Family Leader Under Fire Over Slavery Comment in Marriage Defense Pledge
ABC News' Amy Bingham reports:
After two presidential candidates signed onto a pledge supporting traditional marriage values, the pledge’s sponsor retracted a part of the vow that suggested African-American children were better off under slavery.
The Family Leader, an Iowa-based conservative activist group, removed a sentence Saturday from the introduction of their “Marriage Vow: A Declaration of Dependence upon Marriage and Family” that said: "Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.”
GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann was the first to sign the pledge Friday followed closely by fellow candidate Rick Santorum.
Whoopi Goldberg was outraged by the pledge on Monday’s The View saying the slavery reference was “a stupid allegation.”
“You don’t know anything about how slaves raised their kids or why people work together,” Goldberg said. “Just don’t add stuff like that if you don’t know what you’re talking about.”
A Bachmann spokesperson told Politico Saturday that the congresswoman only signed onto the “candidate vow” portion of the pledge, which has no mention of slavery.
"In no uncertain terms, Congresswoman Bachmann believes that slavery was horrible and economic enslavement is also horrible,” Bachmann’s campaign spokesperson Alice Stewart told Politico.
Bachmann “stands behind the candidate vow – which makes absolutely no reference to slavery." Stewart added.
The candidate vow portion asks signers to reject same-sex marriage, uphold the Defense of Marriage Act, outlaw pornography and reject anti-women Islamic Sharia law.
Santorum said politicians should vow to be faithful to their wives, as the first provision of the candidate vow states. Those who are not faithful cause people to “disrespect and disregard members of Congress,” Santorum said in a Sunday interview on CNN.
“When I first read it I was taken aback. I can’t argue that I wasn’t, but I understand why they’re saying it,” he said. “If we can’t count on you to be faithful to those closest to you how can we count on you to be faithful to those of us you represent?”
Bachmann’s campaign was immediately available for comment.
UPDATE: A spokesperson for the Santorum campaign said the senator thinks the Family Leader did the right thing by removing the slavery passage and questions why more people are not signing on to the pledge.
"Senator Santorum was pleased to sign the Iowa Family Leader's pledge because he is committed to standing up for traditional marriage," said spokesperson Virginia Davis in a statement. "The bigger question here is why aren't more Republicans having the courage to stand up for the institution of marriage and signing this pledge."
Email
Republicans Duke it Out in Arizona
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
Now why would Goldberg want to mislead everyone? Or are her words being twisted? Maybe she did not know that the congresswoman only signed onto the “candidate vow” portion of the pledge, which has no mention of slavery. Sounds like both women were mislead. However, a Congresswoman can not afford to make such mistakes.
Posted by: John S | July 11, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Candidate portion of the Pledge? They signed, it doesn’t matter if they signed the introduction or not, by signing it you establish either a) you agree to everything or b) you didn’t read the entire document.
I suppose since I didn’t sign every part of my car loan I don’t have to pay it?
Posted by: DewyB | July 11, 2011, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
This is precisely why I support Michele Bachmann. I strongly support traditional marriage and I hope that with her support, Congress will pass an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman and that that states will approve it. I think this is necessary because, even in states where gay “marriage” has been voted down by the voters, its supporters are trying to use the courts to overturn the voters’ decision. We need to get this resolved once and for all. The voters have ALWAYS said NO to gay “marriage” and its time someone stood up for them. Thank you Michele!
Posted by: Karen Grube | July 11, 2011, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
What this should read is NUTCASE locked away forever in Sanitarium. This woman is crazier than the loons in the state of Minnesota. Even the ex-gov said she is shallow and done nothing while in office so far.
Posted by: Jo in Minneapolis | July 11, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
The fact that both Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum signed this pledge says that they don’t care about substance, but will use any flash means to advance their radical conservative agenda. It also says they don’t read what they sign! Neither of them are fit for public office…!!
Posted by: James | July 11, 2011, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
This pledge is just one more in a series examples of the lunacy surrounding Bachmann. She is one of the scariest candidates to ever run for office. She is a crazy liar and downright nuts! She is against medicaid and yet, her husband to whom she “submits” has made hundreds of thousands of dollars from the program. He is not even licensed to practice any form of psychology/therapy! I think she probably believes this crap. She is also opposed to farm subsidizes, but has made many, many thousands of dollars from those. She’s spouting how evil these things are with her mouth and yet leaving her hand open to benefit from them. All to show the Tea Party how anti-tax she is. Nazi is a good word for her. What does it take to get Canadian citizenship on the off chance she can actually get elected because the religious right and Tea Party are too stupid to think for themselves?! Wake up, people and smell the hypocrisy
Posted by: lisa | July 11, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
“The pledge’s sponsor retracted a part of the vow that suggested African-American children were better off under slavery.” These kind of people are still around? Stunning really.
Posted by: LongT | July 11, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
LONGT…but you KNOW that it’s probably not inaccurate given the stats on “traditional” black families today. I’m not saying it was necessary to make that distinction. But we all know what’s going on out there and how the “system” actually encourages what we’re seeing, not to mention pop culture.
Posted by: s | July 11, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
My5200…and if Republicans are all about “hate” as you claim, what’s the mantra of Democrats? Can you at least be honest?
Posted by: s | July 11, 2011, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
The looney tunes are at it again!
Posted by: BEEBEE | July 11, 2011, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
I think this is a perfect example of stupid is as stupid does! Really?? OMG these people scare me!
Posted by: Kathy | July 11, 2011, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
If they are so concerned about who can marry, then why aren’t they concerned about divorce?
I never hear any of them talk about all of the divorces that go on and on year after year. What is it, over 50% of marriages end in divorce. I never hear them talk about that!
Posted by: BEEBEE | July 11, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
That statement doesn’t even say that children born in slavery were “better off”. It merely says that both parents might have been around, which is a developmental boon to a child no matter what people say otherwise. Of course, no one is saying slavery is or was a good thing. People twist things way out of context and Whoopi is no more of an expert on these matters than anyone else.
Posted by: Juan | July 11, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
The person “not fit for public office” (@James) is the current President. He is just as much or more of a “hateful nutcase” (@My5200, Jo) than these two candidates. The vitriol just depends on which side you’re on, but both sides have gone beyond the pale.
Posted by: FranT | July 11, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Not many vote for extremists.
Posted by: borysd | July 11, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
BeeBee = whackjob
Posted by: JayJay | July 11, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
S…if you agree with the Family leader’s statement about Black children being better off under slavery but that it wasn’t necessary for them to publicly make that distinction, why are you bringing up how you feel what they said is the truth? You are guilty of supporting their statements and you actually have read them so there is no excuse.
Posted by: Paul | July 11, 2011, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
The race for the looney vote is on …
Posted by: jock59801 | July 11, 2011, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
they were better off because they were raised by two parents;UNTIL THEY,OR THEIR PARENTS WERE SOLD!and these people want to be President?
Posted by: a sane txn | July 11, 2011, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Family Leader and Michele Bachmann are Christian Nationalists, aka Theocratic Facsists. The Marriage Vow is a Christian Nationalist screed.
Posted by: John Bryans Fontaine | July 11, 2011, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Bachmann signed the pledge and slavery was listed on the pledge. When the negative reaction came in, Bachmann ppl claimed that she didn’t sign for the first bullet point about slavery – even tho it was on the same page as all the other vows she sign off on.
Bachmann most likely didn’t read the pledge and just sign it. Or she did read it and believes it.
I don’t know what is more awful. A candidate who doesn’t bother to read a 4 page pledge or a person who believes in all this slavery stuff.
Posted by: Orange | July 11, 2011, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
I just read a comment by a woman who said the reason she supports Bachmann is because she supports traditional marriage. It made me shutter. There are people out there who will vote for a candidate just because they do or don’t support traditional marriage or they do or do not support abortion. Wake up folks. There is so much more to what a President does. To a degree he holds our lives in his hands by the decisions he makes concerning serious world issues. I agree our politician’s views on issues such as marriage, abortion, and religion can be very important but don’t vote for someone JUST because they support one personal view that’s important to you.
Posted by: cahnny12 | July 11, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
This ignorants are “fit” for any public office. They should hid their heads in a “garbage bin”.
We will remember and NOT this time!
Posted by: raven | July 11, 2011, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
The person “not fit for public office” (@James) is the current President. He is just as much or more of a “hateful nutcase” (@My5200, Jo) than these two candidates. The vitriol just depends on which side you’re on, but both sides have gone beyond the pale.
Posted by: FranT | Jul 11, 2011 4:36:53 PM
Uhm….I’m sure I am missing something here but can you tell us how our President has shown himself to be a hateful nut case? In the three years that our President has been in office it has been the right wing in their non stop attacks on the President and the First Lady. Now you want to blame the President for people like you losing control and showing your ignorance? Yeah, right!
Posted by: catmom | July 11, 2011, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Was this article from the Onion? I can’t believe this is really the news
Posted by: LP Oak Park IL | July 11, 2011, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
The US Constitution will trump this political ploy for conservative votes. Is there anyone who really wants to put their vote towards someone with Bronze Age beliefs and a member of one of the most blood thirsty religions on the planet?
Posted by: hereticzero | July 11, 2011, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
I’m not for or against this pledge thing. I just think this issue is getting blown all out of shape. The first sentence states that slavery was a disaster. All the second sentence basically says is that there was one good thing that came out of this disaster. It wasn’t saying that slavery was a good thing (ex: look at previous sentence). I could live without Republicans but let’s not go around inventing things to criticize.
Posted by: Thomas | July 11, 2011, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
When people get married they usually make vows to love honor etc, if they do cheat/ stray it shows that vows mean little to them why should this ” marriage defense pledge” be any different or carry any more weight, a cheater will cheat regardless of what they have signed. Do Michele and Rick usually go around signing pledges that they have not completely read guess they don’t have the time to check them or facts out.
Posted by: realnard | July 11, 2011, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
On what planet did slaves have 2 parents?
Also, wouldn’t having two dudes as parents still be two parents? Supervision and all that? If men and women are equal, two men or two women as parents shouldn’t be a problem. Logic foul?
Sorry I fed the trolls.
P.S. Bachmann fans, please disregard:
Please, for the love of God, vote.
Posted by: JudeSoObscure | July 11, 2011, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Karen Grube. Is there ANY other reason you support Bachmann?
Posted by: archibald | July 11, 2011, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Bachmann obviously is not alone with her ignorant comments.
It is now necessary to discuss Conyers HR40 Bill more than ever. Apparently Whites in government positions know little or nothing about the heinous Slave Trade, whereby, the founding fathers sold husbands from wives and children from spouses to other Slavers for profit.
Posted by: Botofyah | July 11, 2011, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Whoopi is crazy. Who died and gave her the rignt to have an uninformed opinion. She has a responsability to get it right. If she cries race to often she will not be heard.
Posted by: pat bowe | July 12, 2011, 2:13 am 2:13 am
Politicians don’t read anything they sign. Her state (MN) just declared bankrupcy, she hasn’t passed any bill while in office. Its only reasonable we should vote her into the White House and allow her the opportunity to run this country. What magazines does she read??
Can she see Russia from her house?
Posted by: al leggs | July 12, 2011, 7:37 am 7:37 am
I think this is necessary because, even in states where gay “marriage” has been voted down by the voters, its supporters are trying to use the courts to overturn the voters’ decision. We need to get this resolved once and for all
Posted by: shaadi | July 12, 2011, 8:01 am 8:01 am
Of course, no one is saying slavery is or was a good thing. People twist things way out of context and Whoopi is no more
Posted by: SimplyMarry | July 12, 2011, 8:02 am 8:02 am
The “slavery” reference looks like a
Freudian slip indicating a true
intention to bring it back some day.
Michelle B. would probably enjoy being
an Overseer of the slaves, holding
the whip.
Posted by: Aldrich617 | July 12, 2011, 9:37 am 9:37 am
As a African American it find simply offensive that Bachmann is considered a serious candidate for the presidency. Get the slave ships ready.
Posted by: ckagmd | July 12, 2011, 9:47 am 9:47 am
LOL…LOL…and the GOP and it’s ‘ignorant base’ isn’t racist….huh?
Posted by: CND FOX | July 12, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am
If this Woman gets anywhere near the WhiteHouse this country is messed up! I mean more than it already is. The Republicans dont know what left from right and black from white. All their policies against Obama are simply race related! the stimulus plan was started by Bush but yet nobody says nothing to that? and birth cirtificates, and withholding budget bills…crazy is what crazy does! if Michelle Bachmann becomes even vice Pres. welcome to McCarthey-ism era all over again, i.e. who’s American, who’s not. no gays, no Jews, no catholics…very scary..any one with diversity and differences~!
Posted by: nathan | July 12, 2011, 11:01 am 11:01 am
The entire marriage vow was outrageous, and way too personal. Personally I would never sign such a document because of multiple legal issue concerns by actually signing it. No organization should have the right to invade my personal privacy the way this document does. My wedding vows, and my relationship with my husband and our fidelity is a private personal issue, and is none of their business.
Nor would I sign a document that relates to any possible future bills I may vote on if elected. Too many legal issues.
The slavery section that was in the original document really provides evidence of how this Family Leader organization’s philosophical stances/positions are actually false twisted logic. That section is not factually supported by any reputable history books.
I also have concern about this group making claims about the big deficit problem in US. Here they talk about national debt and wasted money, but never mention they actually receive $3 million from federal government in grants as a group. This group is getting government money. H-mmmm.
Whole marriage vow document, even the part Michelle Bachmann says is not part of the vow section, would all be legally applicable in court of law. Michelle Bachmann is not legally correct when she attempts to escape this problem. I have a problem with her statement, as she legally knows better, she is an attorney.
Posted by: Sharon | July 12, 2011, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Did they read this garbage before they signed it? I am so tired of hearing these people twist and be so ignorantto the history of the country they swear they love so much. Who the h#@! are they to say that Black babies were better of as slaves? On what plantation? During that time, Black slaves were forbidden to even marry, so technically the Black “family did not exist. Many of these babies were the product of the greedy slaveowners (and their cronies), ripped from their mothers so that the owners “legitimate” children could be tended to, and/or to be sold away for profit, and brutally whipped once old enough to “work” the master’s fields or home. Better off how? What does Bachman know? She may not be as ditzy as Palin, but she is just as ignorant about some things. After all, if founding fathers worked so hard to end slavery, why did it take them over a hundred years to abolish it?
Leave it alone people.
Posted by: msyellarose | July 12, 2011, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Sorry, forgive the typos. Typing too fast while hyped up!
Posted by: msyellarose | July 12, 2011, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Slavery was once and abomination to this country. The Europeans once described it as a “curious institution”. Families were torn apart and the “Masters” often fathered children with the slave women and kept their progeny around only to free them at death. Is this the great thing that was described in relations to African-American children?
This country will never be post racial and as evidenced the true feelings of ALL American that lives ever so close to the surface seeps out. When it does everyone becomes so surprised at what they are hearing. Well I’m not. As long as the Devil continue to roam this Earth racism will continue to flourish. And that is the sad state of our world. The Devil has his grip so tight and hard around this planet that genuine kindness, love for all, and respect has evaporated.
Often people ask “How can that happen?” Well if these evangelical Christians, Catholics, Jews, and Muslims really read and believe than they would see that the Devil of their religious orientation has such a grip on everything alive.
Granted, I admit to not being the most religious person in the world but I really try to understand others and show genuine kindess to my fellow man. It is soooo easy being kind. It doesn’t take energy and thought. Imagine the energy saved being kind to all.
Posted by: Amazed | July 12, 2011, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Well, you can retract the statement but the cat is out of the bag. Such a statement indicates an obvious bias toward our black population. These folks should take a look at the KKK. Maybe they would be amazed at how similar they are to the Kluckers.
Posted by: John from Texas | July 13, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Exactly how does this pledge promote the Republican view of a smaller and less controlling government that is concerned about helping the economy and creating more jobs?
Posted by: meccano | July 13, 2011, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Poor conservatives, will they survive the exposure of who they really are on this campaign? We all know it, but just don’t say it. This is an intelligence war. Karl Rove did an excellent job energizing this country’s most feeble minded to vote for the worlds dumbest leader, now these people are making they’re own waves. Its embarrassing to watch. With William F. Buckley’s passing, so went any hope of “intelligent conservatism.”
Posted by: Serge | July 17, 2011, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I wish this woman one million migraines in a mili-second. How dare she sign a pledge stating part of our citizens were better off during “SLAVERY” one of the worse blemishes on our country. How did she learn American History? Either she is a perfect IDIOT or a perfect DEVIL.
Posted by: Elizabeth | July 26, 2011, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
So, is he bringing back “SLAVERY” for a certain percentage of American citizens He and Bachmann real class acts.
Posted by: Elizabeth | August 2, 2011, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
This woman is so far beyond the fence post when it comes to imposing her religious views and practices it’s almost scarey. She is plainly hypocritical and radical. When you are talking about government, you have to separate church and state, uphold and respect civil rights, and come up with solutions that are viable. She does not possess any of these qualities. All I have ever heard from her mouth is this and that about Obama, no solutions, no structured criticism. She just just another political player just like the rest of the good ole boys. I’m not saying Obama has been the best of Presidents, but people keep forgetting it’s Congress with the power to spend and they are the ones stalled out. Our our economical problems didn’t just start 2 years ago. It’s fall out from bad decisions and practices from the past 2 Bush terms.
Posted by: Disgusted | August 10, 2011, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
So this means that two of our country’s potential presidents believe that a) slavery was actually beneficial, or b) they don’t read what they sign. either way, it shows that they are not suited to run for the presidential office.
Posted by: K | November 14, 2011, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm