Tea Party Debate Audience Cheered Idea of Letting Uninsured Patients Die

Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul speaks during the presidential debate sponsored by CNN and The Tea Party Express at the Florida State fairgrounds, Sept. 12, 2011 in Tampa, Fla.
If it was up to Ron Paul, or many of the Tea Party audience members at Monday night’s GOP presidential debate, churches, not the federal government, would help foot the bill for the medical costs of America’s 50 million residents living without health insurance.
CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer’s hypothetical question about whether an uninsured 30-year-old working man in coma should be treated prompted one of the most boisterous moments of audience participation in the CNN/Tea Party Express.
“What he should do is whatever he wants to do and assume responsibility for himself,” Paul responded, adding, “That’s what freedom is all about, taking your own risk. This whole idea that you have to compare and take care of everybody…”
The audience erupted into cheers, cutting off the Congressman’s sentence.
After a pause, Blitzer followed up by asking “Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die?” to which a small number of audience members shouted “Yeah!”
Paul, a doctor trained in obstetrics and gynecology, said when he got out of medical school in the 1960s “the churches took care of them.”
“We never turned anybody away from the hospital,” he said. “We’ve given up on this whole concept that we might take care of ourselves or assume responsibility for ourselves. Our neighbors, our friends, our churches would do it. That’s the reason the cost is so high.”
According to census data released Tuesday, the number of uninsured people rose by about 900,000 from 2009 to 2010, bringing the total number of people living in the United States without health coverage to 50.9 million, or 16.3 percent of the population.
Texas, where GOP candidate Rick Perry has served as governor for more than a decade and Paul has served as a U.S. Congressman for more than 20 years, has more uninsured people, as a percent of population, than any other state. In the Lone Star State 26 percent of the population does not have health insurance, according to census data compiled by the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.
In 2009, the most recent year for which data is available, more than 22 million emergency room visits nationwide- or over 17 percent– were by people who did not have insurance, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, a division of the Health and Human Services Department.
While uninsured people by law have to be treated in emergency rooms, studies show that they receive poorer-quality care than people with insurance. In fact, a quality of care study conducted by HHS found that there is a greater disparity in care quality between uninsured patients and those with insurance than any other demographic indicator.
“Of the many disparities we track, insurance-related disparities are typically the largest — bigger than race, ethnicity, and income,” Ernest Moy, who oversees the agency’s National Healthcare Quality Report and National Healthcare Disparities Report, said in a statement.
At Florida Hospital based in Orlando, regional vice president Richard Morrison said uninsured patients are an “everyday occurrence.” If a man in a coma came into a Florida Hospital emergency room, as in the hypothetical used in the GOP debate, Morrison said he would “absolutely not” be turned away and would be treated the same way an insured patient would be treated.
“The hospital will take care of the individual,” he said. “And we would continue to care for him until he was discharged.”
But without insurance, the bill for an extended hospital stay would be hundreds of thousands of dollars. Because the hospital cannot serve patients with a bill that is more than 25 percent of their income, “he probably will have his bill written off,” Morrison said.
“The church could step up and help pay this person’s expense,” he said.
But as for churches footing the bill for all uninsured hospital visits Morrison said it would be “a big bite.”
“That’s a lot of money every year,” he said. “The church does step up when you have tragic situations. But it’s only a source, it’s not the source.”
In Memphis, Tennessee, there is one church that has become the source for health care for working people who do not have health insurance. The Church Health Center has been providing free health care, from routine check-ups to major surgery, to low-wage workers for more than 20 years.
“The basic idea is you’re doing a job nobody else will do,” said the center’s executive director Scott Morris. “If you get sick we think you ought to go to the front of the line.”
But Morris said the Church Health Center’s strategy could not work at a national level, because it is a community-wide effort based on relationships and trust where doctors, nurses and surgeons donate their time.
“We are a total house of cards,” Morris said. “We are built on handshakes.”
The center has a budget of about $14 million per year that is collected from charitable donations, but the yearly value of what it does is about $100 million because of all the donated services.
“We make a pretty significant dent in addressing the issues of the uninsured in Memphis, Tennessee,” Morris said. “Do we fully solve the problems of the uninsured? No. The church and the faith community cannot solve this monumental problem we have.”
Email
Republicans Duke it Out in Arizona
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
This article completely misses the point. Medical insurance and medicare are not INSURANCE. Insurance is about weighing risk. Medicare does not do that. They take bribes from doctors, pharma and heatlh providers to cover THEIR services NOT others. That is not insurance. Consumers have no choice. Doctors don’t post their prices, hospitals and drug companies don’t post their prices. It all just falls on insurance companies so rates continue to go up, doctors and hospitals continue to charge more. Because who is going to complain?? Patients?? NO! They don’t even see the price until after the service! And they don’t pay for it, their “insurance” does. It’s ridiculous. We need a free market. Can you imagine going to the grocery store and there aren’t prices on anything, then when you get up to the cash register you hand them a “food insurance” card and the grocery bills them $2400. Could you imagine the cost of groceries?
Posted by: jon | September 13, 2011, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Really good church going people aint’ they? No compassion or caring. Everyone takes responsibility for themselves? How about the elderly, the ill, the people w/o jobs? God help us all. Wake up people…If these people get in we will really know what problems are.
Posted by: Barb | September 13, 2011, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
This article MISSES NOTHING “JON”. It is exactly how the EXTREME RIGHT (and much of the Christian Right) thinks. And it the MAIN AND ONLY reason why I would NEVER consider voting for any candidate on the Right…ever again. They are FANATIC LUNATICS! This is one moderate, educated independent who will not TOLERATE such ignorance.
Posted by: CND FOX | September 13, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I am horrified that an audience would actually cheer for the death of someone. Our nation is in serious trouble if it elects an individual who has catered to a crowd that find applause and cheering the appropriate response to devastating tragedy like the one described in Blitzer’s hypothetical. I am so ashamed of these individuals.
Posted by: Lawrene | September 13, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Don’t group all church people together. How would you liked to be stereotyped? Over 400,000 churches in America and no two are alike.
Posted by: Henery | September 13, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
What a SICK group of people Republicans have become! They represent the very WORST of American society…
Posted by: tstorm | September 13, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Good point. Don’t stereotype. What if I said ALL atheists are going to hell. Oh, wait…
Posted by: Mikey | September 13, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Wonder what the word “Audience” means? One guy? Two guys? Maybe a demo plant.
Posted by: Jim | September 13, 2011, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Don’t get you bonnets in an uproar…. clearly the first cheers were for the concept of “personal responsibility” … and theh “audience erupted into shouts” portion was a few ninnies shouting “Yeah!”… listen to the clip… there were a couple of people being jerks… nowhere near the number of jerks who defaced and damaged public property in the Wisconsin State House!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 13, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The Amish pay for big medical bills through their churches all the time. It seems to work for them.
Lawrene – no was was cheering for people to die. They were cheering for people to take responsibility for themselves.
Posted by: wryview | September 13, 2011, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Rediculous, here ABC completely misses the point once more. The crowd was NOT cheering to let people die. They were cheering for personal responsibility which the majority of this group seems to have no concept of. Government is not insurance. Families should help each other, as we ALL have the responsibility to provide for ourselves and our family. Social Secuirty, The US Postal Service, Medicaid, Medicare – all government run and all miserable failures. You want them in charge of your healthcare? Not me!
Posted by: Bob | September 13, 2011, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
One thing these debates accomplish is showing the world what miserable people the Tea Baggers are.
Posted by: JR | September 13, 2011, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
This is just how the teaparty/republicans think…they are all for big business and for themselves. I just do not understand why would poor whites vote repubilcans seeing just what the they stand for. What a shame!! This Independent will not vote for another repub who will say and do anything to get elected!!!
Posted by: Vern | September 13, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
I hope the people who cheered are without insurance one day.
Posted by: Bob | September 13, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
There are so many things wrong with those quoted words I can’t even begin to contemplate how clueless Republicans are when it comes to humanity.
“What he should do is whatever he wants to do and assume responsibility for himself,”. So, if he gets into an accident or develops cancer, then that is his fault?
“That’s what freedom is all about, taking your own risk”. Freedom is about risk? Freedom is the power or right to act as one wants without hindrance or restraint – it does not assume that you automatically invoke hazardous chance as a consequence.
“This whole idea that you have to compare and take care of everybody. . .” Whatever the ending to this sentence was I don’t know, but it was probably irrelevant. So what is wrong with taking care of thy neighbor?
Posted by: Andrew | September 13, 2011, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
I read somewhere else that the question was regarding a situation where the man chose not to purchase health insurance. Not that I condone the cheering, and I agree these people are crazy, but it does make it a little different story. If a person CAN purchase insurance affordably and just chooses not to, I don’t feel like I should have to pay for their care.
On another note, this is the dumbest group of politicians assembled on one stage in history. We are doomed.
Posted by: JM | September 13, 2011, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Churches would rather build big buildings and pay their Dr Reverends big bucs than to help anyone…Example 1st Baptist Church..Picayune, MS
Posted by: JohnD | September 13, 2011, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
CNDFox/TStorm ——- Give me a break!! ——- I could give you a list of instances of REAL progressive and union thug violence over the last two years…. and you get twitterpated over a “shout”!! —- The truth is that hospitals shift the cost of people who take no personal responsibility onto the rest of us… is that soemthing they should be proud of???
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 13, 2011, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
BS! I watched the debate and that is not what happened AT ALL. ABC you are such liars and really trying to herd the sheeple…..They cheered because he said they believe in individual responsibility. That this young 30 year old guy CHOSE to not get insurance because he didn’t want to spend the $200 to $300 per month because he was young and DIDN’T need insurance, yet then he went into coma. Ron Paul said that was his choice, his risk and why not let churches/charities help out as they have ALWAYS done in the past. He just said that is what they use to do and that they didn’t let people die but why should the first line of defense be the taxpayers when this guy made a conscious decision to forego his insurance and now you foot his bill. Ron Paul said no one would die because society would work together in a charitable way to take care of this guy who didn’t want to take care of himself….so screw you ABC, no one cheered about letting anyone die. They cheered about letting people making their OWN decisions and taking their OWN risks in life…isn’t that what we want? To be left alone and allowed to make our own choices and our own risks? Or do you want all the rewards but none of the risks? You all are freaking government mooches and you know it.
Posted by: PhxSurvivor | September 13, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
This must be the Tbagger version of “Christianity”. Sick? Got cancer? No health insurance………………………TOO BAD. YOU DIE !!!!! Alan Grayson was 100% correct about these right wing clowns.
Posted by: Enzo | September 13, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Seems only the people with money won’t die these days. Insurance, even BAD insurance cost $100′s of dollars a month. So poor people listen up! Die and get out of the Tea Party’s way.
Posted by: Anon7 | September 13, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
This story will take on a life of its own because our spoon-fed society will believe what the blogs and second rate media tell them; they won’t bother to do the actual research and see that the “cheering” was actually in support of individual responsibility. This will get lost in the cacaphony of the likes of irresponsible editors at ABCNews.com (e.g., this article’s headline), Maddow, et. al.
Posted by: Rick S. | September 13, 2011, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
If this is supposed to be a anti Ron Paul peice it fails miserably! Nice try though.
Posted by: keredte | September 13, 2011, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
This is unreal coming from an American who knows better! This kind of thinking is completely and morally UNAmerican. This is STILL the United States of American and NOT nazi Germany! Shame on you all! Do some reading and research people! Try googling the word – Nuremberg Code and do some rreal reading than rather listening to Ron Paul! You will hope that someday, someone will do all they can to take care of you medically.
Unbelievable!
Posted by: A real American | September 13, 2011, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
If you take away page 4 from the Liberal Play book, 90% of today’s left wing posters wouldn’t be able to think of something to say. Unlike the headline on this story, Ron Paul never said (a) let them die or (b) let the churches take care of them…THEM being those who elect to not have coverage but can afford it. Those who can’t afford it are alrady covered under Medicare. As for the timing of the crowd comments, it could be easily misunderstood since the Paul provided an answer and a related comment to a single question. The big lie is that any person who has no insurance and CANNOT pay does not receive medical care and that is incorrect. Every state and the majority of counties and cities have a tax relationship with one or more medical facilities (Dallas has its hospital district) that funds medical care for the indigent. If you are not indigent and will not insure yourself or subsequently pay for your medical costs, then you take your chances. Not everyone without insurance who requires medical care dies for not receiving it and I know of no one who died after receiving care and then NOT PAYING FOR IT.
Posted by: wantingbalance | September 13, 2011, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Anybody that even considers voting for these right wing bozos and tbaggers, has a serious mental disorder. Throwing cancer patients, teachers, policemen, firemen, firs responders, seniors, education, and students under the bus, gets a round of applause from these kooks.
Posted by: Enzo | September 13, 2011, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
So is that how the “righteous right’ thinks…. PHXSURVIVOR? Take the argumnent down into their ‘small minded fantasy world’ of ‘making a black and white point that fits their RIIG IDEOLOGY’ irregardless of what would happen to that person in real life. The point is…these people who are so ‘self-righteous’…simply have no ‘consciences’ anymore. It is just ‘all about them’. And it is this RIGID TYPE OF THINKING that will destroy the GOP/Right/conservatives.
Posted by: CND FOX | September 13, 2011, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
So where is the intensive for anyone to get insurance? And why should someone who has a job get footed the bill from taxes? This system is so screwed and is just one example of of every “free lunch” program that has bankrupted this country. What happened to the charities, family and friends to help ones in need? What has built our country great as it once was, is the freedom of choice. Dependency on a government broke program or welfare leaves no one with any incentive to get off the free program, but rather add more people. It reminds me of a Chinese Finger lock, it’s easy to go in but impossible to pull out, nor is there any reason you would want to get out. This is a numbers game that exponentially compounds itself and there is no escape, until it melts down. We are watching this play out right before our eyes. The government can not afford all this free stuff and entitlements, just look around to municipalities or other countries where this has happened. It will happen here in America if we don’t reform this mentality of a welfare state. So I ask, why should I be responsible for this uninsured 30-year old working man in coma? Where is this man’s family, friends? How about a church or charity to help raise money to help him recover? If no family and no friends and nothing else, the hard truth is he dies. It’s cold fact of life, we all eventually will die. IF you feel pity or want to help, then you can help him, or help raise money for his care. Perhaps, I may be more willing to help donate, than to be forced by government to pay the taxes that allow the caring hospital bill whatever they want.
Posted by: Common sence | September 13, 2011, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
First, listen to the clip. The cheering was primarily for personal responsibility and personal choice. Second, come to grips with the reality that the right and left share the same values – they just prioritize them differently. Republicans put personal responsibility, personal accountability, competitiveness, and independence higher on their list than Dems while Democrats put tolerance, compassion, generosity, and egalitarianism higher on their list than Repubs. Neither side deserves to be demonized by the other.
Posted by: Damie | September 13, 2011, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Reading comments like those in support of the cheers for “personal responsibility” are also stunning. I love the idea that we should all be personally responsible. It is a fabulous concept. The problem is that the folks like were in this audience think it should only apply to the “others” whoever the current stereotype to hate may be (minorities, immigrants, unemployed, etc.) The reality: We are all dependent on each other.
Those same people in the audience cheering at the devastating tragedy of another are the same people who benefit from my tax dollars to get Medicare and Social Security (which they will not give up), have roads built so they can travel to that forum, use the scientific research I help pay for to cure their ailments, have regulators ensure their neighbors don’t dump raw sewage into their yards, have police keep folks from robbing them and to have a court system that will ensure their right to voice their idiotic opinion is not removed.
Get real! These people were not cheering “personal responsibility.” They were cheering out of callous and selfish thoughtlessness. If they were in a coma without health insurance, their families would demand we do something to help. They would be the first to run to Medicaid, shirk “personal responsibility” and use my tax dollars to pay their bill.
Posted by: Lawrene | September 13, 2011, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
How am I free if I am forced (at gun point if necessary) to give my money to someone else? I would (and do) give if it is my free will choice. The majority of the folks who get govt benefits have no appreciatin for where it comes from. They think it just appears anf govt gives it too them. The free-bee mentality also ruins peoples lives. Look at how it affected the poor black community that is much worse off today than before the war on poverty. I destroys families as people rely on govt instead of the extended family. No one ever has or ever will eliminate stress from life, but the politicians can sure get a lot of votes convincing people that they can.
Posted by: Mike | September 13, 2011, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Now, there are some family values for you. Looks like their moral compass is pointing south.
Posted by: plantain_11 | September 13, 2011, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
This was probably the Pro-life crowd of the Republican party cheering… Talking out of both sides of their mouth and changing spin cycle along the way.
Posted by: threeriverscrossing | September 13, 2011, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
funny that some of these people that “will not stand” for conservative “lunatics are completely fine with abortion.
Posted by: j | September 13, 2011, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
What does a person having cancer have to do with “personal responsibility”? That’s a bunch of garbage and you tools on the right know it.
Posted by: B. Denton | September 13, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
How does like 2 people at most somehow represent an audience of over 1000 people? I’m not usually one to think “plant” or anything. But with the way some in the media are distorting things, I’m starting to wonder.
I mean when I think about it, it would be like the dumbest thing to do politically, and in no manner is what Ron Paul supported.
And the yells did seem to originate from the back.
But anyway, no point in getting worked up on that. Just don’t see how it can be reported as “the audience”.
The question itself was asked to Ron Paul, but it is a question that is being asked to every single American.
What if a guy in your local hospital was in that condition. Would you let them die, or would you try to help them?
And that is the point Ron Paul is making, and what is being ignored. We as a society are not going to let those people die, and I find this agenda to paint the American people as uncaring and selfish disgusting. No matter how much you want to take the actions of a few and stereotype it onto everyone, it is not the case.
It is a flat out lie that if not for government these people would die, and you should be ashamed of yourself for telling people that. You speak about “unity” and then you turn around and imply that we are selfish and uncaring? I’m officially offended by the entire notion.
Posted by: USS Constitution | September 13, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Why is Insurance so high? Let`s see………..Haliburton Corp………..$60 a week billed to do the laundry of a single Soldier…………$2500 for an MRI scan….$60,000.00 for a gall bladder procedure……$1000 a day for a semi-private room……..the commonality is corporate gouging of American citizens and federal government participation of it, Insurance is probably the fastest movement of money through this country and the investments that go with it on the wall street markets thus globally, high dollar insurance is what keeps the gambling tables open at wall street 24/7, it`s what balances the opposing scale pan for out of control Government spending, the Feds and Corporate take our jobs away and send them overseas leaving unemployment with no insurance behind, there is allot of arrogant gall in this ABC report to even speak about such evils.
Posted by: NewUnion | September 13, 2011, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
funny that some of these people that “will not stand” for conservative “lunatics are completely fine with abortion.
Posted by: j | September 13, 2011, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
////////////////////////////////
What I’m “fine” with is a woman’s right to choose what SHE wants to do. If you want to kick down a woman’s door and force her to do what YOU want her to do….that’s your business. Your abortion argument for defending these right wing nutjobs is really weak, by the way.
Posted by: B. Denton | September 13, 2011, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
The tea baggers are about as Christian as Fred Phelps, only instead of saying “God hates gays,” they believe “God hates the poor.” You can’t get any more anti-Christ than that.
Posted by: Fred | September 13, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
REAL —– what is “this kind of thinking”?? — If you use common sense… you see the “approval” was for “personal responsibility”… not “death”!! —- Don’t you feel like a fool being taken to the cleaners by the liberal media??
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 13, 2011, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
“After a pause, Blitzer followed up by asking “Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die?” to which the audience erupted into shouts of “Yeah!””
Ladies and gentlemen, the Tea Baggers of 2011 America!
Posted by: Searambler | September 13, 2011, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
PRO-LIFE? HA!!!! This sickens me!
Posted by: Kari | September 13, 2011, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
The questions: “should we let him die” makes no sense unless Blitzer was asking about the patient’s right to die/refuse treatment. We already have nationwide laws in place that legally require hospitals to treat emergencies regardless of whether the patient has insurance or not (it’s one reason why emergency rooms are so busy). A man in a coma would not be turned away from a hospital, as almost everyone knows … so “should we let him die” is no the same as “should we treat him” … and “should we treat him” was answered long ago by our lawmakers AND Ron Paul’s answer was inline with that – he said yes, the patient should be treated but charities – not the government – should pay the tab – which is a familiar talking point to Tea Parties. Because the question was irrelevant, I would give those applauding the benefit of the doubt and think that perhaps they misunderstood the question, as it really made no sense at all to be asking “should we let him die.”
Posted by: country gal | September 13, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
The real question posed to Dr Paul was if a healthy 30 yr old refuses to purchase medical insurance then goes into a coma, is it the governments (taxpayers) responsibility to take care of him. GET IT STRAIGHT! Your propaganda and lies cannot stop the libertarian revolution that is coming.
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Survival of the Richest. This is scary. Wake up America and stop letting the rich box you into the poverty corner.
Posted by: MAX | September 13, 2011, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
“… bringing the total number of people living in the United States without health coverage to 50.9 million … ”
Let’s just take half of the 50.9 million uninsured, let them get sick. Tea Partiers, ready to kill 25 million Americans this year?
Posted by: newz4i | September 13, 2011, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
“Republicans put personal responsibility, personal accountability, competitiveness, and independence higher on their list than Dems…” No, Damie, Republicans put greed before humans. They put more more more money for the wealthiest 1% above food and basic health care for millions of starving children. That’s the actual truth, and “personal responsibility” is just the line they use to rationalize their greed, just like “state’s rights” used to be argued to rationalize slavery.
Posted by: Pat | September 13, 2011, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
What’s REALLY hilarious about these Tea Baggers supposedly cheering for ‘personal responsibility’ is that they are adamantly 100% against it in real life. In real life, they oppose the Individual Mandate which REQUIRES people to do the responsible thing and have medical insurance. They scream “NO! You can’t make me have insurance!”. Someone asks, “But what if you get cancer?” Their reply? “Then I’ll get free health care just like all them illegals get”.
Posted by: Searambler | September 13, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Look I just want to say this and I hope someone really understand what most of the uninsured go throught. My sister works as hard as she possibly can to take care of her four daughters. She is a hair stylist. She works for a very well known shop. So No she is not a deadbeat and Yes she is a hard working tax paying American. Her husband left her and really doesn’t want anything to do with taking care of his kids the way that they need to be taken care of. She nearly works 70hrs a week just so she can get extra money in the form of tips for her services. She never gets to spend time with her girls the way that she wants and she it taking care of them all by herself. Please tell me where is she going to get the money for health insurance. She barely makes enough to pay all of her bills, make sure the girls have clothes on their backs and food on the table. The government does not assist her in anyway as far as her own personal health insurance because they say she makes too much money. Where would her girls be if they didn’t have medicaid? She is not a bum but a great mother and she will do what she can to take care of her girls. Are you saying she deserves to die if she got in a car accident and was in a coma? People think about that. Is she not taking responsibility. A large portion of the hard working American society cannot afford health insurance it’s just that simply cost too freakin much if you are not making 40000-50000 a yr. Please people lets not lose our compassion that is why I will never ever ever ever ever vote to put any Republican in office. They cater to the rich and the ignorant.
Posted by: Chrissie | September 13, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Have you listened to the entire question and to the response? Blitzer emphasized the man was healthy, had a great job, but chose not to buy any health insurance even though he could afford it. And the crowd was cheering when Ron Paul commented about freedom and responsibility. Two people at most said “Yeah” about letting him die. That’s disgusting yes, but a far cry from the “audience” cheering to let someone die.
This is why most Americans don’t trust the liberal media.
Posted by: surfergrl | September 13, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Posted by: NewUnion—Try no one pays for it at the point of service. People go to the hospital and expect to be fixed no matter the cost, so the cost is high because that is what we want, we want the most expensive treatment, we just don’t want to pay the R&D cost. Health care is like TV’s early adopters shoulder the cost and then prices drop, the people that can afford a $10,000 26″ LED TV, pay the R&D Costs so in a year or two that same TV cost $200, Health care is the same except nothing moves out of the bleeding edge category, we move from bleeding edge to bleeding edge, and there is no way to recoup the cost without high prices, because the product life cycle is so short, so we are always in the early adopter and most expensive phase. Secondly the price is high because of cost shifting, the government shafts the hospitals pharmacies and doctors with Medicare and Medicaid payments that are far below cost, so everybody else has to pay more for the provider to stay in business. Thirdly we need loser pays in the US lose you lawsuit and you have to pay for the plantif and the defendant, bring a bad lawsuit with millions of dollars worth of expensive experts and lose and you pay, drag a court case ou for years and lose and loser pays.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 13, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
The Tea Parties revised “Pledge of Allegiance”..I pledge allegiance to my darn self….and all the messed up crap I believe in….and to the Republicans….and they”d better understand….we’re divisible, screw the nation, and who needs Liberty and Justice for all”
Posted by: TW | September 13, 2011, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
It appears that there also some pretty rapidly growing and wealthy mosques in the US now who could be looked at to “step up and pay this persons expenses”
Posted by: Martin Stevenson | September 13, 2011, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
WWJD: What would Jesus de-fund?
Posted by: Eric | September 13, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
The churches should not be tax exempt! That is totally ‘old school’, and they are nothing more that social clubs. Yes, they help others (and should), but they should be taxed…even if at a lessor rate. We would have no deficit if they(churches) paid taxes.
Healthcare is an ongoing issue, ladened with fraud. It needs to be cleaned up.
Posted by: gdguynbalt | September 13, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Searambler | September 13, 2011, 3:17 pm —– You said “they oppose the Individual Mandate” —— uh, yeah… maybe because it is unconstitutional!! — DUH!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 13, 2011, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Joe wrote, “The real question posed to Dr Paul was if a healthy 30 yr old refuses to purchase medical insurance then goes into a coma, is it the governments (taxpayers) responsibility to take care of him.”
If the Individual Mandate were in place, then this would be a moot question, because that 30 year old guy would have medical insurance. Like all RESPONSIBLE people have. So if the Republicans are really FOR individual responsibility, how come they are AGAINST the Individual Mandate? It simply requires people to be the way the Republicans CLAIM they already are……..
Posted by: Searambler | September 13, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Question to surfergrl: How do you distinquish from those who can afford it and those that can’t when they come into the ER with a gun shot wound or a bad head wound from an accident?
Posted by: Chrissie | September 13, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Country Gal….your post is YOUR personal interpretation and rationalization. And your point od ‘charities’ handling such huge costs in a nation of 300 million with an unemployment (and underemployment) rate of close to 20% of the population…DOES NOT MATCH reality. Quit making excuses for the ‘ignorance of the far right’!
Posted by: CND FOX | September 13, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
the number of uninsured people rose by about 900,000 from 2009 to 2010, bringing the total number of people living in the United States without health coverage to 50.9 million, or 16.3 percent of the population.
WOW another record for the Obama administration and cronies. Enabling people has that effect on folks
Posted by: Notbuyingit | September 13, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
, but of course, that is what the Republicans are all about, survival of the fittest. It says so in the Bible, so that is the way it must be. If you are a Senior citizen without a couple of million dollars in the bank, then that is just too bad. If you don’t make enough to pay a $1,200.00 health insurance premium, then that is also too bad, you should have gotten a better job. Don’t get sick, and don’t get involved in any accidents and you may be okay.
Posted by: EffortPA | September 13, 2011, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Thank you chrissie. All media, not just liberal media. Thay all fear Ron Paul because if elected their whole false house of cards crumbles and this country is given back to it citizens where it belongs.
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Loyal —- I guess THAT will be decided by the Supreme Court. The same court that said “corporations are people”. Frankly, I don’t hold out much hope that they will do the right thing with this issue. Not with the most conservative AND activist Supreme Court in modern history……….
Posted by: Searambler | September 13, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Jon, you’re SO MISINFORMED. The doctors can (and DO) tell you, in advance, what the doctor’s charge will be for a surgery.
It’s the highway robbing insurance companies that will NOT tell you what they’ll reimburse. They’ll tell you they’ll reimburse what’s “reasonable and customary” but with no dollar amount included. You can give them a procedure code and the geographic location where the doctor is and they will still REFUSE REFUSE REFUSE to tell you what they’ll cover until AFTER the procedure has happened.
IT’S THE INSURANCE COMPANIES who have a “heads I win, tails you lose” racket going on. They want to make sure their customer is 100% healthy, they’ll charge him a fortune for premiums, they’ll charge him co-payments, deductibles and co-insurance for EVERY SINGLE PROCEDURE and then REFUSE to provide what they’ll cover IN ADVANCE of his procedure (so he can wind up with them paying the doctor a very low rate and he having to pay a very high rate of co-insurance).
Wake up America. Insurance companies are the #1 lobbying group in Washington. They’re financially raping the doctors, the hospitals and – most importantly – their customers, yet they’ll claim losses every year while paying their CEO’s record-breaking bonuses every year in the range of 20M.
It’s sick!
Posted by: Jane | September 13, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Chrissie, ever heard of soonercare????????????????? Oklahoma has insurance for children of all ages. Obamacare is socialized medicine and we dont want it no matter what the circumstances are.
Posted by: Notbuyingit | September 13, 2011, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
@loyaopposition. Mandate automatically precludes any personal responsibility. Do you know the definition of personal responsibility. If your forced to do it, you hold no responsibility, youve ceeded that to the federal government.
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
So if the Republicans are really FOR individual responsibility, how come they are AGAINST the Individual Mandate? It simply requires people to be the way the Republicans CLAIM they already are. Why can’t anyone explain this dichotomy?
Posted by: Searambler | September 13, 2011, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
There is a flaw in Dr. Paul’s reasoning. To say that being uninsured is a matter of “taking your own a risk” and “freedom” presumes the man had the money for insurance and chose to spend it on other things. Health insurance is unaffordable for millions of Americans (until 2014 that is).
Posted by: Greggw | September 13, 2011, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Jane, I have to correct you on something. See I’m on the inside when it comes to insurance companies. These hospitals and surgeons sign contracts. They know very well what that usual and customary amount is. They choose to bill way over that. You know why? Because they get tax breaks. You know where those tax breaks came from Bush 1. Read up on it.
Posted by: Chrissie | September 13, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Posted by: TW—We all have liberty, what we all don’t have is money and that is not a right and after taking care of myself and my family there is little left for the people who I don’t know or care about. I am sorry but the homeless and poor people I see are that way because of the choices they made, the choice to do drugs, not finish school, have kids you can’t afford, not save for a rainy day, or just be apathetic in the extreme. The government divides us, we are not Americans we are (Insert cultural Identity)-American, we are not Americans we are Rich Americans and Poor Americans, We are not Americans we are Democrats, Republicans, or Independents. Screw the nation, how does making everybody equally poor make the nation any better, how does taking from one person and giving to another make the country any better and it isn’t the same as commerce, you have a choice where you spend your money, no one takes it from you, how does giving food to someone who doesn’t see fit to even try and feed themselves, make the country better, how does socializing failure and reward make anything better, how does paying for the smokers and twinkie eaters healthcare make the country better.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 13, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Did anybody actually watch the debate. About to or three people shouted when Wolf mentioned death. Then Ron Paul refuted that doctors will not let a patient die. This is a prime example of the the media will mislead you. Go watch the clip and judge for yourself.
Posted by: John | September 13, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
First off, this article exaggerates the cheers from the “audience” when Ron Paul was asked if someone without insurance should be left to die. There were a handful, meaning about five or less, who cheered and shouted “Yea!”
And I’ll be honest, I think that services should be refused to anyone without insurance unless they have a job. If they have a job, garnish their wages to pay for their medical bills. People argue that it’s unconstitutional to make anyone pay for a service, but isn’t automobile insurane a requirement? I know it is in Virginia and figure it’s probably a requirement in most states. This way, if you cause an accident and you don’t have any insurance, the person not at fault is not left high-and-dry for someone else’s mistake. But that’s what happens with people who seek medical services and don’t have insurance–they go to the emergency room and leave the taxpayers footing their medical bills.
I’m young–I’m 24 years old, but I have been working since I was 14 and that was by choice. I got a work permit to start working at 14 and have been paying taxes and paying into Social Security (which probably won’t even exist once I am eligible to receive it) for 10 years now. I believe that those who have jobs and don’t have health insurance have an issue with their priorities. They either need to take a long hard look at where their priorities lie, and if they don’t see any issue, then laziness or carelessness is obviously a factor.
I worked my way through college, paid my own tuition, and have never had a problem finding a job and keeping a job. I have a family member who never went to college, but had developed skills welding and machining. He was laid off in 2009 because his job couldn’t find enough work and afford to keep all of their laborers. He was on unemployment for less than a month and was offered several positions because he was out looking for a job all day every day until he was only faced with the decision of which one he wanted more. After accepting his new job, his salary was increased by $10,400 annually.
I’m not far-right, and I’m not on the left side either. I can be considered a conservative, but I do believe that those who do not want to work and those who do not want to provide themselves choose that option. Maybe they’re lazy, maybe they have no ambition, maybe they were brought up by a family that was lazy or had no ambition themselves and inherited the trait. Maybe someone lost their job which they considered was a good job and think they are too good to work at Wal-Mart or Burger King so instead give up paying for health insurance and live off of the tax-payers’ money (aka unemployment) for a year or two. What I can tell you for sure, however, is that it should not be my responsibility to provide for someone else’s handouts nor for their medical services. I pay for my own and take responsibility for myself.
This is all about the chicken and the egg–the US economy is bad, and most Americans would have more money to put into the economy if insurance premiums and co-pays were lower. However, they can’t be lowered because medical costs are high due to the amount of people who do not pay for the medical services rendered. Why should my costs be higher when others get off scotch-free???
Posted by: OPINIONATED | September 13, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
the author of this hack peice Amy Bingham is just trying to get noticed. Maybe if she had listened to the debate she would have heard “personal responsibility” as the main point.
Posted by: MartinK | September 13, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Yes, Searambler has it correct. I watched the debate, too. That is exactly what happened. I am an independent and a christian. I believe in “love thy neighbor”. It makes me angry when so called God-loving people are hypocritical like this. There is no compassion or common sense. I watch the Repub debates because I want to be informed. And right now, if any one of these people are elected president. We are in BIG trouble.
Posted by: Terri | September 13, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
All I know is that you all better VOTE, and keep these republicans, aka teabaggers, aka right wing wackos OUT of the Oval Office. You can moan and groan about them all you want to, but if you don’t vote to keep these loony republikans out of office, all your complaining is a waste of time.
Posted by: B. Denton | September 13, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I’m lying on my death bed as I write this. Cough. Dont expect to make it through tomorrow. Cough.
Ran out of money. Cough. Doctor kicked me as he walked by. Cough. Said he needs the spce for a paying patient. Cough, cough.
Posted by: stan | September 13, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Chrissie and Snewsom2997 — You are both absolutely correct with your comments. Thank you!
Posted by: OPINIONATED | September 13, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Cnd Fox, who do you think currently pays the bills of the uninsured? Many hospitals have a charitable organization attached to pick up the bills of those who can not pay and do not have insurance. Many of the charitable organizations take donations from churches, the public, etc. I donate to the charitable organization of our local children’s hospital and our local acute care facility. Which ones do you donate to? Most of us on the right feel a deep obligation to charity that our counterparts on the left just don’t share. We donate more than 10 percent of our income to charity, volunteer for a number of good causes and get out there to work on the ground level to help our communities solve OUR problems. I understand that you probably get some sort of internal satisfaction by attacking your political opponents, but perhaps if those of you on the left shared our faith in our countrymen and joined us serving the poor, maybe the world would be a much nicer place, and conversations like this one would end with us both agreeing that of course charity should play a big part in helping the poor cover unforeseen medical expenses, while the government focuses its attentions on the bigger issues. :)) I hope you have a truly blessed day. It sounds like you need a few nice thoughts sent your way.
Posted by: country gal | September 13, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I AM NOT MY BROTHER’S KEEPER – nor is anyone my keeper. Charity can help children without the means to pay for medical services – adults can make choices. Some live, some die – sorry but that’s way the life is. LIBERALS, get over it.
Posted by: urshadow | September 13, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Insurance is unaffordable to many because they would rather spend their money on the non- necessities. Many people on food stamps and public assistance have better phones and T.V.’s than I do. It is a fact.
Try going to another country without insurance.
Posted by: dgh629 | September 13, 2011, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Sorry–I meant Snewsom2997 and John…sorry Chrissie :)
Posted by: OPINIONATED | September 13, 2011, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
The fact TX has such a high percentage of uninsured is a plus to the tea party. TX is not “interfering with the free choice” to be uninsured.
Posted by: Greggw | September 13, 2011, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
It is truly frustrating that some of the tea party would allow a man without insurance to die. That is wrong. It is a reversal of values: money before human life. At the same time I’ve talked to many liberals about abortion and they often say: “Are you going to pay to raise the child?” There are 1.2 million abortions/year in the U.S. So here too values are misplaced.
Posted by: Benjamin | September 13, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Notbuyingit, you must not have read what I wrote. I never said my sister’s girls didn’t have coverage. She can’t afford to buy it for herself. Wow read it again please. We have the same type of thing in NC as well, but kids aren’t the only ones that need to be covered. Not all uninsured are deadbeats that just don’t want to buy it. I would dare to say most of the people that don’t have coverage simply can’t afford it one way or the other.
Posted by: Chrissie | September 13, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Plastering Paul’s picture above the headlines of “let the uninsured die” is poor journalism. That is not his stance nor what he said in the debate, but ABC is attempting to portray it that way. There are many things I agree with Mr. Paul about and many things I do not, but I’m so sick of the media (all of it: CNN, Fox News, ABC, NBC, etc.) intentionally misrepresenting all the candidates’ views. Yuck.
Posted by: Voter | September 13, 2011, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
To ‘Common Sence’: First, if you’re going to uses the nick ‘Common Sence’ at least use spell check, it’s ‘Common Sense’.
At no time have the Dems argues against personal responsibility. However, the poor and yes many middle class simply can not afford the Health Insurance Premiums. And God forbid one wants to change jobs and has a ‘preexisting’ condition, most, if not all insurers won’t touch you resulting in a person being forced into an ‘Indentured Servant’ mentality simply because they may have asthma or Hi BP.
When a man says, ‘Let him die’ because he’s sick? Yes, that person deserves to be demonized.
What makes most folks mad is the Hypocrisy many of the “Republican’ Candidates. Ms Bachmann claims to be Christian but follows few, if any of the Christian values(you know, like when Jesus healed the sick or fed the starving masses. I don’t recall hearing him preach about Personal Responsibility.
Study after study after study, shows that the U.S pays MORE for Health Care(Dr. visits, Meds, etc) than any other industrial country while getting less.
Posted by: Jeff | September 13, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
No, they did not. They cheered allowing him to take his own medicine, for not getting health insurance.
The media fails to read the message properly.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 13, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
They cheer for personal responsibility and then on the other hand cry like babies because they might get taxed a bit more if they refuse to actually choose personal responsibility and purchase that insurance, thus sticking the rest of us with their bills. They don’t make sense to me. If one person cheered it was too many. I do not care the reason, I personally would not walk over somebody dying just because I felt they took some gamble in life and failed to take the proper precautions. This is way too cold for me.
Posted by: Secondlook | September 13, 2011, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Ron Paul was the smartest man on that stage yesterday. A true patriot whose vote is never for sale. Check his voting record. Look and see if he accepts money from lobbyist and special interest. Do your own homework instead of being diverted from the truth with all the liberal, tebagger, republican and democrat slight of hand. Right and left are both arms of the same machine that has stolen this country from its citizens. What rep or senator do you know who does not accept money from special interest. Bush did. Obama, a professed liberal, his largest donor in the last election was Goldman Sachs. Does that make sense? I thought the party of the rich was the Republicans? WAKE UP!!!!!
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“Cnd Fox, who do you think currently pays the bills of the uninsured? Many hospitals have a charitable organization attached to pick up the bills of those who can not pay and do not have insurance. Many of the charitable organizations take donations from churches, the public, etc.”…………………. Mostly the federal and state government. Look it up.
Posted by: Secondlook | September 13, 2011, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
SNEWOM….we’re all talking about giving something to people who don’t appreiciate, or not willing to do for themselves. We’ve become selfish..everything is me, mine and ours. I make a decent salary…not rich by any means……. I ‘m not bothered in the least that my tax $$ help people. I don’t mind at all!!!! But that’s just me.
Posted by: TW | September 13, 2011, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
It fits the republican ideology of feeding on grief. They like the idea of thinning the herd. It means that less people are taking up space on the ground and the air they breathe. Now the ignorant need to run into voting booths and reward them. Your nothing more than a herd of cattle to be exploited by them.
Posted by: rightbehind | September 13, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Could you be more transparently deceptive by showing a picture of Ron Paul with a “Yeah, I said it” look on his face and then having the misleading headline about “letting them die”, as if it were Paul who said it. Do you have a whit of journalistic integrity?
Posted by: JoeJoe | September 13, 2011, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
How can a church pay millions of dollars in medical care? Suppose a person is an atheist? This guy is a lunatic, now he has his son involved. Tell you what Ron Paul and Rand Paul, why don’t you two forgo your health benefits and pensions you so generously voted yourselves and live like the rest of us? These people have no souls whatsoever, truly evil. Is it any wonder he is behind Campaign for Liberty? That he and his son’s copywriter’s and chief of staff used to be VP of The national Right to Work Committee and their lobbyists?
Posted by: Hegel321 | September 13, 2011, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Churches are worried about whose tithes are up to date to build an even bigger church building than they are worried about caring for the sick and shut in. Ron Paul needs to stop living in the 60s.
Posted by: rippedpockets | September 13, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
The poor have Medicaid for their medical care…. senior citizens have Medicare… the rich have their own personal wealth… so what those that choose a flat-screen TV over health insurance??? — We take care of those that need it… who will stand up for personal repsonsibility for those who can take care of themselves… but don’t??? —- Obviously not the progressives…. look… Obama is planning another TAX and SPEND “spread the wealth” plan even as I write!! — So sad!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 13, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Face it folks, the “Conservative Right” would “wash their hands” and watch Jesus die. As most good Christians know, Jesus was poor and would therefore be uninsured. Pontius Pilate would be so proud. PS- Most of the cheering was from the same ones that would demand treatment, despite their insured/uninsured status.
Posted by: arryandan | September 13, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
It is incredibly disturbing to witness what America has become. I heard Ron Paul ask recently why people in Florida should have to help pay for the damage Hurricane Irene did in Vermont. The answer is quite simple: because we are ALL Americans. It is the moral thing to do – not to mention the Christian thing to do. I do not subscribe to the Christian religion, but so many of the Tea Party claim to be devout Christians. Ignorance, selfishness, and anger run deep in that group. How sad to witness the decline of this great nation.
Posted by: Steve | September 13, 2011, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Dr. Paul neglects to mention that healt serves cost a lot less in the 1960s because there wasn’t all the fancy technology and drugs back then. This whole concept that the uninsured should be left to die is class warfare.
Posted by: Greggw | September 13, 2011, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
what we don’t want…. We don’t want uninsured wasting money and time at ERs like they do now. We don’t want to rely on churches and charities which are awesome but not guaranteed and in the end amount to taxing nice people more than not-nice people and it’s not obvious to a sick person without a church to know where to go. I personally prefer to not just let them stay sick or die but I know others feel otherwise. We can’t have perfection, but anything that addresses these issues is welcome.
Posted by: JohnC | September 13, 2011, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
All Puppets. And you dont realize it!!!
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The “church” is no answer for anything. In fact, religion is one of the major problems in this world.
Posted by: Steve | September 13, 2011, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
A man or woman never complains until their own belly is empty and hurting. What it would be like to sit around and be fat and content with every need fulfilled then cast down judgments……….wrong……….people who hurt…………hurt other people. Sometimes overly self assurance is a crippling torment.
Posted by: NewUnion | September 13, 2011, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
And T Baggers wonder why everyone has such a low opinion about them!
Posted by: tstorm | September 13, 2011, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Hegel321 – “How can a church pay millions of dollars in medical care? Suppose a person is an atheist? This guy is a lunatic,” — wow. You must live in a town that doesn’t have a catholic hospital or a baptist hospital. There are many hospitals with great histories of church-based charities covering the costs of those who can’t pay. I’m assuming you’ve never heard of St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital, another hospital that uses charity to treat desperately ill children. By the way, at most religious based hospitals, there is no requirement that you believe in God to be treated – athiests are treated all the time. And churches donate to hospitals all the time. Don’t you donate your hospital’s indigent fund?
Posted by: someone new | September 13, 2011, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
@ARRYANDDAN. What you miss is that fFlorida can choose to help. We are all Americans. Right?
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“Ron Paul was the smartest man on that stage yesterday. A true patriot whose vote is never for sale. Check his voting record. Look and see if he accepts money from lobbyist and special interest”._Duh he is behind Campaign for Liberty and hired lobbyists from that right wing special interest to copyright for him, his friends hire their friends all political ploys.
Posted by: Hegel321 | September 13, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“Requiring ” insurance has another problem for some. . My wife has several pre-existing conditions, and the monthly cost of coverage from the state “pool” for “high risk” insurees would cost more than a house + car payment combined…and that was 5-6 yrs ago. If it becomes law that everyone has coverage, it would still be cheaper for her to pay a fine than to get coverage under the present system.
Posted by: Bob | September 13, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
[They chanted "Yeah!" after asking about if society should let him die. Listen to the clip, its clear as day] This is not a political issue, it is a society issue. Do people actually disagree with the idea that the first step for a society like us to evolve would be to provide healthcare to all, regardless of discriminatory factors? Our society has now deemed who is more naturally blessed based on monetary value. Some will get better care and special treatments, while others are left to wilt on their own. Future societies will look back at us and say, “wow, their greed really held back the evolution of the sciences (funding) and really held back the medical well-being of every individual in their society?” It is an embarrassment that we want to take steps backward rather than moving forward. What makes America great is not just the economic setup, it is the culture, the diversity and the society in general. Moving back the clock so we can live in one-upmanship society is a bullet to the heart.
Posted by: philosopher | September 13, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“Do people actually disagree with the idea that the first step for a society like us to evolve would be to provide health care to all, regardless of discriminatory factors?”
Yes. The ‘Religious Right’ disagrees with this philosophy. Then again, many of them don’t believe in evolution of ANY kind………
Posted by: SearamblerOne | September 13, 2011, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Why can’t we all live like Star Trek LOL! The driving force in our lives has and unfortunately always will be MONEY. Until we can figure out how to co-exist without needing it, Nothing will ever change, no matter who’s in the white house.
Posted by: David c | September 13, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
To copyright for him, not buy his vote on any issue. Check the record. Show me one of your “politicians whose vote is not for sale.
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Ron Paul wants this to be a Third World country where the poor die on the streets…notice in the Third World churches do crap and here they are too busy lining their own pockets.
Posted by: Hegel321 | September 13, 2011, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
““Requiring ” insurance has another problem for some. . My wife has several pre-existing conditions, and the monthly cost of coverage from the state “pool” for “high risk” insurees would cost more than a house + car payment combined…and that was 5-6 yrs ago. If it becomes law that everyone has coverage, it would still be cheaper for her to pay a fine than to get coverage under the present system.
Posted by: Bob | September 13, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm”…………………… This changed with Obama’s HCR. It is now at affordable prices thru the states. However, the trick is you have to have been without it for six months to qualify. Some people are taking the chance and dropping theirs for 6 months to do it.
Posted by: Secondlook | September 13, 2011, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Done with my break. I have to go back to work. You know what that is?
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Godless Evil That s all I have to say>
Posted by: Alexandra Siwek | September 13, 2011, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Hey let the military and the politicians give up their government insurance since it’s so bad!
Posted by: Hegel321 | September 13, 2011, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
personal responsibility? yeah, easy to say but how about the people who want to work but cant find jobs? and if they are lucky enough to have a job, health insurance, along with all the other cost of living expenses, is so expensive how can the average low/middle class family survive anymore? people in those situations have to choose between feeding their families or healthcare? albeit tough, whats the obvious choice? that’s responsibility. these politicians are so full of them selves and because they don’t NEED certain things, its so easy for them to say if individuals w/o coverage need help they should get it from anywhere else other than the federal government. if the health care system and pharmaceutical companies and the politicians weren’t so corrupt, and the US had a better managed, more streamlined healthcare system, maybe the healthcare system would work for the low/middle classes and not just rich politicians who are just soooo responsible. why don’t these candidates talk about solutions instead of the blame game.
Posted by: M. Carr | September 13, 2011, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Just VOTE and keep these republicans nutjobs out of office.
Posted by: B. Denton | September 13, 2011, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
We are now a country of ‘ME’. If it helps ME, I want it otherwise everyone else can go to heck.
Posted by: CAW | September 13, 2011, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Would someone please explain why the Tea Party shouted loudly (and falsely) that “Death Panels” would be an integral part of Obama’s health plan and now shouts in support of letting the uninsured die?
Posted by: Steve | September 13, 2011, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Congressmen retire with full health insurance for life. I think it’s time they lose this benefit
Posted by: Mike | September 13, 2011, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
To copyright for him, not buy his vote on any issue. Check the record. Show me one of your “politicians whose vote is not for sale.___In exchange for all the “work” done for him he allows certain groups to use his signature to cross fundraise.
Posted by: Hegel321 | September 13, 2011, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
HELLO!!! ———- The poor have Medicaid for their medical care…. senior citizens have Medicare… the rich have their own personal wealth… So here we have a fabricated 30 year old who “doesn’t want to spend $300 a month” on health insurance……. yeah…. probably had to buy that flat-screen TV instead… and that is “responsible” HOW???? —– And I love to see the progressives frothing at the mouth and tripping all over themselves with “stereotypes” of conservatives…. really shows intelligence!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 13, 2011, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Ron Paul is a sick old man, spiritually and mentally.
Posted by: Hegel321 | September 13, 2011, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
I can only imagine what the world would be like today if Jesus had felt the same way. How sad that anyone would think it is okay to let someone die who has no medical coverage. A person who has become a Christian WOULD NOT feel this way as that goes against all of the teachings from the bible. Jesus surrounded himself with the poorest and the sickest people – not the wealthy and affluent. I am a long time Democrat and I have advised my grown kids that should I ever decide to become a Republican – that will be their clue that my mind is gone and I need to put in a nursing home. LOL
Posted by: Saints Fan | September 13, 2011, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
The bill does not get written off. That is code for “we double the bill of an insured person, so they end up paying for it”. I don’t think the uninsured man in a coma should die, but I think he should be stuck with his bill for the rest of his life and not be able to declare bankruptcy on it just like a student loan. Why should he get out of his coma for free when I have to pay through the nose for premiums , copays & coinsurance to get out of my coma? If they won’t do that & it’s between me paying for his coma through my insurance or him dying… ummm, RIP.
Posted by: bear | September 13, 2011, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Hegel321 Are you a politician? You still havent answered the question. Typical of both parties. Later, have a conference call.
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
As a non-believer who does carry health insurance – I’m sick of paying for those who don’t carry insurance, and like Ron Paul, I think anyone who does not take personal responsibility should assume the risk that when (and you will) need health care, some church can take care of it instead of my insurance premium.
What’s missing from Paul’s analysis is: NOT EVERYONE GOES TO CHURCH.
Posted by: J | September 13, 2011, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
How sad is our country, now!
Posted by: Justuspofolks | September 13, 2011, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
@gdguynbalt, Not just the churches, The wealthy must pay thier fair share as well forget those tax breaks when we are in a time of need. The Middle-Class and the poor are tired of holding the bag.
Posted by: Lonewolf1044 | September 13, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Yes, take away Congress’s lifetime insurance benefit–they are undeserving. But wow, just let the church take care of it? Seriously?! As a former church trustee (who leans left, BTW) the church does what it can to help people but there is only so much money to go around. I’ve seen congregations come together and help those in need to the extent that they can, but it is also true there are some people who just want to be taken care of by others, and they come time and time again looking for a hand-out. Others suffer a one-time catastrophe and the community does come pouring out–I’m grateful for the latter as a cousin of mine was crushed in the Indiana State Fair accident and I can not say enough good about how people stepped up and first saved her life at the site of the accident, and how the gifts have poured in (insurance doesn’t pay everything). She was in a coma, too. Fortunately with insurance. Tea Baggers would have said pull the plug, disgraceful! BTW, she is on the road to recovery but it will be a long haul.
Posted by: Troy Wood | September 13, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
If you have a few million dollars, then you would have medical insurance. If you don’t have a few million dollars, then you are worthless to the republican party (unless you can at least be brainwashed into voting for them). Might as well let you die. Just be thankful they are not advocating coming after you to finish you off (yet).
Posted by: notrichenough | September 13, 2011, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Lonewolf…. OMG are you saying tax breaks are a form of help? WTH does that mean? Hello rich people, we normally hijack a lot of your money but now we’ll hijack a little less of your money. You’re welcome. You do know that rich people pay a higher percentage of their money in taxes don’t you? A poor person pays 0-10% of their money in taxes. Middle class pays somewhere around 20-30% and rich people pay 50% or more. So them saying, ok we’ll only take 40% now doesn’t really amount to ‘help”.
Posted by: bear | September 13, 2011, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Tea Partyers love killing, even if it’s their fellow Americans.
Posted by: Hegel321 | September 13, 2011, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
How in the hell is a guy in a coma supposed to make decision? Ron Paul and his supporters are idiots!
Posted by: PauletteB | September 13, 2011, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
what we don’t want…. We don’t want uninsured wasting money and time at ERs like they do now. We don’t want to rely on churches and charities which are awesome but not guaranteed and in the end amount to taxing nice people more than not-nice people and it’s not obvious to a sick person without a church to know where to go. I personally prefer to not just let them stay sick or die but I know others feel otherwise. We can’t have perfection, but anything that addresses these issues is welcome.
Posted by: JohnC | September 13, 2011, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
The Tea party does not want to let people die! they just want to get the government out of the middle of the health care. The Tea Party and the community will step up to care for those who need it!!
Posted by: rudy | September 13, 2011, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I wonder how many of those medical support churches get tax payer funding. What is their donation to funding ratio? It was my understanding that the desire to help the elderly and ill came from the teaching of Jesus..the person to whom Christians attribute their morals.
Ron Paul doesn’t need any help from the GOP leaders. He is sinking his own campaign by sending the wrong message….and from a medical doctor, no less. Hypocratic oath voided upon entering politics, i guess.
Posted by: Wayne | September 13, 2011, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Ron Paul is right. How sad that we forget our history so easily. It wasn’t that long ago that many hospitals were a part of and run by the churches. Many of them still have the names, like “Methodist Hospital”, Saint John’s, etc. Back then if you couldn’t afford to pay, the church/hospital would give you treatment as a charity case and you would owe nothing. Now if you don’t have insurance and can’t afford treatment, they give you the bare minimum required by law and send you home to die with a huge stack of bills you can’t pay.
Posted by: sensible99 | September 13, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
And not one of the candidates said anything about that being seriously wrong? I too am sick of people not taking care of themselves and getting insurance, but I certaiinly don’t want to see them left on the side of the road to die. That’s why I didn’t have a problem with Obamacare requiring people to get health insurance so the state or everyone else with insurance getting stuck with the bill. If this crowd is represenative of the Tea Party, I would be ashamed to be associated with them.
Posted by: Catherine | September 13, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Yes, the answer must be to take money away from Joe Sixpack so he can’t afford to help his family out with medical bills.
What a joke. Typical ABC News garbage being shoveled into our heads. I’d certainly rather have Maxine Waters decide whether I live or die than my own family! I’m sure she’d be fair with me.
Posted by: johnnycleveland | September 13, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Ron Paul is so behind the times. A lot has changed since 1960. Hospitals are not run by Christian groups (Sisters of Mercy) they are for profit companies.
Posted by: M | September 13, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
First of all, anyone thinking that there are really people out there who CAN afford medical insurance and do not get it are themselves delusional or trying to sell everyone else a load of B.S. Second, if those cheers were from people who are NOT followers of Ron Paul and were really “plants,” where were the BOOS following those cheering? Where was a denouncement by Paul of those cheers, as McCain did for the idjit that uttered “he’s a Muslim” about President Obama? Just admit it, the GOP has been hijacked by a bunch of soulless, heartless, conscience-less, UN-Americans!
Posted by: MsT-mac | September 13, 2011, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Yes, my emotions overruled my fingers. Before the tp’ers jump all over me, I meant to say, “How in the hell is a guy in a coma supposed to make a decision?”
Posted by: PauletteB | September 13, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Since I haven’t seen the actual clip and I am just using the article as reference I will limit my comments about the tea party. In general they have been too extreme for my tastes. Should we have the right to make choices? absolutely, that’s what democracy is about. But what everyone is not getting here is that medical insurance is not always the viable option you think it is. There is coverage for the very poor, and those with upper range incomes. But there are those of us that fall right in between…we can’t get the medicaid or government coverage, and the private coverage is too expensive to merit having. The average monthly payment for decent coverage is between 400-600/mo with huge deductibles and minimal coverage, depending where you live. Don’t assume we don’t want coverage…maybe we just can’t afford it.
Posted by: disbiz | September 13, 2011, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
I think only the truly indigent should qualify for free healthcare. If you have a widescreen tv, cable service, a laptop, smartphone & internet but no health insurace…. you need to be kicked in the head so you fall into an immediate coma and be allowed to die. You are nothing but a parasite expecting the world to take care of you. We don’t need you here anymore. Somebody worthwhile can take your space. You know who you are. That’s kinda mean to say, but not any more mean than somebody leeching off others to pick up their healthcare tab so they can watch desparate houswives in HD.
Posted by: bear | September 13, 2011, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
If congressman Ron Paul thinks that we should go to church for healthcare, I say that he and the other right-wing looneys in congress should be the FIRST to try it. Give up your tax payer funded healthcare and use the church instead…lets see how that works.
Posted by: Matt | September 13, 2011, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
When I heard that cheering, saw the triumphant smile on Bachmann’s face, thought of Palins past statements, I realized the bloodthirsty mob mentality of the Tea Party is all too real. To think that the candidates running for president are supported by the savage, cold, torch bearing crowd represented by the audience last night is chilling.
Posted by: americangiant | September 13, 2011, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I cannot believe what I just read here. Here I am studying my backside off so I can be a nurse and help everyone, and you have these nutjobs saying that it is ok to let people die who have no health insurance, What???? I just cannot understand how anyone would cheer and want that! These people are pathetic!!! These people are not christians. I don’t even think that they are human to be honest!
Posted by: Tina M Tompkins | September 13, 2011, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Tea Party people are mostly Blue Collar workers. They might be cheering now when someone uninsured person dies but just wait until they lose their jobs and their insurance. The grass always seems greener on the other side of the trailer park.
Posted by: Athiest 1 | September 13, 2011, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Actually, I’d cheer letting the 40% that keep popping up on polls that support Obama “just die”. Wait, that’s probably the majority of fans of the All Barack Channel.
Posted by: Capt D | September 13, 2011, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Those who attend these debates cheer for the death penalty and cheer for those who get sick and are dying; let them die! These people are not Christians; at least any I have ever read about or been around in my lifetime. Pattie Davis; Ronald Reagan’s daughter said on a news interview she would not want to even be in the same room as the wannabe presidents and it sickens her that they compare themselves to her father; I cannot agree more. This is a group of very; very sick people.
Posted by: T Trump | September 13, 2011, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Sounds like the Tea Party is where Palin got her idea about “death panels”.
Posted by: JR | September 13, 2011, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
The Republican party has been hijacked? Woa,… dude. So,… what happened to the Democratic party? They mutated? Perhaps they were stolen by aliens and replaced with time traveling Nazi retreads hoping to come to power by hating the rich? Maybe they think its 1911 instead of 2011 and the whole communist revolution has just begun instead having already been defeated and debunked? Perhaps its the drugs their parents and grandparents did while dodging the draft to avoid Vietnam? Maybe its the brain damage from the rap “music” through 30,000 watt sub-woofers?
Posted by: Capt D | September 13, 2011, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
I sincerely hope that the rest of America is paying very close attention to the utter hatefulness of these people.
Posted by: Spencer | September 13, 2011, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
where exactly are these “churches” going to get the money to pay for all these medical bills? My church is relatively small and right now we are happy because we are not in debt, pay all necessary bills and have an extra $34,000 in the bank…. hardly enough for ONE person. Just like everything else, donations to churches are down so they don’t have a lot of cash to hand out to people. We don’t all go to mega-churches & I am pretty sure my neighbors won’t foot the bill either since many of them are on medicare and fixed income. I think libertarians and tea-baggers need to read up on a time in American History called the GREAT DEPRESSION to learn about why we have social security, medicaid and medicare because if we go with their “plans” we are going to end up right back in one. As an aside, I love how many of these people consider themselves Christians yet want to abolish all programs that help those truly in need. You & I both know that they won’t give enough to charity to cover necessary costs.
Posted by: allie8 | September 13, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
I think Ron Paul was only referring to liberals.
Posted by: billy bob | September 13, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
That is the tea party nuts for you, and here these wierdos were trying to say President Obama wanted to pull the plug of Grandma. The truth is, these so called christians need to read up on a little thing called mercy!, How about this idea, care about our fellow human beings. Yea, the tea party nuts just care about their wallet.
Posted by: MiketheElectrician | September 13, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
This is disgusting, even for the Tea Party. I would say they should be ashamed, but they obviously have no shame.
Posted by: Mike | September 13, 2011, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
It’s sad and sick. They were shouting to let the man die! It’s a hateful menatlity that drives this group. Just like terrorists. Terrorists would also want the country to fall apart until they seize control. Hmm the debt debate
Posted by: TV | September 13, 2011, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Health insurance is unlike any other type of insurance. Health care is something a civilized society cannot deny an individual, but yet that society should not have to bear the cost for those who haven’t secured it. That’s the very reason why I’m very comfortable with universal health care and mandating that individuals carry health insurance or face a penalty.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 13, 2011, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Who cares what Ron paul said and a “few” idiots in the audience did??? ABC is really pathetic on this story.
Posted by: billy bob | September 13, 2011, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
It is a fine mess we’ve gotten ourselves into. I know three families with different circumstances and different ‘coping mechanisms: the first, an illegal family in which the mother cleans houses for a living. She charges $70 an hour and works an average of seven hours, six days a week. She pays no taxes and when the family needs medical care, they go to ER and leave without paying a dime. The second family is in the process of having their fourth child. Neither parent has or wants a job and the birth will be completely covered by a state program. Will not cost them a single cent. Third family has insurance but with a $5,000 deductible.They have arranged for a payment plan with the hospital and doctor for delivery of their baby – it will take them over three years of monthly payments to extinguish the bill. And so, it is the single, responsible, working family who, ultimately, pays for the other, dishonest freeloaders. The President’s health plan, as it stands, will only increase the burden on these ‘responsible’ taxpayers until, eventually, the goose, laying the golden egg, will be cooked.
Over the years, we have extended so many services to the “poor” that many people, poor or not, believe that you are an idiot if you do not take full advantage of the system. Being a welfare recipient has become a career position for a large segment of our population. And it robs them of their self-respect, their ambition, their pride and their honor.
The only solution that I can imagine would be to demand a form of ‘payback;’ not in dollars and cents but something on the order of simply showing-up at a ‘hiring hall’ or community center for, say, three days a week until the bill is paid. Believe me, there are many people who would prefer a real job before they would tolerate that type of obligation.
Posted by: Pepina | September 13, 2011, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
LOL…LOL…You know what? In ten years time we won’t HAVE to be debating this topic….because the educated part of the population, those that are wise enough to be realistic and progressive will have chosen the path of a “national health care plan’. It is inevitable and the ONLY way for costs to be controlled. And the ‘tea partiers’? They will be the small, screaming, fanatical minority that they deserve to be.
Posted by: CND FOX | September 13, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
What a terribly MISLEADING headline!!!!
ABC should be ashamed to feed the left wing nuts such a lie.
j.b.
Posted by: Jack Bates | September 13, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
And tea party guys claim to go to church and follow the teaching of Jesus.
They have no sympathy. They are filled with hate of everyone and everything except themself
Posted by: Mike | September 13, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
I have to admit, I was kinda surprised and taken back at the audience’s response, but it was similar to their response to Brian Williams commen,t about the death sentence in Texas, at the first debate. I also recall remarks from some of my wife’s relatives, republicans, yes, tea party ???. They are early 40′s, both work, have 2 children in grade school. They have no medical ins. themselves, but purchased it for their children. When Obamacare went thru, they were apalled that the gov’t would make them buy medical ins, and stated this will bankrupt us !
Posted by: Malibujim | September 13, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
And just why do they think that insurance came to be? Charity cannot ensure that people are taken care of medically. Everything has a simple solution to a bagger. Goes along with their simple thinking. And I’m going to stop apologizing for calling them “baggers” just because they are insulted by some sexual practice that no one was even aware of. I call them “baggers” — short for Tea Bag Party. They CHOSE the name!
Posted by: MsT-mac | September 13, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Just like the drive by media, i’m sure they interviewed everyone to make sure they were part of the TEA Party.
Posted by: jrock | September 13, 2011, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
So for all the people who buy this twisted article hook line and sinker this is NOT what happened last night. ABC should be ashamed They did not shout or cheer to let this man die. They cheered for gonvernment not stepping in. And for those who think it should, the government should step in in every case where a person is in a coma without health insurance? REALLY??
Ron Paul 2012
Posted by: keredte | September 13, 2011, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Every debate, we get more of a glimpse of the true tea party. What a sick bunch of individuals and these are the people the republicans are trying to seek support from.
Posted by: arriethom1 | September 13, 2011, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
This article is the truth , people. Re-watch the broadcast. It is undefensable. Wolf asked if they should let the man die and audience members shouted , YEAH! Don’t be blind to the truth that the fringe like the TEA Party and they don’t care about anyone but their own.
Posted by: TV | September 13, 2011, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I can’t get over what a sick bunch of people the Republicans have become. It started with racism and has just gone downhill from there. All I can say is that they probobly have pretty good health care. I hope they get a chance to lose it then see what it’s really like.
Posted by: cgarbacki | September 13, 2011, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
searambler said “So if the Republicans are really FOR individual responsibility, how come they are AGAINST the Individual Mandate?” You really don’t understand why? If it is mandated, then you are being forced to do it. You are not free to make your own choice. Individual responsibility means that there are consequences to your actions. If that 30 year old CHOOSES not to purchase insurance, then the consequence when they get sick is that they have to pay out of pocket. If you are a member of a church or some other social group, those people you are close to will help you raise money. I have seen it happen multiple times.
Posted by: wryview | September 13, 2011, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
…”What a terribly MISLEADING headline!!!!”…posted by Jack Bates 4:51 PM….No it absolutely was not misleading. That is EXACTLY what happened last night. Review the tape!
Posted by: Steve | September 13, 2011, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
hopesprings said “Health insurance is unlike any other type of insurance” But it shouldn’t be different. Health insurance should only cover the catastrophic. Can you imagine how expensive car insurance would be if it covered oil changes, tires & batteries?
Posted by: wryview | September 13, 2011, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
The Tea Party and the GOP candidates pandering to them are barbaric. This proves it cheering for allowing someone to die is heartless. So, OK they want to completely do away with Pres. Obama’s Health care law…And what..Let it up to Major insurance companies…We were there and they turned down people who were sick and denied care to current subscribers who got really sick…FREQUENTLY…The current Health care law is changing that. But, Tea Party backers, cheer at letting someone die. WOW…The measure of a great country is how it treats it’s needy..I pray you guys go away
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
I WONDER DID MR. PAUL DECLINE THE TOP HEALTH CARE THAT HE IS ENTITLED TO AS A CONGRESSMAN. THE HEALTH CARE THAT THE MAN HE WOULD LET DIE HAS BEEN PAYING FOR WITH HIS TAXES.
THESE GOP AND TEA PARTY TERRORIST ARE RUINING OUR COUNTRY. THEY FORGET THE MOST IMPORTANT RESOURCE OUR COUNTRY HAS IS IT’S PEOPLE. IF WE DON’T TAKE CARE OF THE PEOPLE WHAT KIND OF COUNTRY WILL WE HAVE.
THIS IS NOT THE AMERICA THE BEAUTIFUL OUR ANCESTORS SPOKEN ABOUT, THE AMERICA WHERE HELPING EACH OTHER WAS A WAY OF LIFE.
THE GOP AND TEA PARTY ARE ACTING LIKE THIRD WORLD DICTATORS, WHO THINK AND ACT LIKE THEY RULE US.
BUT THE SADDEST THING IS THAT THE PEOPLE WHO NEED ‘ REAL ‘ AMERICAN LEADERS CONTINUE TO FOLLOW THESE TERRORIST TO THE SLAUGHTER, SMILING ALL THE WAY. THEY PUT THE GOP IN CHARGE OF THE CONGRESS AND STATE GOVERNMENTS AND NOW THE GOP ARE TAKING AWAY THERE RIGHTS. THE SHEEP ARE BEING SHEERED.
Posted by: george | September 13, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
“Actually, I’d cheer letting the 40% that keep popping up on polls that support Obama “just die”. Wait, that’s probably the majority of fans of the All Barack Channel.” _______________ As much as I dislike the Tea Bagger ideology, I would not wish death on ANYONE. Your statement is why none of the Baggers will ever be President. I believe that you are truly representative of the Bagger movement. Heartless, soulless, and conscious-less terrorists. Yes, Terrorists! Anyone wishing death on Americans because of their beliefs, political party, religion, etc., is a freaking Terrorist, no different than the Taliban!
Posted by: MsT-mac | September 13, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
secondlook said “Mostly the federal and state government” Wrong. Neither the Medicare nor Medicaid cover costs. It is people paying cash and the more generous insurance companies who are pickup up the tab.
Posted by: wryview | September 13, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Where are the moderate republicans. I can’t beleive they put up with this tea party BS. As a democrat I disagrre politically with my republican friends, but they are mostly good hearted , decent people. They are letting a small group of radical right wing extremist take over the party of Lincoln who asked us to listen to the “better angels of our nature”
Posted by: tmferretti | September 13, 2011, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
I would be more impressed with this story if instead of asking “are people willing to let him die?”, Amy Bingham had asked: “How many people are willing to send in a check for $100. for his medical care?”
Posted by: Jim1348 | September 13, 2011, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
The good news is that DOCTOR Paul and his son, another DOCTOR, left medicine!! So, TeaBaggers, you want ‘personal responsibility’. So, again, answer Wolf Blitzer’s question which doesnt change even if you believe in ‘personal responsibility’. Previously healthy uninsured 30 year old gets in car accident, shows up in ER. Who among you lets him or her die without care because they dont have insurance? Doctors take an oath to care for this person. The Law inisists we take care of this person. AND the Bible insists we care for this person. Now what???
Posted by: Marc | September 13, 2011, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
The question asked was about a hypothetical 30 year old man who could afford insurance, but just didn’t want to buy it. Kind of a key detail this article left out.
Posted by: Will | September 13, 2011, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
secondlook said “Mostly the federal and state government” Wrong. Neither the Medicare nor Medicaid cover costs. It is people paying cash and the more generous insurance companies who are pickup up the tab.
Posted by: wryview | September 13, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm ……………………………….. “A 2003 study in Health Affairs estimated that uninsured people in the U.S. received approximately $35 billion in uncompensated care in 2001. The study noted that this amount per capita was half what the average insured person received. The study found that various levels of government finance most uncompensated care, spending about $30.6 billion on payments and programs to serve the uninsured and covering as much as 80–85% of uncompensated care costs through grants and other direct payments, tax appropriations, and Medicare and Medicaid payment add-ons. Most of this money comes from the federal government, followed by state and local tax appropriations for hospitals.” …………………………. Generous insurance companies? You have GOT to be kidding me.
Posted by: Secondlook | September 13, 2011, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
this article is as misleading as Obamma speaches.
Posted by: Rocco | September 13, 2011, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
ABC: How is it that someone who has the hubris to call himself “REAL AMERICAN” gets so many posts? I guess his posting name means that he thinks anyone who disagrees with him is not a “REAL AMERICAN”. Whoever he is, he must be an atheist, because no religion that I am aware of, teaches the kind of lesson that he espouses. What a sad, bitter individual. What a terrible upbringing and life he must have led to be filled with so much hate, and no compassion. It won’t matter what happens to him when he dies, because he’s already condemned himself to live in Hell while on this earth. I only hope that he has no children, whom he would fill with the same vitriolic hate. But ABC, why did you give this guy so much space? He spewed the exact same hatred over and over again. Whoever vetts this message board for ABC ought to be reassigned or fired.
Posted by: Steve Hamilton | September 13, 2011, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
I have to say, as an anti-tea type person, I kind of like Ron Pauls “out-of-the-box” thinking. It won’t get him elected, but one can applaud the fact he’s searching for alternatives… unlike the rest of these clowns. WHERE is the middle ground where liberals and conservatives can come together and actually SOLVE a freaking issue??? The answer is, nowhere. The system is broken, and the rebel patriots that signed the Declaration in 1776 would be absolutely rolling in their graves if they knew the silly playground games our wonderful two party system is playing. Jefferson was against a two party system… wonder why??
Posted by: Troy | September 13, 2011, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
That decision should be made by an Obamacare death panel.
Posted by: SpecialKinNJ | September 13, 2011, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
My Father is 62 and had worked hard all his life. He had insurance with the Companies he has worked for. Now that he is ill, the “Company” let him go. Now he has no insurance. He needs a pacemaker and some additional surgeries. BUT, he can’t find work. No one will hire him because of his condition. He does not qualify for Disability or Retirement. So basically, yeah! They would rather my Father die than help him.
Posted by: Noah | September 13, 2011, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
ABC didn’t make the story, the debate and Tea-Party audience did. So the Tea-Baggers would rather see the poor and sick of this country die off, WHAT’S NEW ABOUT THAT ??
Posted by: MaryLou | September 13, 2011, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
*
this article purposely switched around the order of the applause and debate comments.
liars
Posted by: jwb3 | September 13, 2011, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
The family values/anti-abortion party. Once you’re out of the womb though
you are on your own.
Posted by: Jenny | September 13, 2011, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
JUMPINGMONKEY: “Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose”
Posted by: Secondlook | September 13, 2011, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
The fact that ABC would broadcast a “Article” this biased and so poorly interptreted leads me to believe that the Liberal Democrat bias is alive and well at your network. Ron Paul is a Libertarian and has the right to run for President as he often does. I live in Texas and I guarantee he does not represent my congressional district. I watched the entire debate and quite frankly wonder if your writer did. As Ron said, nobody ever gets turned away. All hospitals treat indigents for free and write off the costs, which is why you are charged $8.00 for aspirin. Someone working for the Obama Administration must have written this article because it is wishful thinking.
Posted by: ROYSTOLL2 | September 13, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Hospitals do not remotely write off costs. It amazes me that so many of you are completely unaware that your federal, state and local tax dollars pay for this care.
Posted by: Secondlook | September 13, 2011, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Well, doesn’t that beat all?!? Leave it to Ron Paul and the Christian tea party to advocate death over medicine. Some of the people in this country who are hiding behind religion and advocating death over medicine is something only a Satanist would say. Truly we need to eradicate this blemish on our society and that of humanity. These people are as equally tyrannical as are the Taliban and the Al Qaeda: And, perhaps far more dangerous to all of mankind.
Posted by: Joe | September 13, 2011, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Thx, you GOP whack jobs, re-election is a gimmee. 2012 is looking so good for us DEMS, we should pay you guys. 3 to 1 odds in Vegas, easy money. GOP got more nerve than a one-legged man in a butt kicking contest. Go DEMS in 2012′.
Posted by: Jeffrey Freeman | September 13, 2011, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
@SecondLook and CND FOX re: Irregardless. I even found it Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (copyright 1985), “Blend of irrespective and regardless.” Baggers are too funny. They don’t even use simple research like a freaking dictionary and then get on these blogs and display their ignorance. Same tactic they use to spread their lies and ignorant ideology. No basis whatsoever for their beliefs other than hatred of anyone not like them.
Posted by: MsT-mac | September 13, 2011, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
“According to Ron Paul and his Tea Party type of thinking, it’s Every Man For Himself.” No community responsibility. Well, why don’t we take this approach with the military. The next time the Rich want to invade some oil fields, send the sons and daughters of Wall Street’s CEOs, and U.S. Congressmen. The next time terrorist strike, call only the rich to serve in the military since they are the only ones deserving Government Support, or Corporate Welfare. They are the only ones the Tea Party/Republican Party feel is worthy of Legislation to promote and protect their interest.
Do not send poor and middle class firefighters and policemen to your next Ground Zero, then refuse them proper Health Care. You and the Rich Go and show the rest of us how it’s done.
By the way if you want to ignore the poor. Stop taxing them at a higher rate than you tax the Rich. Stop spilling their Blood on your battlefields, and most of all Stop using them as scapegoats for all of your economic and social failures.
To the Rich Tea Party members, government doesn’t exist to cater only to You. To the Poor Tea Party members, You are not Poor because of poor people of Color blocking you out of the American Dream, Try working harder and Legislating the Rich off all of our backs.
Posted by: Whitaker | September 13, 2011, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
What do all of you brainless people think happens with uninsured people NOW? Think no critically ill person has never needed medical care before last night’s debate?Any hospital that receives any federal funds at all, are required….and have been since 1986….to not turn ANYONE away that needs medical care.
The doddering old fool Paul doesn’t represent ANY of the other Republicans.
Paul is a Libertarian…not a Republican….the applause he receives is from the tiny fringe that think Gvt shouldn’t do anything for anyone…including defending our safety.
ONCE AGAIN….WHAT DO YOU THINK HAS BEEN HAPPENING WITH UNINSURED PEOPLE NEEDING MEDICAL CARE NOW? THEY GET TREATMENT! AT EVERY HOSPITAL. that is not a privately owned hospital….which there might be a dozen at most of them…very small, very limited beds.
Use your brains people…..sick people aren’t new
Posted by: Joel G Greer | September 13, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Everyone of you saying the cheering was for taking personal responsibility is full of bull. If that were true you guys would not be caring on about the provision in the health care bill requiring everyone to carry health insurance. Give me a break
Posted by: anamericanpatriot | September 13, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Hello America, whats the difference between letting the uninsured die from no coverage, or letting the insured holders die from the lack of being able to pay the High Deductibles do to Obamacare? one way or the other no one will be covered, at least in the old system someone was covered. namely me. sincerely Fezzy Bear
Posted by: Fezzy Bear | September 13, 2011, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I find it so interesting that during the healthcare discussion prior to it PASSING, that the republicans discussed the use of death panels to scare the elderly and uninsured. Now it is the Tea Party, the self anointed leaders of the republican party, they are the ones proposing that we let people die if they are without insurance.
It is the republican who we are to fear because they will do whatever want to forward their own cause and the cause of big business. Where are their programs? What specifics do they intend to put in place to improve our economy, other than repealing healthcare??
Let’s face it, repealing healthcare is all about protecting the insurance industry.
Posted by: AJ | September 13, 2011, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Perry is a puppet for Merck.
Posted by: Junglej24 | September 13, 2011, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Probably the best solution would be to harvest the usable organs of ill people without health insurance and then publicly put them out of their misery. The event could be pay per view. The cost effectiveness of this would be a real savings.
Posted by: Jane | September 13, 2011, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Oh yes, all the health care discussion and the congress still has healthcare until they die. While the american people have to fight tooth and nail to get healthcare benefits at a reasonable price.
Who says that Obamacare comes with high deductibles? That is only the insurance companies trying to maintain their profit margins under the change of healthcare for all/
What is wrong with every citizen being entitled to heathcare?? If the government supports heath care for congress, why not support the American people??
Posted by: AJ | September 13, 2011, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I think it was a liberal nut-job plant heckling. Can anyone prove differently?
Posted by: jrock | September 13, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
What is really scarey is the number of people that don’t understand how govt. works and continue to confuse or compare govt. to private industry. Govt. does not have a single goal of profit like the private sector; it must serve many goals that often compete. The Postal Service cannnot cherry pick to whom it delivers mail or charge an exorbant fee for such (unlike Fedex and UPS). Medicare is not a miserable failure if service is the criterion by which it is judged. If you expect it to make a profit then it is failure. Ask yourself if you are really happy with your private insurance company. Is it easy to be reimbursed for a procedure or to even get one approved ahead of time? My experience is that private insurance is a major pain to deal with and my primary care doctor agrees. And do you know why? It is in the interest of the company to frustrate insurees making claims or to dispute them because it is better for their bottom line to not pay than to pay. And all the talk during the health care debate last year about the evils of rationing in a govt. run system. That’s exactly what private insurance companies do every day. Ask yourself why should there be a profit motive in health insurance at all? Why should execs make those large salaries? It couldn’t be because they have held costs down.
Posted by: wenplan | September 13, 2011, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
The church hospitals that people use today have the same incentives to spread the revenue across the paying patients that the other not for profit and for profit facilities use. Yes you can send a child to St Judes and they receive world class care, but it is not free. It is free to those who truely can not afford it. To those with insurance the insurance is billed.
Posted by: Storck78 | September 13, 2011, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
More “it’s all about me, me, me” from the self-centered, hypocritical Tea Party members
Posted by: Thomas | September 13, 2011, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
As for churches covering the costs like they used to, most of you do not know what used to was. A catholic Church had many nurses who were nuns working at below livable wages because they stayed in facilities that were rent free, and had communal living arrangements with vows of poverty and chastity. The medical treatments were daily pill runs of marginally effective medicines and the Dr prescribed bed rest, not coronary bypass, heart valve replacement, surgical stents, metal reconstruction of damaged limbs. The charities like churches can not begin to afford the technologies used as standards of care these days. Ron Paul’s liritarian view on keep the government out of all decisions may sound good to many, but to anyone out there who is underemployed or competing against an overseas manufacturing base, it will not work period.
Posted by: Storck78 | September 13, 2011, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
“I think it was a liberal nut-job plant heckling. Can anyone prove differently?” __________ Can you prove it WAS a liberal nut-job plant? Ask yourself why didn’t Paul say anything to chastise the hecklerS? Why didn’t some in the audience boo at the people cheering? Why didn’t Ron Paul state that he was NOT saying we should let people die. Stating the fact that no hospital can turn people away is not the same as saying he approves of the practice.
Posted by: MsT-mac | September 13, 2011, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
So all you bashing the christians you would step in and pay this guys hospital bill to prevent him from dieing. Yea, right.
Posted by: justcurioux | September 13, 2011, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Just because somebody yells the sheep on here think it was somebody that was part of the party.
Posted by: justcurioux | September 13, 2011, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
almost guaranteed this was staged
Posted by: notblind | September 13, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
First off, the title of the article is so misleading it’s offensive. The fact that they were cheering is because it’s not the governments job to tell us who to give our hard earned money to. They were NOT cheering because someone is dying. I wonder when the Dems will finally pick up on our “hints”?? I have no problem helping people in need and I give to charities. However, I don’t appreciate the gov’t telling me that I HAVE to pay for someone else’s insurance when I can barely afford to take care of my own family due to their careless spending and wasteful programs.
Posted by: Candace | September 13, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
It’s about time we thinned the herd………..of democrats.
Posted by: Allen | September 13, 2011, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
As an independent voter, I wouldn’t vote for any of the Republican clowns. I am sick of the Tea Party people holding America Hostage. It’s their way or the highway and they have the nerve to say that about the President. Too funny for words.
Posted by: Carol | September 13, 2011, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
we should let sick people die it’s their fault for not praying to God enough.
Posted by: praisegod | September 13, 2011, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Come on ABC, you know what the point was right? This is a misleading headline!
Posted by: mrmitch | September 13, 2011, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
And then I read about the 12 people who risked their lives to lift a car with a motorcyclist trapped beneath it, all while the motorcycle is on fire and the car is smoking, seemingly ready to explode. Humanity does exist, just not in the Tea Party – or any self admitted Republican.
Posted by: GetRealPeoples! | September 13, 2011, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
PRO-LIFE = no health insurance so your child dies anyway. Hypocracy at it’s worst!
Posted by: GetRealPeoples! | September 13, 2011, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
those few(?) cheering spectators for allowing a person needing medical help to just DIE put a whole new definition on the “ugly American”. And I thought this society was spiraling up some 60+ years after that book was written. WRONG.. we have an albatross around our necks called the Tea Partiers.
Posted by: Grace | September 13, 2011, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Most of the Tea Party people I know have some form of Government Health Insurance. I had one lady go on and on about how terrible the Obama healt care paln is and how the government has no business in the health care field. Her husband who was in the hospital bed nest to my husband was covered by the Vererans Health Care plan and they had no deductibles. Their health care was paid for 100% by the Government.
Now, I don’t begrudge our Veteran their health care benefits. Bur, REALLY?
Posted by: Carol | September 13, 2011, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
hello fezzy. it does not impose a fine you just will not get a tax break for caring health insurance and most people that can’t afford it probably don’t pay taxes to need the deductions. read the bill before critizing it
Posted by: anamericanpatriot | September 13, 2011, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
This Republican is totally disgusted with “ideas” like those spouted and cheered by a bunch of ignorant Neanderthals, the worst of whom is Bachmann, who just loves spreading lies and half-truths to obscure reality with her bizarre hallucinations. That this woman got elected to Congress by the good people of Minnesota leaves me speechless.
Posted by: NPMike | September 13, 2011, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
You have to put a cap on services with Obamacare. Many people free load for attention, food, diability, etc in the ER, etc. I see it all the time. There are plenty of jobs Americans can work– if you take them off disability for any mental disorder except schizophrenia and MR. First savings by the billion.
Then put a cap on therapy, I mean seriously, therapy for more than 2 years? Are you serious? What the hell else can you possibly learn, therapists are not your “friends” to talk to at tax payer expense.
The tea party has a point, but caps on services that are not life threatening would save money. Also, how about all type ii diabetics and anyone obese pay for thier own meds for being fat?
I get the self responsibility, there is a point, but cancer? C’mon, you have to treat someone with cancer, broken leg, cuts, rape, accidents. There is a middle ground people- lets stand together on it.
Posted by: social worker | September 13, 2011, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Liberals, pay attention- learn about anti socials, borderlines, narcissists, drug addicts. These people do what they want and fully expect tax payers to “help” them. They get section 8 FOREVER and thier kids inherit the section 8-seriously.
Conservatives, crime has been cut in half from 1974 when abotion became legal. Have contreception in high schools and abortion goes down. Teen agers are stupid- end of story- try to help them not get pregnant while stupid. I do not want to take any womens rights away as all countries without them are sh** holes and i dont wont more crime in 15 years after its illegal.
Problem solve people- and learn about what humans motives are and give some consiquences but try not to be so harsh about it.
I had a women the other day who had medicare, wants medication, is anti social with five children she neve cared for as she was in jail on and off for 25 years. She did get her section 9 and welfare and PT custody. Seriously- meds can’t help her, nothing can, why the section 8?
Judge people on thier behaviors. She costs us millions in DCFS, section 8, medicare, jail, therapy, meds, birthing, welfare, food stamps-personality disorders cost us all billions.
Posted by: social worker | September 13, 2011, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
social worker | September 13, 2011, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
___________________________________
So you’re comparing an ex convict, welfare mom on section 8 with a person that is dying of cancer??
Did you ever take a debate class in your entire life????
Posted by: Mrs. K | September 13, 2011, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
churches could never foot the bill for the uninsured. and if in some fantasy world they could right now, the number of uninsured is growing and can only be remedied by a change in the health care system. a change that is happening now under the current presidency. i’m not ready to group all tea party supporters with all republicans. i’m hoping only tea party is this against health care reform since it is integral to the welfare of this country.
Posted by: knievel m.d. | September 13, 2011, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
I second Robota’s comment, “Ron Paul won. He might have got booed by the war mongers, Most of whom have never fought in a war. But i have to support the consistent one. Who knows what the rest of them will be saying next week, Let alone next year.”
Posted by: Onerioi | September 13, 2011, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I would cheer for the death of a few media outlets that distort the facts to suit their own purposes. They were cheering personal responsibility, shame on you ABC news, and all your cohorts in the media that have forgotten how to report facts truthfully and honestly.
Posted by: Heather | September 13, 2011, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
This has won the shoddy news award of the day. Anyone who watched the debate fully understands that there were a few who cheered and quickly shut up. The headline implies the whole crowd cheered.
Posted by: DAVID | September 13, 2011, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
So, does Doctor Paul really believe the only way a person ends up in a coma is as a result of personal choices they made or by acting irresponsibly? Does he think that it really is a choice whether or not to purchase health insurance for everybody in this country, that there aren’t plenty of people who are deprived of the opportunity to purchase, even if they want to and think it is the “responsible thing to do” by either lack of sufficient funds or pre-existing conditions that price the insurance out of their reach? He can acknowledge that the hospital he used to work at never turned anybody away for lack of ability to pay for their healthcare, yet he’d have the government advocate that very thing, thus missing the important moral imperative his hospital was an exemplar of.
Posted by: Mike | September 13, 2011, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
I am so sick of people saying “government run healthcare” would be a disaster. Obamacare is not a government run health plan, and as far as government run healthcare? My husband is a disabled veteran who gets his care from a GOVERNMENT run VA HOSPITAL, and I can tell you he gets excellent care. He is now a 3 year cancer survivor, who got his chemo and radiation and his medicine at no cost to him, and they treated him with the utmost respect, care, and support. My son is also a cancer survivor at the ripe old age of 21, and he has Medicare/Medicaid, government run, right? He received excellent care from his oncologist and is not 2 years cancer free. Government run does not equate poor quality, ask any veteran. They will agree.
Posted by: jdona | September 13, 2011, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
I don’t know why Buffett, Gates, Soros, et al, all the multi-billionaires who support Obama and his ilk don’t donate all their billions–keeping one billion each for themselves (seems like enough)—and form a foundation to care for the uninsured. Think of the good they could do and still live like kings. Then, they wouldn’t have to feel guilty and stomp for Obama’s tax the rich people agenda. They could organize panels to decide what would be covered and what would not. They could help their nation and help their fellow man. A big win all around. Too simple???
Posted by: pam | September 13, 2011, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Reading these Right Winger Comments about how it’s ‘personal responsibility’, let me elighten you: Facts are if you get sick, and you HAVE healthcare and you PAY For it, there is a extremely high chance you will be dropped and DENIED..you will not be ALLOWED to purchase health insurance. I am in that boat, as well as MANY people I know..herein lies the problem..what do you do in this country if you want healthcare and can’t get it? And you people can defend this position all you want, but I live in a red state..and have heard many times that poor people should die from these Republicans (of course, they aren’t smart enough to figure out that includes themselves). A change in our system, will allow people access to care, and take the burden off of companies…but GOP will never go for it, it’s their cash cow…military, oil, pharma, and medicine..these are the things strangling this country. Until they are dealt with, America will never again prosper.
Posted by: A | September 13, 2011, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Churches?? Really??? What a completely disingenuous statement to say that churches could even handle that kind of financial responsibility! All non-profits are stretched to the limit right now *without* caring for the uninsured.
Also disingenuous to simplify the argument down to “people should take responsibility for themselves”. There are OFTEN circumstances and situations beyond people’s control that can leave them without health insurance.
Is this the kind of country we want to become, a country that doesn’t take care of it’s own? I want to know how many of those people “cheering” in the audience donate enough to their church to actually make this a feasible argument – otherwise, they are COMPLETE HYPOCRITES.
Posted by: heart | September 13, 2011, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
I know some self-proclaimed tea partiers. To a person they are sucking off of some kind of government program — medicare, disabilty, veteran’s benefits, government pensions, you name it. Yet they rage at the very government that feeds them. Some kind of weird self hatred. They trumpet “personal responsiblity,” yet exercise none of it themselves. If one of these tea freaks ever did get elected and cut off all of the government goodies, these people would go nuts.
Posted by: E | September 13, 2011, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
ron paul- the new Dr.Death Kivorkian
libertarians- the pirates of the atlantic-pacific out to steal our heritage, given to us with the blood of our founding fathers, veterans of all our foreign wars, the victory of the Constitution and Bill of Rights over the slavery,bigotry,racism and murders of the Confederacy and the Klan, the defeat of fascism and nazism and communism by leaders like Truman,JFK and FDR.
the libertarians are the masked men of the dark forest, where lives the demons that haunt the outsiders of our society who are incapable of having feelings that connect them to humanity.
they only exist as hollow and empty creatures who live for themselves and cheer the deaths of anyone they judge unworthy of being alive in the world they inhabit and seek to dominate,control and own. damn them all.
Posted by: smokinsady | September 13, 2011, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
That was not the Tea Party. That was the Republican establishment pretending to be the Tea Party. Be very very wary of any group claiming to be the Tea Party. The Tea party is me an you not people CNN. HA! HA! Nice try! Of Course the pretend Tea Party (republican establishment will take a shot at Ron Paul because they fear the hell out him. Then they will pretend to boo him They stand for (Republican Establishment )foreign wars forever.
Posted by: Derek | September 13, 2011, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Do not confuse the tea party with Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul is a nut and I’m sure that those idiots that are being used to paint the tea party in a bad light, are his supporters. It is libel for this reporter to make the statements that he has made. You should all be ashamed to jumpt at a chance to use a couple of idiots to slander an entire group of people. I think that is called being bigoted. I’m a member of the tea party and a christian and I don’t know anyone that believes that anyone should be allowed to “just die”. Life is a precious gift from God. I guess some of you have no problem wiping out that gift while it is unprotected in the womb but cry foul when you attitude is voiced by some other nuts in the way it was. You are either very willfully ignorant of what the tea party stands for or you are just stupid – you can’t fix stupid.
Posted by: Amy | September 13, 2011, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Ron Paul is a doctor, and he said of a man in a coma “What he should do is whatever he wants to do and assume responsibility for himself” ; I am no doctor, but if a man is in a coma, he can not assume responsibility for his decisions, or do “whatever he wants”, he’s in a coma; I hope I never find myself in a coma, under Dr. Paul’s “care”.
Posted by: nyreviewer | September 13, 2011, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
I for the life of me do not understand how a republican (or teabagger, pick you poison) can sit here and say the solution to health care is NO health care. Or trust the health insurance companies, because really, REALLY they have your best interests at heart. HA
The USA is in the embarrasing position of being behind many other countries in how we resolve the health care dilemna. Our politicians have no ideas because the lobbiests pay them to not think at all…
It is either socialized medicine or NONE at all, because the republican party has no thoughts on the matter.
Posted by: della | September 13, 2011, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
The solution is that you get what you pay for, once we do that we figure out the true cost of healthcare, then we can worry about figuring out what we can pay for as societal charity. I believe we can cover Primary Care and Accidents, we cannot cover chronic disease or medicine. When someone has cancer they are dying, when someone has Diabetes they are dying. Providing for the General Wellfare does not include staving off natural death. Sure the republicans have a plan, their plan is to get the healthcare you can afford, for some that will be the latest and greatest treatment for others it will be ibuprofen and a smile. We as a society, and no society in fact can guarantee anything paid for by money, that include needs and wants, in trying to guarantee those things we just hasten the inevitable fall that will be caused by famine, disease, or war, caused by the overpopulation.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 13, 2011, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Nothing conservatives say is shocking to me anymore. I live in the south and hear stuff like that ALL THE TIME. Then they talk about how God is the answer and will punish the liberals. It makes the movie “Idiocracy” seem like a portentous horror movie instead of a comedy.
Posted by: George | September 13, 2011, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
The USA is in the embarrasing position of being behind many other countries in how we resolve the health care dilemna
I don’t buy that statement and if you’ll look I am sure you will realize that we have excellent care. The argument last night was not to have insurance or coverage but how best to get it. This President has already raided medicare for 500 billion to fund his agenda. The Ron Paul question was one of fiction in that the question was framed as the guy had the money to buy a policy-he didn’t, he got sick and went into a coma. What Ron Paul should have said was yes he’ll get treatment and then if and when he is able we will send him the bill for being a man of means who decided to be a jerk and not buy insurance.
Romney said it best wen he said health care is expensive because it is free to most of us.
Posted by: DAVID | September 13, 2011, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Let’s hear it from the “fry em and let em die crowd”. The best of America. NOT!!!!
Posted by: CESF | September 13, 2011, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
People don’t buy insurance because they know that they will be taken care of at the emergency room if it’s the law. Why waste money on insurance, apparently, is how they think. Maybe we should start turning away anyone without a life-threatening issue. Maybe then they won’t milk it. Seems like a better scenario to me instead of requiring everyone to have insurance. I know a couple that owns their own business. They pay $24,000 a year for health insurance for a family of 5. They are ready to drop it, and get some sort of cheap “emergency-only” insurance (I don’t keep track of this stuff.) I guess my point is that self-employed people would actually save money by paying for services when they occur. Assuming they don’t get something like cancer.
Posted by: BK.70 | September 13, 2011, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
WOW – shame on ABC for some extreme yellow journalism. The article title is horrendously misleading. The audience cheered a man in a coma having the right to die by choice. Does anyone read these articles before writing the titles?
Posted by: Doctor2B | September 13, 2011, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
The poor have medicad. It is the middle class that don’t have the money for health insurance so I guess Ron Paul wants to kill off them. Please Republicans find someone who is not a tea bagger and has realistic ideas about how to make our country work. Does anyone understand the word “moderate”?
Posted by: barbara | September 13, 2011, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Conservative pinheads…no need to say anything else.
Posted by: mrgmorgan56 | September 13, 2011, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Wow, this is REALLY bad reporting; REPORT the news, don’t make it up!
Posted by: Aaron Ververs | September 13, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
This batch o’dates is a goober brigade.
Posted by: sameagain | September 13, 2011, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
If churches and charities could foot the bill, we would not be having the discussion. The Republican-tea party would simply point to all the uninsured people’s hospital bills that are being paid. Stop repeating the talking points and deal with the reality that poverty is real and spreading. And these simpletons on the right keep trying to find ways to justify companies not providing insurance in the name of creating jobs.
Posted by: focusonjobs1 | September 13, 2011, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
This kind of mindset should not be surprising. Hatred has become the norm in our culture.
Posted by: LMR | September 13, 2011, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Sad fact of what has been allowed to happen in the USA, turn brother against brother, profit is everything.
Posted by: OurPlanet | September 13, 2011, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
I hope who ever cheered has a family member with no insurance go through a horrible illness and let them died due to no insurance! Ron Paul is that your Hippocratic oath? Do harm to those who have no insurance? Ron Paul has been in politic for many years and he gets his health insurance and all his entitlements paid for. Thats why Congress is so corrupt! THE AMERICAN PEOPLE PAY for them and a lot of Working American people get nothing! I am ashamed of Congress and their needs. They say what they think we want to hear and then get voted in and only care about themselves and their entitlements. Then they might do one good thing and then they work the rest of the time trying to get re elected! Need to cut Congress and we will never see that because Government is greedy.
Posted by: Heather | September 13, 2011, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Let’s see…
1. Many in the Tea Party cheers for Ron Paul when he advocates personal choice and responsibility.
2. Amy Bingham cynically and dishonestly reports it as them cheering for the death of the uninsured.
3. And the sheep start bleating… “What terrible people Christians are!”
The left LOVES to hate those with whom they disagree. Depressingly predictable.
Posted by: Reasonabledude33 | September 13, 2011, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
ABC is owned and operated by the same shills that bring you wars for corporate gain. The cheers were for PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. Stop looking for handouts!
Posted by: Fox Mulder | September 14, 2011, 7:00 am 7:00 am
The question was what if a healthy 30 year old decides not to purchase health insurance then gets cancer should society pay to take care of him. or What if a 30 year old decides not to have car insurance and gets drunk and runs into a school play ground and puts 20 children in the hospital with serious injuries should he pay for the consequences and be prosecuted.
It’s obvious to me that many of you were raised without a sense of responsibility and cannot relate to many of us who started working at 17 went to school nights for years, got degrees worked 60 plus hours a week plus weekends to support our families paid for insurance from our sweat and or used our savings when necessary to do so and never asked society for a dime even in the hardest times and we’ve had them.
You are self praising fools who if you have your way relitive to stealing from people like me to support bad choices or goverment goverment fostered dependency will kill the goose that laid the golden egg. I as many others can see that big goverment is totally incapable of real and quantative judgement with compassion. Giving at a local level with an understanding of real need is what I can support. Not the stupid goverment distribution of my hard earned success.
Posted by: Flashprism | September 14, 2011, 7:17 am 7:17 am
Churches cannot help with people in need. They are too busy spending all of their money on building new buildings for their congregations.
Posted by: sidney | September 14, 2011, 7:32 am 7:32 am
Let me see…. They’re against abortion, euthanasia, shutting off life support machines even after years and yet they cheer about letting uninsured people die, refusing the help or provide insurance for them in the first place (also food, heat during the cold and a roof over their heads) and then top the whole thing with telling us what wonderful christians they are? …yeah. right.
Posted by: whatever | September 14, 2011, 7:40 am 7:40 am
I am not a ‘Tea bagger, nor am i a proponent of Ron Paul’s…however, I strongly agree with this viewpoint!! As a person in the US with AIDS and Insurance, I know first-hand about cost. Just one prescription for my treatment is $4000 per month!! I take 7 pills each and every morning and 4 more in the evening!! ,without my insurance I would most certainly be in a very bad way!! I am unable to work, and dealing with a very long recovery period!! The doctor appointments are endless, I am currently up to 4 doctors with more being added on an almost weekly basis!! Without family by my side and insurance footing the majority of my bills…what am i to do?? I am in danger of losing my insurance…since I cannot work my average weekly hours is falling. Once the average falls below a certain level (set by my employer and the insurance company) my insurance will cease!! What is a person to do then?? My illness is not going to go away on its own!! Medical costs are sky high and without income I cannot pay for them!! There are programs in my state for which I have applied, and in due time expect to be approved…however, that waiting period can be long…who covers the in-between?? Me?? How?? Government?? Yea, right!! That is who I am waiting on approval from…get sick in America and you become a dollar sign!! I think going to the churches is a viable, and reasonable solution…it is a start!! We have to start somewhere people…the debate in Washington is simply ridiculous…I, for one, and quite uneasy about what they can accomplish anymore!! They do nothing but wrangle with each other’s party…its not about what the people want anymore…its about big business, politics, religion, and who has the money!! Poor people in this country are the true teabaggers…I hate the fact that this group of right-wing idiots took the name first…what we need is a real tea party raid, just like the original in Boston so many years ago!! Dont agree with a new tax?? Do something about it…WE have to be the ones to let THEM know we are done with the BS!!! Votes just dont do it anymore!!! Obama is doing the best he can with what he was dealt…we are so quick to forget the shape the country was in after the Bush years!! He inherited a friggin mess!!! And with the current infighting in Congress…the man dont stand a chance!!! They will continue to dog him the same way they did Bill Clinton!!! My question is what if Hillary had won instead?? I believe things would be a great deal different!! This country can handle a woman President, I think we are ready!!
Posted by: AIDSPatientinIN | September 14, 2011, 7:42 am 7:42 am
Now you know who the Republicans really are. Ron Paul made his money on insurance companies, took kickbacks from those same insurance companies. He came to Texas to practice because Texas is in bed with the doctors and insurance companies. Doctors literally have to be caught with the smoking gun in hand to be sued, then it is iffy. Republicans don’t give a tinker’s damn about anyone except the rich. The rest of us can just die and it would be “oh well, we cleaned out the rifraff.” As long as Americans keep pandering to politicians, we will be in this mess. Insurance companies, doctors and hospitals face no regulation, no oversight. They are the new faces of organised crime in this country.
Posted by: Carolyn | September 14, 2011, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Once again, misleading headline by abc. It’s one big payoff to insurance companies, making sure every person has health care ins. The first poster makes sense. My adult kid went to the ER (no health ins/in college) for thrush and got billed over $700. The costs are out of control. Insurance reform and flat rates would have been the first step, IMO, to getting healthcare straight.
Posted by: wildblueyondergoAF | September 14, 2011, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Just perused the first 10+ comments and it’s abundantly clear how people will take the spin and run with it, just for the sake of knocking a group they need to despise. This article takes the event out of context purposely to lead people to hate the Tea Party. I thought hate was only for conservatives. What a shock!
Posted by: wildblueyondergoAF | September 14, 2011, 8:04 am 8:04 am
Churches founded most health care centers.
Hospitals were for the most part, were created and run by religious organizations early on, based on charity. Saint Mary’s, Mercy, Saint Francis Hospital, Presbyterian, Jewish etc.
They were tax exempt. And a great contributors to the general welfare of the citizens.
Universities, drug companies, insurance corps, took over, got their tentacles in there, and enjoy the benefits preying on the sick. Now we have medical centers and HMO’s run for profit.
And most pay zero taxes. Insurance is the scam. Get back to a stable currency; there will be no need for them.
Posted by: Tom | September 14, 2011, 8:05 am 8:05 am
I can’t believe that headline is still up. That is NOT what happened. Whatever happened to journalistic integrity?
Posted by: wryview | September 14, 2011, 8:08 am 8:08 am
Sidney said “Churches cannot help with people in need. They are too busy spending all of their money on building new buildings for their congregations.” That is one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever seen for stereotyping.
Posted by: wryview | September 14, 2011, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Mike said “So, does Doctor Paul really believe the only way a person ends up in a coma is as a result of personal choices they made or by acting irresponsibly?” No. He believes that the personal choice that individual made was to not purchase insurance.
Posted by: wryview | September 14, 2011, 8:12 am 8:12 am
The hypothetical case was an “uninsured 30-year-old working man in coma” who, in Ron Paul’s opinion, should “whatever he wants to do and assume responsibility for himself.” A comatose patient is not in a position to “want to do” anything.
Posted by: Julianna's Uncle | September 14, 2011, 8:47 am 8:47 am
‘Yup. History repeats. Dark ages coming back.
Posted by: coati2 | September 14, 2011, 8:47 am 8:47 am
This solidifies my stance to never vote for a republican for President. These tea people care nothing for this country their only objective is to replace Obama and they could careless what crazy loon they vote in to take his position.
Posted by: achillies | September 14, 2011, 8:50 am 8:50 am
““What he should do is whatever he wants to do and assume responsibility for himself,” Paul responded, adding, “That’s what freedom is all about, taking your own risk. This whole idea that you have to compare and take care of everybody…” The audience erupted into cheers, cutting off the Congressman’s sentence.” +++++ How sad for America that so many think this way! “Freedom” includes fire departments, police departments, etc. because there are many ways in which it’s ridiculous to “taking your own risk.” EVERY other advanced nation has universal health insurance, most beginning after America was #1 in life-expectancy in the 1960s. Now we’re 37th.
Posted by: The_Mick | September 14, 2011, 9:11 am 9:11 am
I heard the Cheer too, only in America will they put a price tag on you. I bet the people that Cheered had very good insurance, but what if they lost it? or lost their Job? America is fast becoming one of the worst places to live in the western world, and its the people of america who are at fault, you deserve everything you get. 15 % poverty rate, look at for that to go up.
Posted by: Horizons | September 14, 2011, 9:26 am 9:26 am
In my opinion…Let me say that again in my opinion (for those that may post hateful replys) insurance is a personal responsibility, I have untold family members that sit on their lazy behinds and do not go get jobs, sitting sucking off of us hard working people. There should be a time limit to ALL govt aid. Food stamps, housing, free medical care, and so on. Should be max 6 months and if that person still thinks they are too good to go work at a fast food chain or anywhere for that matter they are cut off! If you think we should be responsible for the untold numbers of people who refuse to get a job and provide themselves with insurance fine, so be it, but it sould not come without limits.
Posted by: TexasGirl2202 | September 14, 2011, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Amy Bingham’s article, being a exaggeration from headline to the last period – helps conservatives prove that ABC is not a “news” source.
In two years, they will use this article as part of a growing body of evidence to petition the FCC to reclassify ABC, CBS, NBC as entertainment – not news. ABC will lose their charter for this.
Posted by: truthtopower | September 14, 2011, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Truthtopower…. reclassifying ABC as something different because of an article written by a reporter is about as likely as FOX being reclassified to a terrorist level because they catered to Glen Beck and others like him.
Posted by: Grace | September 14, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Progressives have no sense of humor or brains. That dumb question presupposed that without treatment the man would die. Most of these types of “users” are in for the sniffles at the ER. Most of them could pay for it if they wanted to, at a regular doctors office visit.
Posted by: shooter | September 14, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Speaking as someone who is gainfully employed – I recently lost my company provided health insurance. I applied for individual coverage and was turned down due to skin cancer I had one year ago. apparantely most of you have not applied for health insurance – none group that is – recently. Someone else I work with also applied and they were turned down too – their only health condition is that they take medication for restless leg syndrome – nothing else. People that try to be responsible for themselves can’t with our health insurance system.
Posted by: Mimi | September 14, 2011, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Last week I went to fill a prescription, I have really good prescription coverage paying only 4 dollars for generics, so the cost of drugs has not been something I have been worrying about. (my major medical sucks though –80/20 with a 2000. deductable ) Well I filled a antibiotic and a migraine medicine.They forgot to run my insurance. My bill was over three hundred dollars for six generic pills and 75 dollars for weeks antibiotic. they reran 8 dollars-This is silly that the cost is that high. We have let the price skyrocket out of control. I am healthy and the only reason I have insurance at all is my work covers most of the cost for insurance, it seems foolish not to spend two hundred a month for myself and my kids even though I really cant afford it. But I know if I lost my job or had to go on FMLA I would lose my insurance at the cost of almost 800 a month. and at my last job I could not afford the insurance as the full cost was on me I just got the tax benefit from taking out of my paycheck, so the kids were on medicaid and I took the gamble. Sorry but when you have to decide between eating and housing or insurance, eating and housing wins. I took a small paycut to get insurance,(preschool teacher to mental health assistant) but its what I had to do
Posted by: TheresaMoore | September 14, 2011, 10:18 am 10:18 am
these are new times; we have forgotten the very principles that once made us unique as a nation. A report today ststes that we have a higher level of poverty, much of it being children, than any timw since the GREAT DEPRESSION. A new streamlined value system is popular; if you don’t have any elevated income level, you don’t amount to much and you don’t count for anything in the overall scheme of our culture.
Posted by: clever bob | September 14, 2011, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Don’t you love those heartless tea party GOP. I beat those who cheered will be first in line to demand government feeding them when they are old.
Posted by: todaypost | September 14, 2011, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Posted by: clever bob—-Poor people have disproportionately more children than none poor people, so more kids will be poor. Americans failed to stay competitive, we were at the top the only place to go was down, especially with the wholesale adoption of Globalization. Labor markets expanded to include 2 billion average people that can do the same job as Americans but for a fraction of the cost, doing the same job as the Chinese will not get you to the middle class, so that means no unskilled jobs, other than the services the knowledge economy can support, and like the other job sectors in the economy, the knowledge economy has enough employees too. Waiting until your 30 to get a college degree won’t help you, getting any online degree won’t help you, getting construction skills won’t help you, and getting a government job will no longer be worth the hassle shortly, and having more kids than you can feed won’t help you, or them. What Dr Paul was referring to was living wills and health Insurance and Long Term disability Insurance.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | September 14, 2011, 10:47 am 10:47 am
“Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die?” to which a small number of audience members shouted “Yeah!” … Unless of course it’s THEMSELVES … then well – cry how “unfair” that is – and “blame the libs” … Typical useless tea party.
Posted by: yeah.i.said.it | September 14, 2011, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Gee ABC – why do you let the conservatives post derogatory comments to the liberals and not vice versa?
Posted by: sidney | September 14, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
I am a moderate, educated independent who thinks that this whole medical mess can never be run by the Federal Government nor should it be. But Mr. Obama thinks that he can cram it down our throats and make us like it. So far so good. But we are in for one heck of a fight on Health Care. We can’t just let people did with no help. I know that many slip through the cracks in the system but we just have to work to close those cracks and keep on working to a better end.
Posted by: cherokee1934 | September 14, 2011, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
The title disgusts me as it is NOT how most tea partiers feel! Most are pro-life! It has long been the responsibility of citizens who have something to give to help those in need. Too many people have fallen from or forgotten this RESPONSIBILITY we have to help each other . This responsibility should not have to be placed on the government’s shoulders.
Many hospitals have foundations that help those who cannot pay their medical bills, but many are swamped and going out of business (especially in the south) because of the overwhelming number of illegal aliens that have no funds to pay, and the question is, who should pay for that?
Also, It is not the federal government’s place to provide medical care. If the states wish to do so, fine. Obamacare will KILL more businesses and jobs than many can comprehend. Check out Obmacare IHop story on youtube to see what I am talking about. The only businesses left will be the Wal-Marts and other large chains. VERY scary how fast we are moving away from what our founding fathers and so many soldiers and others have sacrificed for us to keep. :(
Posted by: Chriskmn | September 14, 2011, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
so why do you need my website?
Posted by: Jr | September 15, 2011, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I think a lot of people are not understanding that cheering for the individual freedom of not purchasing health insurance is the same as cheering for him to die. A lot of people cheered for the individual freedom part, but only a few cheered for letting him die. There in lies the fallacy – it is the same, and the people in the first side don’t actually believe in what they are cheering for, as they didn’t cheer when the question was phrased in a different way.
You can’t have the freedom of choosing to do without without suffering the consequences. The cost of healthcare is not something that can be picked up by churches and other charities. Having hospitals pick up the cost is the same as taxing all of us… do you honestly believe the hospital does not pass that cost onto the rest of us? Further, paying for healthcare by “free” emergency room care is one of the most expensive and least productive ways for managing healthcare.
Posted by: Tech01x | September 15, 2011, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
The Tea Party polled at the BOTTOM of a recent survey about organized groups in America. They are total nihilistic buffoons. It’s good that the average American gets to see what they are really all about. I wish the Beltway Press didn’t have such a love affair with them, but I guess they agree with them. Other nations with decent government supplied health care are doing it at half the cost of America. Our system is about making profits, not health people.
Posted by: 4yourinformation | September 15, 2011, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Until we come to accept death as a normal part of the life cycle in this fallen world that humankind orchestrated when we turned away from the Creator, we will continue to squabble over whether or not we should sustain the shell of a human that was once inhabitated by his or her spirit which, wherever it may commute to, is concerned about much greater and more important things.
Posted by: Mark | September 17, 2011, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Ron Paul is an intelligent person, and yet not carved out to be a sympathetic representative of the people. Forget what the crowd of people said or did not say. The important question is why did Ron Paul remain indifferent to the question asked. He started with a “No” (which is an acceptable and a reasonable answer, were it not qualified by a immoral justification) that the sick can do whatever he wants. This clearly means that Ron Paul wants no part in knowing if someone needing medical care lives or dies. That is a disgusting immoral answer. So every patient who enters emergency care unit could live or die based on his/ her ability to pay? Now give me an answer to further justify such a stupid criteria: Which civilized nation has a policy where it (the country) wants to be indifferent whether a person lives or dies if he/ she cannot afford to pay for health-care. So if you were to avoid such a simple question and tell me “talk about American policies, and not talk what other nations would do in similar case”, then like any good attorney I have another question up my magical sleeve. The question is:, say, Ron Paul goes for an appointed interview for a lucrative and highly compensated position of Administrative and Medical Director of a Health Care Hospital company (which is hypothetically located in the heart-land of America, and is confident that he has the necessary skills and experience to prospectively bag that position), if the panel of interviewers were to ask the same question… that moderator Wolf Blitzer asked, he (Ron Paul) would have un-successfully convinced the interviewers of his capacity to fill that position or commit to the task of Director.
Same negative attitude is also shown by Romney, who in the past did the right thing and acted in the best interests of his constituents in enacting and passing the law of Health Care in the State of MA, now Romney is playing a different flute because he may not be able to convince the Republicans, the conservatives, the Tea Party voters and the vested lobbyists that do not want Health Care Reform in the best interests of nations health. Romney’s answer was other States can decide what they want to do; which is clearly not an answer for the nations health if he desires to represent himself as the future electoral-nominee-candidate for the President of the US.
Posted by: kritik1 | September 18, 2011, 4:43 am 4:43 am
I listened to the debate before seeing this article and honestly, ABC, the title of this article is so sensational and flagrantly anti-Ron Paul that you should seriously reconsider the professionalism of the writer that produced it. Or perhaps journalism isn’t your aim to begin with. Politics are complicated enough without simple-minded generalizations. If citizens could see beyond their partisanism and listen to the candidates rationally and with an even temper, you would surely find that there is more fanfare than truth in these network “news” stations, and usually the candidate with the most intelligence is the one networks like the least.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Taking personal responsibility is wonderful. However, my insurance agent told me that 30% of people who apply for private health insurance are denied. These are people who choose to be responsible for themselves and choose to pay for health insurance, yet cannot do so because the insurance companies who control access to our health care choose not to include them. Further, the AMA states that of the people who declare bankruptcy due to the burden of medical bills, 75% HAD INSURANCE. How is that a reward for taking personal responsibility?
Posted by: Katrina | September 21, 2011, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Hey Emily, I listened to Ron Paul rationally and with an even temper. I find it far beyond absurd that hard working Americans should, must, rely on churches or other fourms of chairity for their healthcare,dont you?
Obviously, there is something wrong here, yha think? When people who work their butt’s off, day in, day out, yet still cant afford healthcare, we as a country have some seriously unfair practices in play.
Actually, I believe its much more than unfair. Accurately put, it’s discusting. It is one thing for someone to have more than someone else. It’s quite another when someone risks death or serious injury because they cant afford, or are denied healthcare.
I listened to Ron Paul and to be frank, he said little or nothing. If his rebuttal is for the churches to take care of people, who in a reality should have exellent health care, its not much of a rebuttal.
Posted by: CriticalMass88 | September 27, 2011, 2:13 am 2:13 am
I will like to know more about Tea Party Debate Audience Cheered Idea of Letting Uninsured Patients Die.
Posted by: johny bans | December 16, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Baaahhhh…..Bahhhh……We all have delusional opinions….Baaahhh!!!! Move along sheople….
Posted by: Derek | February 18, 2012, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm