are helping with turnout for protests.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 11:25 am 11:25 am
“When conservatopia arrives and kids all go to for-profit schools where they’re taught by non-unionized teachers,”
schools like the one Barry sends his kids too…
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Politico: “OFA, now an arm of the DNC, has been providing help to man phone banks and working to find transportation for thousands of protesters in Madison.
Boehner called on Obama “to order the DNC to suspend these tactics” — which the president has no intention of doing.
The White House is walking a fine line here: Wisconsin and Ohio are virtually must-win states for Obama. Both went for him in 2008 and both have big, well-organized union populations. But both states have massive budget deficits and feisty independent voting bases that booted out dozens of Democrats in last year’s midterms.”
Now we see the true reason Obama is sticking his nose in State business.
Alyson, I misspoke. Michigan has only had a “sick out” by about 40% of the teachers so far…. We will see what happens in the coming days.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | February 18, 2011, 11:53 am 11:53 am
“Alyson, I misspoke. ”
Okay, I thought so. My point about Michigan in my post @ 9:41:15 AM was that in that case the Republican governor isn’t taking away rights, and that is the heart of this story. In fact, in Michigan the governor has “has publicly denounced legislative efforts to strike at union membership.”
“Snyder wants all government employees to pay 20 percent of their health care premiums. …
“As a practical matter, we’re asking for $180 million in concessions, and we know we need to go bargain for that,” Snyder told reporters Thursday after delivering his 2011-12 budget proposal. “We want to do that thoughtfully in partnership with our employees. We’re not here to create threats.”
See? He knows he needs to bargain for that.
In contrast, Walker is resorting to political thuggery.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
“Source? When I google it nothing comes up to verify.”
Maybe that’s because two Google execs were behind the Egypt riots, and Google itself is in Obama’s back pocket. And Obama LOVES the unions. OfA is sponsoring them.
Posted by: Jose | February 18, 2011, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
In contrast, Walker is resorting to political thuggery.
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 18, 2011 12:14:46 PM
WSJ: Besides limiting collective-bargaining rights for most workers—excepting police, firefighters and others involved in public safety—it would require government workers, who currently contribute little or nothing to their pensions, to contribute 5.8% of their pay to pensions, and pay at least 12.6% of health-care premiums, up from an average of 6%.
In exchange, Gov. Walker has pledged no layoffs or furloughs for the state’s 170,000 public employees.”
Doesn’t sound like political thuggery. He didn’t say, “I won. Elections have consequences.”
Posted by: wheresmymoney | February 18, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
“Doesn’t sound like political thuggery”
It is because it is about taking away rights moving forward and in perpetuity. That first little line you quoted is a doozy.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
“Maybe that’s because two Google execs…”
It is because it was inaccurate.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Political thuggery: “”Public employees are willing to contribute their pound of flesh. He wasn’t even willing to talk to the teacher unions despite 17 separate requests from them for meetings with him.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
despite 17 separate requests from them for meetings with him.”
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 18, 2011 12:32:39 PM
It sounds so unfair, unless it was the Dems blocking out Reps on Healthcare, etc. Then it was fine?
Posted by: wheresmymoney | February 18, 2011, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Wisconsin Law…946.12 Misconduct in public office. Any public officer or public employee who does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony: 946.12(1) (1) Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, non discretionary, ministerial duty of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law..
Posted by: Reality2014 | Feb 18, 2011 7:44:20 AM
The Dems that skipped town should be arrested and charged with a felony as soon as they return.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | February 18, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Before anyone exaggerates the true value of state employee benefits package – try reading about it first. Its about time that ALL workers stood up for their fair share. Business is suffering because ordinary folk are not creating demand – because of decades of stagnate wages, cuts to benefits, and decreasing opportunities. For thirty years the Republican party, with support from moderate Democrats fearful of standing up for labor, have pushed the income disparity to the most extreme it has ever been since before the Gilded Age. The economic power of this country must depends on strong middle class – not in more for the wealthiest. Raise taxes on the top 5% earners and leave the Public Safety workers, Teachers, and Other Public worker neighbors alone.
Posted by: Suminus | February 18, 2011, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Average annual pay and benefits for union-thug Wisconsin teachers: $89,500.
Average for American private-sector workers: $65,000. And they’re the ones who are paying the thugs, 100 cents out of every dollar.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Posted by: wheresmymoney | Feb 18, 2011 12:52:48 PM
Remember Baucus and the Gang of Six, Obama’s meetings and phone calls with several Republicans? The televised meetings of Obama with Republicans?
It was all over the news, blogs, press. As was the fact that the Koch brothers and lobbyists had told the Republicans to kill health care and they were heck bent on doing so no matter how much they were reached out to.
It’s quite a bit different than the situation in Wisconsin, where the governor ginned up a budget shortfall in order to take away worker rights.
Worker rights are human rights.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I am a car parts delivery driver in Cleveland. Guess what would happen if the five of us drivers were to leave work for three days to protest a bill not to our liking? NO JOB WHEN WE GOT BACK – AND RIGHTLY SO!!! “Atlas Shrugged” is no longer fiction. The inmates have taken over. The public sector is going to do this country in – IN THE NAME OF FAIRNESS? Oh yeah, I almost forgot, I am also a retired Cleveland Catholic teacher (intermediate).
Posted by: temagami | February 18, 2011, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
It’s quite a bit different than the situation in Wisconsin, where the governor ginned up a budget shortfall in order to take away worker rights.
Posted by: Alyson | Feb 18, 2011 1:16:02 PM
Proof of the “ginned up budget shortfall?”
Posted by: wheresmymoney | February 18, 2011, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Feb 18, 2011 1:15:03 PM
Here’s a news flash for you. Public sector employees including teachers are citizens and pay taxes. In other words, it is inaccurate to claim or insinuate that only private sector employees, let alone only those making less than teachers pay teacher salaries. In addition, your comparison is marred and useless. To make it useful, and less marred, try comparing the salaries of people holding private sector jobs that require a college degree and certification. Then calculate how many years they have to work, how much experience they have to have to reach the average.
Can’t wait to see an apples to apples comparison.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Gov “ginned up a budget shortfall in Wisconsin?” What lib professor dreamed up that one? You academics need to go out to the real world once in a while!!
Posted by: temagami | February 18, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Correction: it’s $89,500 for the WI unoun teachers. And that’s for nine months work.
It’s not defensible, and it is going to stop. Meanwhile, as they did in Greece, the pigs are squealing at the public trough.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Proof of the “ginned up budget shortfall?”
Posted by: wheresmymoney | Feb 18, 2011 1:21:22 PM
You can read the fiscal bureaus report online. As you know we can’t post links and it is a pdf file, but you can get access via a link at TPM. (“Wisconsin Gov. Walker Ginned Up Budget Shortfall To Undercut Worker Rights”) or the Wisconsin state legislature website. Walker pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
An auto mechanic in general has a heck of a lot more common sense than the “average” teacher does today. Most of them have to go to school and also get certified. AND…… they are not taking a bunch of mickey mouse courses!!! I should know – MA in Ed. Twenty-five years of teaching!!
Posted by: temagami | February 18, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
“In other words, it is inaccurate to claim or insinuate that only private sector employees, let alone only those making less than teachers pay teacher salaries”
I neither claim it nor insinuate it. What I claim is that 100% of teacher salaries and benefits are paid by taxpayer (a small portion of whom are teachers). Zero percent of the private-sector workers’ salaries are paid by taxpayers.
The taxpayers have spoken at the ballot box in the tradition of democracy. If the teachers don’t like the new rules, they can seek other employment.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Again, Fascist Hyena, try comparing the salaries of people holding private sector jobs that require a college degree and certification. Then calculate how many years they have to work, how much experience they have to have to reach the average.
Can’t wait to see an apples to apples comparison.
Teachers, firefighters, cops and other public sector middle class workers are not pigs at the trough. They are human beings, middle class Americans and taxpayers, citizens who contribute to this great nation– deserving of the right to protest and express themselves. Deserving of the opportunity to stand up for themselves and bargain. Demonizing and calling them less than human makes you less human, not them.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Fun fact, there are eight Republicans in Wisconsin who can be recalled right now, and when next January rolls around, a little over 500,000 petition signatures can trigger a recall election for Gov. Walker.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
It is like my Grandpa told me, the Republicans are all for the wealthy and the corporations but they will pretend like crazy that they care about ordinary people.
Wisconsin is a wonderful example. The governor gives tax breaks to the tune of $140 million to corporations then a few weeks later is taking $300 million from state workers. And he wants to take away their collective bargaining for wages and work rules!
Wouldn’t you love to know how he will fully balance the budget if these are his first two moves? The total shortfall is $3.6 billion. The middle-class in Wisconsin is about to get robbed but I bet the wealthy will get by without any loss.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
FDR explained most eloquently almost 75 years ago why collective bargaining should never be extended to public employees. in Wisconsin, all that has been proposed is that they cannot bargain for their health and pension benefits–they can still bargain for their wages, which is more than FDR would have allowed.
No one here has yet shown the courage to respond to FDR’s wise counsel.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I am awaiting the first union denunciation of the Hitler and crosshairs posters.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Fascist Hyena, where on the ballot did it say that collective bargaining would be a thing of the past? It is the over-reaching for power that people are objecting to, not pay freezes or paying more for insurance or pensions.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
What happens when you have more people riding in the cart than are pulling it? Enter Obama and the mushrooming public sector. Public sector earned dollars do little for the economy compared to private sector earned dollars. You got – the cart stops. Sooner or later it will stop. In all probability with our children and grandchildren getting “STUCK” with the bill.
Posted by: temagami | February 18, 2011, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Lydia wrote:
“it isn’t true that federal employees make more than those with the same job in the private sector, the study cited by usa today and fox news is skewed as it lumps together all workers of all occupations.”
It is apparent that you haven’t read the study.
USA TODAY reported in March 2010 that the federal government pays an average of 20% more than private firms for comparable occupations
Posted by: Joe White | February 18, 2011, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I do not want this president to be successful in his “economic” agenda. Socialism did not work in Europe and will not work here. Give me a rich fatcat who will employ people any day over a pathetic lib complaining about his rights – ESPECIALLY WHEN THE TAXPAYER IS PICKING UP THE TAB!!
Posted by: Manitu | February 18, 2011, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Joe White, nope they didn’t compare like occupations and locations. Obviously an accountant in N.Y. is going to get paid a lot more than one out in Iowa. Because a lot of feds work in the biggest, most expensive places to live, you have to compare the pay grades of those who work in the private sector in the same location.
Sheesh.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“Wisconsin teachers pay as much as $1100 each year in compulsory union dues. If the legislation passes, they will no longer be required to pay those dues – returning that money to their own pockets.”
draconian
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
To the protesters in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states. Would you rather go along with the proposed program or either wind up with no job or with a job that pays you vouchers instead of a pay check? Can’t happen here? Any bets? Go read “Atlas Shrugged.” Don’t look in your college library for it. Doubt if you can find it there.
Posted by: Manitu | February 18, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Political thuggery: “”Public employees are willing to contribute their pound of flesh. He wasn’t even willing to talk to the teacher unions despite 17 separate requests from them for meetings with him.”
You mean like when Obama refused to meet with Republicans until Scott Brown was elected and he saw the tide turning?
ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES. Unless you’re a Democrat, then you try to ignore the will of the people, don’t perform your legal duties, waive crude political signs, and use violence and intimidation to get what you want because the voters are too stupid to agree that you should keep giving them more and more of your money.
Posted by: Jose | February 18, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
“Obviously an accountant in N.Y. is going to get paid a lot more than one out in Iowa. Because a lot of feds work in the biggest, most expensive places to live, you have to compare the pay grades of those who work in the private sector in the same location.
Sheesh.” – Lydia
And when the same kind of apples-to-apples comparison is done, and it shows that women earn 95% of what men earn for the same job in the same area, liberals hem and haw and say that, well, you can’t do that kind of analysis because women are shut out of jobs.
Public sector employees, especially teachers, are overwhelmingly Democrats. They form unions to pay themselves even more. Then they say you can’t make a fair comparison between them and the rest of the population.
Sheesh!
Posted by: Jose | February 18, 2011, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
No one here has yet shown the courage to respond to FDR’s wise counsel.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Feb 18, 2011 1:48:19 PM
Try Salon: “Why FDR would support the Wisconsin protests;A labor historian explains: Roosevelt opposed government unions, but by the ’50s he would have changed his mind.”
What I find more interesting is the discussion about why those employed in the private sector and lean right are so bitter: “the private sector has done so poorly at creating a really broad growing thriving middle class in the past 20 years. And without a broad growing, thriving middle class, government workers are increasingly isolated and increasingly under threat and it is easy to play the dynamic this way, unfortunately for them.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
“You mean like when Obama refused to meet with Republicans”
No, because that never happened.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
draconian
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Feb 18, 2011 2:09:40 PM
Obviously, they’d rather pay their dues than be stripped of rights.
Worker rights are human rights.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Go read “Atlas Shrugged.”
It’s a horrid story. Very poorly written. If you want to send them to read a right wing tome, at least pick one that is well written. Try Road to Serfdom by Hayek. Even Keynes loved it. Didn’t think there was much that was practical in it, but the ideal is compelling. Atlas Shrugged is a mess.
I love this quote. I’ve seen it here, but it’s worth repeating:
“There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.” –Raj Patel
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Lydia wrote:
“nope they didn’t compare like occupations and locations. Obviously an accountant in N.Y….”
Again, it’s apparent that you haven’t even read it, because you’re still trying to deny that they compared like occupations, which they did.
And without a shred of evidence to support it, you now desperately lunge to grab onto ‘they didn’t compare them in the same locations’.
Posted by: Joe White | February 18, 2011, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
“It’s a horrid story. Very poorly written.”
