Mar 1, 2011 3:40pm

GAO: Duplication, Waste Costs Taxpayers Billions Each Year, Coburn Says Report Makes Congress Look Like ‘Jackasses’

ABC's Matthew Jaffe reports:

Original Post at 8:21pm, Feb. 28th:

With Congress currently embroiled in a contentious spending fight, a Congressional watchdog has found that a staggering level of duplication is plaguing the bloated federal budget – and chewing up billions of dollars in funding every year.

In a new report obtained by ABC News, the Government Accountability Office determined that “reducing or eliminating duplication, overlap, or fragmentation could potentially save billions of taxpayer dollars annually and help agencies provide more efficient and effective services.”

For instance, the GAO found, the Department of Defense could save up to $460 million every year by undertaking a “broader restructuring” of its military health care system.

The cost of such programs with duplicative and overlapping purposes is eye-opening. The military came in for special scrutiny: over $10 billion on defense-wide business systems every year; $49 billion in military and veterans health services; and at least $76 billion since 2005 in urgent processing systems for the military.

But the military is by no means alone. $58 billion at the Department of Transportation for over 100 separate surface transportation programs. And almost $1 trillion in government-wide tax expenditures listed by the Treasury Department, some of which the GAO found “may be ineffective at achieving their social or economic purposes.”

“Considering the amount of program dollars involved in the issues we have identified, even limited adjustments could result in significant savings,” the GAO said.

The GAO was forced to conduct the report on the behest of Sen. Tom Coburn, R-OK., who pushed a Senate vote in January 2010 to direct the GAO to assess duplication in the budget.

The report, Coburn told reporters at the Capitol Monday evening, will “make us all look like jackasses.”

According to the GAO, not only has Congress been busy spending money on duplicative efforts, but the government has neglected to investigate numerous programs, making the expenditure of some funds not only redundant but wasteful.

For instance, only five of 47 job training and employment programs surveyed by the GAO had been studied to evaluate whether outcomes were the result of the program itself or another cause altogether.

“Little is known about the effectiveness of most programs,” the watchdog observed.

That point also applies to domestic food assistance, where “little is known about the effectiveness of [11 of the 18 programs] because they have not been well studied,” the GAO said.

In fiscal year 2008, for example, the government spent $62.5 billion on those 18 programs.

Ultimately, it all makes the $4 billion in cuts included in the latest two-week spending proposal seem paltry in comparison.

Update at 3:40pm ET, March 1:

Republicans in Congress are pouncing all over this report today as evidence that Democrats should not be fighting against spending cuts, but supporting them.

“None of us would run our families this way. None of us would run our businesses this way,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-OK. “And there is tremendous potential for us to still take care of those that require a safety net by eliminating duplication and the dollars that we’re spending that we don’t get anything in return for.”

The Senate’s top Republican Mitch McConnell went even further, denouncing the report as a sign of “virtual incompetence” in the federal government.

Across the aisle, Senate Democrats were predictably more restrained in their comments.

“I think there are duplicative programs we’ve got around here that we can eliminate,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who applauded Coburn for insisting on the GAO report.

 One interesting tidbit from the report: at a time when the national debt has soared over the $14 trillion mark, the government has 20 different agencies – housing 56 different programs – all working on the same thing… improving financial literacy.

User Comments

Congress didn’t need the “report” to look like “JackAsses” “We The People” already KNEW THAT!
What the report DID DO – is FINALLY publish all the WASTED TaxPayer’s dollars – due to Congress creating UN-NEEDED and DUPLICATE Departments to keep “Friends & Family” employed!
Instead of cutting the OverTime dollars of the Border Patrol – GET RID OF THE WASTE!!!!
Time to “Clean House” and do things SENSIBLY which is what the American People are LOOKING FOR TO HAPPEN!

Posted by: DPW | February 28, 2011, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Baiscally that’s what happens when employees don’t have to generate the money they spend. They simply just don’t care! That kind of behavior would never work at a real business.

Posted by: Bob z | March 1, 2011, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Does this actually surprise anyone?

Posted by: LongT | March 1, 2011, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Now you wonder why the Tea Party?

Posted by: jamescbuilder | March 1, 2011, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Now if we could just get the politicians to act on this, instead of them just cutting programs that are favorites of the “other” party. I’m thinking of the Republicans’ reluctance to cut any part of the defense budget here.

Posted by: Steve From NH | March 1, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Coburn came close to the truth. Rather than just looking like JA’s, maybe the truth is, they are JA’s.
In the first place, they complicate bills so much with earmarks and pork, that no one really knows what has been passed.
One of the things that needs to be changed, is that no bill should have ANY unrelated items attached to it, whatsoever.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 1, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Let’s see what reaction we get from our government. Almost every area in government has a fraud, waste and abuse office. Maybe now we can actually get them to do their job.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 1, 2011, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Get to cutting boys and girls. It’s about time. And while we’re at it, why don’t we stick an “effectiveness metric” provision into new and existing spending that requires some sort of evaluation process to determine if the program actually does what it’s supposed to do?
How about we measure our progress for a change eh?

Posted by: The Unreal | March 1, 2011, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Government should be more efficient and responsive. Good. That looks suspiciously like a rare point of agreement.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | March 1, 2011, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I believe we’ve found our common ground. Everyone appears to be in agreement that the Congress are jackasses and that government waste needs to be addressed. Finally! Let’s keep the pressure on to Defrag the budget and make sure the jackasses don’t cut funding for the GAO.

Posted by: realitycheck0057 | March 1, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

If those in congress would take a good hard look at this report and cut the programs that are not needed or are a waste of money, billions could be cut from the budget instead of attacking the poor and middle class, women and children the old or the sick. This is the way we should go in our fight to reduce the deficit not the way Republicans/Tea party want to do it, probably bad for big business.

Posted by: realnard1 | March 1, 2011, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

It’s what they do best except perhaps, padding their nests.

Posted by: LongT | March 1, 2011, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The Federal Government is out of control and this article proves it.
If anything comes of the Tea Party movement, duplication of oversight is absolutely necessary.
Every single member of Congress should be appalled at this report.
Why we haven’t seen this on every news outlet is beyond comprehension.

Posted by: InYaFace | March 5, 2011, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.