<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where To Find $1.5 Trillion: &#8216;Super Committee&#8217; Works on Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searambler</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4830962</link>
		<dc:creator>Searambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4830962</guid>
		<description>A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE SURVIVAL OF AMERICA—-LACK OF SUCH IS WHY WE NOW HAVE SUCH TROUBLE—How is it that this concept is in question??
Posted by: James Diffley &#124; October 15, 2011, 5:36 pm.

Because it is a really, really, really, really, really, really STUPID IDEA! In GREAT times, it&#039;s barely noticeable, and can be tolerated. In BAD times, like NOW, it is a horribly BAD idea. And FYI, it could easily result in HIGHER TAXES. Because there is nothing there that says the budget MUST be balanced ONLY with spending cuts. It can ALSO be balanced with REVENUE INCREASES. Like MORE TAXES. And a balanced budget amendment does NOTHING to help high unemployment. That&#039;s why it has never been seriously considered by intelligent people as a viable option............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE SURVIVAL OF AMERICA—-LACK OF SUCH IS WHY WE NOW HAVE SUCH TROUBLE—How is it that this concept is in question??<br />
Posted by: James Diffley | October 15, 2011, 5:36 pm.</p>
<p>Because it is a really, really, really, really, really, really STUPID IDEA! In GREAT times, it&#8217;s barely noticeable, and can be tolerated. In BAD times, like NOW, it is a horribly BAD idea. And FYI, it could easily result in HIGHER TAXES. Because there is nothing there that says the budget MUST be balanced ONLY with spending cuts. It can ALSO be balanced with REVENUE INCREASES. Like MORE TAXES. And a balanced budget amendment does NOTHING to help high unemployment. That&#8217;s why it has never been seriously considered by intelligent people as a viable option&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Diffley</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4655662</link>
		<dc:creator>James Diffley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4655662</guid>
		<description>DUH!!!!!!!   DUH!!!  DUH!! What happens to the minds of politicians when they get elected?? Is there some kind of initiation ceremony that gives them &quot;DUMB&quot; brains?? A drink of some kind?
poisoned cookies? Graft??

A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE SURVIVAL OF AMERICA----

LACK OF SUCH IS WHY WE NOW HAVE SUCH TROUBLE---
How is it that this concept is in question??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DUH!!!!!!!   DUH!!!  DUH!! What happens to the minds of politicians when they get elected?? Is there some kind of initiation ceremony that gives them &#8220;DUMB&#8221; brains?? A drink of some kind?<br />
poisoned cookies? Graft??</p>
<p>A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE SURVIVAL OF AMERICA&#8212;-</p>
<p>LACK OF SUCH IS WHY WE NOW HAVE SUCH TROUBLE&#8212;<br />
How is it that this concept is in question??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheLoyalOpposition</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4438612</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLoyalOpposition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4438612</guid>
		<description>Forrest Gump 9:02 pm (&quot;Stupid is as stupid does!&quot;) ------ You should know that ALL spending originates in Congress!!! ------ So a better way to look at spending is by looking at WHO CONTROLLED CONGRESS!!! ------- Since 12/31/1980, the national debt has increased from $930Billion to $14.8Trillion. --- During that time, when the control of the House and Senate was SPLIT, the debt increased $1.7 Trillion --- when congress was ALL GOP, the debt increased by $3.3 Trillion --- and when congress was ALL DEMOCRAT, the debt went up $8.9 Trillion! ----- Facts don’t lie!! ----- So you can see that Obama is just another TAX AND SPEND DEMOCRAT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forrest Gump 9:02 pm (&#8220;Stupid is as stupid does!&#8221;) &#8212;&#8212; You should know that ALL spending originates in Congress!!! &#8212;&#8212; So a better way to look at spending is by looking at WHO CONTROLLED CONGRESS!!! &#8212;&#8212;- Since 12/31/1980, the national debt has increased from $930Billion to $14.8Trillion. &#8212; During that time, when the control of the House and Senate was SPLIT, the debt increased $1.7 Trillion &#8212; when congress was ALL GOP, the debt increased by $3.3 Trillion &#8212; and when congress was ALL DEMOCRAT, the debt went up $8.9 Trillion! &#8212;&#8211; Facts don’t lie!! &#8212;&#8211; So you can see that Obama is just another TAX AND SPEND DEMOCRAT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheLoyalOpposition</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4436262</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLoyalOpposition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4436262</guid>
		<description>The entire approach is still a big problem!!! ----- We agree to raise the debt ceiling TODAY... and plan to pay it back with cuts over the next TEN YEARS!!! ----- When will DC ever wise up... we need REAL CUTS now!!! ----- I hope after the next election we will be able to see REAL fiscal responsibility... because we certainly don&#039;t have it now!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire approach is still a big problem!!! &#8212;&#8211; We agree to raise the debt ceiling TODAY&#8230; and plan to pay it back with cuts over the next TEN YEARS!!! &#8212;&#8211; When will DC ever wise up&#8230; we need REAL CUTS now!!! &#8212;&#8211; I hope after the next election we will be able to see REAL fiscal responsibility&#8230; because we certainly don&#8217;t have it now!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest Gump is a Republican</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4436032</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Gump is a Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4436032</guid>
		<description>I hate to say it &quot;Forrest Gump&quot; Republicans, but it&#039;s been 30 years of Republican policies of &quot;Tax Cuts&quot; without simultaneous leadership emphasis on &quot;spending cuts&quot; that have put us in this mess.  If you disagree, then why is it that the two largest incremental jumps in &quot;per president&quot; debt increases in the past 30 years BOTH occurred under Republican administrations?

We went from &quot;billion dollar debt increases per president&quot; to &quot;~2 Trillion dollar debt increases per president&quot; under a Republican named Ronald Reagan... and then we went from that Reagan standard to a new standard of &quot;~5 Trillion dollar debt increases&quot; under another Republican named G.W. Bush.

Geeze folks, do you think these huge incremental leaps in debt accumulation may have something to do with tax cuts (without cuts in spending)? ... it&#039;s not rocket science... LOL!

Nixon / Ford Debt Increase = $292 Billion
Carter Debt Increase = $280 Billion

REAGAN &quot;TAX CUTS&quot; (without cuts in spending) RESULTS:
Reagan Debt Increase (and Reagan had a Republican Senate for 6 of his 8 years) = $1.7 Trillion
(the &quot;Reagan Standard&quot; is established)

George H.W. Bush (Bush # 1) Debt Increase = $1.4 Trillion
Clinton Debt Increase = $1.6 Trillion

BUSH TAX CUTS (without cuts in spending) RESULTS:
George W. Bush (Bush # 2) Debt Increase = $4.9 Trillion
(the &quot;Reagan Standard&quot; has now been replaced with the &quot;Bush Standard&quot;)

Obama is correct... and at least he has the leadership courage to address tax increases (unlike Reagan and Bush 2, who didn&#039;t have the courage to address spending cuts)... to get rid of our deficit, we need A COMBINATION OF SPENDING CUTS COMBINED WITH TAX INCREASES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it &#8220;Forrest Gump&#8221; Republicans, but it&#8217;s been 30 years of Republican policies of &#8220;Tax Cuts&#8221; without simultaneous leadership emphasis on &#8220;spending cuts&#8221; that have put us in this mess.  If you disagree, then why is it that the two largest incremental jumps in &#8220;per president&#8221; debt increases in the past 30 years BOTH occurred under Republican administrations?</p>
<p>We went from &#8220;billion dollar debt increases per president&#8221; to &#8220;~2 Trillion dollar debt increases per president&#8221; under a Republican named Ronald Reagan&#8230; and then we went from that Reagan standard to a new standard of &#8220;~5 Trillion dollar debt increases&#8221; under another Republican named G.W. Bush.</p>
<p>Geeze folks, do you think these huge incremental leaps in debt accumulation may have something to do with tax cuts (without cuts in spending)? &#8230; it&#8217;s not rocket science&#8230; LOL!</p>
<p>Nixon / Ford Debt Increase = $292 Billion<br />
Carter Debt Increase = $280 Billion</p>
<p>REAGAN &#8220;TAX CUTS&#8221; (without cuts in spending) RESULTS:<br />
Reagan Debt Increase (and Reagan had a Republican Senate for 6 of his 8 years) = $1.7 Trillion<br />
(the &#8220;Reagan Standard&#8221; is established)</p>
<p>George H.W. Bush (Bush # 1) Debt Increase = $1.4 Trillion<br />
Clinton Debt Increase = $1.6 Trillion</p>
<p>BUSH TAX CUTS (without cuts in spending) RESULTS:<br />
George W. Bush (Bush # 2) Debt Increase = $4.9 Trillion<br />
(the &#8220;Reagan Standard&#8221; has now been replaced with the &#8220;Bush Standard&#8221;)</p>
<p>Obama is correct&#8230; and at least he has the leadership courage to address tax increases (unlike Reagan and Bush 2, who didn&#8217;t have the courage to address spending cuts)&#8230; to get rid of our deficit, we need A COMBINATION OF SPENDING CUTS COMBINED WITH TAX INCREASES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suzieq</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4421501</link>
		<dc:creator>suzieq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4421501</guid>
		<description>CEASE CORN SUBSIDIES. BETTER HEALTH, SAVE MONEY...NO BRAINER!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CEASE CORN SUBSIDIES. BETTER HEALTH, SAVE MONEY&#8230;NO BRAINER!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmferretti</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4412401</link>
		<dc:creator>tmferretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4412401</guid>
		<description>Do the republicans actually believe that if defense cuts are triggered, millions of workers in the defense industry won&#039;t lose their jobs?  The tea party republicans refused to go along with the Obama-Boehner compromise that could have reduced the deficit by 4 trillion dollars and passed this idiotic super committee idea.  

They live in a fantasy world where there is no cause and effect.  Their world consists of people who believe Americans aren&#039;t rich because we&#039;re all lazy and unmotivated.   Americans aren&#039;t stupid; the republicans will find this out on Nov 11, 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the republicans actually believe that if defense cuts are triggered, millions of workers in the defense industry won&#8217;t lose their jobs?  The tea party republicans refused to go along with the Obama-Boehner compromise that could have reduced the deficit by 4 trillion dollars and passed this idiotic super committee idea.  </p>
<p>They live in a fantasy world where there is no cause and effect.  Their world consists of people who believe Americans aren&#8217;t rich because we&#8217;re all lazy and unmotivated.   Americans aren&#8217;t stupid; the republicans will find this out on Nov 11, 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greggw</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/deficit-super-committee-working-against-the-clock-on-deal/#comment-4410731</link>
		<dc:creator>Greggw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=124731#comment-4410731</guid>
		<description>This story just reports tht there is nothing to report. The current continuing resolution expired 18 Nov, before the &quot;super committee&quot; report is due. There is a strong possibility of brinkmanship and possibly eve a government shutdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story just reports tht there is nothing to report. The current continuing resolution expired 18 Nov, before the &#8220;super committee&#8221; report is due. There is a strong possibility of brinkmanship and possibly eve a government shutdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>