Sep 12, 2011 5:33pm

Erskine Bowles, Alan Simpson Challenge Super Committee to “Go Big” with Deficit Reduction

Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, the co-chairs of last year’s Fiscal Commission, challenged the Super Committee to “Go Big” and surpass its $1.5 trillion deficit reduction goal.

“As you begin your important work to reach a deficit reduction agreement, we urge you to ‘go big’ and develop a large-scale debt reduction package sufficient to stabilize the debt as a share of the economy,” reads a letter from Bowles, Simpson and more than 60 other business experts to the Super Committee, which is charged with reaching a debt-reducing compromise this fall. 

“We believe that a go big approach that goes well beyond the $1.5 trillion deficit reduction goal that the Committee has been charged with and includes major reforms of entitlement programs and the tax code is necessary to bring the debt down to a manageable and sustainable level, improve the long-term fiscal imbalance, reassure markets, and restore Americans’ faith in the political system.”

Simpson, a former Republican senator from Wyoming, called the Super Committee’s $1.5 trillion goal “peanuts” compared to what’s actually needed to effectively reduce the deficit.  Last year, the Fiscal Commission developed a plan to reduce the federal deficit by $4 trillion in 10 years, but it failed to obtain the supermajority votes needed to pass.

The commission’s proposal contained bold initiatives such as raising the eligibility age to receive Social Security to 69 and increasing the gas tax by 15 cents a gallon, along with making cuts to Medicare and slashing tax rates for corporations and the wealthiest in the country.

“When we put this out, they laughed. They all sat around and chuckle and said, ‘Boy these guys are goofy came up with something here that can’t possibly work,’” Simpson said.

“The $4 trillion number that Al brought up is not a number that we’ve made up.  I’ve said often that we didn’t get to that number by a No. 4 bus passing us on the street,” said Bowles, who served as President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff.  “Four trillion is not the maximum amount we need to do.  It’s not the ideal amount.  It is the minimum amount we need to do is stabilize the debt.”

Bowles and Simpson warned that the Super Committee must exhaust all options when determining where to make cuts in spending because the luxury of time has run out.

“We don’t have that luxury anymore.  We need to act and we need to act now.  We need to do this to reassure the markets,” Bowles said.  “Everything’s on the table, and for us to reach this grand bargain everything must be on the table if we’re really going to address our long term fiscal problems.”

“We’re here to talk to you,” Simpson said. “We don’t do B.S., and we don’t do mush, and if you’re looking for B.S. and mush just watch every congressperson who talks about cutting the deficit and telling you nothing about how to do it.”

User Comments

Actually, they should be looking for at least 3.5 trillion in cuts, and that’s WITHOUT Obama’s new jobs spending proposals, which would require another 1/2 trillion in cuts.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 12, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

The Highest Net Worth Individuals now account for just ONE PERCENT of American citizens. These are Americans who have accumulated TRILLIONS in invest-able assets – this is money beyond vacation homes, gems, jets and other expensive toys. Peanuts Mr. Simpson?

The taxes on incomes they do claim are lowered because of special loopholes on capital gains and unrealized asset appreciation.

Right now our nation’s unemployed need help. We’ve given the High Net Worth Individuals special breaks for decades. It’s time for them to participate at a higher level so we can afford to rebuild subways, potholed roads, the electric grid. All requiring JOBS.

Posted by: green.goddess | September 12, 2011, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

The Big Lie continues. Here are the ONLY numbers that matter:

The budget for 2011: 3.8 Trillion dollars.
The expected revenue for 2011 2.1 Trillion dollars.
The amount of NEW debt that will be created just THIS year (not even including this pie in the sky “jobs” plan): 1.7 Trillion dollars.
The supposed deficit reduction this so-called Super Committee is working on? 150 Billion. 0.15 Trillion dollars. (The Big Lie… That 1.5 Trillion number is spread over TEN YEARS!).
Amount of NEW debt that will be created THIS YEAR ALONE, EVEN IF THEY FIND the laughable 1.5 Trillion-over-ten-years in cuts (far from guaranteed): 1.55 Trillion dollars. 1.55 Trillion Dollars of NEW debt, JUST THIS YEAR!

And you wonder why no new jobs are being created? DUH!

How long are you going to let your government go on destroying the value of YOUR wealth. Never mind ranting about the so-called “rich”. The government is making everyone including YOU poorer, every single day, with no end in sight! How much longer are you going to stand for it?

Taxation is not the answer… you can’t tax yourself out of debt any more than you can spend yourself out of debt. What is needed is MASSIVE cuts in spending… The budget needs to be cut by 40% *PER YEAR*. not the ridiculous lie of “over 10 years”, JUST TO BREAK EVEN! so that they’re not adding any NEW debt. To start paying it off, they need to cut spending by AT LEAST 50% (total budget of 1.9 Trillion), and then KEEP cutting every year after that.

Just 10 years ago, at the start of the fool Bush’s terms, the budget was a mere 1 Trillion. In 10 years, it’s gotten totally out of control and almost quadrupled. Do you morons actually believe that you can even come remotely close to taxing enough to cover that kind of insanity? Try this… over the next 10 years, you quadruple your spending… now go to your boss and tell him that you want your wages quadrupled to cover it. Have fun looking for a new job!

Bush was awful. Obama is worse. Neither party is innocent. They’re destroying your wealth. On purpose. They know exactly what they’re doing. How much longer are you going to stand for it, people?

Posted by: Offsuit | September 13, 2011, 2:57 am 2:57 am

Posted by: green.goddess—That 1% do pay, from their income, we don’t tax wealth until you die. The people would rather have food stamps instead of good roads, healthcare instead of public transportation, and the nations unemployed will continue to be unemployed for as long as they are uncompetitive on the global market. Average isn’t good enough for the 21st century, that means lots of average people who 50 years ago would have been middle class will now be poor, and there is nothing the government can do about it.

Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 13, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.