Isn’t it an irony that the “greatest” literary achievement by a conservative cannot compete in the marketplace of ideas without a heavy subsidy. In particular, Ayn Rand was held up as an anti-communist hero by the US government, while her peers were rooted out by McCarthy and their careers terminated by the very big government that Rand “opposed”. (Rand even testified to the government against her fellow writers… even while writing books celebrating unrestricted “intellectual freedom”). Later in life, she used her married name to collect government assistance.
Initially, Rand’s career was supported by the US government as part of its Cold War Strategy. Today, the Objectivists pay to have the book published and circulated and bribe students into reading it by offering cash prizes.
So… if you believe that each should be rewarded according to the merits of his work…. Ayn Rand’s undeserved status as a writer and philosopher ought to annoy you.
Posted by: blip | February 18, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
“Give me a rich fatcat who will employ people”
I think we all agree that we would like to find such a man. Especially one who is willing to create jobs in the US.
That’s the problem. The “Job Creators” that the Republicans want us to bow and worship…. we can never bow as low as Third World Sweatshop workers. Why pay an American minimum wage when there is a child in Pakistan who can be chained to a sewing machine and forced to work at gunpoint?
The Republicans need to just say it plain…. we need to roll back our labor laws about 100 years, we need to roll back our standard of living, we need to roll back our aspirations…. so we can compete with child labor in China.
No wonder they find unions so offensive.
Posted by: blip | February 18, 2011, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Alyson – obviously you have never actually read “Atlas shrugged.” It is not easy reading, but as in the novel, events happening in the US today are taking us to a fast track of self destruction in the name of “fairness” and rights.” Libs beginning with BO have no understanding of capitalism. How can they possibly/ Most of the lib experience is in the world of academia and or employment in the public sector. That is why we are in financial chaos and that is why November happened!
Posted by: Manitu | February 18, 2011, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Perhaps the greedy pigs will next be oinking and squealing at New York City’s trough:
“Mayor Bloomberg vowed yesterday to keep up the pressure on state lawmakers to abolish the ‘last in, first out’ rules for laying off city teachers as he unveiled a $65.6 billion spending plan that calls for the largest reduction in the teaching force since the 1970s.
“’In terms of doing with fewer teachers, that’s the budget reality, and that’s one of the reasons why you need [to change] LIFO. The fact of the matter is not everybody is a great teacher. What we’ve got to constantly do is improve the pool and making sure better people are working,’ Bloomberg said.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Re “Atlas Shrugged.” Most widely read published book next to the Christian Bible. Not bad for a “Horrible, poorly written book. Talk about being in denial!!
Posted by: temagami | February 18, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Blip -did you actually objectively analyze an issue without trashing the person involved? The message sent in “Atlas Shrugged” is exactly what is happening today in the US. Any Rand knew a “little more” about the USSR – as she came from there.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 18, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
“I think we all agree that we would like to find such a man. Especially one who is willing to create jobs in the US.”
At some point you might want to enquire why no hiring is taking place in the US today. Begin with the inescapable fact that employers will take on a new employee when it makes economic sense to do so, and they won’t take one on when it does not. It’s a matter of the cost and the benefit of hiring.
What will be the cost of taking on a new employee? No employer can possibly know the answer today: in the past year there have been not one but two new 2,000-page federal laws passed, both of which will have very substantial effects on that cost, but no one can know what they will be. All that is known is that the cost will increase. Let the unions–public and private–complain all they like.
The laws of economics cannot and will not be repealed.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“The message sent in “Atlas Shrugged” is exactly what is happening today in the US.”
To an extent, you are right. Except that our individual hopes and dreams are not being crushed by the government.
They are being crushed by big businesses which can cut our workers off at the knees by sending their jobs overseas, sucking all the equity out of our greatest asset (our homes), and withdrawing from the social contract….
America is not dying because our workers are paid too well.
America is dying because we have no belief in our own society.
We are a nation run by selfish, Randian brats… who, much like their idol, have benefitted immensely from the common sacrifice of the American people, but are willing to “shrug” off their obligation to this great nation when the time comes for them to pay it forward.
I only point out Rand’s hypocrisy because it ironically supports my claim that Objectivism is an unworkable theory for self-absorbed juveniles.
Posted by: blip | February 18, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
But, yeah. Rand’s book is right up there with Battlefield Earth.
Posted by: blip | February 18, 2011, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
The laws of economics cannot and will not be repealed
——————-
But they will be misrepresented. This oft repeated claim that companies aren’t hiring because of uncertainty is convenient hyperbole…there is always uncertainty in business. The lack of hiring can be accounted for by lack of demand alone.
Posted by: Skip | February 18, 2011, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
“The laws of economics cannot and will not be repealed”
Economics is not a “law,” dude. The government prints IOUs and we call it, money.
All the rich people in the world agree that this is how are lives should be run.
And, so we run around working for people who already have every advantage that life could ever offer them (except for human decency, which they believe they can buy).
If you want to insist that this is some immutable law of nature like gravity…. you are a sucker.
Posted by: blip | February 18, 2011, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
A new poll from the Washington-based Clarus Group asked:
Do you think government employees should be represented by labor unions that bargain for higher pay, benefits and pensions … or do you think government employees should not be represented by labor unions?
A full 64% of the respondents said “no.”
That includes 42% of Democrats, and an overwhelming majority of Republicans. Only 49% of Democrats think public workers should be in unions at all.
That’s on the fundamental right to organize, before you get to wages and benefits. And that puts Scott Walker in a pretty good political place.
We’re winning in the court of public opinion.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
“uncertainty” is a vague nothing.
And we are supposed to get down on our knees and provide certainty by promising to submit to the lash from now to eternity.
If businesses want certainty, they should do what they are already doing…. and move their factories to authoritarian countries where they can buy a dictator and an army to create certainty.
But as long as we have elections, there isn’t going to be the kind of certainty that will please them. As long as we want a say in our lives, that’s too much uncertainty for them
I cannot believe what complete and utter tools the Republicans have become for corporate power. And I am ashamed that the actual rank-and-file members of the GOP actually believe in this mantra that we need to re-engineer our system of laws to create certainty for big business.
What about certainty for workers!
Posted by: blip | February 18, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
“A full 64% of the respondents said “no.”"
The Clarus Group also did a poll on public support for corporations…. and got similar numbers.
So, following your logic… the government should try to take down business, too.
Sign me up, comrade!
Posted by: blip | February 18, 2011, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Blip -it is obvious that you never read “Atlas Shrugged” either. You mention “Big Business”, but you do not recognize the regulations and red tape that small businesses have to put up with from the Fed too – in the name of fairness, equality etc. The fed is crushing the incentive to start, continue or expand businesses as in the novel.
Capitalism together with the Judeo/Christian ethic built this country. Yet, all three entities are under attack by legions of those who have no idea what makes our system works.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 18, 2011, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
The real news from Wisconsin:
In its Jan. 31 memo to legislators on the condition of the state’s budget, the Fiscal Bureau determined that the state will end the year with a balance of $121.4 million.
Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit — it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January. If the Legislature were simply to rescind Walker’s new spending schemes — or delay their implementation until they are offset by fresh revenues — the “crisis” would not exist.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 18, 2011, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Elections???? A lot of good democratic elections did Wisconsin…Do your job in which you were elected to do…Vote for God’s sake and return another day to fight back control instead of running into the night turning you back on voters…any respect I had for the Unions is G.O.N.E…..As someone who votes in California with the State Assembly controlled by Dems, FOREVER, with a budget deficit in Billions, you don’t see the minority Republicans running from their responsibility and avoiding the call to vote….WOW AND THEY CALL US CALIFORNIANS NUTS…..
Posted by: Parallex View | February 18, 2011, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
From One Wisconsin Now:
Walker has approved $140 million in new special-interest spending that includes:
“• $25 million for an economic development fund for job creation that still has $73 million due to a lack of job creation. Walker is creating a $25 million hole which will not create or retain jobs.
“• $48 million for private health savings accounts, which primarily benefit the wealthy. A study from the federal Governmental Accountability Office showed the average adjusted gross income of HSA participants was $139,000 and nearly half of HSA participants reported withdrawing nothing from their HSA, evidence that it is serving as a tax shelter for wealthy participants.
“• $67 million for a tax shift plan, so ill-conceived that at best the benefit provided to ‘job creators’ would be less than a dollar a day per new job, and may be as little as 30 cents a day.”
Posted by: Flash Override | February 18, 2011, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Let me get this straight. A Republican was elected governor in Wisconsin because the state is ending the year in the black? I need to meet this guy to help me with with my sales business!!
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 18, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Way to go Governor Walker. You told the voters what you would do had the guts to follow through. You are a “Statesman” not a political hack the protesters are used to deal with. Good show!!
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 18, 2011, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Joe White, It is a fact that federal employees are not paid more than private employees for the same job. I get my info from factcheck rather than a partisan group like the Cato Institute where usa today got their info.
We all need to be careful where the original source comes from, as skewed results from the truth are easy enough to create with a little tweak.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Fascist Hyena, the average pay for a Wisconsin teacher is $48,000 not the ridiculous $89,000 you quoted. Make a point but don’t spread lies.
Posted by: Lydia | February 18, 2011, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Pay? When you toss in gov paid benefits and perks there is no comparison. And….HOW ABOUT THE ISSUE OF LAYOFF OR GETTING FIRED?? Again….NO COMPARISON. Time for public employees to chill out. Taxpayers are fed-up with the mushrooming numbers of public employees they have to support – AND SO AM I!!!
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 18, 2011, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Fascist Hyena, the average pay for a Wisconsin teacher is $48,000 not the ridiculous $89,000 you quoted. Make a point but don’t spread lies.
Posted by: Lydia |
I don’t see any mention of the ~30K in benefits they receive in your response. Countering a “lie” with a half-truth is typically a poor strategy.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
I believe that $48,348.00 ($48,000.00) figure was cited by the Economic Policy Institute as quoted by the New York Times, “a liberal leaning organization.” You know when the NYT admits to an organization as be “liberal leaning” you can take the information to the bank…No one trying to make it economically is going to extend sympathy to a union who is bulking at 5.8 percent contribution to pension fund, most private corps are doing away with theirs, or a small 12.6 percent contribution of health care MONTHLY PREMIUMS…Most, if lucky enough to get it, pay a lot more in the private sector…..
Posted by: Parallex View | February 18, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Re “Atlas Shrugged.” Most widely read published book next to the Christian Bible. Not bad for a “Horrible, poorly written book. Talk about being in denial!!
Posted by: temagami | Feb 18, 2011 3:39:18 PM
If you’re talking about yourself being in denial, then yeah, let’s talk about it, because a lot of horribly written books from an art and literature standpoint sell well given the tendency of the average person not to be put off by redundancy. In fact, the unwashed masses tend to need it so as not to miss a point.The beating over the head, the long passages of exposition in the form of boring and stilted lectures and the over the top telling versus showing appeals to them.
It doesn’t change my point or make me wrong. It’s horribly, horribly written, and the ideas are not all that profound. Rand herself was a mess
(great post @ 3:09:40 PM, BLIP)
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
One more thing for temagami, what is your source for your claim that Atlas Shrugged is the “most widely read published book next to the Christian Bible.” I tried to verify and could not. The best selling books, following the bible are Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong by Mao Zedong, The Qur’an, Xinhua Zidian, The Book of Mormon,
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone,
And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie, The Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, The Da Vinci Code, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, The Catcher in the Rye, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix , Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban , Ben Hur: A Tale of the Christ , Heidi, The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho, The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care by Dr. Benjamin Spock,The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry,. The Mark of Zorro, etc. Other book lists include the Chronicles of Narnia series, the Guinness Book of World Records and the World Almanac.
Where is Atlas Shrugged? Where do you get your information and what did you base your claim on?
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
“A new statewide poll shows that 65 percent of Wisconsin residents think that Walker has gone too far in his attack on public employees. ”
He can be recalled next January.
Posted by: Alyson | February 18, 2011, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
It is truly wonderful to have the foul stench of the public employee unions let out of the bottle for all the nation to sniff. They do not like this fetid miasma one bit.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Recalling the Governor does not “recall” the deficit…..”We’re broke.” Gotta love “maybe if we ignore the bills they will go away” Dems….
Posted by: Parallex View | February 18, 2011, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
2-faced Obama decries government criticism when it’s directed at him and his cronies. But when it’s directed at a fiscal conservative in government, Obama fans the flames of uproar and continues to poke the hornets nest of rebellion as protesters occupy government buildings.
Posted by: EPU | February 18, 2011, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Pelosi told reporters Friday that the protests are “an extraordinary show of democracy in action.”
. . . and then she says what about Tea Party rallies?
It’s more like “an extraordinary show of hypocrisy in action” on the part of Pelosi, Obama, and other double standard liberals in politics. What part of
‘cut back on government spending” do these people not understand?
Posted by: EPU | February 18, 2011, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
But when it’s directed at a fiscal conservative in government, Obama fans the flames of uproar and continues to poke the hornets nest of rebellion as protesters occupy government buildings.
Posted by: EPU |
community organizing
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Most people think that “Democracy in action” means elections–like we had in November–and legislators convening to legislate. The bubble-headed Pelosi thunks something else.
Hard-working people who make their way in the private sector are nauseated at the spectacle of greedy, tenured parasitic vermin shrieking and bawling at the public trough.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Is that why OBAMA has his Organizing for Obama group being bused to Wisconsin to protest. I know they sent me an e-mail, go to the site and you will see. Now the the democratic party is doing the same thing. SEIU your agenda is my agenda said Obama
“We Are Arizona” His speech about civility and being mindful.. I knew it was a bunch a baloney
Posted by: firedup49 | February 18, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
“We all remember how liberal news coverage of tea party rallies rarely failed to note that they were “predominantly white.” Somehow, that is no longer a salient fact when the same outlets cover illegal sick-outs by Wisconsin teachers. Why would that be?”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 18, 2011, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Meanwhile in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Illinois this years 3.5 billion bond sale to fund their woefully underfunded state employee pension fund has been postponed due to …
“We are receiving a great deal of international interest on these bonds. It is only appropriate to give investors time to digest the governor’s budget speech which is Wednesday,” said Kelly Kraft, the spokeswoman.
That’s right. Folks are lining up to invest in Illinois!
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 18, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Hard-working people who make their way in the private sector are nauseated at the spectacle of greedy, tenured parasitic vermin shrieking and bawling at the public trough
———————–
People who provide government services whether it is debated whether they are overcompensated or not are only considered parasites by nauseating corporate peons who willing grab their ankles for their taskmasters to assuage their petty fears and elect true parasites to elected office, who make no meaningful contribution to government, but rather sell it out to the highest bidders instead.
Posted by: Skip | February 19, 2011, 12:12 am 12:12 am
That’s quite a world view, Skip. Are you a union member?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 19, 2011, 12:25 am 12:25 am
“What about certainty for workers!” – Blip
You work.
You make money.
Later on you die.
Oh and I almost forgot
You Pay Taxes, sometimes even after you die.
Posted by: Noz | February 19, 2011, 12:28 am 12:28 am
I’m not a union member. I’m not even a big fan of unions, but I don’t have a pathological disdain for government and government workers, and have little respect for those who seek to vilify people who really work for a living but are accused of being overpaid. Especially with the huge disparity in incomes which exists today. You want to see real pigs squealing at real troughs? -Real BIG troughs…make industry clean up their emissions without squealing about it. The cost passed to the consumer would only be marginal at best.
Posted by: Skip | February 19, 2011, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Lydia wrote:
” It is a fact that federal employees are not paid more than private employees for the same job. I get my info from factcheck rather than a partisan group like the Cato Institute where usa today got their info.
We all need to be careful where the original source comes from, as skewed results from the truth are easy enough to create with a little tweak. ”
You continue to prove that you’ve not even read the information you are claiming to refute.
No, USA Today didn’t get their data from Cato.
There’s this thing called google. Why don’t you use it to read the USA Today article and maybe you’ll stop making yourself look……..nah, never mind you won’t read it.
Posted by: Joe White | February 19, 2011, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Skip, not only is the cost to the consumer minimal, but there are also gains to the consumer, since we won’t have to pay as many asthma treatments and our property values won’t suffer.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 19, 2011, 8:58 am 8:58 am
what makes unions think they are better and privileged then the regular working middle class that has to cut back?
Even Obama in his speeches said it tough time and we all have to tighten our belts.
Dose that mean only the middle class and not his union buddies?
His We are Arizona speech about being civil was just a bunch of baloney
I am glad I am not paying union dues for this …
Nice lesson for the children if you want something be a bully even to your parents
Posted by: firedup49 | February 19, 2011, 9:27 am 9:27 am
I hope it is union busting.
Posted by: Freedom | February 19, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Lydia,
Apparently you don’t watch ABC World News Tonight. They did their own fact check last night and showed that public employees generally get paid more, although occasionally there are exceptions (like for accountants).
And they are far more likely to get health benefits and pensions, and when they do they pay much less for them than in the private sector.
You need to get your facts straight.
Posted by: Jose | February 19, 2011, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Leftist Joe Klein:
“Industrial unions are organized against the might and greed of ownership. Public employees unions are organized against the might and greed…of the public?”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 19, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am
ABC, why aren’t you showing the crosshairs posters with the governor in the crosshairs?
Posted by: wheresmymoney | February 19, 2011, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Fire all of the Wisconsin Teachers and start again hiring non-union Teachers.
Problem Solved, short and long term.
Posted by: Noz | February 19, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
I’m not a union member. I’m not even a big fan of unions, but I don’t have a pathological disdain for government and government workers, and have little respect for those who seek to vilify people who really work for a living but are accused of being overpaid. Especially with the huge disparity in incomes which exists today. You want to see real pigs squealing at real troughs? -Real BIG troughs…make industry clean up their emissions without squealing about it. The cost passed to the consumer would only be marginal at best.
Posted by: Skip |
I’m not sure where the pathological line is but we both express buckets of disdain on a daily basis. My view would be that lack of disdain of government is pathological.
Consider that the S&L crisis of the late 80′s saw hundreds of bankers go to prison. Fast forward to the sub-prime mortgage cdo financial meltdown. Not one banker has seen jail time.
Don’t miss Matt Taibbi’s current “Why isn’t Wall Street in Jail?”.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 19, 2011, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Fire all of the Wisconsin Teachers and start again hiring non-union Teachers.
Problem Solved, short and long term.
Posted by: Noz |
Mister we could use a man like Ronald Reagan again.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 19, 2011, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
There they go, its the ‘Activists’ from Tea Party, better known as the Opportunist Party, and they brought a message from their party leader Little General Sarah Palin, they wanted a piece of Wisconsin action too.
Posted by: kritik1 | February 19, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Replying to the remarks of FASCIST
HYENA.
Whats this. Some kind of brain-wash that the workers themselves don’t want extra money in their pay check.
Don’t think for a moment every body is stupid and gullible.
Posted by: kritik1 | February 19, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“We all remember how liberal news coverage of tea party rallies rarely failed to note that they were “predominantly white.” Somehow, that is no longer a salient fact when the same outlets cover illegal sick-outs by Wisconsin teachers. Why would that be?”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Feb 18, 2011 11:31:14 PM
90% of Wisconsin is caucasian and the crowds of protestors are roughly 90% caucasian in keeping with the composition of the state. In addition, there isn’t an overdose of signage that is blatantly racist. Hate groups had booths at several tea party rallies and there was racist signage. Moreover, many were probably looking for any clues as to whether the tea party would pull the Republican party toward becoming more inclusive. It wasn’t to be.
Posted by: Alyson | February 19, 2011, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
The tea party leader is not Palin, it is Koch Industries.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 19, 2011, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
This is in reply to Verne.
Who told you that we all wanted the Tea Party to get our country back.
Are you nuts, how can we liberals even think such a thing.
Posted by: kritik1 | February 19, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
One of the leaders of the Tea Party
is Sarah Palin. Do you want to
dissapoint her?
Posted by: kritik1 | February 19, 2011, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
The tea party leader is not Palin, it is Koch Industries.
Posted by: Flash Override | Feb 19, 2011 3:15:40 PM
Yep, and the new House spending bill is a wet dream for them as it goes after the EPA, barring them from regulating greenhouse gas emissions and stopping them from enforcing clean-water rules. Unbelievable.
Posted by: Alyson | February 19, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
You need to get your facts straight.
Posted by: Jose | Feb 19, 2011 10:35:56 AM
It would be helpful if you get your facts straight so you could deal with them appropriately when confronted with them:
“Wisconsin public-sector workers face an annual compensation penalty of 11%. Adjusting for the slightly fewer hours worked per week on average, these public workers still face a compensation penalty of 5% for choosing to work in the public sector.”
This study was adjusted to compare apples to apples.
Posted by: Alyson | February 19, 2011, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Yes Alyson, you are right.
They want to believe that the climate
change is just a phase and the
environment has undergone such
changes for thousands of years.
Little do they have feeling for our
children and the next generation.
Posted by: kritik1 | February 19, 2011, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Teacher protesters in Wisconsin getting doctor’s excuses for being absent from work? What the heck is that all about? These protesters are are a few bricks short – barring no vote on bill, all they are doing is forcing their own layoffs. Dumb.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 19, 2011, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Isn’t it funny that the survey done by the Clarus Group only asked one question and got a negative response towards unions but the Pew Research Survey showed 45 to 41 in favor of unions in general, 48 to 40 for unions representing public workers and 48 to 37 in favor of unions representing workers in private companies?
This tells me that the wording of the Clarus Group, specifically that it mentioned unions representing public workers bargaining for higher pay and pensions made taxpayers nervous. It does not mean the majority doesn’t support unions as a very good thing.
Every working person should support the protesters efforts in Wisconsin. Unions are the only thing between us and a constantly lowered standard of living if the wealthy had their way.
Jose, I do have my facts straight. Read the article in the news section of abc.
Posted by: Lydia | February 19, 2011, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
my friends and neighbors..pay for their own hc and benifits..if they can afford it…
.
.Milwaukee, Wisconsin] MacIver News Service – For the first time in history, the average annual compensation for a teacher in the Milwaukee Public School system will exceed $100,000.
That staggering figure was revealed last night at a meeting of the MPS School Board.
The average salary for an MPS teacher is $56,500. When fringe benefits are factored in, the annual compensation will be $100,005 in 2011
Posted by: smartethenyou | February 19, 2011, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
shouldnt it be against the law..for a org..to donate money to a political party ..with tax payers dollars….
Posted by: smarterthenyou | February 19, 2011, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
No matter which way you ad it up – THE MONEY HAS RUN OUT!! DUH!! States are in competition with each other for private sector jobs. Gov Walker KNOWS this economic fact of life and is responding accordingly. Every teacher (I am one) should be employed by the private sector for a least a year to at least partially understand what makes this country run.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 19, 2011, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Smartethenyou, I wouldn’t believe the news service you quoted as it is written by a ultra-right wing source. Especially since every major news source I just checked has the average salary for Wisconsin teachers at $48,000, ranked 26th amongst all the states.
It would be more honest to google or just fact check with major news sources than to quote one little group with a strong bias, and apparently the will to bend the truth.
What do you think about the Wisconsin governor claiming a $137 million dollar deficit at the same point in time as he pushed through $140 million in tax breaks for corporations? I smell a rat.
Posted by: Lydia | February 19, 2011, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Tom Barnow, the money hasn’t ‘run out’.
A combination of events created the budget shortfalls. The economic collapse caused by the greed of the banking industry, lost people jobs across the country. Less jobs= less tax income as well as additional expense for the states like unemployment payouts, welfare, etc.
Additionally many states did not put money aside each year for pensions that they had promised, just as many companies do not.
None of this was the taxpayers fault or the teachers fault or the fireman’s fault, but the result of bad leadership at very high levels.
Nonetheless the workers at the protest have said again and again that they are willing to negotiate give-backs without an invitation to do so from the governor.
Again, bad leadership is making things ugly for regular folk.
Posted by: Lydia | February 19, 2011, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Tom Barnow, I need to add to the list of reasons why Wisconsin is out of money. Since 2003 they have made a series of tax cuts that have cut their states income by $3.7 billion.
While the Governor of Wisconsin is calling a $137 million shortfall this year, others estimate they will break even.
So has the Governor set up this situation to be a budget crisis when there wasn’t any before his new tax breaks? Is his agenda really union busting as well as taking money from the teachers, etc. to give more tax breaks to the wealthy?
Those 70,000 protesters seem to be right to object to this new governor’s manipulative actions.
Posted by: Lydia | February 19, 2011, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
EVAN THOMAS, NEWSWEEK: Only the President, only the President can break the logjam. His State of the Union was a profile in cowardice. His budget is a profile in cowardice. I hope there’s a secret plan he has here to come forward to lead us, but he hasn’t shown it yet.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 20, 2011, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Lydia wants Wisconsin to raise taxes. The people of Wisconsin don’t want to pay more taxes. Instead they want to break the corrupt circle of Democrat politicians bargaining with public employee unions with the taxpayers’ money.
It is democracy in action. The rate of taxation in Wisconsin will be determined by its elected officials, not by grotesquely pampered unions.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 20, 2011, 12:56 am 12:56 am
“Fascist Hyena, the average pay for a Wisconsin teacher is $48,000 not the ridiculous $89,000 you quoted. Make a point but don’t spread lies.”
I quoted the figure for salary plus medical and pension benefits. That’s the value of their compensation, and that’s for nine months’ work.
They are overpaid with taxpayers’ money by the monopoly for whom they work. That is going to stop, and if they don’t like it they can actually go out into the marketplace and compete for work. But if they find it, they won’t get tenure after two years. Tough.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 20, 2011, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Congratulations to the UW doctors and the overpaid public-employee teachers for conspiring to issue false medical certifications of illness.
FDR understood that it was improper and unwise for public employees to unionize. Now we see why, and the error is going to be corrected.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 20, 2011, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Wisconsin Journal-Sentinel, December 2008:
“The average salary for Wisconsin public school teachers rose 2.4% last school year, capping a decade in which teachers in only seven other states saw their pay increase by less, according to a new survey by the National Education Association.
“With an average salary of $49,051 in the 2007-’08 academic year, the state’s teachers ranked 21st in pay nationally. That was a slip from the year before, when they averaged $47,901 in pay but ranked 20th in the nation, according to the NEA annual survey….
“But while teachers in Wisconsin may not have seen their salaries increase as much as their counterparts elsewhere, that hasn’t been true of their benefit packages. Reports from the U.S. Census show that Wisconsin has some of the highest per-pupil costs for benefits paid to teachers, ranking third in the nation for 2006, the most recent year for which information was available.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 20, 2011, 1:23 am 1:23 am
“Walker isn’t at fault for the current year’s shortfall, but he is at fault for making the shortfall worse over the next two-year cycle.Wisconsin’s public sector workers have already taken a 3% cut in wages over the past two years. Maybe that’s enough, maybe it isn’t. But Walker has taken an already pressing problem, made it incrementally worse, and then used it not just as an excuse to bargain hard on wages and benefits, but as an excuse to gut Wisconsin’s public unions entirely. (The Democratic-leaning ones, anyway.) It’s just not a good faith exercise.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 20, 2011, 2:54 am 2:54 am
“Walker’s attack on public unions does nothing to fix [the budget shortfall he made worse]. The unions have already agreed to work with the governor to help fix the deficit. It’s the Republicans who are playing politics and using this budget issue to take on the unions. This has nothing to do with deficits.”
Posted by: Alyson | February 20, 2011, 2:55 am 2:55 am
“Right to work” states are “killing” states like Wisconsin and Ohio where I am from. People are leaving northern states in droves for the south and southwest where there the jobs are going to “AND WHERE THERE ARE NO LOCAL AND STATE TAXES TO PAY FOR AN INFLATED PUBLIC SECTOR!!
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 20, 2011, 7:12 am 7:12 am
Let me understand this – Wisconsin elected a Republican governor because the state was “supposedly” in the black? Right.
Posted by: Manitu | February 20, 2011, 8:15 am 8:15 am
fascist hyena, stop misrepresenting what I said.
The governor pushed through tax breaks weeks before he declared a shortfall of the same amount. That is simply abhorrent. He is clearly trying to bust the unions. Working people everywhere should understand the principle that no unions would mean working for minimum wage eventually, little benefits, etc.
Posted by: Lydia | February 20, 2011, 11:05 am 11:05 am
The teachers in Wisconsin are not overpaid, they rank 26th compared to other states. This governor created a shortfall weeks ago with tax breaks to bust unions.
No logical person could say that the new tax breaks will stimulate Wisconsin’s economy enough to make up for the wages lost by all those middle-class workers. The governor is trying to bust the unions plain and simple, which would drive down wages for all working people.
Look at how stagnant the middle class income has been for the last 10 years and compare it to the huge gains of the wealthy. This is class warfare, plain and simple.
Posted by: Lydia | February 20, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Foghorn Leghorn, which party pushed through the financial de-regulation that caused the banking crisis? Which party always screams that regulation has to go? The Republican party lacks the logic to see that the degree to which they allow corporations to act unfettered, the economy, small business and the middle class is hurt.
Did you know that small businesses must now wait as long as 60, 90 or 120 days to be paid for their goods or services sold to big corporations, instead of the customary 30 days? Yeah, tell me how that won’t hurt small businesses big time. If government won’t regulate, the greed of corporations will kill our economy.
Posted by: Lydia | February 20, 2011, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Any tea party member against state workers at the Wisconsin protest is either wealthy or working class but clueless that he is fighting on the wrong side of the issue.
Busting unions, weakening unions will lead to lower wages, less benfits, etc. for all workers.
Posted by: Lydia | February 20, 2011, 11:15 am 11:15 am
People are leaving northern states in droves for the south and southwest where there the jobs are going to “AND WHERE THERE ARE NO LOCAL AND STATE TAXES TO PAY FOR AN INFLATED PUBLIC SECTOR!!
Posted by: Tom Barnow |
These refugees present a big problem for their destinations as vox day points out…
“Needless to say, no matter where they go, this couple will cling to their liberal Obama-voting ideology and continue to demand the very big government that they fled in Illinois. They are ideological disease carriers. The only viable solution I can imagine is permitting such refugees to move into a limited government state if they are willing to sign a consent form giving up their right to vote for as long as they were resident in their former state. Although perhaps even that is taking too big a risk since they’ll probably settle in an enclave of like-minded carriers. This should be a legally defensible approach since if one doesn’t wish to give up one’s right to vote, one doesn’t have to reside there.”
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 20, 2011, 11:41 am 11:41 am
“Foghorn Leghorn, which party pushed through the financial regulation that caused the banking crisis?” – Lydia
That would be the Democrats with their ill-conceived idea that people who couldn’t afford homes should still be able to get loans to buy them.
Posted by: Noz | February 20, 2011, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Alyson,
The average Wisconsin teacher gets $25,000 each year in benefits on top of their $50,000 salary.
You can just focus on salary to try to make your point, but that would be intellectually dishonest.
Posted by: Jose | February 20, 2011, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
“Wisconsin public-sector workers face an annual compensation penalty of 11%. Adjusting for the slightly fewer hours worked per week on average, these public workers still face a compensation penalty of 5% for choosing to work in the public sector.”
More importantly, in Wisonsin, they have agreed to giving another pound of their flesh, despite having taken a 3% cut already, recently. That isn’t the issue. The issue is a seat at the table, which Walker wants to strip away.
Posted by: Alyson | February 20, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
This is class warfare, plain and simple.
Posted by: Lydia | Feb 20, 2011 11:08:45 AM
Yes. The GOP of the last decade defined itself by its warmongering and government and surveillance state building in the name of “the war terror.” It engaged in other wars covertly. This decade’s GOP is dropping the pretense and engaging in a flat-out war on the middle class, science, common sense and women.
Posted by: Alyson | February 20, 2011, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
If public employees including teachers get their way I wonder what their response will be when they wind up with no job, layoffs or vouchers instead of paychecks – oh I forgot, this is the USA – it can’t happen here. There IS always money available. Any bets? The real question is one of jobs. South and west have them. Rust belt DOES NOT HAVE THEM. You do the research as to why – then MAYBE… you can figure out where Gov Walker is coming from. Retired Catholic teacher from Cleveland.
Posted by: Manitu | February 20, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
You can just focus on salary to try to make your point…
Posted by: Jose | Feb 20, 2011 1:19:53 PM
Oh, I won’t just focus on salary. I’ll include this as well:
“Only 5 states do not have collective bargaining for educators and have deemed it illegal. Those states and their ranking on ACT/SAT scores are as follows:
South Carolina – 50th
North Carolina – 49th
Georgia – 48th
Texas – 47th
Virginia – 44th”
Busting up those unions sure solved a lot of problems… not.
Wisconsin ranked 2nd in the country.
Posted by: Alyson | February 20, 2011, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Hell, Mr. President..those “unionists” are more than just that…they are also our relatives….it’s the few that you talk to…you know, the big shots in those unions who dig up campaign dollars for you and whip the peons into shape to vote for you….those are the cruds who have to go………..right?
Posted by: justj joey | February 20, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Alyson – you are assuming that there is some sort of correlation between ACT scores and collective bargaining? Just what is it? When I was a child the local teachers in our public schools had no union.I would NOT trade the education that I received then for what is passing as education today. Retired Catholic (and public) middle school teacher from Cleveland.
Posted by: Manitu | February 20, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I’d like to note that the Egyptians sent pizzas to the protesters in Madison. We are all part of the same struggle for democratic rights, which include the right to collective bargaining.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 20, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
@Lydia
Which party controlled all of Washington the last two years and couldn’t find one crook on all of Wall Street?
See bankers are smart enough to “influence” politicians in both parties. Did you know that?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | February 20, 2011, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
How can Obama possibly tell the difference between a governor attacking the unions or just trying to find ways to keep his state afloat? This POTUS is king of all the political hacks – whatever happened to statesmanship?
Posted by: temagami | February 20, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
I just saw the news that Columbia University sudents heckled a wounded Iraqi war vet who was to speak on campus. Do you want these lowlifes teaching your kids? Actually, I’m a little surprised that these students weren’t in Madison.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 20, 2011, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
As Abe Sauer points out 94 percent of Madison’s high school students graduate, compared to the 70 percent national average. On top of that Forbes has recognized Madison as the second education city in the United States.
What’s more 2 weeks ago the Wisconsin Education Association Council announced its support for merit-based pay reform and measures that would streamline the firing of under-performers.
Yet Walker declares war. As always with right wing ideaologues, its war over diplomacy.
Posted by: Alyson | February 20, 2011, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
make that second BEST city in which to educate a child… impressive, right?
And on another note, “Before the emergence of public unions, public employees were compensated significantly less than people in the private sector. The reason? Much of the private sector work force was unionized. What changed is not the public employees got a better deal, but that the private sector became deunionized, lost the right to bargain collectively, and saw their compensation and benefits stagnate or fall. …What’s really happened is that people who can’t bargain collectively have been screwed for so long that all of a sudden they looked around and realized someone else was getting a better deal. Now it’s time to make sure the teachers are screwed as bad…”
Posted by: Alyson | February 20, 2011, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
From reading the stats on what Wisconsin teachers are being paid, the give-backs they’ve already given up previously, their good track record with student’s results, their pledge to okay easier dismissal of bad teachers(rare for teachers unions), as well as their willingness to give up more to help the budget deficit, it is clear the problem doesn’t lie with them but with a dictatorial governor.
And that was before I read how the governor engineered the shortfall by passing tax breaks for $140 million a few weeks ago, which has created this shortfall.
Beware the union busters, for they will destroy the middle class!
Foghorn Leghorn, you could also add that bankers are ‘dumb’ enough to game the system to benefit their profits but at the price of tanking the entire system and almost collapsing the world’s economy. There is no stronger proof for the importance of government regulation than the greed of the banking industry.
Posted by: Lydia | February 20, 2011, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
I think the low ACT scores for the states without teacher unions is a direct effect of low wages for teachers. Who would want to spend 4 or more years in college to earn a low wage? So the quality of teachers will be lower in those state. I’ve seen the same thing happen in my area in religious schools. They don’t have unions, pay very low wages and attract unqualified people who can’t find jobs in public schools. My son attended one year in 7th grade, the parent-teacher conferences were an eye-opener. For example his English teacher met me in her classroom which was strewn with assignments & papers, at least fifty. When I asked what was going on, she said the students threw them on the floor and she couldn’t get them to pick them up!
This same teacher is now principal of that school!
You get what you pay for.
Posted by: Lydia | February 20, 2011, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Calling in sick when you are not sick is “LYING.” Do Wisconsin parents really want these lowlifes teaching their kids?
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 21, 2011, 5:29 am 5:29 am
Tom Barnow, how you can equate protesting injustice in a way that won’t get you fired, with being a low-life is beyond me.
Posted by: Lydia | February 21, 2011, 10:28 am 10:28 am
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 48% of Likely U.S. Voters agree more with the Republican governor in his dispute with union workers. Thirty-eight percent (38%) agree more with the unionized public employees, while 14% are undecided.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 21, 2011, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
If it’s so “reckless” to shut down the government, why have Wisconsin legislators, the President and the DNC all supported the government shutdown in Wisconsin?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 21, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
are the taxpayers footing the bill for these missing democrats staying at these quality hotels, food and drink bills??
Posted by: firedup49 | February 21, 2011, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Anyone should be able to see that this governor of Wisconsin created the budget shortfall there when he signed a $140 million tax break for corporations a few weeks ago. Now the state is short $137 million. How is that okay? Those teachers he wants that money from are simple middle-class, a 5% paycut is a lot to take.
But the real evil is the governor wanting to end collective bargaining rights. That will lead to a very weak education system in that state, now ranked one of the best. The 4 states without collective bargaining have very low salaries & have the lowest test scores for their students. Why would anyone go to college for over 4 years to have a low paying job as a career?
May the protestors have strength to continue the fight on behalf of teachers, firemen, police and other state workers everywhere. This is class warfare against the middle class.
Posted by: Lydia | February 21, 2011, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Lydia – hate to break the news to you but in Nov legions of so called “middle class Americans” or as many libs call, average Americans-whatever that means,sent a clear message that this country can no longer afford the sweetheart deals union and politicians have placed upon the backs the American people. Gov Walker is doing the job that he promised he would do. He is a true statesman unlike all the political hack parasites in the liberal camp.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 21, 2011, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Why do these politicians keep pulling for MERIT based pay? Is that so they can reward their friends and the brown nosers? Isn’t that what this is all about. People wake up, you are losing RIGHTS! If you can’t see that, you need your teachers, desperately.
Posted by: Carol Allie | February 21, 2011, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
We have the same mess in Ohio. First, the Gov. wants to remove our union rights, and next he wants to do away with anyones overtime pay. This seems to be a movement headed by the wealthy in this country. This is not, only, in one or two states.
Posted by: Carol Allie | February 21, 2011, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Unlike union workers, who all pay taxes, two-thirds of corporations in Wisconsin pay no taxes.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 21, 2011, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
“Unlike union workers, who all pay taxes, two-thirds of corporations in Wisconsin pay no taxes.”
And their customers don’t have to pay higher prices to make up for those higher taxes. See how that works?
Posted by: Jose | February 22, 2011, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Flash Override wrote:
“Unlike union workers, who all pay taxes”
The lower 45% of American wage earners pay ZERO income taxes.
Since these union members must be in the upper brackets, how come they cant pay 6% of their health care insurance premiums like the Governor asks them to?
Most Americans with employer provided insurance still end up paying anywhere between 15-30% of their health care insurance premium each month.
Why should these union members who you admit have good incomes then pay ZERO for their health care?
Obama said of America’s future:
“Everyone must sacrifice for the greater good… Everyone must have some skin in the game.”
Why aren’t these unionites listening to the President?
Posted by: Joe White | February 22, 2011, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Attention Tea Partyers followers: Koch Industries is funding your idealisms. Governor Walker is bought and sold by Koch. Therefore, the government of Wisconsin is saying, “we will not bargain with you.” I thought your party wanted nothing to do with government? Are you aware that Koch industries does not want you to make the wages you make now. Why?…because removing bargaining rights from unions effects all workers. We are a union/non-union based economy and anything effecting wage standards will effect you as well. Listen closely, labor produces all wealth. (please don’t take the word labor out of context)Do you make as much as the wealthy? Do you think they will share the wealth with you? Think again. Union Member.
Posted by: Just like you dummy. | February 23, 2011, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
I cant believe in these times , there are still people so misinformed that they would still be taking the side of big business over theyre fellow Americans. unreal.Its crazy.
Posted by: paul | February 25, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am
//”Since these union members must be in the upper brackets, how come they cant pay 6% of their health care insurance premiums like the Governor asks them to?”//
Actually they HAVE tried to make a compromise with the Governor, agreeing to increased health care and the other stuff, but refusing to give up their collective bargaining rights. He ignored them, he won’t compromise, and you would know that if you had bothered to read any one of 100 articles that have been written on this protest in the last 2 weeks.
Posted by: Mike Wells | February 28, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm