Elizabeth Warren Runs for Senate as Democrat, But Exerts Independence

Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard law school professor and consumer advocate, officially entered the Massachusetts Senate race this week. She’d been testing the waters for weeks and now faces the ultimate test: Can she connect with Massachusetts voters and withstand a long primary to take the Senate seat of Republican Scott Brown?
Warren helped create the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau but was passed over to lead it mostly because of Republican opposition.
In her announcement video Warren tried to appeal to voters by talking about her humble roots and pledging to stand up for the middle class.
“Middle-class families have been chipped at, hacked at, squeezed and hammered for a generation now, and I don’t think Washington gets it,” Warren said. “I grew up on the ragged edge of the middle-class and I know it’s hard out there.”
Warren said she had ”fought” her whole life for “working families” and she has “stood up to some pretty powerful interests.”
That message, Democrats said, would be the key to success, but as a first time candidate, who angered both Republicans and Democrats as a government watchdog while in Washington, she will undoubtedly have a tough fight against her Democratic rivals and Brown.
Longtime Massachusetts Democratic strategist Mary Anne Marsh said Warren had a strong message, but as a brand-new, first-time candidate she is still getting her “sea legs.” Marsh, who is not affiliated with the Warren campaign, outlined the message that she believes should be the Warren campaign’s pitch to Massachusetts independent voters.
“In a year when everyone is mad at Washington and Wall Street, Scott Brown joined the club and Elizabeth Warren has been throwing bombs at it,” Marsh said. “It’s easier to get out there and fight for someone else, fight for a cause, but when you have to go out there and make the case for yourself, it’s a challenge, but that’s always the case.”
Marsh added that despite a crowded primary field, Warren should try to dominate her Democratic rivals early and raise funds to run a campaign directly against Brown before the brief six week general election gets under way next September.
“She needs to consolidate the Democrats, which would let her take the fight to Scott Brown earlier rather than later,” Marsh said.
Warren hit the campaign trail Wednesday, greeting commuters at a T stop in Boston, and then traveled around the state. At one stop she aimed to distance herself from President Obama and his low poll numbers.
When asked whether her past work in the Obama administration could hurt her campaign, Warren said, ”I’m my own person, and I’ve been talking about my set of issues for a very long time. I’ve stood toe-to-toe with a lot of different folks for the past few years, and I will continue to do that.”
She was, however, evasive on whether she would support Obama’s American Jobs Act.
“We’ve got to have a jobs bill and we’ve got to have a jobs bill now, but it’s not enough to do short-term and temporary fixes,” Warren said, according to the Boston Herald. ”We have to make changes about our long-term investments.
“What I’m doing right now is trying to talk about the bigger conversation we need to have,” she said. “We need to get ourselves pulled out of this recession, but there’s a real values question about where we are heading.”
Doug Rubin, a Warren campaign adviser, said he’s seen “genuine excitement” on their two days on the trail, and said the key to a “successful campaign” is building the grassroots support.
“We need to earn this one day at a time in the primary, and that’s where the focus is,” Rubin said. “We need to win the primary, and then we’ll have the opportunity to take on Sen. Brown.”
Rubin said the campaign would stay “focused on the issues that Elizabeth Warren has been focused on: fighting for middle-class families and making sure they have an advocate in the United States senator from Massachusetts.”
Before taking on Brown, Warren needs to beat City Year co-founder Alan Khazei; Newton Mayor Setti Warren; State Rep. Thomas Conroy; Bob Massie, who is a former candidate for lieutenant governor; immigration attorney Marisa DeFranco; and engineer Herb Robinson from Newton.
On Labor Day, she headlined the Greater Boston Labor Council’s annual Labor Day breakfast while her would-be opponents were relegated to the sidelines. The group’s Executive Secretary and Treasurer Richard Rogers said they got some heat from the other campaigns for having Warren headline, but they weren’t endorsing her. But there was a lot of interest in hearing about her work setting up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, he said.
The Greater Boston Labor Council is part of the state AFL-CIO, and Rogers said the council wouldn’t be choosing a candidate to back anytime soon, although he said Warren had a strong message that would be well-received by the different labor organizations.
“We love her message. If she sticks to that message, she’ll get a fair hearing and quite a bit of support from the labor movement,” Rogers said.
Even though there won’t be an official union endorsement soon, Warren is now viewed as the establishment candidate, something her rivals will have to contend with.
“The field has been wanting,” Marsh said. “People were lukewarm at best with the choices they had, and she has clearly done a terrific job coming out of the box and introducing herself. I know a lot of people who attended the house parties. … I never heard a reaction to anybody like the one I heard about her, from both new and old time Democratic activists. They definitely seemed enthusiastic about her.”
Brown campaign manager Jim Barnett believes the long primary season puts the Brown campaign at an advantage.
“She’s just the latest entrant in what’s going to be a long and expensive and divisive primary, and a year from now, once the Democrats decide on who the nominee is, we will be prepared to take on whomever that is. Until then, Scott will be focused on finding bipartisan solutions to improve our economy, get workers back on the job, reduce the debt and keep taxes low,” Barnett said.
And the long primary has already begun. Khazei — who’s the main fundraiser among the contenders — asked Warren, in a statement to the Boston Globe to reject “contributions from every single political action committee and corporate lobbyist. For too long now, the political system in Washington has been failing average families because it is corrupted with powerful, monied PACs and special interests who are gaming the system.”
The Khazei campaign did not return calls from ABCNews.com seeking comment, but Rubin said in a statement, “Anyone who’s going to contribute to Elizabeth Warren’s campaign knows she has been fighting for middle-class families her whole life, and that’s who she’ll fight for in the Senate. Nothing’s going to change that.”
Warren has already received encouragement and money from outside groups, making it impossible for her to accept Khazei’s challenge. The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, for example, not only helped Warren organize the house parties before she officially got in the race but announced Wednesday it had already raised $200,000 for her.
Even if Warren does sail through the primary and bests her opponents, she still has to face Brown, who is very popular in the state. Republicans will likely push the message that she is an Ivory tower Harvard law professor and Oklahoma native who’s too liberal and can’t connect with voters or know the worries of average voters.
Brown surprised the country by defeating State Attorney General Martha Coakley in bright blue Massachusetts last year, and he’s sure to return to themes from that campaign in which he drove around the state in his pickup truck telling his story of overcoming a hardscrabble, difficult childhood, and pledging to work across the aisle.
The Warren camp isn’t worried about how the Republicans will define her. Rubin said, “Once voters get to meet her and see her that won’t be an issue for us.
“It’s not who she is and I think voters will quickly realize that. That’s why we are working hard to get around the state so voters can meet her, ask her questions and get to know who she is and what she cares about,” Rubin said.
Besides Massachusetts being a blue state, Warren has another advantage over the Republican senator: Brown won in a special election, but the Brown-Warren brawl will be held in a presidential year, where voter turnout will be higher than for a special election. Bay State Republican strategist Rob Gray admitted this was a hurdle for Brown’s campaign, but the fact that Warren has not run before is “a crapshoot in terms of how [she] connect with voters and connects on TV.
“I don’t think you can just put on a plaid shirt and a barn jacket and drive a pick up truck and be somebody you’re not. It worked for Scott Brown because that’s who he is,” Gray said. “Running in a presidential election year in Massachusetts with increased turnout with casual Democrats and independents voting is a major speed bump for Scott Brown and being re-elected.
“He’s done a good job in the official positions he’s taken, being true to how he ran, being a moderate, which fits with the Massachusetts electorate, but the electoral make up of Massachusetts is very complicated for him in a presidential election year.”
Gray does think the late primary will help Warren because it “tests her as a candidate.”
“And winning in September even against weak opposition does make you look like a winner close to Election Day,” Gray said.
Republicans are already trying to fundraise off the Warren entrance. The state GOP sent out a fundraising e mail entitled, “Push Back Against the D.C. Machine.”
“Today, the same people that Senator Brown has been standing up to in the Senate, the big government believers and the Washington insiders sent Professor Elizabeth Warren to Massachusetts to push their failed agenda here,” the e mail read.
Martha Coakley was seen as unable to connect with Massachusetts Democrats and that’s the ultimate fear for Democrats with the Warren campaign who desperately want to win back the seat Kennedy held for over forty years, but Marsh urges Warren to be herself and make sure she can “throw a punch” and “take a punch.”
“Elizabeth Warren has to be Elizabeth Warren and that’s the most important thing,” Marsh said. “Voters have to get to know you and like you first in that order, then if you are successful and they believe what you are saying the last consideration before going in to the voting booth is, ‘Do I trust this person to keep their word?’”

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Way to go Elizabeth…you will bring much to this state with your intellict and awareness of what is good for the middle class and others. I wish you luck and wish I lived in Mass. to vote for you. Be prepared for the GOP to throw everything including the kitchen sink at you…but you will survive.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano | September 16, 2011, 8:45 am 8:45 am
I would love to see her win and sit next to the Senators who basically shot her down. She has more brains than most of them combined. She has fought for middle class when it wasn’t popular. Brown cannot string a sensible sentence together without having to retract it two days later.
Posted by: kay | September 16, 2011, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Because what this country needs is another career academic and professional gadfly? Warren who may be ‘brilliant’ and a good talker but she has never created a real sustainable job let alone run a business and actually makes a nice living doing nothing but criticizing those who do? With 9.1% unemployment, I would like to see more candidates who actually understand how private sector job creation really works!
Posted by: BCT | September 16, 2011, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Good for her and good for US if she wins. She’s going up against Scott Brown, the guy who won Kennedy’s seat. Fun fact about Mr. Brown: he ranks either #1 or #2 in the entire Congress for campaign donation support from Wall Street and the financial sector. Those guys absolutely LOVE Mr. Brown. Ms. Warren is a tough and intelligent lady and I hope she wins……..
Posted by: Searambler | September 16, 2011, 9:07 am 9:07 am
It’s funny. Republicans complain about ‘career politicians’, and they ALSO complain about someone like Warren with no political experience. I guess the common thread here is: Republicans complain. Constantly. The guy she is trying to unseat, Scott Brown, is a career politician who has never ‘created any jobs in the private sector’. Unless you count his nude modelling career……….
Posted by: Searambler | September 16, 2011, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Scott Brown has kept every campaign promise he has made which says a lot in today’s political world. Even though he is a moderate Republican he has certainly shown bipartisanship since he has taken office. People say he is an ally of Wall Street, but he is more an ally of business. It would be hypocritical to say he gets most of his donations from Wall Street. Should we look at Kerry’s or Obama’s donations?
Posted by: Carol Klein | September 16, 2011, 10:13 am 10:13 am
She is the REAL DEAL!, & that’s why the REPUBS drag her down. She makes too much sense for big business to take advantage of us. Big business = Medical , Insurance , Banks you know all those things that got deregulated during the Bush years & I don’t know about you but during the Bush years my credit cards went out of control bc the banks kept raising my interest rate for no reason…multiple times! & we saw medical expenses shoot thru the roof & then we saw insurance companies taking less responsibility. Everything was driven by Wall Street, then Wall Street almost ruined the whole monetary system…..And now Repubs want to go back in & their solution is MORE DEREGULATION????? OMG!
Posted by: hhh | September 16, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Elizabeth Warren refuses to address the issues of blue collar workers in Massachusetts. Commercial wind turbines are proposed through the Massachusetts Wind Energy Siting Reform Act which is not a reform act at all but a way for the state to site commercial wind turbines like they did in the Town of Falmouth !
The Massachusetts Constitution affirms the dignity and equality of all individuals. It forbids the creation of second-class citizens. The state through its semi quasi state agency and the cities and towns along with the agenda of the current governor are creating a second class group of citizens with the poor siting of commercial wind turbines.
What will Elizabeth Warren do to protect the residential property rights of the blue collar home owners ? – Nothing
Posted by: Bill Carson | September 16, 2011, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Carol Klein wrote, “It would be hypocritical to say he gets most of his donations from Wall Street.”
Why would that be hypocritical? Besides, that’s not what I said. I did not say he gets most of his donations from Wall Street, I said that he gets the most money from Wall Street of ALL of Congress. In other words, out of EVERYONE in Congress, Wall Street gives HIM the most money. That’s not hypocritical, that’s a verifiable fact. Interpret it however you like……….
Posted by: SearamblerOne | September 16, 2011, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Bill Carson wrote, “What will Elizabeth Warren do to protect the residential property rights of the blue collar home owners ? – Nothing”
Bill, are you a psychic? Because that’s the only explanation for your statement of what she WILL or WILL NOT do if she gets elected to public office………..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | September 16, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
This is the single most responsible person for why we have increased banking and credit card fees! She thinks she can make things better and fairer for us little people but has only made things worse.
Posted by: RamboR | September 17, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
If we lived in a country where candidates possessed the intelligence of Elizabeth Warren vs. that of Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin, it would be a better world.
Posted by: Plantain_11 | September 17, 2011, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016!
Posted by: Plantain_11 | September 17, 2011, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Whoop-de-doo with Warren. A Harvard law professor type. One that we are told is so mega-genius. Anytime her name comes up. Every time her name comes up.
Rings a bell, someone whom we are told is a mega-genius. A cracked bell. One scheduled to be replaced in 2012.
I’m more inclined to vote for a plumber, bricklayer, dress maker, or caterer that decides to run for office instead of another mega-genius Harvard law professor. Particularly ones that started their own plumbing, brick-laying, dress-making, or catering business and successfully employed people.
But that’s because I don’t buy into the hype that being an elected official should be such a complex thing that only highly-specialized mega-genius law professors can be senators.
This isn’t ancient Egypt where only the priestly class are the only ones educated enough to rule. Over all the peons dragging those big blocks of stone.
Overall, looks like the democrats checked the rule book and found out they couldn’t dress up Obama in drag and run him (her?) in MA, as an official split personality. Lucky for them Warren was available.
And why Warren? Shouldn’t Arlen Specter have been given another chance to become a democrat senator, this time from MA instead of PA? And how about Sestak? Shouldn’t he be given another chance to become a democrat senator, this time from MA instead of PA? Pretty brutal, with the democrats. Get hand-picked and propped up to run in a state and lose then they toss you away.
Warren joins seven others seeking the democrat nomination for MA senator. Seven SUCKERS! Looks you you home-grown type seven candidates can’t do for the Obama what Warren could as a senator from MA. So now you seven, pleased step aside, make a hole, Warren coming through.
Obama voted present a lot on the way to the big show. Right out of the blocks it seems Warren is in the same mold, as in fungus. Wouldn’t say whether yes, she would vote for Obama’s jobs bill or no, she wouldn’t vote for Obama’s jobs bill.
So when a bill comes up in the senate, what would a senator Warren say when asked how she votes: Let’s have a conversation?
So according to some a senator it seems could vote any one of four ways: Yea, Nay, Present, and Let’s Have a Conversation.
Doesn’t seem like that bothers anyone other than those who value straight-forward answers.
The story as it stands. Ted Kennedy upped and died. Martha Coakley couldn’t do it. So now the democrats trot out and pump Liz Warren. All when Obama is more greased pig rather than someone with coattails to ride. Another Crash and Burn in progress!!!
Posted by: dom youngross | September 18, 2011, 5:23 am 5:23 am
Note to BCt…why do you think the republicans hate her? She is good at what she does and she fights for the protection of the middle class dems and reps. Her work has been to keep credit cards companies from scamming more money with hidden costs to protect everyone. She is smart…hard working…and will do what is right no matter what. She has worked hard all her life for people’s rights and I would rather have someone like her who will take no guff nor money from anyone. Good luck Elizabeth…I can see they are already scared of you and what you can do.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano | September 18, 2011, 11:42 am 11:42 am
What I don’t understand about people is that giving tax breaks to corporations has provided little or no jobs…not during the Bush administration nor during the Obama administration…it is so evident. Why do the reps. still say theyare the job creators. More jobs were lost under Bush the entire 8 years the corporations had these breaks…yet no one blamed Bush. Obama was wrong to continue them but he did it to keep unemployment benefits for those out of work and I know it will never happen again. He needs to repeal this and get on with the business of making taxation equal. Most of the corporations do not pay the 35% anyway. Even after Obama extended the Bush tax breaks….they still have not started to hire. Don’t give me that afraid of what is down the line. That is baloney. More jobs have been shipped over seas under the Bush admin. and yet no one seemed to notice it.. ..so how did these tax breaks help us? They and the two wars are what helped caused this recession along with the underhanded practices of the banks who are now sitting on record profits and not loaning out money. They want the rep. back in charge because they feel or know they will be getting away with more than they can under Obama. People cried for someone to take a hand with the banks and Obama did and now these very same people are complaining about something that was done to discourage bad practices like selling mortages over and over. I say this…let’s take away the tax breaks for any company who is shipping jobs overseas and adding to the unemployment. The tax breaks were given to keep jobs here and this is not happening so they should lose their tax breaks.
Posted by: talmag | September 18, 2011, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
THEY WERE HIGH!!!
Posted by: Praca Bielsko-Biała | September 29, 2011, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm