Aug 26, 2011 5:37pm

Ron Paul: Who Needs FEMA Anyway?

ABC News' Jason Volack reports:

With Hurricane Irene bearing down on the East Coast and taking direct aim at America’s biggest city, who needs the Federal Emergency Management Agency anyway?

At least that’s the question that presidential candidate Ron Paul raised today at a campaign stop in New Hampshire, just hours before the storm was expected to begin inflicting heavy damage up and down the Eastern Seaboard.

"We should be like 1900. We should be like 1940, 1950, 1960," Paul told a reporter for NBC News after a lunch-time speech in Gilford, N.H. "I live on the Gulf Coast; we deal with hurricanes all the time. Galveston is in my district.”

"There's no magic about FEMA. They're a great contribution to deficit financing and quite frankly they don't have a penny in the bank. We should be coordinated but coordinated voluntarily with the states," Paul said. "A state can decide. We don't need somebody in Washington."

This isn’t the first time the libertarian-leaning Texas Congressman had made controversial remarks regarding FEMA. In a May 13 interview with CNN, Paul called for the elimination of the agency.

“Why should somebody from the central part of the United States rebuild my house? Why shouldn't I have to buy my own insurance and protect about the potential dangers,” Paul said. “Well, the reason we don't have market insurance is it's too expensive. Well, why is it expensive? Because it's dangerous. Well, so why should – why should we take money from somebody else who don't get the chance to live on the Gulf and make them pay to rebuild my house?”

FEMA’s primary job is to coordinate the response to a major disaster. The agency also provides state and local governments with experts in specialized fields and assists individuals and businesses with low interest loans for rebuilding.

To receive FEMA’s help – a state my declare a state of emergency and request help from the president. The agency directed relief for both Hurricane’s Andrew in 1992 and Katrina in 2005.  

The campaign did not immediately respond to ABC News’ request for comment.

User Comments

Those of us who lived through Ike down here in Houston knows that FEMA was worse than useless; it was counterproductive. New Orleans residents have plenty of FEMA horror stories after Katrina hit.

Posted by: Joe M | August 26, 2011, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Ron Paul is absolutely right on this issue. FEMA is extremely inefficient and unfair in its distribution of resources. It should be abolished.

Posted by: Marci Lipman | August 26, 2011, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Jason Volack reports this as if we should care about FEMA, look at how well they did with Katrina. Like most all government programs it’s a huge waste of cash. When were broke and have no money, Ron continues to make all the since in the world.

Posted by: David Johnson | August 26, 2011, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Another sad attempt to make Dr. Paul look bad. sigh….
RON PAUL 2012 The only hope for our nation.

Posted by: 27Reasons | August 26, 2011, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Fema… “Your doing a Heck of Job, Bownie” I love this artical, You come out and post this just before a big storm… Nice! Scare the timid Sheeple, that Ron Paul does not want them to get help in the time of a trouble.. Another Hit job on the good Doctor… Sure if you spin his comments just alittle bit, you can create fear in the average mind!
Lets look at this for a moment, Case in point Katrina! After the Bonda Achi title wave, the United States had more relief IE water and food and Med supplies in the first day.. Provided by the United States Military… Fema did not even get the first aid into New Orlean for two WEEKS!!! So Fema efficient? Nope… States National Guard is who you call… Not Fema!! Fema is headed up by politcal cronies, not by sold profesionals!
Nice Try… I think the voter see’s this artical for what it is… Another left handed attack on the Only man running in this election that Walks it like he talks it!
Ron Paul 2012!

Posted by: Rafer Janders | August 26, 2011, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

ABC hopes this will shock Big Government lovers into thinking Paul is “kooky”.
Some in Washington are so enamored with the federal government that they can’t imagine the states taking ownership for any decisions.

Posted by: dougm_94 | August 26, 2011, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

I responded to Katrina as a national guardsman. FEMA were wasting taxpayer dollars. We ate crappy food like soldiers always do, and FEMA were grilling steaks drinking beer in beautiful RV’s that were paid for by the taxpayer. We slept in tents and got all the crappy jobs while FEMA made a camping trip of the situation!
Ron Paul 2012!!!

Posted by: FEMA Hater | August 26, 2011, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Ron Paul: Who Needs FEMA Anyway?
Not me and I’ve been through more than a few hurricanes.
Relying on the government is a mistake.

Posted by: Noz | August 26, 2011, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Such a lame attempt to make Ron Paul look like the bad guy. The country is BROKE and we need to look at worthless federal and state agencies to abolish. Especially if they are inefficient and make matters worse for those they declare to “help”.

Posted by: S. smith | August 26, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

“A witch! We’ve got a witch! A witch! Burn her! May we burn her?”
“How do you know she is a witch?”
“She looks like one!!!”
Oh the American Media, how are you supposed to be any different from Libyan State TV that called rebellion against a dictator half a century regime a band of drunken drug addicts serving America?

Posted by: Honour | August 26, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Ron Paul is right. FEMA does not represent efficient or reliable help to disaster victims. It does not represent a superior alternative to what states or individuals might provide on their own.
I have endured many a hurricane, and the occasional flood. Not once did I get the impression that Washington had a better understanding of our circumstances than we did.

Posted by: Haverstadt | August 26, 2011, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

It’s sad that the media tries to mislead people rather that report news. Ron Paul has held a consistant stance for decades, and people are now starting to listen. Publishing this article right before all h3ll breaks loose on the east coast is irresponsible reporting. Just look at FEMA’s track record. And then check out Ron Paul’s track record.

Posted by: Mike M | August 26, 2011, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

The Largest disaster relief effort in American history wasn’t Katrina or the 9/11 trade towers it was the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire with damages equivalent to $5.73 billion in 2010 dollars . Immediately after the dust settled the stricken Northern California community began relief efforts combined with state and federal (U.S. Army). Corporations and tycoons donated money (100K – big for their time) and the U.S. Congress came up with one million dollars to help. It was the insurance companies’ worst nightmare and took years to settle claims and rebuild, but people did the best they could.
My point being that in that day of high-tech considered: the telegraph, steam locomotive and horse drawn wagons, the relief efforts to get people: food; WATER; medical attention; blankets and tents etc. looked flawless compared to the FEMA coordinated Katrina debacle!
FEMA is just another blood sucking leech draining the American people dry! Ron Paul is completely in bounds to critique FEMA based upon their track record – which speaks for itself! “EVERYONE GO TO THE SUPER DOME – THERE WILL BE WATER AND FOOD – I REPEAT THERE WILL BE WATER AND FOOD…yeah. right?

Posted by: TommyO | August 26, 2011, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Can we do without a bungling group of moron who are FEMA, and cost god knows how much money?
Gee whiz, I do not know!!
I mean, this is such an important and effective agency Michael Brown, a HORGE JUDGE used to run it.
During Katrina, they prevented people form leaving the city, and also blocked incoming water and food donated by corporations and individuals.
Gee whiz, what would the US do without these jerks and idiots?

Posted by: Richard Wicks | August 26, 2011, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I haven’t seen many, at all, articles…actual news reports on Ron Paul that don’t have some sort of critical take that comes along with it. I know that in todays media everyone has to give their editorial perspective but for once I would like to just get a story about anything and be allowed to determine for myself whether I think something is good or bad, right or wrong. IF the media was a person I would fight him…alas he would tell on me though.

Posted by: news? | August 26, 2011, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Yeah, you’re right. Things were much better after Katrina.
FEMA = FAIL
Here are a few headlines from that FEMA fiasco.
“Flooded and forgotten”, “FEMA to ask for return of millions in Katrina aid”,
“FEMA covered up cancer risks to Katrina victims”, “Is FEMA its own disaster area?”
The MSM sure has a short memory.
Ron Paul 2012!

Posted by: RP2012 | August 26, 2011, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Lots of people in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas do not exactly hold FEMA’s effectiveness in responding to disaster in very high regard. When FEMA can out do Wal-Mart in the efficiency and efficacy of its response to disaster, we can then discount the initiative and cooperative efforts of private citizens and private organizations, as well as the effectiveness multi-state cooperative compacts, in favor of a FEMA-type response.
Read Paul’s whole statement instead of repeating other reporters who have also not read Paul’s full statement. The sea wall in Galveston was not built by FEMA, but by the community of Galveston.
After you read Paul’s full statement, then listen to “Big-Box Stores’ Hurricane Prep Starts Early” by Jon Hamilton (8/26/11) and “Wal-Mart Aid Outpaced Some Federal Efforts” by Frank Langfitt (9/9/2005) both on National Public Radio.

Posted by: Jay | August 26, 2011, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

When you take government seriously, it can be helpful. But when you deliberately appoint clowns like Brownie, or starve it, of course it’s not going to work. Just another self-fulfilling right wing prophecy. Like the Bush tax cuts – oh my g-d now there’s a deficit! Must cut social programs. It’s class warfare. Wake up, you’re the fodder.

Posted by: Sal | August 26, 2011, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Yes we ought do away with FEMA, especially after Hurricane Katrina when they blocked aid and supplies to the dome. They do not protect nor do they aid us. FEMA’s existence is not in the best interests of the people of the US, nor is the Department of Homeland Security. These agencies are the equivalent of the KGB, NKVD, Cheka and Gulag system in the Soviet Union. FEMA is bad news.

Posted by: Clark | August 26, 2011, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

I lived in south Florida for 20 years… FEMA is a joke. If you count on FEMA you are in bad shape. This is the biggest waste of money I have ever seen….

Posted by: Tod | August 26, 2011, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

As a physician, would Ron Paul like to go back to the medicine available in 1900? Even 1940, 1950, 1960? We don’t need to go backward in this country.
As for those who cite FEMA’s lousy job during Katrina, just remember who was in charge of FEMA, and the country, then – Republicans!!!!

Posted by: Tired of Nonsense | August 26, 2011, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Tired of Nonsense:
So it’s ok when FEMA does a bad job so long as we can blame it on someone for political reasons?
Where are all the people who have supposedly being help by FEMA? Why do I not see their stories? I see tons and tons of stories about how bad of a job they do.

Posted by: smokey | August 26, 2011, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Ron Paul is as crazy as a homeowner living ten feet below sea level who won’t leave their home with a ten foot surge coming at them.

Posted by: kravitz | August 26, 2011, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

The writer should check their references. If you watch the original interview you will find that Ron Paul never said we should be like the 1900′s. It’s a misquote, so this whole article is a farce. It is simply an attempt at making to make him look too old and too backward. He just spoke of how that [even] in the 1900′s people were able to rebuild a city! Take the time to watch the video so that next time you don’t look so foolish.

Posted by: Julie Patrick | August 27, 2011, 12:07 am 12:07 am

In support, hell NO we don’t need FEMA or a innumerable other departments and agencies that abolishment of their everyday costs would leave us completely fiscally healthy to deal with natural disasters case by case through the States.
Paul is not PC but he is correct and I find it refreshing. Get used to it America.

Posted by: fyi2day | August 27, 2011, 12:25 am 12:25 am

FEMA has a TERRIBLE track record. Good points, Ron Paul!

Posted by: Gabe Gaynor | August 27, 2011, 12:42 am 12:42 am

FEMA Wastes more than it helps!
Bought 2,000 trailers for Katrina that were so Poisonous that they had to store them for two years and sell these uninhabitable trailers off for pennies on the dollar!
You and I were forced to pay that bill and NOBODY got FIRED at FEMA!

Posted by: Paul | August 27, 2011, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I know several contractors that “ride out” FEMA and federal clean-up contracts, and they Clean Up! They admit that it’s “easy Money”, but that the “Feds” have no clue what is happening…… how to deal with the situation, or how much it should cost….just another program designed to leech us dry, while treading upon our freedoms………I agree that is a job for soldiers, bring the Troops home!!!!

Posted by: D Generic | August 27, 2011, 12:55 am 12:55 am

“As for those who cite FEMA’s lousy job during Katrina, just remember who was in charge of FEMA, and the country, then – Republicans!!!!” – Tired of Nonsense
The lousy job during Katrina was initiated and nurtured by the local and State Demos.
The Repubs came in later to add their ineptness.

Posted by: Noz | August 27, 2011, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Republican & democrat alike were stumbling. They both feed off failures, while the US people suffer. Sad.

Posted by: craztimes | August 27, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

One expects Ron Paul, the patron saint of libertarians, to ask awkward questions, regardless of political fashion. I knew of his oppositon to the Federal Reserve and its methods but not of his objection to FEMA.

Posted by: Candadai Tirumalai | August 27, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Another well timed hit piece on Ron Paul that is backfiring for the msm. I’m glad people are beginning to see through their BS. FEMA is just another bloated agency that serves no useful purpose for the people.

Posted by: Jay D. | August 27, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Paul is right again (what else is new?) What did all us spoiled spoon fed Americans do before FEMA came into the picture you ask? …We got by, that’s what. Nothing has changed in humanity to suggest that we aren’t all competent enough to get through a storm without the government. The people who claim Ron Paul is a nut for suggesting we don’t need FEMA are the same spoiled brat entitled Americans who are part of the problem. When you invite the government to oversee business they don’t belong in you invariably lose 2 things …your money and more freedoms. People need to wake up and stop letting fear guide every decision they make.

Posted by: Rob | August 27, 2011, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

It seems that the best for our country is to be back in the 19 century. All the States were pretty much in sync with each other. Who needs a centralized agency that the only thing they try to do is to put rules, regulations, standardize the information, and make recovery efforts more efficient and affordable. It should be left alone like the financial markets. After all, it is a waste of tax payer’s money. FEMA grew the most when Republicans were in the White House. Is that a coincidence?

Posted by: Progress | August 27, 2011, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Pleease don’t mistake a bad response by the fed once with the fed being bad in general. Besides, why do you want a guy who HATES the Fed RUNNING the fed?

Posted by: Misty | August 28, 2011, 9:07 am 9:07 am

You all hate fema until its your house that gets destroyed in a hurricane, tornado or earthquake and then your the first in line with your hands out..look at all these GOP governors lining up for money

Posted by: thom droney | August 28, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

FEMA is only as good as its director. Bush crony, Brown, was an incompetent fool who should not have been the head. He had no disaster management experience. North Carolina Bev Perdue, said recently, that she had nothing but praise for FEMA, and how it is helping in this crisis

Posted by: Jeff | August 28, 2011, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

ru paul is an anti-american liberal

Posted by: Winston | August 28, 2011, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Ron Paul is a certifiable nut case who would have been comfortable in the 1750′s. Do away with FEMA? Of course, in the next didaster all the Congressman (especially those from the affected districts) would be yelling, why doesn’t the Government (Obama) do anything about this? Where is the federal Government when we need them?
Perhaps we should go further and disband all fire departments (after all, we used to have volunteer and for-hire fire departments, people carrying buckets of water to the fire, and we know how well that worked out). Lets get rid of the armed forces, coast guard, police, fire, garbage, etc and really be self-dependent-that puts us back to about 3000 BC and total anarchy.

Posted by: Paul Williamson | August 28, 2011, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Paul’s right

I am from Florida and have been through 7 tropicals and 1 tornado and they are the biggest set of crooks around.They use the national guard to stop local contractors from getting in the wealthy neighborhoods with the FEMA guys escorting their already millionaire cousins in to steal the most lucrative insurance contracts.The great part is WE PAY FOR OUR OWN ROBBERY!,or as Ron keeps reminding us,we borrow from really rich people,to pay for our own robbery.That money should go right to the State.They know what to do with it unless you have an evil man like Jeb Bush in charge who lets old people freeze in winter with no roof in Northern Florida.

Posted by: Julian Alien | September 2, 2011, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Don’t mind Winston,he hasn’t his medication yet.Cheers whenever.

Posted by: Julian Alien | September 2, 2011, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

There are definitely many more details to take into consideration, but thanks for sharing Ron Paul: Who Needs FEMA Anyway? – ABC News.

Posted by: Rosana Aono | September 6, 2011, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

I dont need FEMA.
I have only heard horror stories from them trying to regulate support in disaster areas. I totally agree that this article was biased and timed so as to scare those preparing for a storm. We are all people and we as a whole are compassionate. We help our neighbors when we can and do not need someone from a beauracracy to tell us how to help. They are inefficient and out of touch.
It’s just another federal agency that steals from the people that should be left to the States.

Posted by: not me | December 25, 2011, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.