Senate Democrats Move to the Next Piece of the Jobs Bill, With a Different Way to Pay
After two pieces of their jobs bill failed in the Senate because Republicans unanimously opposed offsetting their cost with a tax on millionaires, Senate Democrats have picked another piece of the jobs bill without including such a tax.
Next week, Senate Democrats said, they will vote on the “Vow to Hire Heroes Act of 2011,” which would provide incentives to employers for making the hiring of veterans a priority.
The bill would be added as an amendment to a bill that the House of Representatives passed last week — the 3 percent withholding bill. That House-passed bill would repeal the imposition of 3 percent withholding on certain payments made to vendors by government entities such as federal government contractors.
The Vow to Hire Heroes Act of 2011, rather than being paid for by a controversial surtax on Americans making more than $1 million a year as the other two failed bills would have, would be covered by existing funding mechanisms within the Department of Veterans Affairs. Democrats say that such a technique has been used by previous Congresses.
“We expect it to pass,” Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said today on a conference call with reporters. “It should pass, given the history of this and the bipartisan support in the House.”
The measure would provide a tax credit to companies of up to $5,600 for hiring veterans who have been looking for a job for more than six months and a $2,400 credit for veterans who have been unemployed for more than four weeks but less than six months. If a company hires a veteran with service-connected disabilities who has been looking for a job for more than six months, the company could receive up to a tax credit of $9,600.
Additionally, the legislation would ensure that all outgoing veterans receive the job training skills they need to find a job and transfer into civilian society. A Transition Assistance Program, a workshop, would be mandatory for service members moving from service to civilian life -providing help with resume writing and career counseling.
The measure would also help older veterans of past wars by providing 100,000 unemployed veterans up to a year of additional GI benefits that could be used on expanded education or training programs.
”There are 14 million veterans who are out there trying to find work every day and it’s time that we can do something for them,” Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said today. “Veterans are not a partisan issue. They are something we can all get behind.”
Democrats believe the bill stands a much better chance of passing in the Senate, likely because of the change in the way the bill is paid for. But with Veteran’s Day coming up, the Democrats also may be keying into the symbolism of a vote so close to the holiday.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
If the vet doesn’t work out, will the business have to give back the $4K incentive?
Posted by: newcountryman | November 4, 2011, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
It might work since the Democrats are not insisting on more tax revenue. Question: If the vet doesn’t work out, will the business have to give back the incentive?
Posted by: newcountryman | November 4, 2011, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
I would wonder about the accuracy of 14 million Vets out there looking for work. As a disabled vet I did not disclose my disability (other than the disabled veteran document that HR is not allowed to share with the interviewees) to my current employer until after the start of the job less they consider that in the job offer. So I am not sure that unless they were desiring to hire a wounded warrior that that incentive would be worth the job seeker advertising.
Posted by: John | November 4, 2011, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Veterans entering the civilian work force are faced with the same lack of jobs faced by all those who are looking for jobs. Correcting for age and work experience unimployment rates for veterans is not significantly different than non-veterans of the same age and work experience.
Posted by: Common _ Sense | November 4, 2011, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
As a vet that graduated from college in 1978, I faced the same opportunities, or lack of, that non-vets did. Although it’s appropriate for vets to get focused consideration, now-a-days it appears more and more like they are being used as pawns for some self-serving politician.
Posted by: newcountryman | November 5, 2011, 7:14 am 7:14 am
“And in October alone, roughly 13.9 million Americans remained unemployed, 42% of whom had been out of work for 27 weeks or longer.” This is according CNN Money watch.
Sen.Patty Murray(democrat) says there are 14 million veterans unemployed, so according to her every one is a veteran, or is it that democrats just throw out number because they can.
Posted by: Lizzie | November 5, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am
If you want more American jobs, quit buying products not made in America.
It’s really that simple.
No law is needed. No jobs bill is necessary.
American consumers hold the power to restore American jobs.
Posted by: Joe White | November 6, 2011, 1:07 am 1:07 am
“And in October alone, roughly 13.9 million Americans remained unemployed, 42% of whom had been out of work for 27 weeks or longer.” This is according CNN Money watch.
Sen.Patty Murray(democrat) says there are 14 million veterans unemployed, so according to her every one is a veteran, or is it that democrats just throw out number because they can. Posted by: Lizzie | November 5, 2011, 11:22 am.
LOL! Those are the only two choices, Lizzie? Either everyone is a veteran or the Democrats are making stuff up? Never occurred to you that this could be an honest mistake, or a misprint? That maybe she meant 1.4 million, not 14 million? Or that maybe she meant the veterans unemployment RATE is 14%, higher than the national average? Why do you automatically assume the very worst, most damning reason you can think up when you see a discrepancy like this, from a Democrat? And I’ll bet you’re one of those people crying about how divided and partisan we have become as a nation………….
Posted by: Searambler | November 6, 2011, 10:59 am 10:59 am
This is more money going to Obama contributors. All the money is used to buy Obama votes. The administration cannot truthfully connect and money spent that actually helped anyone other than his buddies. Whatever the cute name we should not spend any more money.
Posted by: charles | November 13, 2011, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm