Mar 22, 2011 7:51am

Romney Supports Military Action in Libya, Criticizes President For Decision Making

ABC News' Jonathan Karl reports:

Mitt Romney offered his first words on the military strike on Libya last night — supporting the decision to intervene, but hammering President Obama for the way he made the decision.

 "I support military action in Libya. I support out troops there in the mission they've been given,"  Romney said in an interview on the Hugh Hewitt radio show

 "But let me also note that thus far the President has been unable to construct a foreign policy, any foreign policy," he added. "He calls for the removal of Moammar Kadafi but then conditions our action on the directions we get from the Arab League and the United Nations."

 Here's the full exchange:

What is your reaction to President Obama’s announcement of airstrikes on Libya?

 First, I support military action in Libya. I support our troops there in the mission that they’ve been given.  But let me also note that thus far the President has been unable to construct a foreign policy, any foreign policy. I think it's fair to ask, you know, what is it thatexplains the absence of any discernible foreign policy from the President of the United States? 

I believe that it flows from his fundamental disbelief in American exceptionalism. In the President’s world, all nations have "common interests," the lines between good and evil are blurred, America's history merits apology. And without a compass to guide him in our increasingly turbulent world, he’s tentative, indecisive, timid and nuanced. And as a result, I think, he says for instance he’s committed to success in Afghanistan, unless it means commitment beyond 2011.

He stands with our ally Israel, but condemns it's settlement policy more forcefully than he condemns Hamas rockets. And he calls for the removal of Moammar Kadafi but then conditions our action on the directions we get from the Arab League and United Nations.

User Comments

“So what would you do instead, Mitt?”
“Oh…actually, I was hoping I could sit tight and continue to pander to the right-wing for a year or two.”
I really liked this, though:
“In the President’s world, all nations have ‘common interests,’ the lines between good and evil are blurred, America’s history merits apology.”
Might just be me, but “the President’s world” sounds an awful lot like, uh, the real world.

Posted by: Nick | March 22, 2011, 8:54 am 8:54 am

So… and please correct me if I’m comprehending this incorrectly… Mitt Romney supports the actions in Libya and would like Kadafi (why don’t people just ask the guy how he spells his name?)removed. However he does not support the coalition because the United States is not directing the actions?
Okay… does this mean he would have the USA enter a third war alone? Only to say that we are leading the action?
Comes across as rather juvenile to me…

Posted by: Mytakeonthis61 | March 22, 2011, 11:26 am 11:26 am

What a canned response, pandering to the wingnuts with completely meaningless buzzwords. It sounds like he held a dozen Tea Party focus groups before making this statement.

Posted by: Sam | March 22, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Romney is nothing more than a “flip flopper” who is desperately pandering to the far right extremists. A very good reason for educated and intelligent independents and moderates to support the President in 2012.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 22, 2011, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Waiting for a mildly partisan republican to step up…. barbour is leading towards that concept. Wish it was Mitt. I am jumping off the mitt bandwagon.

Posted by: James | March 23, 2011, 5:23 am 5:23 am

Everyone in the military can see the irrationality of a “humanitarian war.” That’s because they know war kills lots of innocent people whether you are trying to or not. These nutjobs like Obama, Clinton, and their Republican neocon clones on the right would never, ever sign up to go fight these “absolutely necessary” wars — which immediately tells you how necessary these wars are. These wars are necessary only to the bottom lines of the military industrial complex.
Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: conspiracygirl | June 15, 2011, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Mitt, in case you missed it, Obama’s policy not only worked but proved to be the right way to go. I wonder how Iraq would look today had 9/11 happened under Obama’s watch. I doubt we would have ever invaded Iraq and hence, Iran would still be in check. Get back to me Mitt on your new, yet released flip-flop on how this was indeed the right course to take. Poser!

Posted by: Scott Parker | October 20, 2011, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.