Jul 22, 2011 5:59am

Postal Service Pushes To End Saturday Delivery

gty mailman mw 110721 wb Postal Service Pushes To End Saturday Delivery

ABC News' Amy Bingham reports:

America’s second-largest employer is in dire straits and it’s all the Internet’s fault.

The U.S. Postal Service is facing an $8.3 billion budget shortfall this year, in large part because of losing almost half of its first class mail to online bill pay and email communication. 

After laying off 110,000 employees and cutting $12 billion over the past four years, the service is now looking to end mail delivery on Saturdays, a move it said would save $3.1 billion per year.

“That’s savings that we desperately need,” said U.S. Postal Service spokesman David Partenheimer. “It’s not the only thing we need to do to get out of the financial hole but it is very important.”

According to a 2009 Gallup Poll 66 percent of Americans are OK with the postal service cutting mail delivery on Saturdays, but far fewer support paying more for their mail.

Just 38 percent of respondents were in favor of raising stamp prices and less than half, or 48 percent supported pumping tax revenues into the mail system. 

But even within the postal system, there is disagreement over whether a five-day delivery system will actually solve the problem. Despite not delivering mail, post offices would stay open, express or overnight mail would still be delivered and P.O. boxes would still receive mail.

The Postal Regulatory Commission, a president-appointed agency that oversees the Postal Services’ operations to ensure it doesn’t abuse its monopoly, estimated that cutting a delivery day would take three years to fully implement and would only save $1.7 billion per year thereafter.

“The key factor is that the Postal Service thinks it can take all the mail that it would otherwise deliver on Saturday and deliver it on Monday with no extra cost,” said regulatory commission chairman Ruth Goldway. “When we look at the operations it just can’t happen.”

Despite not receiving any taxpayer money, the USPS is technically a government agency, so in order to eliminate a delivery day it has to get Congressional approval. Partenheimer said it has been trying to get approval since 2009, but this is the first year any legislation has been introduced.

While a shortened delivery schedule would help close the budget gap, both Partenheimer and Goldway said the real issue is the $5.5 billion the Postal Service has to pay every year into a fund for the health benefits of its future retirees.

“That’s the real structural problem for the Postal Service right now,” Goldway said.

Goldway said without the retiree fund payments, which were mandated starting in 2006, the mail service would be posting profits.

“If the Postal Service hadn’t had to pay this over the past six years, as of 2010 it would have ended with $1 billion surplus and still have $12 billion to 13 billion left to borrow from borrowing fund,” Goldway said. “Instead, at the end of 2011 it will end up with no cash and an empty borrowing fund.”

As it stands now, USPS will not be able to make the payment by its September due date, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe told USA Today on Wednesday.

"On September 20th, I won't be able to pay my bills," Donahoe said.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R- Calif., the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, introduced a bill that would that would create a congressionally-appointed commission to take over the Postal Service if it did, in fact, miss the payment. Issa’s spokesman Ali Ahmad said the goal of the commission would be to get the Postal Service back in the black.

“For an institution which is hemorrhaging money and is seeing a serious decline in demands for their products… it makes perfect sense because taxpayers are going to be on the hook for this,” Ahmad said.

A member of the Oversight Committee Staff said the large retiree health program payments are necessary because without a stockpile of funds, USPS will face the same problem Social Security is now struggling with. As revenues continue to drop, it will have to pay out more in health benefits than it is taking in.

If USPS cannot pay for its employees health care costs during retirement, that burden will fall to the federal government, the staffer said.

If Issa’s bill passes, his commission will not be about "helping the Postal Service avoid obligations,” like the retiree pre-payments,  but will instead find ways to cut costs so the $5.5 billion retirement fund payments can continue, the committee staffer said.

“Unless there is real structural reform, the Postal Service won’t be here in two years, let alone 10,” the staffer said. “They haven’t been able to reduce expenses to meet the fact that 20 percent of mail volume is gone and, frankly, is not coming back.”

User Comments

The postal unions are the problem. There are multiple unions and they put the auto worker unions to shame when it comes to benefits. Start with cutting saturday’s, then benefits, cut the cost of junk mail, then close down as any normal business would do. UPS and FedEx have demonstrated that you can have a profitable mail delivery service.

Posted by: bobbaa | July 22, 2011, 6:12 am 6:12 am

Fed Ex and USP have demonstrated when you have lobby firms that can donate money to politicians you can make money. Politicians like Rep. Darrell Issa, R- Calif.,require the Post Service to deliver packages door to door for those great examples of capitalism at a below market price. Let’s see how much your mailing costs go up when that stops. And by the way why don’t you stop trying to blame works for asking for a fair wage for a fair days work.

Posted by: rdarkchild | July 22, 2011, 7:18 am 7:18 am

The answer to this problem needs to be undertaken in a way to provide ‘structural change’ in the system WITHOUT bashing the workers, the union etc. These are dedicated middle class people – who based on my personal experience with my local office – do an OUTSTANDING JOB! Let’s see if Darrell Issa can accopmplish that without ‘demonizing’ and ‘destroying the lives’ of a solid part of our fellow middle class workers.

Posted by: CND FOX | July 22, 2011, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Fed Ex and USP do not do house to house daily delivery of personal mail. The US Postal Service has been around since Benjamin Franklin (and other services before).
The halting of Saturday delivery works for businesses, but not for the everyday public. In addition, the postal carrier is salaried, so there will not be a cost savings in that arena, rightfully so.
Unions are also a part of the American culture which were needed to prevent the heads of companies from mistreating and misusing employees (some have gone a bit overboard lately, corporations are now reaping what they sowed).
I would not want to go out in knee deep snow, slick ice, driving rain, scorching heat, not have two consecutive days off, worry about barking and biting animals, drug infested neighborhoods, and rude people who think a postal carriers job is easier than their job; postal carriers and clerk put up with this and more.

Posted by: EPSE | July 22, 2011, 8:13 am 8:13 am

bobbaa- you are absolutely right…my husband worked for jUSPS for 5 years and some of the foolishness he told me about UNBELIEVABLE. He even had grievances filed against him (he was maintenance and janitorial) because he was doing things that were somebobdy else’s job – not getting done. The Unions have not only ruined the USPS but the country…Good for their time but now waaaay too out of control.

Posted by: mj | July 22, 2011, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Start charging $1 to deliver a credit card application. That would be at least $25 a month just to my house. Times how many homes in the US?

Posted by: oonogil | July 22, 2011, 8:26 am 8:26 am

BTW – USPS employees make good money overall…although the carriers have a much rougher time what with letter counts and time studies…

Posted by: mj | July 22, 2011, 8:28 am 8:28 am

While we’re on the subject. Let’s give three cheers to the Post Office.
They move tons of mail every day and rarely make a mistake.
Congress does almost nothing and they rarely get anything right.
Maybe we should let the post office run the rest of the government.

Posted by: oonogil | July 22, 2011, 8:29 am 8:29 am

I vote for eliminating my Wednesday mail and all that crap that comes with it. Every Wednesday I get slammed with paper ads, credit cards apps, etc and all of it goes right into the waste bin. Keep it and save the costs of coming to my house.

Posted by: James | July 22, 2011, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Ending saturday delivery will NOT fix the Post Offices problems, and comparing international companies like Fed Ex and UPS, who are THRIVING in China and other countries, to the USPS is rather silly. Of course, I vehemently oppose ANY changes, as do most people who live in rural areas, because Fed Ex and UPS do not ship out here. They contract the USPS to do it, and even then, it’s over twice the cost. The fact remains the USPS is the highest rated in terms of price, shipping times, and shipping accuracy. They deliver 10x the amount of mail UPS does, with twice the workers. So who’s really more efficient? You want to solve the problem? Get rid of the needless management. Take a look at USPS’ org chart for yourself. Stop trying to take away the jobs, and the hours of people who are actually doing the work, those people who are in the weather, who are on the side of the road dealing with the idiot drivers of the world, and who are actually representing the USPS on a daily basis.

Posted by: TheSmartGuy | July 22, 2011, 8:37 am 8:37 am

oonogil, I like the way you think!

Posted by: mal2cats | July 22, 2011, 8:39 am 8:39 am

I think we should eliminate the postal service altogether and vendor out the mail delivery to some other company possible like UPS.

Posted by: homer | July 22, 2011, 8:40 am 8:40 am

We really need to turn over our health system to a bunch of bureaucrats?They run the postal system so well and the Federal government always has a balanced budget. What are we thinking? Time to vote out the old and bring in the new.

Posted by: Freedom | July 22, 2011, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Stop house to house delivery and set up cluster boxes at the end of the street instead. Since I moved from a rural area, I’ve always gotten my mail at a cluster box at the end of the street, although I notice that a lot of streets in my town still have a mailbox parked at the curb in front of every house. Even with the cost of equipment and installation, they would save money in the long run on gas and vehicle maintenance.

Posted by: hulettwyo | July 22, 2011, 8:47 am 8:47 am

United States Postal Service, year 2020: Delivery 8:00am – 11:30am, Wednesday only. First class stamp, $3.99

Posted by: Aaron | July 22, 2011, 8:52 am 8:52 am

If not for all the junk mail, the post office would not be making any money. My 3-5 stamps every 2 weeks just can’t compete. So I say bump up the 3rd class mail rate slightly, bump up the 1st class stamp slightly,put a freeze on the contract-written bonuses the executives get and keep Saturday pick-up/delivery service.
also, the unions need to relax some of their stricter working rules. We are supposed to be in the union together, not pigeon-holed like managers in cubicles. Look how badly that is working out.

Posted by: Wayne | July 22, 2011, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Bobba– You have no idea what you are talking about-Healthcare co-pays are deducted out of every check-BCBS covers nothing for Dental-There is a $1500.00 deductible-There is little to no prescription coverage-oh and by the way UPS and FedEx do NOT deliver mail-they deliver PACKAGES

Posted by: Michigan | July 22, 2011, 8:58 am 8:58 am

The post office only wants its 76 billion back that it over paid congress through their civil service retirement plan. You know the one? It pays congress their retirement… Don’t do away with Saturday delivery. It will only serve to harm the small businesses that are open and need their mail on weekends. Many times, they can’t run across town to get thir mail 6 days a week at a post office box. Thats what Postal Management wants… Not good for the economy, not good for the future.

Posted by: lp | July 22, 2011, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Eliminating Saturday delivery will in-fact support a leaner Postal Service. One of six Letter Carrier positions will no longer be needed. Those employees losing their positions could be placed elsewhere within the organization as Clerks or Mail Handlers in Plants, or maintain a Carrier postion IF HQ throws a tasty bone to the highest-seniority employees to encourage retirement. Eliminating one delivery day isn’t an option, it’s a MUST if the Postal Service is to exist without dipping into the pockets of taxpayers.

Posted by: Inside_Looking_Out | July 22, 2011, 9:00 am 9:00 am

bobbaa wrote: “The postal unions are the problem…UPS and FedEx have demonstrated that you can have a profitable mail delivery service.” +++++ The U.S. Post Office has NOT, repeat NOT, spent a dime of taxpayers money in nearly half a century. And if you want something shipped to you, the CHEAPEST, FASTEST way to do it for several years has been the U.S. Postal Service. So how are the unions the problem? Are you one of those people who believe the Middle Class should be reduced to serfs while the rich get richer? It’s not that the public workers get such great benefits – I have cousinswith high school educations retired from companies Conoco-Phillips and Otis Elevator that have better pensions than my teacher’s pension. It’s that the economy has been rigged to cheat most private workers and to funnel 24% of all income to the top 1% compared to 9% pre-Reagan.

Posted by: The_Mick | July 22, 2011, 9:29 am 9:29 am

I switched to on-line bill pay and e-bills about seven years ago after the post office delivered my bank statement to someone else!

Posted by: MNtaxpayer | July 22, 2011, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Stop talking about it and just do it already. I don’t want mail coming on Saturdays anyhow and neither do most people I know. Much of the time you’re not around and it just sits in the box waiting to get stolen. Please stop delivering on Saturdays, it’s not a service.

Posted by: pgd | July 22, 2011, 9:43 am 9:43 am

A good deal of the mail I get is bulk bulk mail, like shopping flyers, catalogs, and junk mail. Since most of the daily mail consists of that sort of item raising the postage rates for those should add a good deal of money to the USPS revenue, especially as FedEx and UPS won’t deliver them. As to cutting out a day of service, make it Mondays. Many holidays fall on Monday anyway so people and businesses are used to it and I’m actually home on Saturday to sign for things that require a signature.

Posted by: Publius | July 22, 2011, 9:51 am 9:51 am

No brainer. . . end saturday delievery and double the rate for junk mail

Posted by: Jim | July 22, 2011, 10:06 am 10:06 am

This is so dumb. The reason they are having financial troubles is because their employees are grossly overpaid. 50,000 a year to stick envelopes into s slot? Cut wages. Cut wages. Cut wages. Cut wages.

Posted by: RJ | July 22, 2011, 10:25 am 10:25 am

The Postal Service undertook a monsterous building program over the past decade, to the extent that every village in America got a brand new Post Office and the landscape is dotted with thirty thousand square foot “sorting centers”. This was irresponsible to the extreme, and WE paid for it with ever increasing postal rates and now drastic reductions in service. And the same idiots who perpetrated it are still sitting proud in Washington at Postal Headquarters.

Posted by: AJ | July 22, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Have the postal worker be oart of the S/S plan like other Americans. Why do they and Congress need a seperate plan?

Posted by: Bob/46 | July 22, 2011, 10:42 am 10:42 am

First – stop Saturday delivery, only a $1.7 billion savings suits me just fine. Second – Disband the union and equalize benefits to those of the private sector. Third – Forget about class rates, everyone pays the same for delivery – including all the junk mail. Fourth – employees behind the counter have to learn to move faster to get customers in and out of lines. This will buy a few more years before innovation is needed.

Posted by: Give me a Break | July 22, 2011, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Apparently, they need to do something that would save them another $8 billion per year. If you can’t keep raising the price of postage whenever you feel like, you have to eat your peas and cut where the expenses are the highest. We all know where those are.

Posted by: s | July 22, 2011, 11:10 am 11:10 am

First of all ABC was wrong. The Postal Service has not laid off 110,000 workers, and I have not heard of anyone being laid off. People need to get the facts straight. I carried mail for 23 years and it is not as easy as people think, and Goldway doesn’t have a clue how the system works. And for the record Postal Employees are NOT salaried unless you are in management.

Posted by: larry | July 22, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am

US Postal Services DOES NOT RUN ON TAXPAYER MONEY! They run on the sales they make.

Posted by: cpjohn1 | July 22, 2011, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Why not start by closing all non-delivering post offices? In the rural county I grew up in, every village has its own post office – but only the post office in the main town delivers.

Posted by: Linda | July 22, 2011, 11:31 am 11:31 am

“For an institution which is hemorrhaging money and is seeing a serious decline in demands for their products… it makes perfect sense because taxpayers are going to be on the hook for this,” Ahmad said.

Posted by: MNtaxpayer | July 22, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am

IMO, cutting Saturday delivery would be fine. I’ve heard the argument that seniors and others waiting on an SS check would be forced to wait longer, when for many they barely make it through the month as it is, but currently, if the 3rd falls on a SUNDAY, the checks go out on the previous FRIDAY, and the same policy would most likely apply if Sat. delivery was eliminated. If anything, they’d get their checks SOONER some months.
And yes, RAISE the price of a stamp SIGNIFICANTLY already. Enough with the few cents every few years silliness. Bump it up to .75 or even $1. It would still be a BARGAIN for the service received, and even for those (like the seniors on fixed income) who rely on the mail to pay bills, the additional cost would not be more than a few bucks a month, if that.
Someone mentioned “cutting out the junk mail”…that is one of their largest revenue streams, actually…they get PAID to deliver that stuff. If anything, they should raise the rates to deliver it to reflect their rising costs.
I am a big supporter of the US postal service and of the workers being paid a living wage. Many seem to forget that not only has this country had a national postal service since virtually our begining, but there are still MANY who rely on it (private, for-profit services are much more costly and not everyone HAS internet, believe it or not).
I can count on one hand (on only a few fingers, actually) the times in my LIFE when the US Postal Service has failed to get something to me or to where-ever I sent it in a timely manner.
The US Postal Service was never meant to be a for-profit enterprise, being more of a public service, but it SHOULD be able to break even and STILL deliver the cheapest service.

Posted by: TheRealRaven | July 22, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am

They should have done this a few years ago. We’ll live.

Posted by: maemobly | July 22, 2011, 11:48 am 11:48 am

“Despite not receiving any taxpayer money…” – That’s an outright lie. The PO gets tons of taxpayer money, directly and indirectly. The Federal budget has a large chunk allotted for them and the PO doesn’t pay taxes, registration fees for their vehicles, and so on.
And they still lose money hand over fist.
The Post Office is slow, ineffective, inefficient, incapable of competing on a level playing field and a money hole. They really are a government agency after all!

Posted by: Erik | July 22, 2011, 11:49 am 11:49 am

USPS “Here’s the truth. In 1971, Congress reorganized the Postal Service, making it an independent agency of the executive branch operating as a commercial entity. Today, the Postal Service relies on the sale of postage, mail products and services for its revenue.
A small annual appropriation from Congress reimburses the Postal Service for free mail for the blind and absentee-ballot mailing for overseas military personnel. Otherwise, the Postal Service has not received taxpayer funds to support its operations since 1982. In fact, though the Postal Service often is described as “quasi-governmental,” it’s required by law to cover its costs.”

Posted by: genhrules | July 22, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

What can you expect with all the highly paid managers they are drowning in. No matter how many times the raise the postage rates, they are always in the red. Just like our government with the tax and spend Democrats and Obama spending like a compulsive HSN shopper.
It’s case of two many chiefs and not enough Indians at the USPS.

Posted by: RevTech | July 22, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Did you know that Postal workers get paid overtime after 8 hrs of work not after 40hrs of work? Plus some carriers will file a grievance if they don’t get the route they want. How much money is wasted there? I don’t get mail delivered to my house every day. I was told to call and complain but I don’t care. If you can’t go two days without getting mail, well deal with it.

Posted by: Cut the service | July 22, 2011, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Contrary to what this article says, the post office’s problems are not the fault of the Internet. If the post office continues to raise rates, it will raise itself out of existence. Now here’s a radical concept–why don’t they LOWER rates??? Businesses that are trying to generate customers always do that. But everytime the post office raises their rates, I try to find other ways to send mail, like the Internet.

Posted by: Roscoe Chait | July 22, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

The USPS has never laid off a single employee in its 40 year history. The reduction was through attrition and early retirements. In fact, there just isn’t anyone to be laid off, at least in my facility. If someone has to call in sick, there is great turmoil in trying to get the job done.
I just really like how the first comment, off the bat, blames the Unions for the troubles. FYI, in the new contract, the APWU agreed to what amounts to a two year wage freeze. Although the total increase is 3.5% over the life of the contract. The first is 1% startin in November 2012. All COLA for 2011 has been completely waived and will never be paid, that is a wage reduction. Cola for 2012 will not be paid until 2013, along with the 2013 COLA. APWU also agreed to have the workers assume a greater share of our Health Insurance Premiums, another reduction in disposable income.
UPS and FedEx are rpofitable, no doubt. But, they are not required by law to deliver to every address across the country and even across the ocean. They can slap on a surcharge to cover rising fuel costs as well. USPS has to figure out how to absorb those added costs without any way to instantly generate new revenue. Besides, when UPS or FedEx have packages that are to be delivered to an area they don’t want to service, who do you think they hand it off to. That’s right, the USPS because we HAVE to go there.
So, the dirty, filthy, rotten, greedy Postal Unions aren’t giving anything back but we are deferring and waiving items that add to our income and agreeing to pay more towards benefits that subtract from our income.
Sounds like some sharing of the pain to me.

Posted by: Randy F | July 22, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Congress tells USPS they are a business and then when they want to curb delivery days or close unprofitable post offices they block it and say it’s a government service. So which is it?

Posted by: Big d | July 22, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

It is not the union managers break the contract costing lots of money yearly along with paying out lots of overtime to carriers and clerks due to short staffing offices I work in a small office with 16 routes and we have two managers making 70 plus thousand a year that do pretty much nothing after the two hours the mail comes into and to the street yet they cannot even make there own decisions without getting permission from other managers in district including ordering hand sanitized and toilet paper there really just puppets

Posted by: Mailboy | July 22, 2011, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Randy F…I hear you. Our local office is extremely well run (actually any office in other areas I have been in are too). You can thank the GOP and dumbed down tea party for all the uninformed, negative, government bashing comments that appear on this subject and that appear regularly on these forums. Ignorance, negativity, and tearing things down seems to be their main “claims to fame”. And eventually it will cause their movement to destroy itself.

Posted by: CND FOX | July 22, 2011, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Just like Borders Books and Block Buster the business model of the Postal System is out of date. It wasn’t the Unions but technology which has done them in.

Posted by: Voice_Reason | July 22, 2011, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Packages can be delivered privately while information transfer has moved to the internet. Since the President wants high-speed internet in all areas of the country this can be the justification for elimination of the US Postal System.

Posted by: Voice_Reason | July 22, 2011, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

As a rural carrier for 28 years, I can attest to the fact that the postal service is on its way down the drain. I,ve worked with many post masters over the years who all come in late on Mondays and leave early on Fridays. We have a supervisor who admitted { when she was training to be supr.} that her carrier job was too dificult to continue. Management evaluates our mail volume in the summer when volumes are down, and then complains when hours are up during heavy volume times like christmas. When I started at the post office, in 1983, I had 450 deliveries and got 48hrs. pay. As of today, Ihave 704 deliveries and get 46hrs. pay. Our next evaluation is in september. We are expecting to lose up to 3-5 hrs. pay. However, to get rid of more mail routes, management will add to each route so as to regain the lost hours. Therefore I will probably end up with 800 deliveries for 46hrs pay. Our workload continues to get heavier by the year while managements only job is to make the numbers look good to their supervisors. There are too many people in the Postal Service whos only job is that of a convience to the manager above them. They contribute nothing to increase revenue. Its time that the That the POSTMASTER GENERAL listened the lowest level workers, ie: carriers, clerks, and mailhandlers, instead of all the puppets on a string who say anything to get a pat on the back.. Thank you.

Posted by: donniemac | July 22, 2011, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

There is direct deposits for employers and Social Security. There are automatic and internet bill payments with Bills viewed online. Email and texting have eliminated personal snail mail. Magazines and newspapers are going online and can be loaded to reading devices! All that is left is junk mail!

Posted by: Voice_Reason | July 22, 2011, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

here we go again. The postal braintrust has again found a way to raise us from the gates of hell, and once again we will lose more money than the previous year. Management always said that we need pay for performance bonuses to keep the best possible people in charge. After losing 5.3 billion last year and 8.3 this year, I can not imagine where we would be if we did not retain these geniuses. Thank god they decided to suspend this hand out to the powers that be.

Posted by: graciesyd | July 22, 2011, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Hold it!!! The post office already gets all those Monday holidays off so getting Saturdays off would give them MANY 3 day weekends off so that when Tuesday came around they would be overloaded and we would not get delivery until dark.

Posted by: Bob | July 22, 2011, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

The Post Office did not lose any money. Expenses have outpaced income, and that money is called a deficit. The P.O. has to pay billions of dollars to pre-fund FUTURE health care benefits to the tune of 5.5 bilion dollars per year. They cannot raise prices or make changes like a regular business without Congressional approval. I would challenge any business to survive under these circumstances.

Posted by: James | July 22, 2011, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

If California would get it’s act together I would not mind

Posted by: Pam Richardson | July 23, 2011, 11:07 am 11:07 am

I used to work for the federal government and every year when we received the insurance books from the various companies, we would cringe at the cost of out of pocket that we had to pay vs what the postal employees paid for the same insurance. The last that I heard, it wasn’t any difference. That is ridiculous. Especially since most postal workers made more an hour than I did and still do. Does that mean that the postal employees pay less for their health insurance than a soldier? YES! and that isn’t right, our service personnel need the same or better than postal workers…

Posted by: Gail | July 23, 2011, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Absolutely mail should stop on Saturday… It is a waste, and trust me, I can wait until the following monday, for that one piece of junk mail…

Posted by: justforfacebook20101 | July 23, 2011, 11:25 am 11:25 am

If the truth is told there is not one good business reason for NOT eleminating Saturday delivery AND closing all other past office business on Saturdays. NO further postal increases should even be an option or an easy Fix!!!

Posted by: warren cole | July 23, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

What other large company has to put up
with a bunch of know-nothing geniuses
telling them how to run their business?
To this day the USPS cannot sell rural mail boxes because a few pols think that doing so would would be unfair to
mom-and-pop stores like WalMart. They
have to get approval for any new products (and usually don’t receive it). They need permission from
Congress to use the pension surplus
($70 billion) to pay off the health
care pre-funding requirement ($35 billion). They cannot even get certain
facts of their case into news stories.
(snipped out by Murdoch’s minions?).
Please get off their backs.

Posted by: Aldrich617 | July 23, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Mr. POSTMASTERGENERAL: Our postmaster constantly turns lights and fans off in our restrooms to save money, and as a lowly carrier, I would think it more economical to downsize the number of vice-presidents from the current 34. Yes 34……..! I can not imagine coming up with the titles for all these executives.

Posted by: graciesyd | July 23, 2011, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

save the postal service? here’s how.. eliminate saturday delivery just in fuel costs of parking a 100,000 vehicles for one day would be huge second,no more door to door delivery cluster boxes on the street corners you would eliminate 10 percent of the carriers.

Posted by: vern | July 23, 2011, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Regardless of how much business the
internet free-loaders siphon off from
the USPS, it would seem prudent to
keep it in good working order as a
National Security asset. Experts tell
us that it is quite likely that major
cyber-attacks will seriously disrupt
all internet based message systems in
the near future, so it would be prudent
to have an emergency gound delivery
system in place.
Some upgades in USPS equipment might be necessary for it to fulfill this Security function, and it is only fair that the Internet should be taxed to provide the funds. This tax, if properly
implemented, would also SAVE JOBS.

Posted by: Aldrich617 | July 23, 2011, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Before I use FedEX or UPS I for sure use USPS. My overnighted Urgend Marked Credit Cards deliverd by UPS ended up on the staircase for everyone to see and steal. My uniform shirts (not delivert with FedEx) never arrived and on top of it their sad i had them. After theatening with the Police there finally paid for the Shirts. Their never ring the doorbell and their doortags are everything else but not correctly filled out. Who is in fould? I can tell you. We are and companys like T-Mobile and LaneBryant who charge you when you want your own bill in writing to pay the money you owe. We alsway need to have the newest items and do not think about the impact it has. Bookreaders nice but do you think about all the jobs lost? Printing, Bookstores, Salespeople. Selfcheckout nice but you just destroyed the job on the register. All middleclass job dissepear. Not everyone can be a Doctor or a Computerprogramer. We are our worst enemy. And besides that, If you walked 25 year thrue to heat, rainstorm, snow, ice, get chased and bitten by dogs. Walking in areas i would not even walk at daytime. You deserve your pension. I am not a postal worker but I thank you for your service and doesent matter what I make, I will not be angry about your pension.

Posted by: stefanie | July 24, 2011, 10:34 am 10:34 am

If they are a BUSINESS, they need to learn about CUSTOMER SERVICE. Instead, they are all about enforcing vague and highly interpretive rules, designed by people who have never performed the jobs they are creating rules for. If you ask 5 postal clerks with the same job the same question, how many answers do you get? SIX, because someone will change their mind. Higher ups claim all post offices handle issues identically, but that is absolutely untrue. Congress needs to step in, CLEAN OUT management, break the unions, and make it A REAL BUSINESS. One that would go out of business if it can’t make a profit.

Posted by: Pissedat Postal | July 24, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Time to take the government out of mail delivery. Anything they touch winds up with money issues!

Posted by: Kathy M. | July 24, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I deliver mail for 33 years. I can honestly tell you that we do not need Saturday delivery. Why ??? most businesses are close anyway.. Look at the business routes on Saturday as you leave the office for the street, all the mail is pulled down except for the businesses mail.
The union is the only ones who want Saturday delivery to continue and we know why ? Union dues ..Who do they think they are fooling ? My postal customers ? they tell me that the don’t care if they don’t get mail on Saturday.. They tell me that they can do for one day without junk mail. I was never well liked by anyone,Why ?? i speak the truth–i tell it like i see it and i don’t kiss anyone ass. Postal management hated me for 33 years. Retired now with 37 years . 4 years in the Marines. I’m free. Jose from Illinois.

Posted by: Jose | July 24, 2011, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Saturday mail should be eliminated. A large part of this country relies on rural mail delivery. Eliminating Saturday delivery would reduce rural delivery fuel costs by 16% in addition to reduced labor cost – our delivery person is a contract person. She probably would appreciate not working six days per week.

Posted by: Bob G | July 26, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am

You can not compare what FedEx and UPS does to what the USPS does. Firstly, did you know that the USPS subsidizes FedEx? The USPS pays FedEx to fly its mail around the country and the world. If not for USPS FedEx could not afford to send 3/4 to 1/2 empty planes to deliver their own packages. Also now keep in mind you are paying nearly 50% more for Fedex package deliver, but my package sent USPS is sitting next to yours for a fraction of the cost. Also UPS and FedEx does not deliver door to door, in an ever increasing ammount the USPS is FINISHING the job for UPS and FedEx. UPS and FedEx are now simply dropping off packages at the local Post Office and has the local Post Man delivering for them.
Finally, FedEx and UPS are not union jobs, meaning it is easy for FedEx and UPS to maintain profitbility, they simply lay off workers all the time, and force older more experience (ie higher paid, but better workers) out, and replace them with minimum wage people who do not care about service.

Posted by: Twain | July 26, 2011, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I agree with ending Saturday delivery and trying to cut costs. Putting cluster boxes at the end of a street sound good, unless you have elderly or disabled people who cannot get to that box. Walking to the end of your driveway or a box on your home is doable for them, but not the end of the street.
Postal employees waste time and resources just like any employee at a big company. So they need to understand that if they don’t try to make the company run more economically it could go private.

Posted by: Sue | July 26, 2011, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Do we really need daily delivery? Wouldn’t every-other day be sufficient?
Imagine the savings if half of us got mail delivery on Monday-Wednesday-Friday and the other half on Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday. Half as many staff; half as many trucks; half as much gas.

Posted by: Larry | July 26, 2011, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Aside from lower revenues due to the Internet, the additional cause for USPS’s problems is due directly to Congress. When USPS became independent decades ago, Congress required that the pro-rata portion of pensions incurred when the service was part of the US government (aka, the US Postal Department) be borne in totality by the new independent department. In other words, the government’s portion of the debt was forced upon the USPS. This has become an unsurmountable problem.
The union is not the cause of the problem, but the way Congress has played with budgets for years.
The USPS could become solvent if Congress paid the US government’s share of the pensions, which is in the billions. Of course, they will not do that, and the result is a great public service is being strangled.

Posted by: Larry92108 | July 26, 2011, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Has anyone thought about all the people that will be out of a job if they stop sat. deliveries. If they would get rid of all the managers that they don’t need that just sit around all day that would save alot of money. The problem is not sat. deliveries or the unions, or how much the actual workers get paid. The problem is the bonuses the managers get and all the managers they have, they have 3 managers that are doing the job of 1 manager, so they need to cut all the unecessary people first (managers, people that supposely are hurt and can’t do anything, and again managers) all they need is 1 manager per station and have a carrier or clerk as back up if that person is ill or something there is no need to have more than that. And when it comes to wages if you was out walking in the hot sun when it is 115 outside all day and by the end of the day you can wring the sweat out of your clothes, or you are out walking threw thigh deep snow and you have ice forming on your face then I’m pretty sure you deserve to get paid good and have good health insurance.

Posted by: tammy | August 10, 2011, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Here’s how to save BIG MONEY – There’s STILL LOTS OF MAIL TO DELIVER.
We need MAILMEN + MAILWOMEN TO GET IT TO MAILBOXES.
SUPERVISORS DO NOT GET MAIL TO MAILBOXES.
Their job is to pressure the MAILMEN + MAILWOMEN to work fast, to save money.

If the mailmen + mailwomen START GETTING PAID BY THE PIECE,
RATHER THAN BY THE HOUR, WE CAN GET RID OF:
1. OVERTIME COSTS,
2. HALF OF THE SUPERVISORS, AND
3. ALL OF THE ANGER THAT COMES WITH DELIVERING MAIL.
Mail delivering will become a wonderful job, not only to the
mailmen + mailwomen, but to the supervisors who will remain.
They can make sure all the routes have a truck + make sure
the mail goes out, take a few phone calls during midday, and
see that the trucks came back, and that the mail being mailed out
goes on the big truck.

Posted by: Great_idea | October 15, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.