By ABC News

Dec 31, 2011 1:39pm

Obama Maps Out ‘Warrior of Working Class’ Message

By STEPHANIE Z. SMITH

The president will continue to claim the mantle for “warrior of the working class” in 2012 in stark contrast to the public perception that Republicans in Congress are backing millionaires, not the middle class, a senior White House official tells ABC News.

And that message will be carried through President Obama’s reelection campaign next year. “We’re going to be doubling down on our commitment and our message in terms of fighting for the middle class,” Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters covering the president in Hawaii.

After a heated battle between the White House and House Republicans, the payroll tax cut was extended until the end of February — a battle the president ultimately won albeit for just two months. It also delayed the president’s vacation here, but the White House official noted that it gave the president and his senior advisers time to work through policy proposals that they plan to roll out in the new year —  one being to extend the payroll tax cut through the end of 2012.

“The significance of that fight is that it gave the president an opportunity to establish his bona fides on an issue that, at least in recent history, Democrats haven’t necessarily fared very well with, which is the issue of taxes,” Earnest noted.

And extending it through the end of 2012 is a “must-do item of business” on the president’s Congressional agenda. “I think the president still has a strong hand on the payroll tax,” observed Rick Klein, senior Washington editor for “World News with Diane Sawyer.”  ”It’s going to be hard not to extend it for a year, politically.”

ABC New Political Director Amy Walter added:  ”The Obama folks should take some comfort in the fact that Obama’s numbers have improved in the wake of the payroll tax fight. Republicans looked disorganized and petty, which helped Obama look more presidential.”

“We Can’t Wait”

Another key part of early 2012 will be to ramp up the pace of  the “We Can’t Wait” initiatives. Since October, President Obama put in place some 20 executive actions that do not require Congressional approval and aim to boost public opinion of his job performance. They included orders to help borrowers refinance their mortgage loans, new job search tools for unemployed military veterans and a program to help college students manage their student loans.

“The president will also be demonstrating to the American public that he’s not going to wait on Congress,” Earnest said and predicts the orders will be issued at the same pace as before — around two to three a week. “He’s going to seize every opportunity that he has to put in place the kinds of policies that will continue and strengthen our economic recovery.”

Congress Versus President

The White House hopes it will give “an image of a gridlocked, dysfunctional Congress, and a president who’s leaving no stone unturned to try to find solutions to the difficult financial challenges and economic challenges facing this country,” Earnest added. And a vision they hope will translate to voters: “In terms of the president’s relationship with Congress in 2012…the state of the debate, if you will, the president is no longer tied to Washington, D.C.”

“There are certainly a number of other things that we’re interested in trying to work with Congress to get done. But the reason that that is important is, is it does allow the president to take his case to the American public and not get sucked into a policy debate in the weeds that often seems pretty inaccessible to people all across the country,” Earnest said.

Says ABC’s Walters: “Ultimately, the question a lot of voters are going to be asking themselves next fall is this: If Obama can’t work with GOP Congress to get stuff done now, why will he be able to do it in 2013 when Congress will still be controlled by the GOP?”

The Message:  A Fair Shake, Fair Shot and Fair Share

The White House is currently honing its main message which was previewed in a speech the president gave on December 6 in Osawatomie, Kansas, where he mentioned the words middle class 28 times. That message — give Americans a fair shake, a fair shot, and that everybody pays their fair share — is one shared by protesters of Occupy Wall Street and one the White House hopes resonates with voters.

“Today, thanks to loopholes and shelters, a quarter of all millionaires now pay lower tax rates than millions of you, millions of middle-class families. Some billionaires have a tax rate as low as 1 percent. One percent. That is the height of unfairness,” Obama said. “It is wrong. It’s wrong that in the United States of America, a teacher or a nurse or a construction worker, maybe earns $50,000 a year, should pay a higher tax rate than somebody raking in $50 million.”

“You see the start of a compelling message, particularly around taxes,” Klein observed. “But Democrats won’t have the upper hand on the tax issue very often. They’re going to have to hit the middle class champion note everywhere they go, all year. They do have a chance to portray Republican policies as out of touch, but it’s a bank-shot argument when you’re overseeing an economy that’s still sputtering.”

GOP Candidates

So when does the president begin campaigning? Earnest insists  Obama will not be focused on his reelection campaign in early 2012. “Even though the dial on the odometer has slipped to 2012, the president will be focused on the task at hand. There will be time later in the year to focus on the reelection.”

But Klein predicts we’ll see a full-fledged campaign soon enough. “If they’re not focusing on the reelection until after the Republican nomination is settled, that would be political malpractice. Of course they are focused on it – it’s the prism through which everything will be done in 2012,” Klein said.

“There will be a time and a place for that…and that time and place is not early January,” Earnest said. But he noted that the president will not maintain a low profile as the Republican presidential candidates duke it out. “In the midst of a competitive Republican primary, you can anticipate that the president will continue to be visible, that he’ll continue to have a pretty aggressive travel schedule outside of Washington, D.C.,” Earnest said.

He’ll be out there “advocating for the kinds of policies that will be focused on the economy, and that will be in pretty stark contrast to Republican candidates that will be focused on creative ways to say bad things about their opponents for the presidency.”

As the saying goes, get ready for a bumpy ride.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Obama, warrior of the working class? That’s rich, very rich! Right now, Obama is vacationing in Hawaii, playing many rounds of golf, and eating at the finest restaurants. At the same time, his wife solicits donations for his reelection campaign. Timing is everyting and it’s time for Obama to go!

Posted by: Walter Mitty | December 31, 2011, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Ahh! The campaign slogan is beginning to come together.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 31, 2011, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

It sure is hard to take this goof ball Obama seriously, especially since he still hasn’t figured out that he’s supposed to be President of the entire United States of America and all of it’s citizens.

Posted by: Noz | December 31, 2011, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

The entire article is full of contradictions it’s ridicules. Let me see if I have this right, “After a heated battle between the White House and House Republicans, the payroll tax cut was extended until the end of February — a battle the president ultimately won albeit for just two months.” Was it not the republican congress that wanted the one year extension and senate democrats only two months? “… but the White House official noted that it gave the president and his senior advisers time to work through policy proposals that they plan to roll out in the new year — one being to extend the payroll tax cut through the end of 2012. So who was it that wanted two months and who wanted one year extension of the payroll tax? Twisted, twisted political garbage from STEPHANIE Z. SMITH and ABC news. It gets worse. “Another key part of early 2012 will be to ramp up the pace of the “We Can’t Wait” initiatives. Since October, President Obama put in place some 20 executive actions that do not require Congressional approval and aim to boost public opinion of his job performance.” Hold this thought because eight paragraphs later Mr. Smith quotes Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest . “So when does the president begin campaigning? Earnest insists Obama will not be focused on his reelection campaign in early 2012. There will be time later in the year to focus on the reelection.” Which would have boosted faith in the economy more for individuals and businesses – two months of continued tax relief or 12 months? No, let’s just kick the bucket down the street another time. Again more twisting of statements and lining them up to make the republicans look bad and Obama look good. There are so many contradictions in this article I can’t believe any news company would ever use Mr. Smith’s political writings except for maybe ABC.

Posted by: Sam Kinman | December 31, 2011, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

What is the the “Onion”

Posted by: bob callahan | December 31, 2011, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Republicans call for corporate tax breaks almost every day. It’s ironic how they sit on their hands when it comes to small business and middle class tax breaks. Americans better start paying close attention to who’s on the American peoples side and who’s only on the side of multi-national corporations and the super wealthy. When GOP politicians inject the term “the American people”, they are only talking about corporate America and the wealthy. They fight against employee rights, employee benefits and anything that may help employees and mom and pop businesses. They don’t care about true small business otherwise they would have voted for the bill in 2010 that was a loan bill specifically FOR SMALL BUSINESS!! They ALL voted against it! Don’t you get it?? The GOP are in the pockets of people like the Koch brothers. Joe the plumber need not apply!!

Posted by: Dave | December 31, 2011, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Campaign slogan for 2012: Last Chance for Hope and Change.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 31, 2011, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Obama has had almost 4 years to move this country forward and all he has done is bring the country down. All he will do if he gets 4 more years is blame everyone else and stall the economy with his hollow promises. He promises things to your face and then when he gets back to Washington it will be business as usual. Bringing down the US.

Posted by: Alice | December 31, 2011, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Posted by: Sam Kinman | December 31, 2011, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

You might want to look into all the stipulations the Republicans were attaching to their bill – that is where the difference lies.

Posted by: Bill | December 31, 2011, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I love my current President. There is nobody even remotely capable of doing what he has done in the past 4 years. That is still the case.
He will prevail. We are lucky to have such a patriot. I would not blame him to walk away. He’s gotten little respect for what he has done against such odds.

Posted by: A. D. DiSorda | December 31, 2011, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

The title of the article should be “Warrior for Labor Unions, Government Green dollars for Friends of My Campaign and Socialized Society”. You can also include “Hater of Capitalism” and the Great Divider. You can call Obama a lot of things, but there is one name that will never be associated with him — leader.

Posted by: david | December 31, 2011, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

To all the GOP’ers who attempt to distort..a wonderful site at middleclass.org will show how each party votes, and each member voted..you can pull up the record of these wonderful Republicans, it will show you who they truly represent. In 10 years they have voted on issues that benefited the middle class less than 5%. Do not be fooled, do the research yourself. A vote for the GOP is a vote to allow criminals to make their own rules and police themselves..just look at Wall Street, it’s what they want.

Posted by: D | December 31, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

A.D. Disorder…No one has close to the recording deficit spending YOUR president has done. Is that what you’re talking about? The highest average price per gallon of gas was in 2011. Is that what you’re talking about? We still have very high unemployment, certainly when compared to the eight-year average of the Bush Administration. Is that what you’re talking about? I guess some of us just set the bar a bit higher than you.

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

What’s interesting to me is that I have a brother who retired at 41, a father who could have retired 30 years ago, an Uncle that hasn’t had to “go to work” for 30 years and each of these people would consider themselves part of the “working class”. Why must this president be so divisive? His failed economic policies will not escape the scrutiny of the electorate this time around. It’s a terrible thing to vote for a suit and then end up where we have. Time to return to pro-growth policies that reflect our economic reality. For those of you who believe that we only need more time to see the wisdom of Obama’s policies, you’re delusional. They have been tried before (especially in Europe) and they NEVER achieve what their proponents promise. It’s a matter of record, not partisan opinion.

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

D…Wall Street was among the biggest donors of campaign cash to Obama. Your president had a bulletproof Congressional majority for two years. Spending and rule making is all Congress does. Take a look at what your people did during those first two years and then get back to us.

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

So… he’s now a “warrior for the working class?” What a joke. I have never seen someone who has received so much publicity for so little work. He’s not kept one single promise, and when his job is being threaten, he wants to save our jobs? I can’t believe that no one calls him on this. It is plain bias.

Posted by: Bill | December 31, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

NOZ,.. you haven’t been paying attention.
The reason for 2-month extension instead of 12 is because Republicons attached the Keystone Oil Pipeline to what should be a clean middle class tax relief bill.
You can’t blame anyone for wanting a clean middle class tax relief bill.

Posted by: JohnM | December 31, 2011, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

AL Disorder…you’re the one that said, “I love MY current President.” I never said that gas prices weren’t adjusted for inflation, did I? You just ASSumed that. I live in a house that I AM PAYING for with the wages I EARN at no fewer than two jobs. As you cash your government assistance checks next week, thank the people who are paying taxes so you can enjoy the government crack Obama uses to secure your life-long votes to the Democrat party.

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Obama says he’ll make a decision on Keystone after the election. Wouldn’t want to tick off the environmental fringe in exchange for REAL shovel-ready jobs, would we? Such a coward. Obama would make a great president of France. God help us until January 20, 2013!

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Sam Kinman has it right. Republicons attached the Keystone Pipeline to what otherwise was a clean middle class tax relief bill.
Republicons claim it’s there for job creation. Others say the new positions would be filled by existing employees. Either way the US doesn’t get a drop of that tarsand oil.
So why did they do that? I suspect Republicons are just sticking up for their oil buddies.
THAT is why Obama want’s 2 months to look, instead of being a yes man to the drill baby drill baggars.

Posted by: JohnM | December 31, 2011, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

@Bill He has tried to do everything he promised. That is why he is so unpopular. Americans seem to prefer liars as presidents.

Posted by: Al.DiSorda | December 31, 2011, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

No one knows, at least that I’ve heard on these blogs, the reason Harry Reid cut the payroll S.S. tax relief bill to 2 months instead of 12. The Keystone pipeline is still part of the bill. However Obama can still sit on it until after the election to smooze both the environmentalists and the union portion of his constituency. JohnM, you got it all wrong.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 31, 2011, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Johnm…Keystone was attached to affirm Obama’s real position on creating jobs. Keystone’s been looked at for something like three years. How much more time does your genius president need? He need just until AFTER the next election to make a decision. Unbelievable. He wants to see if he wins reelection before killing this real job creating project again. If he loses, he knows the next president will OK the Keystone project immediately (if it’s not too late). Obama is the biggest coward I have ever had the displeasure of seeing in the Oval. Of course, Carter was an empty suit as well.

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

AL Disorder…you say he has “tried” to do everything he promised. You should do stand up. He’s added as much to the national debt in 34 months as Bush did in 8 years. He called it unpatriotic and un-American (running up the debt for future generations) and voted against raising the debt ceiling during the 10 or 15 minutes he was a senator. I guess things look a bit different from the Oval Office, don’t they. We’ll all be paying for this clown’s ineptitude for decades. Let’s vote for change that makes sense.

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

No one else seems to care that the Democrat-controlled Senate hasn’t passed a full-blown budget in over two years. Where’s the outrage from the liberal news outlets?

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

“So why did they do that? I suspect Republicons are just sticking up for their oil buddies.” — posted by JOHNM ——————– LOL. Don’t you mean Obama and HIS oil buddies?? Seems gas prices were about $1.80 a gallon when Barry was sworn in. And they finally backed off from $4 a gallon just a couple months ago… Yeah, it would be Obama and his oil buddies.

Posted by: Logicsgood | December 31, 2011, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I guess some of us just set the bar a bit higher than you.

Posted by: s | December 31, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

No, some of us just think a little more clearly and honestly than the biased and the bigots.

Posted by: Ben | December 31, 2011, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Seems gas prices were about $1.80 a gallon when Barry was sworn in. And they finally backed off from $4 a gallon just a couple months ago… Yeah, it would be Obama and his oil buddies.

Posted by: Logicsgood | December 31, 2011, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Gas prices hit their all-time high under George W. Bush and were higher than they are now for months in a row. The information is easily available if you chose to actually study it rather than cut and paste from right wing blogs. p.s. – if you’re surprised gas prices are going up into the future, you’re not thinking clearly or honestly at all . . .

Posted by: Ben | December 31, 2011, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

What makes the naive Left think that the oil lobby doesn’t have Democratic supporters in Congress? Have these people been asleep for decades? My God wake up people!

Posted by: newcountryman | December 31, 2011, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

ALICE wrote:”Obama has had almost 4 years to move this country forward and all he has done is bring the country down. All he will do if he gets 4 more years is blame everyone else and stall the economy with his hollow promises. He promises things to your face and then when he gets back to Washington it will be business as usual. Bringing down the US.”

Where do you get your news/information? I have my suspicions.

Seriously, since Obama took office, we’ve added about 3 million private sector jobs.

More private sector jobs were created in 2010 ALONE than in all 8 YEARS of the Bush administration (which, in its last year, saw us LOSING between 250,000 and 850,000 such jobs a MONTH!) That is what this President inherited: over 8 MILLION private sector jobs LOST before he was sworn in.

Currently, we are closing in on 2 YEARS of consecutive monthly private sector job growth, and economic indicators are positive.

Again, 3 MILLION of those jobs have been regained, and his first term isn’t even OVER.

In addition,
has overseen the apprehension and/or bringing to justice of bin Laden, Ghadiffi, and several other terrorist king-pins;

democracy is breaking out across the Muslim world;

the two endless wars the Neo-cons started are officially OVER and our people are coming HOME;

health insurance companies can no longer deny coverage for pre-existing conditions or cap coverage for policy holders;

our gay military members no longer have to engage in the farce that was DADT;

and ALL of the TARP money has been paid BACK (Gingrich was only right on one level when he said that Bush’s TARP was the biggest theft in history….it was the biggest ATTEMPTED theft/transfer of taxpayer money to the private sector in history; Obama came in and attached STRINGS (government ownership and oversight) to that money and they couldn’t pay it back fast enough.

And the national debt, under Obama, has increased at a far LOWER rate than it did under Bush (or under REAGAN, ftm)…Republicans never give a fig for the debt UNTIL a Democrat takes office, then, they scream and cry about it and try to use it to tie the hands of the government. It is a strategy that goes back over a century (read Kevin Phillips). Reagan and Cheney both said (of debt incurred under THEIR administrations) that it was a GOOD thing and/or nothing to worry about. Now, suddenly, the Right is in an uproar over it (even though MOST of it was THEIR doing!)

You’re welcome.

I am sick and tired of the LIES regarding this President and his record. “Bringing the U.S. down”? Are you serious? He inherited a nation which had been driven into the DITCH by the economic and foreign policies of the Republicans and has, in less than 1 term, pulled it OUT of the ditch, got it back on the road, pointing in the right direction, and RUNNING.

Now, the Republicans want the keys back.

Are you KIDDING me?

Seriously, turn off the Fox/Beck/Limbaugh/Hannity et al and pick up your local newspaper or even the Wall Street Journal (which, for all their Right-wing editorializing, regularly publishes the graph of private sector job growth which looks like a capital letter V, with the left side in RED for the last year of the BUSH administration and the right side in BLUE for Obama.)

Or just go on-line and look up the numbers from the Dept. of Labor which show steady growth, fueled exclusively by SMALL to MID-SIZED businesses, hampered mainly by PUBLIC SECTOR job losses (what the Right is doing nationwide to raise the UE rate by eliminating the jobs of government workers, cops, teachers, and firefighters).

Just stop repeating the LIES and come up with some FACTS to justify your position of wanting to go BACK to the SAME failed policies that caused this mess to begin with instead of going FORWARD with what is WORKING to fix it.

This Independent voter loves this country and her kids too much to let that happen.

Posted by: Raven | December 31, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Al.Disorda:
“He has tried to do everything he promised. That is why he is so unpopular. Americans seem to prefer liars as presidents.”

Actually, he is astoundingly POPULAR, his overall approval ratings virtually mirroring those of Ronald Reagan in HIS first term, and his highest and average rating to date BEATING Reagan.

He was elected in a landslide with the highest voter turnout since 1910.

According to recent polls, he has the support of over 80% of Democrats, 30% of Independents, and even 3% of REPUBLICANS.

The top candidates on the Right are polling at roughly 25%.

And the Congress, since the Republicans took the House, is polling at its lowest EVER. Boehner’s approval rating is in the low 30′s. And every time they Republicans attempt to obstruct Obama, HIS ratings go UP and THEIRS go DOWN.

Do the math.

The fact is, Obama is one of the most popular Presidents since FDR. Don’t drink the Right-wing kool-aid. They LIE.

Posted by: Raven | December 31, 2011, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Memo to Ben – Gas prices increased 7% under GWB during his first 26 months in office vs 67% under Obama his first 26 months in office. That’ll really help out during a recession… Additionally at the end of GWB’s second term, gas was 9% lower (adjusted for inflation) than when he took office. Bush responded to $4 a gallon gas by lifting moratoriums on drilling, whereas Obama’s response has been??? Simply put, Obama could not care less about increasing domestic fossil fuel supply….

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | December 31, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

@ Logicsgood

Yes, lets do look at the facts:
During the first twenty-six months of President Bush’s first term in office, the price of gasoline increased by 7%. At the end of his second term, the price had decreased by 9% from the time he took office (adjusted for inflation). During the first twenty-six months of Obama’s term in office, the price of gasoline has spiked over 67% with no relief in site.

Posted by: Pogona | December 31, 2011, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

President Obama should learn from the words of President Kennedy “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country”! We don’t need a nation suckling on big government!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | December 31, 2011, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Raven – That was a response to Ben’s 5:32 post.

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | December 31, 2011, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Warrior of the working class year 3:
Highest yearly gasoline price ever.
Highest number of people on food stamps ever.
1 of 2 people living in poverty highest ever.
Focused like a laser and pivoting the country to ruin.

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 31, 2011, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | December 31, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Never mind $4 gas, gas went to OVER $5 on Bush’s watch.

Posted by: Ben | December 31, 2011, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

OVER $4 on Bush’s watch. Gas is now just over $3.

Posted by: Ben | December 31, 2011, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Ben – $5 a gallon?? I never paid that much. Matter of fact, AAA reported the highest average gas prices occurred in 2011.

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | December 31, 2011, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Ben – $5 a gallon?? I never paid that much. Matter of fact, AAA reported the highest average gas prices occurred in 2011.

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | December 31, 2011, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

typo already correct . . . OVER $4 on Bush’s watch. Gas is now just over $3.

Posted by: Ben | December 31, 2011, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Good Lord ABC – Fix your security!! Another poster’s email address just appeared on my screen (AGAIN !!!!!)

Posted by: Ben | December 31, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 31, 2011, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

The things you list are directly the result of the economic collapse on Bush’s shift. 8 million people lost their jobs – you think that might have something to do with the food stamps and the poverty?

Posted by: Teagan | December 31, 2011, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

“You can’t blame anyone for wanting a clean middle class tax relief bill.” – JohnM

Sure I can. It’s unrealistic to ask for a clean Social Security 2% Vacation Extension Bill.
Congress hasn’t had “clean” bills for many decades now.
The Demos are silly clowns.

Posted by: Noz | December 31, 2011, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

THIS IS THREE YEARS LATER, AND NOW YOU CAN BE INDEFINITELY DETAIN
WITHOUT TRIAL AS A RESULT OF OBAMA SIGNING THE DEFENSE BILL.
MAIN PART HERE IT”S 3 YEARS LATER. AND TRILLIONS SPENT IN THE NAME OF
RECOVERY.

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 31, 2011, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Time to return to pro-growth policies that reflect our economic reality
——————————————————————–

Except that none of the Republican policies are really pro-growth, and ended up crashing the economy last time they were implemented.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | December 31, 2011, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 31, 2011, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

First of all, the ‘detention provisions’ were put in by the defense act by the Republican majority in the House. Second, there have not been ‘trillions’ spent in the name of recovery. Third, the economy has taken on 3 million private sector jobs since Obama became president, and has shed government jobs. Fourth, most of the increase in the debt has occurred because billions of tax dollars were stripped out of the budget when the Bush economic collapse occurred – and those tax revenues are still stripped out today.

Posted by: Teagan | December 31, 2011, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

He’s added as much to the national debt in 34 months as Bush did in 8 years
—————————————————-

a commonly spread myth. Obama has added about $1.5 trillion in new spending obligations. The rest are obligations from previous administrations which could not have been avoided without serious legislative changes. Bush added over $5 trillion in his time in office.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | December 31, 2011, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Teagan, Obama signed the bill he owns it. Remember the word VETO!
Second Google my first post facts. All are FACTS!
AND lastly, It is 3 years later, Google National Debt 2008 and 2011
Trillions Spent! Sorry I’m off to celebrate. Argue again next year.

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 31, 2011, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 31, 2011, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Sorry, deadwrestler you’re either not comprehending or thinking.

The things you list are directly the result of the economic collapse on Bush’s shift. 8 million people lost their jobs – you think that might have something to do with the food stamps and the poverty?

Much of the increase in the debt has occurred because billions of tax dollars were stripped out of the budget when the Bush economic collapse occurred and millions of people lost their jobs and couldn’t pay taes – and those tax revenues are still stripped out today.

The economy has taken on 3 million private sector jobs since Obama’s policies began to take effect – and has shed government jobs.

There have not been ‘trillions’ spent in the name of recovery.

The ‘detention provisions’ were put in by the defense act by the Republican majority in the House and the Senate and signed by the President. Your putting all the blame of the President is naive.

Posted by: Teagan | December 31, 2011, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

For the one or two that are using my name and making left wing comments – your actions do not surprise me. OK, for RAVEN – you did not comment on the number of federal workers OBAMA has added to the federal work force. Nor did you comment on the make up of the so called 3 million jobs. Hummmm… “More private sector jobs were created in 2010 ALONE than in all 8 YEARS of the Bush administration (which, in its last year, saw us LOSING between 250,000 and 850,000 such jobs a MONTH!) That is what this President inherited: over 8 MILLION private sector jobs LOST before he was sworn in.” Tell me how many federal jobs has Obama created in three years? How many years are you willing to give OBAMA before he will accept responsibility for anything. By the end of the Bush administration the housing bubble issue kicked in and both Bush and Obama faced the consequences. However, Obama had control of both the house and senate and instead of going after saving homes and jobs he and his democratic friends went after Obama Care. They lost a year and hundreds of billions of dollars in addition to millions of jobs which even today are not increasing enough to affect the economy. And as for, “And the national debt, under Obama, has increased at a far LOWER rate than it did under Bush (or under REAGAN.” The rate has nothing to do with anything. How did the debt double if not triple under OBAMA? OBAMA and friends have added trillions of dollars to the national debt significantly increasing the debt well above that under the Bush administration. But let’s look at a bigger picture. Who approved stealing money from social security and issuing IOUs to social security administration? Who put in place the mechanism to allow people who could not afford homes to purchase them? Who set up a Ponzi scheme and called it Medicare? Under which two presidents did the national debt double and double again? If you thought I was going to lay all that on the democrats or Obama you’re wrong. Do you think Bush was a great president? No you don’t. Do you think a president that doubles again the national debt and sets aside jobs and the economy to push a health care bill is a great president. I don’t. The whole lot needs to go and unfortunately for you that means Obama and Harry Reid and many of our congress who are bailing out because when they had a chance to work together and find a solution for the recession they chose not to act but to sit in their plush congressional seats and point fingers. It’s kind of like Caesar fiddling away while Rome burned. How long after that did the Roman culture die out? I don’t believe we have that long until the country defaults on its first loans to China.

Posted by: Sam Kinman - On the right | December 31, 2011, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Posted by: Sam Kinman – On the right | December 31, 2011, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Public sector (government) jobs have gone down under Obama. Private sector jobs have gone up.

Posted by: Dave | December 31, 2011, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Obama is on a slippery, slippery slope and obviously doesn’t realize it or just doesn’t care. How many people know the all 435 seats in the lower house are up for grabs in 2012? It happens every 24 years and coincides with the presidential election. In the Senate 33 democrats are up for re-election while only 10 republican seat are up for grabs. Calling Congress ineffective can come back and bite him in the butt. You’re living in a fantasy land if you think the facts that the Democrats have spent 150% more from 2007- 2012 than the Bush Congress from 2001-2006. While that Congress wasn’t frugal, having spent $500 billion more than revenue generated, the current Congress has spent $1.5 trillion more a year. The deficit has gone from $6 trillion to $10 trillion during Bush’s eight years, while Obama has raised the deficit to $16 trillion in three years. How can Obama say he’s for the working man when that same man has to pay the bill. And don’t even talk about taxing the wealthy. The top 20% of earners have paid the same rate or slightly less since before the 80′s. The lower 20% have seen their tax liability go down threefold. The middle 60% have seen their taxes go down also in line with the top 20%. As for the pipeline fiasco that so much misinformation is being bandied about, know this. Canada already supplies 20% of the US’s crude oil needs. The oil sands will only increase more product for US use and this is from a blue state research paper – not a oil company, not an environmentalist concern. The spin around here makes more people dizzy than a runaway merry-go-round. Even Obama’s rallying cries show his true colors. “We can’t wait”, “I have to consolidate power”, ” The warrior of the working class” – All are paraphrased from Mao Zedong’s book written in 1952. Now who’s fooling who?

Posted by: Bob Olson | December 31, 2011, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Well the other day a man had a gun and a large amount of money right at the AIRPORT they stop him right, I’M SICK OF THE KILLING and Crime are you too i want world peace too, WE ALL JUST ABOUT DO TWO THINGS ON EARTH XMAS, NEW YEAR’S AS (WE THE PEOPLE)
MY FAMILY GOES BACK TOO THE 1300′s all are family’s came some ware else ! all i want is world peace and feed the hunger and help the home less and help people get job’s if this is a step to USA peace cool.

Posted by: Mr Penn | January 1, 2012, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Posted by: Bob Olson | December 31, 2011, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

It’s stunning when folks like you are unable to work the ongoing commitments stemming from the Bush administration into the ongoing budget requirements of the Obama administration, and further, you aren’t’ able to factor in the stripping away of revenues because of the economic collapse under Bush. When 8 million people lose their jobs and no longer pay taxes it has a huge effect on the revenue side of the government budget. But please, ignore all that and rant on.

Posted by: Judy | January 1, 2012, 4:38 am 4:38 am

POSTED BY: JUDY | JANUARY 1, 2012, 4:38 AM 4:38 AM

It’s stunning when folks like you are unable to work the ongoing commitments stemming from the Clinton, Johnson and FDR administrations into the ongoing budget requirements of the Bush administration

Posted by: foggy | January 1, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am

It’s stunning when folks like you are unable to work the ongoing commitments stemming from the Clinton, Johnson and FDR administrations into the ongoing budget requirements of the Bush administration

Posted by: foggy | January 1, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am

You’re biased. You left out the TRIPLED national debt and associated interest payments the Reagan administration left for the following administrations. Some kind of factual, logic gap in your brain? Clever, but not smart.

Posted by: Dave | January 1, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

“You left out the TRIPLED national debt and associated interest payments the Reagan administration left for the following administrations.” – Dave

Glad to see a lefty here who understands that increasing the federal debt by trillions is really bad.
Even though Reagan was a piker and only did Billions he’s worthy of an honorable mention.
So far Barry is king when it comes to the amount of debt being piled up.
So Dave, what do you think we could do to get President NoBo to stop asking for debt ceiling increases and start asking for Spending Cuts.

Posted by: Noz | January 2, 2012, 8:26 am 8:26 am

It’s stunning when folks like you are unable to work the ongoing commitments stemming from the Clinton, Johnson and FDR administrations into the ongoing budget requirements of the Bush administration–Foggy

That is likely because the biggest chunk of budget requirements comes from the Bush admin. Bush’s administration accounts for nearly half– 43% / 6+ billion of the debt– while the Clinton admin accounts for $1.4 billion, Obama admin. $2.4 billion (1.1 billion comes from the stimulus which was necessary regardless of right wing rhetoric– those who adopted the austerity economics the right recommended didn’t fare well and given 2011, austerity economics ought to be dead to all who paid attention), George H.W. Bush, $1.5 trillion, Reagan, about $2 billion, and presidents prior to that about $1 billion.

Posted by: Reese | January 2, 2012, 11:41 am 11:41 am

How many people know the all 435 seats in the lower house are up for grabs in 2012?–Bob

Given how the high disapproval and unfavorability ratings Congress, particularly congressional republicans, I’m hopeful that EVERYONE is aware that they can vote the do-nothings out. I disagree with the rest of your partisan-flavored opinion but I do encourage those who are unhappy with the results of the elections in 2010 to do something about it like the fine citizens of Wisconsin are.

Posted by: Reese | January 2, 2012, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.