Matthew Dowd

By Matthew Dowd

Nov 5, 2011 7:30pm

Tribal Politics: America Today

Does the truth really matter any more in our republic?  Is the search for truth just another martyr on the battlefield of today’s polarized political discourse?  The latest news about the allegations of sexual harassment against Herman Cain is very telling.  Not in its impact on the presidential campaign, but on the question of what our political culture has become. Have we devolved into a tribal society?

Let’s review.  The news breaks in Politico that Herman Cain’s former employer, the National Restaurant Association, agreed to a settlement with some female employees following charges they made of sexual harassment.  Those facts now are not in dispute.  But the first course of action by  the tribe of conservatigentsia:  Attack Politico and question their motives.   Then the leaders of this tribe (Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, etc.) attacked the liberal left for daring to raise these issues.  (I guess they forgot that they castigated Bill Clinton unmercifully at times based on very limited information.)

Next, the tribe of liberalagentsia (led by commentators on MSNBC) launched a full-on assault on Cain, attempting to totally disqualify him as a credible candidate.   And anyone defending Cain was dismissed out of hand.

Does the truth matter in this?  Do the women who have been thrown in the middle of this have any say?   Does Cain’s behavior both years ago at the National Restaurant Association and in how he handles the situation today give us an indication of his leadership?  All of these are valid questions, but it’s hard to ever get a measured discussion on it in the midst of this tribal warfare.

Why wasn’t Cain better prepared to answer these allegations and why didn’t he take some accountability for his own behavior?  I can only speculate that it comes from a bit of arrogance, and a feeling that candidates don’t feel they can admit a mistake without looking weak.  (The ironic thing is that the American public actually sees admitting mistakes is a sign of strength and a willingness to learn and improve. )

But the tribal nature of our political culture does not allow this type of nuanced discussion.  The leaders of each of these political tribes has a knee-jerk response to every move or moment today.  If President Obama is for it, conservatives are against it.  If Obama was successful (Libya, Iraq, etc.), then it must have been a bad idea.  If the Republicans want to reform our entitlement programs, then they are heartless.

Do people really care about the women who might have actually been harassed in this or felt their jobs were in jeopardy because of the possible actions of their boss?  Or are they merely pawns in this conflict used or abused by either side to serve an end?  Do conservatives or liberals really care about Herman Cain’s wife in this and how this might affect her?

And so we arrive at this Cain moment in this political battlefield.  And as predictable as the Shiites attacking Sunnis, and Sunnis attacking Shiites, the tribes in our culture rise up and attack each other without much regard to the collateral damage that is done to the civilians in the village.   And the most innocent victim in all of this is a genuine and passionate search for the truth.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Great piece Mr. Dowd.

Posted by: green.goddess | November 5, 2011, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

You only failed to mention the media’s major role in leading the charge, rather than engaging in that “genuine and passionate search for the truth.”

Posted by: Oliver Shagnasty | November 5, 2011, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Excellent. There is definitely a great need for nuanced discussions.

Speaking of nuance, Oliver, I think it would behoove us to remember the media is a term to describe many thousands of newspapers, stations, etc. made up of tens of thousands individuals. Many of them strive for the truth.

Posted by: E | November 5, 2011, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Why does the media choose to dwell on accusations that cannot be substantiated, in any way?

That’s not news, nor is it journalism. It IS character assassination.

I have nothing against hearing truth, but I am opposed to the media making a story from nothing, and then hounding a person, without a shred of real evidence.

If the media wants to discuss this issue further……then produce some real evidence, FIRST!

The people of this country are tired of the media’s propensity to sensationalize, everything, even things where there is absolutely no evidence or basis for the story.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | November 5, 2011, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Speaking of names, E (if you don’t object to the familiarity), what’s of primary concern is the ill behooving of those “journalists” who have forgotten the meaning of “reporter,” i.e. “A person who reports, esp. one employed to report news…”

For example, the above is an “opinion piece.” Fair enough, but far too often writing more slanted finds its way into the so-called hard new of Reuters, AP, and yes, ABC.

Posted by: Oliver Shagnasty | November 5, 2011, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

No. I don’t object to someone calling me by my name. If I did I probably shouldn’t be on a comment board, right? :) Sure, many examples of reporting with a slant can be found. I don’t quite see how that has anything to do with a generalization of the media. Maybe we are having two different conversations.

Posted by: E | November 6, 2011, 12:14 am 12:14 am

As a Native American, I believe the use of the term Tribal/Tribe is a slam against Native American culture and traditions. You could’ve very easily selected another term – such as group, liberal, conservative, Republican, Democrat, etc., because you’re talking about politics. The negative connotations used with the term casts a bad light/image on a Native American unit – one of family, unity, protection, pride.

Please change the term tribe for something more fitting for dominant society.

Posted by: Wesley Westphal | November 6, 2011, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Yes lets ignore the fact that godfather pizza sales took a nosedive after he took over and never fully recovered, or that he flip flops in the same sentence, or how he will lie/rewrite history- cowardly call onto support of advisers to answer a simple question. Speaking of which he just met with the think tank AEI, the same people that brought the Bush Iraq war plan that even obama is sticking too, they love bailouts too. Forget he worked as a insider at the federal reserve and until confronted with any information about them thought they did a dandy job. He is a crook too- did not pay his taxes, the 999 plan by the way is a shelved plan from the 90′s. As if anything under consideration in the 90′s is appropriate for now.

He is a glass cannon and the spotlight is gonna cause him to overheat and shatter, since he is the last puppet the establishment has to throw at us to make us think we have a choice for our future policy with Obama, Romney or Cain- they are collectively giving him a softball to distract from the real issues. Shame on the media!

Posted by: EgadsNo | November 6, 2011, 7:11 am 7:11 am

westley westphal, tribalism isn’t exclusive to north america.

Posted by: grumpopolis | November 6, 2011, 7:33 am 7:33 am

Any time Americans elect a president or have key House and Senate leaders who are at the extreme edge of the left or right we all pay the price. Obama, Pelosi and Reid are extreme left in their ideology. We would fair no better if we elect Tea Party extremists. When you are that far out from center only problems can follow, the gap is too great for compromise and the majority of Americans, who lean toward the middle, can not be served.

Posted by: ray | November 6, 2011, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Ray, could you be specific in what actions President Obama has taken that you describe as extreme?

Posted by: e | November 6, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Obama, Pelosi and Reid are extreme left in their ideology. Posted by: ray | November 6, 2011, 9:23 am.

Wrong. Obama is not extreme Left (Neither are the other two). He is much more moderate and center than the Right claims, but that’s because the Right has moved so much further TO the Right recently that they have actually moved the center itself slightly to the Right. If you objectively look at Obama’s policies and statements you will see this is true.

Posted by: Searambler | November 6, 2011, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Many tribal nations here in America practiced government by consensus. Using “tribal” in this manner demeans America’s First Nations and is a failed adjective.

Posted by: Jared Hautamaki | November 6, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.