Comments on: Gingrich on a First Lady Calista — Nancy Reagan + Laura Bush, with a Dash of Jackie Kennedy

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:40:19 +0000

She sounds uppity to me.

See what I did there?

By: Al

Al — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:49:34 +0000

“Gingrich was lying before a grand jury? Obstructing justice? Who knew…..”

Time to do a little research on Mr. Gingrich, and why he was thrown out of power, not to mention the whole Clinton fiasco was a rouse, which cost tax payers millions. They impeached Clinton over an affair, and a “think of the children” campaign. Years later, all the GOP crooks keep getting caught with their pants down, and many have gone on record saying that Clinton’s impeachment was payback for Nixon. The Right made so many fantastic allegations about the Clintons, that they were sure their investigation would prove those fantasies right. When nothing was found, they had to play up the affair for all it was worth. Interestingly, but not shockingly, they spent more money on investigating Clinton, than investigating 9/11. Clinton should never have testified, just as Bush and Cheney gave the finger to their indictments.

By: Al

Al — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:41:12 +0000

Nancy Reagan, who blew millions of tax dollars on fashion and toilet seats, not to mention psychics. Then there’s Laura Bush, a woman who looked medicated up to her eyeballs and actually killed someone. Yeah, I’m sure these were remarkable women in Newt’s eyes. Calista raked up a $200,000 bill at Tiffany’s.

By: Cynthia Kelley

Cynthia Kelley — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 00:01:13 +0000

First of all that’s a pretty high opinion of oneself, which makes me very uncomfortable. Second of she is nothing but a power hungry woman, who helped break up a marriage. I do not wish to see her as a first lady of anything. The queen of narcissism. Is Mr. Gingrich really under that type of woman’s spell?

By: bja

bja — Sat, 03 Dec 2011 07:16:28 +0000

You look at all the comments on negative articles about Ron Paul and you will see 1000 educated and articulate people come to his defense singing his praises. You look at all the comments on positive articles pushing Newt Gingrich on the American voters and you see 1000 comments pointing out Newt’s flaws, hypocrisy and defects. So tell me, how exactly is Newt a front runner and Ron is not?

By: SR

SR — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:35:09 +0000

Newt’s breakup line to his second wife, Marianne, was ‘I can’t handle a Jaguar right now. All I want is a Chevrolet.’ Now the Ms. Chevy is a Nancy Reagan + Laura Bush + a dash of Jackie Kennedy.

Newt is soulless selfish fascist that is a worse threat to this nation than the deficit or Al Qaeda.

By: Joe berardy

Joe berardy — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:04:36 +0000

This is exactly why we can not allow Newt to gain the nomination. How could he compare his mistress, now wife, to former 1st Ladies? Calista knew Newt was married, she knew she / he was committing adultry, is this the moral caliber of someone who would be our President? I say a resounding NO !!!!

By: Lizzie

Lizzie — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:29:02 +0000

BEN E. i’m not defending Newt, but you are rehashing points that the democrats have been spinning for years to suit their purpose, and by your post I bet you were still in diapers when all that happened.

By: Michelle Shu Jas

Michelle Shu Jas — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:20:04 +0000

ben emos wrote:”He was impeaching Clinton of the same crime he was guilty of.”
.
Gingrich was lying before a grand jury? Obstructing justice? Who knew…..

By: Bob

Bob — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:26:11 +0000

Well, I guess we all don’t have to vote now. Newt says he’s going to be the nominee and his wife is the Mrs. Kennedy/Reagan/Bush incarnate. Let’s just get them in office now. Why wait another year?