Mar 10, 2011 4:22pm

Rand Paul’s Toilet Tirade

ABC News’ Matthew Jaffe reports:

Members of Congress are upset about a lot of things – the economy, the debt… the toilets?

Sen. Rand Paul, R-KY, today went off on a tirade about toilets in the midst of an Energy & Natural Resources Committee hearing on energy efficiency standards for certain appliances.

His unwitting victim was Kathleen Hogan, the deputy assistant secretary for energy efficiency at the Department of Energy.

“You’re really anti-choice on every other consumer item that you’ve listed here, including light bulbs, refrigerators, toilets – you name it, you can’t go around your house without being told what to buy. You restrict my choices, you don’t care about my choices,” Paul said to her. “You don’t care about the consumer frankly. You raise the cost of all the items with your rules, all your notions that you know what’s best for me.”

“Frankly, my toilets don’t work in my house. And I blame you and people like you who want to tell me what I can install in my house, what I can do. You restrict my choices. There is hypocrisy that goes on when people claim to believe in some choices but don’t want to let the consumer decide what they can buy and put in their houses. I find it insulting. I find it insulting that a lot of these products that you’re going to make us buy and you won’t let us buy what we want to buy and you take away our choices.”

Paul’s office uploaded a clip of the exchange to his SenatorRandPaul Youtube Channel.

“These things you want us to buy are often made in foreign countries. You ship jobs overseas. The same thing your administration claims to be in favor of, you’re shipping jobs overseas by saying we can’t make these items over here. I find it really an affront to the sensibility of the idea and notion of the free marketplace, of capitalism, of freedom of choice. Now it’s not that I’m against conservation. I’m all for energy conservation. But I wish you would come here to extol me, to cajole me, to encourage, to try to convince me to conserve energy. But you come instead with fines, threats of jail, you put people out of business who want to make products you don’t like.”

“This is what your energy efficiency standards are. Call it what it is. You prevent people from making things that consumers want. I find it really appalling and hypocritical and think there should be some self-examination from the administration on the idea that you favor a woman’s right to an abortion, but you don’t favor a woman or a man’s right to choose what kind of light-bulb, what kind of dishwasher, what kind of washing machine. I really find it troubling – this busy-body nature that you want to come into my house, my bathroom, my bedroom, my kitchen, my laundry room. I just really find it insulting and I find that all of the arguments for energy efficiency – you’re exactly right we should conserve energy, but why not do it in a voluntary way? Why do it where you threaten to fine me or put me in jail if I don’t accept your opinion? In America we believe in trying to convince our neighbors, but not trying to convince them through the force of law. I find this antithetical to the American way.”

“I have a couple responses to that,” replied Hogan once Paul had concluded his rant. “One, I think the appliance standards program is a great partnership between the Congress and the administration over many years. So much of what we are implementing had its genesis in bipartisan bills that we put forth at a number of different points over the history of this country for the last 30 to 40 years.”

“But you restrict our choices, right?” asked Paul.

“I really do not believe the appliance standards end up restricting personal choice,” Hogan said.

“I can’t buy the old light bulbs. That restricts my choice on buying.”

“My view is what you want is lighting, right?” Hogan said.

“I can’t buy a toilet that works,” he replied.

“I can help you find a toilet that works,” she offered.

“Are you going to pay for it?” quipped Paul. “Everything costs more, to go back and retrofit the toilets that don’t work that no bureaucrat understood or flushed before they made us use them, will cost us money. It will cost us thousands of dollars to go back and add some kind of jet stream to the toilets. And we don’t even save money. You flush them 10 times and they don’t work. But the thing is you busybodies always want to do something to tell us how to live our lives better. Keep it to yourselves. Try to convince us with persuasion, but don’t threaten to put us in jail or put us out of business if we don’t accept your way of thinking.”

When Paul finally paused, Hogan smiled, and then another senator asked if he should go ahead with his own comments or let Paul continue.

“I was just kind of enjoying it,” Paul said. “I’ve been waiting for 20 years to talk about how bad these toilets are and this was a good excuse today.”

User Comments

I don’t blame Rand. I thought I needed a new dishwasher, until I found out the EPA legislated removing phosphates from dishwasher liquid. Curse you nannies. Now I wash all dishes by hand.

Posted by: sybilll | March 10, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

He is right. Our choices are getting more restricted every day, and every day, we are being forced to buy more and more imports, rather than American made products.
Glad to see someone is raising the flag about what is going on.
The consumer should have the right to choose, what is best for them, and not have government dictating to us.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 10, 2011, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Finally! It’s about time someone addressed these feel-good energy regulations that end up doing more harm than good. Like the cash for junkers program. Sure, mpg probably went up, but at the cost of demolishing plenty of working cars. And you have to take into account the environmental impact of building a new car to replace the old one. But no one cared about that, since the mpg improvement looked so good on paper.

Posted by: Jonah Mercer | March 10, 2011, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

God Bless Rand Paul for speaking up for us. I agree 100%.

Posted by: wvsusan | March 10, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

And when our streams and rivers are poluted from deregulation,and there’s a shortage of water and we are recycling sewage for drinking water, Rand can have the first glass.

Posted by: catsrboss | March 10, 2011, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

So this is what it’s like to have a Senator that actually represents the American peoples best interest…

Posted by: Charlie | March 10, 2011, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

This is a joke. People do not choose more fuel efficient cars, CAFE standards forced the auto industry to produce more efficient cares. People do not choose flouride in our drinking water, the govt provides it and the result is fewer cavities. People do not choose to conserve energy in numbers large enough. Quit moaning. A light bulb is a light bulb. A toilet is a toilet. Deal with it.

Posted by: jack | March 10, 2011, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Rand Paul’s had toilet trouble for 20 years? Maybe the problem is he’s lazy and cheap when it comes to plumbing problems. Maybe he shouldn’t have hired Joe “The Non-licensed” Plumber to fix his toilet.

Posted by: Frank Tien | March 10, 2011, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Wow. There are many, many strange things in Rand Paul’s rant (yes, Rand, we actually do think a woman’s right to choose what happens to her body is more sacred than her right to decide the water level in her toilet,) but I’m particularly stuck on this idea that simple environmental regulations force him to buy imports. Does he think American engineers just can’t crack the low-flow toilet secret, or something?

Posted by: Ian | March 10, 2011, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

He’s right you know.

Posted by: Brandon | March 10, 2011, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Libertarians keep getting more amusing. Always ranting about something or other. “This is America, I can crap where i want!” Yeah, like in Rand Paul’s front yard.

Posted by: james | March 10, 2011, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

A Senator knows more about toliets then medican or government. What few bother to realize is Aqua Buddha pot smoking Senator Rand Paul is working for the Coal Company not the people. He was paid to get those miners back to with even without the companies repairing the safety or even paying the billions in fines due. This is about the dumbest Senator in office. Wing nuts do have followers and Rand Paul is an embarrassment to his Father and now the country. He should be on SNL with his fellow nutter Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Jackie | March 10, 2011, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

he is so correct.i have a client who just was sued and paid 20,000 for ada ramps to a storage facility for home goods.first of all if your own handicapped are going to load your storage container? no and the original plans and building permits were handed out years ago by a city govt.
liberals cant seem to deal with common sense very well and we have let them hijack our society. we all want clean air and water but the left has lost touch with reality. obama seems to actually enjoy $5 a gallon gas.hows that global warming thing?

Posted by: catman | March 10, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

many cities have rebate programs for getting these new toliets. I’m pretty certain it is a scam or kickback somewhere. Nothing is “free”. Somebody, foreign manufacturers, plumbers, etc is making money off of the deal or somehow we are paying for it (taxes, increased water costs, etc.) If the price of water reflected actual costs then people would be forced to improvise, pay more, or buy a low-flush toliet. Simple.

Posted by: Ed | March 10, 2011, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

What a fruitcake.

Posted by: realitycheck0057 | March 10, 2011, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Libertarians are a hoot. They appear to have ZERO cooperative skills and even less empathy. It’s all about ME! Who cares if MY high water usage forces a farmer to have less or an aquifer to go dry? It’s the invisible hand of the Free Market!

Posted by: green.goddess | March 10, 2011, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Obama is moving closer to re-election with fruitcakes like Paul, Gingrich, Sarah, and Huckabee. Thanks, right wing – Obama’s re-election is going to be a cake walk with all of these right wing nuts ranting away.HA!!

Posted by: martin | March 10, 2011, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

How about those 1 gal/flush toilets that need to be flushed 3 times. Yeah, the congress is real smart.

Posted by: LongT | March 10, 2011, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

“Obama’s re-election is going to be a cake walk with all of these right wing nuts ranting away.” Yeah, that’s what the left was saying last fall. LOL!

Posted by: LongT | March 10, 2011, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

LOL…LOL…What a bunch of “ignorant clowns” got elected by the far right last fall. And evidently a bunch of “clowns” who are resistant to change…even when it has been proven best for our environment. Senator…it is not about the “subjectivity of your RIGHTS”…it is about the “livability of our world…our environment”. Rand…you have no business being where you are at if you are that “backwards and ignorant”.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 10, 2011, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

HAHA!! ITS SO TRUE!!! -and a great example of sticking with a bad idea, rule or law.. long after it’s been proven not to work!

Posted by: cindy | March 10, 2011, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Its all true. The light bulbs are dangerous. Thet are not to be thrown in the trash because of the mercury inside. Where the hell do you take these little critters. Drive to the dump to put in hazard area. 20 miles from my house. All made in China. That will put more american workers out of work. We made a mistake and bought a low flush toilet when they first came out. The flush barely moved the water. We bought a used one to replace the one we dumped. They redesigned the toilets and they are better,but,not as good as the old ones.

Posted by: Martia | March 10, 2011, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

…and Rand Paul want to tell women what they can and can not do with their own bodies!…..You are funny Mr. Paul!

Posted by: Kenneth the VI of Minneapolis | March 10, 2011, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

It was a change to the tile adhesive (for enviromental reasons) contributed to space shuttle Columbia disaster.

Posted by: Voice_Reason | March 10, 2011, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Good for him. The whole global warming/save the planet bull is a farce and anyone with half a brain knows it. That or anyone who reads and doesn’t just listen to what the media tells them knows it. If you want to blow off the control government has on your personal decisions you’re an ignorant yes man that should pay more attention. Good for Rand Paul. We’ve used the same light bulbs for decades and suddenly they are bad and we have to pay 4x’s as much. Follow the trail to who runs all these save the planet product producing companies folks.

Posted by: cloudwatcher | March 10, 2011, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

That was hardcore. I miss the old toilets too.

Posted by: lg | March 10, 2011, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

when did Rand Paul ever take his head out of the toilet ?

Posted by: spacepuppie | March 10, 2011, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Peter King can show Rand Paul what happens when you drink toiletwater ..with a side of phosphates

Posted by: spacepuppy | March 11, 2011, 12:04 am 12:04 am

What a joke! He can’t find a toilet that works? I’ve never had a problem with the toilets in my house which I’ve lived in for nearly 20 years. New ones, old ones, they are just toilets. How can they not work? What kind of fool can’t figure out how to get his toilets to work? He blames the government on his stupidity? This tirade is a joke. He was on The Daily Show the other day and his arguments were total crap, only really saying that he needed to keep his constituents happy by mining more and more coal. What a family!

Posted by: tag | March 11, 2011, 8:31 am 8:31 am

It takes 1200 gallons of water to create 1 lbs. of beef to eat. Penny wise and pound foolish people always want to look like they are changing but never really change in a way that will have a significant effect. How about this….convince everyone to eat a little less meat and then we can all take half hour showers and have toilets that I don’t have to flush 3 times to work. How about the shower heads that you can never get the soap out of your hair? You use the same amount of water because your in the shower 3x as long .
Dont get me started on the new lightbulbs that contain toxic metals. LED lights are the only choice.

Posted by: Jason Surer | March 11, 2011, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Ah yes, lets go back to wasteful appliances, energy wasting lightbulbs, polluting phosphates and freon!! My house switched to CFL bulbs a few years ago. We have the ones that give off more of a “day” light rather than that sickly yellow hue. We love them and have yet to replace them. Do they cost more? In the short term, yes, but If I don’t replace them in 5 years, I have saved a lot of money. We just got several appliances – none made in US. Is that due to Regulation? NO! It was due to greed – the manufacturer gets higher profit by making it in overseas! DUH!

Posted by: kay | March 11, 2011, 8:45 am 8:45 am

“I really find it troubling – this busy-body nature that you want to come into my house, my bathroom, my bedroom,” BUT the Republicans are the ones who are against abortion and gay rights [bedroom], against funding for birth control and against sex education to help prevent unwed pregnancy. When they get out of OUR bedroom, we will get out of theirs!! :)

Posted by: kay | March 11, 2011, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Notice how the “writer” refers to Paul’s measured and good-natured comments as a “tirade”.
Standard practice for the Dem Stream Media to push the lie that all conservatives are “angry”, and therefore irrational.
Pathetic partisan tactics from so-called journalists.

Posted by: Tony 77 | March 11, 2011, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Re: “This is America, I can crap where I want!” Funnily enough, this is actually the case in India, whose citizens own more cell phones than toilets.

Posted by: DavidF | March 11, 2011, 10:37 am 10:37 am

So cnd fox,ed, etc like to be told what to do. Baa Baaa

Posted by: JamesJ | March 11, 2011, 10:47 am 10:47 am

The way the government does business, as Hogan, is just traditional. It’s kind of the way they are used to thinking or doing things. Rand Paul is right to question it. Sometimes you have to rethink, why are we doing it this way, is it the best way, or just the way we’ve grown accustomed.
The pure libertarian argument is that as water supplies shrink, the cost will raise, as the cost goes up, the consumer will seek out low-flow toilets on their own, to save money.
Which would work, the trouble is, it works too late.
But, there are ways to tweak that process, and ultimately leave it as a consumer choice, and not have it work too late. Artificially reserve part of the water supply, to increase water costs of the remaining consumable water, earlier.
The problem with toilets is they flush drinking water.
That’s the problem, the solution is – collect rain water, and flush water that is not drinking water.
You can then use 5 gallons if you want, frankly it doesn’t matter….if its rain water.
Water, itself does not poison the environment, I assure you of that. And none of these regulations address the amount of the other thing that you are flushing.

Posted by: Robert | March 11, 2011, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Wake up everybody! Do you think that we can continue to ignore the fact that our supply of clean air, energy and water are endangered right now?
Many of your misinformed comments illustrate the dangerous narcissism of the new American way–I got mine!
Meanwhile, the rest of you (except MY precious wife and children) can go drink from a puddle somewhere as long as WE don’t have to see it. While you’re at it, please get sick and die so WE can profit from your loss of whatever benefits you are entitled to and simultaneously maximize the gene pool.
It’s survival of the financially fittest out there–a particularly insipid form of reverse Darwinism.

Posted by: Theodore Wirth | March 11, 2011, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Maybe if Rand Paul can’t flush his toilet, he should restrict his choices of what he eats. Choose fiber next time, Senator.

Posted by: athena | March 11, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

“waht a fruitcake” – you are right – Hogan is

Posted by: jamescbuilder | March 11, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Targetted product restrictions are a means to address the true environmental cost of inefficiency because the people are really bad about comparing short term costs (the cost of a toilet or a light bulb) with long term costs (water and energy bills). Yes, it does disrupt things in the short run (poor performing toilets, so-so cfl bulbs), but in the long run, it encourages innovation. American companies have every opportunity to take part in that innovation (and frequently do). Modern water use-compliant toilets work fine and have improved considerably since the whole three flushes to get it down ones.

Posted by: jg | March 11, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Government energy regulations don’t force people to buy foreign imports. Chinese minimum wage of 68 cents an hours forces people to buy foreign imports. Americans can not compete Imagine working an 8 hour day and barely having enough for a meal at McDonalds. We buy foreign imports because they are cheap and cheaper than we could ever produce them at.

Posted by: J McD | March 11, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

I will be the first to admit the lightbulbs and toilets annoy me. But I also grasp my children and grandchildren deserve an ounce of respect, and it’s just not loving to think we can live in excess waste with no regards to what we are leaving for our children. We know these resources are going to run out at some point.

Posted by: secondlook | March 11, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

The really funny thing is that behind all his insanity he did have some sort of a point. It wasn’t, “Let’s use up all the clean water flushing the toilet (maybe he eats too much bran). THe problem is we still need to conserve resources for everyone. And of course a woman can’t make choices because some how that doesn’t count.

Posted by: Sherry | March 11, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

In point of fact, low-flow toilets actually SAVE money for everybody, even if you don’t have one in your house. In a growing population like ours, less waste water means building additional sewage treatment plants can be put off longer. Thus, taxes for those plants don’t have to be imposed.
And it isn’t as if people are forced to replace their old toilets; rather, new construction has to have them. And in truth, the new ones typically work better than the old ones.

Posted by: Jason | March 11, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

yup

Posted by: jjcoolfosho | March 11, 2011, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Thank God for Rand Paul. Someone who will stand up to Washington’s continuing idiocy.

Posted by: Sam | March 11, 2011, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Sounds like the rant of a selfish 4 year old. Proof that our government truly represents the voters, because that is exactly the demographic that sent him to DC. I’ve a water saving toilet for 20 years and no problems. I can only assume those who complain are really full of excrement.

Posted by: DJ | March 11, 2011, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Mr. Paul should consider buying a water efficient toilet from Kohler. I got a couple in compliance with new toilet regulations in my state. These great U.S. made toilets work perfectly, and I am already seeing substantial water savings. Get with the program and be a water conservative instead of sitting in the pockets of corporate lobbyists.

Posted by: Thinks2010 | March 12, 2011, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Maybe its Texas, Mr Paul…just had the occasion to replace a couple toilets in a house I was rehabbing and man, who knew there was such a selection? And that was just Lowe’s, who knows what Home Depot or some high style place had?
And yea, they’re low water usage, flush just fine…
do better research on your toilets next time, hmmm?

Posted by: b r wilde | March 12, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Yeah, talk about freedom of choice whatever happened to private enterprise? Are monopolies the new private enterprise? Whatever happened to that invisible hand of the market that kept them FREE? If Paul wants to rant about something then let him rant about how the free market has become the controlled market; not by government but by Big Business and the politicians it has bought to enslave us, just like Paul.

Posted by: JAM | March 13, 2011, 7:30 am 7:30 am

In other words, “MY toilet doesn’t work so it’s YOUR fault.”
So much for personal responsibility and self-determination. Libertarians are a joke and libertarianism is a farce. If (Ayn) Rand Paul can’t deal with these newfangled machines, why doesn’t he just dig himself an outhouse in the backyard?
Putting up with a crappy toilet for twenty years (pun intended) is HIS choice. Why should his situation force the kinds of choices HE wants on the rest of us?

Posted by: E.A.Blair | March 13, 2011, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Wow. Rand Paul’s father Ron may be an iconoclast, but at least he has coherent principles and a few decent ideas. The son Rand apparently is just a demagogue with no sense of priorities. Or, perhaps, just an idiot.
Can he really claim to be a libertarian if he panders to pro-lifers about abortion in the same sentence that he claims choices of what to *buy* are essential to liberty? Can he really not understand that one of the main *jobs* of government — which is where he works, the role he campaigned for — a job that it’s been doing for generations, is to protect the public interest when market shortcomings fail to do so?
(Overuse of limited resources like water is just one of these areas. You can’t buy tainted meat anymore, either, or hire a 12-year-old to work in your factory… do these things bother him?)
What’s worse are the people on here claiming “he’s right.” No, he’s not. When it comes to toilets, for instance, apparently neither he nor his fans here have taken the trouble to actually visit a store, talk to a plumber, or read an article in Consumer Reports, because their information is laughably wrong.

Posted by: Chris M. | March 14, 2011, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Gee, Rand, I’m so sorry you can’t put asbestos in your house anymore. And I’m so upset that the USDA is trying to keep salmonella out of your grocery purchases so you don’t end up having that in your house either.

Posted by: Esther Williams | March 14, 2011, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Apparently Rand’s never been to Lowes. They have a whole isle dedicated to light bulbs. Energy efficient incandescents, fluorescents in several different wattage’s, even three-ways, daylight, soft white, halogen bulbs. And even another whole isle with several varieties of toilets. Flushings above the bowl around the rim, below the bowl. I just remodeled a bathroom two years ago. Everything from the bulbs to the toilet are energy efficient, and I’ve had no problems at all. What’s the contrived argumant really about Rand? Rallying the base?Seriously, what a waste of tax payers money.

Posted by: catsrboss | March 14, 2011, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Let’s all send him Sydney Smarts!

Posted by: J Dubya | March 16, 2011, 2:41 am 2:41 am

I can’t understand what he is doing wrong. I have a new inexpensive 1.6gal/flush toilet and it works better than the 6gal/flush it replaced. I even installed a cheap dual flush retrofit system on it (1/2 flush for #1, full for #2) I have had zero problems with it. I also haven’t had to replace a lightbulb in years since we switched to CF bulbs. I think advancements in technology are a wonderful thing.

Posted by: jessa | March 22, 2011, 8:13 am 8:13 am

I wish the government would let us drive to the store at any speed we want in a 10mpg car without seatbelts after having drank a few brewskis to buy lead paint and asbestos insulation to fix our leaky homes not built to code that have 10 gallon/flush toilets and refrigerators that use more energy than a small island nation complaining about “global warming” when, in fact, the planet is not warming because it snowed a lot last year and I got a cold and had to go see a “licensed” doctor with a “degree” from a “university” who tells me I’m healthier now that arsenic been removed from my tap water, only my daddy drank arsenic and turned out just fine, thankyouverymuch, and I like its sweet, tangy taste.
Liberals.

Posted by: Trent McJivvers | March 22, 2011, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

I just think it’s interesting that Rand Paul seems to think that light-bulb choices implicate the same sort of personal, privacy, and constitutional rights as abortion choices.

Posted by: Smith | April 13, 2011, 11:55 am 11:55 am

We should have personal choice, but not without some restrictions. There needs to be some sense within people that what we do does have an affect on others and society at large, something most Republicans, especially libertarians, don’t understand. Mankind is destroying this planet all for the sake of convenience. I’ll be surprised if it’s inhabitable in 100 years…

Posted by: Lauren | January 21, 2012, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.