<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barney Frank Chastises Republicans for Blocking CFPB Director Confirmation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Morgan</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1515291</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1515291</guid>
		<description>The economic facts are eerily familiar and no less depressing: No new jobs were created in August. The national unemployment rate is more than 9 percent. (It is probably closer to 20% when the unemployed who have given up hope of finding a job and the underemployed are counted.) Some states have an official 12% unemployment rate or even higher. Thousands are losing their jobs every day. President Obama has thrown $4 trillion into the economy, including billions to save the banks and car companies, yet not one job has been created. Housing prices continue to fall as more people foreclose. Houses are being demolished in an attempt to elevate housing prices. Once-flourishing neighborhoods now look like ghost towns as jobs disappear. Consumers who are unsure if their jobs are secure, and the many unemployed millions, aren&#039;t spending because they lack the money to spend. Most live paycheck-to-paycheck and barely make ends meet. Republicans, Democrats, Tea Party politicians, Independents and every other political persuasion has either failed to make proposals to create jobs, or has implemented proposals that have failed miserably.

    I believe there is light at the end of this bleak economic tunnel.  Americans need not wake up each day with feelings of despair. To that end I would like to propose solutions to jump-start the economy.

    It should be crystal clear by now that tax breaks for businesses and individuals have failed - and will continue to fail - because businesses and consumers can&#039;t spend tax breaks. And that is the key to reducing unemployment: consumer spending. According to many economists, some 70% of economic activity in the United States is generated by consumer spending. Consumers and businesses need cold hard cash in their bank accounts.

    So my proposal is simple: the federal government should give money to where it will do the most good: directly to consumers. Each taxpaying family earning under $200,000 annually should be given a minimum of $25,000 to spend as they please. When consumers spend, jobs are created. Do families deserve this federal bailout? I firmly believe that they do; it was taxpayers who bailed out the banks and car companies. It is high time for the federal government to show its gratitude to taxpayers by bailing them out. My proposal would result in a short-term decrease of federal government revenue, but the decrease would eventually be offset by tax revenue generated by working people.
    A stiff tariff should be imposed on goods imported from countries which have an adverse military, political and/or economic relationship with the United States. For example, China has for many years blocked American imports, dramatically increased its exports to the United States, failed to let its currency float, abused human rights, and created an adversarial political, economic and military relationship. It is morally reprehensible for manufacturers to do business in China or with any other country which does not share our economic, military and/or political values. The tariff would not only send a political message to these countries but would bring back jobs to America.
    The income tax system should be scrapped entirely and replaced by a consumer-oriented tax. A 6% tax on all goods and services, including food and medicine, should be levied by the federal government. States and local governments can add another 2, 3 or 4 cents. There would be more than enough money to finance federal, state and local governments.
    The United States should vacate Iraq and Afghanistan immediately, not in one, two or three years. While the kids in those countries are receiving a high-quality education at American taxpayer expense (and part of the curriculum focuses on how to hate Americans and other infidels), the infrastructure of many schools in the United States is crumbling, and layoffs of thousands of teachers and other support personnel continue unabated. The U.S. simply can&#039;t afford to educate the kids in three countries. Our own kids should take priority.    

    Your comments are welcomed and encouraged.
 

    Respectfully submitted,

    Steven Morgan, North Hollywood, CA
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The economic facts are eerily familiar and no less depressing: No new jobs were created in August. The national unemployment rate is more than 9 percent. (It is probably closer to 20% when the unemployed who have given up hope of finding a job and the underemployed are counted.) Some states have an official 12% unemployment rate or even higher. Thousands are losing their jobs every day. President Obama has thrown $4 trillion into the economy, including billions to save the banks and car companies, yet not one job has been created. Housing prices continue to fall as more people foreclose. Houses are being demolished in an attempt to elevate housing prices. Once-flourishing neighborhoods now look like ghost towns as jobs disappear. Consumers who are unsure if their jobs are secure, and the many unemployed millions, aren&#8217;t spending because they lack the money to spend. Most live paycheck-to-paycheck and barely make ends meet. Republicans, Democrats, Tea Party politicians, Independents and every other political persuasion has either failed to make proposals to create jobs, or has implemented proposals that have failed miserably.</p>
<p>    I believe there is light at the end of this bleak economic tunnel.  Americans need not wake up each day with feelings of despair. To that end I would like to propose solutions to jump-start the economy.</p>
<p>    It should be crystal clear by now that tax breaks for businesses and individuals have failed &#8211; and will continue to fail &#8211; because businesses and consumers can&#8217;t spend tax breaks. And that is the key to reducing unemployment: consumer spending. According to many economists, some 70% of economic activity in the United States is generated by consumer spending. Consumers and businesses need cold hard cash in their bank accounts.</p>
<p>    So my proposal is simple: the federal government should give money to where it will do the most good: directly to consumers. Each taxpaying family earning under $200,000 annually should be given a minimum of $25,000 to spend as they please. When consumers spend, jobs are created. Do families deserve this federal bailout? I firmly believe that they do; it was taxpayers who bailed out the banks and car companies. It is high time for the federal government to show its gratitude to taxpayers by bailing them out. My proposal would result in a short-term decrease of federal government revenue, but the decrease would eventually be offset by tax revenue generated by working people.<br />
    A stiff tariff should be imposed on goods imported from countries which have an adverse military, political and/or economic relationship with the United States. For example, China has for many years blocked American imports, dramatically increased its exports to the United States, failed to let its currency float, abused human rights, and created an adversarial political, economic and military relationship. It is morally reprehensible for manufacturers to do business in China or with any other country which does not share our economic, military and/or political values. The tariff would not only send a political message to these countries but would bring back jobs to America.<br />
    The income tax system should be scrapped entirely and replaced by a consumer-oriented tax. A 6% tax on all goods and services, including food and medicine, should be levied by the federal government. States and local governments can add another 2, 3 or 4 cents. There would be more than enough money to finance federal, state and local governments.<br />
    The United States should vacate Iraq and Afghanistan immediately, not in one, two or three years. While the kids in those countries are receiving a high-quality education at American taxpayer expense (and part of the curriculum focuses on how to hate Americans and other infidels), the infrastructure of many schools in the United States is crumbling, and layoffs of thousands of teachers and other support personnel continue unabated. The U.S. simply can&#8217;t afford to educate the kids in three countries. Our own kids should take priority.    </p>
<p>    Your comments are welcomed and encouraged.</p>
<p>    Respectfully submitted,</p>
<p>    Steven Morgan, North Hollywood, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick McDaniel</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1487661</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick McDaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1487661</guid>
		<description>That really doesn&#039;t matter, because in the end, neither party REALLY intends to protect consumers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really doesn&#8217;t matter, because in the end, neither party REALLY intends to protect consumers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1446161</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1446161</guid>
		<description>And how many JUDGE nominations by Bush were held up by Democrats?  Amazing what the liberals get all stitched up about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how many JUDGE nominations by Bush were held up by Democrats?  Amazing what the liberals get all stitched up about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talmag</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1440911</link>
		<dc:creator>talmag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1440911</guid>
		<description>Note to Davis...anyone who does not think we need a Consumer Financial Protection Board is phycho. You would probably be the first one to compain about your credit card&#039;s extra fees or hidden fees...someone like you would not overlook this but you have no recall now...but with this bill you will.  What is really funny...it all those who say too much government love to use it when it suits them...Bachman...government subsidies to her family farm, for her constituants in her state, for her husband&#039;s business. Perry with the stimulus...claiming it did not work...however, he used billion of stimulus money to balance his budget deficit. Again Perry..wanted to seceed from the union and slamed govt. until he had flooding and fires and then he yelled...where is Fems..you know the group he wants to do away with.....talk about phonies. Even several newly elected tea party people who slam subsidies are now privately seeking some for their states...because it works and they need to provide jobs....such phonies...not enough said about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to Davis&#8230;anyone who does not think we need a Consumer Financial Protection Board is phycho. You would probably be the first one to compain about your credit card&#8217;s extra fees or hidden fees&#8230;someone like you would not overlook this but you have no recall now&#8230;but with this bill you will.  What is really funny&#8230;it all those who say too much government love to use it when it suits them&#8230;Bachman&#8230;government subsidies to her family farm, for her constituants in her state, for her husband&#8217;s business. Perry with the stimulus&#8230;claiming it did not work&#8230;however, he used billion of stimulus money to balance his budget deficit. Again Perry..wanted to seceed from the union and slamed govt. until he had flooding and fires and then he yelled&#8230;where is Fems..you know the group he wants to do away with&#8230;..talk about phonies. Even several newly elected tea party people who slam subsidies are now privately seeking some for their states&#8230;because it works and they need to provide jobs&#8230;.such phonies&#8230;not enough said about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1431971</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 12:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1431971</guid>
		<description>Reading these comments from the dranged left scares me.  They vote and procreate...  The APA is trying to say that pedophilia is &quot;normal&quot; and should be allowed.  I just wonder when they&#039;ll get around to confiming that liberalism is a mnetal disorder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading these comments from the dranged left scares me.  They vote and procreate&#8230;  The APA is trying to say that pedophilia is &#8220;normal&#8221; and should be allowed.  I just wonder when they&#8217;ll get around to confiming that liberalism is a mnetal disorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DewyB</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1416401</link>
		<dc:creator>DewyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 06:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1416401</guid>
		<description>Looks like we&#039;ll be eating rich people soon, it is the logical conclusion... they starve us, we get tired of it and storm their palace. I guess they aren&#039;t that smart if they can&#039;t learn from history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like we&#8217;ll be eating rich people soon, it is the logical conclusion&#8230; they starve us, we get tired of it and storm their palace. I guess they aren&#8217;t that smart if they can&#8217;t learn from history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newcountryman</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1406821</link>
		<dc:creator>newcountryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1406821</guid>
		<description>Consumer Financial Protection Board? Just another committee. That&#039;s what politicians do. Whenever things go bellyup, they create a committee. You&#039;re not folling anyone Mr. Frank. Well, I guess maybe you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Financial Protection Board? Just another committee. That&#8217;s what politicians do. Whenever things go bellyup, they create a committee. You&#8217;re not folling anyone Mr. Frank. Well, I guess maybe you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexBork</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1401281</link>
		<dc:creator>TexBork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1401281</guid>
		<description>Storck78, I agree.  Regardless of party or anything, if there&#039;s going to be a filibuster, then do it.  Filibuster.  Don&#039;t simply call one and not actually filibuster.  Talk, read, whatever, and if the filibusterer can&#039;t hang, filibuster over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storck78, I agree.  Regardless of party or anything, if there&#8217;s going to be a filibuster, then do it.  Filibuster.  Don&#8217;t simply call one and not actually filibuster.  Talk, read, whatever, and if the filibusterer can&#8217;t hang, filibuster over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wantingbalance</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1399041</link>
		<dc:creator>wantingbalance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1399041</guid>
		<description>The &quot;rule&quot; that the Republicans are using to force a &quot;compromise&quot; on other legislation is Rule 22.  A Democrat president proposed it in 1917.  It was approved by a Democrat-controlled Senate and remained as written under the standing belief that a Senator should have the right to speak as long as he or she wished.  Having something to say is not a requirement.  In 1975, the Democrat-controlled Senate reduced the number of votes needed to stop discussion to 60 and implemented a new additional rule that you didn&#039;t actually have to stand and speak. Anytime the Democrats complain about the use of Rule 22 by the Republicans just remember that it was the Democrats who created and passed the rule.  But here I side with Obama.  The Republicans want new Free Trade agreements signed in exchange.  Don&#039;t do it.  Bill Clinton started the migration of 20 million jobs when he signed NAFTA.  We need these new trade bills about as much as we need a new commerce chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;rule&#8221; that the Republicans are using to force a &#8220;compromise&#8221; on other legislation is Rule 22.  A Democrat president proposed it in 1917.  It was approved by a Democrat-controlled Senate and remained as written under the standing belief that a Senator should have the right to speak as long as he or she wished.  Having something to say is not a requirement.  In 1975, the Democrat-controlled Senate reduced the number of votes needed to stop discussion to 60 and implemented a new additional rule that you didn&#8217;t actually have to stand and speak. Anytime the Democrats complain about the use of Rule 22 by the Republicans just remember that it was the Democrats who created and passed the rule.  But here I side with Obama.  The Republicans want new Free Trade agreements signed in exchange.  Don&#8217;t do it.  Bill Clinton started the migration of 20 million jobs when he signed NAFTA.  We need these new trade bills about as much as we need a new commerce chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spoofproof</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/barney-frank-chastises-republicans-for-blocking-cfpb-director-confirmation/#comment-1398931</link>
		<dc:creator>spoofproof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=34421#comment-1398931</guid>
		<description>Heh, Extraordinarily qualified, Barney? Like your &quot;extraordinary&quot; qualifications? Stuff a sock in it Barney. You are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, Extraordinarily qualified, Barney? Like your &#8220;extraordinary&#8221; qualifications? Stuff a sock in it Barney. You are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>