Mitt, Meet Expectations In Iowa (The Note)
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney greets supporters after a campaign stop at Homer's Deli and Bakery in Clinton, Iowa, Dec. 28, 2011. - Chris Carlson / AP Photo
By MICHAEL FALCONE (@michaelpfalcone) and AMY WALTER (@amyewalter)
WATERLOO, Iowa — For months, Mitt Romney and his top aides have been pulling out all the stops to downplay their expectations in Iowa, but there’s nothing they can do about it now.
If Romney does not finish in a strong first or second place in next Tuesday’s caucuses, he’s going to have some major explaining to do thanks not only to new polling that shows him climbing to the top of the pack in Iowa but also to the optics of the past few days of campaign events here.
Romney has been drawing crowds numbering in the hundreds wherever he goes.
They spilled out of a hotel ballroom in Davenport, Iowa on Tuesday night to hear his closing argument speech, they lined up at a coffee shop in Muscatine before the sun rose Wednesday morning to throw a couple questions his way and so many people — about 450 in all — showed up to a lunchtime meet-and-greet at a Clinton, Iowa deli yesterday that the campaign decided to stage an impromptu event with Romney at another restaurant across the street to accommodate the overflow.
“What an audience, what a crowd!” Romney told his audience of hundreds at a North Liberty, Iowa plastics factory last night. “This is amazing — the enthusiasm, the energy. This is fabulous.” http://bloom.bg/vhC8K5
Though political campaigns are notoriously expert at filling venues to create the appearance of a well-attended event, the growing fervor for Romney among the Iowans who are showing up to see him this week is palpable.
Romney is also boosted (and trapped) by his own poll numbers. A new CNN-Time survey of Iowa registered Republicans out yesterday showed Romney in the lead in the Hawkeye State with 25 percent support. His closest competitor, Ron Paul, received 22 percent, followed by Rick Santorum (16 percent), Newt Gingrich (14 percent), Rick Perry (11 percent) and Michele Bachmann (9 percent). http://bit.ly/u7hAkI
(Gingrich’s drop has been precipitous since a similar poll taken earlier this month when he was riding high in Iowa and pulling in 33 percent support.)
For his part, Romney has remained coy about the trajectory of his campaign and the burdens that come with it, telling reporters last night that “we’re moving upward,” and, “that’s a good sign.” http://abcn.ws/uBxp8S
At another one of his campaign stops before the new poll numbers became public, Romney said he was looking forward to a “strong showing.”
“I’m not predicting a win here,” he said. “I’d sure like to win in every state, but I think that’s true of every candidate. I just want to do well here. I’m happy that I’m getting an enthusiastic response, but I’ve got no predictions for exactly where we’ll end up in the tally.”
Not surprisingly, Democrats aren’t letting him off that easy. The Democratic National Committee blasted out a memo Wednesday morning under the banner, “Romney Now Expected to Win Iowa.”
But the Romney campaign is doing its part to fuel the expectations game here too. Romney, himself, told Iowans during a tele-town hall meeting on Monday night that he would be back in the state for New Year’s Eve and he’s expected to be back next week for a caucus night event.
Team Romney has also released a new Iowa television ad today complete with images of “cornfields and cattle, an iPhone with a map of Des Moines, manufacturing equipment, the Thomas Jefferson Memorial, military graves, Romney meeting with voters,” according to the Des Moines Register. http://dmreg.co/tLQH6Q
“It’s the Iowa closer,” the campaign’s communications director Gail Gitcho told the paper.
BOTTOM LINE: The risk a couple weeks ago was that Romney would come in behind Gingrich, setting up a very dangerous situation for the former Massachusetts governor in New Hampshire. That risk is obviously much lower — if not completely mitigated — today. Instead, Romney’s challenge now is to prove that he can grow beyond the base of support he’s had since the very beginning of this contest. If he can prove that he’s got a broad base of GOP support, that will give him serious momentum going into places where he’s not currently favored like South Carolina.
ROMNEY’S CLOSING IOWA AD. From the Romney campaign: “Romney for President today released a new 60 second television advertisement that will run in Iowa titled ‘Freedom And Opportunity.’ The ad, which features video from his announcement speech, highlights Romney’s credentials as a conservative businessman who will defend the economic freedom and opportunity that have made the United States the most powerful nation in the world.” WATCH: http://mi.tt/tmYhEe
ABC’s Jake Tapper reported for “Good Morning America” today on Romney’s momentum heading into the final 5-day stretch before the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses. WATCH: http://abcn.ws/u3c0if
SANTORUM-MENTUM? He’s visited all 99 Iowa counties – many more than once – and he’s earned a reputation as one of the hardest working candidates in presidential politics. And all of those house on the campaign trail are finally starting to pay off. Rick Santorum has gone from near the bottom of the pack to the top three in Iowa, surging to 16 percent in the new CNN-Time Magazine poll out yesterday.
DON’T FORGET: Santorum’s weakness was laid out in the latest CNN poll too. Just 4 percent say he has best chance of beating Obama next year. Meanwhile, 41 percent of Iowa caucus voters picked Romney as best able to win next fall, 17 percent picked Gingrich and 14 percent picked Paul.
And just hours after the new poll was released the beaming GOP hopeful, clad in his signature sweater vest, spoke to about 100 supporters and those still making up their mind for almost two hours Wednesday evening. ABC’s Shushannah Walshe filed a dispatch from Cedar Rapids: During the question and answer part of the town hall Santorum was asked about Ron Paul’s support in Iowa, and the former Pennsylvania senator let loose on the Texas Congressman. “Ron Paul says he’s going to eliminate five departments. Ron Paul passed one bill in 20 years. What give you the idea that he can eliminate anything? I mean, he has absolutely no track record of building any kind of coalition to get anything done anywhere,” Santorum said. “I understand the appeal that Ron Paul has: it’s simple, it’s short — but there’s no track record there.” http://abcn.ws/sRtaLL
DEMOCRATIC COUNTER-PROGRAMMING. A Democratic official e-mails the Note: “On Thursday and Friday Democratic National Committee Vice Chair and Minneapolis Mayor RT Rybak will be on the ground in Iowa to bracket the Republican candidates campaigning around the state. On Wednesday ahead of his trip, Rybak released a memo on Romney’s record to coincide with the launch of Romney’s campaign swing around the state. While in Iowa, Rybak will participate in multiple press events — including a press conference in Ames prior to Romney’s event on Thursday, and a pen & pad in Des Moines on Friday. He will also meet with Democratic Party activists and do a host of local and national cable interviews.”
MICHELE BACHMANN, RON PAUL CAMPAIGNS TANGLE OVER CAMPAIGN DEFECTOR. “On what should have been a triumphant end to a whirlwind 99-county tour of Iowa, GOP contender Michele Bachmann on Wednesday suffered a series of blows to her campaign that began with dismal new poll numbers and ended with her state co-chair defecting to endorse frontrunner Ron Paul,” ABC’s Russell Goldman reports. “State Sen. Kent Sorenson, a tea party Republican who joined Bachmann’s campaign in its earliest days, announced Wednesday he would support Rep. Ron Paul, changing allegiances just six days before the first in the nation Iowa Caucuses. Sorenson said he switched candidates because Paul was ‘the most conservative of this group.’ Soon after Sorenson made his announcement, Bachmann accused him of being paid off by the Paul campaign to abandon her. ‘Kent Sorenson personally told me he was offered a large sum of money to go to work for the Paul campaign,’ Bachmann said in a statement. Sorenson denied receiving any money following the announcement at a Paul rally in Des Moines. Sorensen said the race in Iowa has come down to a two man contest between Paul and former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney, and he didn’t want Romney to win.” http://abcn.ws/uyZBe1
@jmartpolitico: Bachmann IA pol dir Wes Enos says he’s staying with Bach BUT that Sorenson’s move was “in no way financially motivated”
THE NOTE ON THE ROAD. The Note has arrived at Mitt Romney’s first event of the day — another top-of-the morning meet at greet. This one’s at J’s Homestyle Cooking, a restaurant in Cedar Falls, Iowa, where diners (and a phalanx of traveling press) have gathered over coffee and cookies to take the measure of the candidate. Romney has two other events scheduled later in the day, including a grassroots rally in Ames, Iowa. As we noted earlier, crowd sizes at his campaign stops yesterday filled venues to capacity — and then some. The crowd at J’s this morning is, once again, standing room only and the Romney campaign set up an “overflow” tent just outside the diner.
PRIMARY COLORS.
–Mitt Romney also vowed not to “kill” the iconic “Sesame Street” character Big Bird, but intstead just litter his show with advertisements, when answering a question about how he’d balance the budget and which programs he would cut at an event in Clinton, Iowa yesterday. http://abcn.ws/ry5Nee –ABC’s Michael Falcone and Emily Friedman
–Oops, redux: During the Westside Conservative Club breakfast at the Machine Shed in Urbandale, Iowa yesterday, Perry surrogate Sheriff Joe Arpaio accidentally called Iowans “Buckeyes,” but the audience quickly shouted him down with boo’s and no’s. Perry later stepped in to smooth over the situation and asked the crowd if there were any Cyclones in the audience. –ABC’s Arlette Saenz
THE BUZZ
RON PAUL GREETS IOWA VOTERS WITH A PROMISE TO BRING HOME THE TROOPS. A dispatch from ABC’s Jason Volack on the campaign trail with Ron Paul: Paul told a room full of veterans Wednesday night that he plans to drastically cut overseas spending. “It would mean that we would bring the troops home,” Paul slowly said, smiling as he touted the economic benefit during a salute to veterans rally in Des Moines, Iowa. Earlier in the day, Paul again questioned why the United States needed to maintain a military presence in Australia, Germany, Japan and South Korea — even as the death of the North Korean leader Kim Jong Il raised concerns about the region’s stability. “How long do we have to stay in Korea?” he asked at a campaign event at the Iowa Speedway in Newton. “We were there since I was in high school.” Paul’s non-interventionist view for America is sure to incite even more criticism from his GOP rivals, who have been hammering the Texas congressman for his view that Iran should be able to develop a nuclear program for peaceful purposes. http://abcn.ws/utG6wH
GINGRICH’S ‘SEMI-SWEET CHALLENGE TO ROMNEY’ “A day after Mitt Romney compared Newt Gingrich’s campaign to Lucille Ball’s zany efforts in a chocolate factory, Gingrich went to an Iowa chocolate factory to challenge Romney on what he called his negative attack ads. ‘Gov. Romney had a cute line yesterday about my team resembling Lucy and the chocolate factory and I just want to say: here I am in the chocolate factory,’ Gingrich said at The Chocolate Season in Algona,” ABC’s Elicia Dover notes. “The semi-sweet barbs began this week after Gingrich’s campaign failed to collect enough eligible signatures to make it on to Virginia’s primary ballot. Romney scoffed at the Gingrich misstep Tuesday, saying, ’It’s more like Lucille Ball at the chocolate factory. I mean, you know, you got to get it organized.’” http://abcn.ws/rupUBE
NOTED: At least one voter The Note spoke to at a Romney campaign event yesterday cited Gingrich’s failure to get on the Virginia ballot as a reason he wasn’t supporting the former House Speaker.
NEWT’S PESKY DEBT. Newt Gingrich’s campaign said it has raised somewhere around $9 million in the fourth quarter, but is holding off on paying earlier bills from the campaign to fund its homestretch drive in the Iowa caucuses. “The campaign for the fourth quarter has raised a similar amount of money to what John McCain raised in 2007 at the same point. It’s about $9 million,” campaign spokesman R.C. Hammond said. The debt reported by the campaign last quarter was $1 million. The Gingrich camp said Wednesday it has paid back some debt to “mom and pop shops.” Hammond did not know how much cash on hand they would have. http://abcn.ws/sLfjqg
RICK PERRY UNVEILS NEW IOWA AD. “Five days before the caucuses, Rick Perry is looking to drive home the point that he’s the ‘outsider’ in the race releasing a new television ad specifically slamming candidates who served in Congress for a second time on Iowa airwaves,” ABC’s Arlette Saenz reports. Titled ‘Fox,’ the thirty second ad highlights four candidates who worked on Capitol Hill – Rep. Michele Bachmann, Rep. Ron Paul, Former Sen. Rick Santorum, and Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. ‘The fox guarding the henhouse is like asking a congressman to fix Washington: bad idea,’ a voice reads in the ads as pictures of Bachmann, Paul, Santorum, and Gingrich and graphics pop up on the screen. ‘Their years in Congress left us with debt, bailouts. Congressmen get paid $174,000 a year. We get the bill. We need a solution.’” WATCH: http://bit.ly/rWtPrj
SUPER PACS TAKE THE PRESSURE OFF. “Aside from the Iowa caucus on Jan. 3, another date looms that might offer a measure of each presidential candidate’s potential strength, and that date is Dec. 31, the deadline for filing fundraising reports for the final quarter of 2011,” reports ABC’s Matt Negrin. “But those numbers won’t tell the whole story about the amount of money spent to influence the outcome, campaign finance experts said, because of the rise of the super PACs that buy negative TV advertisements and aren’t bound by the same rules regarding donation limits that candidates must follow. … ’The rise of the super PAC has put less pressure on the Republican candidate to raise money in large parts,’ Corrado said. ‘While they’re always interested in raising money, the kind of demands that used to be the expectation of needing to raise $50 million or $100 million by the time you get to year-end haven’t been so intense.’ That also means that the seven Republican presidential candidates can slog through several primary battles and not have to worry as much about missing out on money they could scoop up in a general election.” http://abcn.ws/tL8UX2
THE PRESS DESCENDS ON IOWA. “An estimated 1,500 members of the national and international media are expected to descend on the metro area this week to cover Iowa’s 2012 Republican caucuses. And before they leave on Jan. 4, they will have dropped a small fortune at area hotels and restaurants,” the Des Moines Register’s David Elbert notes. “The focal point for caucus coverage will once again be the Polk County Convention Complex, which has been turned into a media filing center, complete with large-screen monitors and a Google-sponsored play area where reporters, bloggers and producers can relax on caucus night in colorful beanbag chairs, grab a snack or even go for a jog on a treadmill while checking their email. In addition to the truckloads of electronic equipment that the media are bringing to Des Moines, many of the producers, reporters and technicians will bring expense accounts that are greatly appreciated by metro area restaurants and hotels.”
MEANWHILE, IN NEW HAMPSHIRE. The New Hampshire Democratic Party is out with a memo this morning “calling on Mitt Romney to release his tax returns now. Waiting any longer would be unfair and a disservice to New Hampshire voters who are choosing a candidate in the next few days and have the right to know.” The N.H. Democrats are pointing to comments Romney made to reporters yesterday in which the candidate sounded willing to release his returns after previously saying he would not. “No day like today,” said Holly Shulman, communications director for the party. ” Waiting would tilt the process against early state voters who pride themselves on being the most informed in the nation. New Hampshire voters have a right to know.”
WHO’S TWEETING?
@MattMackowiak: My piece for @RollCall: “The Political Winners of 2011″ –bit.ly/tCGgb8 #tcot #RS #GOP
@RealClearScott: Young out-of-state Ron Paul IA volunteers tell me campaign has them sign vow not to speak to media: bit.ly/w1mCtv
@TheFix: “They pick corn in Iowa. They pick presidents in New Hampshire.” — Jon Huntsman. Oh snap.
@PounderFile: Funny line from WH pool report…”Diners have been trying to takes pictures of POTUS, only to be chased off by advance staffers.”
@jeffzeleny: “No tats.” Marching Orders for Paul Volunteers: Do Shave, Don’t Tweet. Must-read from Oppel.nyti.ms/seHxZo
@JenniferJJacobs: Review of attendance & weather patterns shows no clear relationship between weather & Iowa caucus turnout.dmreg.co/uTtosC #iacaucus
POLITICAL RADAR.
–On the second day of his bus tour through the Hawkeye State, Mitt Romney will discuss jobs and the economy in Cedar Falls and Mason City, IA. Later in the evening, he will attend a grassroots rally with supporters in Ames. His sons Josh, Craig, Matt and Tagg Romney will also be out on the trail in New Hampshire.
–Newt Gingrich will continue his “Iowa Jobs and Prosperity Bus Tour” with stops in Sioux City, Storm Lake, Denison and Carroll.
–Ron Paul will hold town hall meetings in Des Moines, Perry, Atlantic and Council Bluffs, IA.
–Michele Bachmann will make several stops in Des Moines and Marshalltown before officially ending her bus tour through Iowa’s 99 counties in Nevada.
–Rick Perry will make stops in Washington, Cedar Rapids and Marshalltown, IA as part of his own bus tour.
–Rick Santorum will meet with voters in Coralville, Wilton, Muscatine and Davenport, IA.
–Jon Huntsman will campaign in Laconia, Boscawen and Wolfeboro, NH.
–Steve Forbes will stump on behalf of Rick Perry in Concord, NH.
–ABC’s Joanna Suarez
GOOD MORNING IOWA. Don’t forget to check The Note blog every morning for the latest edition of “Good Morning Iowa” — a one-stop-shop tip-sheet covering everything you need to know from the Hawkeye State, reported by ABC’s Shushannah Walshe.
DISPATCHES FROM THE TRAIL. Also, keep an eye on our new political website OTUSNews.com (www.Otusnews.com) The Note (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/the-note/) and on ABC News/Politics (http://abcnews.go.com/politics) for rapid-fire updates from the campaign trail between now and the Iowa Caucuses. Follow our reporters in the field on Twitter:
Michele Bachmann: ABC’s Russell Goldman (@GoldmanRussell)
Newt Gingrich: ABC’s Elicia Dover (@EliciaDover)
Jon Huntsman and New Hampshire: ABC’s Susan Archer (@TheOnlyArcher)
Ron Paul: ABC’s Jason Volack (@Jason_Volack)
Rick Perry: ABC’s Arlette Saenz (@ArletteSaenz)
Mitt Romney: ABC’s Emily Friedman (@EmilyABC)
Rick Santorum and Iowa: ABC’s Shushannah Walshe (@shushwalshe)
Check out The Note’s Futures Calendar: http://abcn.ws/ZI9gV
* Get The Note delivered to your inbox every day.
* For breaking political news and analysis check out The Note blog: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/and ABCNews.com/Politics: http://abcnews.com/politics

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Amazing to me is the fact that ALL candidates, ALL parties, seem to be able to raise millions of dollars for campaigns yet our economy is in deep trouble! Wouldn’t it be nice if everyone worked together, stopped the long expensive campaigns and put the money towards the ecomony? Guess I’d better stop living in Fantasyland and realize that they are ALL corrupt and crooked and it’s all about money not the people. BTW Congress is way richer…nice…wish I had that kind of a job. It’s a real disgrace BOTH PARTIES including TEA PARTY.
Posted by: Barb | December 29, 2011, 9:17 am 9:17 am
P.S. And that my friends is why we cannot get a really decent honest person for any job whether president, congress, etc. You need money and you need to pay off people that helped you get there with favors. What a racket.
Posted by: Barb | December 29, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am
well Iowans love the Massachusetts liberal governors – don’t let anyone tell you they don’t.
What’s sad is watching these voters sway in the wind – the media builds up one candidate, then tears them down – and the voters support one candidate – then stop supporting them.
Except for Ron Paul voters, these Iowans are slaves to whatever the media tells them.
Now its Rick Santorum’s turn? Well I guess he has to hope he peaks on election day, then he gets to win – then on to the task of tearing Rick Santorum back down.
Meanwhile Romney is projected to win with his 25% support – that’s the new ‘majority’ I guess.
And meanwhile Romney might even beat Obama, not that it’ll make any difference since he’ll run the country the same way Obama does – they are both political operatives that don’t have a philosophy – just a management style. And that means the philosophy comes from the permanent washington bureaucracy class.
Posted by: RoboBobo | December 29, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Oh, I agree Barb. I agree. And IOWA seems to not know this guy bilks companies, sending us further down the drain. I think we shouldn’t vote (all of us).
Posted by: Gina | December 29, 2011, 10:24 am 10:24 am
and yes Gina Romney is not a good choice. It seems the way the GOP go after Pres. Obama they would put a real candidate up. this is the cream of their crop?..that’s why I say there is fraud and corruption. No honest person can run for president…they need money and favors and then must repay those favors no matter who it is.
Posted by: Barb | December 29, 2011, 10:36 am 10:36 am
President Obama carried Iowa by 9 percentage points in 2008. The people who vote in these caucuses represent probably less than 5% of the states qualified voters. If this republican circus continues he’ll probably win by 20%. The same goes for the other states, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 29, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am
1st place Santorum; 2nd place Paul; 3rd place; Romney; 4th place Gingrich; 5th place Bachmann; 6th place Perry
Posted by: annette | December 29, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am
And to think all these people spending all this money just to end up in 2nd place in the national election.
Posted by: dan | December 29, 2011, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Why the republicans want a businessman as president is beyond me. The US government is not IBM, Google or Bain Capital. If the founders would have wanted it to be a business they would have added many financial restrictions to the Constitution, including a balanced budget amendment.
If you want a government controlled and run by big business vote for Mitt. If you want a government controlled a run by the people, you better find someone else.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 29, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I would just like to take this opportunity to thank the Republican party for putting on this marvelous show, not only once but many times, of your candidates, where every one of them has proven by their comments about each other, that none of them are qualified or deserve to be elected.
You handled this as well as your decision to invade Iraq and to deregulate the financial industry.
You guys are good. For Nothing.
Posted by: Phillip Bunnell | December 29, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
“You handled this as well as your decision to invade Iraq and to deregulate the financial industry.
You guys are good. For Nothing.——————— Phil ,I agree 1000% . I’d vote for Putin before I’d vote for ANY conservative . All , I mean ALL they ever do when they are in power is lie and scam / scam and lie , repeat ad nauseum .
Posted by: davem | December 29, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I don’t know these candidates personally , but publicly they are NOT what I would want representing the U.S.A. as president. President Barack Obama has done an outstanding job representing the best of what America is. America at its best is diverse, flexible and intelligent. Not one of these candidates have that. They all want to be seen as the most narrow minded and “conservative”. That is a perfect way to be for the year 1911.. when the country had oppressive, discriminatory and racists laws. Only stiff -necked, isolationalists, mean-spirited people would want to take America back to that. America has grown so much. We don’t need laws that put the chains back on people and restrict happiness to American citizens outside the Southern white Christian or rich section by once again voting in elected officials who want to legislate their specific religious beliefs that would negatively impact other ethnic and socioeconomic groups..
Posted by: TV | December 29, 2011, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
I will vote Ron Paul no matter how hard the media tries to make me vote for thise flip-flopper guy.
Ron Paul all the way.
