Boy, 8, Tells Bachmann His Gay Mommy Doesn’t Need to Be ‘Fixed’

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
An 8-year-old boy confronted GOP contender Michele Bachmann at a book-signing event in South Carolina, and stood up for his gay mother.
Rep. Bachmann, who supports a Constitutional amendment defining marriage between a man and a woman, initially coaxed the seemingly shy child to speak during the weekend event, only to be left virtually speechless when the boy said his mother was gay.
“My mom is gay and she doesn’t need fixing,” the boy, identified only as Elijah, is heard whispering to Bachmann in a video posted to YouTube.
Bachmann initially says nothing to the boy, but as he walks away she responds: “Ok. Bye-bye.”
According to Chicago Now, a woman who identified herself as the shooter of the clip said the boy’s mother planned to confront Bachmann but got nervous. Elijah insisted they stay at the event to talk to the congresswoman.
“I was standing in line with Elijah and his mom. His mom was going to say something to her, but she got nervous and told me she wanted to leave. We were about to step out of the line but Elijah cried out, ‘Nooo!’ He grabbed onto her coat and pulled her back in the line, saying he wanted to talk to her,” the woman told Chicago Now.
Bachmann was confronted by a high school student at an event in Iowa last week, also asking about gay rights in a video that went viral.
“Why can’t same sex couples get married,” 16-year-old Jane Schmidt asked Bachmann.
“They can get married, [if] they abide by the same laws as everyone else. They can marry a man, if they’re a woman, and can marry a woman if they’re man,” Bachmann responded.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Out of the mouths of babes…………..
Posted by: Searambler | December 6, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Quite frankly does an 8 year old really know whats best for itself?
Posted by: Paulie | December 6, 2011, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Quite frankly does an 8 year old really know whats best for itself?
Posted by: Paulie | December 6, 2011, 4:47 pm.
Definitely better than a politician like Bachmann……..
Posted by: Searambler | December 6, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I think I caught a momentary glimpse of humanity on Bachmann’s face when the boy stated that his mom didn’t need fixing.
The whole idea that someone who is gay needs or can be ‘fixed’ to be straight, flies in the face of science and common sense. If a gay person could change their mind then by the same logic, any straight person could just ‘decide’ to be gay.
Bachmann’s comment to the teen that gays have the right to marry, they just have to marry the opposite sex, is ridiculous. The right is to marry the adult that one loves. I’ve been happily married for 25 years and I can’t imagine anyone telling me that I couldn’t marry the person that I love. Gays should be given that right.
Posted by: Librarian53 | December 6, 2011, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
The mother didn’t have the guts so she sends in her naive 8 year old to do her dirty work. Typical….
Posted by: ginny | December 6, 2011, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
This 8 yr old kid does not know any better. Does he realize that he would not be born to his mother unless she has sperm inserted in her from a man? I don’t think so.
Posted by: Seriously | December 6, 2011, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
You know, I disagree with Bachman’s ultra-right win views. That being said, no 8 year old does this of his own volition. This was obviously a stunt and frankly to use your 8 year old that way is a little despicable no matter how righteous the cause.
Posted by: Squire71 | December 6, 2011, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Way to use your kid for propaganda! It’s sad when parents use their kids to further their own political agenda. The mom didn’t get nervous…this was a setup to gain attention.
Posted by: ufos8mycow | December 6, 2011, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Beaten down by an 8 year old. LOL
Posted by: Jim Bob jr. | December 6, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Librarian53, I couldn’t have said it better! It’s really sad when an 8 year old boy has more compassion and common sense than an airheaded politician-wannabe. For those of you who think the kid’s mom put him up to this, what…Do you think that the kid’s going to have any different of a viewpoint on gay issues, when he becomes older? That he’s somehow going to magically transform into a bigot?
Posted by: Christine | December 6, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
That little boy has a lot to be proud of!
Posted by: Herne | December 6, 2011, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Typical liberals following the advice of 8 year old over an adult. No wonder the country is in so much trouble.
Posted by: Paulie | December 6, 2011, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Christine said Do you think that the kid’s going to have any different of a viewpoint on gay issues, when he becomes older? That he’s somehow going to magically transform into a bigot?
–No just probably a serial killer.
Posted by: jackson | December 6, 2011, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
How adorable is that. He will grow up to be a good man because good men always defend their mothers. Elijah, you rock man. Bachmann and Santorum could learn some decency from this kid.
Posted by: MTATL67 | December 6, 2011, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Paulie wrote: “Quite frankly does an 8 year old really know whats (sic) best for itself?”
An 8-year-old is not an it. Children are not things. They are people.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 6, 2011, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
But it’s okay to give your kids posters of abortions and have them wave at passing cars? Nice Squire74 for clearing all this up about using kids. Dunderhead!
Posted by: Darcy | December 6, 2011, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Just because you don’t think homosexuality is normal does not make you a bigot. Guess what, this is America and I have a right to my opinion too. I think homosexuality is wrong, for a man to put his penus into another man is just not normal, how much clearer does it have to be. I mean think about it, how does that even seem right. Next thing you know we will be expected to accept sex with animals as normal, I mean hey those people have feelings too, right. Geez, this world is going to hell quick with all the sexual perversions we are supposed to accept now.
Posted by: Seriously | December 6, 2011, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
It is shameful for gay activists to exploit and manipulate a 8-year-old to advance their radical homosexual agenda. “Gay marriage” is an oxymoron, since marriage means “a permanent union between one woman and man.”
For 5000 years, “marriage” has meant “a contract between one man and one woman”, not some other random combination of humans because it feels good. That definition of marriage is the bedrock of human society. MB’s response meant that society should not endorse gay marriage by giving it the high status of “marriage”. Ignore the perverted and false “interpretations” of her comments by gay media bloggers. She remains the most principled Constitutional Conservative on the American political stage.
This was a particularly moronic screed on MB’s commonsense response and instruction to clueless gay activist students. The radical left, gay media no longer even pretends to report political news but instead feeds us radical left gay propaganda.
The argument for “gay marriage” is equally valid (and equally invalid) for 1 man-2 women and for 2 women-1 man; etc. The logical extension of allowing “gay marriage” is legalizing polygamy.
Posted by: Derek Wain | December 6, 2011, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
I agree that gay couples should not marry. This is mainly because of my religious beliefs, but also look at biology. We were obviously created as man and woman to be together and reproduce. A woman and another woman cannot reproduce as they were born.
Posted by: Chrissie | December 6, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Chrissie if we only had sex to reproduce we’d only have sex two or three times in our lives. Good luck with that. Most of the things that gay people do, a man and a woman can do, and yet it doesn’t outrage you in that case.
Posted by: Republicanslie | December 6, 2011, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
“For 5000 years, “marriage” has meant “a contract between one man and one woman” ~~~~~~~~ This is incorrect. In SOME places at some times in some cultures in the last 5,000 years marriage was defined this way. It certainly wasn’t the universal definition of marriage by any means. That’s why we have terms like polyandry, polygyny, polygamy, monogamy, etc…to identify the various flavors of marriage contract that exist.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 6, 2011, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
AS SOON AS I SEE THE TERM “RADICAL HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA” I SEE BIGOT.
Posted by: MORRISSEY | December 6, 2011, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Seriously “Just because you don’t think homosexuality is normal does not make you a bigot”
” Next thing you know we will be expected to accept sex with animals as normal,”—-how right you are,the senate just ;lifted the ban on sodomy and beastiality in the military. WH press secretary, Jay Carney takes a question asking what is the president’s opinion on beastiality in the military and the reporter is laughed at and the questioned not answered. America wake up! Rome fell because of the very culture that is currently being embraced, it is just a matter of time that America is no more. Berate Michele Bachman for her values and a morals, however the majority of all major religions are against this behavior. This gay mother shouldn’t put her child up to asking a question beyond his age comprehension, shame on her!.
Posted by: Jo | December 6, 2011, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Thank God we have right wing heterosexuals like Newt Gingrich to preserve the sanctity of marriage.
Posted by: Sally L | December 6, 2011, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“We were obviously created as man and woman to be together and reproduce.” ~~~~~~
Chrissy, reproduction isn’t the only function of marriage. Are you also for preventing heterosexuals who cannot reproduce with their partner (e.g. women who’ve had hysterectomies, men who’ve had vasectomies, etc.) from being allowed to legally marry? If you’d allow heterosexuals who cannot have children with their partner to marry, why would you not allow homosexuals who cannot have children with their partner to marry?
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 6, 2011, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Jo, I believe you are having problems with the idea of adult informed consent.
What two informed consenting adults decide to do with their bodies, or how they decide to give pleasure to one another, is none of your g****m business.
Posted by: Hardy Moore | December 6, 2011, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
“Berate Michele Bachman for her values and a morals” ~~~~~~~~ Love that Freudian slip.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 6, 2011, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Until people stop believing literally in 2,000 year-old books and using them as an excuse to hate others, the hatred is going to continue. Using religion as an excuse for hatred has got to stop.
Posted by: Marie Pearle | December 6, 2011, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
As the mother of two boys I can say that an 8 year old does know what he is talking about. The world today is much different than when we were young. My children are 15 & 11 and they both knew what gay was back in first grade. I was shocked to learn that they knew the meaning at such a young age. My husband and I discussed it with them at an age approiate level and to be respectful of people’s choices. I say the boy should be proud that he stuck up for his mother…
Posted by: Heather | December 6, 2011, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
we all have our beliefs. It is up to the lawmakers to follow the law. If the law says, man and woman…. then so be it. If the law says whoever, then so be it.
the lawmakers should not be swayed by either side, only what the law states.
Posted by: christine | December 6, 2011, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
A human being is a human being period. What does it matter what sex a person is? What does it matter what race, color, height , weight, or whatever. If you don’t agree with it, don’t go to the wedding! The ignorance and disregard for human rights of some people in this day and age is disturbing. There will be a time when people will look back in disgust at everyone who was against anyone’s right to marry there soulmate, just as we look back in disgust that women didn’t have the right to vote and slavery and many many other ugly things in our past. For those of you that think a child is stupid and their opinions don’t matter , let me tell you could be more wrong. That is the kind of ignorance that plagues this world, your are the problem.
Posted by: anthony | December 6, 2011, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Bachmann would be better off living in exile in Saudi Arabia or Uganda where her kind of bigot thrives.
Posted by: palace | December 6, 2011, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Shame on the mother of that 8 year old, using him in that manner! I don’t care what your view point is… you don’t use a child as a pawn!!
Posted by: Kathy | December 6, 2011, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Christine, you seem to be having a problem with the concept of lawMAKERS.
The law is whatever the lawmakers MAKE it.
Posted by: Hardy Moore | December 6, 2011, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
I wonder how many of the people objecting to the “using” of this eight year old child, also objected to Palin parading her sprogs, and sprogs of sprogs.
Posted by: callmeahab | December 6, 2011, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
As a heterosexual male I must say I am rather less concerned about the idea of two men having sex than I am about the idea of Michelle Bachmann having sex.
Posted by: Interesting | December 6, 2011, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Douglas … repeat after me, “minority” does not mean “abnormal”. It really is not terribly difficult. Who knows what minorities you will go after next?
Posted by: Monormo | December 6, 2011, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Seriously and Derek, your claim that gay marriage will lead to beastiality and polygamy is a fallacy, specifically the slippery slope fallacy. Please come back with a valid argument against gay marriage if you can think of one.
Posted by: Jigglypuff | December 6, 2011, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“Democrats have turned funerals into political conventions.”
The Westboro Christian lunatics are democrats now? Ha ha ha.
Posted by: Loki | December 6, 2011, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Yeah tell that to a woman who has 38 foster children. Obviously something is seriously wrong with our moms otherwise we would not have so many neglected homes. Married women are treated so poorly by our fellow citizens they don’t have a chance to enjoy their lot in life. Prostitutes ready to provide an affair, gay sex, no fault divorce and everyone just gets creepier and creepier. Just love this liberal leadership. Everyone just gets creepier.
Posted by: Mystery | December 6, 2011, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
what a wonderful little boy! his mom should be proud of him!
Posted by: justsane | December 6, 2011, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Wow …her and her husband have taken care of 23 foster children in their life. How many foster children have any one gay couple had?
Posted by: whining liberal | December 6, 2011, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
@Whining Liberal, check out the documentary We Are Dad, about two gay men who are foster fathers to a bunch of kids.
Posted by: Larry-bob | December 6, 2011, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
That a boy, Elijah! Tell it like it is dude! The religious loons need fixing. There is nothing wrong with your mommy.
Posted by: hereticzero | December 6, 2011, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Mystery, I hate it when prostitutes riddle my family as well. But seriously, what the heck are you talking about? Please form complete, coherent thoughts in your sentences. It is difficult to understand you when you use a stream of consciousness approach in your writing.
Posted by: Jigglypuff | December 6, 2011, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Thank God we have people like the Kim Kardashian who work hard to preserve the sanctity of marriage.
Posted by: SimpleObserver | December 6, 2011, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
All you ignorant people, stop hating on Michelle Bachmann!! She addresses that every human being have the same rights, regardless of thier sexual orientation or personal preferences. Homosexuality is shunned in the Bible, and being a Christian, I stand by those beliefs that every Christian should recognize completely also. Homosexuals should still be respected as any other person would be however homosexuality does not have to be accepted. And for young kids speaking out about these issues, please close your mouths. You have no idea what you are talking about and words are just getting fed to you. There are already enough older ridiculously-minded role models that are making fools of themselves for you..
Posted by: RCRECE1 | December 6, 2011, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
The party of less government is wanting to legislate moral behavior between consenting adults. We’ll be hiring moral police to peek in bedroom windows. Oops, more government spending. Michelle, you take care of your own moral improvement program and let everyone else take care of theirs. In other words MYOB.
Posted by: howdymo1 | December 6, 2011, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
JigglyPuff: No argument would be good enough for you because you are obviously confused if you think a woman should marry a woman or a man should marry a man. Biology 101 would be my answer and if you don’t get that well I cannot help you. It is very basic and nature driven, you can take God and religion out of the equation if you want.
Posted by: Seriously | December 6, 2011, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
“Why can’t same sex couples get married?”
“Because God said NO!”
Yep..that’s how that conversation would have went with me.
Posted by: Mrs. Field | December 6, 2011, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Gotta love how the religious right has no problem cherry-picking science (or more accurately pseudo-science) to back up their hate filled rhetoric.
Posted by: Kevin | December 6, 2011, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
No country needs a religious freak leading them. Faith is a brave quality, but forcing your own beliefs on another person is cultish and backward. I suppose I don’t have to repeat the “This Is America” mantra. It’s what gives us the freedom to discuss non-issues such as these. Bring on the election so I never have to hear the name ‘Bachmann’, again.
Posted by: Roddy | December 6, 2011, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Instead of instigating 8 year old about confronting, her mom should focus on his study and moral and behavior. There are many miseries in the world and much more painfull and dier than homo sexual people feel. People die without food in many countries and some folks worry about their marriage right. Terrorisim has taken people in many countries their basic right – RIGTH TO LIVE A LIFE GOD HAS GIVEN THEM. Nobody shed tears for them and these media in US is just promoting such useless story.
Posted by: prepcr | December 6, 2011, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
SERIOUSLY: “No argument would be good enough for you because you are obviously confused if you think a woman should marry a woman or a man should marry a man. Biology 101 would be my answer and if you don’t get that well I cannot help you.” – - – It looks to me like you are the one who needs to take biology 101 so you can learn that marriage is not a prerequisite for a woman to get pregnant. Women can get pregnant even if they are not married, AND a man other than their husband can get them pregnant. Marriage is NOT necessary for procreation.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 6, 2011, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Seriously you all are a piece of work…The mother was scared and didn’t want to confront Bachmann.Not once when I read this whole thing did I see the mom force or get her son to do it. You all must think that he was pushed, kids do things on their own without any coaxing from adults. Get real and grow up, seriously!!!!!! On a second note Bachmann is an idiot and hmmm so do all of you.
Posted by: Simone | December 6, 2011, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
rcrece1, Homosexuals don’t get to govern Christian behavior or rights, and Christians have no business trying to govern homosexual behavior or rights. It’s really that simple.
Posted by: anotherview | December 6, 2011, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
PREPCR: “Instead of instigating 8 year old about confronting, her mom should focus on his study and moral and behavior.” – - – Clearly someone has a significant reading comprehension problem. The mother DID NOT instigate the 8 year old’s confrontation with anyone. Speaking to Bachman was HIS idea AFTER his mother changed her mind. HE CHOSE to instigate speaking to Bachman. Learn to friggin read.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 6, 2011, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
“RIGHT TO LIVE A LIFE GOD HAS GIVEN THEM.” Which gay people have too. Or would if people who interpreted Gd’s word for their own ends did not try to deny them this right. Yes, you are right there is terrorism elsewhere. That doesn’t mean we should consider blighting the lives of minorities in the US okay.
Posted by: Floretta | December 6, 2011, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Mrs Field, so your tooth fairy told you gay people are wrong?
That’s how that conversation would have gone with me.
Posted by: Duoscool | December 6, 2011, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
MRS. FIELD: ““Why can’t same sex couples get married?” “Because God said NO!” – - – Please site or even quote the specific passage of scripture in which GOD explicity says NO to same sex marriage. Accoriding to my concordance there is no such passage in which GOD (as in not someone else but GOD is quoted) explicity and literally says no to same sex marriage. From what I can tell from every passage that uses some version of the word marriage that conclusion is merely an interpretation that must necessarily deviate from the literal language.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 6, 2011, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
I find it interesting that most of the comments are about how the mother coerced the boy to talk to Michele Bachmann, yet the article clearly states that it was the boy who insisted they stay to talk to Bachmann. Also, I don’t find you people messaging the Westboro Baptist Church for including children in their protests.
Posted by: AM | December 6, 2011, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
SERIOUSLY: “It is very basic and nature driven, you can take God and religion out of the equation if you want.” – - – That is correct. Sexual orientation is nature driven and NOT chosen. Homosexuality is simply a naturaly variation of complex human DNA and physiology.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 6, 2011, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Most gay people would be shocked at the kind of things straight people do behind closed doors. Just use your imagination.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | December 6, 2011, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
DCFS should take that child out of that home. That mother should be ashamed. This was a setup and MB handled it correctly. To use a child like that is criminal. And if gays kept there life private there would not be these problems. But it is their constant striving for attention that people hate. Please stop defending saying homosexuals are normal, they are sexual deviants and usually carry enormous mental issues. Also what do gay guys talk gay, is that part heredity too!
Posted by: Mike | December 6, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
to simple observer – while homosexuality is shunned in the bible, which indicates you should shun it, slavery and multiple wives was permitted. DOes that mean you should own slaves and have multiple spouses??
Posted by: vpete | December 6, 2011, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
You guys can’t keep having it both ways. If you “good Christians” honestly believe that the Bible is a guide for our times without need for context, interpretation, or 2000 years of historical perspective and learning about the world than you’re going to have a pretty miserable Easter Brunch without that big pork roast and 4th of July isn’t going to be quite the same minus the lobster. Oh, and you -are- prepared to marry your sister-in-law should your brother die, right?
Posted by: Former Republican | December 6, 2011, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
I’m pro-civil union. I just don’t want to use 8 year olds to make my point. And anyone who doesn’t think this was staged is naive. I don’t care what the heck Sarah Palin and her room temp I.Q. did. I prefer to hold my side of a debate to a higher standard. Using the “other side is doing it” argument is weak.
Posted by: Squire71 | December 6, 2011, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
FormerRepublican: You really should not talk about things you know nothing about. You are referring to things in the Old Testament before Christ. Seriously do some reading because you need to understand the Bible more and I don’t feel like having to educate you. And marry your sister-in-law or brother die’s, you must like reading things out of context so you can twist them. Good try and I guess if someone does not know any better they will listen to the uneducated bunk you spew.
Posted by: Seriously | December 6, 2011, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
This is awesome! Bachmann is a nutjob, obviously, and to see her schooled by an 8-year-old says it all.
Posted by: JeffreyRO5 | December 6, 2011, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
The radical homosexual movement is so FULL OF BIGOTRY . It reeks that they are so sick in pushing a child to make statements like this.
Posted by: Rik Alen | December 6, 2011, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Rik Alen, sure, and black is white.
Posted by: Interesting | December 6, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
I’m always fascinated by these anti-gay people who say that they could CHOOSE to be gay.
Very revealing.
Posted by: ululation | December 6, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Well, as for gay marriage, God told ME last night that it’s okay with him.
Posted by: trubeliever | December 6, 2011, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Okay, the state, from this point forward, should only recognize civil unions, grandfathering everyone who was ‘married’ prior to this pont. Then, if you also want a religous sanctioned marriage, go ahead and find a clergy person to marry you. Then ‘marriage’ would be left to be defined by each religion. The state could easily approve clergy being allowed to celebrate civil unions at the same time they do the religious ceremony. This is the only fair way to do it. If people like Bachmann insist on saying marriage is defined by God, and the U.S. constitution says no particular religion is recognized as the state religion, I don’t think the U.S. can actually use any religion’s view of what the institution should look like. The state has an obligation to protect its citizens from force ‘marriage’ and of course children,but beyond that, the state should stay out of it. Civil unions for everyone.
Posted by: Catherine | December 6, 2011, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
I’ve an idea, Seriously. Don’t use the straw-man rhetorical argument when you’re only going to stumble over it. First – you can check out Deut. 25:5-6 for a discussion of Levirate Marriage, which you claim to know not of. And if you’re stuck on the Old Covenant / New Covenant argument you’ll likely fail there as well if you take a more enlightened reading of Paul and throw some CONTEXT on the homosexual people (greek orgy and pedophilia — about as far removed from the topic as you can get) and he would have encountered 2000 years ago vs. the committed couples of modern times. How much you want to wager that an appropriate reading would show that ancient Jewish prejudice carried over into Paul. Gee, I do know what I’m talking about – we just disagree on the interpretation.
Posted by: Former Republican | December 6, 2011, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
“FormerRepublican: You really should not talk about things you know nothing about. You are referring to things in the Old Testament before Christ.” sayeth Seriously ~~~~~~~~ And the quote most often used to justify homosexuality as wrong and an abomination is in what part of the Bible, Seriously??? . . .that would be the Old Testament! So are things like the Ten Commandments, the Genesis/Creation story, the Fall of Eve and all kinds of things that Christians believe and find vital to their dogma. In fact, if the OT could be discounted as not important and/or wrong, then the Temptation and the Fall of Man didn’t happen, and Jesus had no need to show up and do his Sacrifice to Save Humanity thingy. You only want to leave out the parts that are inconvenient for you and make you look foolish…like all the stuff Former Republican pointed out.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 6, 2011, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Seriously, granted I haven’t reread the Bible in a while, but if you are saying the Old Testament doesn’t count, and only the New Testament does, I don’t think there are any references to gays in it. In searching the net, I can’t find any references within the New Testament against gays. Do you know of any?
I think the entire gay marriage controversy centers around a lot of confusion. Some folks are confused about gays, thinking they have chosen to be gay, rather than the scientific and common sense view that they are born that way. They can’t stop being attracted to the same sex in the same way that a straight person can’t change being attracted to the opposite sex. Understanding that they can’t change their attraction, why shouldn’t they be allowed to marry the adult they are in love with? Just like straight people can.
Posted by: Librarian53 | December 6, 2011, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Catherine, I don’t think being civil unioned has quite the same ring to it as being married!
And why is marriage only defined by God because Bachmann or some other religious fanatic says so?
In my opinion, marriage should be between two consenting adults, period. It should represent the legal, practical and romantic joining of two lives. If some churches don’t allow it, fine, they are a private club and can make their rules. But as a private club making their own rules, they should be paying taxes.
Posted by: Librarian53 | December 6, 2011, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
“Homosexuality is shunned in the Bible, and being a Christian, I stand by those beliefs that every Christian should recognize completely also. Homosexuals should still be respected as any other person would be however homosexuality does not have to be accepted” ~~~~~~~~~ So, why should everybody ELSE recognize what you and your fellow religionists shun and codify those things YOUR in-group shuns into laws binding on everybody? Seventh Day Adventists shun the eating of meat and stand by those beliefs. The eating of meat doesn’t have to be accepted. Are you for implementing a law that prohibits all the rest of us from eating meat? Do the 7DA get to tell you you’re not allowed to eat meat because they shun the practice? Jehovah’s Witnesses shun blood transfusions and cite their interpretation of their holy book to justify it. Should we all be forced by law to be unable to get transfusions just because THEY find them against their religious beliefs? The problem here isn’t what your religious group likes or doesn’t like. It’s your attempt to legislate your preferences onto the rest of the country, as if we all are somehow mandated to stay within the boundaries your religious group chooses.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 6, 2011, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Liberals are just children who haven’t grown up yet….which explains this 8 year old
Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2011, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Librarian53 – you asked if there are any references in the New Testament regarding homosexuality. Just read Romans 1. It discusses women exchanging natural relations that are contrary to nature and the men likewise exchanging relations with woman and were consumed with passion for one another-men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. So, what is the due penalty for their error? People claim that gays can be determined scientifically yet there is no study that lines up 100 people claiming to be gay, straight, and bi in which the study can determine the outcome. The truth is is that everyone is prone to sexual deviance because our bodies are sin so we must flee to what is Godly and this is called repentance.
Posted by: BT | December 6, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
“Why can’t same sex couples get married?”
“Because ***some unknown guy from several thousand years ago who wrote some lines he claimed to be the words of a God*** said NO!”
Yep..that’s how that conversation would have went with me.”
Fixed that for you, Mrs. Field.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 6, 2011, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Christians, if you do not like homosexuality the solution is simple.
Don’t have sex with your own gender.
Otherwise, butt out.
Posted by: Ronda Lee | December 6, 2011, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
BT, but some of us aren’t prepared to argue on the grounds of your fairytale. Islam says Christians are fools. See how that works?
Posted by: Sally L | December 6, 2011, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Even an 8 year old understands that it is wrong for others to judge and want to deny another American’s way of life and liberty to choose. Bachmann and her husband are ignorant and unintelligent people. The eight old probably sticks-up for his mother a lot and gets picked on for having a gay mom because some American’s are ignorant and blind due to their religious beliefs and lack tolerance for those that disagree or believe differently.
Posted by: juscause | December 7, 2011, 12:03 am 12:03 am
I sometimes wonder how the marriages of Christian bigots work.
A good loving relationship is about more than sex, which takes up what … a couple of hours a week?
All the rest of the time when you are not having sex you are doing all the other things that are part of a loving relationship.
And yet conservative straights look at gays and ALL THEY SEE is the sex.
Maybe I’m wrong.
Maybe Christians have sex 12 hours a day, which would explain the emphasis.
Posted by: Night Owl | December 7, 2011, 12:11 am 12:11 am
“I don’t believe in the Bible, so why should it control my sexuality?”
“Yes, but the Bible says ….”
Give me a break.
Posted by: kittyhawk | December 7, 2011, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Enough promoting homo sexuality. Homo sexual people shouldn’t be discriminated and should be respected but their behavior is not acceptable. It is very odd. Increasingly with media’s support, homo sexual peoples are becoming radical. You are really concerned about human right just because you don’t have right to get married. How about human rights abuse of women in muslim countries. People die in third world countries because of lack of food. non-hygine living conditions. If you are really worried about human rights go live in those countries and spread the message. Try saying about woman’s right in Pakistan, you won’t becuase you would get killed. And you are worried about your marriage rights. More than 40% of marriages in US end up in divorce. Fix that first then talk about other rights. Stop selfish readical behavior.
Posted by: prepcr | December 7, 2011, 12:15 am 12:15 am
preppcr, to me YOUR behavior is not acceptable. Funny how that works. And your message seems to be that because we are not Pakistan gay people should have no rights. Logic much?
Posted by: teapublicanus | December 7, 2011, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Bachmann you are a uneducated ignorant American, your death will be the cherry on my cake! I just hope I get to be the emt responder to your side and allow you to die because your religion violates mine!
Posted by: Thomas Alex | December 7, 2011, 1:35 am 1:35 am
BT, seriously, that is really sad if you believe ‘our bodies are sin’.
I find it easier to believe that God gave us bodies temporarily to enjoy our senses with and do good works for our families and others. I believe in God but not the wrathful, vengeful, wanting to be worshiped all the time, my way or the highway kind that too many religions Him/Her to be portray. But just as I don’t try to declare my beliefs about God should be followed by everyone else, others shouldn’t demand that theirs are the only correct one.
So why shouldn’t gay people be allowed to marry the one that they love, just as straight people can, if the only reason is some people’s religious beliefs. Our country is famous for religious freedom, after all.
Posted by: Librarian53 | December 7, 2011, 2:31 am 2:31 am
What does an 8 year old know about what ‘Gay’ is???
NOTHING! If he did he would feel the same way Bachmann does!
But sadly the poor boy will be condemned to grow up to be gay like his gay mother.
It should be considered the same as child abuse to be raised in such a shameful way!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | December 7, 2011, 2:33 am 2:33 am
Derek Wain, allowing gay marriage does not logically lead to polygamy.
Marriage is between two adults, and our laws clearly state that no one can be in more than one marriage at a time. Gays marrying would be following those same rules.
I remember the last time I heard ‘this will lead to polygamy’. It was when racist people were objecting to inter-racial marriage!
Posted by: Librarian53 | December 7, 2011, 2:35 am 2:35 am
This child was NOT forced, if you paid attention. He WANTED to stay and speak in HIS own words.
Really, fi ANY of you can show any harm done to this child, then by all means.
Posted by: Red | December 7, 2011, 3:40 am 3:40 am
Since Sex seems to be the major problem with MB what if the gay couple that wants to get Married promises not to have Sex. I am sure there are a lot of sexless Couples that are married.
Posted by: joe | December 7, 2011, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Using 8 year olds like that, what a shame. Why can’t they use 8 year old’s like the Anti-Abortionist do and let them carry grisly Signs.
Posted by: joe | December 7, 2011, 3:53 am 3:53 am
Gays can get married in all 50 states, if it is that important to them. They just are not recognized by the state, and why is that so important to them if it is all about love?
Posted by: Carl | December 7, 2011, 4:06 am 4:06 am
Watch the clip!!! She wasn’t nervous, the kid was, she just kept pushing him to tell her. He didn’t want to at one point and she made him. This has nothing to do with her being gay, It has to do with her p!ss poor parenting. Where is child services when you need them.
Posted by: Sam | December 7, 2011, 4:22 am 4:22 am
The population of the earth is now around 7 billion people, and growing rapidly..Most people would agree, that number is about 3 billion beyond what the finite resources of this planet can sustain indefinitely.. If everyone who could reproduce–did.. then that population would grow that much faster. Since homosexuality has been with us since the beginning in both humans and other animals, I suspect that the grand designer (if you will), injects this wildcard into the mix to curb population periodicity. For the republicans, (who up until recently stood for moral principles) this may be difficult to shallow..(so to speak) but once they realize that for some reason these people grow up and earn and spend more than straight people– they will be fine with what ever trip their trigger.
Posted by: jrc903 | December 7, 2011, 5:36 am 5:36 am
My lady and I don’t want kids.
I guess, according to the “Christians” here we shouldn’t ever be having sex.
Posted by: Malcolm G | December 7, 2011, 6:02 am 6:02 am
Poor kid. He whispered because he didn’t believe what he was saying.
Posted by: Eli Farías | December 7, 2011, 6:24 am 6:24 am
8 years olds are not the same as when I was 8, they are a lot more mature than you think so no one can speak on whether he knew better or not. My stance on gay marriage: If your not gay don’t worry about it…it’s not your place nor your business to worry about who someone is intimate with as long as no one’s being hurt….
Posted by: Tatiana | December 7, 2011, 6:55 am 6:55 am
I’m gay and I’m offended by this mother’s prompting of her son to say something that he clearly did not want to say out loud. Hello, folks, leave your children out of politics, please!
Posted by: Troubled.Alex | December 7, 2011, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Sure you are “Alex” and I am Stephen Hawking.
Posted by: stephen hawking | December 7, 2011, 7:47 am 7:47 am
I dislike Bachmann intensely.
I dislike homophobia intensely.
But this IS a cheap stunt and it is blatant manipulation of the kid. The mother is, in no way, “afraid” to speak. She is pushing him into it.
That said, Bachmann is shown in her true loathsomeness and stupidity in the other video referenced in this article
Posted by: Martin8 | December 7, 2011, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Lady, I don’t like Bachmann, but I think I dislike you more.
You manipulate your son and you play us for suckers.
You are giving the whole idea of LGBT rights a bad name. Shame on you.
I would have said this on your YouTube page, but you chickened out of allowing comments. ‘
THAT is how open to free speech YOU are.
Incidentally I support gay marriage 100% but not cheap manipulative grandstanding like this,
You win the Rosie O’Donnell award for unpleasant gay women.
Posted by: GaryHK | December 7, 2011, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Bachmann you are a uneducated ignorant American, your death will be the cherry on my cake! I just hope I get to be the emt responder to your side and allow you to die because your religion violates mine!
Posted by: Thomas Alex | December 7, 2011, 1:35 am 1:35 am
.
.
ABC “News” censors will delete posts criticizing oBama but they leave a post in like this openly advocating for the death of Michelle Bachmann. Thanks for openly confirming your wacko-left-wing bias and also for showing the wacko-left-wingers for the lunatics that they really are.
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | December 7, 2011, 9:18 am 9:18 am
I think I am the only one who thinks this is dumb. 1. the mom should be slapped for making her son say something he doesn’t really understand and was truly embarrassed. two. where did morals go? i guess being straight is not right anymore. your just up with the times unless your gay. I don’t get it anymore. I don’t affiliate myself with anything but I do consider myself a spiritual person and a very moral person. I don’t get it.
Posted by: valerie pena | December 7, 2011, 11:20 am 11:20 am
For those saying that because for years marriage meant man + woman, what about the years that marriage meant that couples couldn’t cross racial “lines”? What about laws that didn’t allow certain individuals to officially marry and receive the benefits afforded to others who married (e.g., slaves). Laws can change to reflect the will of the people, For exampe, the Pledge of Allegiance didn’t always have “One Nation Under God” either, and I’m not saying that because it didn’t this version is somehow reprehensible or immoral. Voting didn’t always mean “blacks could vote” or “women could vote.” Schooling meant segregated schools. Hopefully, laws reflect our growing awareness of what is fair and right, not what must always be. If your “morality” is such that you cannot sanction two loving people benefiting from the same laws that provide rights to others, then at least admit that this would be the logical conclusion from saying that two loving people of any gender cannot marry, just as blacks and whites for years had to live together with private ceremonies of commitment without receiving the same benefits two people of the same race could receive. And if you don’t think an 8-year-old child of a loving couple can appreciate that, you haven’t been around too many 8-year-olds.
Posted by: Cynthia | December 7, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
If your position is that marriage is a religious institution, an idea which many of you obviously espouse, then the Federal Government has no business regulating it. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” In the eyes of the government ALL marriages should be nothing more than civil unions. PEOPLE should be allowed to define their relationships as they see fit and without interference from any outside source.
Posted by: John | December 7, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I have an 8 year old nephew who is articulate and independent of thinking as any 13 year old. If you raise your child to be a free thinker and teach him how to deduce situations on their own and discuss it with them it is possible to have a child that would defend his mother. I know that even at the age of 5 if a child see’s his parent being attacked they will do whatever they can to protect and save their parent. Adults really don’t give children of this modern and advanced age enough credit. Guarenteed this kids are probably a lot smarter than their parents were at that age because of all the developements we’ve had in technology and science. I applaud this young man child for being someone who will grow up loving not hating, searching for truth and not just accepting something just because.
Posted by: 8 year ikd | December 7, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
” i guess being straight is not right anymore. your just up with the times unless your gay.” Turn gay then. You seem to think it’s so easy.
Posted by: Hounddog | December 7, 2011, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“MIchelle Shu”, you seem to have missed the posts from the right wingers consigning gay people and their supporters to hell.
Selective vision?
Posted by: Vox Populus | December 7, 2011, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I grew up in a Lesbian household from ages 5 to my teen years. I was taught then that ‘not all families are the same’, and that it was okay for my mom to be with who she wants. But in my teen years, I realized the inherent lack of relational healthiness going on. I can’t even describe the years of confusion, frustration, and anger I felt… not because of so-called ‘cultural norms’ getting in the way but rather due to the actual psychological and relational hurt that I watched my mother endure, along with my own turmoil, having to grow up in it.
Today my mother is a vehement opponent of homosexual ‘rights’, declares that she’d been lied to all those years by gay propaganda, and that over 20 years of her life were outright wasted.
So, anyone have anything to say about that???
Posted by: Mike - CA | December 7, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
This is actually relevant to the discussion: can you explain what kind of fruit Adam and Eve ate in the story? After thousands of years it’s time to think, read, and give the real explanation based only on the facts in the story. No guesses, opinions, or beliefs. We’ve already had way too many of these. Treat the whole thing as a challenge. You can do it! Or can you? But first, do a quick Google search: First Scandal.
Posted by: Robert Hagedorn | December 7, 2011, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Mike, it’s not rare for people to internalize the hate of society.
I know gay men who are happy with who they are and I know gay men who are full of self-loathing, and believe God or whatever will cure their gayness. The only problem is they dwell with excruciating detail on their former gay life and become rabidly anti gay rights themselves.
Either your mother lived inauthentically, or she is unhealthily full of self loathing. And it probably isn’t helped by having a child that does not accept her either.
Posted by: Martin Lawrence | December 7, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Mike, most likely she had a bad breakup with her partner and remains bitter.
But what’s YOUR issue with her living her own life?
Posted by: Doc Spock | December 7, 2011, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Mike-CA, here’s what I have to say:
Plenty of us grew up in dysfunctional heterosexual relationships too. It isn’t the orientation that was the problem, it’s the individuals.
Propaganda can’t make most of us eat broccoli if we don’t like it, let alone prefer to have sex with someone with the same body parts.
It’s healthier to own your own decisions.
Posted by: quoquo | December 7, 2011, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Martin, while I respect your input, I have to say that you couldn’t be more wrong, particularly when it comes to what happened with us. Just to be clear, my mother and I are very close and have been all through the years. It had nothing to do with inauthenticity… believe me, she was very deep into the lifestyle. “Accepting” her was never the issue, either. She came to her OWN conclusion that while the feelings were there, the lifestyle she chose was a mistake. And nobody convinced her of it. She just finally had enough of the pain that her lifestyle was causing her. She feels she’s relieved of the pain by having removed herself from it all. And now I even have to remind her to have compassion toward lesbians, today. In either case, it was a painful part of her life and a painful childhood for me.
There’s no self-loathing. Just a recognition that it wasn’t the best situation to be in, as a family.
Posted by: Mike - CA | December 7, 2011, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
“God doesn’t like figs.”
That explains it. One little spelling mistake and the Westboro Baptists decide to use this fact to go on an anti-gay rampage.
Posted by: Hardy Moore | December 7, 2011, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Mike, either the pain came from the person with whom she was in the relationship, OR it came from being uncomfortable with social condemnation and possibly familial rejection, OR it came from the fact that she was not comfortable with her life (which is, by definition, inauthentic living.)
None of those things, except the social condemnation, is exclusive to same-sex relationships.
You can have intense feelings for members of the same sex, but if you don’t LIKE the physical component, you won’t be turned on by it. Blaming “gay propaganda” for your decisions is a cop out.
Incidentally, I am a straight man, and no amount of propaganda is going to make me have a stronger physical response to Johnny Depp than to Scarlett Johanssen, much as I admire Mr Depp’s acting.
Posted by: Martin Lawrence | December 7, 2011, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
QuoQuo: I would agree about the common denominator being dysfunction. She grew up in a dysfunctional situation, to be sure. Her parents had a lot of issues, and she definitely suffered from feeling emotionally detached from her mother in big, big ways. Hence, her decision to swing the opposite direction for her own happiness. So, I certainly do not argue with you that there are dysfunctional heterosexual marriages.
Something I’d like everyone here to understand is that I’m speaking from a lot of exposure, experience, and insight into the gay lifestyle, based on my previous descriptions. While I generally endeavor to keep a cool head on the issue, what really burns me is when folks summarily dismiss the breadth of life experiences (two decades, folks) for both of us. And do you really think that the only relationship I witnessed was one lesbian one? Dude… I grew up AROUND the culture. I witnessed many others’ relationships (I lost count of the number of break-ups), their hopes for their relationships and their failures. The drug use, the alcohol, the abuse, the bitterness and anger, and the continual cycle of all those things that seemed to plague the whole social sphere I witnessed. It wasn’t just an ‘isolated instance’. I watched the lesbian world from inside my family for years. I think I have justifiable context to be speaking from. The same goes for my mother. If she were to ever write a book, she’d blow us all away.
Her story, our story, is real. To say otherwise is prejudice and ignorant. And just because what we have to say doesn’t fit the LGBT agenda, doesn’t mean that there isn’t something to be learned from it.
Posted by: Mike - CA | December 7, 2011, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Gotta say I’m a bit suspicious about someone who claims to have lived in a gay environment, and been accepting, and comes out with trigger words like “gay lifestyle”.
Posted by: Pink Bertie | December 7, 2011, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Mike – CA, if what you say is true you got in with a pretty weird bunch of lesbians. That couldn’t be further removed from the lesbian relationships I know. When you start extrapolating your mom’s experience to the whole orientation, I get more suspicious about your argument.
There isn’t any less abuse in lesbian relationships than in straight ones – there are many surveys that show us that, to the discomfort of feminists – but there certainly isn’t any more either. And any claim that this is so is a downright bare-faced lie. Same goes for drug use, and alcohol. Believe me (or not), I know this. If Newt Gingrich were a lesbian, would you be blaming his relationship callousness on his orientation?
People are people. Sexual orientation is a side show.
Posted by: quoquo | December 7, 2011, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Uh oh.
“LGBT agenda”.
Another conservative trigger expression. Jesus next?
Posted by: Pink Bertie | December 7, 2011, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Abusive lesbians? Ha ha ha.
Meanwhile in Texas, a conservative judge psychotically thrashes his daughter with a belt, and you don’t get anyone saying this is related to his sexual orientation.
Posted by: Floretta | December 7, 2011, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
*sigh* Once again, I seem to be trying to speak with people who refuse to listen to any view point other than their own. Yet another example of why it’s so hard to work together. It was worth a try, I guess. Perhaps there are some people here that want to have a discussion, rather than a bash-fest. I’m sensing more of the bash-fest here. Thus my comment earlier. Happy Holidays folks.
Posted by: Mike - CA | December 7, 2011, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Mike – CA, your experience is your experience, and can’t be gainsaid. But how do you want to “work together”?
You seem uninterested in the idea that lesbians are people with the same foibles as everyone else. You seem to want to claim that your experience, as limited as any of ours, is somehow more defining of a group. I work with a lesbian couple who have had a wonderful relationship for thirty years. So who is actually bashing?
Other people may have entirely different experiences in the gay community that are diametrically opposed to yours. And this can happen in the straight community too.
One of my cousins was regularly abused by her alcoholic husband. One of my nephews was tortured by his heterosexual mother and her new boyfriend with cigarette burns and blows until my brother regained custody. My question for you is why you only want to identify these things with sexual orientation when it is non heterosexual.
Posted by: quoquo | December 7, 2011, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
I cannot believe the amount of people here who actually believe that an 8 year old follows politics so closely that he feels it neccessary to voice his own, strong convictions against a politician who’s veiws he has been following and he disagrees with. How about this…I will accept this form of parenting as “OK” when you show me a conservative or republican who has their 8 year old children march up to Barney Frank and announce that homosexuals are sinners. Somehow…I don’t expect this to happen because conservatives have a lot more class.
Posted by: Henry | December 7, 2011, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
The 8 yo was not coached! Most LGBT’s are aware of the Sexuality at the age of 8. So for him to think that nothing is wrong with his mom is correct. It’s his mom, why wouldn’t he think there was nothing wrong with her?
Posted by: Thomas Alex | December 7, 2011, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
@CHRISSIE
Biology proves that sexual orientation is an immutable characteristic. Biology applies equally. If Gays were not born that way, then nor were straights. Only religion discriminates, science does not.
Posted by: Thomas Alex | December 7, 2011, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
I don’t like Michelle Bachmann, and think she is a whack job. Especially in regards to her views on gay marriage,
However, putting an 8 year old up to this is completely out of line. The mom was standing right there. She didn’t even have the gutts to say it herself. If you get the chance, say something directly. Don’t hide set up your kids.
The “Mic Check” of New Gingrich was much more appropriate form of protest.
Posted by: Bob Smith | December 9, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Let’s get this straight, people. There is marriage, there is sex and their is procreation. They have little to do with one another. People can (and do) procreate without having sex. People have sex (lots of it!) with no intention whatsoever of procreating. And marriage is primarily about the passing of property between people who consider themselves family, without the expense and inconvenience of probate. If I want to marry someone of the same gender, please do not presume that I am necessarily sticking something somewhere you believe it doesn’t belong. I’ll give you a dollar for every person out of 100 randomly chosen people who ONLY stick “tab A” in “slot B”. Intimate relations are none of your business, nor are they any of mine. And government has no place in the regulation thereof–except in the case of minors who are incapable of making an informed adult choice and, of course, Jerry Sandusky.
Posted by: architeacher | December 9, 2011, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
So it’s okay for gay people to get married! As long as a gay guy marries a women or a lesbian marries a man!
okay so now we know she married her husban. :)
Posted by: ken | December 11, 2011, 2:12 am 2:12 am
After veiwing the entire video it is clear that this boy is being forced to do this. And alyhough I too feel that marriage is between man & woman only…I don’t care how this mom chooses to live her life. However, no child, whether he has straight or gay parents, should be forced to do his parents biding in this manner. He is only 8! He cannot gully grasp this very emotional subject. Dirty…very dirty way to make her point.
Posted by: bellus | December 14, 2011, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Leave it to the left to use a boy as a tool for their agenda. Remember, over half the country agrees with Bachmann’s views.
Posted by: TJ in CA | December 17, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am