Hoyer: House Dems Want ‘significant, substantial drawdown’ of US Troops in Afghanistan
ABC News' Amy Walter (@amyewalter) report:
Despite calls from top military commanders, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, for a more gradual drawdown of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) says House Democrats want to see “significant, substantial drawdown” in the region.
Speaking on ABC’s Top Line, Hoyer said that his caucus wants "to see the drawdowns begin this summer to be more significant than the numbers that were being talked about." While Hoyer is known as one of the more moderate members of the Democratic caucus, he joined 177 of his Democratic colleagues and 26 Republicans in supporting an amendment to the defense authorization bill that would have required a speedier withdrawal from the country. The amendment was defeated by a narrow 215-204 vote.
More Hoyer: "I think Democrats want to see and what I think the American people want to see is a shift from the U.S. playing the dominating role in Afghanistan to a significant and early transfer of responsibility to the Afghan people and certainly I think the end of the year, a significant, substantial draw down would accommodate that objective."
On the domestic front, Hoyer said he’s “optimistic” that a deal can be reached with Republicans on legislation that would raise the debt ceiling. But, Hoyer said, “if there’s going to be an acceptable deal,” it needs to deal with “significant reductions in spending” as well as “revenues” (otherwise known as taxes).
“The Republicans have said they don't want to look at revenues,” said Hoyer, “but I think that ultimately if there's going to be an acceptable deal that will be part of it.”
As for the issue of whether embattled Rep. Anthony Weiner (D) can or should remain in Congress, Hoyer demurred, “I don’t know all the facts concerning this” and “as a result we’ll have to see how this plays out.” Even so, he did admit that the issue was a distraction from more substantive issues that Congress is dealing with now.
"I mean there are some very, very important critical things that we're dealing with right now. Certainly the deficit and debt are primary of those and we ought not to be distracted from that."
Email
Biden Reflects on Grief, Suicidal Thoughts
Is Congress Sounding Dumber?
Hallelujah! There are some people in Congress who see good sense and pay attention to constituents voices. Not only will withdrawal from Afghanistan, and for that matter, the entire Middle East, save billions of tax payer dollars, it will save tens of thousands of American lives. Middle Eastern countries are falling apart at the seams, and it will only get more dangerous for US and UN troops. Let’s please withdraw our troops as fast as possible. The ‘benefits’ to this move are tremendous!
Posted by: RohnertPark1 | June 6, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
My concern is are the homegrown terrorists and our borders and ports.
Posted by: phallon | June 6, 2011, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
We’re not leaving until the lobbyists for the oil companies decide to quit paying off our Congress.
Posted by: rich | June 6, 2011, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
It looks like they finally figured out they’ve lost their base and are trying to get it back without alienating the oil companies. .
Posted by: jan | June 6, 2011, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
OH…. back to the “cut and run” stance of 2004?? —– Oh, that will honor our fallen servicemen!!!! (NOT)
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | June 6, 2011, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Watch out… this is a ploy… the House Dems know they will never win a vote to prematurely withdraw… either the “left hand” is doing something… or this is posturing for a future reason!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | June 6, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
And Steny is “spot on” with his agrument. Of course I am certain that the GOP’s big “industrial/military lobbyists” won’t agree. And we just keep spending $10 million a month we don’t have.
Posted by: CND FOX | June 7, 2011, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
and what do we do left back here in Pakistan facing the Taliban ?….join them ? good we didnt even try annihilating them ( as if we could )
Posted by: Farid | June 8, 2011, 6:37 am 6:37 am
There’s no reason to stay: we’ve made our point and we won’t change the country unless we exterminate the population. We’re supporting a corrupt regime and doing things, even though righteous and with good intention, that will result in Afghans hating us for generations. There are virtually no al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and their might has been blown out of proportion anyway: as far back as 2004 the U.S. Army’s intelligence schools were producing papers saying that terrorist groups made were forming within nations, not being exported to them and al-Qaeda barely had contact with them.
Posted by: The_Mick | June 8, 2011, 8:12 am 8:12 am