Apr 4, 2011 6:10pm

White House Condemns New Israeli Settlements Announced on Eve of Israeli President’s Visit

"The United States is deeply concerned by continuing Israeli actions with respect to settlement construction," said White House National Security Staff spokesman Tommy Vietor.

Not exactly a "Welcome Shimon Peres" card.

But then again — for not the first time of the Obama presidency — a US-Israel meeting featured the overture of an announcement of new Israeli settlement permits, despite continued US opposition to new Israeli settlement activity on disputed territories.

Israeli President Shimon Peres is due to have a working lunch at the White House Tuesday, but as Mr. Vietor notes, the Obama administration is "concerned" about the recent announcement by the Jerusalem District Planning and Construction Committee of approval of 942 housing units on the Southern Slopes of Gilo, in addition to the Israeli government's approval over the weekend of hundreds of apartments in West Bank settlements Gush Etzion, Ma'ale Adumim, Ariel, and Kiryat Sefer, as reported by Ha'aretz.

"Not only are continued Israeli settlements illegitimate, Israel’s actions run counter to efforts to resume direct negotiations," Vietor said.

Elie Isaacson, an adviser to Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, told the New York Times that the timing was coincidence.

“There are no secrets whatsoever,” Isaacson said. “The plan is merely going from one bureaucratic stage to the next bureaucratic stage. The building policy in Jerusalem has been the same for 40 years.”

In February, the US vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning as "illegal" the construction of Israeli settlements in occupied territory, but the matter was debated within the administration.

In March 2010, Vice President Biden was greeted in Israel with the news of the Israeli Interior Ministry approving 1,600 new housing units for Jews in Ramat Shlomo, in East Jerusalem. White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod called it an “affront” and an “insult." 

“What it did was it made more difficult a very difficult process,” Axelrod said, adding that the move “seemed calculated to undermine” the so-called proximity talks going on between the Palestinians and the Israelis.  In an interview with me that same month, Vice President Biden denied that he had told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that settlement activity put the lives of troops at risk.

-Jake Tapper

User Comments

Time to impose a no fly zone over Palestine.

Posted by: Flash Override | April 4, 2011, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

His approval numbers dropping from the 60′s to the mid 40′s because of the scandal was no issue at all I see.

Well, in the aftermath, it was not so bad after all for Regan. Who was the president after Reagan?
Obama is living through his own bad episode, but he choses to handle it differently. Obama did not address the nation from the Oval office. History should remember that detail more harshly, especially considering Obama’s activities prior and following the commencement of war with Libya.

Posted by: Mike, CO | April 5, 2011, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Tony Vietor??? Somebody better laying out bios on all the White House crowd before some one of us starts to believe him/her. Who are these people, and where did they come from??????????????????

Posted by: justj joey | April 5, 2011, 11:11 am 11:11 am

The Israelis should be more than “criticized” for what they are doing with these “settlements”. Want to read and actually “learn’ about what is going on over there? Read Thomas Friedman’s book “From Beirut to Jerusalem”…before you open your mouths. Oh and if your opinion is based on your “myth” of man-made “religious” dogma…don’t bother commenting at all. you are so far from the “reality and truth”…your comments will be useless.

Posted by: CND FOX | April 5, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.