Congressmen Add Insult to Oversight at Committee Hearing
ABC News' Amy Bingham and Zach Wolf report:
Committee members added insults to oversight at a House hearing today where congressmen talked over each other, demanded demanded answers from Elizabeth Warren of the controversial Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and shot snide remarks across the aisle.
Things were heated from the very beginning when a dispute over parliamentary procedure caused Rep. John Tierney, D- Mass., to ask Chairman Darrell Issa, R- Calif., “What part of the English language here don't you understand?”
After nearly two hours of questioning, Rep. Jim Cooper, D- Tenn., had had enough.
"Some of us come here and we get so used to the food fight that we want it to continue. And you'll probably score brownie points if you make your partisan hit. You might even get on a better committee," he said. "Well, congratulations. You will not have solved a problem."
The intention of the hearing was to determine how the newly-formed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will regulate financial products and prohibit those it considers unfair and abusive. This is the third time Warren has weathered the committee’s questioning about the bureau.
Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla., was intent to find out whether the bureau planned to actually ban products and seemed unsatisfied with Warren’s response. Ross co-sponsored a bill to repeal the Dodd-Frank Act which created the protection bureau.
The bureau has "a power to ban, to stop the marketing of a certain product,” Ross said. “Don’t you think, though, that should be something that you and your team are addressing as you go into your first year next year?”
“Congressman, I appreciate the advice, but actually no,” Warren responded.
“So it would be OK then that we just revoke the power?” Ross shot back, softening his question by saying “Believe me I'm being very respectful ma'am I'm from the South.”
Warren, who was appointed to help get the CPB up and running in large part because lawmakers and the White House doubted she could get the 60 votes needed for an official appointment to lead it, has become something of a cause celebre for liberals and a bogeywoman for conservatives.
She was appointed by President Obama in September to form the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency that was her brainchild.
Read more about Elizabeth Warren’s appointment to the position.
This is not her first grilling before Congress. In May, after assuming her position helping create the Consumer Protection Bureau, she sparred with Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-NC, about everything from whether the new bureau would affect credit rates to when she could leave the hearing.
Read more here about that testimony.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created as part of the Wall Street overhaul bill passed through Congress by Democrats last year. Republicans, now in the majority in the House of Representatives and with more votes in the Senate, have tried to scale back the agency, which is slated to officially open later this month even though it does not currently have a director.
Warren appeared frequently before Congress in her previous role as head of the Congressional Oversight Panel, charged with being a watchdog of the 2008 Wall Street Bailout.
Email
Haley Barbour: GOP Candidates Haven't Made the Case
White House Loves Aggressive Journalism ... Abroad
Newsflash…Not.
Misogynism still alive, well, and bipartisan in Congress 20 years after their misognynistic attacks on Anita Hill.
Posted by: whatever | July 14, 2011, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Yes, asking questions or being critical of a woman is misogyny now…unless they are a GOPer like Palin or Bachmann. Then it is a free for all.
Posted by: Paul W | July 14, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I wonder, Do you think they do this because she actually knows more about the Financial Institutions and laws than they do and cannot be bought by the Big Banks and Wall Street? Every time she is there they seem more concerned with stopping her than protecting us from what the Banks and Wall Street have done and could easily do again.
Posted by: kay | July 14, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Just more regressive and obstructionist tactics from Republicans, most of whom think the free market is the answer to everything but then blame Obama for the economic consequences of a free market with no restraints.
Posted by: drummer44 | July 14, 2011, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Republicans hate consumer protection. Thank you Elizabeth Warren! Fight for us.
Posted by: green.goddess | July 14, 2011, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
greengoddess, yeah, because those rich republicans don’t consume any goods and services. yeah…that makes a lot of sense.
Posted by: grumpopolis | July 14, 2011, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Ok Grump, you explain to us why the Repubs are trying to deregulate the market that just almost took the world economy down.
Explain why they have grilled and opposed the creation of a Consumer Protection agency if they are so benevolent.
Posted by: DewyB | July 14, 2011, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
DEWYB | JUL 14, 2011 7:05:47 PM….What market was that “almost took the world economy down.”?
Posted by: deanbob | July 14, 2011, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Now what would you expect from a committee run by Darrell Issa? Why would this surprise anyone who understands what is going on in this ‘attack’ on a person that truly wants to protect the American consumer? The GOP lap dogs of the rich like Ross and Issa were ‘commissioned’ to do a hatchet’ job on someone who honestly wants to protect the middle class consumer. How many of you out there even know who she is…her credentials or ever heard he speak her views? I’ll bet not very many at all.
Posted by: CND FOX | July 14, 2011, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
DeanBob you play coy, but you know the 2008 Stock Market crash to which I refer.
Posted by: DewyB | July 14, 2011, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
It is unclear what another protection agency is going to accomplish except to add more regulations, red tape to further hinder commerce. Right now, a business,big or small, has to deal with OSHA, EPA, and many other codes from Fed, State,County and City. We should be working to eliminate some of these agencies.
We need protection from our government, not from commerce who create jobs. Keep up the good work Issa and Grassely.
Posted by: D Roamer | July 14, 2011, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
CND FOX; And I would be willing to bet you cherry picked Darrell Issa’s name out of the story and you’ve never heard of him before.
Posted by: LongT | July 15, 2011, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Good job Ross,Issa,and Gowdy. Thanks for sticking to your principles. If the OVERSIGHT committee doesn’t ask the tough questions and demand answers then who will?
Posted by: responsibleconsumer | July 15, 2011, 10:11 am 10:11 am
LONGT….LOL…and you would be wrong. Every since the mid-term elections I have watched and fumed as this ‘total idiot’ has conducted his “witch hunts” and ludicrous “inquisitions”.
Posted by: CND FOX | July 15, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
If it wasn’t for people acting criminally, there would be no inspiration to create a comsumer protection agency.
Based on the attitude of congress, it would appear the criminals don’t want the law to get in their way.
Posted by: Wayne | July 15, 2011, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
The criminals are in Washington in this administration. Had enough of these radical people taking control of our country.
Posted by: Freedom | July 16, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Issa is such a disagreeable idiot who should wish to have 1/2 of Elizabeth Warrens intellect and grace.
Posted by: Beth Hunt | July 16, 2011, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Of course she is because she is doing the right thing. Issa is an idiot and every time he opens his mouth he proves it. This is an intelligent woman and she is resented by the republlicans because of it. She will not be made the overseer of the consumer protection agency because one..she is a woman and republicans hate smart women…only ones like Bachman. She created this agency and will probably be denied it. However, from what I see…she will probably run against the rep. in Mass. Here she has a chance.
Posted by: talmag | July 18, 2011, 11:01 am 11:01 am
A guy who postedlastpostabout costs of steel coil,it realy depends where you go to buy it, galvinized as much as£695 per metric tonne and standard is around £640 per ton- hope this helps
Posted by: c sections | September 23, 2011, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm