Nov 8, 2011 1:21pm

Ron Paul Calls Elizabeth Warren a “Socialist,” Says Government Goes Too Far

 

Ron Paul called Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren “a socialist” and suggested the federal highway system was a mistake.

“Nightline” anchor Terry Moran read to Paul a widely cited viral video defense of government by Warren, the consumer advocate who is running for U.S. Senate as a Democrat.

ABC News and Yahoo News, one year out from election day 2012, are interviewing all of the major Republican presidential candidates. And none of them more purely represents the small government ethos than Paul.

He responded to Warren’s argument that a wealthy person has benefited from government in areas like security and roads and should give back.

“She’s a socialist,” Paul said. “She wants the government to do all this.”

“When the state runs things that is a socialist idea that it should be collective,” he said. “I preach home schooling and private schooling and competition in schools.”

“But what she forgets – she’s right. By the use of force… the government comes with a gun and they take money from you and they build a highway that incidentally you can use because you don’t have any other choices.”

“Governments are always destructive in the production of wealth,” said Paul. “They pretend they are going to take care of us like  - well the government is going to give us a house  – look at what happened to the house. The big guys all got bailed out who ripped us off and the derivatives in the bank, they’re still being protected. Middle class lost it and they lost their houses, so her whole argument is wrong.”

The libertarian leaning Republican candidate for president also weighed in on foreign policy. He said that if he were president, U.S. allies would be on their own.

Paul said that if South Korea, Taiwan, or Israel were attacked, a Paul White House wouldn’t immediately respond, adding that he would study the situation and if warranted, ask Congress to retaliate. He argued that that treaties don’t amend the Constitution and making future generations honor those treaties would be wrong.

Such a radical redefinition of America’s role in the world is at odds with the most conservative members of  his party.

Paul’s plans have been criticized by fellow GOP rival Rick Santorum as being “irrational” and a voter in Concord, New Hampshire, told Paul at a campaign stop that he’s “off his rocker.”

Paul defended extending the Bush tax cuts in a time of austerity by insisting that if you’re rich and productive, you shouldn’t be punished.

Paul has also been dogged recently with questions about a possible third party run if he falls short in the Republican primary. Paul said he’s has “no intention” of running on a third-party ticket.

But not all the questions revolved around policy and politics. Paul revealed that his favorite junk food is chocolate chip cookies, he uses an iPad, and although he doesn’t watch a lot of TV, he said he does watch ABC News.

SHOWS:

User Comments

We’re only trying to HELP YOU!

Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Adam | November 8, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“we would be living in a world more like the 1800′s, where the wealthy and privileged commonly took advantage of other less fortunate and basically practiced economic slavery. ”

In a free society, the only way to enjoy large profits is to produce goods and services that people want. A society where a privileged and wealthy few (the Washington DC area is the highest income in the US) are able to practice economic slavery through the use of force, i.e. taxation, is Elizabeth Warren’s world, not Dr. Paul’s.

Posted by: Jordan | November 8, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

@ Drano Wrong the role of our government is to defend our liberty as outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

Posted by: Nunya Biznezz | November 8, 2011, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

@Drano, That’s the way it is now!!!!! You have just described our problem that he wants to fix! Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2011, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Ron Paul is the only one telling us the truth. It’s said that “God helps those who help themselves.” God gave us Ron Paul. Let us not squander this opportunity to save our Republic.

Posted by: Rob3rt | November 8, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Elizabeth Warren is a Marxist. But even with her Marxist take she makes no sense. The roads were built with government funds. Where did the government finds come from? It came from taxpayers. Who are the taxpayers? The company that is using it is one of them. So they are using something they paid for. What about the roads that Warren used to go to her job. I paid for them. I want her job now so she is obliged to give me the job since I aid taxes and she used the road to go to work. She is a very stupid lady. Just because you put a few letters after your name doesn’t mean you are smart. Many of the world’s brutal dictators were well educated and came from affluent families.

Posted by: MoRacker | November 8, 2011, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

DRANO-Government’s role is not to protect the status quo. If you want the status quo, vote for Romney or Obama. If you don’t like the status quo, vote Ron Paul. Only the banking elites and the 1-percenters like Elizabeth Warren don’t want his views heard about honest money and lawful government.

Posted by: dan_webster | November 8, 2011, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Ya gotta love how this article some how implies that a declaration of war is a “radical redefinition”. A declaration of war is defined in our constitution dimwit, it’s the presidents of the last 60 or so years that have been radically redefining the constitution.

Posted by: John | November 8, 2011, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

“fool”, “jackass”, “economic slavery”, “protect the status quo”. Another hit and run template response. Maybe you should listen to what Ron Paul is saying. I heard him say that those that benefitted from the bubbles and the bailouts should be taxed and punished and that the middle class pays the price for government debt and bailouts through the inflation tax. I heard him say that we should differentiate between the rich who create jobs, goods and services and those who benefit from government bailouts and bubbles. Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama are the status quo. Ron Paul is their biggest nightmare. We elected Obama to “advance the idea of social and economic progress”. How’s that working out?

Posted by: gregbo | November 8, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Ron Paul has a couple good ideas wrapped up in a whole slew of completely idiotic ones based on a fantasy of his own making. He will NEVER be our president for a very good reason: he is unconnected from the real world……….

Posted by: Searambler | November 8, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“Such a radical redefinition of America’s role in the world is at odds with the most conservative members of his party.”

And this is where either party went wrong. We have a Constitution that BOTH parties seem to think they have the right to trample on. I hope he does run 3rd party-neither one deserves his honesty and integrity. I will write him in if he doesn’t take the nomination, as will ost if not all of his supporters. GOP better think about this.

Posted by: Nlanigan | November 8, 2011, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Jack, I can’t believe you wrote: “Paul’s plans have been criticized by fellow GOP rival Rick Santorum as being “irrational”. Give me a break! Let’s see now. In 2011, Ron Paul has received $107,579 in donations from our active military and Rick Santorum has received…drum roll…a whopping $750 !!
Yep, $750 from our military and you think Santorum is qualified to say that Ron’s foreign policy is irrational. Ha! I will side with our troops. They know what the hell is going on.

Posted by: Jack | November 8, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

nlanigan said, “I hope he does run 3rd party-neither one deserves his honesty and integrity.”

He tried that once. Failed miserably. Second time, he ran as a Republican. Again, failed miserably. THIS time, he’s a Republican slash Tea Party darling. Odds are very good he will fare EXACTLY the same as he has fared in the past…………

Posted by: Searambler | November 8, 2011, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

One article per week over the past month trying to discredit Dr. Ron Paul. Google it… Mr. Volack, your name alone makes me nauseous. I’m curious, what motivate an ABC Political ‘blogger’ to mount such a one man personal smear campaign against Ron Paul??

Posted by: Todd | November 8, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

HIT JOB!!!!! Ron Paul is NOT arguing against highways, education, and military. He is educating Americans and letting you know there is more than one way to skin a cat. Anyone who looks at their paycheck and honestly believes that the Federal Government is doing a good job with the $$ they take, and is willing to give more, is truly living in a fantasy world!

Posted by: mookie | November 8, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

For those who think Ron Paul is a “fool”:

1. How could you have any fewer problems with the current president and the other GOP candidates?
2. With the current condition of this country, could Ron Paul really make things any worse? (the answer is no)

Don’t exaggerate his positions, use your brains, and you would clearly see he’s the man for the job.

Posted by: AKA | November 8, 2011, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Searambler wrote: Odds are very good he will fare EXACTLY the same as he has fared in the past…………

I’m willing to bet on that. Are you? I think you should leave MSM alone and do your research :)

Posted by: Nlanigan | November 8, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

This is the epitome of a hit piece.

Posted by: Joe M | November 8, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

John, unfortunately following the Constitution would be a “radical redefinition” of modern day politics and law. We have been conditioned over many decades, little by little until where at the point where the Constitution is just a peace of paper. Most modern day politicians are simply a byproduct of the political system.

Posted by: Eddie | November 8, 2011, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Ron Paul is an idiot who will never even come CLOSE to winning the Presidency. In the extremely unlikely event that he gets enough crackpot college wannabe-rebels to get him the nomination, he will look extremely stupid the moment he has to get up on a national stage and explain how the country is going to work with effectively no income and no ability to interact with the outside world.

All the fanboys screaming on the internet about how he’s a mythical man of destiny can’t change reality.

Posted by: Slash | November 8, 2011, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Ron Paul is nuts.

Posted by: T. Ferguson | November 8, 2011, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Paul is the only one who understands more then just politics, Americans simply don’t deserve to have him as a president, they will suffer for their ignorance and so will their children. My support and respect goes to Dr. Paul! I’m from Europe by the way.

Posted by: lora | November 8, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Jason M. Volack seems to have a special interest in Senator Paul as he puts out one warm piece of trash out after the next trying to discredit him. About one a week over the last month.

Posted by: Todd Ruiter | November 8, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

We as a country have strayed so far from the Constitution, that most folks do not really know what it is all about. I am for the rule of law. I am for the United States Constitution. I am for RON PAUL.
Case closed.

Posted by: Michael Mihelich | November 8, 2011, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Every person that is completely negative about Ron Paul I’ve found knows NOTHING about him. Their facts are incorrect and they can’t cite where they get their crazy notions from. Why can’t people just do their research on a candidate before making an opinion?

Posted by: Sovereign | November 8, 2011, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

RP – on if an ally were attacked “…adding that he would study the situation and if warranted, ask Congress to retaliate. He argued that that treaties don’t amend the Constitution and making future generations honor those treaties would be wrong.
Such a radical redefinition of America’s role in the world is at odds with the most conservative members of his party.” – I would hardly call this a “redefinition”. I’d call the constant war and going to war without congressional approval a “redefinition”

Posted by: Climberboi | November 8, 2011, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Ron Paul is the only candidate who will end this mass stupidity. No more wars, spying, torture, inflation, or debt. If you are in favor of any of those, then please, leave this country and don’t return. The Republicrats have done enough damage to this nation, and WE are taking it away from them.

RON PAUL IN 2012 (OR NOTHING)

Posted by: Seamus | November 8, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

I remember reading once how a psychiatrist clams that when a person in a dysfunctional family tries to make some healthy changes many times they will call him crazy because it disrupts the family dynamics.

Posted by: Abe | November 8, 2011, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

RP 2012!!!

Ron Paul has 3 main Points that we need represented now in this country.
1- Make IRS history
2- Make FED history
3- Any of his “strange” or “wierd” points he will not have time for because he will be too busy trying to accomplish the first 2 very important points.

Posted by: bradm2112 | November 8, 2011, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Ron Paul represents a phenomenon that has inflected the U.S. political process: overly-simplistic ideologies used to comfort people instead of educating or informing them. From a philosophy standpoint I’m interested in what libertarins say- well, some of the time. Most of their policies ideas don’t make sense with the world the way it is.

Posted by: Loren Taylor | November 8, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Is this article about the same interview I watched?

“He said that if he were president, U.S. allies would be on their own.” That isn’t what he said.

“Paul defended extending the Bush tax cuts in a time of austerity by insisting that if you’re rich and productive, you shouldn’t be punished.” That isn’t what he said either.

Jason, please stick to reporting. I don’t need you to put words into your interviewer’s mouth.

Posted by: Bart | November 8, 2011, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

I would ask ron paul how come the nordic countries, japan, and some western european countries when compared to the US have either very progressive tax brackets and government investments at a much higher rate in the economy and/or very low income inequality, and also the highest living standards in the world. I am NOT arguing there is a casual connection, just a correlation. Still, America has comparably lower taxes, less governmental investment as percentage of GDP, and very high income inequality, and rates either average or below average on many quality of life indicators. Why is this?

Posted by: normative | November 8, 2011, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

“The man who reads nothing at all, is better educated, than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”
—Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: powder1 | November 8, 2011, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

The commenters who mock Ron Paul are an indication of how far gone this Republic is.

Ron Paul is not just mouthing his ideas and concepts. Ron Paul is really the most pure American candidate because he simply expresses the laws (Constitution) and principles (Bill of Rights) that made America the exceptional nation it once was.

It’s really very simple. Abolish the FED/IRS Complex. Restore the Constitution as law of the land. Legalize freedom. Stop the global empire building.
Do these things and America will once again be the envy of the world. And no nation on earth will dare to attack a true superpower with a strong defense.

Ron Paul would be a terrifing president if he decared a just war. He would get approval from Congress and prosecute a brutal, swift and victorious campaign. No quagmires who’s sole purpose is to enrich the military industrial complex. No nation building to enrich DOD contractors and loot our treasury.

Posted by: Angelo S. | November 8, 2011, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

“Paul’s plans have been criticized by fellow GOP rival Rick Santorum as being “irrational” and a voter in Concord, New Hampshire, told Paul at a campaign stop that he’s “off his rocker.”

A “voter” said so. You can find a “voter” to say something negative about ANY candidate, so why is this crap relevant? Is what this anonymous “voter” says pivotal in the campaign for president?

Sorry, but you can’t sneak-in yellow journalism and expect to get away with it. We sheep know how to read.

Posted by: William Delano Gaston | November 8, 2011, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Loren, I’m interested to know whether you think the goal of our society should be to keep the world the way it is or to try to improve it. I’m quite sure you and I will disagree on how to improve our world, but I’m very curious whether you think things are fine or not. I’m not a Libertarian, but I don’t think his voting records reflects, necessarily, Libertarianism. It seems to reflect a devotion to the U.S. Constitution, even when he personally disagrees with the document’s stance on particular issues. Shouldn’t our leaders be bound to law that allows for changes based on the world we live in? I guess it is better to have bureaucratic agencies and employees (one of ten adult Americans works for government at some level) making all of our decisions than leaving it up to the ninety percent they are supposed to serve.

Posted by: Joseph | November 8, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it was realized that our liberties and wealth were in jeopardy.” – Ron Paul

Posted by: Centinel | November 8, 2011, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

“A New Hampshire voter told Paul he was off his rocker” This is the second or third time this site has had this quote on it but they never mention it was a senile old woman confined to a nursing home that Paul was touring.She was literally ON her rocker and probably thought we were still at war with Japan.

Posted by: professorjoe | November 8, 2011, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Ron Paul is undoubtedly the Thomas Jefferson of our times. He has a deep understand of economic policies, the Fed and foreign policy. His track record is impeccable, and his honesty can be matched by none. I found all this out not from the main stream media, but by reading about Dr. Paul. Do yourself a favour and look up this guy.

No one has a campaign like Ron Paul. He is a candidate of THE PEOPLE. He raises money on the internet via small donations ($50-$100) from individuals. No corporate funds, no wall street funds, no lobbyists. NOT a single candidate has this much support of the masses and no outside influence. He will deliver real change that people are craving, but the media is trying very hard not to let the truth get out about Dr. Paul. You want more Obama Change, pick Cain, or any of the other candidates. Occupy Wall street, you want real change?? Ron Paul is your man.

Posted by: Rich | November 8, 2011, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Watch the video. Listen.

Posted by: NadePaulKuciGravMcKi | November 8, 2011, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I wonder why all these so called “journalists” always see fit to include some random persons opinion of Paul in their articles. And its always the ones calling him “whacko” or something stupid like that. Why don’t you try posting opinions about his foreign policy from actual veterans instead of some no name voter from New Hampshire.

Posted by: jason | November 8, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Either the Republican party gets behind Ron Paul, or they lose this election. Their pick. In the end, it makes me no difference if it is a neocon or Obama in the White House. One is just as bad as the other.

Posted by: Pete | November 8, 2011, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

reading these comments gives me hope for america, maybe even the whole world: no matter how damning your hit piece attempts to be…all you do is draw more attention to this man and his greatness

Posted by: progenitus | November 8, 2011, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Calm down people who desire a government master – Ron Paul was only being honest.

And you can do better – you don’t need to be a slave.

Posted by: Antonio | November 8, 2011, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

These articles are getting old, the establishment is scared to death of Dr Paul. Some of these comments are pathetic do you really love sucking money from the government? The government has control of everything except the air you breathe and they will take that too if you allow them. In a free market WE the people control the economy not the government, look at what happened when they tried to house people Fail banks got bailed out and the middle class got screwed, look at USPS, FAIL they’re going down, UPS, Fed Ex, private companies continue to lead the way, why? Because WE the people keep them in business. Ron Paul 2012 grow up the Dr. Is not scary he has the cure

Posted by: Christian | November 8, 2011, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Thank you for a great interview with Dr Ron Paul. I really like to see more interviews with him. keep them coming he is so amazing to learn from and has wonderful ideas for our country. I am so Thankful to have him to vote for in a gop presidential candidate. I am a proud American to have a man of such great experience in economics, and forign policy.

Posted by: tanoria | November 8, 2011, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

I Love HIm :) great interview keep them coming from Dr Paul.. ron paul 2012

Posted by: taba | November 8, 2011, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Ron Paul 2012… my friends and foes we must ban together to save our country in its most dire of times. The world is not safe right now and what stability you see in the world is an illusion, just as your wealth is. Look at what is happening to Greece right now. That is going to spread across Europe and i promise you it will come here. Imagine a worldwide Greatest Depression and the power eiltes of the world will let it happen and keep it there. When many die off from social unrest, famine, and police state brutality they will then “save us” and give us a One World Bank, a New World Order. That will be the end of the beacon of freedom known as America, and the beginning of a global tyranny of lies, deceit, and force. Believe me folks we are driving toward a cliff in the fog and no one but Ron Paul is willing to recognize and change our ways. When you take a step back and look at all the problems we have they all stem from government. Goverment is the problem, not rich people, not poor people… to be fair i would say that the problem is the collusion of big government and big business, but if government is big enough to corrupt then there is no incentive to do it. Look at what Obama is doing right now, everything that FDR did to prolong the depression and instead of blaming government they want you to believe greed is what did, capitalism is flawed by greed, when in reality all progress across the world has been done in the name of greed. Is it selfish to want a good life? To keep what you have earned? To want your freedom, your property, to own your body? I think it is what makes a human great. Remember Libertarianism is what our country was founded on and it made us the strongest country in the world. Now the UN, IMF, NATO, and other international bodies have tried to syphon off our wealth, our military might (for their benefit), and our liberties in the name of tyranny and have done so effectively through public schools and pop culture. The world is going down, i know you feel it. Just know Ron Paul is our last chance to sway the tide of tyranny and bring us back to sanity and our way of life… For freedom in every way possible i dedicate my time and my vote to Ron Paul 2012. You know he is right…

Posted by: matt | November 8, 2011, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

The following is what I would like to hear Ron Paul say at the next debate.

“I have been called a “grumpy old man, by one of my opponents,” and if I appear that way it is because I am very disgruntled when I look at the future of the United States of America, the country I love and have served for many years first as a member of the military and then for 23 years in Congress.

“I know I do not fit the Hollywood picture of a leading man auditioning for the role of President of the United States. But my generation has experience. We have lived through many dangers including the greatest war this world has ever known. And I am running for President because I see the country I love plunging headlong into a crisis even greater than the crisis we faced in World War II. We won that war because of our faith in God and the beliefs espoused by our forefathers of liberty, freedom and individual responsibility that built the United States into the most prosperous country in the world.

“My fellow Americans, you are not alone if you feel something missing in today’s America. We are losing our individual liberty and freedom because we as a country are turning our backs on individual responsibility. Too many have listened to the siren song of “collective responsibility.” We are told that as individuals we do not need to take care of ourselves and our fellow citizens any longer, the government will do it. We are told that we do not have to insist that the government live within its means, that that is a problem for future generations.

“The consequences are grim. The United States of America is facing the gravest crisis in its existence. We are bankrupt and living on borrowed money. Some have called me a prophet because I have correctly predicted past consequences of our actions. Be that as it may, I am predicting now that when our debts are finally called, the collapse of the dollar will make the Great Depression of the 1930′s seem like a minor bump in the road. And we will take the economies of the industrialized countries of the world with us. If that happens, the beacon of liberty the United States of America represents to the rest of the world will be lost.

“But there is hope. We can still reverse the dangerous course this country is on. But we must take action now and that action cannot be minor. We must reduce the size of our federal government and bring it back within the framework of our Constitution so that it again assumes its proper position as the servant of the people, not their master. I have offered a sound proposal for such a reduction in government in my Plan to Restore America that will cut federal spending one trillion dollars the first year and balance the budget within three years while still protecting Social Security.

“Others will try to tell you that all we need to do to solve our problems is tinker with the existing form of government. They say they are for smaller government but “Where’s the beef?” Where are their proposals that cut the size of government and restore the value of the dollar?

“We can no longer ignore the danger we are facing. We must act and we must act now. If you love your country, if you want your children and your grandchildren to live in prosperity and peace, I beg that you demand of the candidate you select to run in the next presidential election that he or she confront the very real crisis this country is facing. It is my hope that I can be that candidate.”

Posted by: P. R. Robinson | November 8, 2011, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

True Issue of the Day
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks [Un-Federal Reserve] to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around, will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
—Thomas Jefferson, letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin, 1802
“I predict future happiness for Americans [100%], if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
“Government spending is a “tax” burden on the American people and is never equally or fairly distributed. The poor and low-middle income workers always suffer the most from the deceitful tax of inflation and borrowing.”
—Congressman Ron Paul
Audit the Fed/End the Fed
OVERTURN THE TABLES IN THE DEN OF THIEVES

Posted by: powder1 | November 8, 2011, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

How is his foreign policy radical? Mind your own business and only engage in fights that are necessary for the US well being, win the fight and come home. Besides that, deal with countries in a respectful manner and engage in mutually beneficial trade.
This is the foreign policy of George Washington, and we would be wise to return to it.
ABC News; really? Where do you get these amateur writers?

Posted by: Michael | November 8, 2011, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Interstate highways are bad? No wonder Ron Paul can’t get above single digits.

Posted by: Max Fenster | November 8, 2011, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

True Issue of the Day
“Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have. The course of history shows us that as a government grows, liberty decreases.”
—Thomas Jefferson
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks [Un-Federal Reserve] to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around, will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
—Thomas Jefferson, letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin, 1802
“I predict future happiness for Americans [100%], if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
—Thomas Jefferson
“Government spending is a “tax” burden on the American people and is never equally or fairly distributed. The poor and low-middle income workers always suffer the most from the deceitful tax of inflation and borrowing.”
—Congressman Ron Paul
Audit the Fed/End the Fed
OVERTURN THE TABLES IN THE DEN OF THIEVES

Posted by: powder1 | November 8, 2011, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

“Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have. The course of history shows us that as a government grows, liberty decreases.”
—Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: powder1 | November 8, 2011, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

It should be obvious to anyone who pays attention that when the government spends money, there are lobbyists there to make sure somebody gets their share. Who are those somebodies? Rich folks. They might say they’re buying thing FOR poor folk, but who are they buying it FROM? Rich folks. That’s the corollary to Paul’s philosophy of leaving rich folk alone. Leave them alone – don’t take from them, don’t give to them. Instead, lets let the middle class keep what they earn so they can BECOME rich.
The newly rich and the old rich, they would ENJOY giving if it weren’t forced from them at gunpoint. Who likes that? I know I don’t, and I don’t even have much money.

Posted by: Louis Nardozi | November 8, 2011, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

@ normative. You were talking about Japan and other countries doing so great with their progressive taxes. Well you do know at one point the media and politicians were in love with the Soviet Union and look what happened to them. Oh and Italy before World War 2. Read something about economics and government. I’d read some Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, and Bastiat.

Posted by: Christopher Orick | November 8, 2011, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I love Dr. Paul. Always sticks to his guns.

RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!
REVOLUTION

Posted by: Paul Revere | November 8, 2011, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Media keeps talking about third party, because they’re freaking out. They know Ron Paul will win Iowa in the Primary. I can’t wait!!!!

Posted by: Jerry | November 8, 2011, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Paul says “I preach home schooling and private schooling”

So….if both parents have to work and can’t home school, and can’t afford private school…then what?

This alone has made me disregard this man as woefully out of touch.

Posted by: Lee | November 8, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

The Interstate Highway system, lobbied for by auto manufacturers, DESTROYED rails and trains as the optimum form of transportation and set back shared transportation in the US. Thanks to the public highway system, we now all use cars instead of trains, which has lead to increased oil consumption, deleterious effects on foreign policy, suburban sprawl, and more pollution.

Ron Paul is right.

Posted by: metamemetics | November 9, 2011, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I’m disappointed, as always, with how much rhetoric and “politics” are involved in politics. I watched the interviews for each candidate, and it seems to me like some of the candidates were not getting equal, unbiased interviews. Ron Paul’s seemed to be one of the worst.

The most prominent example would be how all the front running candidates were asked to discuss how they planned on clenching a victory, while Paul was only asked if he was going to go third party. This seems like Terry Moran was pretty much saying Ron Paul had no chance whatsoever to win the republican vote, while polls place him in a close third. There are plenty more examples, but this one was the most aggravating to me because it was just so… sneaky….

Posted by: irrelevant | November 9, 2011, 3:04 am 3:04 am

@Lee, you assume that for some reason private schools wont be competitive and make it affordable for people so they will have people pay to attend there. That is the problem with the way people think. They forget that a free market must be competitive and will mold their environment.

Posted by: Eddy4 | November 9, 2011, 8:00 am 8:00 am

I see a lot of people here misrepresenting what Ms. Warren has said. She didn’t say that companies pay no taxes and that they didn’t help pay for roads. She is saying that companies and individuals paid the taxes that built the roads but our present tax system is tilted strongly towards rich people and corporations to they DON’T pay their fair share.

If you are nuts enough to believe that things would be better if all our roads were privately produced (we gonna have tolls every 30 feet?) then you might believe that Ms. Warren said that the rich and powerful should pay for everything.

If banks can get laws twisted to give them welfare (to the tune of trillions of dollars – trillions!) then someone has to speak out for those who don’t have a voice. I have only read about her in the news and heard her speak on TV but what she has said seems rational to me

Calling her a Marxist is equivalent to calling Romney a fascist. Actually the fascist label is much more appropriate for most of the Repub candidates. Blind patriotism, strengthening the rich and powerful rather than representing the individual, etc.

Posted by: Fladabosco | November 9, 2011, 8:13 am 8:13 am

oscar the grouch loves chocolate chip cookies. haha…
just kidding. give them hell Ron!

Posted by: Tom | November 9, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am

If we are sick and tired of the same garbage that comes in and goes out 0NO MATTER THE PARTY- then, we have the simple solution, vote for a change and stop complaining, but for God’s sake, do something that will benefit society not only you,
VOTE RONPAUL2012!!

Posted by: MinhaPhiloec | November 9, 2011, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Paul stands Tall. He is a giant among the GOP midgets. Is there a doctor in the house? There will be – Dr. Ron Paul in the White House! 2012. Go Ron Go!

Posted by: belle | November 9, 2011, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Ron Paul is for choice! If you don’t like sending your kids to public school, you should be able to send your kid to private school or home school them. Some states are outlawing home schooling. He is against the government telling you how to educate your child! As a parent, you are a child’s first teacher! You teach them how to act, talk, walk, potty, and explore. As they age, the PARENT is responsible for teaching the child RESPECT, ACCOUNTABILITY, and MANNERS! I agree with Ron Paul. NO ONE should tell me where I MUST send my child to school.

Posted by: Jamie | November 9, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

@P.R. Robinson — very, very good. RP2012!

Posted by: Lizz | November 9, 2011, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Every time Ron Paul talks the knee jerk going into a dance. I am telling you that people really do not understand what he is saying, and I do not blame them- he presents such a different platform that people cannot even imagine what real change could be like.

Hopefully though more and more will debate then inevitably get infuriated enough to do some actual research and watch a few interviews, and speeches he has done for themselves.

Posted by: EgadsNo | November 9, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

I noticed that the people who are anti Paul have nothing to say that can be backed up.No facts.No issues.Nothing.I suspect it is just Volack using different computers around the office.

Posted by: Julian Alien | November 9, 2011, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Ron Paul may be president if the blue democrats fall in behind him.
Any democrat who feels betrayed by their national party for the candidate
that they were saddled with ought to look to Ron Paul, unless of course they
want to compound their 2008 error.

Posted by: ewkeane | November 9, 2011, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Paul cannot be argued or marginalized. Everything he says is absolutely correct, unfortunately people don’t like hearing constitutional truth, it makes them uncomfortable. Look where that philosophy has gotten us.

Posted by: wsjiii | November 10, 2011, 11:17 am 11:17 am

“In a free society, the only way to enjoy large profits is to produce goods and services that people want.”

You are missing a key element of classical economics; namely, one of the two things that inhibit proper market function. That element is market power. Specifically, if a firm or group of firms possesses undue market power, the market cannot function properly. That is one of the few instances in which it is proper for the government to intervene (the other is in dealing with externalities).

Posted by: Sean C. Laney | November 14, 2011, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

People saying Ron Paul’s idea is disconnected from the real world? They really should go reality check on their own. They are the people who are saying more regulations on the market! What a foolish statement! The mega corporations who in bed with government are the one who favor regulations due to the fact they are exempted. Therefore, market regulations not only won’t work for the elites but becoming elites’ perfect tool to knock down competitions; regulations is nothing more than monopolizing the market. Since most of small and middle size businesses don’t have the power or the influences to government, they are the one who hurt the most from market regulations, and they happened to be the real job creator.
How does GE not paying any corporate tax for consecutive three years while rest of competitors don’t? Don’t we have the regulations? Sorry! These mega corporations are stepped ABOVE regulations/Law.
That is the REAL reality! To cut this corrupted, you should put the regulations on the government, not on the market! And the best way to do so is to grant people/consumer more power (free market) instead of government.

Posted by: admiralwei | November 18, 2011, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.