New Study Underlines Unfulfilled Promises of Health Care Bill

Getty Images
A new study by the Kaiser Family Foundation underlines that many of the promises surrounding President Obama’s health care legislation remain unfulfilled, though the White House argues that change is coming.
Workers at the Flora Venture flower shop in Newmarket, NH, remember when presidential candidate named Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., promised that their health care costs would go down if they elected him and his health care plan was enacted.
On May 3, 2008, the president told voters that he had “a health care plan that would save the average family$2,500 on their premiums.”
Last year workers at the flower shop saw their insurance premiums shoot up 41 percent.
“I basically work for the health care payments,” says manager Pat Cowhig, whose husband has medical issues.
The Kaiser Family Foundation shows family premiums topped $15,000 a year for the first time in 2011, increasing a whopping 9% this year, three times more than the increase the year before. The study says that up to 2% of that increase is because of the health care law’s provisions, such as allowing families to add grown children up to 26 years old to their policies.
So what about that $2,500 in savings the president pledged? White House deputy chief of staff Nancy-Ann DeParle insists families will see that savings — by 2019.
“Many of the changes in the Affordable Care Act are starting this year, and in succeeding years,” DeParle told ABC News, “and by 2019 we estimate that the average family will save around $2,000.”
DeParle said that the “big increases that occurred last year were probably driven by insurance plans overestimating what the impact would be and maybe trying to take some profits upfront before some of the changes in the Affordable Care Act occur.
The Kaiser study also indicates employers are switching plans and shifting costs onto employees. Half of workers in smaller firms now face “deductibles of at least $1,000, including 28 percent facing deductibles of $2,000 or more,” according to the study.
Flora Venture’s new policy increased the deductible employees pay to $5,000.
Doesn’t that fly in the face of the president’s promise that “if you like your health care plan you can keep your health care plan”? ABC News asked DeParle.
She said no — the president wasn’t saying the legislation would guarantee that everyone can keep his or her preferred plan, just that the legislation wouldn’t force anyone to change.
“What the president promised is that under health care reform, that he would make it more possible for people to have choices in these (health insurance) exchanges,” DeParle said. “And that’s going to be what will help businesses bring costs down. Right now, they’re just struggling. That’s one reason why they’re shifting costs to employees.”
DeParle said that “once health care reform fully takes hold in 2014 and beyond, employers will have more tools and more ability to help bring down costs,” she said, including the new health insurance exchanges.
-Jake Tapper

Email
Republicans Duke it Out in Arizona
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
Obama lies… Americans DIE
OBAMA_______VS_______AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | September 29, 2011, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
“So what about that $2,500 in savings the president pledged? White House deputy chief of staff Nancy-Ann DeParle insists families will see that savings — by 2019.”
I predict Gitmo closes first.
Posted by: Horrorscope | September 29, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
ABC reporters need to question administration officials and congress, Republican or Democrat, who claim specific dollar changes will be felt 8 years down the road like White House deputy chief of staff DeParle says. If the average family will save $2000 by 2019, I want to see the crystal ball she uses. It is one thing to predict changes for next year, but an entirely different bag of tricks to claim what will happen 8 years from now. The public is not that gullible any more.
Posted by: David | September 29, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
So costs are going to go down start in 2014 and we will see savings compared to 2008 by 2019.
And this is what the Democrats fought so hard for? What a nightmare
Posted by: Denbo | September 29, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
So costs are going to go down start in 2014 and we will see savings compared to 2008 by 2019. And this is what the Democrats fought so hard for? What a nightmare Posted by: Denbo | September 29, 2011, 2:25 pm.
Why not ask “and this what the Republicans fought so hard against?”
Posted by: Searambler | September 29, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Thank you Jake for another well writen article. Keep them accountable! :)
Posted by: debra | September 29, 2011, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Why couldn’t the Democrats create INSTANTANEOUSLY cheaper and more widespread health insurance coverage?
I mean the Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really?
Posted by: Bart | September 29, 2011, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
“Why not ask ‘and this what the Republicans fought so hard against?’” – Posted by: Searambler | September 29, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Because now is reality. 2019 is at best what MIGHT happen. But once the Supreme Court makes compliance purely voluntary all this will be academic.
Posted by: Publius | September 29, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
“I mean the Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really?” – Posted by: Bart | September 29, 2011, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Well, the “hope” died a while ago. But its refreshing for someone to finally admit the “change” was a lie.
Posted by: Publius | September 29, 2011, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Keep voting for Obama and you’ll will absolutely see less and less of your paycheck. WE are the government. WE pay for all these ridiculous programs.
Posted by: s | September 29, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Passing legislation to expand coverage using private insurance instead of doing absolutely nothing to expand coverage is a big change.
