Jun 17, 2011 12:37am

Fear & Loathing In Minneapolis: Progressives Vent Frustration With Obama At Netroots Nation

ABC News’ Matthew Jaffe reports:

The frustrations and the fears that progressives feel about President Obama were on full display Thursday as thousands of them flocked to Minneapolis for the sixth annual Netroots Nation conference. 

Former Wisconsin senator Russ Feingold said he hoped that Obama will be re-elected, but he urged the president to stand up to corporate interests, demanding that the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling become a focal point of the 2012 campaign. 

“Sometimes we have to be very direct with the Democratic Party. Just as you have long pushed our Democrats to stand up for their ideals, I’m here this evening to ask you to redouble your efforts because I fear that the Democratic Party is in danger of losing its identity,” Feingold said in his keynote address to a crowd of around 2,400 progressive activists and bloggers here at the Minneapolis Convention Center, the most ever for the event. 

Specifically, Feingold ripped Priorities USA, a super political action committee started last spring by former White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton.

“I think it’s a mistake for us to take the argument that they like to make that, ‘Well, what we’re going to do now is, we’re going to take the corporate money like the Republicans do and then after we win, we’ll change it.’ When’s the last time anyone did that? Most people don’t change the rules after they win by them. It doesn’t usually happen. It never happens,” Feingold said. “You know what? I think we’ll lose anyway if we do this. We’ll lose our soul when it comes to the issue of corporate domination. People will see us as weak. People will see us as corporate-lite. We’ll gut our message. I think it’s not just wrong, I think it’s a dumb strategy. It’s dumb because people will not believe us if we do this, so I strongly disagree with those who are trying to create these PACs. I know people want to win. I understand that. I like to win, too. And I know that today’s Republican party has found more ways to play dirty, so I empathize with the desire to fight fire with fire, but Democrats should just never be in the business of taking unlimited corporate contributions. It’s dancing with the devil and it’s a game that we will never win.”

“It’s not just campaigns and contributions,” Feingold noted. “We have to say to the president, ‘Mr. President, Jeff Immelt is not the right guy – the CEO of GE is not the right guy to be running your Jobs & Competitiveness Council, not when your company doubled its profits, increased his compensation, and asked its workers to take huge pay and benefits cuts.”

Former DNC chairman Howard Dean also addressed the opening day of the conference, noting that “grousing about the president is a stage we have to go through.” Dean said he will continue to support the president, but rather than focus on Obama, he suggested, people should focus on what they can do in their own communities.

“We are responsible for the change we can believe in,” he said. “Change does not come from Washington, DC. Change comes from the bottom up.” 

“Politicians follow. They don’t lead. We lead, collectively, all of us.”

Others, though, were far more outspoken in their criticism of the Obama administration. Adam Bonin, the chairman of NetRoots who was once a law student of Obama’s at the University of Chicago, tried to explain why progressives are unhappy with the president.

“I think people are frustrated with President Obama. Obviously he came in with a lot of energy and a tremendous amount of support from this community,” Bonin said in an interview with ABC News. “And while a great deal has been accomplished, there are things that just haven’t been done yet on the economy, on judges, on foreign policy, and that frustration is out there.”

One breakout session this afternoon was titled, “What to do when the president is just not that into you?” The session featured Lt. Dan Choi, no stranger to directing ire at the White House for not taking a stronger stance on gay rights. At one point Choi ripped up a flyer from Organizing for America.

On Friday morning White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer will address the conference, while Vice President Biden’s former economic adviser Jared Bernstein will participate in a panel session later in the day. Bonin predicted that some audience members will be “out for blood” with Pfeiffer, while others will just want to hear what he has to say.

“Look, there are some people who are going to be out for blood. There are going to be some people who are just here to listen and learn,” Bonin said. “I don’t think it’s going to be hostile, but they know that this isn’t all hugs and kisses for them now.”

Not about to let progressives have the run of Minneapolis for the next couple of days, Republicans are staging their own conference – RightOnline – starting on Friday. A few Minnesota Republicans who are running for the White House – former governor Tim Pawlenty and Rep. Michele Bachmann – will speak to the RightOnline gathering on Saturday.

 

User Comments

Its not fear and loathing. Its anger at betrayal. Obama can expect my 2012 vote for him when a well known hot spot freezes over.

Posted by: jan | June 17, 2011, 5:31 am 5:31 am

I love the smell of cognitive dissonance in the morning.

Posted by: West | June 17, 2011, 5:32 am 5:32 am

I love the smell of Liberals eating Liberals in the morning. It smells like victory!

Posted by: TTTCOTTH | June 17, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am

They sound like tea-partiers.
“we’re going to take the corporate money like the do and then after we win, we’ll change it.’ When’s the last time anyone did that?”
But it is the democrat who refuses to ban political donations from all but Citizens.
And quite frankly, Union money is as tainted as Corporate money.
Join the 2nd American Revolution in 2012. Re-elect no one.

Posted by: Denver | June 17, 2011, 10:36 am 10:36 am

“Change does not come from Washington, DC. Change comes from the bottom up.” — Howard Dean
***
The irony of that comment is breathtaking. If Gov. Dean and other liberals truly believed that, they wouldn’t be liberals.

Posted by: Scott | June 17, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Obmama was the first presidential candidate to refuse to submit to campaign finance restrictions. His campaign financing was secretive, and evidently dirty and corrupt. The notion that he is in any way interested in campaign finance “reform”, except as a tactic, is laughable. His policy on this, as on everything else, is “rules for thee, but not for me”.

Posted by: hp | June 17, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Welcome to the club. I have feared and loathed Obama since 2007.

Posted by: Diggs | June 17, 2011, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Obama has spent us into oblivion, micromanaged every aspect of the economy to the point it has completely ground to a halt and used executive fiat to punish his enemies and reward his friends. This is in addition to effectively nationalizing large swaths of the economy. What more do they want him to do? What new species of failure do they want him to breed and unleash upon the unsuspecting populace that has already suffered all of these predations?

Posted by: Ben | June 17, 2011, 11:40 am 11:40 am

The theme here in the comments seems to be “cut off my nose to spite my face”.
Stop concentrating on Obama, and start making noise about what you want.
The power really is in Congress; THERE is where you must make changes.
When Obama has a progressive Congress, he can push the changes to campaign finance laws, House and Senate rules, etc. that now allow time-and-taxpayer-money-wasting obfuscation now, and all the problems that Jane Hamsher and others keep ranting about might actually get solved.
Dean is right; promote progressive Reps and Senators in your districts and staates. Grassroots, doncha know?
Whining about the top man when he’s been hamstrung so severely by the down-and-dirty wordsmith Republicans? That’s so unproductive. Stop whining, and get to work if you feel so strongly about issues!

Posted by: KarenJ | June 17, 2011, 11:41 am 11:41 am

I love how the Netroots Nation folks declare themselves arbiter of all things “progressive.” I can feel the arrogance from here.
I’m a bleeding-heart liberal progressive and they don’t speak for me. I wish they’d stop saying they do.

Posted by: evie | June 17, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 am

“wordsmith Republicans”
lol
Gold, Jerry. Pure gold.

Posted by: Krieger | June 17, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Oh my, the ever pervading liberal hypocrisy, when will these folks ever grow up? Maybe when they get of the big government teat and hold a real job in the private sector perhaps.

Posted by: forrest | June 17, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Why does Barack Obama not care at all about what any of these people say?
Because he can scr*w them over–which he has–and still count on their votes. Suckers.

Posted by: jim | June 17, 2011, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

there are 13 million un-employed.
There are 3 million jobs.
This is what Bush left us.
ABC and it’s commenters blaming Obama is madness.
Remember the loud protests of Bush by the base of the GOP when he doubled the debt, gutted the 4th amendment and started a war on lies?
Me neither.
But now they all claim to be opposed to deficits.
Democrats can disagree with their leaders, they always have see Will Rogers in the 30′s “I dont belong to an organized political party – Im a democrat.”
The Republicans are nothing but tribalists, and they don’t care if they burn down their own village as long as the other tribe (the ‘liberals’) suffer.

Posted by: feckless | June 17, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Does anybody remember that Obama mostly beat HIllary because he “didn’t vote for the war”? Even though he was just a part time state senator and gave one “anti-war” speech (that is not recorded anywhere) when he ran for his state seat in one of the most liberal districts in Illinois he became the guy who could get us out of Iraq. At what point does he have to return the Nobel Peace Prize?
First President in history to put hits out on American citizens without due process- Where’s the outrage?? So many things that are going in the wrong direction and because he’s supposedly the best we’ve got -his defenders allow us to be taken down a frightening road not traveled before in the belief that he’s so smart he must know what he’s doing. Trust but verify – The net roots have been mostly silent-They will be thrown bones now that they are needed again -not nearly enough. Scary times.

Posted by: Menemsha | June 17, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

We need to stop calling progressives “liberal”. There is nothing liberal about progressives. Progressives are basically nanny-state, do-gooders with a horrific authoritarian streak. From taxing people based on their sins to banning salt and smoking. These authoritarians are just about as un-liberal as you can get. They also HATE Libertarians. The reason why they hate us? Because Libertarians expose “liberals” and “progressives” for what they truly are. Authoritarian rubes bent on total government control of our lives at EVERY single level. Fom the food you eat to the car you drive to how you raise your children. There is nothing liberal about them and Libertarians show what the true meaning of a liberal is.

Posted by: juan valdez | June 17, 2011, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

there are 13 million un-employed.
There are 3 million jobs.
This is what Bush left us.
I see the followers of the Nutroots Nation are still drinking deeply of the Kool-Aid. Bush left us with a rising deficit, true. But as I recall, unemployment was in the 5-6% range. Carter left us the CRA, which destroyed the housing market, and Obama has double (tripled) down on the debt. I can’t wait to send him back to Chicago.

Posted by: GriffMN | June 17, 2011, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Chicago is a failed totalitarian city-state. This is what the left does when left unchecked, it completely corrupts and destroys. Like I said, progressives are nothing but totalitarians in disguise.

Posted by: juan valdez | June 17, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

The nutroot kooks are always angry and never happy about anything.

Posted by: Scott | June 17, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

How do they feel about the administrations plan to force manufacturers to put a government chip in every cell phone? Or about the extension of the Patriot Act? Or Gunatanomo?
Which reminds me: Where did all the war protestors go? President Peace Prize starts a NEW war in Libya and they are no where to be found.

Posted by: John | June 17, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Great post, Juan!
I get tired of hearing about what Obama “inherited”. What he inherited was a subprime mortgage crisis created by the Democratic party using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as their own personal piggy bank to funnel money to their political constituenties.

Posted by: Frank Smith | June 17, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

When Hope and Change turns to Hopeless and no pocket Change

Posted by: Mr. Potato Head | June 17, 2011, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Liberal progressives are neither.

Posted by: teapartydoc | June 17, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Great! A gathering of deceptively labeled communists, chiding the obama for not being communist enough.
Advocates of a system that is a proven failure wherever it has been used. The only thing that “progressives” have accomplished is that all those under progressive governance have had their lives get progressively worse. Their “hope” is that this time the “change” will be for the better. So they may rule the “lesser” people.

Posted by: anona | June 17, 2011, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

“Authoritarian rubes bent on total government control of our lives at EVERY single level.”
Beats bringing about total corporate control of our lives at every single level, I suppose. At least you get to vote on the government…
…oh wait, I forgot about flash-drive-reprogrammable electronic voting machines. Never mind.

Posted by: Forrest_Leeson | June 17, 2011, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

obama = a sham
you were bamboozled

Posted by: uhuh | June 18, 2011, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Karen J above knows what she’s talking about. Get those real liberals into Congress & change can happen. Unions are concentrating their strategies within their States and that’s one of the most practical ideas they’ve ever had.

Posted by: j walker | June 18, 2011, 2:34 am 2:34 am

@ J Walker. Are you talking about ‘modern’ liberals, or the classic liberal? Classic liberals believe “Govt that governs least governs best”. Modern liberals believe Govt that governs most governs best. The former offers freedom to the individual. The latter,perpetual dependency on Govt. Now is a time of choosing; free or servant? What chose you?

Posted by: anona | June 18, 2011, 5:56 am 5:56 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.