Comments on: Romney Team Shifts Tactics

By: Jack Myswag

Jack Myswag — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:17:05 +0000

“The strange thing is that everyone has seen Newt’s dirty laundry and STILL he surges ahead”

It’s just tooo funny that Newt surges, while being an immoral philanderer. This proves the low morals, nay, the extremely IMMORALITY of the RepuKelican’ts (=incompetent and makes one wanna barf) Just like with Bristol Palin, black unwed mothers are demonized as irresponsible, but we when Bristol did it, it was suddenly all okay

Cain proved this as well: sexually harassing women (criminal) was forgivable, but cheating (not a criminal act) …. well that was unforgivable.
Unless of course …. you’re a white man (Newt) sleeping with white women, of course! Then it’s a-OK.
Other well known Repubes’ cheaters: Guiliani, McCain (their wives had cancer, just like Newts two wives) , Vitter (hookers), Ensign (his subordinates wife), Sanford (argentine woman), and the gay trio, Larry Craig, Mark Foley and George Reker (google his name with rentboy.com just for laughs)

By: nateanthem

nateanthem — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 06:56:18 +0000

Please have a look at the tenants of the Mormon Church. Google the words “unclean,” “temple” and “Mormon” and read the results. The Law of the Mormon Church clearly states that “no unclean person has the right to enter God’s house (the Mormon temples)” furthermore, anybody (and yes they do mean **ANYBODY**) who is not a Mormon is condisered to be “unclean”. By that definition, over 95% of the Republican Party are “unclean” and ABSOLUTELY **NOT** ALLOWED TO ENTER A MORMON CHURCH! Even the late Ronald Reagan would have been considered “unclean” and not allowed to enter the Mormon temple, he wasn’t a Mormon. The Mormon’s definition of “clean” is so narrow that **ANY** person (Republican, Democrat or otherwise) who is not a Mormon is considered “unclean” and not allowed to enter a Mormon temple. That definition includes Jews, Catholics, Baptists, Methodists, and probably you!!! In essence what the Mormon Church is saying is, “You are unclean, we won’t allow you to enter our Church, but we do want you to vote for Mitt Romney.” Republicans are not stupid, why would Republicans vote for a person in an organization that has publicly rejected them because they are not a Mormon?

By: Quivley

Quivley — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 06:01:19 +0000

Some comments (such as Tom789) are truly Offensive. Romney has NEVER BEEN CAUGHT IN A LIE! Romney is a man of impeccable character, who has not and will not lie. If anyone’s statements are taken out of context, they can appear contradictory. Any thinking person (including Obama and Gingrich and Romney) has changed his position or point of view on an issue, but that does not mean he has lied. A person who has never changed his opinion is a person who has never learned. A person whose opinions are stuck in the past and who is unwilling to learn and change has a fossilized brain!

By: Larry J

Larry J — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:00:35 +0000

Mitt’s team doesn’t get it. Between Mitt being a squish and his attacking other Republican candidates, he’s not generating a lot of support. How about spending the effort to go after Obama instead like Newt does? That would be change we can believe in.

By: AmericaThePitiful

AmericaThePitiful — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:46:11 +0000

Oh great. The media blitz begins.

By: welldirected

welldirected — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:00:48 +0000

Romney or one of the others should campaign on uniting the people of the United States. That worked for Obama – OK, he did just the opposite. That one tent, US as a family, is a message that is sorely lacking in our politics.

By: welldirected

welldirected — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:51:14 +0000

I would vote for a third party before I would vote for Newt Gingrich and many other independents feel the same way. Reprehensible, morally bankrupt, corrupt, fat, ego-maniacal – those are the attributes that I guess appeal to Iowa and NC voters.

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:33:53 +0000

Add another tactical change coming to light and much too important not to tell the voting public: DESTROYING EVIDENCE : Romney and cohorts spent a lot of public money to cover up his past as Governor of Massachusetts. Erasing records. Buying up computer equipment. You can’t make this stuff up. very very sad.

By: ocmarsha

ocmarsha — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:10:18 +0000

Unfortunately, I don’t see any candidate worth endorsing yet. I’m not as educated as I’d like to be in politics, but there are so many things wrong with the system, it makes it hard to want to learn. The twisting of facts, the favors for campaign funds, the lobbyists, the division into parties., etc. It would be great if everyone would vote for the best candidate and eliminate party lines. I would also like to see business/corporate and PAC contributions eliminated completely and public lists of donations received.

By: Buddha1127

Buddha1127 — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:35:31 +0000

ABC loves Mitt Romney, THAT is very apparent. It’s too bad that Newspapers feel the need to pick a side before anyone is elected. They lose ALL of the other voters after the outcome of the elections.