Posted by: SKIP | September 29, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I mean the Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really?
Posted by: Bart | September 29, 2011, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Good questions.
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
SearamblerOne…he’s a true liberal: Call him (and his party folk) out on something and you get nothing but an attempted diversion in response. I CAN’T wait until the presidential debates next fall. The president will be called out on his failed economic policies and he’ll give a five minute answer about how HE got bin Laden. He’ll be called out on his divisive, class warfare rhetoric (and policy proposals) and he’ll talk about health care reform. He’ll be called out for doing nothing about illegal immigration when he and his party controlled Congress and he’ll take about the need for civil discourse! Go figure. He’s one of the stupidest geniuses in D.C.
Posted by: s | September 29, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Posted by: s | September 29, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I mean the Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
I can’t wait to see Mitt [job killer] Romney get called out on his supposed skills at creating jobs when he’s a literal pro at packing them up and shipping them overseas instead.
Posted by: SKIP | September 29, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
And you people believed him,LOL. Hows that “CHANGE” working for you???
Posted by: billy bob | September 29, 2011, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Wow. Just….wow.
Posted by: wildblueyondergoAF | September 29, 2011, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
2019??? Did she say 2019??? As an employer I guess I will just wait until 2019 to start hiring people.
Posted by: billy bob | September 29, 2011, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Actually, by 2019, how many people will be bankrupt and unable to afford ANY health insurance? And so it’s okay for insurance companies to gouge consumers NOW, to build their profit nest egg NOW, and we’ll see where everyone’s at come 2014? How do people pay more than $1000 a month for healthcare? The insurance companies are going to come out on top of the steaming pile. Wait and see.
Posted by: wildblueyondergoAF | September 29, 2011, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Obama has demonstrated himself to be a liar, time and time again.
ObamaCare is the most monstrous bill ever passed……but then, look at how Obama passed it. He paid off, under the table, members of his own party, to get enough votes to pass it!
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 29, 2011, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
who ever the republican nominee is i wouldnt even bother to debate obama as anything he says will never be reality. i would run against obamas record and its speaks for itself.why bother debating a party that is in denial and completely out of touch with 60% of americans. we know we have hard work ahead and we dont need it watered down by liberal theology. they had their chance and failed miserably.
Posted by: catman | September 29, 2011, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I stopped listening to the WH drivel on Obamacare a long time ago. Nothing they claim, or have predicted, has been borne out by the facts.
Every time they make claims about Obamacare, they are incongruent with what the average person is experiencing as a result of this nightmare legislation.
Posted by: Greg | September 29, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
The government doesn’t have to do anything about health coverage, Protecting against Communicable Diseases are in the General Wellfare, Chronic Disease, Cancer and Diabetes aren’t.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 29, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I mean the Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Anybody?
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
can’t believe jim has such a selective memory. all of this criticism from someone who probably supports the trial lawyers, vilifies those who want tort control, and flatly rejects any possibliity of introducing reforms that would allow for more competition among insurances. all of this criticism from someone whose party of choice can’t even get a budget passed. all this criticism from someone whose party sat on a huge majority and accomplished squat EXCEPT for producing a product that skyrockets the price of health care. by the way jim, if you don’t have a good grasp of the FACTS, don’t be so quick to enter the debate!
Posted by: ncarrizo | September 29, 2011, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Posted by: ncarrizo | September 29, 2011, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
The Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Posted by: Jim—Healthcare is a personal responsibility, they didn’t need to do anything, they don’t need to do anything. The is no Constitutional Mandate saying they need to do anything. Because of that they can’t do anything.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 29, 2011, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Posted by: Jim—-If you want healthcare compete for it, it is as simple as that. If you want health care don’t pigeon hole yourself into a minimum wage job. If you want health care pay for it, if you can’t pay for what you can afford, for some it will be the latest and greatest treatment, for others it will be Aspirin and NyQuil.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 29, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Wow. It is going up $1500 a year, but she says it will go donw $2500 by 2019? How comforting. These people are crooks.
Over 85% of American Citizens were HAPPY with their health insurance before Obama and company stuck their noses in. I wonder what the numbers are now.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | September 29, 2011, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
unfulfilled promises = lies
Posted by: foggy | September 29, 2011, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
I wonder, will that predicted/estimated/completely-made-up savings of $2000 be in 2008 dollars, shaky 2011 dollars, or worthless, hyperinflated 2019 dollars? Or maybe she meant 2000 yuan.
Posted by: Dave | September 29, 2011, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
The first tip to anyone paying attention was the name of the legislation: “The Affordable Health Care Act.” In case you are new to this game, if you really want to know what legislation does, just take the opposite meaning, or: “The Unaffordable, Non-Improvement to Health Care Act.”
Posted by: wantingbalance | September 29, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
“The Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.”———-What a laugh. And the dems? increase the national debt by 30% in three years. Now that is just great!
Posted by: jonny | September 29, 2011, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
The Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Hilarious, not a single accomplishment, never mind a list of accomplishments, posted by any Republican supporter.
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
SearamblerOne…he’s a true liberal: Call him (and his party folk) out on something and you get nothing but an attempted diversion in response. I CAN’T wait until the presidential debates next fall. The president will be called out on his failed economic policies and he’ll give a five minute answer about how HE got bin Laden. He’ll be called out on his divisive, class warfare rhetoric (and policy proposals) and he’ll talk about health care reform. He’ll be called out for doing nothing about illegal immigration when he and his party controlled Congress and he’ll take about the need for civil discourse! Go figure. He’s one of the stupidest geniuses in D.C. ———————– Anyone who expected the health care law to decrease premiums overnight is living in a fantasy land. At least now there’s a chance that premiums might go down in the future. Leaving things they way they had been would have only been worse. I’m not a fan of the health care reform that was passed because it still leaves insurance companies in charge, but it’s a start. The Republicans have done nothing about health care. I also can’t wait for the presidential debates because I fully expect the president to run circles around the republican candidate and then feed that candidate his or her lunch. It should be like taking candy from a baby. Oh, and bin Laden was caught on Obama’s watch.
Posted by: auntiedancer | September 29, 2011, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Actually, in 2004/2005, the Republicans passed major changes to Medicare Part C and insituted Medicare Part D, both of which have become highly popular with seniors, have come in billions and billions of dollars under budget, have saved lives according to recent research, and have possibly lowered Medicare Part A and B costs. In 2012, the average premiums for both will be lower than in 2011. Basically they work the way Ryan proposes RyanCare work. ——————– Medicare Part D is a joke. It’s useless for people who have high drug costs; the premiums and copays for a lot of drugs have skyrocketed in a few short years, and Part D was passed by the republicans with no way to pay for it. I haven’t heard anything from Medicare about my mother’s Medicare premiums going down for 2012, and to be honest, I hope I don’t. That premium is nothing compared to her other coverage. I have, however, already received notices from BCBS that her supplemental medical coverage and Part D premiums will be increasing. Again.
Posted by: auntiedancer | September 29, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Actually, in 2004/2005, the Republicans passed major changes to Medicare Part C and insituted Medicare Part D, both of which have become highly popular with seniors
Posted by: Dennis Byron | September 29, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Oh yes, Medicare Part D is Bush’s unpaid for seniors drug program that is anticipated to add between $800 BILLION and a TRILLION dollars to the national debt in it’s first 10 yea
Isn’t that part of the ongoing deficits and debt for which the Republicans blame and attack President Obama ?
Republicans once more talking out of both sides of their mouths.
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
As time goes on and more and more Americans begin to figure out this “healthcare bill” is more a “bill of goods”, there will be real disillusionment. Of course, there will always be some people of the hardcore Left that will continue to remain in denial. I guarantee it’s coming.
Posted by: newcountryman | September 29, 2011, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Simply put, this so called healthcare bill has nothing in it that calls out insurance companies and holds them accountable for premiums and healthcare costs. Wake up!
Posted by: newcountryman | September 29, 2011, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
“Hilarious, not a single accomplishment, never mind a list of accomplishments, posted by any …”
30% increase in the national debt Great democrat accomplishment! A liberal should be so proud!
Posted by: jonny | September 29, 2011, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Medicare Part D was Ted Kennedy’s baby. He never complained once about the debt it added, nor did he care.
Posted by: Jenn | September 29, 2011, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
I believe the load is on the back of the middle and working class, the ones who are managing and many barely to provide their own. It takes voodoo math, if you ask me, to explain how they’re going to save the promised $2,500 8 years from now as the rates resolutely continue to go up.
This is most advantageous to the major insurance companies, whose own irresponsibility and greed created a healthcare crisis. They’re poised to receive billions in subsidies along with a mandatory pool of the most healthy and young to pay into their system and compensate for others’ expenses. That’s not to mention the benefits gained by the pharmaceutical companies, who likewise have acquired some excellent benefits.
This strikes me as another case of corporate welfare that’s similar, though less of a magnitude, to the trillions of dollars funneled to Wall Street several years ago through bipartisan effort. But we’re supposed to be grateful for the universal coverage and stupid if we’re not by most Democratic standards.
Posted by: jane r. | September 29, 2011, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
This is interesting….
Jul 16, 2009 5:48pm
President Obama Continues Questionable “You Can Keep Your Health Care” Promise
ABC News’ Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report:
At a rally in Holmdel, New Jersey, today, President Obama continued making a promise about health care reform that he has acknowledged isn’t literally true.
“Let me be exactly clear about what health care reform means to you,” the president told residents of the Garden State. “First of all, if you’ve got health insurance, you like your doctors, you like your plan, you can keep your doctor, you can keep your plan. Nobody is talking about taking that away from you.”
But last month, as the president acknowledged during a press conference, he doesn’t literally mean that you are guaranteed to be able to keep your health care plan, and your doctor, if and when health care reform passes.
“When I say ‘If you have your plan and you like it,… or you have a doctor and you like your doctor, that you don’t have to change plans,’” the president said after we asked him about this, “what I’m saying is the government is not going to make you change plans under health reform.”
Importantly, the government might create circumstances – say, a public health care option that is less expensive since profit is not a concern and overhead is lower – where you might find your business forcing you into that public plan.
Pressed by Diane Sawyer in an interview that same day, the president acknowledged this, saying, “I can’t pass a law that says, ‘I’m sorry, employers, you can never make changes to the health care plans that you provide your employees.’ What I can say is that the government is not going to force you to, your employer or you to join a government plan, for example. If you’re happy with it, and your employer’s happy with it, keep it.”
At the ABC News’ health care forum with the president the next night, the president made a slightly different claim that “if you are happy with your plan, and if you are happy with your doctor, we don’t want you to have to change.”
In the audience was John Sheils, senior vice president of The Lewin Group, a health care policy research and management consulting firm, who estimated that up to 70 percent of those with private insurance would end up on the public plan.
“There are a whole series of ways that we could design this,” the president responded, arguing that employers would be given a “disincentive” to shift their employees to the public plan.
-Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
So, you can keep your insurance, until you can’t. And your employer can continue to provide that very insurance, until they don’t. And Obama can feed you a line of crap, until he gets caught.
Posted by: Shoe | September 29, 2011, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Jake, why didn’t you insist that Nancy-Ann DeParle produce her estimate’s methods? Is she just making it up? Please follow up…
Posted by: Scott P | September 29, 2011, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
So republicans had control of congress for 12 years big deal. How many years have the democrats have been in charge of congress since WW11 I would venture to say most of them and what did they do about the topics you mentioned. All the dems want to do in create more dependence on the federal government so that they can control the people. Give a man a fish and you own him, teach a man to fish and he is his own man…
Posted by: Trailwood | September 29, 2011, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
“This is most advantageous to the major insurance companies, whose own irresponsibility and greed created a healthcare crisis.”
Posted by: jane r. | September 29, 2011, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
What greed? Google “Industry Browser – Healthcare – Health Care Plans – Company List”. The average net profit margin across the entire industry is 4.5%.
Internet Information Providers average 23.9%. Personal Computer manufacturers average 16.2% (Apple Computer’s pre-tax profit margin is over 30%). Even the soft drink beverage industry averages 15%.
If greed is your concern, you’d better start boycotting Apple.
Posted by: Chuck | September 29, 2011, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
So let me see now, by 2019 a typical family will see a savings of $2,500 a year. But by then insurance could have gone up to $25,000 a year! So that same family now paying $15,000 a year will be paying $22,500 in 2019! That makes me feel much better!!!!!! Ouch!!!! Obamacare is a LIE, Obama is a joke!!!!! Liberal Democrats have LIED about everything!!!!!!! – Many people are working for health care coverage, not wages! Obamacare changes NOTHING!!!!
Posted by: RadioMan77 | September 29, 2011, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Wow…did I miss the pretty big #### deal?
All of a sudden my health costs are up.
A gouge here and a gouge there.
If I walk by a desk there’s another co-pay & deductible.
Posted by: Jim Dandy | September 29, 2011, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
I see the lyin-sack Liberals are re-writing the history of Medicare Part D …AGAIN!
Medicare D was originally proposed by AL GORE during the 2000 campaign. Gore DARED Bush to devise his own plan. Medicare D was a campaign promise kept – unlike the current TelePrompter Stooge who criticized Bush and debt before adding $4 TRILLION in 3 years and “promised” to close Gitmo.
Keep spinning Libs…
Posted by: Pelosi Schmelosi | September 29, 2011, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
who criticized Bush and debt before adding $4 TRILLION in 3 years
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++======
I think somebody else is spinning…by taking liberties with the figures. Obama added about $1.5 trillion in NEW DEBT, that is debt that was not prior obligations.
Keep spinning right-wingers.
Posted by: skip | September 29, 2011, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
The Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Still waiting . . . .
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2011, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
The people were totally opposed to this health care plan, from the git-go, and most of us are not at all surprised, that it is failing to live up to its claims.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 29, 2011, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
The premium I pay for my child-only policy has gone up 4 times since the Act and the deductible has gone up three times.. Every time, the reason mention in the letter outlining the increase was the Act.
I also pay a Washington State run health care insurance policy for myself. It covers everything but has a cap of $100,000 a year. I supplement this with a “catastrophic-only plan”.
BOTH of these plans will be eliminated when the Act comes to full fruition in 2013-2014. The State plan because the “cap” will no longer be legal and the “catastrophic plan” because it does not qualify as a “Qualified Plan” under the Act.
The plan for me and my son that I will have to buy on the “exchanges” will be $878 a month minimum according to the Kaiser Foundation. Almost DOUBLE of what I pay now for my two plans.
Please, someone tell me how the Act has helped me? I see that the private, free market system along with the States can find a solution for everyone. Why then the insistence that the Federal Government control health care?
Posted by: Alan Davidson | September 29, 2011, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
The Kaiser Family Foundation shows family premiums topped $15,000 a year for the first time in 2011, increasing a whopping 9% this year, three times more than the increase the year before.
The study says that up to 2% of that increase is because of the health care law’s provisions, such as allowing families to add grown children up to 26 years old to their policies.
___________________________________________
Did anybody read that last sentence? The Kaiser study says only 2% (or less) of the increase is because of Obamacare.
A full 5% is for other reasons.
Posted by: Jude | September 30, 2011, 12:05 am 12:05 am
The Kaiser Family Foundation shows family premiums topped $15,000 a year for the first time in 2011, increasing a whopping 9% this year, three times more than the increase the year before.
The study says that up to 2% of that increase is because of the health care law’s provisions, such as allowing families to add grown children up to 26 years old to their policies.
___________________________________________
Did anybody read that last sentence? The Kaiser study says only 2% (or less) of the increase is because of Obamacare.
A full 7% is for other reasons.
Posted by: Jude | September 30, 2011, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Posted by: Jude | September 30, 2011, 12:06 am 12:06 am
How about a little common sense? America has NEVER offered universal HC to its’ citizens. A much compromised bill passed last year as the first effort to remedy the fact that millions are w/o adequate, affordable care. Many of the mechanics are still being worked out and the full effect isn’t due until 2014 at the earliest. Who in their right mind expects this gigantic feat to be accomplished any quicker than it’s happening; especially given the amount of GOP obstruction and unwillingness to even talk about the uninsured. If we were united in this effort, we would indeed see faster progress and even a reduction in costs which is a major factor that was lost in the compromise.
Posted by: MikeInCarolina | September 30, 2011, 12:25 am 12:25 am
Way to go, ABC News – you refused to vet this community organizer, continue to carry water for him, and only now are realizing the damage he has done to America.
Posted by: higgins1990 | September 30, 2011, 1:48 am 1:48 am
only now are realizing the damage he has done to America.
Posted by: higgins1990 | September 30, 2011, 1:48 am 1:48 am \
Obama hasn’t done even a tiny fraction of the damage done under the Republican Bush administration. Who ‘vetted’ him and failed so miserably?
Posted by: Jenna | September 30, 2011, 2:00 am 2:00 am
“Give a man a fish and you own him, teach a man to fish and he is his own man… — Posted by: Trailwood”
Let a man make his choices, you can’t control him.
Legislate a man’s choices so he has to make the choices you “approve” of; you own his free will.
Oh wait, that wasn’t the point you were making at all… so how am I “my own man” when the only choice I can make is the one you’ve legislated to me again? Oh yes, I’m not… but you want to pretend this is better instead of removing choices to force me into a specific action that you determine I should be doing regardless if I want to or not.
How is making all my choices for me not :”owning” me? Or do you not bother to think about your idiotic bumper sticker style slogans before appending them to your comments?
Posted by: ertdfg | September 30, 2011, 2:29 am 2:29 am
“Did anybody read that last sentence? The Kaiser study says only 2% (or less) of the increase is because of Obamacare.
A full 7% is for other reasons.
Posted by: Jude | September 30, 2011, 12:05 am 12:05 am”
——-
Ok, so the plan that was promised to “bend the cost curve downward” instead “bent the cost curve upward” and your defense is “well it’s only costing you 2% more than you would have owed otherwise; that’s close to saving you money… really?
Fine, send me 2% of every paycheck you make for your entire life… and you can thank me for “almost” saving you money in this deal.
That’s an awesome deal and you’re going to thank me for offering to take 2% of your paycheck for the rest of your life; right? Or is taking 2% not the same as saving you money now? I thought you just said 2% was just like a negative percent in your book, right?
Posted by: ertdfg | September 30, 2011, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Ok, so the plan that was promised to “bend the cost curve downward” instead “bent the cost curve upward” and your defense is “well it’s only costing you 2% more than you would have owed otherwise; that’s close to saving you money… really?
Posted by: ertdfg | September 30, 2011, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Not at all, my point is the bulk of the cause of the increases in premiums has nothing to do with Obamacare – and that this information is ‘buried’ it the article. In other words, its a slanted piece of writing.
The writer starts with an example that is WAY outside of the Kaiser study’s findings (the flower shop) and buries the actual 2% finding of the Kaiser study way down in the piece.
Posted by: Jenna | September 30, 2011, 2:53 am 2:53 am
Ok, so the plan that was promised to “bend the cost curve downward” instead “bent the cost curve upward” and your defense is “well it’s only costing you 2% more than you would have owed otherwise; that’s close to saving you money… really?
Posted by: ertdfg | September 30, 2011, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Not at all, my point is the bulk of the cause of the increases in premiums has nothing to do with Obamacare – and that this information is ‘buried’ in the article.
In other words, its a slanted piece of writing.
The writer starts with an example that is WAY outside of the Kaiser study’s findings (the flower shop) and buries the actual 2% finding of the Kaiser study way down in the piece.
Posted by: Jenna | September 30, 2011, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Yes it is true. This year mine increased about that same amount with the exception of my deductible. Went from $500 to $2500… THANKS AGAIN OBAMA
Posted by: Thinkingsmart | September 30, 2011, 7:04 am 7:04 am
Yep, change is coming. They’re on track to fulfilling single payer once they (purposely) flub this monstrosity of a law.
Posted by: Hawk777 | September 30, 2011, 7:50 am 7:50 am
I would say most of us did not get to keep our insurance we like because of obama. He lied.
Posted by: tinkerthinker | September 30, 2011, 7:52 am 7:52 am
“What greed? Google “Industry Browser – Healthcare – Health Care Plans – Company List”. The average net profit margin across the entire industry is 4.5%.
Internet Information Providers average 23.9%. Personal Computer manufacturers average 16.2% (Apple Computer’s pre-tax profit margin is over 30%). Even the soft drink beverage industry averages 15%.
If greed is your concern, you’d better start boycotting Apple.”
That’s clearly Apples to oranges; pardon the pun. I’ve never seen a justification linking the astronomical, bubble-like profits of the computer and cell phone industries to the established
major health insurance companies; who for the most part were established decades earlier. BTW, are you quoting the data on profit gains that merged Medicare with the private entities?
According to the LA Times, in 2009 5 of the major health insurance companies had profit gains of 56% over 2008. They gained 12.2 billion dollars during that recession . I’d presume they did that by lowering their coverage by 2.7 million people who had ore serious medical issues.
In 2010, insurance companies broke profit records with an additional 22% in gains. Those are certainly sweet gains, though granted not on par with Apple. Both would certainly be good in a stock portfolio. It’s always good to mix the established and more conservative investments with the more profitable and hence, volatile ones. But of course, no one of sound mind would choose to be insured by a health insurance company whose profit margins were off the charts.
Your argument was apples to oranges. Unless someone is living with their head up in a dark and constricted space, they know that their lives are significantly less important than what’s on an actuarial sheet if their or loved ones’ lives are threatened by a catastrophic illness or event. The ruthless profiteering of insurance companies is undeniable.
Posted by: jane r. | September 30, 2011, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Typical conversation – Democrats and Liberals crying about what they want and did not get from Government (read taxpayers). Republicans and Conservatives just wanting to be left alone.
All you morons who keep reposting the “What did Republicans do?” post should realize that we don’t want Government to do a bunch of stuff. We want it to do the few enumerated things it is allowed to do by the Constitution, then stop and just leave us alone to run our lives.
Posted by: Chris | September 30, 2011, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Obama lied about this? Seriously? That is so out of character for him and his gang.
Posted by: Jack Burton | September 30, 2011, 8:53 am 8:53 am
The American people, in general, have become very gullible. Had they read the bill for themselves and been willing to listen to constructive criticism, they could have known all this before the bill was passed. NONE of this shoudl be a surprise. And despite what Obama says, it’s going to get worse, not better. And if you read the bill even now, the average American with any common sense could figure that out for themselves! This law needs to repealed IN FULL and SOON! Why do Americans vote for people who don’t read the laws that are passed before they vote for them and tell them that we’ll all be THRILLED as we all begin to read this law (including Congressman) and find out what wonderful things are in the bill. Many of the folks who pushed this bill not having read it but knowing what terrible things were in it are liars and should be impeached. It’s not just imcompetence alone – it’s outright FRAUD. And I pray we correct this and send a message to Washington in November 2012 if not before.
Posted by: Steve PA | September 30, 2011, 8:57 am 8:57 am
The Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Still waiting . . . .
Waiting for what? This thread is about the broken promises of Obamacare. If your angle is pointing out that your opponent has also had shortcomings, your argument is pretty weak. You could take that stance on any topic, it does not change the fact that Obamacare is a horrible lie that we had to listen for for the better part of a year. All of the “GOP lies” seem to be coming true as premiums continue to go up, illegals are covered, you can not keep your policies in many cases, people’s companies are dropping coverage — forcing people into Obamacare (talk to Dean). All of the issues were identified as right wing nut lies and distortions — yet here we are.
Instead of “waiting” how about you answering to these listed issues?
Posted by: FrankA | September 30, 2011, 9:09 am 9:09 am
“What the president promised is that under health care reform, that he would make it more possible for people to have choices in these (health insurance) exchanges,”…BS. He said if we liked our health care plan we could keep it. That does not mean the same as we will provide choices in the exchanges. Spin, spin,spin.
Posted by: Donna | September 30, 2011, 9:21 am 9:21 am
blame, blame, excuses, lies, more promises that won’t happen. WH has nothing but criticize America and blame since taking office.
Posted by: carol | September 30, 2011, 9:30 am 9:30 am
So by 2019 how much do you think your insurance premiums will have gone up? At 9% a year they will be about double what they are now. Then knock off $2000 and they’ll still be 80-90% higher than now. So the claim that Obamacare will lower your insurance premiums was complete bullsh*t and they knew it was a lie when they were trying to get it passed. Hopefully the Supreme Court strikes this law down so we can start from scratch.
Posted by: Scott | September 30, 2011, 9:32 am 9:32 am
This is the classic Clinton. It depends on what the definition of is is.
Posted by: billc | September 30, 2011, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Oh, I get it! You’ll lose $15k the next few years but you’ll save $2k in 2020. You can take 90% of the nation’s problems and assign it to one thing; L-I-B-E-R-A-L-S.
Posted by: Wade | September 30, 2011, 10:06 am 10:06 am
This is what happens when congress does not read a bill before passing it. & you can thank the president for shoving this bill in our face. “Just pass it” he said.
Posted by: todd | September 30, 2011, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Hopefully the Supreme Court strikes this law down so we can start from scratch.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Start from scratch doing what? -absolutely nothing like the Republicans have been doing for 30 years? If this law fails it will conclusively prove we cannot expand coverage using private insurance alone….it will be time for a public option or single payer.
Posted by: SKIP | September 30, 2011, 11:24 am 11:24 am
The Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Still waiting . . . .
Waiting for what?
Posted by: FrankA | September 30, 2011, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Amazing! The Republican supporters on this blog can’t even a single accomplishment of the Republicans during their 12 years holding the majority in Congress through to 2007.
Never mind a substantial list.
So much for the Republicans.
Posted by: JIm | September 30, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
@AuntieDance
@Jim
You are misinformed about Medicare Parts C and D. My guess is that you are not on Medicare and that you are simply repeating some Democratic talking points. I am an independent and simply look at the facts, primarily put out by MedPAC — the non-partisan arm of Congress that acts like CBO acts for the entire budget but just for Medicare.
Nationally — on the average (which is admittedly a big asterisk) — Secretary Sebilieus and CMS Director Beriwick have announed that both Part C and D premiums will decrease in 2012. The number of people on Part C has doubled since the 2006 upgrade of it by the Republican Congress to the point that one in four seniors now subscribe to a Part C plan instead of Parts A and B. The cost of D has come in 40% under the CBO estimate so far and the delta between CBO’s 10-year-estimate and actual is growing and favorable, probably not coincidentally in inverse proportion to how the CBO’s estimate of how much the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will cost vs. what it is really costing. More important, there is preliminary information that the ability of people to afford their prescriptions because of Part D is lowering Medicare Part A and Part B (fee for service hospital and doctor) costs to the Federal government.
Whoever said their mother is paying more… shop around. Rates are dropping all over the place (other than the actual Medicare Part B premium itself of course — I haven’t seen whether that will be frozen again in 2012 or go up… but it won’t go down because it’s a government-administered fee).
Posted by: Dennis Byron | September 30, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
The Republicans were in the majority in Congress for 12 years up until 2007 and what did they deliver on health coverage? On immigration reform? On regulating predatory lending? On anything really? Anything at all.
Still waiting . .
Waiting, but not actually doing any research.. of that12 year period, how many years did republicans have a filibuster proof majority? Answer ZERO.. Not do some research and see how many bills were introduced by republicans for such things as tort reform in the health industry or alowing insurance to be sold over state lines, strengthening our borders and requests for MORE border patrols, take a look at the 2004 congressional hearing on the mortgage industry where REPUBLICANS tried to get the ball rolling on controlling high risk loans only to be told by DEMOCRATS that there WAS NO PROBLEM.. they got nothing done becuase ther was NO BIPARTISIAN SUPPORT to get anything done.. (sort of like today – where republicans are introducing bills to require a balanced budget and to control spending but dems like Harry Reid are calling those bills DEAD ON ARRIVAL.. While you are waiting do a little research.. Look at how many bills were introduced during that period that were shot down… and if you really want to invest some time, take a look at which party was responsible for shooting them down..
Posted by: arkie vet | September 30, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Skip–”I think somebody else is spinning…by taking liberties with the figures. Obama added about $1.5 trillion in NEW DEBT, that is debt that was not prior obligations. Keep spinning right-wingers.”– You’re the one who’s “spinning” 1.3 trillion was the ADDED debt load for this year alone.. ALL DEBT is based on ongoing obligations..Every budget has to take into consideration what those ongoing considerations are… the DEBT laod becomes the responsibiliy of the current administration and congress.. Do you think that Clinton did not have any “ongoing obligations” in his budgets that were passed onto Bush? the outlays for Social security are passed on to EVERY NEW budget, along with Defense outlays, and mandatory spending.. the only thing that we have control over is descretionary spending.. and off budget expenses.. THOSE have skyrocketed under this adiminstration… Tarp 2 and the stimulus alone accounted for over 1 trillion in new debt.. we have tripled the length of unemployment benefits, increased food stamp programs, welfare programs, and through continuing resolutions (we haven’t actually HAD a budget since 2009) we have steadily increased spending by over 1 trillion per year…
Posted by: arkie vet | September 30, 2011, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
AUNTIEDANCER–”Anyone who expected the health care law to decrease premiums overnight is living in a fantasy land. At least now there’s a chance that premiums might go down in the future. Leaving things they way they had been would have only been worse. I’m not a fan of the health care reform that was passed because it still leaves insurance companies in charge, but it’s a start. The Republicans have done nothing about health care. I also can’t wait for the presidential debates because I fully expect the president to run circles around the republican candidate and then feed that candidate his or her lunch. It should be like taking candy from a baby. Oh, and bin Laden was caught on Obama’s watch.”– Okay, currently we have premiums based on 65% payout with coverage endin when someone reaches adulthood and preexisting conditions can be denied by private companies becuase they are too costly.. Under this bill, payout goes to 85% (which menas that companies will only have 15% of the money they receive to pay all salary and benefits, real estate, utilities, manintenance, and taxes – and profits by law), companies will now be required to cover preexisting conditions, and “children” can stay on there parents plan until ag 26..(and thats just a few of the highpoints). HOw many of you actually think this can be accomplished AND premiums will go down at any point in the process? Is anyone really that dumb?? the 85/15 rule alone will eventually cause premiums to DOUBLE.. And as for you last statement — Yep, Bin laden was caugt on Obama’s watch… USig intelligence that we got from the enhanced interrogations at GITMO that Obama opposed and condemned.. BRING on the debates..
Posted by: arkie vet | September 30, 2011, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Jake, thanks for the good practice of journalism!
The increase of premiums is by design, Pres. Obama in a 2004 video
mentioned that it will take 10 to 15 years to make the US Healthcare a
“Single Payer” system, that has been a Liberal dream for many decades.
You will hear that the increased premiums are due to the
“greedy” insurance companies, which will garner more support
foreliminating more and more private insurers. This is SO AGAINST
the virtues of LIMITED GOVERNMENT in our constitution it is almost
laughable!
Posted by: rajeve | September 30, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
So, the Affordable Healthcare Act (aka Obamacare) isn’t so affordable after all. This guy is a master at giving things names that have NOTHING to do with their names. This new ‘stimulus’ plan before Congress that’s called the American Jobs Act has no jobs in it. What it does have is $3 in permanent tax hikes for every $1 in short-term tax reductions. More taxpayer money that he’ll turn around and give to his pals in the public employee unions, Solyndra, LightSquared, and just about anyone else with their hand stretched out who donated $$ to his campaign. Oh, and don’t forget the $735 million that’s being ‘loaned’ to Nana Pelosi’s brother-in-law. Four more years!
Posted by: dwstick | September 30, 2011, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
How did this get by the editor? What? DId Obama suddenly turn conservative ro something? How dare ABC bash him, their golden boy! Just keep blaming Bush until the problem goes away! How racist and bigoted of ABC to try and hold a liberal black man accountable! YES WE CAN! CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN!
Posted by: Jason Prather | October 1, 2011, 6:29 am 6:29 am
How much will costs go up before they finally go down? Time to open markets…across state lines. Less mandatory coverage more customizable coverage. i would much rather have an HSA and a policy I can take with me from job to job and not be “reliant” on my employer to provide me options.
Posted by: EDO | October 2, 2011, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm