The 14th Amendment: A Debt Ceiling Back-Up Plan?

ABC News' Amy Bingham reports:
With political stalemate hovering above the debt limit negotiations, some people are turning to the Constitution in search of a last-ditch plan to avoid all-out financial disaster.
Former President Bill Clinton and some constitutional scholars have argued that the 14th Amendment gives the president authority to raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval.
Read more about Bill Clinton's 14th Amendment stance here.
Clinton said this week that if he were in President Obama’s shoes, he would invoke the amendment to raise the debt limit “without hesitation, and force the courts to stop me.”
But many congressional Republicans do not agree. Rep. Tim Scott, R-S.C., said it would be “an impeachable offense” for Obama to “usurp congressional oversight” and raise the limit on his own. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said Congress would “take him to court” and Sen. John Cornyn, R- Texas, said it was “crazy talk.”
Read more about the latest debt ceiling negotiations here.
The debate boils down to 10 words in Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, which, after pulling out a pocket-sized Constitution paper-clipped to the 14th Amendment, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner insisted on quoting in a June interview with Politico.
“'The validity of the public debt’ … – and this is the important thing—‘shall not be questioned,'” the head of the Treasury said.
Neil Buchanan, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University Law School, said defaulting on America’s debt violates this part of the Constitution because it would undermine the trustworthiness of the country’s debt.
“The 14th Amendment is there to say the U.S. government is committed to always making sure that its obligations are honored,” Buchanan said. If the United States goes into default, it “will do exactly what the 14th Amendment says cannot happen.”
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said it would be up to the courts to decide if “the Constitution provision would trump” the debt-ceiling law.
"But who's going to argue against the Constitution? It's the basis of our government; it's the law of our land, and everybody has to abide by it," he said, according to the Huffington Post. "The Constitution trumps the law, obviously,"
But Laurence Tribe, a constitutional scholar at Harvard University, argues that only Congress has the authority to regulate U.S. debt. He said any presidential attempt to continue borrowing without congressional approval would therefore violate the constitution, and the Treasury Department agrees.
“The Constitution explicitly places the borrowing authority with Congress, not the president,” George Madison, the Treasury’s general counsel, said in a statement. “Secretary Geithner has never argued that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution allows the President to disregard the statutory debt limit.”
Tribe, who was one of Obama’s professors in law school, said the president understands constitutional law “as well as anyone.”
“He would have no illusions about his constitutional authority in this context,” Tribe said. “He would understand that if he tried to take unilateral action that would not in itself solve the problem.”
Obama dodged the 14th Amendment question in a Twitter Town Hall July 6.
“I don't think we should even get to the constitutional issue,” Obama said. “Congress has a responsibility to make sure we pay our bills. We've always paid them in the past.”
But Buchanan said if Aug. 3 comes and Congress has not fulfilled its responsibility to pass a debt increase, the president will have to choose between three unconstitutional options.
“You’re choosing between having the president without authority raise taxes or without authority cut spending or without authority raise the debt ceiling,” Buchanan said. “You have to sort of decide which is the least bad.”
Buchanan said he would choose the debt ceiling because “it seems a little troubling but doesn’t even come close to evil.” Raising taxes or cutting spending without congressional approval would mean a “much bigger, scarier imperial presidency,” he said.
Tribe said that if Obama chose to continue borrowing money without the Congress' OK it would be “a fundamental departure from all of our historic traditions.”
“I think it is something that should be avoided at all costs,” Tribe said. “Once the president floats out into Constitutional outer space without the backing of Congress behind him, it’s anybody’s guess how much confidence creditors around the world would have that those debts would be repaid.”
Tribe said that while past presidents, such as Abraham Lincoln, have purposefully violated the Constitution. When Lincoln unconstitutionally suspended the right of habeas corpus during the Civil War, he did so to prevent Maryland from seceding and therefore the country from breaking apart.
But the latest situation, Tribe said, is not “such an existential crisis” that the president would have to “sacrifice the whole union in order to obey the Constitution.”
Email
White House Loves Aggressive Journalism ... Abroad
Virginia Ultrasound Bill Hits Nerve
What is the world coming to? I have finally found agreement with something Tribe says. Although it might be appropriate to apply the same Amendment that grants citizenship to anchor babies, for this administration to consider the proposal from another individual who would be king is to so bend the Constitution is to make it totally unreadable.
Posted by: wantingbalance | July 20, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Other than this completely warping the idea that the House of Representatives would hold the nation’s pursestrings, a cautionary note regarding ANY amendment to the Constitution is that no party stays in power forever. What goes around comes around.
Posted by: Publius | July 20, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I don’t think the wording in the Constitution defers authority to raise the U.S. debt limit to the president. It doesn’t say that. It says “the validity of the public debt shall not be questioned”. It could be just as valid to argue that whatever the congress decides, it can’t be questioned by the president or anyone else….as determined by congress. Same with taxes. The president does not have the authority to summarily raise taxes without congressional approval. Since when does this republic defer such things to a single individual?
Posted by: LongT | July 20, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
This would be the Supreme Courts highest priority! If there has been irresponsible unfunded spending in the past it is time for “adults” to renegotiate irresponsible commitments which were made!
Posted by: Voice_Reason | July 20, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
If it comes to August 3rd and these fatalyst GOPhers have not acted Obama should invoke the 14th and unilaterally borrow.
Clinton is right.
Let the Courts decide and le us see whether they will side with the lunatics.
Posted by: STEVE_NJ | July 20, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Geithner left out a portion of Section 4, in a deliberate attempt to mislead.
“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”
Notice the phrase “authorized by law” It makes a huge difference, and shame on Amy Bingham for not pointiing out that omission.
Posted by: peccatum Dei | July 20, 2011, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Really, that line in tyhe 14th Amendment could be interpeted as making those who impede any discussions or votes on the public debt, OR those who, through their opposition to said discussions and votes crimimally liable. Not to the level of traitors, notch – but certainly liable in a big way if the US has to default…
Maybe it’s time to actually start prosecuting those who are impeding the process.
Posted by: John | July 20, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
It’s kind of like how they found a woman’s right to kill her unborn baby in the Constitution.
Posted by: s | July 20, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Or, it’s kind of like Health Care being a right. You know, like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Those government-given rights. Puh leeeze
Posted by: s | July 20, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
What kind of fool would ever want the POTUS to EVER assume such power? I guess it must be someone who has utmost faith in the brains, integrity, and motivations of every President from this day forward. Given the sad state of affairs in American politics today – on both sides of the aisle – it is hard to imagine anything more foolish.
Posted by: n'erdowell | July 20, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
‘But many congressional Republicans do not agree.’ No DUH ….THAT’S ALL THEY DO & ALL THEY ARE GOOD FOR….NUTHIN GETS DONE EXCEPT CHAOS…..THANKS GOP ….unbelievable….GOPs #1 goal -> Obama as a 1 term prez……Thanks GOP for WASTING EVERYONE’S TIME & MONEY FOR YOUR MONEY HUNGRY GIVE ME TAX BREAKS CAUSE IMMA JOB PROVIDER (for overseas) excuse me while I PUKE!
Posted by: h | July 20, 2011, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
The 14th was for the debt incurred by the south, and the south only. He couldn’t use it if he wanted too, unless he is going to pull on of those the constitution means what I want it to mean things.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | July 20, 2011, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
The Congress authorized by law the commitment of funds for this FY, that’s appropriations. The increase in the debt limit is needed to pay for expenditures this Congress autorized. So the entire Congress should be arrested, impeached, and tried for violating the Constitution. Catch 22 – the House impeaches and the Sentate tries members of Congress.
Posted by: Greggw | July 20, 2011, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
“When Lincoln unconstitutionally suspended the right of habeas corpus during the Civil War, he did so to prevent Maryland from seceding and therefore the country from breaking apart.” Right. Lincoln is a great role model. Just about everything He did was unconstitutional… Including invading the South and murdering 300,000 Southern men and boys and 50,000 Southern women and children.
Posted by: freesouth | July 20, 2011, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Seems an attempted liberal usurpation of the Constitution springs up almost daily now that the Constitutional lawyer from Harvard is in power. Is he having Clinton run the flag up to see kind of uproar it brings? Meanwhile Hillary is signing on to a UN small arms treaty specifically intended to throttle our 2nd Amendment. Folks, under a central GLOBAL government such as desired by George Soros, it would be the US citizens, rich and poor alike, who would suffer most, sacrificing all and losing our sacred identity.
Posted by: n'erdowell | July 20, 2011, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Absolute NONSENSE, ABC. Complete BUNK.
Why don’t you phony journalists print the WHOLE 14th Amendment? If you did, everyone could have read that the section you referred to is completely misquoted; the actual section includes the words “authorized by law” and the following section, Section 5 gives Congress the authority to make legislation related to all provisions of the article. Congress, not the President. It’s there in black and white, so STOP TRYING TO MISLEAD.
You lyin’ libs are just awful.
Posted by: abc4111 | July 20, 2011, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
If Arianna Huffington and Obmama had their ways, they’d be no Constitution.
Posted by: gunner_1959 | July 20, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Clinton quoting the Constitution!!! —- What a load of hoooey!! —- Progressives are always trying to CHANGE the Constitution to suit them!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | July 20, 2011, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
H – It should be everyone’s priorty to make sure Obama is a one-term president.
Posted by: gunner_1959 | July 20, 2011, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
This is kind of like seeing an image of Jesus in your muffin.
Posted by: LongT | July 20, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
The debt limit will be increased, artificial deadlines or not, and the US will not default on its debt obligations, unless Obama can figure some way to gain political advantage by defaulting. Seniors will get their SS, Medicare and Medicaid, the troops will be paid and the political manipulation opf the American public will continue, I guess ad infinitum, thanks to the utter failure of the education system to develop critical thought.
Posted by: n'erdowell | July 20, 2011, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
It’s stunning that ANYONE would think it a good idea to give this power to any one individual.
Posted by: LongT | July 20, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
But you know how those Obama worshippers are.
Posted by: LongT | July 20, 2011, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
What better way to float a trial balloon than to have a former President, of ill repute, to release it and take any flack that may come. Seems Obama is quite comfortable using Slick Willy in this manner – over and over again.
Posted by: n'erdowell | July 20, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Obama’s Czars are already trying to eliminate congress… hey… why not give MORE power to the President!! NOT!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | July 20, 2011, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
People are still confusing the issue of the debt ceiling with the budget. Congress is ultimately responsible for the budget, which allocates future spending. But meanwhile the debt ceiling needs to be raised to pay bills already accrued.
You can promise less for next year, but you can’t decide not to pay for what you promised last year.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
The debate boils down to 10 words in Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, which, after pulling out a pocket-sized Constitution paper-clipped to the 14th Amendment, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner insisted on quoting in a June interview with Politico.
Turbo timmy says? WTH……..the guy claims he isn’t even smart enuff to do Turbo Tax? Hey Turbo, apparently you can’t comprehend the 14th amendment either.
Posted by: Footie Hill | July 20, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Why don’t we just declare Obama dictator now and let him to continue to do whatever he wants.
Posted by: Footie Hill | July 20, 2011, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Re: “Sen. John Cornyn, R- Texas, said it was “crazy talk.”
No, default is crazy talk. And so is cutting trillions of dollars from the budget without ending the wars. That’s where the debt comes from–endless war. GOP wants us to be some third world country whwere all of our tax dollars are spent on wars.
Obama needs to grow a pair and use the 14th Amendment.
Posted by: Susan | July 20, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
N’erdowell: “unless Obama can figure some way to gain political advantage by defaulting.”
Since it is the Tea Party and ONLY the Tea party that think we should go ahead and default, you seem to be misdirecting your scorn.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Amendment,smadendment. Barack will do what he wants to do, spend what he wants to spend. The law is what Barack says it is.
Posted by: ray | July 20, 2011, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I don’t see what extra “power” you think this gives the President. He would merely be making sure the bills Congress has accrued actually get paid.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
it’s a moot point anyways. obama will not make this his alone to own. he will not place himself in the position of potentially being completely to blame if such a maneuver backfires either substantively or in the court of public opinion, regardless of the high reward that may come with success. obama leads from the rear and he will act similarly on this. he wants others to make decisions in order for him to either deflect criticism or take responsibility…but he will not put himself in the position as the sole entity that pushes this through. he doesn’t have the stones to do that.
Posted by: grumpopolis | July 20, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“authorized by law” refers to the incurred debt. The debt was authorized by congress in appropriations and budgets that have already been passed. It does not mean they get to vote on appropriations and obligations twice. They already agreed to take on these debts and the debt of the US cannot be in question. So, to not pay it would be unconstitutional. The debt ceiling should automatically raise to pay the bills incurred under “authority by law”
Posted by: CommonSense | July 20, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Re: “What kind of fool would ever want the POTUS to EVER assume such power?”
Nobody does, but GOP lunatics have put our country in this position. Obama has to do what he can to avoid a default.
Posted by: Susan | July 20, 2011, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
When we were a great nation, we had higher income tax rates and a lower national debt.
When we were a great nation, we had higher import tariffs and lower unemployment.
When we were a great nation, we sent Americans to the moon and didn’t imprison without trial.
We can be a great nation again, but we have to want it more than our personal desires and prejudices.
Posted by: h | July 20, 2011, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
freesouth, yeah…because it was the union that started the shooting…oh, yeah, it was that yahoo edmund ruffin who fired the first shot…and who also wrapped himself in the confederate flag and blew his own brains out once he knew the war he started was lost and had completely destroyed the south. and just so you know i’m not some yankee agitator, i was actually raised on land that was owned by ruffin here in southern virginia.
Posted by: grumpopolis | July 20, 2011, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
that’s such an a-historical and legally untenable position to take regarding the 14th. the clause geithner and bubba are citing refers specifically to debts incurred in suppressing the rebellion during the civil war. it’s not about the debt ceiling…unless of course obama decides to invade states opposed to raising the debt ceiling, i guess…declare them in a state of rebellion, craft a budget based in theory on the costs of putting down that insurrection, and then claiming it all fits under the 14th amendment. what a joke.
Posted by: grumpopolis | July 20, 2011, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Wow freesouth you completely represent the backwards thinking that comes from the right. You want to take us back 200 yrs and impose slavery on our fellow human beins and ofcourse noone from the right steps in to put you in your place because they hate just as much as you. This is the reason I would never vote republican because they only are looking out for white, straight christian men and could care less about anyone else in our country. Lincoln was a great President and he tried to set this country on the right course it needed to be when it comes to blacks.
Posted by: achillies | July 20, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
@GRUMPOPOLIS – u sure r grumpy….GOP? grumpy old people
Posted by: h | July 20, 2011, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Why do we have a law contolling the debt ceiling anyway? if Congress doesn;t want to accrue more debt, then Congress should not pass laws that accrue more debt. It makes no sense to pass laws to allocate funds, and then have another law that says we aren’t actually going to pay those bills.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Didn’t Boehner say the debt limit increase is Obama’s problem? It seems to me that the republicans in the house are looking very hard for ways to dump this responsability on somebody else so they can say “we didn’t do it!” is all Obamas fault. They forget this is their resposability and since they are in majority it’s very much their problem!
Posted by: Tiredofthis | July 20, 2011, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
H, i’m not a GOP’er clown or a democrat goofball…i may be a clown and/or goofball, but i’m a GDI clown/goofball all the way my friend. the two party system is a cancer.
Posted by: grumpopolis | July 20, 2011, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Apparently we have never bothered to determine whether the law imposing a debt ceiling is Constitutional in the first place. That might be a good place to start.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
AND WHILE THE PRESIDENTS ARE NOTHING BUT FASCIST DICTATORS WHY NOT TELL THE PEOPLE THE TRUTH ABOUT THE 16TH AMENDMENT; NOT ONLY IS THE 16TH AMENDMENT UNCONSTITUTIONAL BUT ALSO IT IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE MANY SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AFTER IT. IN OTHER WORDS, FEDERAL INCOME TAX IS A COMPLETE FRAUD BEING ENFORCED CONTRARY TO THE MANY SUPREME COURT DECISIONS FOLLOWING IT. SO CLINTON IS A DOG JUST LIKE THE REST.
REPEAL THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT AND THE ILLEGAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL 16TH AMENDMENT.
THE PRESIDENTS SERVE THE SECRET OWNERS OF THE PRIVATE BANK CALLED THE FEDERAL RESERVE THAT’S WHY IT HAS NEVER BEEN AUDITED AND THE OWNER NAMES ARE NOT EVEN PUBIC FACT! IF THE FED DICTATES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC POLICY CONTRARY TO THE US CONSTITUTION HOW CAN IT BE A DEMOCRACY -
IT CAN’T!!!
Posted by: Donny | July 20, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
achilles, i thought your only weakness was your heal…seems like mother thetis also forgot to dip your brain in the river styx as well as your foot. sure, republicans only care about straight white christian males…what a load of nonsense. and by contrast, i’m sure, the democrat party is looking out for everyone but straight white christian males? or what…they’re a universal love machine? i mean, your comments (which imply you are a member of said universal love machine) don’t show much love for those with ideas opposed to yours.
Posted by: grumpopolis | July 20, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
What a crock. Let’s also ignore that silly 4-year rule and just make BO our king.
There is plenty of money to service the debt, regardless of whether the ceiling is raised. Those are two separate decisions being joined at the hip by liberal liars.
Posted by: Open-Mind | July 20, 2011, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
I would read this as applying to the current situation as follows: if the debt ceiling is not raised, then available funds must first be used to service debt. If we had to raise the debt ceiling to service our debt, then maybe POTUS would have an argument. Also, we’d be fried even worse than we are. But in fact we can service our debt with available revenue, and the 14th amendment requires that.
Posted by: Warren Lewis | July 20, 2011, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
This in an absolute outrage! The president thinks he can do whatever he wants with our lives, our money and our country. He has to be voted out of office next year! Why are Americans not standing in protest of this and the wars over seas, and still occupying other countries and the false war on drugs?!?!? Enough is absolutely enough with all of these politicians like Obama. They serve only the industrial war complex, big business and big pharma! We need Dr. Ron Paul for president in 2012 to take back our country, bring home the troops and stop the federal government from running us into the ground!!!
Posted by: blis4us | July 20, 2011, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
OPEN-MIND
Perhaps, but the American people seem to want their government to do more than just service the debt.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
BLIS4US: “Why are Americans not standing in protest of this and the wars over seas….”
We stood up to protest the Iraq invasion and occupation BEFORE it happened, and we were dismissed as un-American.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
I assume that even if we implemented a balanced budget effective immediately, that besides crashing the economy, we would still have bills to pay. The debt ceiling is going to have to be raised one way or another, so everyone get off their high horse and just do it.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Im so glad he is a 1 term preisdent ……he is a lawyer ….has never run a buisness he does not know what he is doing this is not a color issue ..its sure his stupity……down with Obama…….people wake up the democrats are killing this country of Gimmy Gimmy Gimmy , why would anyone want to depend on Government ….I love my Independence and my money …Im sick and tired of My Taxes paying for welfare and healthcare and Illegals who steal jobs ……and Teachers who do not teach …..No to Public Unions and No to the Debt ceiling being Raised..and No to The Dream Act for any Illegals in this country fix our borders and ship illegals back to their Country…US Citizens should be standing by each other …not fighting each other..what Obama is doing is Just wrong…..This is not a Black and white thing…this is an American Thing!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Linda Brazier | July 20, 2011, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Conservatives are so turned off by Obama it makes me like him even more. I can’t think of anything about the conservative movement, especially these days, that would move the country and world forward.
Posted by: plantain_11 | July 20, 2011, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
That is what he should do, but hopefully won’t have to — the President does have the right to just raise it — (and, as an aside)they are also back bills and most payments and obligations no incurred by his administration. Something already done that has incurred debt, not some spending in the future.
Posted by: Paulette | July 20, 2011, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Linda: “what Obama is doing is Just wrong”
President Obama has, unfortunately, changed very little, and is pretty much doing what every other President has done. So I really don’t understand why you people have so suddenly decided to get so mad NOW.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 20, 2011, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
LOL!……… Wait a minute?…. Wasn’t Republican Mitch McConnell just coming up with a plan ANYWAY to “give the president the authority” to raise the debt limit, and then the congress was going to cast a “disapproval” vote?
Oh, I see…LOL!…this would do basically the same thing, but, it’s a Democrat’s idea (Clinton) so the Republicans now have to oppose it!…… LMAO!…. what “looney tunes” those Republicans are.
Posted by: Georgie_Bushie | July 20, 2011, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
TheLoyalOpposition (Teabagger) – Can we all assume you were sound asleep during the eight years of Bush, and six years of GOP majority…when the economy began its implosion?
How about the day Bush signed the 700 billion dollar bank bailout? (Did you even know he signed it?)
Oh, and the recession officially kicked in in December of 2007.
Posted by: Dalton | July 20, 2011, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
T=party LOVES the Constitution, until it gets in the way of their way of their party.
Posted by: Art | July 20, 2011, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
The decision whether to default on the public debt is independent of the decision of whether to raise the debt ceiling. As a clever scare-tactic, liberals pretend they’re the same thing.
Posted by: Open-Mind | July 20, 2011, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Why do liberals keep comparing Obama to Bush? Both are big-spending liberals. The country cannot take 12 more years of the failed Bush/Obama policies. It’s time for a conservative as POTUS.
Posted by: Open-Mind | July 20, 2011, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
If Obama raises the debt ceiling trying to use the 14th Amendment he is opening up a can of worms until the Supreme Court rules on it. He is stupid enough to do it, like his otherquestionable actions like attacking Libya without notifying Congress. He’s constantly thumbing his nose at the Constitution and the Congress. He has the gall to chastise the Congress while over looking
his inaction and falure to lead and make the tough decisions needed because he needs to see which way the political winds are blowing. He even had the lack of class to chastise the Supreme Court Justices for not voting his way.
It would seem sooner than later he will be on his way to impeachment proceedings.
America could not have found a worst person to sit in the Oval Office if they had looked for some irresponsible bum sleeping under a bridge.
Posted by: RevTech | July 20, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
I see nothing in this Amendment to our Constitution that gives the President any power or authority to raise, lower or pay our debts. The 5th paragraph clearly gives that power to our Congress only.
Amendment 14
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge
the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any
State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.
2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to
their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State,
excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the
choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States,
Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or
the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male
inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the
United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion,
or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the
proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole
number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of
President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the
United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of
any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to
support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the
enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove
such disability.
4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in
suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the
United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred
in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for
the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and
claims shall be held illegal and void.
5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the
provisions of this article.
Posted by: Lloyd | July 20, 2011, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Bill Clinton needs to go back to Haiti and shut up. He still thinks he president. Every president thinks they can manipulate the constitution to suit their own agenda. The constitution is like the Bible, it’s not subject to personal interpretation. Problem is, our president thinks he’s the supreme authority and is accountable to no one.
Posted by: 2BFree2B | July 20, 2011, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
That’s right! I don’t think Hillary gave him permission to make such a stupid statement. Of course maybe she did so he can get Barry impeached and she can run again in 2012 without Obama throwing her under the bus like in the last election.
LOL
Posted by: RevTech | July 20, 2011, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Let’s stop bickering and creating more smoke on the interpretation of the 14th amendment.Congress should do what they are elected to do,to keep the country from default. If congress choose to default,they will be solely responsible because it controls the purse.
Posted by: gabriel calzada | July 20, 2011, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Obama wants this taken to the supreme court but RIGHT NOW there are to many supremes that should (money buys SC love though) be against it unless Obama plans on there being a couple less Supremes ALL OF THE SUDDEN….I don’t see why he and Bubba on falling back on this.
Posted by: Footie Hill | July 20, 2011, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Its sad that the koolade drinkers either don’t know or ignore the fact that Obama will be the one who chooses to default on the debt as there is more than enough ro pay ALL DEBT every moth from the monthlt tax revenue the IRS receives.
Posted by: deanbob | July 20, 2011, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Section 4 of the 14th Amendment starts out by stating, “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” Note that the debt needs to be authorized by law which would require an Act of Congress. It also indicates that entitlements such as pensions need to be paid and that the US is obligated to meet the obligations of the military payroll. These payments should be given priority.
Posted by: abcviewer31416 | July 20, 2011, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
I’m 51 and have been making my plans for years to retire at 62 with MY SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT INCOME. You can’t just CHANGE THE GAME because our politicians have been so irresponsible. This is my money, and if you aren’t going to give it to me in increments at 62, then I’d like it all now in one lump sum, plus interest, and I’ll be responsible with my own retirement money. As it stands…I’M LIVID that my retirement money is even on the table for discussion.
Posted by: travelertraveler | July 20, 2011, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Get back to God, people. Time is running out!
Posted by: dashdot | July 20, 2011, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
7/20/11
Debt is always a phoney economic
systemThat is why we have bankruptcy
and forgiveness to be able to start
over from our major goof ups.
Posted by: Babs | July 20, 2011, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
LINDA BRAZIER posted “..Im sick and tired of My Taxes paying for welfare and healthcare and Illegals who steal jobs ….”
And I’m sick and tired of our government starting war after war after war after war after war……
Posted by: Faurtz | July 20, 2011, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
A lot of presidents push the envelope of the constitution. Slick Willy certainly did. I would not use him as precedence to use the 14th amendment to allow the president to arbitrarily raise the limit with out approval of both houses and the supreme court. Bama rightly backs off that idea. He is smart enough to know that would be treading on slippery ground which he is already.
Posted by: BOsux | July 20, 2011, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Cool! Nothing like getting all Constitutional in the fight against politicans!
Posted by: Jenn | July 20, 2011, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Bill Clinton was right, put all Rep House to fed court.
Posted by: jimmy | July 20, 2011, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
I have heard that there is an emergency plan ready to go if all this happens. It’s called martial law and the Constitution is suspended and you malcontents are rounded up and put in re-education camps. You do know that FEMA has them right?
Posted by: dt | July 20, 2011, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
I voted for Republicans only to get the last Democrats out!! Freshmen Republicans pack your bags. We’re going to turn over Congress once more! Believe me we’re going to boot you out. You really think we care about that much for your policies… Foolish…
Posted by: JOE | July 20, 2011, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
@Grumpopolis sez “authorized by law” refers to the incurred debt. The debt was authorized by congress in appropriations and budgets that have already been passed. It does not mean they get to vote on appropriations and obligations twice.” You are spot on, but don’t hold your breath until the Teapublicans process that. They’re hell bent on overturning the 2008 election. Obama won with the largest majority in quite some time and the Dems didn’t even have to attempt to rig the turnout like the Rs are doing in many states at this very minute. What a bunch of losers! Wah Wah Wah
Posted by: WAdem | July 21, 2011, 12:19 am 12:19 am
@open-mind???? You said “There is plenty of money to service the debt, regardless of whether the ceiling is raised.” Just because you are foolish enough to pay the minimum charge on your credit cards doesn’t make that a smart option. What the h#ll are you saying? Since the debt we incurred from previous congressional approval has come due, which bills would you pay and when and how would you come up with the others? Talk about zero ideas.
Posted by: WAdem | July 21, 2011, 12:24 am 12:24 am
President Clinton said it best. Obama should raise the debt limit and then let the Republicans take him to court.
Posted by: Douglas Pritchard | July 21, 2011, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Quoting Bill Clinton one of only two U.S. Presidents to be impeached.
Exactly what should happen to Obama if he tries this. Why not just nullify the 2010 election results?
Posted by: george | July 21, 2011, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Yep! The Republicans are all out here AGAIN(!) trying to kill the message on the basis of the messenger and accusing their “opponents” of the very things they themselves do! It is amazing that all Republicans do not cut off their LEFT hands and LEFT feet and put out their LEFT eyes just for bloody spite!
It has not been the Democrats trying to change the Constitution at every little turn, jrks! Republicans actually passed a law during the Bush term which “allowed” the president to SUSPEND the Constitution! Now when they find it maybe says they are full of beans, the Republicans are all fit to be tied.
Criminals all.
Posted by: JLS1950 | July 21, 2011, 2:43 am 2:43 am
The amendment would not work and would be routinely violated. Yet, I am very much in favor of it. It could be part of starting down the right road to solvency.
Posted by: Bob Ramos | July 21, 2011, 4:36 am 4:36 am
Only BO Octavian would try to use 14th Amendment to raise the Debt Limit without the Congress!
Posted by: OdinOftheNorth | July 21, 2011, 5:48 am 5:48 am
how many lawyers does it take to cause a problem? as many has more than one opinion of a subject.. two is one too many opinions.. like the Chief justice Robards that LEDISLATED FROM THE BENCH with the idea that a business entity had the same rights as a human citizen tho it cant be Jailed for its errors only fined Interpretation of the law has as many ilks in it as you can find want to or not.
its time Congress either did the job theyre paid to do or leave and allow someone to honestly represent the values of this nation Neither extreme are its values its value lies somewhere middle of the stream not ultra either left or right. the extremes are both wrong both immoral and take no account for public sentiment in their ideals.
Posted by: Kent | July 21, 2011, 6:38 am 6:38 am
Contrary to Clinton’s assertions, the 14th Ammendment does not authorize the Prseident to unilaterally authorize an increase in the debt limit. The ability to regulate the obligations of the united States rests solely with Congress.
If the deadline is reached without agreement for raising the debt limit, the 14th would play a role. While the US would be prohibited by the debt limit from taking on new debts, the 14th would require that the Treasury pay all existing debts and (contractual) obligations before any other expenditure. As such, the US would still make payments on the interest for our accrued ebt, would still have to pay redemption of mature bonds, would be required to pay Social Security benefits, and could not delay or avoide paying contractors for work they have already done. The government could not, however, pay for the purchase of any new supplies, allow or authorize work by hourly-waged federal employees, enter into new contracts for goods or services, provide funds to any state (except where prexisting contracts require it), or spend money in any other way until all prexisting obligations and debts are paid first.
Effectively, this would shut down the federal government in much the same way as a failure to pass a budget would. It would not however, force uss to default on our debts as the fearmongering administration in the white house repeatedly keeps claiming.
If any debt or obligation is not paid, both President Obama and Secretary Geithner would be liable and they both could be impeached for their failure to obey the law and Constituion.
Posted by: kdurham68 | July 21, 2011, 7:03 am 7:03 am
Just more rulings from our “king.” The man has no idea what he is doing. And his fellow Dems are just as dense. Sen. Harkin said, “Democrats are willing to do whatever is necessary to raise the debt ceiling, not for future borrowing but to pay the debts that we racked up in the past. Which, mostly was racked up by a Republican House, a Republican Senate and a Republican President in the last 8 years. Yet, they’re not willing to pay the bills,” Harkin said.” Where in God’s name was this man when O’Bama was spending TRILLIONS a couple of years ago?! This is why we have a “tea party” now. The present Washington “old timers” need to go home. The tea party ideas are the only ones that will get us out of this mess.
Posted by: Really!! | July 21, 2011, 7:19 am 7:19 am
There will be no default. None. The debt obligations will be paid. The seniors will be paid. The troops will be paid. Medicare and Medicaid will continue to function. ANY politician who claims anything else is simply lying and he/she knows it. Everything the liberals love, however, could not be paid unless the debt limit is raised. This would force those in power to “put their cards on the table” and set priorities. OMG! But then the people would know as well!
Posted by: n'erdowell | July 21, 2011, 7:22 am 7:22 am
So…in order not to default on our debt we need to borrow even more. That’s the solution ???
Posted by: freesouth | July 21, 2011, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Of course Bill Clinton would violate the constitution and force what liberals would call a “constitutional crisis” if the courts even considered a subsequent case. That’s not the point. A more important notation is that the liberals would consider using the amendment that “legalized” the citizenship of former slaves and prohibited southerns who had fought against the north from holding office to “claim” the right of spending what they want. Political hacks on both sides of the fence have no problem redefining words but most of us in the fields know that “validity” means nothing more than attributing legitimacy to something. Of course previous debt is legitimate since, as the 14th Amendment says in the 5th clause, the congress approved it either with appropriations or an increase in the allowable debt. Tribe is correct and Clinton is wrong. But being wrong never stopped any political hack and it certainly would not stop Obama. How appropriate for our “black” president to misuse the 14th Amendment.
Posted by: wantingbalance | July 21, 2011, 9:58 am 9:58 am
a lot of jailhouse lawyers commenting over here.
thanks for the laugh!
today’s conservatives are so silly…no debt limit increase? well, enjoy your higher interest rates, rubes! which, of course, is basically the same as massive tax increases…and just like their thinking, it’s regressive.
Posted by: Von Cracker | July 21, 2011, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Prof Buchanan argues that the 14th Amendment applies a test on any action, policy etc that would or could raise doubts as to the creditworthiness of US debt. Applying that logic, running budget deficits that incur high debt levels might be seen as also failing the test of the 14th amendment. In fact, rating agencies have already said that just avoiding default, without corresponding spending cuts, may not secure the US’s creditworthy status.
The Congress and the President have no choice but to quickly pass a temporary debt ceiling increase with matching real hard dollar spending cuts. Revenue generation is speculative. Only hard cuts can be identified and accounted for. No, the 14th amendment was not meant to be an escape excuse.
Posted by: Mike | July 21, 2011, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Do it now, there’s plenty of time to guarantee his impeachment. We have the money to pay debts, we will run out when it comes to “entitlements”.
Posted by: commonsenseparty | July 21, 2011, 11:07 am 11:07 am
kdurham68 | Jul 21, 2011 7:03:51 AM
——A perfect explanation! Great post, ut the Dems use the fear mongering just as well as the GOP.
Posted by: commonsenseparty | July 21, 2011, 11:09 am 11:09 am
To ABC4111 thank you for exposing the audacity of deception that takes place daily in government and in media. I suggest that the dialogue of the 14th amendment be accompanied by blaring background music,namely, the Beattles “Twist and Shout” c’mon baby now, c’mon and work it on out “. Recalling the rest of the lyrics is a bit scary as it seems to be the most accurate fight tune of this Administration and the President.
Posted by: Mike | July 21, 2011, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Pretty clear that courts will interpret this to mean those who hold US debt will get paid first i.e. interest and principle on tresuries. Not a good thing for creditors, military, and those waiting for SS checks. Congress has passed “Cut, Cap, and Balance” which includes a $2.4 trillion increase to the debt limit so they will not be at fault. Time for the Senate and Obama do do their jobs. “Tax and Spend” will no longer fly.
Posted by: lindz1989 | July 21, 2011, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
This “expert” constitutional opinion is coming from the guy who said, ‘it depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is” and LIED under oath, then had his law license pulled. Cut, Cap & Balance is the responsible approach to irresponsible spending going on since ’07.
Posted by: Cindy, NC | July 21, 2011, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Oh, come on! Can we really expect today’s crop of post-Watergate Republicans to respect the Constitution?!
Posted by: baronightwolf | July 21, 2011, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I don’t see that the 14th Amendment authorizes the President to raise taxes or borrow money. What it does say is that there can be no default on federal debts, including pensions. What that means is that these debts have first call on the governments money and have to be paid before other spending is done. One could read this to say that the government could cancel a contract, most have a clause for this, but would be obligated to pay for past services. Programs could be shut down, employees furloughed, subsidies curtailed, etc. but past debts would have to be honored.
Is social security a pension, maybe, maybe not. Medicare is not a pension, past obligations would have to be paid, but the program could be suspended.
Posted by: GordonO | July 21, 2011, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Interesting that Liberals read the 1st, 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments so loosely, but can’t seem to understand the relatively plain language of the 2nd A – which has a significance and meaning that is a lot clearer and a lot more important than abortion rights, pornography, commercial advertising, flag burning and the 7 Dirty Words. The Republicans that agree with this clear usurpation of Congressional authority on the budget are just as despicable. Go ahead Comrade Obama – let’s have this issue go to the Supreme Court.
Posted by: calditz1 | July 21, 2011, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
I agree with GREGGW; Congress already authorized the spending, Obama is just trying to pay the bill before our credit score drops and we spend BILLIONS more in interest. If congress is more concerned about election promises than the good of the country, then this is not the Republic we need in Washington. They were voted in to keep OUR interests. They represent US!! The $2 BILLION … (that’s BILLION) … per WEEK for the last 8 years to fund the Iraq war is what brought us to this point. It was funded by Congress and billed to the American people.
Posted by: Micah | July 22, 2011, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Have we gone crazy? Who ever elected or even heard of some guy called Grover Norquist who by scheming political maneuvering exerts such power over sixty odd new representatives in the House beholden to him for their own self serving ambitions to get re-elected. His leadership of this tiny group of ultra right wing zealots gives him the power to vitally affect the lives of 330 million citizens. Has anyone elected him to wield such power over all of our lives?? The President should do whatever it takes to preserve the welfare of this country by invoking the 14th Amendment. Even the current Supreme Court will invoke common sense in making the correct decision
Posted by: Ralph Greenberg | July 22, 2011, 10:56 am 10:56 am
If you take the words at face value, they only prioritize the debt obligations above all other dispersements regardless of existing legislated designations – meaning that much of the Federal gov’t and other dispersements (SS, contracts, mail service, subsidies etc) might be reduced or suspended until legislation is passed and signed to raise revenue, cut expenditures and/or irresponsibly raise the existing debt limit.
Posted by: Steve Berens | July 22, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
I don’t see how it would be up to the courts to decide. This is the constitution. What would the courts do? deem the 14th Amendment unconstitutional. Second, An impeachment would never happen. Having said that, both parties should find a way to cut the deficit and control the debt on a bipartisan basis. The best way to get it done, is the get rid of the extreme right (the tea party) and the extreme left (Nancy Pelosi and her crowd)
Posted by: John | July 23, 2011, 9:18 am 9:18 am
abc4111: that may not mean what you think it does. The government’s current spending is entirely the result of congress. The President did not legislate the programs and spending levels – congress did. Does the 14th amendment permit the President to default on the debt caused by Congress’ own drunken sailor spending?
I know of no argument that says it does.
Posted by: Bob | July 23, 2011, 10:48 am 10:48 am
The government is obligated to pay its debt by the 14th amendment and if it is prevented from doing so by the debt ceiling then it would seem the debt ceiling is unconstitutional. Anyway debt ceiling legislation seems like another trip to fantasy land. Probably sounded like a good idea at the time though. The correct approach is to limit spending or increase revenue before any debt is incurred.
Posted by: LenL | July 24, 2011, 1:01 am 1:01 am
It ought to be pretty simple. The debt is payable in US currency. The Treasury prints the money and makes payment to the Federal Reserve to cover the debt.
Posted by: Richard Aleksander | July 25, 2011, 12:53 am 12:53 am
It would appear that the Congress are the ones violating the Constitution if they allow us to default on our debt obligations. I find it ironic because many of these elected officials are the same ones who voted to raise the debt ceiling numerous times while President Bush was in office and all of a sudden it is agains their party platform. I am sure that the founders did not anticipate the House of Representatives holding the country hostage for political gain. I disagree that this situation does not warrant Presidential intervention if necessary, this is very much a crisis situation that will have devastating long term affects on our country.
Posted by: Newsoml | July 25, 2011, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Invokeing the 14th (right or wrong) would be at least doing something to get past all the B S going on by the “T” Party, lets move on to important things and put this debt hoopla behind us!!! GWB Racine
Posted by: GWB | July 26, 2011, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
It must happen!
Posted by: Suzanne Wiget | July 26, 2011, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Instead of trying to destroy the country for one person- President Obama, solve the problem. The debt ceiling and the deficit are two separate issues. Republicans ran on creating jobs but all they have done is destroyed jobs – example FAA. Enjoy flying:)
Posted by: Tonya | July 27, 2011, 1:26 am 1:26 am
I agree with John; maybe it’s time to prosecute those members of Congress who are impeding progress, especially if the US debt goes into default.
Personally, I think there are a number of members of the Republican Party who don’t deserve to be members of Congress simply because they are not interested in the needs of the nation; their only interest is in the Republican Party and how they can undo the Democratic Party. Bush ruined the Republican Party, not the Democrats. He’s gone, so let’s get on with reality and take care of the national needs, not the party needs.
Posted by: Syl | July 28, 2011, 2:00 am 2:00 am
For those of you blaming the GOP…what exactly is your explantation for almost 3 years of BOTH houses being controlled by Democrats for not creating a budget in the first place? (yes, right NOW, one house is controlled by the GOP).
Posted by: BT | July 28, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Balanced Fair Rights for All vs. Weber’s Bureaucracy “Cage” of DIVI$ION to Control and EXPLOIT, e.g., FEAR, GREED, Tax & Wage Flips, and pro-Technical / Org’l Systems Change, drive Human $ystem$ change –NOT, PEOPLE Drive and REJECT Change via ETHICS of CARE for fairness.
Posted by: mg kleino | July 28, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Jack Balkin has been compiling a persuasive argument that presidential invocation of Section 4 of the 14th Amendment in present circumstances very closely matches what the authors of the amendment had in mind. That section was not, as a foolish message states here, intended “for the South, and the south only.” It was intended to prevent any later congressional majority from traitorously refusing to recognize lawful debts incurred earlier by the nation or paying others to whom no debt is owed.
Yes, unreconstructed traitors from the South who made war against the nation was the immediate concern. But, no, the section was not worded to include only southern traitors.
Posted by: John B. | July 29, 2011, 8:28 am 8:28 am
I don’t see how the 14th amendment could be used to raise the dept ceiling.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Posted by: jkb | July 29, 2011, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
If I have this right the president does hold the purse strings the house does they decide what gets paid. They can defund all unesential spending and pay the dept.
Posted by: jkb | July 29, 2011, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
so… from what i read, the debt shall not be questioned, and the congress must authorize the payment of debt.
if the debt ceiling doesn’t pass and we default, then congress is committing the unconstitutional act. It is not the president’s fault, he did not authorize the payments, other than signing bills that were presented to him.
authorization for the wars came from congress (under false information), entitlements, subsidies, tax cuts, all came from congress.
Posted by: jason | July 30, 2011, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
I’m missing something. We are talking about paying debts ALREADY authorized by Congress, right? We are not talking about Obama creating NEW debts. To that extent the “authorized” language left out in the quote doesn’t seem so important to me. If Obama were going incur debts not already authorized by Congress, then he’s on thinner ice, for sure. The combination of Harvard and UC should give him a pretty good idea of what the Constitution means – at least by traditional standards.
Posted by: Rob Houck | July 30, 2011, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
If Congress does not raise the debt ceiling, then Congress will be in violation of the 14th Amendment: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, … shall not be questioned. … The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
CONGRESS HAS ALREADY AUTHORIZED THESE DEBTS. Raising the debt ceiling only allows the US to pay off the debts already authorized, hence raising the Debt Ceiling allows the debts already incurred by the US to not be questioned.
Rep. Tim Scott’s assessment is totally backwards. If Congress fails to uphold this provision, then we should impeach Congress, as they are the ones who are not upholding the Constitution.
In fact, it seems the whole arrangement of a “debt ceiling” actually violates this provision of the Constitution.
Posted by: Sabrina | July 30, 2011, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
It’s my priority to make certain that PRESIDENT OBAMA will be a two term president and he will be.
Posted by: ar | August 2, 2011, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Hey there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be ok. I’m undoubtedly enjoying your blog and look forward to new posts.
Posted by: veg mocking party | October 18, 2011, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm