By Sarah Parnass

Jul 18, 2011 8:04am

The Presidential Planner: Obama Nominates Cordray To Head Consumer Bureau

ABC News' Mary Bruce (@marykbruce) reports:

Today President Obama will announce that he is nominating former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 

Obama’s pick, which he will formally announce in the Rose Garden this afternoon, is seen as a slight to Elizabeth Warren, who first came up with the idea and helped create the agency, but whose nomination would have faced opposition in the Senate.

This week also marks the one-year anniversary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the financial regulatory oversight bill that also created the CFPB. Today President Obama will receive an update on its implementation from heads of financial regulatory agencies.

Also today, President Obama will meet with members of the Giving Pledge, including Warren Buffet and Bill and Melinda Gates, who started the pact to encourage America’s wealthiest people to donate the majority of their wealth to philanthropy. 

Finally, the president will host an education roundtable with business leaders, Education Secretary Duncan, Melody Barnes, and America’s Promise Alliance Chair Alma Powell and Founding Chair General Colin Powell.

User Comments

Obama’s idea of getting a grip on the debt is to create another government agency with more bureaucrats?
If you’re in the checkout line at the grocery store, and your bill totals more than you can afford, it’s time to pull items OUT of your shopping cart, not put more items in.

Posted by: Larry | July 18, 2011, 8:33 am 8:33 am

If Warren Buffet and Bill Gates are interested in giving,why don’t they give to the Federal government instead of advocating higher taxes for the “wealthy”.Nothing is stopping them from paying more than their current tax burden to the government.

Posted by: Nephron | July 18, 2011, 8:58 am 8:58 am

“If you’re in the checkout line at the grocery store, and your bill totals more than you can afford, it’s time to pull items OUT of your shopping cart, not put more items in.”
Larry, the problem is that you’re not reading the labels! I’m putting more stuff in my cart just by reading the labels and relying on a government check to pay for what I can’t afford. It’s really pretty easy.
Read the labels, people, we can do this!

Posted by: dave | July 18, 2011, 9:39 am 9:39 am

The consumer protection bureau is not to limit what you spend but to protect you from being taken advantage of by your credit card companies. No hidden fees by banks, or credit card companies. That is what this is all about. People complained about this for years and I hear them on Clark Howard every day..so we finally put a group together to protect the average person from being gyped and here we go ..complaining again about another agency. Look at it this way…it produces more jobs. Wake up people…this is for you not the government…it is not about grocery shopping but being taken advantage of by credit card corporations and banks.

Posted by: talmag | July 18, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am

“it produces more jobs”
“it produces more jobs for bureaucrats”
Yay, just what the doctor ordered!
“People, you need us much more than we need you!”

Posted by: dave | July 18, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Talmag,when you apply for a cedit card they send you a form detailing charges a responsibilities.It is your responsibility to educate yourself,not the government’s.there is absolutely no proof that this office will have any significant effect beyond wasting money duplicating what can already be obtained from Consumer Reports.if you are afraid of hidden fees JUST DON”T GET A CREDIT CARD!This reminds me of ATMs-you pay for the service,but anybody with any sense nevers uses an ATM because the fees are too high.Do you need the government to tell you that?

Posted by: Nephron | July 18, 2011, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Elizabeth Warren is one of those few people whose head and heart are in the right place to actually make things work better in this country for the majority of Americans. Being such a clear headed and right minded person makes her an enemy of everything the Republican party stands for; increasing the wealth and power of people like Rupert Murdoch, corporate leaders, hedge fund managers, banking and wall street welfare queens, etc. So, of course we are all short changed again because the GOP and the tea party and the rest of the right wing elite do not want what is best for the country but only what is best for themselves and their cronies. And of course there are those who are just so ill-informed and to a large degree illiterate that they cannot see how they are being manipulated to support policies that actually actually increase their and their children’s poverty and decrease any chance that they will be able to improve their own lives.

Posted by: James Twomey | July 18, 2011, 10:45 am 10:45 am

“Obama’s pick, which he will formally announce in the Rose Garden this afternoon, is seen as a slight to Elizabeth Warren”
Gotta hate this kind of reporting.
Did you ask Elizabeth Warren herself if she considers this a ‘slight’? Apparently not.
Did you cite who thinks this is a slight? No you didn’t.

Posted by: Dave | July 18, 2011, 11:14 am 11:14 am

“Being such a clear headed and right minded person makes her an enemy of everything the Republican party stands for.”
Posted by: James Twomey | Jul 18, 2011 10:45:38 AM
Republicans didn’t stop Warren’s confirmation. Democrats did.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s director requires confirmation by the SENATE. Obama didn’t nominate Warren last fall after then-Senator Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat who headed the Banking Committee, said she couldn’t win confirmation.
Democrats still hold a majority in the Senate.

Posted by: Chuck | July 18, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am

“Being such a clear headed and right minded person makes her an enemy of everything the Republican party stands for.”
Posted by: James Twomey | Jul 18, 2011 10:45:38 AM
Republicans didn’t stop Warren’s confirmation. Democrats did.
Posted by: Chuck | Jul 18, 2011 11:16:08 AM
James’ statement still holds. The reason Dodd said she couldn’t win is because the Republicans in the Senate would stonewall her nomination as a voting block.

Posted by: Dave | July 18, 2011, 11:42 am 11:42 am

“Posted by: Dave | Jul 18, 2011 11:14:18 AM”
Aw, sheesh, the other Dave, don’t be so nitpicking, it really looks bad….
Perhaps a lot of people who aren’t misogynists see it as a slight….

Posted by: dave | July 18, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am

In 2006, Every Democratic Senator, Including Barack Obama, Voted Against Raising The Debt Limit.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | July 18, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am

“In 2006, Every Democratic Senator, Including Barack Obama, Voted Against Raising The Debt Limit.”
And in 2012, Every Republican Senator, may vote against raising the debt limit. Why on earth would you think this is news, Fascist Hyena? The debt limit votes merely have to do with what party the credit card is given to at the moment. It has ZERO to do with what’s best for the country.
And in 2006, Fascist Hyena, every Democrat was RIGHT!!! Why on earth would you bring up something that makes Democrats look GOOD? Bush and the RINOs were destroying America.

Posted by: dave | July 18, 2011, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Larry, protecting our consumer rights and preventing rip-offs strengthens families and the middle-class which in turn, keeps our economy stronger.

Posted by: Lydia | July 18, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Many of us haven’t realized the depth of the crisis.
The AP reports that “the debt debate has hamstrung President Barack Obama’s ability to hit the road to campaign and raise money for his re-election bid.”
You can bet this will be settled before the 50th Birthday Bash. In the meantime we can only hope he got at least 18 holes in on the weekend.

Posted by: Oliver Shagnasty | July 18, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Jake, weak reporting when you call this a slight to Warren but don’t name who views it as such. Is this just your opinion?

Posted by: Lydia | July 18, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

It is apparent that Obama cannot commit to naming a program he would cut, the repubs have stated EVERYTHING is on the table (Paul Ryan’s Plan gives specifics including ending tax deductions that the upper tier wage earners “rich” love because they itemize and lower the wage cap to 25% close to across the board everyone pays taxes “Flat”), but is more than willing to tax the “rich,” would not be nearly enough by the way, so the question goes out to those who support him (Obama)….What would his liberal supporters be willing to CUT?? I am betting that the so called progressives, like their President, Pelosi, or Reid will be silent…..If Obama was a businessman he would have shut down long ago…

Posted by: Parallex View | July 18, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Elizabeth Warren is owed a huge thanks from all consumers.
While Repubs would have prevented her nomination, Warren’s ideas for protecting consumers will thankfully be there to help us.

Posted by: Lydia | July 18, 2011, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

The Dems deprived Warren the opportunity to stand on her own merits…The Repubs were deprived the opportunity to question, judge, or vote on Warren’s merits…Just like liberals, making determinations on the “crystal ball” theory and then blaming the Repubs for bad Karma….Running the Government like fortune tellers…..I would even venture to write the large part of the individual Democrat politician’s budget is devoted to miracle Fish..Which way does it wiggle is the way we shall follow…Make a great 2012 bumper sticker…curling Fish..

Posted by: Parallex View | July 18, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

“While Repubs would have prevented her nomination…”
And Barry left her out to dry. What can you do?

Posted by: Laundry | July 18, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

“The reason Dodd said she couldn’t win is because the Republicans in the Senate would stonewall her nomination as a voting block.”
Posted by: Dave | Jul 18, 2011 11:42:55 AM
Warren is not the issue. Republicans oppose ANY confirmations until the power of that new agency is checked and accountability is established.
Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus said the agency will likely be “the most powerful agency that’s ever been created in Washington.” He and other Republicans have complained that Congress doesn’t control the bureau’s budget, that it will be headed by a director and not a bipartisan commission, and that it has strong leeway to decide which financial products it will curb.
Those all sound like legitimate concerns to me. Unchecked power and lack of accountability were two major reasons why Fannie/Freddie collapsed, potentially costing taxpayers up to $1 trillion when all is said and done.

Posted by: Chuck | July 18, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Those all sound like legitimate concerns to me. Unchecked power and lack of accountability were two major reasons why Fannie/Freddie collapsed, potentially costing taxpayers up to $1 trillion when all is said and done.

Posted by: Therapie | July 18, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Those all sound like legitimate concerns to me. Unchecked power and lack of accountability were two major reasons why Fannie/Freddie collapsed, potentially costing taxpayers up to $1 trillion when all is said and done.

Posted by: Therapie | July 18, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Those all sound like legitimate concerns to me. Unchecked power and lack of accountability were two major reasons why Fannie/Freddie collapsed, potentially costing taxpayers up to $1 trillion when all is said and done.

Posted by: Therapie | July 18, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Can’t wait for the Republican right to start whining when the President celebrates his 50th birthday.

Posted by: Fran | July 18, 2011, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Dodd-Frank should be put in jail for this bill. Sounds like some more fund raisers to me with some of his big donors. You know those bad old rich people.

Posted by: Freedom | July 18, 2011, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Behind the Bureau: The CFPB was the brainchild of Warren, a Harvard University law professor. The bureau is intended to make basic financial practices — such as taking out a mortgage or making loans — more clear and transparent, while ferreting out unfair lending practices.

Posted by: Jail Nation | July 18, 2011, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

“Jake, weak reporting when you call this a slight to Warren but don’t name who views it as such. Is this just your opinion?”
Lydia, weak reading, the article wasn’t written by Jake. Is this just your opinion of Jake?

Posted by: dave | July 18, 2011, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.