Kucinich Says President Obama Needs Congressional Authorization for Libya No-Fly Zone
ABC News’ John R. Parkinson reports:
Rep. Dennis Kucinich is calling for the recessed Congress to come back into session after President Obama announced that the United States will support a United Nations-approved no-fly-zone over Libya.
Kucinich, an outspoken opponent to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, said in a statement that the president does not have the Constitutional power to unilaterally declare war and called on House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to immediately call the Congress back into session “to decide whether or not to authorize the United States’ participation in a military strike.”
“While the action is billed as protecting the civilians of Libya, a no-fly-zone begins with an attack on the air defenses of Libya and Qaddafi forces. It is an act of war. The president made statements which attempt to minimize U.S. action, but U.S. planes may drop U.S. bombs and U.S. missiles may be involved in striking another sovereign nation. War from the air is still war,” Kucinich, D-Ohio, wrote in a letter to Congressional leaders Friday afternoon. “Whether the U.S. takes military action is not for the UN alone to decide. There is a constitutional imperative in the United States with respect to deciding to commit our U.S. armed forces to war.”
“Both houses of Congress must weigh in,” he added. “This is not for the President alone, or for a few high ranking Members of Congress to decide.”
But the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Michigan, told ABC News Friday afternoon that he did not believe Congressional authorization is necessary for U.S. involvement, and credited the president for opening up a White House national security briefing today to Congressional leaders from both parties.
“I don’t think he needs it,” Rogers said. “I think that he was smart to bring up members of Congress – both parties, put us in the Situation room, and talk about what he’s planning to do, to try to build Congressional support; I think that was the right decision. We do have to be in this together, there’s a lot going on in the world, the United States is in a lot of places right now, we need to do this together if we’re going to do it at all.”
Earlier Friday afternoon, President Obama issued an ultimatum to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi to immediately implement a ceasefire in all parts of Libya and allow international humanitarian assistance or risk military action against his regime.
"These terms are not subject to negotiation," President Obama said from the East Room of the White House Friday. "If Gadhafi does not comply with the resolution, the international community will impose consequences and the resolution will be enforced through military action."
Email
Is Congress Sounding Dumber?
Sonia Sotomayor Speaks to NYU Graduates
First off, this is not a unilateral action by the President of the USA. The Libyans have been begging for the world’s help for weeks and several countries have responded.
Even if this were not the case, we want Congress to decide? They can’t decide which light bulb we should use!
They will all have to race to find their lobbyists to discover just what their view on this is, then they can argue about it, Republicans claiming it’s a job-killing idea foisted upon us by that Obama-loving media, while Dems can blame big business & the Governor of Wisconsin. Of course, Sarah Palin will spout some nonsense & we can now look forward to Donald Trump dropping a few pearls of wisdom as well!
Then, sometime in, oh, say 2014, Congress may, just maybe, come to some half-assed conclusion. Then they can get back to arguing about healthcare & raising their own pay. Fiddling while America burns!
Yeah, REAL good idea!
Posted by: Calvin White | March 18, 2011, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
He might be loony. But he is correct. We have WAY too many undeclared “wars”, “police actions”, etc. By Bush, Obama, etc. The Constitution, and Founders, were quite clear in their intent. And couldn’t we use those troops to help quell the near war conditions in a country south of us? Or at least seal the border? That, seems to me, to me to be the most basic reason for the military. To DEFEND the country.
Posted by: Ed | March 18, 2011, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
That has never stopped any President from doing whatever he wanted.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 19, 2011, 9:37 am 9:37 am
The constitution is dead….Obama hasn’t been following our laws for a long time. In fact, he openly spits on it……..just look at what Holder has been up to. Laws aren’t to be enforced against “his people.” Like any dictatorship, our dictator and his crew pick and chose which and when to apply laws that they don’t care for.
Posted by: boomthereitis | March 19, 2011, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Kucinich is correct. Read the Constitution… It’s pretty clear. I think the Tea Party ought to weigh in on this. Guys???
Posted by: Les Patlove | March 19, 2011, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Kucinich is damn wrong. Every one has a moral responsiblity of safegaring the lost of innocent life by whatever means available in his or her capacity. President Obama is exactly doing that.
Posted by: Amin | March 19, 2011, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Demo Truman went to war in Korea. He
had no intention of winning. It was
all a waste of lives and money. Same here?
Posted by: Jack Kinch(1uncle) | March 19, 2011, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm