Jul 24, 2011 8:48am

Obama and Boehner Back at the Altar?

ABC's Jonathan Karl (@jonkarl) reports:

With the opening of Asian markets now hours away and talks between Congressional leaders at a stand-still, ABC News has learned of a new high-stakes turn in the debt ceiling drama.
 
I am told that Speaker Boehner and President Obama are once again having back-channel talks on a large-scale deficit reduction plan that would include cuts to entitlement programs and increases in tax revenues. 

Boehner and Obama are again negotiating a "grand bargain" deal to address the debt crisis with deep spending cuts. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner just confirmed this in his pre-taped interview on "This Week."

Even if they can agree, however, the deal would face strong opposition for House Republicans opposed to increasing taxes and Democrats opposes to entitlement cuts. 

As you recall, Boehner and the president were close to a deal that would have included $800 billion in higher tax revenue over the next 10 years.  Those talks collapsed after Boehner pulled out Friday, saying President Obama was now demanding $1.2 trillion in tax revenue.
 
It now looks like the original framework is back in play – a deal with some $3 trillion in spending cuts and $800 billion in additional tax revenue.
 
One source described the talks as Boehner and the president “footsie” because the talks are indirect, and they are happening even as Boehner and the other Congressional leaders are attempting to negotiate a Plan B.
 
The latest development puts Speaker Boehner in his most precarious position yet:   If President Obama accepts the original deal, how can he refuse him?  But if Boehner accepts it, he is going to face a full-scale revolt from his own leadership team.  I am told that Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy and Jeb Hensarling (the 2, 3, and 4 GOP leaders in the House) have all made it clear to Boehner they will not accept a deal that increases tax revenues by $800 billion.
 
If Boehner strikes such a deal with the president, he could lose more than 100 Republican votes in the House.   It could ultimately cost him his Speakership.  But it may be the only possible way to both avoid default and address the underlying debt crisis.  The question is what it has always been:  Could such a deal pass the House and Senate?  Democrats won’t like it any more than Republicans, but a large number of Democratic votes would be necessary to pass it.
 
Tick, tock, tick, tock ….

User Comments

Am I supposed to be thrilled? If I had my way, they’d both be fired.

Posted by: whatever | July 24, 2011, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Yeah, the “Alter” of the American human sacrifice.

Posted by: LongT | July 24, 2011, 9:07 am 9:07 am

I bet they’re tired.

Posted by: Bill in NC | July 24, 2011, 9:08 am 9:08 am

This is what happens when people demand “uncompromising” government. Nothing gets done!

Posted by: larbike | July 24, 2011, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Chris Wallace asked Tim Geithner THREE TIMES this morning what his and the Democrats’ plan was if default becomes a reality and THREE TIMES he had NO ANSWER!!!

Posted by: LongT | July 24, 2011, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Well if the Dems can feel a victory in getting the Repubs to increase revenues, and the Repubs can feel a victory in getting the Dems to cut entitlements, maybe we’ll have a deal.

Posted by: warrottjr | July 24, 2011, 9:15 am 9:15 am

I guess community organizers don’t have any negotiation skills.

Posted by: Jake Tappper | July 24, 2011, 9:17 am 9:17 am

They should all be removed from office but since the u.s people are weak and scared they wont stand up to there own goverment. Look around you open your eyes

Posted by: jib jab | July 24, 2011, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Look at the pie chart of our debt, lets pretend we are home ready to pay our bills.. We put all of them in a pile and calculate how much we owe and how much is in the checking account… um Social Security bill is paid ahead for 25 years.. would you even think about that bill right now? No, we wouldnt worry about a bill to pay that is not due so lets not do it for the American Budget either!
SS in the budge pie chart is fake numbers to LIE to us, the American Public. Why is it in there then?? take it out and its obvious, MILITARY is huge now w/o SS in there.. You see, haveing 50% of the Worlds Military is NOT ENOUGH… GOP voted to RAISE military spending and Obama’s fake cuts to military retirement is all smoke and mirrors from both parties and WE the People are being scamed by both parties and covered up with this fake drama they and the press are playing out.

Posted by: DavePrice | July 24, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am

longst,
there *is* no plan if the default becomes reality.

Posted by: Ed | July 24, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Every new dollar received by the liberal Democrats immediately becomes one more dollar of debt. Not one more tax dollar should be given to that irresponsible, inept politico in the White House.

Posted by: rplat | July 24, 2011, 9:21 am 9:21 am

The party of NO. does not have a clue the impact to the fragile global economic recovery that their lillte game of politics is about to have. The dems are on record for giving many concessions while the republicans are playing politics as usual!

Posted by: Anton | July 24, 2011, 9:21 am 9:21 am

While at the alter, let them pray: Oh great and almighty tax dollars, deliver us from debt, and forgive us our tax increases, as we forgive our deficit spending, that we may forever be re-elected, delivered from shopping at Walmart, and saved from ever purchasing our own health insurance. Blessed be our friends with untold wealth and please let our enemies go bankrupt asap. Thank you tax dollars. ChaChing

Posted by: sameagain | July 24, 2011, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Geitner touched on the Republican gridlock.
In a nutshell the extreme, illogical, far right in the GOP has Boehner and McConnell by the you know whats; and the moderate GOP’ers are afraid to stand up these yahoos.
Yes, please cut and cap and watch the backlash and what I hope will be the final nail in the coffin for an extreme right wing GOP

Posted by: BJDottie | July 24, 2011, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Won’t matter what they do. Our credit rating will be lowered tomorrow. You will see the stock markets world wide start to crack tonight when they open. Obama is a total loser. Worst ever for putting us in this position.

Posted by: Digger6 | July 24, 2011, 9:42 am 9:42 am

They should pass a small short rise in the debt ceiling and the same amount of debt reduction for 6 months so they have time to really do this right. When they go behind closed doors and hurry, the American people always get the shaft.The President doesn’t want this on the table during his campaigning, his campaigning first, what’s best for the country last.

Posted by: Freedom | July 24, 2011, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Everyone should recognize, consider, and remember the role that the Supreme Court’s Citizen United Ruling has played in precipitating this crisis, and also consider the role it will continue to play in shaping, warping, and dominating the American political scene.

Posted by: sameagain | July 24, 2011, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Why are these crazed new freshman Republicans so against increased revenue, even when it comes from closing useless tax loopholes (ie. do people with million dollar second vacation home really need the govt. subsidizing them with a mortgage deduction?) We are at the lowest level of revenue relative to GDP in over half a century. We can’t continue on this path of continuing to reduce revenue year after year, with an aging country and crumbling infrastructure.
Their “no revenue” dogma is bizarre and ruinous to the country.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Lord help us if Eric Cantor becomes Speaker of the House!!! Nothing will EVER be accomplished then. what is wrong with this Congress???? Someone somewhere has got to compromise. Isn’t this what it is all about?

Posted by: Retired | July 24, 2011, 9:56 am 9:56 am

“Obama is a total loser. Worst ever for putting us in this position.”
Obama did not put us in this position. The Republicans did. The debt ceiling, which was raised nearly every year under former Pres. Bush and under every President for nearly a century, has NEVER been held hostage like this. NEVER. What the Republicans are doing is nothing short of economic terrorism.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 9:58 am 9:58 am

“Well if the Dems can feel a victory in getting the Repubs to increase revenues, and the Repubs can feel a victory in getting the Dems to cut entitlements, maybe we’ll have a deal.”
If only. Not with these radical Republicans. They can’t seem to take “yes” for an answer. They will destroy the country if it means they can thumb their nose at Obama, even after he’s given them almost everything they want.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Boehner Plan: CUT, CAP and BALANCE — Obama plan: TAX, SPEND and GRIN.

Posted by: Martink | July 24, 2011, 10:00 am 10:00 am

No ‘throwing everyone out’ and ‘starting over’ is another example the ‘oversimplified, blinders pointed to the past’ that the new tea party freshman represent that is totally gumming up the works. It also gives the ‘dumbed down’ in this country a forum to excorciate the government with absolutely NO EDUCATIONAL OR INTELLECTUAL UNDERSTANDING of what they are ranting or railing against. That is what happens in an anarchy. The only good thing about this is current situation is that eventually this type of ignorant, unwilling to change demographic will get smaller. Then maybe this nation can get somewhere POSITIVE!

Posted by: CND FOX | July 24, 2011, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Libs, just shut up already! Your “lets blame the Republicans” for everything is getting old. You had from 2007-2011 to unscrew everything and from 2009-2011, you had everything (Senate, House, and the White House) and still did nothing to help us out. Guess what, YOU FAILED!!! So just shut your pie hole and get out of the way!

Posted by: indyusmc | July 24, 2011, 10:08 am 10:08 am

INDYUMSC….and the GOP’s mantra of just say NO, torpedoing 300 bills with the use of the silent filibuster, their silent support of the stupid ‘birther issue’ etc. etc. had absolutely NOTHING to do with this? And how many times have we come close to a deal and they have WALKED AWAY from it? Maybe we don’t ‘shut our pieholes’ because we actually ‘pay attention’ to what really has happened and what is going on now. THe GOP cannot control the ‘cancer’ of their philosophical views…the tea party. And I guarantee that that level of stupidity and negativity will DESTROY them, before this is over. And the GOP ‘spinmeisters have only themselves to blame for that. For pandering to an ignorant, past thinking element.

Posted by: CND FOX | July 24, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am

indyusmc wrote, “Libs…..had from 2007-2011 to unscrew everything and from 2009-2011, you had everything (Senate, House, and the White House) and still did nothing to help us out.”
Interesting. So you admit that BEFORE the Democrats were in charge, the Republicans totally messed up, right? Otherwise, why would we need to be ‘helped out’? Why would we have to ‘unscrew everything’, unless it GOT ‘screwed up’ in the first place BY the GOP? THEY controlled the White House and Congress for most of the 6 prior years, right? At least you are willing to admit the truth about HOW we ended up where we are…….

Posted by: Searambler | July 24, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Tom Coburn on “Meet the Press”>Obama will be presented w/a two-step plan..either Obama will sign or force the country into collapse.

Posted by: David From Texas | July 24, 2011, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The Republicans are the only ones that have offered any plans, legislation or ideas to solve this problem. The Democrats are willing to let the country fall into total collapse and chaos . . . so grab you socks it’s about to come crashing down on all of us and we may not be able to recover Sad but try.

Posted by: rplat | July 24, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Yes, Bush spent too much; but, Obama has increased spending 30% since coming into office. The federal govt is bloated and obese. Even Michelle Obama recognized the obese need to go on a diet.

Posted by: deanbob | July 24, 2011, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Compromise, yes, but fairly looking at all the true causes of this problem. They need to push out the debt limit, and start to make surgical changes from both ends, while working to keep the mainstream of this economy, the middle class on its feet, OR THEY CAN JUST TAKE A SLEDGEHAMMER, TO THE FOUNDATION OF THIS COUNTRY. I agree there are people who I see everyday that abuse the system from the bottom, while you have people at the top, like the oil cos. BLACKMAILING the economy, with higher oil prices if taxed on their billions. We have local government people being jailed, for accepting gifts, in exchange for contracts, while you have the big corporations giving millions to Republican congressmen to fight taxes on their billions. These billions are enhanced by replacing taxpaying consumers, with non-tax paying computers, and slave labor from 3rd world countrys, while they complain about entitlements to the people they threw out on the street. I think both parties need to start looking at their own backers, and do some thorough changes. Make the whining wealthy EARN their tax breaks, by actually hiring people, or paying into good health care. Get the alleged non-profit health care places to get honest about their profits, and have the Democrats start looking at where the enitilements are going. There are under, and unemployed, who are doing whatever they can to survive, and then there are people sitting around with their hands out. There are people who have worked their whole life, paying into social security, hoping to live a few years before they die, who will be lucky if their kids can bury them, while there are people at the top with UNGODLY amounts of money fighting to avoid taxes on their summer homes. THINK,THINK,THINK!!!

Posted by: parma hts gary | July 24, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am

How much has spending increased since Pelosi and Reid took Democratic control of both chambers?

Posted by: deanbob | July 24, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am

The President doesn’t want this on the table during his campaigning, his campaigning first, what’s best for the country last.
Posted by: Freedom | Jul 24, 2011 9:44:07 AM
You hit the “nail on the head”. Obama does NOT want this coming up again during election year. Obama could care less about America…its all about him and his campaign. The GOP has offered 3 plans, the Democrats have offered nothing…even Geithner had to admit that this morning. I think the GOP will offer a two-step process with a “patch” to raise the debt ceiling. Boehner already has bipartisan support. It will go to Obama, then he will veto it. The collapse of the economy will be on Obama’s “head”. He is a DISGRACE to America!

Posted by: David From Texas | July 24, 2011, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Where is the Senate/Obama written plan for the debt ceiling? Is it in the same drawer the current and last year’s budget is?

Posted by: deanbob | July 24, 2011, 10:31 am 10:31 am

I have decided that the average American must speak up. I am not a political person but an average American with the best interest of my country at heart. I have set on the sidelines for years now observing the polical ranglings of so many different “special” interest groups in both parties with out speaking up. I feel compelled to voice my observations now. What has finally made me speak up? Rush Limbaugh and his obvious influence on the political landscape of this country. Here goes…How can an admitted entertainer garner so much support for such serious decisions as those being debated by our elected representatives. Limbaugh has never and in my opinion could never be elected to public office. His views are only supported by a small percentage of the population. But a percentage that is driven by self serving, bigoted ideaology that drives them to action much faster than those of us who are not as driven to force our view on others. Now when calls from these Limbaugh followers can influence a congressman to change his decision to “compromise” in the best interest of this country it is time for those of us who really care about the country to speak up. Call you representative and ask them to “compromise”, do not fall victim to a small contingent of self serving, uninformed zealots.

Posted by: Mary Lou | July 24, 2011, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Oh brother…stop with the scare tactics….our credit rating has already been lowered to AA by atleast one credit reporting agency and Moody’s has already hinted they are going to lower us for DEBT. Our rating is going down and the only way to get our rating back up long term IS to lower the debt. No more raising the debt ceiling—cut spending, and stop allowing our corrupt government of both parties from spending (aka Redistributing to their buddies.)

Posted by: Evilbunnies | July 24, 2011, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Smoke and mirrors… Middle American is screwed, again.

Posted by: Randall | July 24, 2011, 10:39 am 10:39 am

@RON
SO are we supposed to raise the debt ceiling every time we reach it?
Should we have a credit limit?
I know Bush was a spending disaster but most of the uncompromising republicans in the house were not there when Bush was president.
I think this situation is being way overblown.
We can still pay Social Security and the military as long as we prioritize.
There are Government departments that could be downsized or closed, and our trillion+ fake debt we owe ourselves, thanks to the fed, could just be destroyed.

Posted by: the truth | July 24, 2011, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Deanbob…do you have anything but ‘right wing, oversimplified soundbites’ to offer? Or is that your ‘job’ to ‘beat the negative drum’ for the base?

Posted by: CND FOX | July 24, 2011, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Re: Boehner’s “2 step process”… I thought Boehner’s watchword for the past 2 years or so has been “uncertainty”. “Uncertainty” about taxes, govt. regulations, etc. is what has been holding back the “job creators” and the economy according to Boehner. So how will having to go through this whole nauseating spectacle again next year affect “uncertainty”? Hmmm? I’d like some reporter to ask him that question.
The answer is that the Republicans want a 2-step process because they rightfully assume that such “uncertainty” will hold back the economy over the next year or so, possibly leading even to a downgrade of our credit rating because the credit agencies can have no assurance that “step 2″ of this will go any better than step 1. Such uncertainty and credit downgrade will lead to higher interest rates, reduced GDP growth and higher unemployment, thus keeping Obama from being reelected, they hope. That is their only goal here. Mitch McConnell said himself that his ONLY goal was to make Obama a one-term President.
These Republicans do not care are about the country. They will gladly hinder the economy over the next year and a half if it will help them capture the White House in 2012. I hope voters are paying attention and now see who has their best interests at heart and who doesn’t.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Obama’s thing to get elected was “Vote for Change” we got it.

Posted by: Tom | July 24, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Randall— That is the problem in this country today, is neither party understands moderation. The strength of a 2 party system should be a synergy, with the strengths of both parties meeting in the middle, and right now, I am completely repulsed by the Republican party, whose idea of compromise, is complete surrender, by the Democrats. The Democrats have their share of problems also, but right now, even with Obama in office this country is being run by big corporations, led by the like of Rupert Murdoch with the False News Network.

Posted by: parma hts gary | July 24, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am

“Obama and Boehner Back at the Altar?”
These 2 moving to NY, also?

Posted by: ajax659 | July 24, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am

This article doesn’t talk about what HUGE cuts to entitlements are being considered. Since Social Security retirement benefits aren’t really an entitlement, but our own money we invested for the purpose of having retirement income, then can I assume the government isn’t PLANNING ON RIPPING ME OFF so that the Super rich can take my money?

Posted by: travelertraveler | July 24, 2011, 10:48 am 10:48 am

@Ron, I disagree with you. Republicans want the country on a balanced approach when it comes to spending/revenues. Again, the GOP has presented THREE budgets, the Democrats have offered NONE. Obama, is more concerned about his reelection possibilities (which will not happen) than he is about the strength of America. Geithner was asked three times this morning where the Democrats budget was, he could not answer. Boehner has taken the initiative, held Obama’s feet to the fire and is not giving in. Obama will either have to agree to a two step process to save the country or veto it. Either way, Obama will be the blame for the collapse of the country. Reid, Pelosi, and McConnell are all on board this morning for the two-step deal…its Obama, alone, that is against it.

Posted by: David From Texas | July 24, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am

The president is going to have a difficult time winning re-election if this deal doesn’t get done soon. This is why the ball is in the republicans court.
A deal will get done, no matter how republican leaning it is. The president cannot let a failure to reach a deal ruin his chance at 4 more years. If no deal is reached, both parties look bad, but the president will be in the spotlight.

Posted by: JRWINNER | July 24, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am

No, Tom, what you go when you voted in uneducated tea party yahoos in 2010 was this mess. Congrats!

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 10:52 am 10:52 am

INDYUSMC | JUL 24, 2011 10:08:30 AM posted: “Libs, just shut up already! Your “lets blame the Republicans” for everything is getting old. Guess what, YOU FAILED!!! So just shut your pie hole and get out of the way!”
This is a perfect example of what our nation is up against. Misinformed, inflexible, and mean spirited conservatives whose solution is to crush government services. Fortunately, they are not a majority.
Despite what these anti-government saboteurs say, non-defense spending, such as foreign aid, education, and “socialist” programs) has NOT been the major contribution to our national deficits for decades. In fact, it accounts for only 15% of the budget.
Cutting these programs alone is simply NOT enough to reduce the deficit.
So why is our national debt so huge? First and foremost, the Bush tax cuts have had the most effect. If all of them expired as scheduled at the end of 2012, future deficits would be cut by about HALF, to sustainable levels.
Second, this Great Recession’s job losses caused a huge dip in tax revenues. In our past, the federal government’s SHORT TERM job was to spend to help us out of a deep trench. Obama’s stimulus spending was just that, short term.
Clearly, our nation still needs stronger job creation policies. And, increasing the tax rates can actually stimulate job growth.
How? The past decade of low taxes encouraged profit taking – higher CEO salaries and stock market investments. On the other hand, returning to pre-GW Bush tax rates can encourage companies to re-invest profits into their businesses to AVOID paying taxes. More Research and Development, new facilities, and market expansion adds jobs.
So there are ways our nation can move out of this deep trench. Continuing tax cuts for the wealthiest is NOT the answer. It will take not only cuts to government services, but also new revenues and closed tax loopholes. It appears the only way to get this done is to vote out extremist Libertarian style Republicans at the national and state levels.

Posted by: green.goddess | July 24, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I did not know how BAD Obama’s rating sucked until I compared his with Bush I and Bush II. That is sad Obama. Man, did I waste a vote. You can check them buy going to Gallup.. bottom of page.

Posted by: ajax659 | July 24, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am

So let me get this right. The gop have three budgets and the democrats have none.
Yet, it is the gop who is at fault for not proposing something.
Democrats are sick in the head.

Posted by: Kate | July 24, 2011, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Yes, Ajax659, you did waste your vote on McCain and the thrilla from Wasilla.
(psst… none of us are fooled by you)

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 10:57 am 10:57 am

@ron
@cnd fox
How is raising the debt ceiling good for the country?
Previously, The US owned our own debt.
Now foreign nations own the majority of our debt.
That gives foreign nations leverage over our economy.
I supported Obama’s NO vote on the debt ceiling when Bush was president and I support the obstructionists NO vote NOW!

Posted by: the truth | July 24, 2011, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Obama did put us in this position…no one, not even Bush, spent this much or should I say REDISTRIBUTED to GE, GM, GOLDMAN SACHS, UNION HEAD HONCHOS, OVERSEA ENTITIES, GEORGE SOROS ETC. Obama has swindled more than Bernie Madoff.

Posted by: Evilbunnies | July 24, 2011, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Why do the Republicans always have to be the grown ups in the room, doing the right thing for the country, while the dems can be petulant tax ravenous little rodents? Why Boehner has to be concerned abt the Asian markets and the bummer can just enjoy his lobster salad by the poolside and just cool his heels ?

Posted by: Simin | July 24, 2011, 11:01 am 11:01 am

If Republicans are really so against taxes, then why would they think it’s okay to take our Social Security Retirement money from us? Basically this amounts to TAXING us by taking money that is already ours. SO DON’T BE HYPOCRITES REPUBLICANS..FAIR TAXATION means everyone pays, including the Super Rich, Rich companies like GE, and Subsidies like giving Billions to Rich Oil companies…amoutn to HUGE TAX BREAKS…Why can’t Republicans JUST BE FAIR?

Posted by: travelertraveler | July 24, 2011, 11:02 am 11:02 am

“How is raising the debt ceiling good for the country?”
It’s not about being “good” or “bad”. It’s about being necessary.
Most countries do not have a “debt ceiling”. It’s a silly construction that has nothing to do with actual budget decisions. The Congress votes for a budget, allocating funds, etc. Then the “debt ceiling” needs to be raised to pay those bills. The debt ceiling does not allocate those funds. They’ve already been allocated by law. They must be paid according to the law. Not raising the debt ceiling does not solve that problem.
The time to make budget decisions is when writing the budget. Not raising the debt ceiling is akin to not paying your credit card bill when it arrives in the mail. You’ve already bought the items. Not paying the bill doesn’t unbuy them. Not paying the bill only ruins your credit rating and raises your interest rates. That’s the same thing not raising the debt ceiling would do to the country, which would ironically make the debt WORSE, by raising out interest payments.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 11:02 am 11:02 am

LOL…LOL…and the oversimplified, black and white element of the right wing is at it again with ‘no budget presented garbage’. What in the world do you think has been going on in negotiations for the past 6 months? Your in the ultimate power situation. Do you think for one second you would present a ‘budget plan’ that the opposition could ‘pick apart’ with the hel[p of the ignorant public or would you talk privately to get the deal done? And oh by the way…no GOP President would ever be dumb enough to tie his hands with a ‘balanced budget amendement’. That was ‘ a public negotiating point’ for the dumbed down to latch onto with their ‘black and hite, oversimplfied’ outlook on life.

Posted by: CND FOX | July 24, 2011, 11:03 am 11:03 am

GREEN GODDESS- Great common sense comment. As Always.

Posted by: parma hts gary | July 24, 2011, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Speaker Boehner said that the $800B “revenue enhancement” deal is still on the table. This puts the decision squarely back with the President. If the President wants to increase revenue from this “agreed upon” level there should be proportionate additional spending cuts offered!

Posted by: Voice_Reason | July 24, 2011, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I like most other people was caught in 2008 lost most of my 401k retirement during the US housing and economic collapse (it was the GOP grand time in Bush years). But this time, I am prepared. Whatever the economic and stock situation made by GOP for the wealthy top 1% on Wall Street, SELL HIGH and BUY LOW to stay on top. I feel sorry for the middle class, only the wealthy can have extra money to play this game to be a winner.

Posted by: simonpeter | July 24, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am

So many of you dont understand how this is going to play out. The dems already voted down Boehner’s deal. What will happen is they wont accept Boehner’s deal, the President will simply raise the debt ceiling and no spending cuts will take place. This is going to anger people about our governments lack of spending control but it will save our credit rating. I think that the dems intended to vote in favor of Boehner’s plan so they could blame him for the ensuing problems after it passed. He may have dodged a bullet though because the bill didnt pass the senate. Now the ball is in the hands of the Obama administration and I expect them to fumble as usual.

Posted by: Paulie | July 24, 2011, 11:09 am 11:09 am

@ron
“It’s not about being “good” or “bad”. It’s about being necessary.”
I don’t believe its necessary.
There are plenty of cuts that don’t include SS that could be made.
Including defense and closing foreign bases.
The Fed holds over 1 trillion in debt over the Government as well. Makes no sense at all.
I couldn’t care less about other countries having no debt ceiling.
Did Greece have a debt ceiling?
So, your saying it’s ok to buy stuff you don’t have the credit for, then get your credit limit increased once the bill comes?
I disagree. Regardless of party.

Posted by: the truth | July 24, 2011, 11:13 am 11:13 am

2001 5,950
2002 6,400
2003 7,384
2004 7,384
2005 8,184
2006 8,965
2007 9,815
2008 10,615
2009 12,104
2010 14,294
After the Dems gained control of House and Senate, they decided half a trillion wasn’t enough for them to spend. They started with almost a trillion, then 1 1/2 trillion, then 2 TRILLION. Now they think they can’t make it another year without 2 additional TRILLION. DEBT!

Posted by: wheresmymoney | July 24, 2011, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I’m a registered “independent” meaning I can’t vote in any primaries (at least in my state we’re not allowed), but when it comes time to vote in the general election, I’m going to remember those who were intransigent and vote against them. Ordinary people like me have GOT to voice our disappointment and opposition to in the-pocket-of-the-tea-party candidates, or opposition to heavy-on-the-taxes-and-entitlement democrats, and opposition to republicans who want to shut down all entitlement programs and still spend so much on war and war game toys, as well as letting the very rich keep huge tax breaks while talking about sacrifice for the common man, the wage earner. As is evident, I think the blame for this can be spread around to all involved.

Posted by: Ron Donaghe | July 24, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am

The democrat party continues to be the party of “no” and will agree only if it is given more money to play with.

Posted by: Doug | July 24, 2011, 11:17 am 11:17 am

THE TRUTH…what can I say to someone who doen’t obviously understand what ‘defaulting on debt means’, who doesn’t understand how a nation of 300 million plus – many of whom are poor or soon to get extremely poor – operates, or who obviously has no clue what a’debt rating meeans’ in relation to how the world financial system operates. What can I possible say beyond that – to dent that kind of blind (possibly self-serving greedy) ignorance?

Posted by: CND FOX | July 24, 2011, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Do we think raising the debt ceiling every term for the past century was the right thing to do? Did the ever growing debt actually help get us here? Seems pretty obvious doesn’t it?

Posted by: Rich | July 24, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Every time the Democrats parlay the increased taxes with spending cuts, the taxes get raised and nothing gets cut. This is the basis for the reluctance by the Republicans. Why should more money be collected and given to the irresponsible Dems to just put into a rat hole like they did with the stimulus and all of the bail outs they did. I know; I know – GWB was in power when TARP was done, but the Dems put the car in ROAR gear and just plowed through trillions after that. Now it is the Republicans’ fault? Also, this is just the debt ceiling increase – what about the deficit. Oh, I forgot, we don’t have a budget because the Dems can’t seem to put one together. SIGH.

Posted by: JWinATL | July 24, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Obama and Boehner are wrongly going to pay for any big decision…I’m starting to like Boehner a little; I think he is trying to do SOMETHING along with the president. This is in stark contrast to all of the others who stand to lose very little, like Kanter and McConnell.

Posted by: Guscc | July 24, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am

The Democrats have their share of problems also, but right now, even with Obama in office this country is being run by big corporations, led by the like of Rupert Murdoch with the False News Network.
Posted by: parma hts gary | Jul 24, 2011 10:46:24 AM
You fail to mention Soros and his media outlets, Inmelt, Buffet, etc. OBAMA is being run by big corporations. He is nothing more than a Soros puppet.
Look up how Soros and Brazil oil. Obama told Brazil we will be their best customers….

Posted by: wheresmymoney | July 24, 2011, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Why does the president have an American flag pin on his jacket and not seen on Boehner during this debt ceiling debacle?

Posted by: phallon | July 24, 2011, 11:24 am 11:24 am

evilbunnies wrote: “Obama did put us in this position…no one, not even Bush, spent this much or should I say REDISTRIBUTED to GE, GM, GOLDMAN SACHS, UNION HEAD HONCHOS, OVERSEA ENTITIES, GEORGE SOROS ETC. ”
I don’t know what exactly you’re referring to with “GE”, “UNION HEAD HONCHOS”, OVERSEAS ENTITIES” and “GEORGE SOROS” but the GM bailout was put in place by Bush (after Obama came into office, he changed the terms so that GM actually had to restructure itself and pay back the money to the government, something Bush’s bailout of GM didn’t do) as was TARP also done in 2008 when Bush was President, which I assume is what you’re referring to when you say Goldman Sachs.
You’re confused.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 11:25 am 11:25 am

A flag pin for the sake of wearing it (or not) isn’t a concern. I want to see walk the walk not just talk the talk

Posted by: Rich | July 24, 2011, 11:27 am 11:27 am

If you think about it, a reduced credit rating isn’t a bad way to encourage reduced borrowing. If one borrows less, then higher rates of borrowing are a reduced problem. Seems the markets are bloated anyway, guess it might me time for reality check and readjusting, say back to 8000 for the DOW.

Posted by: Rich | July 24, 2011, 11:30 am 11:30 am

“2001 5,950
2002 6,400
2003 7,384
2004 7,384
2005 8,184
2006 8,965
2007 9,815
2008 10,615
2009 12,104
2010 14,294″
This chart proves my point.
The Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and are the single biggest contributor to or current debt. Search google images for “cpbb debt graph”.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am

As President Kennedy said “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country”! He didn’t say “Ask what everyone else should be doing for your country”! The question for each party is: What will you offer! instead of: You are not doing enough! Each should make their best offer and move to approve it!

Posted by: Voice_Reason | July 24, 2011, 11:35 am 11:35 am

It was okay to raise debt celing during Bush year because it was also grand time for both GOP house and senate. It was not okay for Obama’s time after he spent so much money to save the banks, big finance companies and car makers and etc for the wealthy top 1%. GOP, play your game to cause stock market like a roller coaster ride. ONly this way, the weathy can make money by Selling high and Buying low. Who can play this game, only the top 1% can have money to do this. That why GOP is the wealthy top 1% machine who will never allow rasing tax on them.

Posted by: simonpeter | July 24, 2011, 11:39 am 11:39 am

9:26:31 AM How clever.

Posted by: opentosuggestion | July 24, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am

MARY LOU | JUL 24, 2011 10:33:38 AM…..So what do you think of George Soros and the billions he is spending to shape politics, organizations, and people in the mold that he desires?

Posted by: deanbob | July 24, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am

RON | JUL 24, 2011 11:34:59 AM…..The Bush tax cuts produced record TAX REVENUE (see Dept Treasury charts) in 2005 and 2006, and was on pace in 2007 for another record when the market turned down in Oct (of 2007).

Posted by: deanbob | July 24, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am

or who obviously has no clue what a’debt rating meeans’ in relation to how the world financial system operates. What can I possible say beyond that – to dent that kind of blind (possibly self-serving greedy) ignorance?
Posted by: CND FOX | Jul 24, 2011 11:19:29 AM
Did you make the same speech when Obama AND Reid voted against raising the debt ceiling?
There is a bigger reason our debt rating may be lowered. Government is SPENDING TOO MUCH.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | July 24, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am

SIMONPETER | JUL 24, 2011 11:39:56 AM….The bottom 49% pay ZERO federal income tax. The top 5% pay almost 60% of federal taxes.

Posted by: deanbob | July 24, 2011, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I expect them BOTH to get to work and get something done. Hard line politics will get us NOWHERE.

Posted by: Laura | July 24, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

“The top 5% pay almost 60% of federal taxes.”
Apple and oranges comparison. You’re comparing population #s (“5%”) with monetary numbers (“60% of federal taxes”).
You need to compare like to like or your equation is invalid. How much of the country’s income/wealth does the top 5% of population have? I guarantee it’s not 5%. Thus your comparison is useless.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Ron,
The President and his party had total control from 2008-2010 and could have raised the debt ceiling by $5T if they had wanted to – they did not.
If the President was serious about deficit reduction, he could have submitted a budget request in February that reflected that priority – he did not. In fact, what he submitted INCREASED spending, and not even ONE Democrat voted for it.
By all means, keep buying the line that it’s all those evil, evil Republicans causing this.
Federal spending has increased 30.1% in the past three years. The debt has increased by nearly $5T since Obama has been President. The Republicans’ fault? I think not.

Posted by: TXSaint | July 24, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Ron,
The President and his party had total control from 2008-2010 and could have raised the debt ceiling by $5T if they had wanted to – they did not.
If the President was serious about deficit reduction, he could have submitted a budget request in February that reflected that priority – he did not. In fact, what he submitted INCREASED spending, and not even ONE Democrat voted for it.
By all means, keep buying the line that it’s all those evil, evil Republicans causing this.
Federal spending has increased 30.1% in the past three years. The debt has increased by nearly $5T since Obama has been President. The Republicans’ fault? I think not.

Posted by: TXSaint | July 24, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

A successful negotiation leaves neither party feeling like they got their way. I feel like wearing a bag over my head. The leadership in Washington is making us look like children in the eyes of the world.

Posted by: Disappointed | July 24, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

opentosuggestion 11:46:20 AM…Thanks!
..and may I add to the narrative that all members of Congress respond in reverence, echoing gently throughout the halls and chambers of the Capital Building a heartfelt affirmation of these stated beliefs through the utterance of a unified chorus of ‘ChaChings’, while checking their Blacberries for the balances on their campaign funds accounts.

Posted by: sameagain | July 24, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Chankawa wrote: “Actually, American people can survive and live much better off WITHOUT this black guy Barack Obama,”
Nope. Republican/Tea Party animosity towards Pres. Obama has absolutely nothing to do with race. Nothing at all. Don’t even accuse them of it or they will be extremely insulted and accuse you of “playing the race card”.
Wait for it…

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

If not now, when?
And I mean global economic depression. It is inevitable whether now or a decade from now, given the history of the business cycle which, historically, has included an occasional Depression period.
It will happen sooner or later, afterwhich recovery begins.
So, if now now, when? We appear to be psychologically somewhat ready for it. That would be better than it suddenly happening overnight, when we are not expecting a Depression.

Posted by: Rudy Haugeneder | July 24, 2011, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Yeah, yeah, most countries don’t have a debt ceiling…zimbabwe, venzuelea, Greece………..why in the world would the US not want a debt ceiling to prevent becoming like them?

Posted by: Evilbunnies | July 24, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

@ Green.Goddess; I am far from being an aniti-government saboteur, in fact, I have served this country for almost twenty years and gone to combat on more than one occasion. I have also lived through this political mess before (1979 and 1995) and really do not want to go through it again. Unfortunately, we are. As far as misinformed goes, 95 percent of my job is research since I am an engineer and I also have to do a TON of research going through grad school as well. You also say that the Bush tax cuts have a lot to do with this, NO! The 53 percent of people not paying taxes while I get jammed is most of the problem but what is the solution? MORE TAXES!? REALLY? How about we get people like Jeffrey Immelt and Timmy Geitner to start paying their taxes, that would be a great start.

Posted by: indyusmc | July 24, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

@simonpeter, I don’t think when the debt ceiling was raised when BUSH was in office that OVER HALF of America was screaming NOT TO RAISE IT. I voted for Obama, I did not wanted it raised under BUSH, I do not want it raised under Obama. We have to stop spending…. JUST A FACT!

Posted by: ajax659 | July 24, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

evilbunnies wrote: “Yeah, yeah, most countries don’t have a debt ceiling…zimbabwe, venzuelea, Greece..”
Um, nice cherrypicking. Try NO major industrialized country besides tiny Denmark has a “debt ceiling”.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

“You also say that the Bush tax cuts have a lot to do with this, NO! ”
Yes. If you’re a researcher as you say, you can read charts. The Bush tax cuts combined with two unfunded wars have contributed about half the current debt.
Tax revenue as percentage of GDP is at an all time low of 15%. For most of the past half century it has been 19-20%.
You can’t tackle the debt problem without tackling BOTH spending and revenue. A balanced approach is the only thing that will work.

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

What is wrong with the USA leadership.Why don’t you pay into Social Secuity like the rest of the working U.S. citizens,if you did you wouldn’t be so quick to cut our retirement we worked for all our lives,and the medicare that is needed more as we age.So all you great U.S. leaders start paying social secuity .Quit taking from the people who has made America by paying in their social security.How dare you call it ENTITLEMENT,it is ours we woked and paid for it everyday.Wake up.

Posted by: Barbara | July 24, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“How about we get people like Jeffrey Immelt and Timmy Geitner to start paying their taxes”…I would not go there INDYUSMC, that would be raising taxes and John Boehner says that is not what the American people want. I don’t think you want John Boehner calling you un-American, do you?

Posted by: sameagain | July 24, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

NO,NO,NO SAMEAGAIN! It is actually getting them to PAY their taxes. Oh, I forgot, those are P-BO’s buddies and they’re exempt. Sorry for being so confused. I’ll try not to let that happen again.

Posted by: indyusmc | July 24, 2011, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Ok, that’s what I figured. Good man and a darn good Marine too I’ll bet. Bless you.
They are BO’s pals that’s for sure. Was it a loophole that they used or did they just flat out cheat, and is there a difference?

Posted by: sameagain | July 24, 2011, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

1.STOP BORROWING MONEY THROUGH THE FEDERAL RESERVE, GO DIRECTLY TO THE US TREASURY.
2.DEFAULT AND BALANCE THE BUDGET.
3. BRING OUR TROOPS HOME. THEY NEED TO STOP PROTECTING GLOBALISTS ASSETS AROUND THE WORLD.
4. LET THE DOLLAR DROP AGAINST OTHER CURRENCIES, IT WILL MAKE US MADE PRODUCTS MORE EXPORTABLE.

Posted by: Thomas Oldenburg | July 24, 2011, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Obama should not sign anything, pay the poor and social security recipients, the Military and Disabled. After all who is going to suffer. The rich who have their money in
Wall street. And of coarse his FAT CAT
donors. I am so sick of the way everything
behind closed doors, what happened to
the most transparent White House ever.

Posted by: deadwrestler | July 24, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

There is no debate, America has responsibilities and we must honor them no matter what the cost. The party of “NO” must be minimized!

Posted by: Rudy Gonzales | July 24, 2011, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

So, lets see if I get this….
The House passes Ryan’s budget deal, sends it to the
Senate for discussion and Reid and the dems reject it, and have nothing
of their own.
Then The House passes Cap-Cut & Balance with a bi-partisan vote,
sends it to the Senate for discussion and Reid and the
dems reject it, and have nothing of their own.
Meanwhile, 0bama sits down with Boehner and tells him he wants a tax increase, with nothing of his own, at the same time that Reid trashes The House’s plan without even a debate…
NO WONDER BOEHNER WALKED…I would have too.
The Repubs are the only ones doing their jobs…don’t tell me about the “party of NO”
NO Plan
NO Clue
N0bama

Posted by: vod-k-nockers | July 24, 2011, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

The Republicans are a deceptive bunch. I get tired of hearing them bemoan spending in Washington – they spend money too. They voted for many of the spending initiatives that brought us to the current debt ceiling, and now they act like they had nothing to do with it. I agree with Boehner that America needs to get serious about spending cuts, but EVERY american need to get involved with where the cuts are made. If we leave it to the new Radical Republican party, America will feel more like Mexico.

Posted by: eric | July 24, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I’d rather have Obama sacrifice his job.

Posted by: bert | July 24, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

@cnd fox
In response to your 11:19am comment.
What kind of answer is that?
Is that all your educated mind has is to call people ignorant.
It is your job to educate the ignorant is it not?
I understand what default means but as I stated many times I don’t think the US needs to default without a debt ceiling increase.
I hardly trust the credit rating agencies anyway. Remember Enron & Worldcom.
How will raising the debt ceiling make the poor people you reference better off?
You want higher taxes to, in theory, force companies to invest and hire, in order to avoid taxes. I understand the logic but the problem is THERE IS NO LONGER ENOUGH WORK. We outsourced everything. Why would a company hire someone to do nothing!
Even still, You can raise taxes, and do whatever you want without raising the debt ceiling.
The wars need to end, close foreign bases.
Entitlement reform, while necessary, should not be part of the discussion at this point.

Posted by: the truth | July 24, 2011, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

INDYUSMC | JUL 24, 2011 12:30:07 PM – Americans appreciate your service. My husband served around the time you did; I suspect you and I are around the same age, meaning we both lived through 20th Century Presidents since Eisenhower. My father was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross. We have graduate educations and are Progressives.
So let’s get past the idea that serving in the military or a person’s age automatically provides superior insight over “libs” who need to shut their “pieholes”.
When Obama took office, the national debt equaled $10.63 trillion. According to the Treasury web site, it is currently around $14.34 trillion. When GW Bush took office, the debt was at $5.7 trillion – eight years later when GW Bush left office, the debt was at $10.63 trillion. Those are facts.
And it’s also a fact that today’s $14 trillion national debt is NOT because of Obama’s “spending”. Much of that increase is due to the large amount of interest America must pay annually on the $FIVE trillion accumulated over the past decade.
The largest contributions to our national debt today is due to the massive borrowing used to finance two preemptive wars, AND reduced tax revenues (due to the Bush era tax cuts) + lower contributions (due to high unemployment triggered by the 2007 Recession).
In short, the debt was caused by BOTH spending AND loss of revenues. To fix that today, cutting government programs alone won’t pay for all that borrowing.
And I am not alone in presenting the facts about Bush era tax cuts contributing to our escalating debt. Since you have an open mind to doing a ton of research, simply google this: “how the deficit got this big”.
One thing you and I do agree on, however. Jeffrey Immelt and Timmy Geitner – also President Obama – need to start paying their more in taxes, along with everyone else whose income skyrocketed due to tax advantages over the last decade while the Middle Class stagnated.

Posted by: green.goddess | July 24, 2011, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

how is it the bigest lyers and con artest are running our goverment its like a soap opera they dont care they have jobs and free healthcare when most of them should be locked up

Posted by: matermerrsh | July 24, 2011, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I guess if the community organizer was out of there we might have some sort of a deal.

Posted by: flaguyxx | July 24, 2011, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

In my opinion John Boehner is either caught up in his own over inflated of himself, so intoxicated by his new found “power” as to have lost sight of his responsibilities as an elected representitive to do what is best for the people of this country, or he perhaps believes he is gaining something politically.
It seems that any time a possible agreement is close then he walks out like a child quitting a game if he can’t get his way. Is this a way, in his mind, to make the President look ineffective? I think it only makes him look like a fool. By the way has anyone with the resources to do so looked into who may be gaining either monitarilly on politically from these unreasonable delays.

Posted by: Carl | July 24, 2011, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I hope you all took your money out of the market Friday. I’m sure Boehner, McConnell and Canter, with all the rest of the rich took theirs out. Don’t cave Obama there’s going to be more holp coming in 2012!!!!!!

Posted by: Ron | July 24, 2011, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I THINKS THEY SHOULD LEAVE THE POOR PEOPLE ALONE. WE CAN NOT MAKE IT NOW THEY NEED TO GO AFTER THE RICH PEOPLE AND LEAVE US POOR PEOPLE ALONE WE DO NOT GET THAT MUCH MONEY NOW YOU ALREADY TOOK MONEY AWAY FROM US FOR THE LAST 4 YEARS I THINK THATS SHOULD BE ALL FROM THE POOR PEOPLE

Posted by: marcella lazareanu | July 24, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA – Congressmen swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but now seek to do otherwise. They prefer to change the Constitution (i.e. “Cut, Cap & Balance” bill), rather than follow it. To Republicans, policies that benefit middle-class and poor Americans, are called “entitlements”. But those policies which benefit the rich and powerful are called “prosperity” by them. President Obama, consider the following in the event of an August 3rd default: 1) ORDER THE GSA TO CLOSE OPERATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL GYM, END FREE MEDICAL SERVICES & OTHER PERKS, and STOP OR DELAY SALARY TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. It is offensive that during a possible federal default, seniors would have to choose between food and medicine, while Congressmen enjoy air conditioning. 2) ENFORCE ALL FEDERAL TAXATION POWERS. No tax waivers or extensions while the Debt Ceiling issue is unresolved. And 3) The U.S. Treasury should aggressively collect money from those States that should have sent it anyway to the federal government. For example, Alabama still, in 2011, collects a tax for Confederate veterans. The right to raise revenues was retained by the federal government when the Civil War ended IN 1865. The last Confederate soldier in Alabama died 80 years ago. Duhh!!! A “Confederate” tax is offensive on so many levels; especially when Senator Jeff Sessions and Alabama’s U.S. representatives would rather America default on its debts, than raise revenues. Lastly, “SPENDING CUTS” is a matter of definition, and by whom. A fair “spending cut”, for example, would be stopping the private use of the nation’s airspace during a fiscal shutdown. The FAA and NTSB are federal resources that should not be used to accommodate non-commercial aircraft in times of fiscal crisis. Another fair “spending cut” is to collect taxes from dead-beat businesses. The U.S. can raise money NOW from corporate tax cheats and wealthy scofflaws by making them pay taxes that THEY OWE TODAY. President Obama, push to raise the Debt Ceiling in a fair and balanced manner. The Founding Fathers never sought to re-create feudalism, or form a “Crumbs from the Table” system that the GOP now seek to impose on the nation. “CRUMBS FROM THE TABLE” only exists as an economic choice for those individuals who have no greater expectations. Americans are not dogs. Americans do not support this approach because it has never worked here. And please, President Obama, continue to follow the U.S. Constitution as it currently is. American voters have your back. THANK YOU.

Posted by: I-Vote | July 24, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

O’bammys altar of NO! 0′bammy and his dems have had over SIX years to present a budget, but because the demos had a majority, ANY budget they passed would have the dems and 0′bammy as SOLE OWNERS and if ANYTHING went WRONG…..they would be the party blamed. THAT is the REAL “CAN” that got “KICKED DOWN THE ROAD! 0′bammy and his dems are the most irresponsible group of spoiled brats that EVER were elected!

Posted by: shugland | July 24, 2011, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I think next time Boehner talks to the American people . He should not look like he was on a week long drinking binge. The green tie was a little tacky also. The problem was there way before Obama took office. The oil companies profits billions who needs all that money. As my dad once said the rich get richer, and who cares about the rest.

Posted by: american pride | July 25, 2011, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

I KNOW THAT WHEN WE ELECT A SENATOR OR A REPRESENTIVE TO GOVERN OUR AREAS OF RESIDENT, WE EXPECT THOSE PEOPLE TO DO THIER JOB! SINCE THEY AREN’T DOING IT JUST FIGHTING THE GOOD OLE BOY WAY. WE COULD SETTLE THIS IN A HEART BEAT! JUST STOP PAYING ANY OF THEM THAT ARE NOT DOING AS THE PEOPLE WISH! THIS ISN’T A CONTEST BUT OUR LIVES. AMEN!!

Posted by: betty j | July 26, 2011, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.