Sep 7, 2011 2:50pm

Reported US Troop Draw-Down in Iraq Too Severe, Senators Say

Senators Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., on the Senate floor today criticized as insufficient the Obama  administration’s reported plan to keep 3,000 – 4,000 American troops in Iraq after the deadline for withdrawal at year’s end.

While noting that there’s been no confirmation of  troop levels by the administration, the three senators  said the reported number is “dramatically lower” than what military leaders have said is needed to support Iraq.

The  US military continues to work under the assumption that they’re going to draw troops down to zero unless US-Iraqi negotiations lead to a revision that will allow a certain number of troops to stay beyond December.   But there’s also been the expectation that Iraq will need some US troops to remain to continue training of its forces, and the US military wouldn’t mind keeping troops for counterterror missions.

Iraqi PM Maliki said last month that he’d like to enter into negotiations, but there’s no telling when they’ll begin.

“Three thousand troops is dramatically lower than what our military commanders have repeatedly told us on multiple trips to Iraq that would be needed to support Iraq’s stability and to secure our mutual interests that our two nations have sacrificed so much to achieve,” McCain said today.  ”Our military leaders on the ground in Iraq have told us that in order to achieve our goal, which is a stable, self-governing Iraq, that’s a partner in fighting terrorism and extremism, they need a post 2011 force presence that is significantly higher than 3,000 troops.”

Sen. Lieberman called the plan for 3,000 troops or just slightly higher “shortsighted.”

“If it’s really only 3,000, they are not going to be able to do the job that needs to be done, and not only that, they are going to send a message of weakness, lack of resolve, anxiousness to get out to the Iraqis’ enemies and ours in the region, and that particularly includes Iran,” Lieberman said. “I don’t want us to squander what we have won, and we will, I’m afraid, if we only leave 3,000 American troops there.”

Graham urged President Obama to listen to his military commanders. “I’m not commander, but I can understand why the president would say that’s a bridge too far. I know what the generals have recommended. It goes from the mid teens to the mid 20′s, but somewhere north of 10, given my understanding of Iraq I think will work. And I know we’re broke, but the one thing I can tell you we can’t afford after all this investment is to lose.”

Traveling in New York yesterday, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta was asked about the report and the concerns by US personnel over reducing troop levels in Iraq.

“With regards to what our presence will look like on that, that is going to be a subject of negotiations with Iraqis,” Panetta said. “As I said, I can’t give you a number or tell you what that number looks like. It’s going to have to be part of the negotiations.”

ABC News’ Luis Martinez contributed to this story.

User Comments

“And I know we’re broke, but the one thing I can tell you we can’t afford after all this investment is to lose.” said Sen. Graham.

Really? Then if you can tell us how to “not lose” then you could perhaps tell us what the “goal” is so we can “Win”? Seems to me we have done all we can do, we ousted the dictator we created, destroyed and rebuild their nation’s infrastructure and emboldened their ancient enemy Iran.

Is there a “Win”? How about we stop spending our blood and treasure over there… that might be misconstrued as a “win”.

Posted by: DewyB | September 7, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Of COURSE, the 3 war Senators want to PROLONG all our wars. I just wish those 3 would lose their next election and NOT to a TEA BAGGER! We’ve WASTED Billions on a war based on LIES and now these 3 want us to stay for 20 years or so, just as they will INSIST we do in Afganistan. Waste OUR money, lives and tolerance for ANYTHING that our Government does from now on because we as a nation have lost so very much already.

Posted by: demnme | September 7, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

My overwhelming concern is the safety of our military who do remain. I’m no military genius so haven’t any real ideas of what the number should be except there must be enough to protect themselves while doing their job. I think that number should be left up to the military without interference or grandstanding from any politician.

Posted by: mal2cats | September 7, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

I would like to see them all out.

Posted by: phantomniter | September 7, 2011, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

If Obama listened to the Generals, we would still be there in 2015. We wasted many billions and thousands of lives in Iraq. It is way past time for us to be 100% out. Bush/Cheney have done enough harm to too many people. If it was not for Secret Service protection, someone would have dragged both off before the World Court.

Posted by: Bob Ramos | September 7, 2011, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Withdraw 100% of our troops immediately; that is the most sensible response. Let Iraq rule itself. Leaving 4,000 troops for ‘training’ is ludicrous. We need to let the rest of the first world countries aid Iraq with troops and money if they want the oil producton of that country. The US is in dire financial straights and we need to spend tax money building up infrastructure and fast tracking development of strong public transportation systems that will create jobs that cannot go overseas. We have wasted trillions of dollars in un-winable wars in the Middle East. Its time we recognize this fact and move on.

Posted by: RohnertPark1 | September 7, 2011, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Leave it to Obama to ignore what the generals say and do what he thinks will get him votes which will probably enable Iran take over Iraq. He is ruining our country why not Iraq too.

Posted by: Freedom | September 7, 2011, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

This is all political grandstanding by the Iraqi PM. He doesn’t want to look weak so he wants to wait as long as possible to announce the amount of troops that will be there after the first of the year. He cannot appear to look weak. So in the mean time they are screwing with the lives and minds of troops sent on a year deployment that extends past the end of the year.

I am so tired of the political BS. Just tell us the truth. Then I can figure out when my husband will be home and not have to live on what ifs. Cutting off R&R until the deal is made so some troops will get screwed but no one cares about that or the familes at home trying to live.

Posted by: Courtney | September 7, 2011, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Iran is friendly with Russia and China so imagine if they take over Iraq when we pull out. Then they would get all the equipment we have given them, the fighter jets, etc. That would be an awesome scernario.

Posted by: Courtney | September 7, 2011, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

LMAO!……. Here we go again… Republicans fighting to keep us in Iraq. ……. FOR WHAT?!!!

Posted by: Georgie_Bushie | September 7, 2011, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Actually, that draw down will simply put those remaining at serious risk. NONE should be left behind. Not one.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 8, 2011, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.