<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With Friends Like These &#8230;? Bachmann&#8217;s Former Campaign Manager Becoming Her Chief Critic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/with-friends-like-these-bachmanns-former-campaign-manager-becoming-her-chief-critic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/with-friends-like-these-bachmanns-former-campaign-manager-becoming-her-chief-critic/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: talmag</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/with-friends-like-these-bachmanns-former-campaign-manager-becoming-her-chief-critic/#comment-2919591</link>
		<dc:creator>talmag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=64421#comment-2919591</guid>
		<description>One would think that Mr. Rollins would have had more control over his candidate and check some facts before allowing her to say some of the things she did say. I think he left because he knew she was damaging his reputation because he had to have known how flawed she really was as a candidate. Maybe he thought he could turn her around but one cannot put common sense into someone with no sense. However, I am not sure I approve of him bashing her at this time either. To put so much emphasis on the Iowa caucus is foolish because from what I read ...they give out money to people to vote for them so how authentic is this?  I think she sinks her own ship everytime she opens her mouth but she did make one important point in the last GOP debate...about Perry taking money from the pharmacutical firm.  He claims it was only $5,000 but it was more like $50, 000. While I would like to see a female be president one day....she is not what I had in mind.  She is no Hillary nor is Palin so we will have to wait until someome with common sense and intelligence comes along.  There are many out there but they do not want to run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One would think that Mr. Rollins would have had more control over his candidate and check some facts before allowing her to say some of the things she did say. I think he left because he knew she was damaging his reputation because he had to have known how flawed she really was as a candidate. Maybe he thought he could turn her around but one cannot put common sense into someone with no sense. However, I am not sure I approve of him bashing her at this time either. To put so much emphasis on the Iowa caucus is foolish because from what I read &#8230;they give out money to people to vote for them so how authentic is this?  I think she sinks her own ship everytime she opens her mouth but she did make one important point in the last GOP debate&#8230;about Perry taking money from the pharmacutical firm.  He claims it was only $5,000 but it was more like $50, 000. While I would like to see a female be president one day&#8230;.she is not what I had in mind.  She is no Hillary nor is Palin so we will have to wait until someome with common sense and intelligence comes along.  There are many out there but they do not want to run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searambler</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/with-friends-like-these-bachmanns-former-campaign-manager-becoming-her-chief-critic/#comment-2844081</link>
		<dc:creator>Searambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=64421#comment-2844081</guid>
		<description>She is so over, she&#039;s not worth even talking about anymore. Crisis averted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is so over, she&#8217;s not worth even talking about anymore. Crisis averted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CND FOX</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/with-friends-like-these-bachmanns-former-campaign-manager-becoming-her-chief-critic/#comment-2840101</link>
		<dc:creator>CND FOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=64421#comment-2840101</guid>
		<description>I have watched Ed Rollins &#039;operate&#039; for the past decade or so. Tell me now....don&#039;t any of you think that he might have been a &#039;plant&#039; by the GOP to derail a &#039;wing nut&#039; before she destroys their Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have watched Ed Rollins &#8216;operate&#8217; for the past decade or so. Tell me now&#8230;.don&#8217;t any of you think that he might have been a &#8216;plant&#8217; by the GOP to derail a &#8216;wing nut&#8217; before she destroys their Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excfo</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/with-friends-like-these-bachmanns-former-campaign-manager-becoming-her-chief-critic/#comment-2823241</link>
		<dc:creator>excfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=64421#comment-2823241</guid>
		<description>This woman should stop embarrassing herself and her party and with draw her name from consideration as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States: the toughest job in the world.

Her originalist view of the Constitution is enough, on its own to disqualify her. If originalists had been in power in the first half of the 20th century, the government never would have established an Air Corps, or the Air Force, or the Naval and Marine Corps aviation functions. The Constitution mentions specifically only the militia and the Navy as being within Congress&#039;s purview. So, we would have lost both WW! and WW2.  In the immortal words of the great bugs bunny, &quot;what a maroon&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This woman should stop embarrassing herself and her party and with draw her name from consideration as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States: the toughest job in the world.</p>
<p>Her originalist view of the Constitution is enough, on its own to disqualify her. If originalists had been in power in the first half of the 20th century, the government never would have established an Air Corps, or the Air Force, or the Naval and Marine Corps aviation functions. The Constitution mentions specifically only the militia and the Navy as being within Congress&#8217;s purview. So, we would have lost both WW! and WW2.  In the immortal words of the great bugs bunny, &#8220;what a maroon&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>