Posted by: carlo | December 29, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
So – Romney floats again to the top. This empty suit is all the GOP can muster just before the votes. Romney isn’t saying much except to speak against Obama. He says he knows the economy. How can an aloof millionaire really know what is happening down in the middle class trenches? All this guy knows is being head of Bain Capital and having the power to cut costs by laying off people. He won’t ever be broke and down and out like millions of former middle class Americans who have had their jobs taken away by the likes of Mitt. Capitalism today is pretty tough and globalism is destroying American ability to retain good paying jobs. Mitt can’t run the country like he did Bain Capital. Congress is the great equalizer and source of discouragement to ambitious presidents.
Posted by: Bob | December 29, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
The problem with every one of these clowns is that they are each a one-trick-pony. Completely one dimensional in their appeal. Some want Romney because of his business experience, but hate everything else about him, from his flip flops to his RomneyCare to his silver spoon upbringing to his religion. Some want Paul because of his isolationism stance or his supposed fiscal responsibility, but reject his calls to legalize all drugs, deregulate all industries, and eliminate a million federal jobs by eliminating many federal departments like the EPA and the Department of Education. Some want Santorum or Bachmann or Perry because of their religious stance and “conservative views” on social issues, but don’t buy anything else that they are selling. Some want Newt because….. well, I’m not sure why anyone wants Newt. But some people obviously do. No one wants Huntsman, but his ‘trick’ is he is the only candidate with genuine foreign policy experience and credibility. Unfortunately for him, he’s much too moderate for the new Right Wing, since it got taken over by the Tea people. And THAT is a cynic’s view of the Republican field.
Posted by: A Cynic | December 29, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
“Corporations are people too” This Freudian slip shows exactly where Mitt Romney’s interests are. He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, inheriting billions from his father. He has gotten where he’s gotten not by talent, intelligence or hard work but by money, influence pedaling and corporate stupidity.
This man has nothing in common with the American people and if by some miracle elected will set us back 20 years.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 29, 2011, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
The candidate that I support is getting an amazingly warm reception from the wonderful people of Iowa and New Hampshire. This has come as a breath of fresh air.
A lot of volunteers, campaign staff, and of course the candidate himself has put in over time, day after day to achieve something together.
When people come out and participate constructively in the democratic process, and we are fortunate enough to earn their trust and support, I feel a tremendous sense of fraternity with them.
In one town hall, people came and shook hands enthusiastically with the candidate, and I could feel in each handshake a connection, a human bond, and the whole room was electric.
People who walked into that room left with a sense of catharsis.
I don’t want to presume anything as the race is very tight, all we can do is continue to work hard, and I am hopeful that we will be rewarded by the people of Iowa on Tuesday night with a positive result.
Posted by: Voters Will Decide | December 29, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
I think Romney has played this campaign very well. He knew he was the most well known name of the group. And when everyone knows who you are, its easy to get tired of them. So he stood back, let the voters go through the process of getting to know the other people since Romney wasn’t the surprise candidate. Now we’re into the last month and Romney is reminding everyone who he is and what he stands for and now that the other jokers have been checked out, its time to start voting. Very smart campaign.
Posted by: Wendilynn | December 30, 2011, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Mitt Romney talks and talks but never says anything. He criticizes President Obama every other sentence but never gets specific about any issue. He’s like one of those corporate commercials that never tell you the truth until you read the fine print at the bottom.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 30, 2011, 10:37 am 10:37 am
WOW.. I see all the standard posters are on board with this story.. Do they pay y’all extra for working during the holidays?? Let me hit a few of the more outstanding bits of “liberal drivil” if I may:
BARB–”ALL parties, seem to be able to raise millions of dollars for campaigns yet our economy is in deep trouble! Wouldn’t it be nice if everyone worked together, stopped the long expensive campaigns and put the money towards the ecomony?”— are you aware that if you added together ALL the campaign money (including the one BILLION that has been raised for Obama) it would pay less than 3 days worth of our debt? Thats the problem, this country is being taken straight to economic hell by out of control spending and peiople don’t even understand or grasp the scope of our problems.. which is why we voted in and continue to support a man who only cares about continued unsustainable spending to garner votes from the “entitlement” class. –TMFERRETTI –”Why the republicans want a businessman as president is beyond me. The US government is not IBM, Google or Bain Capital. If the founders would have wanted it to be a business they would have added many financial restrictions to the Constitution, including a balanced budget amendment.”—Actually if you read and really paid attention to the intent of the constitution, they DID create this country under a business model. the federal government was tasked with a VERY short list of functions.. namely protection against other enemies, and the requirement to allow the people to have individual rights and liberty to do as they wished.. (protection and the promotion of entrepreneurial freedom is the model that made companies like microsoft , IBM, and others the ultra successes that they are). beyond that, the federal government was supposed to stay OUT OF THE WAY and let the states (the equivelent of business departments) manage themselves. —TV — “but publicly they are NOT what I would want representing the U.S.A. as president. President Barack Obama has done an outstanding job representing the best of what America is. America at its best is diverse, flexible and intelligent”– I love this line best of all.. Lets say for a moment that you are right.. that Obama represents what America is.. It seems his representation is that America can not fend for itself, we are weak in mind and spirit, we can only survive as a country, as large companies, or as individuals if the government hands us money to get us through to the next scheduled handout… a few years ago, unemployment benefits ran for 26 weeks, now its 99 weeks.. 47% of Americans are now on food stamps, a record number of people are on welfare or some other form of government assistance like housing assistance, college loan deferrment/forgiveness programs, or food assistance. unemployment is only “going down” because they changed the way they are measuring it, just like they changed the way they measure inflation. Real unemployment is near 11% and underemployment is near 20%. I am sorry TV but this may be what you THINK america should be but its not… America was created to alloow people to succeed (or fail) based on their OWN ability… it was not created to be a safety net that allows people to ferment in their own sloth until the country rots away from the core outward.. Obama’s vision of America is everything that we are NOT…but the choice is yours, you can support his goals and live BY the grace of government until we collapse (shortly) or you can reject that in lieu of a live in which you must work hard and you may fail, but your children will have abrighter future than you do… its your choice…
Posted by: arkey vet | December 30, 2011, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
ARKY VET
There are very few financial restrictions in the Constitution for the very reasons you listed. In time of war, natural disasters and economic disasters the founders knew money would have to be spent, despite a national debt. They did not restrict future generations from doing what they had to do to protect the people both physically and economically.
You and I both know that the purpose of business is not to create jobs. In fact the opposite is true; the same output with less labor is the desired situation. A main goal of a company is to reduce the cost of labor as much as possible, example out-sourcing.
The only way a company will hire is the need to increase output to meet demand. The fastest way to increase demand, hence hiring, is to put money into the hands of the people who will spend it on new products. Lowering taxes and de=regulating big business has minimal effect. We see that today where companies are hoarding money until demand increases.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 31, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am
watching gina romney not liking it very much my vote goes to santorum he knows what he talking about with facts other than that the repubs don’t have a strong canidate
Posted by: david | January 1, 2012, 5:34 am 5:34 am
I predict that Mitt Romney will win Iowa tomorrow and he will do so by a wider margin than the polls now indicate. This is because those Iowa GOP voters who are still undecided, at the end of the day, want one thing more than anything else: To defeat Bacak Obama in November.
Most of them will ultimately come to the rather obvious conclusion that Mitt Romney gives them the best chance to do that. Despite Santorum’s recent “surge”, he will ultimately go the way of Bachman, Perry, Cain, Gingrich, and soon Ron Paul. Like all of them, he is a fatally flawed candidate who is too closely associated with the extreme right and who would have no chance whatsoever of beating Obama.
Posted by: Danram | January 2, 2012, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm