Supercommittee Republicans Offer ‘Backup’ Plan, Democrats Reject the Offer
Around the Capitol this afternoon, it certainly feels like the Friday before a deadline.
Late today, Republicans on the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, along with Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, offered a “last-ditch, “plan B” proposal to Democrats, in case the negotiators on the so-called “supercommittee” fail to reach their target.
A Republican aide said the plan was “designed to be the lowest of the low-hanging fruit, stuff that everyone agrees on,” so that if supercommittee members fail to reach the big agreement at least there will be something left to salvage.
The Republican plan, as offered late today to Democrats, is well below the mandated $1.2 trillion cuts the committee is supposed to come up with.
The plan calls for $643 billion in cuts over the next decade, including $229 billion in additional revenues and $316 billion in spending cuts. The plan does not touch Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid. To entice Democrats further, the Republican plan closes the corporate jet tax loophole.
Republican aides said the plan draws directly from former debt groups like Simpson/Bowles and Rivlin/Domenici. Aides stressed that even while they were offering the contingency plan, Republicans still continued to search for a way forward to achieve $1.2 trillion or more in deficit reduction, but this offer should serve as a back-up plan.
But Democrats were not buying it, and immediately rejected the Republican proposal today.
“From what I’ve heard, it does not meet, even close to coming to meet, the issues that we set out from the beginning: fair and balanced,” a visibly frustrated Sen. Patty Murray, Democratic co-chairwoman of the supercommittee, said today. “The wealthiest among us need to participate and we are still waiting for a revenue plan from the Republicans that meets that test.”
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., essentially mocked the Republican offer, noting that it falls far short of the primary goal of the committee.
“We were sent here to do $1.2 trillion or $1.5 trillion or $4 trillion, so the idea on Friday of settling for half of what the American people need, what we were sent here to do, is unacceptable to me,” Kerry said, leaving a private meeting this afternoon. “I think the American people, on its face, can tell that that does not meet any standard of fairness, any standard of common sense.”
Both Murray and Kerry, two of the most outspoken Democrats on the supercommittee with a large role in the negotiations, seemed visibly frustrated, exhausted and unsure now of the way forward.
“This is the divide right now and we’re still working,” said Kerry, “I hope we can get there, but I don’t know.”
With nearly all members of Congress home now for the Thanksgiving holiday, the members of the supercommittee will continue working through the weekend in order to get a deal by next week. While the deadline for a deal is Wednesday, the group knows it needs to get a proposal to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office by Monday, at the latest, to be scored and voted on in time.
Leaving Capitol Hill tonight, one Republican on the exclusive panel expressed uncertainty on the path ahead.
“I don’t have as much hope as I did last week, but we talked again today,” said Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz. “You know, deadlines have a way of focusing your attention, so … we’re going to keep talking.”
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Why would any proposal NOT include Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. As Obama, God himself said, the drivers of our national debt crisis are Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. I guess commonsense is really uncommon. Time to elect people who actually care whether or not the Repubic will be around in 100 years.
Posted by: s | November 18, 2011, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
More proof that the Dems don’t WANT to work with the Republicans. They talk of compromise, but want the Republicans to bow to their orders. They want to scare the elderly by saying the Republicans will cut SS and Medicare, when Obamacare will place deep cuts on it, discourage doctors from repeat appointments with the elderly, and will cut back on doctor’s payments so much they won’t take Medicare patients. And the press covers it up….
Obama said he wants jobs, yet he delayed drilling in Ohio that will create up to 200,000 jobs. How many jobs were his “green” payback stimulus jobs supposed to create? 80% of the money to green companies went to Obama supporters.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | November 18, 2011, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
It appear it is now the Democrats turn to be stubborn and not back down on compromise. How does it feel, tea party lobbyists?
Posted by: Wayne | November 18, 2011, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Just who is the party of NO!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | November 18, 2011, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
From what I read…the republicans are sticking the Bush tax cuts in the plan to be made permanent. This is a deal breaker and bad for the economy. A comment for “S” ….why is the social security even being brought into any negotiations. It is fine until 2026 and should not be a part of any fiscal plan now or in the next year or two. The republicans want to privitize it and this the dems. will never agree to. Also..Medicare and medicaid need to be addressed individually not as a part for a hostage situation which is what the republicans have been doing for the last two years. If you want to get serious there are deficits to be made in the budget for military spending and one thing which could save a great deal for this country would be if the congress and the senate give back their free health care. The people who are asked to give up things are paying for it and their own families so to do this would be helping in two ways. It is an idea as serious as t hose who thing soc. sec. should be part of it.
Posted by: talmag | November 18, 2011, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
And so, as it burns Congress fidels away….. Nero
Posted by: Nick | November 18, 2011, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Let em fail at smoke and mirrors…. at least defense spending will be cut a little bit.. that’s a start.
Posted by: Genghas | November 19, 2011, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Genghas, you clearly have no idea how military funding is already hurting.
As we continue pulling out of the wars, we’re getting hit hard on money.
Of course, it would help if funding could be spent more wisely by individual commanders and not mandatorily allocated for a specific item. Government funding leads to a lot of:
“here’s $5,000. Buy paper shredders with it.”
“I can buy a pair of good shredders for $400, can I buy them and then spend the rest on equipment i need?”
“No, you can buy shredders with it.”
So what happens? You spend $5000 on 2-3 paper shredders, rather than 1/10th the price.
If you can fix that problem of government funding, it would do miracles to our money situation. The government knows how to spend money, it just doesn’t know how to spend money using at least half a brain.
Posted by: Reb | November 19, 2011, 12:54 am 12:54 am
I’m voting for anyone willing to stand up and slash entitlement spending. Not with a scalpel, but with an ax. We can’t afford it, never could, never will.
Posted by: Conservative 2012 | November 19, 2011, 7:48 am 7:48 am
The democrats have only one solution, which to increase taxes. How creative. Now wonder trust in the democrats is so low.
Posted by: jonny | November 19, 2011, 8:27 am 8:27 am
“The plan calls for $643 billion in cuts over the next decade, including $229 billion in additional revenues and $316 billion in spending cuts.”
The math is way off here. Does the plan call for $64 billion a year in cuts, or does it call for $31 billion a year in cuts? And why do they put that $23 billion a year in additional revenue in the same sentence as the TWO different spending cut amounts? Whoever wrote this needs to go back to writing school…………..
Posted by: Searambler | November 19, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am
The republicans, especially John Boehner, are trying to get around the triggered cuts. Wright Patterson AFB is in his district. If there are more layoffs at Wright Patterson, his chance for re-election is nil.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 19, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am
The republicans, especially John Boehner, are trying to get around the triggered cuts. Wright Patterson AFB is in his district. If there are more layoffs at Wright Patterson, his chance for re-election is nil.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 19, 2011, 11:59 am.
Which is why we will see these ‘trigger cuts’ blocked by the Republican Party.
Posted by: Searambler | November 19, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm